Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1–22, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1-2017
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1–22, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1-2017
Review article
02 Jan 2017
Review article | 02 Jan 2017

Rain or snow: hydrologic processes, observations, prediction, and research needs

Adrian A. Harpold et al.

Related authors

CAMELS-Chem: Augmenting CAMELS (Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-sample Studies) with Atmospheric and Stream Water Chemistry Data
Gary Sterle, Julia Perdrial, Li Li, Thomas Adler, Kristen Underwood, Donna Rizzo, Hang Wen, and Adrian Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-81,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-81, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Diel streamflow cycles suggest more sensitive snowmelt-driven streamflow to climate change than land surface modeling
Sebastian A. Krogh, Lucia Scaff, Gary Sterle, James Kirchner, Beatrice Gordon, and Adrian Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-437,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-437, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Temperature controls production but hydrology regulates export of dissolved organic carbon at the catchment scale
Hang Wen, Julia Perdrial, Benjamin W. Abbott, Susana Bernal, Rémi Dupas, Sarah E. Godsey, Adrian Harpold, Donna Rizzo, Kristen Underwood, Thomas Adler, Gary Sterle, and Li Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 945–966, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-945-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-945-2020, 2020
Short summary
Now you see it, now you don't: a case study of ephemeral snowpacks and soil moisture response in the Great Basin, USA
Rose Petersky and Adrian Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4891–4906, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4891-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4891-2018, 2018
Short summary
Laser vision: lidar as a transformative tool to advance critical zone science
A. A. Harpold, J. A. Marshall, S. W. Lyon, T. B. Barnhart, B. A. Fisher, M. Donovan, K. M. Brubaker, C. J. Crosby, N. F. Glenn, C. L. Glennie, P. B. Kirchner, N. Lam, K. D. Mankoff, J. L. McCreight, N. P. Molotch, K. N. Musselman, J. Pelletier, T. Russo, H. Sangireddy, Y. Sjöberg, T. Swetnam, and N. West
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2881–2897, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2881-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2881-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Modelling evaporation with local, regional and global BROOK90 frameworks: importance of parameterization and forcing
Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Luong, Rico Kronenberg, Thomas Grünwald, and Christian Bernhofer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3177–3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hydrological concept formation inside long short-term memory (LSTM) networks
Thomas Lees, Steven Reece, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Jens De Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Peter Greve, Louise Slater, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3079–3101, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3079-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3079-2022, 2022
Short summary
A two-step merging strategy for incorporating multi-source precipitation products and gauge observations using machine learning classification and regression over China
Huajin Lei, Hongyu Zhao, and Tianqi Ao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2969–2995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2969-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2969-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hydrometeorological evaluation of two nowcasting systems for Mediterranean heavy precipitation events with operational considerations
Alexane Lovat, Béatrice Vincendon, and Véronique Ducrocq
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2697–2714, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2697-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2697-2022, 2022
Short summary
On the links between sub-seasonal clustering of extreme precipitation and high discharge in Switzerland and Europe
Alexandre Tuel, Bettina Schaefli, Jakob Zscheischler, and Olivia Martius
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2649-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2649-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abatzoglou, J. T.: Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3413, 2013.
Anderson, E.: Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model – Snow-17, available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hrl/nwsrfs/users_manual/part2/_pdf/22snow17.pdf, (last access: 22 August 2016), 2006,
Arkin, P. A. and Ardanuy, P. E.: Estimating climatic-scale precipitation from space: a review, J. Climate, 2, 1229–1238, 1989.
Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan R., Williams, J. R, Haney, E. B., and Neitsch S. L.: SWAT Input/Output Documentation, Texas Water Resources Institute, TR-439, available at: http://swat.tamu.edu/media/69296/SWAT-IO-Documentation-2012.pdf, (last access: 22 August 2016), 2012,
Bales, R. C., Molotch, N. P., Painter, T. H., Dettinger, M. D., Rice, R., and Dozier, J.: Mountain hydrology of the western United States, Water Resour. Res., 42, W08432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004387, 2006.
Download
Short summary
The phase of precipitation as rain or snow is fundamental to hydrological processes and water resources. Despite its importance, the methods used to predict precipitation phase are inconsistent and often overly simplified. We review these methods and underlying mechanisms that control phase. We present a vision to meet important research gaps needed to improve prediction, including new field-based and remote measurements, validating new and existing methods, and expanding regional prediction.