Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1-2017
Review article
 | 
02 Jan 2017
Review article |  | 02 Jan 2017

Rain or snow: hydrologic processes, observations, prediction, and research needs

Adrian A. Harpold, Michael L. Kaplan, P. Zion Klos, Timothy Link, James P. McNamara, Seshadri Rajagopal, Rina Schumer, and Caitriana M. Steele

Related authors

Ensemble-based data assimilation improves hyperresolution snowpack simulations in forests
Esteban Alonso-González, Adrian Harpold, Jessica D. Lundquist, Cara Piske, Laura Sourp, Kristoffer Aalstad, and Simon Gascoin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2347,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2347, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Improving Model Calibrations in a Changing World: Controlling for Nonstationarity After Mega Disturbance Reduces Hydrological Uncertainty
Elijah N. Boardman, Gabrielle F. S. Boisramé, Mark S. Wigmosta, Robert K. Shriver, and Adrian A. Harpold
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1877,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1877, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Wind and Topography Underlie Correlation Between Seasonal Snowpack, Mountain Glaciers, and Late-Summer Streamflow
Elijah N. Boardman, Andrew G. Fountain, Joseph W. Boardman, Thomas H. Painter, Evan W. Burgess, Laura Wilson, and Adrian A. Harpold
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3862,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3862, 2025
Short summary
CAMELS-Chem: augmenting CAMELS (Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-sample Studies) with atmospheric and stream water chemistry data
Gary Sterle, Julia Perdrial, Dustin W. Kincaid, Kristen L. Underwood, Donna M. Rizzo, Ijaz Ul Haq, Li Li, Byung Suk Lee, Thomas Adler, Hang Wen, Helena Middleton, and Adrian A. Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 611–630, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-611-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-611-2024, 2024
Short summary
Diel streamflow cycles suggest more sensitive snowmelt-driven streamflow to climate change than land surface modeling does
Sebastian A. Krogh, Lucia Scaff, James W. Kirchner, Beatrice Gordon, Gary Sterle, and Adrian Harpold
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3393–3417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3393-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3393-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Skilful probabilistic predictions of UK flood risk months ahead using a large-sample machine learning model trained on multimodel ensemble climate forecasts
Simon Moulds, Louise Slater, Louise Arnal, and Andrew W. Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2393–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, 2025
Short summary
Towards a robust hydrologic data assimilation system for hurricane-induced river flow forecasting
Peyman Abbaszadeh, Fatemeh Gholizadeh, Keyhan Gavahi, and Hamid Moradkhani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2407–2427, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2407-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2407-2025, 2025
Short summary
Enhanced evaluation of hourly and daily extreme precipitation in Norway from convection-permitting models at regional and local scales
Kun Xie, Lu Li, Hua Chen, Stephanie Mayer, Andreas Dobler, Chong-Yu Xu, and Ozan Mert Göktürk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2133–2152, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Deep-learning-based sub-seasonal precipitation and streamflow ensemble forecasting over the source region of the Yangtze River
Ningpeng Dong, Haoran Hao, Mingxiang Yang, Jianhui Wei, Shiqin Xu, and Harald Kunstmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2023–2042, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2023-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2023-2025, 2025
Short summary
High-resolution land surface modelling over Africa: the role of uncertain soil properties in combination with forcing temporal resolution
Bamidele Oloruntoba, Stefan Kollet, Carsten Montzka, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1659–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1659-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1659-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abatzoglou, J. T.: Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3413, 2013.
Anderson, E.: Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model – Snow-17, available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hrl/nwsrfs/users_manual/part2/_pdf/22snow17.pdf, (last access: 22 August 2016), 2006,
Arkin, P. A. and Ardanuy, P. E.: Estimating climatic-scale precipitation from space: a review, J. Climate, 2, 1229–1238, 1989.
Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan R., Williams, J. R, Haney, E. B., and Neitsch S. L.: SWAT Input/Output Documentation, Texas Water Resources Institute, TR-439, available at: http://swat.tamu.edu/media/69296/SWAT-IO-Documentation-2012.pdf, (last access: 22 August 2016), 2012,
Bales, R. C., Molotch, N. P., Painter, T. H., Dettinger, M. D., Rice, R., and Dozier, J.: Mountain hydrology of the western United States, Water Resour. Res., 42, W08432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004387, 2006.
Download
Short summary
The phase of precipitation as rain or snow is fundamental to hydrological processes and water resources. Despite its importance, the methods used to predict precipitation phase are inconsistent and often overly simplified. We review these methods and underlying mechanisms that control phase. We present a vision to meet important research gaps needed to improve prediction, including new field-based and remote measurements, validating new and existing methods, and expanding regional prediction.
Share