Articles | Volume 26, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1203-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Quantifying input uncertainty in the calibration of water quality models: reordering errors via the secant method
Related authors
Cited articles
Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., and Sorooshian, S.: An integrated hydrologic
Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and
model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction, Water Resour.
Res., 43, W01403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004745, 2007.
Baldwin, A. K., Robertson, D. M., Saad, D. A., and Magruder, C.: Refinement
of Regression Models to Estimate Real-Time Concentrations of Contaminants in
the Menomonee River Drainage Basin, Southeast Wisconsin, 2008–11, in: US
Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5174, US Geological
Survey Reston, Virginia, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20135174,
2013.
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model
calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992.
Bonhomme, C. and Petrucci, G.: Should we trust build-up/wash-off water
quality models at the scale of urban catchments?, Water Res., 108,
422–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.027, 2017.
Chaudhary, A. and Hantush, M. M.: Bayesian Monte Carlo and maximum
likelihood approach for uncertainty estimation and risk management:
Application to lake oxygen recovery model, Water Res., 108, 301–311,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.012, 2017.