Dear Authors,
reading the answers to the comments of the two Referees, I can see that you are going to seriously address them, with a thorough revision of the mauscript. I especially appreciate your efforts in reorganizing and simplfying the paper to make it more readable, modifying the part of model training to make it fully automated, the updated literture review.
Therefore, I look forward to receiving the revised version.
Best regards,
Roberto Greco

Dear Authors,
although your manuscript has been clearly imrpoved compared to the original version, the Referee still raises some issues that deserve further revision. Specifically, shortening of the paper is recommended, removing or summarizing not essential parts, while more effort must be made to justify the recourse to machine learning for this kind of problem, as well as to highlight the novel aspects of the proposed approach.
Please, carefully consider all the comments before submitting a revised version, and address the raised issues or provide a convincing rebuttal in case you disagree.
I look forward to receiving a further revised version of the paper.
Best regards,
Roberto Greco

Dear Authors,
an expert Referee evaluated the second revised version of your manuscript, and recognises that all the remaining issues have been satisfactorily addressed.
Hence, I am pleased to inform you that the revised manuscript is accepted for publication in HESS.
Best regards
Roberto Greco