Articles | Volume 21, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3915-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3915-2017
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
31 Jul 2017
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 31 Jul 2017

An intercomparison of approaches for improving operational seasonal streamflow forecasts

Pablo A. Mendoza, Andrew W. Wood, Elizabeth Clark, Eric Rothwell, Martyn P. Clark, Bart Nijssen, Levi D. Brekke, and Jeffrey R. Arnold

Related authors

Benchmarking convection-permitting climate simulations for hydrological applications: A comparative study of WRF-SAAG and observation-based products
Sofía Segovia, Pablo A. Mendoza, Miguel Lagos-Zúñiga, Lucía Scaff, and Andreas Prein
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3061,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3061, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Technical note: What does the Standardized Streamflow Index actually reflect? Insights and implications for hydrological drought analysis
Fabián Lema, Pablo A. Mendoza, Nicolás A. Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1981–2002, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025, 2025
Short summary
How well do hydrological models simulate streamflow extremes and drought-to-flood transitions?
Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, Bailey J. Anderson, Paul C. Astagneau, Daniel L. Swain, Pablo A. Mendoza, and Manuela I. Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-781,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-781, 2025
Short summary
Towards robust seasonal streamflow forecasts in mountainous catchments: impact of calibration metric selection in hydrological modeling
Diego Araya, Pablo A. Mendoza, Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, and James McPhee
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4385–4408, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, 2023
Short summary
To what extent does river routing matter in hydrological modeling?
Nicolás Cortés-Salazar, Nicolás Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Pablo A. Mendoza, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3505–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Adaptation of root zone storage capacity to climate change and its effects on future streamflow in Alpine catchments: towards non-stationary model parameters
Magali Ponds, Sarah Hanus, Harry Zekollari, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Gerrit Schoups, Roland Kaitna, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3545–3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Finding process-behavioural parameterisations of a hydrological model using a multi-step process-based calibration and evaluation scheme
Moritz M. Heuer, Hadysa Mohajerani, and Markus C. Casper
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3503–3525, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3503-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3503-2025, 2025
Short summary
Merits and limits of SWAT-GL: application in contrasting glaciated catchments
Timo Schaffhauser, Florentin Hofmeister, Gabriele Chiogna, Fabian Merk, Ye Tuo, Julian Machnitzke, Lucas Alcamo, Jingshui Huang, and Markus Disse
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3227–3256, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3227-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3227-2025, 2025
Short summary
Hydrological regime index for non-perennial rivers
Pablo Fernando Dornes and Rocío Noelia Comas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2901–2923, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2901-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2901-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing the adequacy of traditional hydrological models for climate change impact studies: a case for long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks
Jean-Luc Martel, François Brissette, Richard Arsenault, Richard Turcotte, Mariana Castañeda-Gonzalez, William Armstrong, Edouard Mailhot, Jasmine Pelletier-Dumont, Gabriel Rondeau-Genesse, and Louis-Philippe Caron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2811–2836, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2811-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2811-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdi, H.: Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat., 2, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.051, 2010.
Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 19, 716–723, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705, 1974.
Anderson, E.: National Weather Service River Forecast system – snow accumulation and ablation model, NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS HYDRO-17, 217 pp., 1973.
Beckers, J. V. L., Weerts, A. H., Tijdeman, E., and Welles, E.: ENSO-conditioned weather resampling method for seasonal ensemble streamflow prediction, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3277–3287, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3277-2016, 2016.
BPA: 2010 Level Modified Streamflow: 1928–2008, DOE/BP-4352, Seasonal Volumes and Statistics, 2011.
Download
Short summary
Water supply forecasts are critical to support water resources operations and planning. The skill of such forecasts depends on our knowledge of (i) future meteorological conditions and (ii) the amount of water stored in a basin. We address this problem by testing several approaches that make use of these sources of predictability, either separately or in a combined fashion. The main goal is to understand the marginal benefits of both information and methodological complexity in forecast skill.
Share