Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
07 Nov 2022
Research article |
| 07 Nov 2022
| 07 Nov 2022
A large-sample investigation into uncertain climate change impacts on high flows across Great Britain
School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK
currently at: UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
Gemma Coxon
School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK
Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UJ, UK
Jim Freer
School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK
Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UJ, UK
Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Canmore, Alberta,
T1W 3G1, Canada
Jan Seibert
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Thorsten Wagener
Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UJ, UK
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TR, UK
Institute of Environmental Science and Geography, University of
Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Related authors
Saskia Salwey, Gemma Coxon, Francesca Pianosi, Rosanna Lane, Chris Hutton, Michael Bliss Singer, Hilary McMillan, and Jim Freer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4203–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs are essential for water resource management and can significantly impact downstream flow. However, representing reservoirs in hydrological models can be challenging, particularly across large scales. We design a new and simple method for simulating river flow downstream of water supply reservoirs using only open-access data. We demonstrate the approach in 264 reservoir catchments across Great Britain, where we can significantly improve the simulation of reservoir-impacted flow.
Simon Parry, Jonathan D. Mackay, Thomas Chitson, Jamie Hannaford, Eugene Magee, Maliko Tanguy, Victoria A. Bell, Katie Facer-Childs, Alison Kay, Rosanna Lane, Robert J. Moore, Stephen Turner, and John Wallbank
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 417–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We studied drought in a dataset of possible future river flows and groundwater levels in the UK and found different outcomes for these two sources of water. Throughout the UK, river flows are likely to be lower in future, with droughts more prolonged and severe. However, whilst these changes are also found in some boreholes, in others, higher levels and less severe drought are indicated for the future. This has implications for the future balance between surface water and groundwater below.
Emma L. Robinson, Matthew J. Brown, Alison L. Kay, Rosanna A. Lane, Rhian Chapman, Victoria A. Bell, and Eleanor M. Blyth
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4433–4461, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4433-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4433-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents two new Penman–Monteith potential evaporation datasets for the UK, calculated with the same methodology applied to historical climate data (Hydro-PE HadUK-Grid) and an ensemble of future climate projections (Hydro-PE UKCP18 RCM). Both include an optional correction for evaporation of rain that lands on the surface of vegetation. The historical data are consistent with existing PE datasets, and the future projections include effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on vegetation.
Alison L. Kay, Victoria A. Bell, Helen N. Davies, Rosanna A. Lane, and Alison C. Rudd
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2533–2546, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2533-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2533-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change will affect the water cycle, including river flows and soil moisture. We have used both observational data (1980–2011) and the latest UK climate projections (1980–2080) to drive a national-scale grid-based hydrological model. The data, covering Great Britain and Northern Ireland, suggest potential future decreases in summer flows, low flows, and summer/autumn soil moisture, and possible future increases in winter and high flows. Society must plan how to adapt to such impacts.
Jamie Hannaford, Jonathan D. Mackay, Matthew Ascott, Victoria A. Bell, Thomas Chitson, Steven Cole, Christian Counsell, Mason Durant, Christopher R. Jackson, Alison L. Kay, Rosanna A. Lane, Majdi Mansour, Robert Moore, Simon Parry, Alison C. Rudd, Michael Simpson, Katie Facer-Childs, Stephen Turner, John R. Wallbank, Steven Wells, and Amy Wilcox
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2391–2415, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2391-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2391-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The eFLaG dataset is a nationally consistent set of projections of future climate change impacts on hydrology. eFLaG uses the latest available UK climate projections (UKCP18) run through a series of computer simulation models which enable us to produce future projections of river flows, groundwater levels and groundwater recharge. These simulations are designed for use by water resource planners and managers but could also be used for a wide range of other purposes.
Gemma Coxon, Nans Addor, John P. Bloomfield, Jim Freer, Matt Fry, Jamie Hannaford, Nicholas J. K. Howden, Rosanna Lane, Melinda Lewis, Emma L. Robinson, Thorsten Wagener, and Ross Woods
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2459–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first large-sample catchment hydrology dataset for Great Britain. The dataset collates river flows, catchment attributes, and catchment boundaries for 671 catchments across Great Britain. We characterise the topography, climate, streamflow, land cover, soils, hydrogeology, human influence, and discharge uncertainty of each catchment. The dataset is publicly available for the community to use in a wide range of environmental and modelling analyses.
Ondrej Hotovy, Ondrej Nedelcev, Jan Seibert, and Michal Jenicek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 4199–4217, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4199-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Rain falling on snow (RoS) can accelerate snowmelt and affect runoff, potentially causing severe flooding. We assessed the regional and seasonal variations in the occurrence of RoS in mountainous catchments in central Europe under different perturbations of future climate. Our results showed that RoS changes driven by climate change vary greatly among regions, across elevations, and within the cold season. However, most projections suggested a decrease in RoS events and RoS-driven runoff.
Inhye Kong, Jan Seibert, and Ross S. Purves
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3795–3808, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3795-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3795-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the timing and topics of newspaper coverage of droughts in England. Media attention correlated with drought-prone hydroclimatic conditions, particularly low precipitation and low groundwater levels, but also showed a seasonality bias, with more coverage in spring and summer, as exemplified by the 2022 summer drought. The findings reveal complex media dynamics in science communication, suggesting potential gaps in how droughts are framed by scientists versus the media.
Francesca Pianosi, Georgios Sarailidis, Kirsty Styles, Philip Oldham, Stephen Hutchings, Rob Lamb, and Thorsten Wagener
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3310, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3310, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Flood risk models are essential to support risk management. As they simulate complex interactions between climate, the natural and the built environment, they unavoidably embed a range of simplifying assumptions. In this paper, we propose a more rigorous approach to analyse the impact of uncertain assumptions on modelling results. This is important to improve model transparency and set priorities for improving models.
Yanchen Zheng, Gemma Coxon, Mostaquimur Rahman, Ross Woods, Saskia Salwey, Youtong Rong, and Doris E. Wendt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4247–4271, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4247-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4247-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is vital for people and ecosystems, but most physical models lack the representation of surface–groundwater interactions, leading to inaccurate streamflow predictions in groundwater-rich areas. This study presents DECIPHeR-GW v1, which links surface and groundwater systems to improve predictions of streamflow and groundwater levels. Tested across England and Wales, DECIPHeR-GW shows high accuracy, especially in southeast England, making it a valuable tool for large-scale water management.
William Veness, Alejandro Dussaillant, Gemma Coxon, Simon De Stercke, Gareth H. Old, Matthew Fry, Jonathan G. Evans, and Wouter Buytaert
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2035, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2035, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated what users want from the next-generation of hydrological monitoring systems to better support science and innovation. Through literature review and interviews with experts, we found that beyond providing high-quality data, users particularly value additional support for collecting their own data, sharing it with others, and building collaborations with other data users. Designing systems with these needs in mind can greatly boost long-term engagement, data coverage and impact.
Doris Elise Wendt, Gemma Coxon, Saskia Salwey, and Francesca Pianosi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1645, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1645, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is a highly-used water source, which drought management is complicated. We introduce a socio-hydrological water resource model (SHOWER) to aid drought management in groundwater-rich managed environments. Results show which and when drought management interventions influence surface water and groundwater storage, with integrated interventions having most effect on reducing droughts. This encourages further exploration to reduce water shortages and improve future drought resilience.
Thiago Victor Medeiros do Nascimento, Julia Rudlang, Sebastian Gnann, Jan Seibert, Markus Hrachowitz, and Fabrizio Fenicia
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-739, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-739, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Large-sample hydrological studies often overlook the importance of detailed landscape data in explaining river flow variability. Analyzing over 4,000 European catchments, we found that geology becomes a dominant factor—especially for baseflow—when using detailed regional maps. This highlights the need for high-resolution geological data to improve river flow regionalization, particularly in non-monitored areas.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Jannis M. Hoch, Gemma Coxon, Nick C. van de Giesen, and Rolf W. Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5011–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For users of hydrological models, model suitability often hinges on how well simulated outputs match observed discharge. This study highlights the importance of including discharge observation uncertainty in hydrological model performance assessment. We highlight the need to account for this uncertainty in model comparisons and introduce a practical method suitable for any observational time series with available uncertainty estimates.
Saskia Salwey, Gemma Coxon, Francesca Pianosi, Rosanna Lane, Chris Hutton, Michael Bliss Singer, Hilary McMillan, and Jim Freer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4203–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs are essential for water resource management and can significantly impact downstream flow. However, representing reservoirs in hydrological models can be challenging, particularly across large scales. We design a new and simple method for simulating river flow downstream of water supply reservoirs using only open-access data. We demonstrate the approach in 264 reservoir catchments across Great Britain, where we can significantly improve the simulation of reservoir-impacted flow.
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show that the differences between the forcing data included in three CAMELS datasets (US, BR, GB) and the forcing data included for the same catchments in the Caravan dataset affect model calibration considerably. The model performance dropped when the data from the Caravan dataset were used instead of the original data. Most of the model performance drop could be attributed to the differences in precipitation data. However, differences were largest for the potential evapotranspiration data.
Yanchen Zheng, Gemma Coxon, Ross Woods, Daniel Power, Miguel Angel Rico-Ramirez, David McJannet, Rafael Rosolem, Jianzhu Li, and Ping Feng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1999–2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1999-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1999-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reanalysis soil moisture products are a vital basis for hydrological and environmental research. Previous product evaluation is limited by the scale difference (point and grid scale). This paper adopts cosmic ray neutron sensor observations, a novel technique that provides root-zone soil moisture at field scale. In this paper, global harmonized CRNS observations were used to assess products. ERA5-Land, SMAPL4, CFSv2, CRA40 and GLEAM show better performance than MERRA2, GLDAS-Noah and JRA55.
Simon Parry, Jonathan D. Mackay, Thomas Chitson, Jamie Hannaford, Eugene Magee, Maliko Tanguy, Victoria A. Bell, Katie Facer-Childs, Alison Kay, Rosanna Lane, Robert J. Moore, Stephen Turner, and John Wallbank
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 417–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We studied drought in a dataset of possible future river flows and groundwater levels in the UK and found different outcomes for these two sources of water. Throughout the UK, river flows are likely to be lower in future, with droughts more prolonged and severe. However, whilst these changes are also found in some boreholes, in others, higher levels and less severe drought are indicated for the future. This has implications for the future balance between surface water and groundwater below.
Emma L. Robinson, Matthew J. Brown, Alison L. Kay, Rosanna A. Lane, Rhian Chapman, Victoria A. Bell, and Eleanor M. Blyth
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4433–4461, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4433-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4433-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents two new Penman–Monteith potential evaporation datasets for the UK, calculated with the same methodology applied to historical climate data (Hydro-PE HadUK-Grid) and an ensemble of future climate projections (Hydro-PE UKCP18 RCM). Both include an optional correction for evaporation of rain that lands on the surface of vegetation. The historical data are consistent with existing PE datasets, and the future projections include effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on vegetation.
Kathryn A. Leeming, John P. Bloomfield, Gemma Coxon, and Yanchen Zheng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-202, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-202, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we characterise annual patterns in baseflow, the component of streamflow that comes from subsurface storage. Our research identified early-, mid-, and late-seasonality of baseflow across catchments in Great Britain over two time blocks: 1976–1995 and 1996–2015, and found that many catchments have earlier seasonal patterns of baseflow in the second time period. These changes are linked to changes in climate signals: snow-melt in highland catchments and effective rainfall changes.
Trevor Page, Paul Smith, Keith Beven, Francesca Pianosi, Fanny Sarrazin, Susana Almeida, Liz Holcombe, Jim Freer, Nick Chappell, and Thorsten Wagener
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2523–2534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2523-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2523-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This publication provides an introduction to the CREDIBLE Uncertainty Estimation (CURE) toolbox. CURE offers workflows for a variety of uncertainty estimation methods. One of its most important features is the requirement that all of the assumptions on which a workflow analysis depends be defined. This facilitates communication with potential users of an analysis. An audit trail log is produced automatically from a workflow for future reference.
Alison L. Kay, Victoria A. Bell, Helen N. Davies, Rosanna A. Lane, and Alison C. Rudd
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2533–2546, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2533-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2533-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change will affect the water cycle, including river flows and soil moisture. We have used both observational data (1980–2011) and the latest UK climate projections (1980–2080) to drive a national-scale grid-based hydrological model. The data, covering Great Britain and Northern Ireland, suggest potential future decreases in summer flows, low flows, and summer/autumn soil moisture, and possible future increases in winter and high flows. Society must plan how to adapt to such impacts.
Jamie Hannaford, Jonathan D. Mackay, Matthew Ascott, Victoria A. Bell, Thomas Chitson, Steven Cole, Christian Counsell, Mason Durant, Christopher R. Jackson, Alison L. Kay, Rosanna A. Lane, Majdi Mansour, Robert Moore, Simon Parry, Alison C. Rudd, Michael Simpson, Katie Facer-Childs, Stephen Turner, John R. Wallbank, Steven Wells, and Amy Wilcox
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2391–2415, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2391-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2391-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The eFLaG dataset is a nationally consistent set of projections of future climate change impacts on hydrology. eFLaG uses the latest available UK climate projections (UKCP18) run through a series of computer simulation models which enable us to produce future projections of river flows, groundwater levels and groundwater recharge. These simulations are designed for use by water resource planners and managers but could also be used for a wide range of other purposes.
Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Anne F. Van Loon, Maurizio Mazzoleni, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Svetlana Agafonova, Amir AghaKouchak, Hafzullah Aksoy, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Blanca Aznar, Laila Balkhi, Marlies H. Barendrecht, Sylvain Biancamaria, Liduin Bos-Burgering, Chris Bradley, Yus Budiyono, Wouter Buytaert, Lucinda Capewell, Hayley Carlson, Yonca Cavus, Anaïs Couasnon, Gemma Coxon, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Claire Delus, Mathilde Erfurt, Giuseppe Esposito, Didier François, Frédéric Frappart, Jim Freer, Natalia Frolova, Animesh K. Gain, Manolis Grillakis, Jordi Oriol Grima, Diego A. Guzmán, Laurie S. Huning, Monica Ionita, Maxim Kharlamov, Dao Nguyen Khoi, Natalie Kieboom, Maria Kireeva, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Waldo Lavado-Casimiro, Hong-Yi Li, Maria Carmen LLasat, David Macdonald, Johanna Mård, Hannah Mathew-Richards, Andrew McKenzie, Alfonso Mejia, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Marjolein Mens, Shifteh Mobini, Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Viorica Nagavciuc, Thanh Ngo-Duc, Huynh Thi Thao Nguyen, Pham Thi Thao Nhi, Olga Petrucci, Nguyen Hong Quan, Pere Quintana-Seguí, Saman Razavi, Elena Ridolfi, Jannik Riegel, Md Shibly Sadik, Nivedita Sairam, Elisa Savelli, Alexey Sazonov, Sanjib Sharma, Johanna Sörensen, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Kerstin Stahl, Max Steinhausen, Michael Stoelzle, Wiwiana Szalińska, Qiuhong Tang, Fuqiang Tian, Tamara Tokarczyk, Carolina Tovar, Thi Van Thu Tran, Marjolein H. J. van Huijgevoort, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Thorsten Wagener, Yueling Wang, Doris E. Wendt, Elliot Wickham, Long Yang, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2009–2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As the adverse impacts of hydrological extremes increase in many regions of the world, a better understanding of the drivers of changes in risk and impacts is essential for effective flood and drought risk management. We present a dataset containing data of paired events, i.e. two floods or two droughts that occurred in the same area. The dataset enables comparative analyses and allows detailed context-specific assessments. Additionally, it supports the testing of socio-hydrological models.
Jana Erdbrügger, Ilja van Meerveld, Jan Seibert, and Kevin Bishop
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1779–1800, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1779-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1779-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater can respond quickly to precipitation and is the main source of streamflow in most catchments in humid, temperate climates. To better understand shallow groundwater dynamics, we installed a network of groundwater wells in two boreal headwater catchments in Sweden. We recorded groundwater levels in 75 wells for 2 years and sampled the water and analyzed its chemical composition in one summer. This paper describes these datasets.
Louisa D. Oldham, Jim Freer, Gemma Coxon, Nicholas Howden, John P. Bloomfield, and Christopher Jackson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 761–781, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-761-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-761-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water can move between river catchments via the subsurface, termed intercatchment groundwater flow (IGF). We show how a perceptual model of IGF can be developed with relatively simple geological interpretation and data requirements. We find that IGF dynamics vary in space, correlated to the dominant underlying geology. We recommend that IGF
loss functionsmay be used in conceptual rainfall–runoff models but should be supported by perceptualisation of IGF processes and connectivities.
Sarah Shannon, Anthony Payne, Jim Freer, Gemma Coxon, Martina Kauzlaric, David Kriegel, and Stephan Harrison
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 453–480, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-453-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-453-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change poses a potential threat to water supply in glaciated river catchments. In this study, we added a snowmelt and glacier melt model to the Dynamic fluxEs and ConnectIvity for Predictions of HydRology model (DECIPHeR). The model is applied to the Naryn River catchment in central Asia and is found to reproduce past change discharge and the spatial extent of seasonal snow cover well.
Daniel Viviroli, Anna E. Sikorska-Senoner, Guillaume Evin, Maria Staudinger, Martina Kauzlaric, Jérémy Chardon, Anne-Catherine Favre, Benoit Hingray, Gilles Nicolet, Damien Raynaud, Jan Seibert, Rolf Weingartner, and Calvin Whealton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2891–2920, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2891-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2891-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating the magnitude of rare to very rare floods is a challenging task due to a lack of sufficiently long observations. The challenge is even greater in large river basins, where precipitation patterns and amounts differ considerably between individual events and floods from different parts of the basin coincide. We show that a hydrometeorological model chain can provide plausible estimates in this setting and can thus inform flood risk and safety assessments for critical infrastructure.
Jan Seibert and Sten Bergström
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1371–1388, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological catchment models are commonly used as the basis for water resource management planning. The HBV model, which is a typical example of such a model, was first applied about 50 years ago in Sweden. We describe and reflect on the model development and applications. The aim is to provide an understanding of the background of model development and a basis for addressing the balance between model complexity and data availability that will continue to face hydrologists in the future.
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is increasingly being included in large-scale (continental to global) land surface and hydrologic simulations. However, it is challenging to evaluate these simulations because groundwater is
hiddenunderground and thus hard to measure. We suggest using multiple complementary strategies to assess the performance of a model (
model evaluation).
Thomas Lees, Marcus Buechel, Bailey Anderson, Louise Slater, Steven Reece, Gemma Coxon, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5517–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used deep learning (DL) models to simulate the amount of water moving through a river channel (discharge) based on the rainfall, temperature and potential evaporation in the previous days. We tested the DL models on catchments across Great Britain finding that the model can accurately simulate hydrological systems across a variety of catchment conditions. Ultimately, the model struggled most in areas where there is chalky bedrock and where human influence on the catchment is large.
John P. Bloomfield, Mengyi Gong, Benjamin P. Marchant, Gemma Coxon, and Nans Addor
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5355–5379, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5355-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater provides flow, known as baseflow, to surface streams and rivers. It is important as it sustains the flow of many rivers at times of water stress. However, it may be affected by water management practices. Statistical models have been used to show that abstraction of groundwater may influence baseflow. Consequently, it is recommended that information on groundwater abstraction is included in future assessments and predictions of baseflow.
Marit Van Tiel, Anne F. Van Loon, Jan Seibert, and Kerstin Stahl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3245–3265, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3245-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3245-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Glaciers can buffer streamflow during dry and warm periods, but under which circumstances can melt compensate precipitation deficits? Streamflow responses to warm and dry events were analyzed using
long-term observations of 50 glacierized catchments in Norway, Canada, and the European Alps. Region, timing of the event, relative glacier cover, and antecedent event conditions all affect the level of compensation during these events. This implies that glaciers do not compensate straightforwardly.
Thorsten Wagener, Dragan Savic, David Butler, Reza Ahmadian, Tom Arnot, Jonathan Dawes, Slobodan Djordjevic, Roger Falconer, Raziyeh Farmani, Debbie Ford, Jan Hofman, Zoran Kapelan, Shunqi Pan, and Ross Woods
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2721–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
How can we effectively train PhD candidates both (i) across different knowledge domains in water science and engineering and (ii) in computer science? To address this issue, the Water Informatics in Science and Engineering Centre for Doctoral Training (WISE CDT) offers a postgraduate programme that fosters enhanced levels of innovation and collaboration by training a cohort of engineers and scientists at the boundary of water informatics, science and engineering.
Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Juan Pablo Boisier, René Garreaud, Jan Seibert, and Marc Vis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 429–446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-429-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The megadrought experienced in Chile (2010–2020) has led to larger than expected water deficits. By analysing 106 basins with snow-/rainfall regimes, we relate such intensification with the hydrological memory of the basins, explained by snow and groundwater. Snow-dominated basins have larger memory and thus accumulate the effect of persistent precipitation deficits more strongly than pluvial basins. This notably affects central Chile, a water-limited region where most of the population lives.
Anna E. Sikorska-Senoner, Bettina Schaefli, and Jan Seibert
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3521–3549, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3521-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3521-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This work proposes methods for reducing the computational requirements of hydrological simulations for the estimation of very rare floods that occur on average less than once in 1000 years. These methods enable the analysis of long streamflow time series (here for example 10 000 years) at low computational costs and with modelling uncertainty. They are to be used within continuous simulation frameworks with long input time series and are readily transferable to similar simulation tasks.
Elisa Bozzolan, Elizabeth Holcombe, Francesca Pianosi, and Thorsten Wagener
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3161–3177, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3161-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3161-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We include informal housing in slope stability analysis, considering different slope properties and precipitation events (including climate change). The dominant failure processes are identified, and their relative role in slope failure is quantified. A new rainfall threshold is assessed for urbanised slopes. Instability
rulesare provided to recognise urbanised slopes most at risk. The methodology is suitable for regions with scarce field measurements and landslide inventories.
Maria Staudinger, Stefan Seeger, Barbara Herbstritt, Michael Stoelzle, Jan Seibert, Kerstin Stahl, and Markus Weiler
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3057–3066, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3057-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3057-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The data set CH-IRP provides isotope composition in precipitation and streamflow from 23 Swiss catchments, being unique regarding its long-term multi-catchment coverage along an alpine–pre-alpine gradient. CH-IRP contains fortnightly time series of stable water isotopes from streamflow grab samples complemented by time series in precipitation. Sampling conditions, catchment and climate information, lab standards and errors are provided together with areal precipitation and catchment boundaries.
Gemma Coxon, Nans Addor, John P. Bloomfield, Jim Freer, Matt Fry, Jamie Hannaford, Nicholas J. K. Howden, Rosanna Lane, Melinda Lewis, Emma L. Robinson, Thorsten Wagener, and Ross Woods
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2459–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first large-sample catchment hydrology dataset for Great Britain. The dataset collates river flows, catchment attributes, and catchment boundaries for 671 catchments across Great Britain. We characterise the topography, climate, streamflow, land cover, soils, hydrogeology, human influence, and discharge uncertainty of each catchment. The dataset is publicly available for the community to use in a wide range of environmental and modelling analyses.
Marc Girons Lopez, Marc J. P. Vis, Michal Jenicek, Nena Griessinger, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4441–4461, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4441-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4441-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Snow processes are crucial for runoff in mountainous areas, but their complexity makes water management difficult. Temperature models are widely used as they are simple and do not require much data, but not much thought is usually given to which model to use, which may lead to bad predictions. We studied the impact of many model alternatives and found that a more complex model does not necessarily perform better. Finding which processes are most important in each area is a much better strategy.
Cited articles
Addor, N. and Seibert, J.: Bias correction for hydrological impact studies –
beyond the daily perspective, Hydrol. Process., 28, 4823–4828,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10238, 2014.
Addor, N., Rössler, O., Köplin, N., Huss, M., Weingartner, R., and
Seibert, J.: Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected
hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments, Water Resour. Res., 50,
7541–7562, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015549, 2014.
Arnell, N. W.: Uncertainty in the relationship between climate forcing and hydrological response in UK catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 897–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-897-2011, 2011.
Bell, V. A., Kay, A. L., Jones, R. G., and Moore, R. J.: Use of a grid-based
hydrological model and regional climate model outputs to assess changing
flood risk, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1657–1671, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1539,
2007.
Bell, V. A., Kay, A. L., Davies, H. N., and Jones, R. G.: An assessment of
the possible impacts of climate change on snow and peak river flows across
Britain, Clim. Change, 136, 539–553, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1637-x,
2016.
Bosshard, T., Carambia, M., Goergen, K., Kotlarski, S., Krahe, P., Zappa, M., and Schar, C.: Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of
hydrological climate-impact projections, Water Resour. Res., 49,
1523–1536, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011533, 2013.
Brown, C. M., Lund, J. R., Cai, X., Reed, P. M., Zagona, E. A., Ostfeld, A.,
Hall, J., Characklis, G. W., Yu, W., and Brekke, L.: The future of water
resources systems analysis: Toward a scientific framework for sustainable
water management, Water Resour. Res., 51, 6110–6124, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017114, 2015.
Buurman, J. and Babovic, V.: Adaptation Pathways and Real Options Analysis:
An approach to deep uncertainty in climate change adaptation policies,
Policy Soc., 35, 137–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.05.002, 2016.
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology: National River Flow Archive, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology [data set], http://nrfa.ceh.ac.uk/ (last access: 23 January 2017), 2016.
Chan, W. C., Shepherd, T. G., Facer-Childs, K., Darch, G., and Arnell, N. W.: Tracking the methodological evolution of climate change projections for UK river flows, Prog. Phys. Geograph., 46, 589–612, https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333221079201, 2022.
Charlton, M. B. and Arnell, N. W.: Assessing the impacts of climate change
on river flows in England using the UKCP09 climate change projections, J.
Hydrol., 519, 1723–1738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.008, 2014.
Chegwidden, O. S., Nijssen, B., Rupp, D. E., Arnold, J. R., Clark, M. P.,
Hamman, J. J., Kao, S., Mao, Y., Mizukami, N., Mote, P. W., Pan, M., Pytlak,
E., and Xiao, M.: How Do Modeling Decisions Affect the Spread Among
Hydrologic Climate Change Projections? Exploring a Large Ensemble of
Simulations Across a Diversity of Hydroclimates, Earth's Future, 7,
623–637, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001047, 2019.
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., Poulin, A., and Leconte, R.: Overall uncertainty
study of the hydrological impacts of climate change for a Canadian
watershed, Water Resour. Res., 47, W12509, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010602, 2011.
Christierson, B. V., Vidal, J.-P., and Wade, S. D.: Using UKCP09 probabilistic climate information for UK water resource planning, J.
Hydrol., 424–425, 48–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.020, 2012.
Clark, M. P., Wilby, R. L., Gutmann, E. D., Vano, J. A., Gangopadhyay, S.,
Wood, A. W., Fowler, H. J., Prudhomme, C., Arnold, J. A., and Brekke, L. D.:
Characterizing uncertainty of the hydrologic impacts of climate change,
Curr. Clim. Chang. Reports, 2, 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0034-x, 2016.
Cloke, H. L., Wetterhall, F., He, Y., Freer, J. E., and Pappenberger, F.:
Modelling climate impact on floods with ensemble climate projections, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 282–297, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1998, 2013.
Collet, L., Harrigan, S., Prudhomme, C., Formetta, G., and Beevers, L.: Future hot-spots for hydro-hazards in Great Britain: a probabilistic assessment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5387–5401, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5387-2018, 2018.
Coxon, G. and Dunne, T.: uob-hydrology/DECIPHeR: DECIPHeR V1 (v1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2604120, 2019.
Coxon, G., Freer, J., Lane, R., Dunne, T., Knoben, W. J. M., Howden, N. J. K., Quinn, N., Wagener, T., and Woods, R.: DECIPHeR v1: Dynamic fluxEs and ConnectIvity for Predictions of HydRology, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2285–2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2285-2019, 2019.
Coxon, G., Addor, N., Bloomfield, J. P., Freer, J., Fry, M., Hannaford, J., Howden, N. J. K., Lane, R., Lewis, M., Robinson, E. L., Wagener, T., and Woods, R.: CAMELS-GB: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 671 catchments in Great Britain, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2459–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, 2020.
Dixon, H., Hannaford, J., and Fry, M. J.: The effective management of
national hydrometric data: experiences from the United Kingdom, Hydrolog. Sci.
J., 58, 1383–1399, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.787486, 2013.
Eicker, A., Forootan, E., Springer, A., Longuevergne, L., and Kusche, J.:
Does GRACE see the terrestrial water cycle “intensifying”?, J. Geophys.
Res., 121, 733–745, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023808, 2016.
Engin, B. E., Yücel, I., and Yilmaz, A.: Assessing different sources of
uncertainty in hydrological projections of high and low flows: case study
for Omerli Basin, Istanbul, Turkey, Environ. Monit. Assess., 189, 1–9,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6059-3, 2017.
Environment Agency: Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances'
Guidance, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/flood-risk-assessments-climate-change-allowances, last access: 25 November 2020a.
Environment Agency: National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management
Strategy for England, Environment Agency, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ (last access: 26 October 2022), 2020b.
Fowler, H. J. and Ekström, M.: Multi-model ensemble estimates of climate
change impacts on UK seasonal precipitation extremes, Int. J. Climatol.,
29, 385–416, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1827, 2009.
Hannaford, J.: Climate-driven changes in UK river flows: A review of the
evidence, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 39, 29–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314536755,
2015.
Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1095–1108, 2009.
Huntington, T. G.: Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle:
Review and synthesis, J. Hydrol., 319, 83–95,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003, 2006.
IPCC: Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., 2014.
Ivancic, T. J. and Shaw, S. B.: Examining why trends in very heavy
precipitation should not be mistaken for trends in very high river
discharge, Clim. Change, 133, 681–693, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1476-1, 2015.
Johnson, F. and Sharma, A.: A nesting model for bias correction of variability at multiple time scales in general circulation model precipitation simulations, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010464, 2012.
Kay, A. L. and Crooks, S. M.: An investigation of the effect of transient
climate change on snowmelt, flood frequency and timing in northern Britain,
Int. J. Climatol., 34, 3368–3381, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3913, 2014.
Kay, A. L. and Davies, H. N.: Calculating potential evaporation from climate
model data: A source of uncertainty for hydrological climate change impacts,
J. Hydrol., 358, 221–239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.005, 2008.
Kay, A. L., Davies, H. N., Bell, V. A., and Jones, R. G.: Comparison of
uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England,
Clim. Change, 92, 41–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4, 2009.
Kay, A. L., Crooks, S. M., Davies, H. N., Prudhomme, C., and Reynard, N. S.:
Probabilistic impacts of climate change on flood frequency using response
surfaces I: England and Wales, Reg. Environ. Chang., 14, 1215–1227,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0563-y, 2014a.
Kay, A. L., Crooks, S. M., Davies, H. N., and Reynard, N. S.: Probabilistic
impacts of climate change on flood frequency using response surfaces II:
Scotland, Reg. Environ. Chang., 14, 1243–1255,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0564-x, 2014b.
Kay, A. L., Watts, G., Wells, S. C., and Allen, S.: The impact of climate
change on U. K. river flows: A preliminary comparison of two generations of
probabilistic climate projections, Hydrol. Process., 34, 1081–1088,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13644, 2020.
Kay, A. L., Griffin, A., Rudd, A. C., Chapman, R. M., Bell, V. A., and Arnell, N. W.: Climate change effects on indicators of high and low river flow across Great Britain, Adv. Water Res., 151, 103909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103909, 2021.
Keller, V. D. J., Tanguy, M., Prosdocimi, I., Terry, J. A., Hitt, O., Cole, S. J., Fry, M., Morris, D. G., and Dixon, H.: CEH-GEAR: 1 km resolution daily and monthly areal rainfall estimates for the UK for hydrological and other applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 143–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-143-2015, 2015.
Köplin, N., Schädler, B., Viviroli, D., and Weingartner, R.:
Seasonality and magnitude of floods in Switzerland under future climate
change, Hydrol. Process., 28, 2567–2578, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9757, 2014.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Krysanova, V., Benestad, R. E., Hov, Ø., Piniewski, M., and Otto, I. M.: Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources,
Environ. Sci. Policy, 79, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.008, 2018.
Laizé, C. L. R. and Hannah, D. M.: Modification of climate-river flow
associations by basin properties, J. Hydrol., 389, 186–204,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.048, 2010.
Lane, R.: DECIPHeR_MPR (1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4646179, 2021b.
Lane, R. A. and Kay, A. L.: Climate Change Impact on the Magnitude and
Timing of Hydrological Extremes Across Great Britain, Front. Water, 3, 71,
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.684982, 2021.
Lane, R. A., Coxon, G., Freer, J. E., Wagener, T., Johnes, P. J., Bloomfield, J. P., Greene, S., Macleod, C. J. A., and Reaney, S. M.: Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4011–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019, 2019.
Lane, R., Freer, J., Coxon, G., and Wagener, T.: Incorporating uncertainty
into multiscale parameter regionalisation to produce national parameter
fields for a hydrological model, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028393, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028393, 2021.
Lowe, J. A., Bernie, D., Bett, P., Bricheno, L., Brown, S., Calvert, D.,
Clark, R., Eagle, K., Edwards, T., Fosser, G., Fung, F., Gohar, L., Good,
P., Gregory, J., Harris, G., Howard, T., Kaye, N., Kendon, E., Krijnen, J.,
Maisey, P., McDonald, R., McInnes, R., McSweeney, C., Mitchell, J., Murphy,
J., Palmer, M., Roberts, C., Rostron, J., Sexton, D., Thornton, H., Tinker,
J., Tucker, S., Yamazaki, K., and Belcher, S.: UKCP18 Science Overview
Report: Version 2.0,
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data (last access: 17 October 2022), 2019.
Mendoza, P. A., Clark, M. P., Mizukami, N., Newman, A. J., Barlage, M.,
Gutmann, E. D., Rasmussen, R. M., Rajagopalan, B., Brekke, L. D., and Arnold,
J. R.: Effects of Hydrologic Model Choice and Calibration on the Portrayal
of Climate Change Impacts, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 762–780,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0104.1, 2015.
Meresa, H. K. and Romanowicz, R. J.: The critical role of uncertainty in projections of hydrological extremes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4245–4258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4245-2017, 2017.
Met Office: UK Climate Projections: Headline Findings, Exeter,
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/binaries/content/assets/metofficegovuk/pdf/research/ukcp/ukcp-headline-findings-v2.pdf (last access: 17 October 2022), 2019.
Met Office: Regional (12 km) and Local (2.2 km) Projections, https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/collaboration/ukcp/high-res-projections, last access: 30 June 2020.
Met Office Hadley Centre: UKCP18 Regional Climate Model Projections for the UK, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/b4d24b3df3754b9d9028447eb3cd89c6 (last access: 26 October 2022), 2018.
Met Office Hadley Centre: UKCP18 Guidance: Data availability, access and
formats, https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/binaries/content/assets/metofficegovuk/pdf/research/ukcp/ukcp18-guidance-data-availability-access-and-formats.pdf (last access: 17 October 2022), 2019.
Mizukami, N., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Gutmann, E. D.,
Nijssen, B., Rakovec, O., and Samaniego, L.: Towards seamless large-domain
parameter estimation for hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 53,
8020–8040, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020401, 2017.
Moon, H., Gudmundsson, L., Guillod, B. P., Venugopal, V., and
Seneviratne, S. I.: Intercomparison of daily precipitation persistence in
multiple global observations and climate models, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 105009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4169, 2019.
Murphy, J. M., Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M. H., Kendon, E. J., Bett, P. E.,
Clark, R. T., Eagle, K. E., Fosser, G., Fung, F., Lowe, J. A., McDonald, R.
E., McInnes, R. N., McSweeney, C. F., Mitchell, J. F. B., Rostron, J. W.,
Thornton, H. E., Tucker, S., and Yamazaki, K.: UKCP18 Land
Projections: Science Report,
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Land-report.pdf (last access: 17 October 2022), 2018.
De Niel, J., Van Uytven, E., and Willems, P.: Uncertainty Analysis of Climate
Change Impact on River Flow Extremes Based on a Large Multi-Model Ensemble,
Water Resour. Manag., 33, 4319–4333, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02370-0,
2019.
Nikulin, G., Kjellström, E., Hansson, U., Strandberg, G., and Ullerstig,
A.: Evaluation and future projections of temperature, precipitation and wind
extremes over Europe in an ensemble of regional climate simulations, Tellus, 63, 41–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00466.x, 2011.
Ning, L., Mann, M. E., Crane, R., and Wagener, T.: Probabilistic projections
of climate change for the mid-Atlantic region of the United States:
Validation of precipitation downscaling during the historical era, J. Climate,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4091.1, 2012.
Petrow, T. and Merz, B.: Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and
seasonality in Germany in the period 1951–2002, J. Hydrol., 371, 129–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.024, 2009.
Pool, S., Vis, M., and Seibert, J.: Evaluating model performance: towards a
non-parametric variant of the Kling-Gupta efficiency, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 1941–1953, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002, 2018.
Prudhomme, C. and Davies, H.: Assessing uncertainties in climate change
impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: future climate,
Clim. Change, 93, 197–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9461-6, 2009.
Prudhomme, C. and Williamson, J.: Derivation of RCM-driven potential evapotranspiration for hydrological climate change impact analysis in Great Britain: a comparison of methods and associated uncertainty in future projections, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1365–1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1365-2013, 2013.
Prudhomme, C., Young, A., Watts, G., Haxton, T., Crooks, S., Williamson, J.,
Davies, H., Dadson, S., and Allen, S.: The drying up of Britain? A national
estimate of changes in seasonal river flows from 11 Regional Climate Model
simulations, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1115–1118, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8434,
2012.
Reynard, N. S., Kay, A. L., Anderson, M., Donovan, B., and Duckworth, C.: The
evolution of climate change guidance for fluvial flood risk management in
England, Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ., 41, 222–237,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317702566, 2017.
Robinson, E. L., Blyth, E. M., Clark, D. B., Comyn-Platt, E., and Rudd, A.: Climate
hydrology and ecology research support system potential evapotranspiration
dataset for Great Britain (1961–2012) [CHESS-PE], NERC Environmental Information Data Centre [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/8baf805d-39ce-4dac-b224-c926ada353b7, 2020.
Rudd, A. C., Kay, A. L., and Bell, V. A.: National-scale analysis of future
river flow and soil moisture droughts: potential changes in drought
characteristics, Clim. Change, 156, 323–340,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02528-0, 2019.
Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., and Attinger, S.: Multiscale parameter
regionalization of a grid-based hydrologic model at the mesoscale, Water
Resour. Res., 46, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007327, 2010.
Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., Thober, S., Rakovec, O., Zink, M., Wanders, N., Eisner, S., Müller Schmied, H., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Attinger, S.: Toward seamless hydrologic predictions across spatial scales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4323–4346, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4323-2017, 2017.
Sawicz, K. A., Kelleher, C., Wagener, T., Troch, P., Sivapalan, M., and Carrillo, G.: Characterizing hydrologic change through catchment classification, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-273-2014, 2014.
Schwalm, C. R., Glendon, S., and Duffy, P. B.: RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO2
emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 19656–19657,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007117117, 2020.
Seibert, J., Vis, M. J. P., Lewis, E., and van Meerveld, H. J.: Upper and
lower benchmarks in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Process., 32,
1120–1125, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11476, 2018.
Sharma, A., Wasko, C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: If Precipitation Extremes Are
Increasing, Why Aren't Floods?, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8545–8551,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023749, 2018.
Shrestha, B., Cochrane, T. A., Caruso, B. S., Arias, M. E., and Piman, T.: Uncertainty in flow and sediment projections due to future climate scenarios for the 3S Rivers in the Mekong Basin, J. Hydrol., 540, 1088–1104, 2016.
Shuttleworth, W. J.: Terrestrial Hydrometeorology, John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd, Chichester, UK, ISBN 978-0-470-65937-3, 2012.
Singh, R., van Werkhoven, K., and Wagener, T.: Hydrological impacts of
climate change in gauged and ungauged watersheds of the Olifants basin: a
trading-space-for-time approach, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 59, 29–55,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.819431, 2014.
Smith, A., Bates, P., Freer, J., and Wetterhall, F.: Investigating the
application of climate models in flood projection across the UK, Hydrol.
Process., 28, 2810–2823, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9815, 2014.
Svensson, C., Kundzewicz, Z. W., and Maurer, T.: Trend detection in river
flow series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 50, 824,
https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.2005.50.5.811, 2005.
Tanguy, M., Dixon, H., Prosdocimi, I., Morris, D., and Keller, V. D. J.:
Gridded estimates of daily and monthly areal rainfall for the United Kingdom
(1890–2012) [CEH-GEAR], NERC Environmental Information Data Centre [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/5dc179dc-f692-49ba-9326-a6893a503f6e, 2014.
Teutschbein, C. and Seibert, J.: Bias correction of regional climate model
simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and
evaluation of different methods, J. Hydrol., 456–457, 12–29,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052, 2012.
Thober, S., Kumar, R., Wanders, N., Marx, A., Pan, M., Rakovec, O.,
Samaniego, L., Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Zink, M.: Multi-model ensemble
projections of European river floods and high flows at 1.5, 2, and 3 degrees
global warming, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 014003,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e35, 2018.
Trenberth, K.: Changes in precipitation with climate change, Clim. Res.,
47, 123–138, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953, 2011.
Veijalainen, N., Lotsari, E., Alho, P., Vehviläinen, B., and
Käyhkö, J.: National scale assessment of climate change impacts on
flooding in Finland, J. Hydrol., 391, 333–350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.035, 2010.
Velázquez, J. A., Schmid, J., Ricard, S., Muerth, M. J., Gauvin St-Denis, B., Minville, M., Chaumont, D., Caya, D., Ludwig, R., and Turcotte, R.: An ensemble approach to assess hydrological models' contribution to uncertainties in the analysis of climate change impact on water resources, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 565–578, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-565-2013, 2013.
Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., McGlynn, B. L., Harman, C. J.,
Gupta, H. V., Kumar, P., Rao, P. S. C., Basu, N. B., and Wilson, J. S.: The
future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world, Water Resour.
Res., 46, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008906, 2010.
Wang, G. Q., Zhang, J. Y., Jin, J. L., Pagano, T. C., Calow, R., Bao, Z. X., Liu, C. S., Liu, Y. L., and Yan, X. L.: Assessing water resources in China using PRECIS projections and a VIC model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 231–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-231-2012, 2012.
Watts, G., Battarbee, R. W., Bloomfield, J. P., Crossman, J., Daccache, A.,
Durance, I., Elliott, J. A., Garner, G., Hannaford, J., Hannah, D. M., Hess,
T., Jackson, C. R., Kay, A. L., Kernan, M., Knox, J., Mackay, J., Monteith,
D. T., Ormerod, S. J., Rance, J., Stuart, M. E., Wade, A. J., Wade, S. D.,
Weatherhead, K., Whitehead, P. G., and Wilby, R. L.: Climate change and water
in the UK – past changes and future prospects, Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth
Environ., 39, 6–28, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314542957, 2015.
Wilby, R. L. and Harris, I.: A framework for assessing uncertainties in
climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK, Water
Resour. Res., 42, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004065, 2006.
Short summary
This study modelled the impact of climate change on river high flows across Great Britain (GB). Generally, results indicated an increase in the magnitude and frequency of high flows along the west coast of GB by 2050–2075. In contrast, average flows decreased across GB. All flow projections contained large uncertainties; the climate projections were the largest source of uncertainty overall but hydrological modelling uncertainties were considerable in some regions.
This study modelled the impact of climate change on river high flows across Great Britain (GB)....
