Articles | Volume 26, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5103-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5103-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Cooperation under conflict: participatory hydrological modeling for science policy dialogues for the Aculeo Lake
Anahi Ocampo-Melgar
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Pilar Barría
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Cristián Chadwick
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
Cesar Rivas
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Related authors
No articles found.
Sebastian Aedo-Quililongo, Cristian Chadwick, Fernando González-Leiva, and Jorge Gironás
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-890, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-890, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Global and regional climate model outputs need to be bias corrected to assess climate change impacts at local scales. Although several bias correction methods exist, none of them is perfect and users must assess the trade-off of these methods. As there are no coding packages that allow an even comparison, we developed an easy-to-use package to compare among methods, allowing users to identify the most adequate for each situation and include this analysis in their workflow.
Claudio Andrés Sandoval, Jorge Alfredo Gironás, and Cristián Chadwick
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2710, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2710, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a framework to evaluate methods that convert daily rainfall data into hourly values, focusing on how well they represent extreme rainfall. Applying this framework to five locations with different climates revealed that no single method performs best everywhere. The results provide practical guidance for researchers, engineers, and decision-makers involved in designing infrastructure and managing flood risk under limited data conditions.
Cited articles
Abels, G.: Citizen Involvement in Public Policy-making: Does it Improve
Democratic Legitimacy and Accountability? The Case of pTA, Interdisciplin. Inf. Sci., 13, 103–116, https://doi.org/10.4036/iis.2007.103, 2007.
Arnstein, S. R.: A Ladder Of Citizen Participation, J. Am. Inst. Plan., 35, 216–224, 1969.
Arvai, J.: Using risk communication to disclose the outcome of a participatory decision-making process: Effects on the perceived acceptibility of risk-policy decisions, Risk Anal., 23, 281–289, 2003.
Babidge, S.: Contested value and an ethics of resources: Water, mining and
indigenous people in the Atacama Desert, Chile, Aust. J. Anthropol., 27,
84–103, https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12139, 2016.
Barría, P., Chadwick, C., Ocampo-Melgar, A., Diaz, R., Galleguillos, M., and Poblete, D.: Estudio de balance hídrico en la cuenca laguna de Aculeo, Proyecto FIC-R 2017 código BIP 40002646-0, Caracterización del consumo hídrico y del sistema hidrogeológico en la cuenca de Aculeo, determinación de posibles soluciones y campaña de educación Ambiental, Report for the Regional Government, ISBN 978-956-402-790-6, 2020.
Barría, P., Chadwick, C., Ocampo-Melgar, A., Galleguillos, M., Garreaud, R., Díaz-Vasconcellos, R., Poblete, D., Rubio-Álvarez, E., and Poblete-Caballero, D.: Water management or megadrought: what caused the
Chilean Aculeo Lake drying?, Reg. Environ. Change, 21, 19, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01750-w, 2021.
Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., and Giardino, A.:
Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water
resources management, Environ. Model. Softw., 91, 95–110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014, 2017.
Bauer, C. J.: Siren song: Chilean water law as a model for international
reform, Resources For the Future Press Book, Washington, DC, ISBN 9781891853791, 2004.
Bellisario, A.: The Chilean agrarian transformation: Agrarian reform and
capitalist “partial” counter-agrarian reform, 1964–1980. Part 1:
Reformism, socialism and free-market neoliberalism, J. Agrar. Change, 7,
1–34, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00138.x, 2007.
Bhave, A. G., Mishra, A., and Raghuwanshi, N. S.: A combined bottom-up and
top-down approach for assessment of climate change adaptation options, J.
Hydrol., 518, 150–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.039, 2014.
Bluedot: Asesoría Hidrogeológica para la Consolidación de un Modelo Hidrogeológico de la Cuenca de Aculeo, Elaborado para la Facultade de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 2020.
Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., and Wester, P.:
Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective, Water Int., 41,
1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898, 2016.
Bown, H. E. and Fuentes, J. P.: Hacia la reducción del consumo de agua en
áreas verdes urbanas en la Región Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile, p. 99, ISBN 978-956-404-628-0, 2021.
Brewer, G. D. G. and Stern, P. C.: Decision making for the environment:
Social and behavioral science research priorities, Making, Environmental
Decision Dimensions, Human Change, Global Isbn, Council Pdf, This Press,
National Academies Academy, http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JeYKuQl3mCUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Decision+making+for+the+environment:+Social+and+behavioral+science+research+priorities&ots=52In3d5qB4&sig=aONXSgXFOtnyqwdEXeGdWDC_ml0 (last access: 9 December 2012), 2005.
Bruns, B. R.: Water Tenure Reform: Developing an Extended Ladder of Participation, Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practice, in: RCSD Conference, 11–14 July 2003, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2003.
Budds, J.: Whose Scarcity? The Hydrosocial Cycle and the Changing Waterscape
of La Ligua River Basin, Chile, in: chap. 4, Contentious Geographies Environmental Knowledge, Meaning, Scale, edited by: Goodman, M. K., Boykoff, M. T., and Evered, K. T., Routledge, 59–78, ISBN 9781138275591, 2008.
Cannon, A. J., Sobie, S. R., and Murdock, T. Q.: Bias correction of GCM precipitation by quantile mapping: how well do methods preserve changes in quantiles and extremes?, J. Climate, 28, 6938–6959, 2015.
Cash, D. W., Borck, J. C., and Patt, A. G.: Countering the Loading-Dock
Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making: Comparative Analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Forecasting Systems, Sci. Technol. Human
Values, 31, 465–494, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906287547, 2006.
Clark, W. C. and Cash, D.: From Science to Policy: Assessing the Assessment Process, KSG Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP01-045, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, November 2001.
DGA: Catálogo público, Dirección General de Aguas, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, https://dga.mop.gob.cl/Paginas/default.aspx (last access: 10 October 2022.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J.: Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 739–755, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L, 1993.
Galloway, G. E.: If Stationarity is Dead, What Do We Do Now?, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 47, 563–570, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00550.x, 2011.
Garreaud, R. D., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Barichivich, J., Pablo Boisier, J.,
Christie, D., Galleguillos, M., LeQuesne, C., McPhee, J., and Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.: The 2010–2015 megadrought in central Chile: Impacts
on regional hydroclimate and vegetation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21,
6307–6327, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017, 2017.
Garreaud, R. D., Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Montecinos, A., Sepúlveda, H. H., and Veloso-Aguila, D.: The Central Chile Mega Drought
(2010–2018): A climate dynamics perspective, Int. J. Climatol., 2019, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219, 2019.
Goleman, D. J.: What is negative about positive illusions? When benefits for the individual harm the collective, J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 8, 190–197,
https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1989.8.2.190, 1989.
Gorddard, R., Colloff, M. J., Wise, R. M., Ware, D., and Dunlop, M.: Values,
rules and knowledge: Adaptation as change in the decision context, Environ.
Sci. Policy, 57, 60–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.004, 2016.
Hegger, D., Lamers, M., Van Zeijl-Rozema, A., and Dieperink, C.: Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: Success conditions and levers for action, Environ. Sci. Policy, 18, 52–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002, 2012.
Hermans, C., Erickson, J., Noordewier, T., Sheldon, A., and Kline, M.:
Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of
multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont, J.
Environ. Manage., 84, 534–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.013, 2007.
Kahan, D.: Fixing the communications failure, Nature, 463, 296–297, https://doi.org/10.1038/463(21296a, 2010.
Kiparsky, M., Milman, A., and Vicuña, S.: Climate and Water: Knowledge of
Impacts to Action on Adaptation, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 37, 163–194, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-050311-093931, 2012.
Madaleno, I. M. and Gurovich, A.: Conflicting water usages in Northern Chile, Bol. La Asoc. Geogr. Esp., 45, 439–443, 2007.
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., and Moore, H.: Transdisciplinary global change research: The
co-creation of knowledge for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.,
5, 420–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001, 2013.
McMillan, H., Montanari, A., Cudennec, C., Savenije, H., Kreibich, H.,
Krueger, T., Liu, J., Mejia, A., Van Loon, A., Aksoy, H., Di Baldassarre, G., Huang, Y., Mazvimavi, D., Rogger, M., Sivakumar, B., Bibikova, T., Castellarin, A., Chen, Y., Finger, D., Gelfan, A., Hannah, D. M., Hoekstra,
A. Y., Li, H., Maskey, S., Mathevet, T., Mijic, A., Acuña, A. P., Polo,
M. J., Rosales, V., Smith, P., Viglione, A., Srinivasan, V., Toth, E., van Nooyen, R., and Xia, J.: Panta Rhei 2013–2015: Global perspectives on
hydrology, society and change, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 61, 1174–1191,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1159308, 2016.
Melsen, L. A., Vos, J., and Boelens, R.: What is the role of the model in
socio-hydrology? Discussion of “Prediction in a socio-hydrological
world”, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 1435–1443, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1499025, 2018.
Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Zbigniew,
W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity Is Dead: Whither
Water Management?, Science, 319, 573–574, 2008.
Mostert, E.: The challenge of public participation, Water Policy, 5, 179–197, https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2003.0011, 2003.
Nardi, F., Cudennec, C., Abrate, T., Allouch, C., Annis, A., Assumpção, T., Aubert, A. H., Bérod, D., Braccini, A. M.,
Buytaert, W., Dasgupta, A., Hannah, D. M., Mazzoleni, M., Polo, M. J.,
Sæbø, Ø., Seibert, J., Tauro, F., Teichert, F., Teutonico, R.,
Uhlenbrook, S., Wahrmann Vargas, C., and Grimaldi, S.: Citizens AND HYdrology
(CANDHY): conceptualizing a transdisciplinary framework for citizen science
addressing hydrological challenges, Hydrolog. Sci. J., https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1849707, in press, 2021.
Nie, M.: Drivers of Natural Resource-Based Political Conflict, Policy Sci.,
36, 307–341, 2010.
Nisbet, M. C.: Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public
Engagement, Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev., 51, 12–23,
https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23, 2009.
Ocampo-Melgar, A., Barria, P., Chadwick, C., and Villoch, P.: Restoration
perceptions and collaboration challenges under severe water scarcity: the
Aculeo Lake process, Restor. Ecol., 29, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13337, 2021.
Ocampo-Melgar, A., Barria, P., Chadwick, C., and Diaz-Vasconcellos, R.: Rural transformation and differential vulnerability: Exploring adaptation strategies to water scarcity in the Aculeo Lake basin (Chile), Front. Environ. Sci., 10, 955023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955023, 2022.
Órdenes, M. and Díaz-Diego, J.: Cuando la mano de obra se subleva:
estrategias terratenientes durante la reforma agraria chilena (1964–1973),
Hist. Agrar. Rev. Agric. Hist. Rural, 74, 201–230,
https://doi.org/10.26882/histagrar.074e07o, 2018.
Pellizzoni, L.: Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy, Environ. Values,
12, 195–224, 2012.
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Palmer, M. A., Hart, D. D., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Rogers, K. H., Meyer, J. L., and Stanford, J. A.: River
flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making,
Front. Ecol. Environ., 4, 298–306, 2003.
Poff, N. L., Brown, C. M., Grantham, T. E., Matthews, J. H., Palmer, M. A.,
Spence, C. M., Wilby, R. L., Haasnoot, M., Mendoza, G. F., Dominique, K. C.,
and Baeza, A.: Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with
eco-engineering decision scaling, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 25–34,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2765, 2016.
Rice, J. L., Woodhouse, C. A., and Lukas, J. J.: Science and Decision Making:
Water Management and Tree-Ring Data in the Western United States, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45, 1248–1259, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00358.x, 2009.
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J.: Public Participation Methods: A Framework for
Evaluation, Sci. Technol. Human Values, 25, 3–29,
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101, 2000.
Salter, J., Robinson, J., and Wiek, A.: Participatory methods of integrated
assessment – A review, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Clim. Change, 1, 697–717,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.73, 2010.
Scott, C. A., Varady, R. G., Meza, F., Montaña, E., de Raga, G. B.,
Luckman, B., and Martius, C.: Science-Policy Dialogues for Water Security:
Addressing Vulnerability and Adaptation to Global Change in the Arid
Americas, Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev., 54, 30–42,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2012.673454, 2012.
Somerville, R. C. and Hassol, S. J.: Communicating the science of climate change, Phys. Today, 64, 48, https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1296, 2011.
Stirling, A.: Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure
in participatory multi-criteria analysis, Land Use Policy, 23, 95–107,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010, 2006.
Trimble, M., Jacobi, P. R., Olivier, T., Pascual, M. A., Zurbriggen, C.,
Garrido, L., and Mazzeo, N.: Reconfiguring water governance for resilient
social-ecological systems in South America, in: Water resilience: management and governance in times of change, edited by: Baird, J. and Plummer, R., Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 113–135, ISBN 978-3-030-48110-0, 2021.
Van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J. F., Masui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., and Rose, S. K.: The representative concentration pathways: an overview, Climatic Change, 109, 5–31, 2011.
Varela-Ortega, C., Blanco-Gutierrez, I., Swartz, C., and Downing, T.: Balancing groundwater conservation and rural livelihoods under water and
climate uncertainties: An integrated hydro-economic modeling framework,
Global Environ. Change, 21, 604–619, 2011.
Vogel, C., Moser, S., Kasperson, R., and Dabelgo, G.: Linking vulnerability,
adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and
partnerships, Global Environ. Change, 17, 349–363, 2007.
Voinov, A. and Bousquet, F.: Modelling with stakeholders, Environ. Model.
Softw., 25, 1268–1281, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007, 2010.
Voinov, A. and Gaddis, E. J. B.: Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners, Ecol. Model., 216, 197–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.010, 2008.
Weible, C. M., Pattison, A., and Sabatier, P. A.: Harnessing expert-based
information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 522–534,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.005, 2010.
Wilson, R. S. and Arvai, J. L.: Policy Analysis Evaluating the Quality of
Structured Environmental Management Decisions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4831–4837, 2006.
Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Stafford Smith, M., Park, S. E., Eakin, H. C., Archer Van Garderen, E. R. M., and Campbell, B.: Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response, Global Environ.
Change, 28, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002, 2014.
Yates, D., Iwra, M., and Institute-boston, S. E.: Planning Model Part 2:
Aiding Freshwater Ecosystem Service Evaluation, Water Int., 30, 501–512, 2005a.
Yates, D., Iwra, M., and Institute-boston, S. E.: WEAP21 – A Demand-,
Priority-, and Preference-Driven Water Planning Model Part 1: Model
Characteristics, Water Int., 30, 487–500, 2005b.
Short summary
This article examines how a hydrological model exploring the causes of a lake desiccation was turned into a 5-step participatory process to better adjust the model to address questions that were causing suspicions and conflicts in the community. Although the process was key in finding a combination of strategies that were of moderate impact and higher local acceptability, we address the challenges of such collaboration in modeling when conflict is deeply embedded in the context.
This article examines how a hydrological model exploring the causes of a lake desiccation was...