- Articles & preprints
- Submission
- Policies
- Peer review
- Editorial board
- About
- EGU publications
- Manuscript tracking
Journal cover
Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
- Articles & preprints
- Submission
- Policies
- Peer review
- Editorial board
- About
- EGU publications
- Manuscript tracking
Journal metrics
IF5.153
IF 5-year
5.460
5.460
CiteScore
7.8
7.8
SNIP1.623
IPP4.91
SJR2.092
Scimago H
index123
index123
h5-index65
Abstracted/indexed
Abstracted/indexedSpecial issue
Short summary
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and analytical assessment of resilience in socio-hydrological contexts. We identify three framings of resilience for different human–water couplings, which have distinct application fields and are used for different water management challenges. To assess and improve socio-hydrological resilience in each type, we introduce a
resilience canvasas a heuristic tool to design bespoke management strategies.
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and...
Articles | Volume 21, issue 7
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3655–3670, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Panta Rhei: opinions and progress towards hydrology for a...
Special issue: HESS Opinions 2017
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3655–3670, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Opinion article 20 Jul 2017
Opinion article | 20 Jul 2017
HESS Opinions: A conceptual framework for assessing socio-hydrological resilience under change
Feng Mao et al.
Related authors
No articles found.
Paul C. Astagneau, Guillaume Thirel, Olivier Delaigue, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Juraj Parajka, Claudia C. Brauer, Alberto Viglione, Wouter Buytaert, and Keith J. Beven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-498, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-498, 2020
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
The R programming language has become an important tool for many applications in hydrology. In this study, we provide an analysis of some of the R tools providing hydrological models. Two aspects are uniformly investigated: the conceptualisation of the models and the practicality of their implementation for end-users. These comparisons aim at easing the choice of R tools for users and at improving their usability for hydrology modelling to support more transferable research.
Doris E. Wendt, Anne F. Van Loon, John P. Bloomfield, and David M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4853–4868, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4853-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4853-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater use changes the availability of groundwater, especially during droughts. This study investigates the impact of groundwater use on groundwater droughts. A methodological framework is presented that was developed and applied to the UK. We identified an asymmetric impact of groundwater use on droughts, which highlights the relation between short-term and long-term strategies for sustainable groundwater use.
Nicolas Massei, Daniel G. Kingston, David M. Hannah, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Bastien Dieppois, Manuel Fossa, Andreas Hartmann, David A. Lavers, and Benoit Laignel
Proc. IAHS, 383, 141–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-141-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-141-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents recent thoughts by members of EURO-FRIEND Water project 3 “Large-scale-variations in hydrological characteristics” about research needed to characterize and understand large-scale hydrology under global changes. Emphasis is put on the necessary efforts to better understand 1 – the impact of low-frequency climate variability on hydrological trends and extremes, 2 – the role of basin properties on modulating the climate signal producing hydrological responses on the basin scale.
Bentje Brauns, Daniela Cuba, John P. Bloomfield, David M. Hannah, Christopher Jackson, Ben P. Marchant, Benedikt Heudorfer, Anne F. Van Loon, Hélène Bessière, Bo Thunholm, and Gerhard Schubert
Proc. IAHS, 383, 297–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-297-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-297-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In Europe, ca. 65% of drinking water is groundwater. Its replenishment depends on rainfall, but droughts may cause groundwater levels to fall below normal. These
groundwater droughtscan limit supply, making it crucial to understand their regional connection. The Groundwater Drought Initiative (GDI) assesses spatial patterns in historic—recent groundwater droughts across Europe for the first time. Using an example dataset, we describe the background to the GDI and its methodological approach.
Adam S. Ward, Steven M. Wondzell, Noah M. Schmadel, Skuyler Herzog, Jay P. Zarnetske, Viktor Baranov, Phillip J. Blaen, Nicolai Brekenfeld, Rosalie Chu, Romain Derelle, Jennifer Drummond, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso, Emily Graham, David Hannah, Ciaran J. Harman, Jase Hixson, Julia L. A. Knapp, Stefan Krause, Marie J. Kurz, Jörg Lewandowski, Angang Li, Eugènia Martí, Melinda Miller, Alexander M. Milner, Kerry Neil, Luisa Orsini, Aaron I. Packman, Stephen Plont, Lupita Renteria, Kevin Roche, Todd Royer, Catalina Segura, James Stegen, Jason Toyoda, Jacqueline Wells, and Nathan I. Wisnoski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5199–5225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The movement of water and solutes between streams and their shallow, connected subsurface is important to many ecosystem functions. These exchanges are widely expected to vary with stream flow across space and time, but these assumptions are seldom tested across basin scales. We completed more than 60 experiments across a 5th-order river basin to document these changes, finding patterns in space but not time. We conclude space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not good assumptions.
Adam S. Ward, Jay P. Zarnetske, Viktor Baranov, Phillip J. Blaen, Nicolai Brekenfeld, Rosalie Chu, Romain Derelle, Jennifer Drummond, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso, Emily Graham, David Hannah, Ciaran J. Harman, Skuyler Herzog, Jase Hixson, Julia L. A. Knapp, Stefan Krause, Marie J. Kurz, Jörg Lewandowski, Angang Li, Eugènia Martí, Melinda Miller, Alexander M. Milner, Kerry Neil, Luisa Orsini, Aaron I. Packman, Stephen Plont, Lupita Renteria, Kevin Roche, Todd Royer, Noah M. Schmadel, Catalina Segura, James Stegen, Jason Toyoda, Jacqueline Wells, Nathan I. Wisnoski, and Steven M. Wondzell
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1567–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1567-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1567-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Studies of river corridor exchange commonly focus on characterization of the physical, chemical, or biological system. As a result, complimentary systems and context are often lacking, which may limit interpretation. Here, we present a characterization of all three systems at 62 sites in a 5th-order river basin, including samples of surface water, hyporheic water, and sediment. These data will allow assessment of interacting processes in the river corridor.
Jonathan D. Mackay, Nicholas E. Barrand, David M. Hannah, Stefan Krause, Christopher R. Jackson, Jez Everest, Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir, and Andrew R. Black
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1833–1865, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1833-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1833-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We project 21st century change and uncertainty in 25 river flow regime metrics (signatures) for a deglaciating river basin. The results show that glacier-fed river flow magnitude, timing and variability are sensitive to climate change and that projection uncertainty stems from incomplete understanding of future climate and glacier-hydrology processes. These findings indicate how impact studies can be better designed to provide more robust projections of river flow regime in glaciated basins.
Anoop Kumar Shukla, Chandra Shekhar Prasad Ojha, Ana Mijic, Wouter Buytaert, Shray Pathak, Rahul Dev Garg, and Satyavati Shukla
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4745–4770, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4745-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4745-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Geospatial technologies and OIP are promising tools to study the effect of demographic changes and LULC transformations on the spatiotemporal variations in the water quality (WQ) across a large river basin. Therefore, this study could help to assess and solve local and regional WQ-related problems over a river basin. It may help the policy makers and planners to understand the status of water pollution so that suitable strategies could be planned for sustainable development in a river basin.
Jonathan D. Mackay, Nicholas E. Barrand, David M. Hannah, Stefan Krause, Christopher R. Jackson, Jez Everest, and Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
The Cryosphere, 12, 2175–2210, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We apply a framework to compare and objectively accept or reject competing melt and run-off process models. We found no acceptable models. Furthermore, increasing model complexity does not guarantee better predictions. The results highlight model selection uncertainty and the need for rigorous frameworks to identify deficiencies in competing models. The application of this approach in the future will help to better quantify model prediction uncertainty and develop improved process models.
Gina Tsarouchi and Wouter Buytaert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1411–1435, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1411-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1411-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This work quantifies how future land-use and climate change may affect the hydrology of the Upper Ganges basin. Three sets of modelling experiments are run for the period 2000–2035, considering (1) only climate change, (2) only land-use change and (3) both climate and land-use change. Results point towards a severe increase in high flows. The changes are greater in the combined land-use and climate change experiment. We also show that future winter water demands in the region may not be met.
Faye L. Jackson, Robert J. Fryer, David M. Hannah, and Iain A. Malcolm
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4727–4745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4727-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4727-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
River temperature (Tw) is important to fish populations, but one cannot monitor everywhere. Thus, models are used to predict Tw, sometimes in rivers with no data. To date, the accuracy of these predictions has not been determined. We found that models including landscape predictors (e.g. altitude, tree cover) could describe spatial patterns in Tw in other rivers better than those including air temperature. Such findings are critical for developing Tw models that have management application.
Himanshu Arora, Chandra Shekhar Prasad Ojha, Wouter Buytaert, Gujjunadu Suryaprakash Kaushika, and Chetan Sharma
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-388, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-388, 2017
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
In many agrarian countries (like India), the agricultural practices are usually rainfall dependent. Therefore keeping the water budget into account, precipitation being an important component must be analysed thoroughly for its occurrence and amount. The analysis of trends can provide an insight in understanding the possible impacts in future, which can assist living beings to adapt and cope up with changing climate and hydrological cycle.
Cédric L. R. Laizé, Cristian Bruna Meredith, Michael J. Dunbar, and David M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3231–3247, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3231-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3231-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Stream temperature controls many river processes, making it vital to know how climate affects it. Climate and stream temperatures at 35 British sites and associated basin properties were used to model climate–water temperature associations and to assess how they are influenced by basins. Associations vary with season and water temperature range. Basin permeability, size, and elevation have the main influence; smaller upland or impermeable basins are the most sensitive to climate.
Sally Rangecroft, Anne F. Van Loon, Héctor Maureira, Koen Verbist, and David M. Hannah
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2016-57, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2016-57, 2016
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This paper on anthropogenic droughts looks at the interactions of human activity and "natural" processes. Using a case study of the introduction of a reservoir in a Chilean river basin and a new methodology, we established the most effective way forward for quantifying human activities on hydrological drought: the "threshold level" method with an "undisturbed" time period as the threshold. This will increase our understanding on how human activities are impacting the hydrological system.
Anne F. Van Loon, Kerstin Stahl, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Julian Clark, Sally Rangecroft, Niko Wanders, Tom Gleeson, Albert I. J. M. Van Dijk, Lena M. Tallaksen, Jamie Hannaford, Remko Uijlenhoet, Adriaan J. Teuling, David M. Hannah, Justin Sheffield, Mark Svoboda, Boud Verbeiren, Thorsten Wagener, and Henny A. J. Van Lanen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3631–3650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In the Anthropocene, drought cannot be viewed as a natural hazard independent of people. Drought can be alleviated or made worse by human activities and drought impacts are dependent on a myriad of factors. In this paper, we identify research gaps and suggest a framework that will allow us to adequately analyse and manage drought in the Anthropocene. We need to focus on attribution of drought to different drivers, linking drought to its impacts, and feedbacks between drought and society.
Jimmy O'Keeffe, Wouter Buytaert, Ana Mijic, Nicholas Brozović, and Rajiv Sinha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1911–1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1911-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1911-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Semi-structured interviews provide an effective and efficient way of collecting qualitative and quantitative data on water use practices. Interviews are organised around a topic guide, which helps lead the conversation while allowing sufficient opportunity to identify issues previously unknown to the researcher. The use of semi-structured interviews could significantly and quickly improve insight on water resources, leading to more realistic future management options and increased water security.
Susana Almeida, Nataliya Le Vine, Neil McIntyre, Thorsten Wagener, and Wouter Buytaert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 887–901, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-887-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-887-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The absence of flow data to calibrate hydrologic models may reduce the ability of such models to reliably inform water resources management. To address this limitation, it is common to condition hydrological model parameters on regionalized signatures. In this study, we justify the inclusion of larger sets of signatures in the regionalization procedure if their error correlations are formally accounted for and thus enable a more complete use of all available information.
P. Blair and W. Buytaert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 443–478, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-443-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-443-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reviews literature surrounding many aspects of socio-hydrological modelling; this includes a background to the subject of socio-hydrology, reasons why socio-hydrological modelling would be used, what is to be modelled in socio-hydrology and concepts that underpin this, as well as several modelling techniques and how they may be applied in socio-hydrology.
S. Moulds, W. Buytaert, and A. Mijic
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3215–3229, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3215-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3215-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The contribution of lulcc is to provide a free and open-source framework for land use change modelling. The software, which is provided as an R package, addresses problems associated with the current paradigm of closed-source, specialised land use change modelling software which disrupt the scientific process. It is an attempt to move the discipline towards open and transparent science and to ensure land use change models are accessible to scientists working across the geosciences.
I. Giuntoli, J.-P. Vidal, C. Prudhomme, and D. M. Hannah
Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-267-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-267-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We assessed future changes in high and low flows globally using runoff projections from global hydrological models (GHMs) driven by global climate models (GCMs) under the RCP8.5 scenario. Further, we quantified the relative size of uncertainty from GHMs and from GCMs using ANOVA. We show that GCMs are the major contributors to uncertainty overall, but GHMs increase their contribution for low flows and can equal or outweigh GCM uncertainty in snow-dominated areas for both high and low flows.
G. Garner, I. A. Malcolm, J. P. Sadler, and D. M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5361–5376, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5361-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5361-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates the processes by which instantaneous longitudinal water temperature gradients may be generated in a stream reach that transitions from moorland to semi-natural forest in the absence of substantial groundwater inflows. Water did not cool as it flowed downstream. Instead, temperature gradients were generated by a combination of reduced rates of heating in the forested reach and advection of cooler (overnight and early morning) water from the upstream moorland catchment.
G. M. Tsarouchi, W. Buytaert, and A. Mijic
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4223–4238, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4223-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4223-2014, 2014
H. M. Holländer, H. Bormann, T. Blume, W. Buytaert, G. B. Chirico, J.-F. Exbrayat, D. Gustafsson, H. Hölzel, T. Krauße, P. Kraft, S. Stoll, G. Blöschl, and H. Flühler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2065–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2065-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2065-2014, 2014
Z. Zulkafli, W. Buytaert, C. Onof, W. Lavado, and J. L. Guyot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1113–1132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1113-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1113-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Comparison of published palaeoclimate records suitable for reconstructing annual to sub-decadal hydroclimatic variability in eastern Australia: implications for water resource management and planning
Unraveling intractable water conflicts: the entanglement of science and politics in decision-making on large hydraulic infrastructure
A Water-Energy-Food Nexus approach for conducting trade-off analysis: Morocco's phosphate industry in the Khouribga region
Quantifying the Impacts of Compound Extremes on Agriculture and Irrigation Water Demand
A watershed classification approach that looks beyond hydrology: application to a semi-arid, agricultural region in Canada
Role-play simulations as an aid to achieve complex learning outcomes in hydrological science
Using a coupled agent-based modeling approach to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions
Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging
Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience
Challenges to implementing bottom-up flood risk decision analysis frameworks: how strong are social networks of flooding professionals?
Socio-hydrological spaces in the Jamuna River floodplain in Bangladesh
An improved method for calculating the regional crop water footprint based on a hydrological process analysis
How downstream sub-basins depend on upstream inflows to avoid scarcity: typology and global analysis of transboundary rivers
An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: case study research
Socio-hydrological perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and groundwater in Cangzhou, North China Plain
Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research
Geoscience on television: a review of science communication literature in the context of geosciences
A "mental models" approach to the communication of subsurface hydrology and hazards
Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity
Socio-hydrological water balance for water allocation between human and environmental purposes in catchments
Long-term monitoring of nitrate transport to drainage from three agricultural clayey till fields
Complex network theory, streamflow, and hydrometric monitoring system design
Hydrological drought types in cold climates: quantitative analysis of causing factors and qualitative survey of impacts
Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities
Assessing blue and green water utilisation in wheat production of China from the perspectives of water footprint and total water use
A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods
Quantifying the human impact on water resources: a critical review of the water footprint concept
Endogenous change: on cooperation and water availability in two ancient societies
Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin
Relationships between environmental governance and water quality in a growing metropolitan area of the Pacific Northwest, USA
A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step – human agency, hydrological processes and time in socio-hydrology
Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji–Tire model
Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world
Evolving water science in the Anthropocene
Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
Reconstructing the duty of water: a study of emergent norms in socio-hydrology
Water consumption from hydropower plants – review of published estimates and an assessment of the concept
Water Accounting Plus (WA+) – a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements
Cyanobacterial and microcystins dynamics following the application of hydrogen peroxide to waste stabilisation ponds
A regional and multi-faceted approach to postgraduate water education – the WaterNet experience in Southern Africa
Reframing hydrology education to solve coupled human and environmental problems
Experiences from online and classroom education in hydroinformatics
Enhancing capacities of riparian professionals to address and resolve transboundary issues in international river basins: experiences from the Lower Mekong River Basin
Assessing ecological land use and water demand of river systems: a case study in Luanhe River, North China
Irrigania – a web-based game about sharing water resources
Competence formation and post-graduate education in the public water sector in Indonesia
A climate-flood link for the lower Mekong River
Experiences of using mobile technologies and virtual field tours in Physical Geography: implications for hydrology education
The Indus basin in the framework of current and future water resources management
Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest Region of North America
Anna L. Flack, Anthony S. Kiem, Tessa R. Vance, Carly R. Tozer, and Jason L. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5699–5712, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Palaeoclimate information was analysed for eastern Australia to determine when (and where) there was agreement about the timing of wet and dry epochs in the pre-instrumental period (1000–1899). The results show that instrumental records (~1900–present) underestimate the full range of rainfall variability that has occurred. When coupled with projected impacts of climate change and growing demands, these results highlight major challenges for water resource management and infrastructure.
Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Nora Van Cauwenbergh, and Pieter van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4903–4921, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our research studies whether science depoliticizes water conflicts or instead conflicts politicize science–policy processes. We analyze a water conflict due to the development of large infrastructure. We interviewed key actors in the conflict and replicated the results of water resources models developed to solve the conflict. We found that knowledge produced in isolation has no positive effect in transforming the conflict; instead, its potential could be enhanced if produced collaboratively.
Sang-Hyun Lee, Amjad T. Assi, Bassel Daher, Fatima E. Mengoub, and Rabi H. Mohtar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4727–4741, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Proper water availability for the right place and time in a changing climate requires analysis of complex scientific, technical, socioeconomic, regulatory, and political issues. A Water-Energy-Food Nexus Phosphate (WEF-P) Tool, based on integrating supply chain processes, transportation, and water–energy footprints could assess the various scenarios to offer an effective means of ensuring sustainable management of limited resources to both agricultural areas and the phosphate industry.
Iman Haqiqi, Danielle S. Grogan, Thomas W. Hertel, and Wolfram Schlenker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-275, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-275, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We combine a high-resolution weather product with fine-scale outputs of a hydrological model to construct functional indicators of compound hydroclimatic extremes for agriculture. We confirm that “wet heat” is more damaging than “dry heat” for crops. We show the average damage from heat stress has been up to four times more severe when combined with water stress. The results are important for research on climate change, irrigation water demand, and subsurface drainage.
Jared D. Wolfe, Kevin R. Shook, Chris Spence, and Colin J. Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3945–3967, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Watershed classification can identify regions expected to respond similarly to disturbance. Methods should extend beyond hydrology to include other environmental questions, such as ecology and water quality. We developed a classification for the Canadian Prairie and identified seven classes defined by watershed characteristics, including elevation, climate, wetland density, and surficial geology. Results provide a basis for evaluating watershed response to land management and climate condition.
Arvid Bring and Steve W. Lyon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2369–2378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrology education strives to teach students both quantitative ability and complex professional skills. Our research shows that role-play simulations are useful to make students able to integrate various analytical skills in complicated settings while not interfering with traditional teaching that fosters their ability to solve mathematical problems. Despite this there are several potential challenging areas in using role-plays, and we therefore suggest ways around these potential roadblocks.
Jin-Young Hyun, Shih-Yu Huang, Yi-Chen Ethan Yang, Vincent Tidwell, and Jordan Macknick
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2261–2278, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study applies a two-way coupled agent-based model (ABM) with a river-reservoir management model (RiverWare) to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions using the Bayesian inference mapping joined with the cost–loss model. The calibration results capture the dynamics of historical irrigated area and streamflow changes and suggest that the proposed framework improves the representation of human decision-making processes compared to conventional rule-based ABMs.
Henning Lebrenz and András Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1633–1648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Many variables, e.g., in hydrology, geology, and social sciences, are only observed at a few distinct measurement locations, and their actual distribution in the entire space remains unknown. We introduce the new geostatistical interpolation method of
quantile kriging, providing an improved estimator and associated uncertainty. It can also host variables, which would not fulfill the implicit presumptions of the traditional geostatistical interpolation methods.
Gemma J. Venhuizen, Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Cathelijne R. Stoof, and Ionica Smeets
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Do experts attach the same meaning as laypeople to terms often used in hydrology such as "river", "flooding" and "downstream"? In this study a survey was completed by 34 experts and 119 laypeople to answer this question. We found that there are some profound differences between experts and laypeople: words like "river" and "river basin" turn out to have a different interpretation between the two groups. However, when using pictures there is much more agreement between the groups.
James O. Knighton, Osamu Tsuda, Rebecca Elliott, and M. Todd Walter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5657–5673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Decision-making for flood risk management is often the collective effort of professionals within government, NGOs, private practice, and advocacy groups. Our research investigates differences among flood experts within Tompkins County, New York (USA). We explore how they differ in their perceptions of flooding risk, desired project outcomes, and knowledge. We observe substantial differences among experts, and recommend formally acknowledging these perceptions when engaging in flood management.
Md Ruknul Ferdous, Anna Wesselink, Luigia Brandimarte, Kymo Slager, Margreet Zwarteveen, and Giuliano Di Baldassarre
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5159–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Socio-hydrological space (SHS) is a concept that enriches the study of socio-hydrology because it helps understand the detailed human–water interactions in a specific location. The concept suggests that the interactions between society and water are place-bound because of differences in social processes and river dynamics. This would be useful for developing interventions under disaster management, but also other development goals. SHS provides a new way of looking at socio-hydrological systems.
Xiao-Bo Luan, Ya-Li Yin, Pu-Te Wu, Shi-Kun Sun, Yu-Bao Wang, Xue-Rui Gao, and Jing Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5111–5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
At present, the water footprint calculated by the quantitative method of crop production water footprint is only a field-scale water footprint, which does not contain all the water consumption of the crop growth process, so its calculated crop production water footprint is incomplete. In this study, the hydrological model SWAT was used to analyze the real water consumption in the course of crop growth, so that the actual water consumption of the crops could be more accurately reflected.
Hafsa Ahmed Munia, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Naho Mirumachi, Yoshihide Wada, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2795–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
An analytical framework is developed drawing on ideas of regime shifts from resilience literature to understand the transition between cases where water scarcity is or is not experienced depending on whether water from upstream is or is not available. The analysis shows 386 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible stress and 306 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible shortage. This provides insights into implications for negotiations between sub-basins.
Erik Mostert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 317–329, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper argues for an alternative approach for socio‒hydrology: detailed case study research. Detailed case study research can increase understanding of how society interacts with hydrology, offers more levers for management than coupled modelling, and facilitates interdisciplinary cooperation. The paper presents a case study of the Dommel Basin in the Netherlands and Belgium and compares this with a published model of the Kissimmee Basin in Florida.
Songjun Han, Fuqiang Tian, Ye Liu, and Xianhui Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3619–3633, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The history of the co-evolution of the coupled human–groundwater system in Cangzhou (a region with the most serious depression cone in the North China Plain) is analyzed with a particular focus on how the groundwater crisis unfolded and how people attempted to settle the crisis. The evolution of the system was substantially impacted by two droughts. Further restoration of groundwater environment could be anticipated, but the occurrence of drought still remains an undetermined external forcing.
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana and Maurits Willem Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.
Rolf Hut, Anne M. Land-Zandstra, Ionica Smeets, and Cathelijne R. Stoof
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2507–2518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
To help geo-scientists prepare for TV appearances, we review the scientific literature on effective science communication related to TV. We identify six main themes: scientist motivation, target audience, narratives and storytelling, jargon and information transfer, relationship between scientists and journalists, and stereotypes of scientists on TV. We provide a detailed case study as illustration for each theme.
Hazel Gibson, Iain S. Stewart, Sabine Pahl, and Alison Stokes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1737–1749, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides empirical evidence for the value of using a psychology-based approach to communication of hydrology and hazards. It demonstrates the use of the "mental models" approach to risk assessment used in a regional geoscience context to explore the conceptions of the geological subsurface between experts and non-experts, and how that impacts on communication.
J. F. Schyns, A. Y. Hoekstra, and M. J. Booij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4581–4608, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The paper draws attention to the fact that green water (soil moisture returning to the atmosphere through evaporation) is a scarce resource, because its availability is limited and there are competing demands for green water. Around 80 indicators of green water availability and scarcity are reviewed and classified based on their scope and purpose of measurement. This is useful in order to properly include limitations in green water availability in water scarcity assessments.
S. Zhou, Y. Huang, Y. Wei, and G. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3715–3726, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, 2015
V. Ernstsen, P. Olsen, and A. E. Rosenbom
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3475–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, 2015
M. J. Halverson and S. W. Fleming
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3301–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, 2015
A. F. Van Loon, S. W. Ploum, J. Parajka, A. K. Fleig, E. Garnier, G. Laaha, and H. A. J. Van Lanen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1993–2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological drought types in cold climates have complex causing factors and impacts. In Austria and Norway, a lack of snowmelt is mainly related to below-normal winter precipitation, and a lack of glaciermelt is mainly related to below-normal summer temperature. These and other hydrological drought types impacted hydropower production, water supply, and agriculture in Europe and the US in the recent and far past. For selected drought events in Norway impacts could be coupled to causing factors.
A. Fernald, S. Guldan, K. Boykin, A. Cibils, M. Gonzales, B. Hurd, S. Lopez, C. Ochoa, M. Ortiz, J. Rivera, S. Rodriguez, and C. Steele
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 293–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, 2015
X. C. Cao, P. T. Wu, Y. B. Wang, and X. N. Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3165–3178, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, 2014
K. Madani, M. Zarezadeh, and S. Morid
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3055–3068, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, 2014
J. Chenoweth, M. Hadjikakou, and C. Zoumides
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2325–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, 2014
S. Pande and M. Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1745–1760, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, 2014
P. Gober and H. S. Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1413–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, 2014
H. Chang, P. Thiers, N. R. Netusil, J. A. Yeakley, G. Rollwagen-Bollens, S. M. Bollens, and S. Singh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1383–1395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, 2014
M. W. Ertsen, J. T. Murphy, L. E. Purdue, and T. Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1369–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, 2014
Y. Liu, F. Tian, H. Hu, and M. Sivapalan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289–1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, 2014
S. N. Lane
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014
H. H. G. Savenije, A. Y. Hoekstra, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 319–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, 2014
A. Wutich, A. C. White, D. D. White, K. L. Larson, A. Brewis, and C. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 109–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, 2014
J. L. Jr. Wescoat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4759–4768, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, 2013
T. H. Bakken, Å. Killingtveit, K. Engeland, K. Alfredsen, and A. Harby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3983–4000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, 2013
P. Karimi, W. G. M. Bastiaanssen, and D. Molden
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2459–2472, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2459-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2459-2013, 2013
D. J. Barrington, A. Ghadouani, and G. N. Ivey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2097–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2097-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2097-2013, 2013
L. Jonker, P. van der Zaag, B. Gumbo, J. Rockström, D. Love, and H. H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4225–4232, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4225-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4225-2012, 2012
E. G. King, F. C. O'Donnell, and K. K. Caylor
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4023–4031, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012, 2012
I. Popescu, A. Jonoski, and B. Bhattacharya
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3935–3944, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3935-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3935-2012, 2012
W. Douven, M. L. Mul, B. Fernández-Álvarez, S. Lam Hung, N. Bakker, G. Radosevich, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3183–3197, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3183-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3183-2012, 2012
D. H. Yan, G. Wang, H. Wang, and T. L. Qin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2469–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012, 2012
J. Seibert and M. J. P. Vis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2523–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2523-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2523-2012, 2012
J. M. Kaspersma, G. J. Alaerts, and J. H. Slinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2379–2392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2379-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2379-2012, 2012
J. M. Delgado, B. Merz, and H. Apel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1533–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1533-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1533-2012, 2012
D. G. Kingston, W. J. Eastwood, P. I. Jones, R. Johnson, S. Marshall, and D. M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1281–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012, 2012
A. N. Laghari, D. Vanham, and W. Rauch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1063–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1063-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1063-2012, 2012
A. F. Hamlet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011, 2011
Cited articles
Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., and Rockström, J.: Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters, Science, 309, 1036–1039, 2005.
Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. J. W., Emanuel, K., Lin, N., and De Moel, H.: Evaluating Flood Resilience Strategies for Coastal Megacities, Science, 344, 1–3, 2014.
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E.: A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective, Ecol. Soc., 9, 1–18, 2004.
Andersson, K. P. and Ostrom, E.: Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective, Policy Sci., 41, 71–93, 2008.
Arnall, A.: Resilience as transformative capacity: Exploring the quadripartite cycle of structuration in a Mozambican resettlement programme, Geoforum, 66, 26–36, 2015.
Backlund, A.: The definition of system, Kybernetes, 29, 444–451, 2000.
Barange, M., Merino, G., Blanchard, J. L., Scholtens, J., Harle, J., Allison, E. H., Allen, J. I., Holt, J., and Jennings, S.: Impacts of climate change on marine ecosystem production in societies dependent on fisheries, Nature Climate Change, 4, 211–216, 2014.
Barrett, C. B. and Constas, M. A.: Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 14625–14630, 2014.
Béné, C., Newsham, A., Davies, M., Ulrichs, M., and Godfrey-Wood, R.: Review article: Resilience, poverty and development, J. Int. Dev., 26, 598–623, 2014.
Bennett, N. J., Dearden, P., Murray, G., and Kadfak, A.: The capacity to adapt?: Communities in a changing climate, environment, and economy on the northern Andaman coast of Thailand, Ecol. Soc., 19, 5, 2014.
Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., and Brock, W. A.: Turning back from the brink: detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 826–831, 2009.
Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E. L., BurnSilver, S., Cundill, G., Dakos, V., Daw, T. M., Evans, L. S., Kotschy, K., Leitch, A. M., Meek, C., Quinlan, A., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Robards, M. D., Schoon, M. L., Schultz, L., and West, P. C.: Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 37, 421–448, 2012.
Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., and Schoon, M. L. (Eds.): Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.
Bisson, P. A., Dunham, J. B., and Reeves, G. H.: Freshwater ecosystems and resilience of Pacific salmon: habitat management based on natural variability, Ecol. Soc., 14, 45, 2009.
Botter, G., Basso, S., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Rinaldo, A.: Resilience of river flow regimes, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 12925–12930, 2013.
Brand, F. S. and Jax, K.: Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience?: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object, Ecol. Soc., 12, 23, 2007.
Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., and Mooney, H. A.: The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32, 67–98, 2007.
Bunn, S. E., Abal, E. G., Smith, M. J., Choy, S. C., Fellows, C. S., Harch, B. D., Kennard, M. J., and Sheldon, F.: Integration of science and monitoring of river ecosystem health to guide investments in catchment protection and rehabilitation, Freshwater Biol., 55, 223–240, 2010.
Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Grainger, S., Acosta, L., Alemie, T. C., Bastiaensen, J., De Bièvre, B., Bhusal, J., Clark, J., Dewulf, A., Foggin, M., Hannah, D. M., Hergarten, C., Isaeva, A., Karpouzoglou, T., Pandeya, B., Paudel, D., Sharma, K., Steenhuis, T., Tilahun, S., Van Hecken, G., and Zhumanova, M.: Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development, Front. Earth Sci., 2, 1–21, 2014.
Buytaert, W., Dewulf, A., De Bièvre, B., Clark, J., and Hannah, D. M.: Citizen Science for Water Resources Management: Toward Polycentric Monitoring and Governance?, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., 142, 1816002, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000641, 2016.
Carey, M., Baraer, M., Mark, B. G., French, A., Bury, J., Young, K. R., and McKenzie, J. M.: Toward hydro-social modeling: Merging human variables and the social sciences with climate-glacier runoff models (Santa River, Peru), J. Hydrol., 518, 60–70, 2014.
Carpenter, K. E., Abrar, M., Aeby, G., Aronson, R. B., Banks, S., Bruckner, A., Chiriboga, A., Cortes, J., Delbeek, J. C., DeVantier, L., Edgar, G. J., Edwards, A. J., Fenner, D., Guzman, H. M., Hoeksema, B. W., Hodgson, G., Johan, O., Licuanan, W. Y., Livingstone, S. R., Lovell, E. R., Moore, J. A., Obura, D. O., Ochavillo, D., Polidoro, B. A., Precht, W. F., Quibilan, M. C., Reboton, C., Richards, Z. T., Rogers, A. D., Sanciangco, J., Sheppard, A., Sheppard, C., Smith, J., Stuart, S., Turak, E., Veron, J. E. N., Wallace, C., Weil, E., and Wood, E.: One-Third of Reef-Building Corals Face Elevated Extinction Risk from Climate Change and Local Impacts, Science, 321, 560–563, 2008.
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., and Abel, N.: From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what?, Ecosystems, 4, 765–781, 2001.
Chen, X., Wang, D., Tian, F., and Sivapalan, M.: From channelization to restoration: Sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida, Water Resour. Res., 51, 1–18, 2016.
Collins, M., An, S.-I., Cai, W., Ganachaud, A., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F.-F., Jochum, M., Lengaigne, M., Power, S., Timmermann, A., Vecchi, G., and Wittenberg, A.: The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Nino, Nat. Geosci., 3, 391–397, 2010.
Cote, M. and Nightingale, A. J.: Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 36, 475–489, 2012.
Crane, T. A.: Of models and meanings: Cultural resilience in social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 15, 19, 2010.
Cumming, G. S., Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., Binford, M., Holt, R. D., Stickler, C., and Van Holt, T.: An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience, Ecosystems, 8, 975–987, 2005.
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., and Webb, J.: A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters, Global Environ. Chang., 18, 598–606, 2008.
Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., and Emrich, C. T.: Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions, J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag., 7, 1–22, 2010.
Czucz, B., Csecserits, A., Botta-Dukat, Z., Kroel-Dulay, G., Szabo, R., Horvath, F., and Molnar, Z.: An indicator framework for the climatic adaptive capacity of natural ecosystems, J. Veg. Sci., 22, 711–725, 2011.
Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., and Shallenberger, R.: Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 21–28, 2009.
da Silveira, A. R. and Richards, K. S.: The Link Between Polycentrism and Adaptive Capacity in River Basin Governance Systems: Insights from the River Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) Basin, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 103, 319–329, 2013.
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., and Porter, L.: Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? “Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice Interacting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planni, Plan. Theory Pract., 13, 299–333, 2012.
Dawson, T. P., Jackson, S. T., House, J. I., Prentice, I. C., and Mace, G. M.: Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate, Science, 332, 53–58, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303, 2011.
de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., and Boumans, R. M. J.: A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecol. Econ., 41, 393–408, 2002.
Dent, C. L., Cumming, G. S., and Carpenter, S. R.: Multiple states in river and lake ecosystems, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lon. B, 357, 635–645, 2002.
Doney, S. C., Ruckelshaus, M., Duffy, J. E., Barry, J. P., Chan, F., English, C. A., Galindo, H. M., Grebmeier, J. M., Hollowed, A. B., Knowlton, N., Polovina, J., Rabalais, N. N., Sydeman, W. J., and Talley, L. D.: Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 4, 11–37, 2012.
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z. I., Knowler, D. J., Leveque, C., Naiman, R. J., Prieur-Richard, A. H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L. J., and Sullivan, C. A.: Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges, Biol. Rev., 81, 163–182, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950, 2006.
Dufour, S. and Piégay, H.: From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits, River Res. Appl., 25, 568–581, 2009.
Elshafei, Y., Sivapalan, M., Tonts, M., and Hipsey, M. R.: A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2141–2166, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014, 2014.
Endfield, G. H.: The resilience and adaptive capacity of social-environmental systems in colonial Mexico, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 3676–3681, 2012.
Engel, S. and Schaefer, M.: Ecosystem services-a useful concept for addressing water challenges?, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 696–707, 2013.
Engle, N. L.: Adaptive capacity and its assessment, Global Environ. Chang., 21, 647–656, 2011.
Environment Agency: A National Assessment of Flood Risk, Flooding Engl., 36, 2009.
Ernstson, H., Van Der Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., and Elmqvist, T.: Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems, Ambio, 39, 531–545, 2010.
Evans, B. and Reid, J.: Dangerously exposed: the life and death of the resilient subject, Resilience, 1, 83–98, 2013.
Fernald, A., Guldan, S., Boykin, K., Cibils, A., Gonzales, M., Hurd, B., Lopez, S., Ochoa, C., Ortiz, M., Rivera, J., Rodriguez, S., and Steele, C.: Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 293–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, 2015.
Few, R., Brown, K., and Tompkins, E. L.: Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion, Clim. Policy, 7, 46–59, 2007.
Folke, C.: Resilience (Republished), Ecol. Soc., 21, 44, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444, 2016.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J.: Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 30, 441–473, 2005.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., and Rockström, J.: Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability, Ecol. Soc., 15, 62–68, 2010.
Gallopín, G. C.: Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity, Global Environ. Chang., 16, 293–303, 2006.
Gao, J., Barzel, B., and Barabási, A.-L.: Universal resilience patterns in complex networks, Nature, 530, 307–312, 2016.
Garmestani, A. S. and Benson, M. H.: A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 18, 9, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05180-180109, 2013.
Gibbs, M. T.: Resilience: What is it and what does it mean for marine policymakers?, Mar. Policy, 33, 322–331, 2009.
Gillson, L., Dawson, T. P., Jack, S., and McGeoch, M. A.: Accommodating climate change contingencies in conservation strategy, Trends Ecol. Evol., 28, 135–142, 2013.
Gleick, P. H.: Facing Down the Hydro-Crisis, World Policy J., 26, 17–23, 2009.
Gleick, P. H. and MacDonald, G. M.: Roadmap for sustainable water resources in southwestern North America, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21300–21305, 2010.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Reyes-García, V., Olsson, P., and Montes, C.: Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain, Global Environ. Chang., 22, 640–650, 2012.
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., Nooteboom, S., and Bergsma, E.: The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 459–471, 2010.
Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., and ter Maat, J.: Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world, Global Environ. Chang., 23, 485–498, 2013.
Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., and Corfee-Morlot, J.: Future flood losses in major coastal cities, Nature Climate Change, 3, 802–806, 2013.
Harder, P., Pomeroy, J. W., and Westbrook, C. J.: Hydrological resilience of a Canadian Rockies headwaters basin subject to changing climate, extreme weather, and forest management, Hydrol. Process., 29, 3905–3924, 2015.
Hickey, M. B. C. and Doran, B.: A review of the efficiency of buffer strips for the maintenance and enhancement of riparian ecosystems, Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 39, 311–317, 2004.
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and Bruno, J. F.: The Impact of Climate Change on the World's Marine Ecosystems, Science, 328, 1523–1528, 2010.
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., Harvell, C. D., Sale, P. F., Edwards, A. J., Caldeira, K., Knowlton, N., Eakin, C. M., Iglesias-Prieto, R., Muthiga, N., Bradbury, R. H., Dubi, A., and Hatziolos, M. E.: Coral Reefs under Rapic Climate Change and Ocean Acidification, Science, 318, 1737–1742, 2008.
Hoffmann, A. and Sgrò, C.: Climate change and evolutionary adaptation, Nature, 470, 479–485, 2011.
Holling, C. S.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 1–23, 1973.
Josefsson, H. and Baaner, L.: The Water Framework Directive – A Directive for the Twenty-First Century?, J. Environ. Law, 23, 463–486, 2011.
Kandasamy, J., Sounthararajah, D., Sivabalan, P., Chanan, A., Vigneswaran, S., and Sivapalan, M.: Socio-hydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: a case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1027–1041, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1027-2014, 2014.
Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., and Clark, J.: Advancing adaptive governance of social-ecological systems through theoretical multiplicity, Environ. Sci. Policy, 57, 1–9, 2016a.
Karpouzoglou, T., Zulkafli, Z., Grainger, S., Dewulf, A., Buytaert, W., and Hannah, D. M.: Environmental Virtual Observatories (EVOs): prospects for knowledge co-creation and resilience in the Information Age, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 18, 40–48, 2016b.
Keating, K., May, P., Pettit, A., and Pickering, R.: Cost estimation for household flood resitance and resilience measures – summary of evidence, Report – SC080039/R11, 28, 2015.
Keck, M. and Sakdapolrak, P.: What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward, Erdkunde, 67, 5–19, 2013.
Kelman, I., Gaillard, J. C., and Mercer, J.: Climate Change's Role in Disaster Risk Reduction's Future: Beyond Vulnerability and Resilience, Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 6, 21–27, 2015.
Khamis, K., Hannah, D. M., Hill Calvis, M., Brown, L. E., Castella, E., and Milner, A. M.: Alpine aquatic ecosystem conservation policy in a changing climate, Environ. Sci. Policy, 43, 39–55, 2013.
Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. J., and Thomalla, F.: Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?, Environ. Hazards, 5, 35–45, 2003.
Krimbas, C. B.: On fitness, Biol. Philos., 19, 185–203, 2004.
Kumar, P.: Hydrocomplexity: Addressing water security and emergent environmental risks, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5827–5838, 2015.
Kuo, C.-Y., Yuen, Y. S., Meng, P.-J., Ho, P.-H., Wang, J.-T., Liu, P.-J., Chang, Y.-C., Dai, C.-F., Fan, T.-Y., Lin, H.-J., Baird, A. H., and Chen, C. A.: Recurrent Disturbances and the Degradation of Hard Coral Communities in Taiwan, PLoS One, 7, e44364, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044364, 2012.
Langridge, R., Christian-Smith, J., and Lohse, K. A.: Access and resilience: Analyzing the construction of social resilience to the threat of water scarcity, Ecol. Soc., 11, 18, 2006.
Liao, K. H.: A theory on urban resilience to floods – A basis for alternative planning practices, Ecol. Soc., 17, 48, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05231-170448, 2012.
Limburg, K. E., O'Neill, R. V., Costanza, R., and Farber, S.: Complex systems and valuation, Ecol. Econ., 41, 409–420, 2002.
Lindner, M., Maroschek, M., Netherer, S., Kremer, A., Barbati, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Seidl, R., Delzon, S., Corona, P., Kolström, M., Lexer, M. J., and Marchetti, M.: Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems, Forest Ecol. Manage., 259, 698–709, 2010.
Linton, J. and Budds, J.: The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water, Geoforum, 57, 170–180, 2014.
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., and Taylor, W. W.: Complexity of coupled human and natural systems, Science, 317, 1513–1516, 2007.
Lorenz, D. F.: The diversity of resilience: Contributions from a social science perspective, Nat. Hazards, 67, 7–24, 2013.
Mace, G. M.: Whose conservation? Changes in the perception and goals of nature conservation require a solid scientific basis, Science, 245, 1558–1560, 2014.
MacKinnon, D. and Derickson, K. D.: From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 37, 253–270, 2012.
Malhotra, S., Kim, T., Zager, J., Bennett, J., Ebright, M., D'Angelica, M., and Fong, Y.: Use of an oncolytic virus secreting GM-CSF as combined oncolytic and immunotherapy for treatment of colorectal and hepatic adenocarcinomas, Surgery, 141, 520–529, 2007.
Mao, F. and Richards, K.: Irreversible river water quality and the concept of the reference condition, Area, 44, 423–431, 2012.
McGlade, J., McIntosh, B. S., and Jeffrey, P.: Landscape Sensitivity, Resilience and Sustainable Watershed Management, in: Coping with Water Deficiency: From Research to Policymaking With Examples from Southern Europe, the Mediterranean and Developing Countries, edited by: Koundouri, P., 23 pp., Springer Netherlands, 2008.
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., and Stults, M.: Defining urban resilience?: A review, Landsc. Urban Plan., 147, 38–49, 2016.
Methmann, C. and Oels, A.: From “fearing” to “empowering” climate refugees: Governing climate-induced migration in the name of resilience, Secur. Dialogue, 46, 51–68, 2015.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Walker, B., Birkmann, J., van der Leeuw, S., Rockström, J., Hinkel, J., Downing, T., Folke, C., and Nelson, D.: Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts, Ecol. Soc., 15, 11, 2011.
Miller, S. W., Wooster, D., and Li, J.: Resistance and resilience of macroinvertebrates to irrigation water withdrawals, Freshwater Biol., 52, 2494–2510, 2007.
Milman, A. and Short, A.: Incorporating resilience into sustainability indicators: An example for the urban water sector, Global Environ. Chang., 18, 758–767, 2008.
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Di Baldassarre, G., Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C., Thompson, S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and Belyaev, V.: “Panta Rhei – Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society – The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1256–1275, 2013.
National Research Council: Resilience and Ecosystem Services, in: An Ecosystem Services Approach to Assessing the Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico, 246 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/18387, National Academies Press, 2013.
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., and Pfefferbaum, R. L.: Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness, Am. J. Community Psychol., 41, 127–150, 2008.
Olsson, L., Jerneck, A., Thoren, H., Persson, J., and O'Byrne, D.: Why resilience is unappealing to social science: Theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience, Sci. Adv., 1, e1400217, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400217, 2015.
O'Reilly, C. M., Alin, S. R., Plisnier, P.-D. D., Cohen, A. S., and McKee, B. A.: Climate change decreases aquatic ecosystem productivity of Lake Tanganyika, Africa, Nature, 424, 766–768, 2003.
Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Ardalan, A., Paton, D., Jabbari, H., and Khankeh, H. R.: Community Disaster Resilience: a Systematic Review on Assessment Models and Tools, PLoS Curr. Disasters, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed, 2015.
Ostrom, E.: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems, Science, 325, 419–422, 2009.
Ozkan, K., Jeppesen, E., Johansson, L. S., and Beklioglu, M.: The response of periphyton and submerged macrophytes to nitrogen and phosphorus loading in shallow warm lakes: A mesocosm experiment, Freshwater Biol., 55, 463–475, 2010.
Pahl-Wostl, C.: A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes, Global Environ. Chang., 19, 354–365, 2009.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Vorosmarty, C., Bhaduri, A., Bogardi, J., Rockstrom, J., and Alcamo, J.: Towards a sustainable water future: Shaping the next decade of global water research, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 708–714, 2013.
Park, J., Seager, T. P., Rao, P. S. C., Convertino, M., and Linkov, I.: Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems, Risk Anal., 33, 356–367, 2013.
Pearson, R. G.: Reasons to Conserve Nature, Trends Ecol. Evol., 31, 366–371, 2016.
Peterson, T. J., Western, A. W., and Argent, R. M.: Analytical methods for ecosystem resilience: A hydrological investigation, Water Resour. Res., 48, 1–16, 2012.
Plummer, R. and Armitage, D.: A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world, Ecol. Econ., 61, 62–74, 2007.
Robinson, G. M. and Carson, D. A.: Resilient communities: Transitions, pathways and resourcefulness, Geogr. J., 182, https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12144, 2015.
Rockström, J., Falkenmark, M., Folke, C., Lannerstad, M., Barron, J., Enfors, E., Gordon, L., Heinke, J., Hoff, H., and Pahl-Wostl, C.: Water resilience for human prosperity, Water Resil. Hum. Prosper., 1784, 1–292, 2014.
Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M., and Wall, D. H.: Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100, Science, 287, 1770–1774, 2000.
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., and Walker, B.: Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 591–596, 2001.
Scheffer, M., Barrett, S., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Green, A. J., Holmgren, M., Hughes, T. P., Kosten, S., van de Leemput, I. A., Nepstad, D. C., van Nes, E. H., Peeters, E. T. H. M., and Walker, B.: Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems, Science, 347, 1317–1319, 2015.
Sivakumar, B.: Socio-hydrology: Not a new science, but a recycled and re-worded hydrosociology, Hydrol. Process., 26, 3788–3790, 2012.
Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. G., and Blöschl, G.: Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1270–1276, 2012.
Sivapalan, M., Konar, M., and Srinivasan, V.: Socio-hydrology: Use-inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene Earth's Future, Earth's Futur., 2, 225–230, 2014.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J.: Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability, Global Environ. Chang., 16, 282–292, 2006.
Strunz, S.: Is conceptual vagueness an asset? Arguments from philosophy of science applied to the concept of resilience, Ecol. Econ., 76, 112–118, 2012.
Sudmeier-Rieux, K. I.: Resilience – an emerging paradigm of danger or of hope?, Disaster Prev. Manag., 23, 67–80, 2014.
Terrado, M., Acuña, V., Ennaanay, D., Tallis, H., and Sabater, S.: Impact of climate extremes on hydrological ecosystem services in a heavily humanized Mediterranean basin, Ecol. Indic., 37, 199–209, 2014.
Thomas, D. S. G. (Ed.): The Dictionary of Physical Geography, Fourth Edn., Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, 2016.
Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., and Schiller, A.: A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 8074–8079, 2003.
Van Loon, A. F., Stahl, K., Di Baldassarre, G., Clark, J., Rangecroft, S., Wanders, N., Gleeson, T., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Tallaksen, L. M., Hannaford, J., Uijlenhoet, R., Teuling, A. J., Hannah, D. M., Sheffield, J., Svoboda, M., Verbeiren, B., Wagener, T., and Van Lanen, H. A. J.: Drought in a human-modified world: reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3631–3650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016, 2016.
van Vliet, M. T. H., Ludwig, F., and Kabat, P.: Global streamflow and thermal habitats of freshwater fishes under climate change, Climatic Change, 121, 739–754, 2013.
Vigerstol, K. L. and Aukema, J. E.: A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2403–2409, 2011.
Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., and Lammers, R. B.: Global Water Resources: Vulnerability from Climate Change and Population Growth, Science, 289, 284–288, 2000.
Walker, B., Hollin, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kinzig, A., Holling, C., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A.: Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 9, 5, 2004.
Walker, B. H., Abel, N., Anderies, J. M., and Ryan, P.: Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia, Ecol. Soc., 14, 12, 2009.
Walker, B. H., Carpenter, S. R., Rockstrom, J., Crépin, A.-S., and Peterson, G. D.: Drivers, “Slow” Variables, “Fast” Variables, Shocks, and Resilience, Ecol. Soc., 17, 30, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05063-170330, 2012.
Ward, D. R.: Water Wars: Drought, Flood, Folly and the Politics of Thirst, Riverhead Books, New York, 320 pp., 2003.
Weichselgartner, J. and Kelman, I.: Geographies of resilience?: Challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 39, 249–267, 2015.
Wesselink, A., Kooy, M., and Warner, J.: Socio-hydrology and hydrosocial analysis: toward dialogues across disciplines, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1196, November 2016.
West, S., Haider, J., Sinare, H., and Karpouzoglou, T.: Beyond divides: Prospects for synergy between resilience and pathways approaches to sustainability, STEPS Working Paper 65, STEPS Centre, Brighton, 2014.
Willis, K. J., Bailey, R. M., Bhagwat, S. A., and Birks, H. J. B.: Biodiversity baselines, thresholds and resilience: testing predictions and assumptions using palaeoecological data, Trends Ecol. Evol., 25, 583–591, 2010.
Wilson, S., Pearson, L. J., Kashima, Y., Lusher, D., and Pearson, C.: Separating adaptive maintenance (Resilience) and transformative capacity of social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 18, 22, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05100-180122, 2013.
Wyborn, C.: Co-productive governance: A relational framework for adaptive governance, Global Environ. Chang., 30, 56–67, 2015.
Yan, L. and Xu, X.: Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental system from the perspective of hazard, sensitivity, and resilience: A case study of Beijing, China, Environ. Earth Sci., 61, 1179–1186, 2010.
Zedler, J.: Progress in wetland restoration ecology, Trends Ecol. Evol., 15, 402–407, 2000.
Search articles
Download
Short summary
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and analytical assessment of resilience in socio-hydrological contexts. We identify three framings of resilience for different human–water couplings, which have distinct application fields and are used for different water management challenges. To assess and improve socio-hydrological resilience in each type, we introduce a
resilience canvasas a heuristic tool to design bespoke management strategies.
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and...
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.