Articles | Volume 28, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024
Research article
 | 
12 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 12 Sep 2024

Making a case for power-sensitive water modelling: a literature review

Rozemarijn ter Horst, Rossella Alba, Jeroen Vos, Maria Rusca, Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Lucie V. Babel, Gert Jan Veldwisch, Jean-Philippe Venot, Bruno Bonté, David W. Walker, and Tobias Krueger

Related authors

Drivers of global irrigation expansion: the role of discrete global grid choice
Sophie Wagner, Fabian Stenzel, Tobias Krueger, and Jana de Wiljes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5049–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5049-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5049-2024, 2024
Short summary
A hybrid data-driven approach to analyze the drivers of lake level dynamics
Márk Somogyvári, Dieter Scherer, Frederik Bart, Ute Fehrenbach, Akpona Okujeni, and Tobias Krueger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4331–4348, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4331-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Review article: Co-creating knowledge for drought impact assessment in socio-hydrology
Silvia De Angeli, Lorenzo Villani, Giulio Castelli, Maria Rusca, Giorgio Boni, Elena Bresci, and Luigi Piemontese
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2207,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2207, 2024
Short summary
From insufficient rainfall to livelihoods: understanding the cascade of drought impacts and policy implications
Louise Cavalcante, David W. Walker, Sarra Kchouk, Germano Ribeiro Neto, Taís Maria Nunes Carvalho, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Wieke Pot, Art Dewulf, and Pieter van Oel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-650,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-650, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: Drought impacts as failed prospects
Germano G. Ribeiro Neto, Sarra Kchouk, Lieke A. Melsen, Louise Cavalcante, David W. Walker, Art Dewulf, Alexandre C. Costa, Eduardo S. P. R. Martins, and Pieter R. van Oel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4217–4225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Determining the threshold of issuing flash flood warnings based on people's response process simulation
Ruikang Zhang, Dedi Liu, Lihua Xiong, Jie Chen, Hua Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5229–5247, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling water balance components of conifer species using the Noah-MP model in an eastern Mediterranean ecosystem
Mohsen Amini Fasakhodi, Hakan Djuma, Ioannis Sofokleous, Marinos Eliades, and Adriana Bruggeman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5209–5227, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5209-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5209-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessment of upscaling methodologies for daily crop transpiration using sap flows and two-source energy balance models in almonds under different water statuses and production systems
Manuel Quintanilla-Albornoz, Xavier Miarnau, Ana Pelechá, Héctor Nieto, and Joaquim Bellvert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4797–4818, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024, 2024
Short summary
Developing water supply reservoir operating rules for large-scale hydrological modelling
Saskia Salwey, Gemma Coxon, Francesca Pianosi, Rosanna Lane, Chris Hutton, Michael Bliss Singer, Hilary McMillan, and Jim Freer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4203–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, 2024
Short summary
An investigation of anthropogenic influences on hydrologic connectivity using model stress tests
Amelie Herzog, Jost Hellwig, and Kerstin Stahl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4065–4083, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4065-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4065-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbott, M. B. and Vojinovic, Z.: Towards a hydroinformatics praxis in the service of social justice, J. Hydroinform., 16, 516–530, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.198, 2014. 
Addor, N. and Melsen, L. A.: Legacy, Rather Than Adequacy, Drives the Selection of Hydrological Models, Water Resour. Res., 55, 378–390, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022958, 2019. 
Alam, M. F., McClain, M., Sikka, A., and Pande, S.: Understanding human–water feedbacks of interventions in agricultural systems with agent based models: A review, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 103003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac91e1, 2022. 
Andersson, L.: Experiences of the use of riverine nutrient models in stakeholder dialogues, Int. J. Water Resour. D., 20, 399–413, https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062042000248547, 2004. 
Babel, L. and Vinck, D.: The “sticky air method” in geodynamics: Modellers dealing with the constraints of numerical modelling, Rev. Anthropol. Connaiss., 16, https://doi.org/10.4000/rac.27795, 2022. 
Download
Short summary
The exact power of models often remains hidden, especially when neutrality is claimed. Our review of 61 scientific articles shows that in the scientific literature little attention is given to the power of water models to influence development processes and outcomes. However, there is a lot to learn from those who are openly reflexive. Based on lessons from the review, we call for power-sensitive modelling, which means that people are critical about how models are made and with what effects.