Articles | Volume 28, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2259-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2259-2024
Research article
 | 
30 May 2024
Research article |  | 30 May 2024

Leveraging multi-variable observations to reduce and quantify the output uncertainty of a global hydrological model: evaluation of three ensemble-based approaches for the Mississippi River basin

Petra Döll, Howlader Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Kerstin Schulze, Helena Gerdener, Lara Börger, Somayeh Shadkam, Sebastian Ackermann, Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, Hannes Müller Schmied, Andreas Güntner, and Jürgen Kusche

Related authors

How can observational data be used to improve the modeling of human-managed reservoirs in large-scale hydrological models?
Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari and Petra Döll
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-291,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-291, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Software sustainability of global impact models
Emmanuel Nyenah, Petra Döll, Daniel S. Katz, and Robert Reinecke
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-97,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-97, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Quantifying and communicating uncertain climate change hazards in participatory climate change adaptation processes
Laura Müller and Petra Döll
Geosci. Commun., 7, 121–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-121-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-121-2024, 2024
Short summary
The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2e: description and evaluation of modifications and new features
Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Sebastian Ackermann, Denise Cáceres, Martina Flörke, Helena Gerdener, Ellen Kynast, Thedini Asali Peiris, Leonie Schiebener, Maike Schumacher, and Petra Döll
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-213,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-213, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of WGHM in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins
H. M. Mehedi Hasan, Petra Döll, Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, Fabrice Papa, and Andreas Güntner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2324,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2324, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Information content of soil hydrology in a west Amazon watershed as informed by GRACE
Elias C. Massoud, A. Anthony Bloom, Marcos Longo, John T. Reager, Paul A. Levine, and John R. Worden
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1407–1423, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1407-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Diagnostic evaluation of river discharge into the Arctic Ocean and its impact on oceanic volume transports
Susanna Winkelbauer, Michael Mayer, Vanessa Seitner, Ervin Zsoter, Hao Zuo, and Leopold Haimberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 279–304, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-279-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-279-2022, 2022
Short summary
The 63-year changes in annual streamflow volumes across Europe with a focus on the Mediterranean basin
Daniele Masseroni, Stefania Camici, Alessio Cislaghi, Giorgio Vacchiano, Christian Massari, and Luca Brocca
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5589–5601, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5589-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5589-2021, 2021
Short summary
Multivariable evaluation of land surface processes in forced and coupled modes reveals new error sources to the simulated water cycle in the IPSL (Institute Pierre Simon Laplace) climate model
Hiroki Mizuochi, Agnès Ducharne, Frédérique Cheruy, Josefine Ghattas, Amen Al-Yaari, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Vladislav Bastrikov, Philippe Peylin, Fabienne Maignan, and Nicolas Vuichard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2199–2221, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2199-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2199-2021, 2021
Implications of model selection: a comparison of publicly available, conterminous US-extent hydrologic component estimates
Samuel Saxe, William Farmer, Jessica Driscoll, and Terri S. Hogue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1529–1568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1529-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1529-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Henrichs, T., Kaspar, F., Lehner, B., Rösch, T., and Siebert, S.: Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 317–338, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.317.45290, 2003. 
Beven, K.: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 41–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E, 1993. 
Beven, K.: Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system, Hydrol. Process., 16, 189–206, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.343, 2002. 
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. 
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: GLUE. 20 years on, Hydrol. Process., 28, 5897–5918, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10082, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Currently, global hydrological models do not benefit from observations of model output variables to reduce and quantify model output uncertainty. For the Mississippi River basin, we explored three approaches for using both streamflow and total water storage anomaly observations to adjust the parameter sets in a global hydrological model. We developed a method for considering the observation uncertainties to quantify the uncertainty of model output and provide recommendations.