Articles | Volume 25, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5839–5858, 2021
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5839–5858, 2021

Research article 11 Nov 2021

Research article | 11 Nov 2021

Modeling and interpreting hydrological responses of sustainable urban drainage systems with explainable machine learning methods

Yang Yang and Ting Fong May Chui

Related authors

Assessing the hydrologic restoration of an urbanized area via an integrated distributed hydrological model
D. H. Trinh and T. F. M. Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4789–4801,,, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Urban Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood frequency over a small urban watershed: an approach coupling stochastic storm transposition and hydrologic modeling
Zhengzheng Zhou, James A. Smith, Mary Lynn Baeck, Daniel B. Wright, Brianne K. Smith, and Shuguang Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4701–4717,,, 2021
Short summary
Space variability impacts on hydrological responses of nature-based solutions and the resulting uncertainty: a case study of Guyancourt (France)
Yangzi Qiu, Igor da Silva Rocha Paz, Feihu Chen, Pierre-Antoine Versini, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3137–3162,,, 2021
Short summary
Urban surface water flood modelling – a comprehensive review of current models and future challenges
Kaihua Guo, Mingfu Guan, and Dapeng Yu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2843–2860,,, 2021
Short summary
Resampling and ensemble techniques for improving ANN-based high-flow forecast accuracy
Everett Snieder, Karen Abogadil, and Usman T. Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2543–2566,,, 2021
Short summary
Evaluating different machine learning methods to simulate runoff from extensive green roofs
Elhadi Mohsen Hassan Abdalla, Vincent Pons, Virginia Stovin, Simon De-Ville, Elizabeth Fassman-Beck, Knut Alfredsen, and Tone Merete Muthanna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS

Cited articles

Ahmad, M. A., Teredesai, A., and Eckert, C.: Interpretable machine learning in healthcare, in: Proceedings – 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, ICHI 2018, p. 447, 4 to 7 June 2018, New York City, NY, USA, 2018. 
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., and Herrera, F.: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, Inf. Fusion, 58, 82–115,, 2020. 
Beven, K. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29,, 2001. 
Bischl, B., Richter, J., Bossek, J., Horn, D., Thomas, J., and Lang, M.: mlrMBO: A Modular Framework for Model-Based Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions, arXiv [preprint], arXiv:1703.03373v3, 2017. 
Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A., Paz, D. L., and Szlam, A.: Optimizing the latent space of generative networks, in: 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, vol. 2, 960–972, Stockholm, Sweden, 10 to 15 July 2018, 2018. 
Short summary
This study uses explainable machine learning methods to model and interpret the statistical correlations between rainfall and the discharge of urban catchments with sustainable urban drainage systems. The resulting models have good prediction accuracies. However, the right predictions may be made for the wrong reasons as the model cannot provide physically plausible explanations as to why a prediction is made.