Articles | Volume 16, issue 7
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2159–2168, 2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Hydrology education in a changing world
Research article 18 Jul 2012
Research article | 18 Jul 2012
Teaching hydrogeology: a review of current practice
T. Gleeson et al.
Related subject area
Subject: Groundwater hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory developmentTechnical note: Disentangling the groundwater response to Earth and atmospheric tides to improve subsurface characterisationFlowing wells: terminology, history and role in the evolution of groundwater scienceAsymmetric impact of groundwater use on groundwater droughtsNew model of reactive transport in a single-well push–pull test with aquitard effect and wellbore storageHESS Opinions: The myth of groundwater sustainability in AsiaGroundwater salinity variation in Upazila Assasuni (southwestern Bangladesh), as steered by surface clay layer thickness, relative elevation and present-day land useChanges in groundwater drought associated with anthropogenic warmingApplication of environmental tracers for investigation of groundwater mean residence time and aquifer recharge in fault-influenced hydraulic drop alluvium aquifersHESS Opinions: Linking Darcy's equation to the linear reservoirEffects of microarrangement of solid particles on PCE migration and its remediation in porous mediaHydrological connectivity from glaciers to rivers in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: roles of suprapermafrost and subpermafrost groundwaterTemporal variations of groundwater tables and implications for submarine groundwater discharge: a 3-decade case study in central JapanConsequences and mitigation of saltwater intrusion induced by short-circuiting during aquifer storage and recovery in a coastal subsurfaceUnderstanding groundwater – students' pre-conceptions and conceptual change by means of a theory-guided multimedia learning programThe referential grain size and effective porosity in the Kozeny–Carman modelApproximate analysis of three-dimensional groundwater flow toward a radial collector well in a finite-extent unconfined aquiferTechnical Note: The use of an interrupted-flow centrifugation method to characterise preferential flow in low permeability mediaShallow groundwater thermal sensitivity to climate change and land cover disturbances: derivation of analytical expressions and implications for stream temperature modelingConfronting the vicinity of the surface water and sea shore in a shallow glaciogenic aquifer in southern FinlandResidence times and mixing of water in river banks: implications for recharge and groundwater–surface water exchangeUsing 14C and 3H to understand groundwater flow and recharge in an aquifer windowHydrogeology of an Alpine rockfall aquifer system and its role in flood attenuation and maintaining baseflowMobilisation or dilution? Nitrate response of karst springs to high rainfall eventsTransferring the concept of minimum energy dissipation from river networks to subsurface flow patternsSpectral induced polarization measurements for predicting the hydraulic conductivity in sandy aquifersTransient analysis of fluctuations of electrical conductivity as tracer in the stream bedTransient flow between aquifers and surface water: analytically derived field-scale hydraulic heads and fluxesInfluence of initial heterogeneities and recharge limitations on the evolution of aperture distributions in carbonate aquifersImpact of climate change on groundwater point discharge: backflooding of karstic springs (Loiret, France)Stream depletion rate with horizontal or slanted wells in confined aquifers near a streamTidal propagation in an oceanic island with sloping beaches
Gabriel C. Rau, Mark O. Cuthbert, R. Ian Acworth, and Philipp Blum
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 6033–6046,Short summary
This work provides an important generalisation of a previously developed method that quantifies subsurface barometric efficiency using the groundwater level response to Earth and atmospheric tides. The new approach additionally allows the quantification of hydraulic conductivity and specific storage. This enables improved and rapid assessment of subsurface processes and properties using standard pressure measurements.
Xiao-Wei Jiang, John Cherry, and Li Wan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 6001–6019,Short summary
The gushing of water from flowing wells is a natural phenomenon of interest to the public. This review demonstrates that this spectacular phenomenon also instigated the science of groundwater and can be considered a root of groundwater hydrology. Observations of flowing wells not only led to the foundation of many principles of traditional groundwater hydrology but also played a vital role in the paradigm shift from aquitard-bound flow to cross-formational flow driven by topography.
Doris E. Wendt, Anne F. Van Loon, John P. Bloomfield, and David M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4853–4868,Short summary
Groundwater use changes the availability of groundwater, especially during droughts. This study investigates the impact of groundwater use on groundwater droughts. A methodological framework is presented that was developed and applied to the UK. We identified an asymmetric impact of groundwater use on droughts, which highlights the relation between short-term and long-term strategies for sustainable groundwater use.
Quanrong Wang, Junxia Wang, Hongbin Zhan, and Wenguang Shi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3983–4000,
Franklin W. Schwartz, Ganming Liu, and Zhongbo Yu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 489–500,Short summary
We are concerned about the sad state of affairs around groundwater in the developing countries of Asia and the obvious implications for sustainability. Groundwater production for irrigated agriculture has led to water-level declines that continue to worsen. Yet in the most populous countries, China, India, Pakistan, and Iran, there are only token efforts towards evidence-based sustainable management. It is unrealistic to expect evidence-based groundwater sustainability to develop any time soon.
Floris Loys Naus, Paul Schot, Koos Groen, Kazi Matin Ahmed, and Jasper Griffioen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1431–1451,Short summary
In this paper, we postulate a possible evolution of the groundwater salinity around a village in southwestern Bangladesh, based on high-density fieldwork. We identified that the thickness of the surface clay layer, the surface elevation and the present-day land use determine whether fresh or saline groundwater has formed. The outcomes show how the large groundwater salinity variation in southwestern Bangladesh can be understood, which is valuable for the water management in the region.
John P. Bloomfield, Benjamin P. Marchant, and Andrew A. McKenzie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1393–1408,Short summary
Groundwater is susceptible to drought due to natural variations in climate; however, to date there is no evidence of a relationship between climate change and groundwater drought. Using two long groundwater level records from the UK, we document increases in frequency, magnitude and intensity and changes in duration of groundwater drought associated with climate warming and infer that, given the extent of shallow groundwater globally, warming may widely effect changes to groundwater droughts.
Bin Ma, Menggui Jin, Xing Liang, and Jing Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 427–446,Short summary
Groundwater supplies the most freshwater for industrial and agricultural production and domestic use in the arid northwest of China. This research uses environmental tracers to enhance one's understanding of groundwater, including aquifer recharge sources and groundwater mean residence times in the alluvium aquifers. The results provide valuable implications for groundwater resources regulation and sustainable development and have practical significance for other arid areas.
Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1911–1916,Short summary
This paper provides the connection between two simple equations describing groundwater flow at different scales: the Darcy equation describes groundwater flow at pore scale, the linear reservoir equation at catchment scale. The connection between the two appears to be very simple. The two parameters of the equations are proportional, depending on the porosity of the subsoil and the resistance for the groundwater to enter the surface drainage network.
Ming Wu, Jianfeng Wu, Jichun Wu, and Bill X. Hu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1001–1015,Short summary
Fractal models of regular triangle arrangement (RTA) and square pitch arrangement (SPA) are developed in this study. Results suggest RTA can cause more groundwater contamination and make remediation more difficult. In contrast, the cleanup of contaminants in aquifers with SPA is easier. This study demonstrates how microscale arrangements control contaminant migration and remediation, which is helpful in designing successful remediation schemes for subsurface contamination.
Rui Ma, Ziyong Sun, Yalu Hu, Qixin Chang, Shuo Wang, Wenle Xing, and Mengyan Ge
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4803–4823,Short summary
The roles of groundwater flow in the hydrological cycle within the alpine area characterized by permafrost or seasonal frost are poorly known. We investigated the role of permafrost in controlling groundwater flow and hydrological connections between glaciers and river. The recharge, flow path and discharge of permafrost groundwater at the study site were explored. Two mechanisms were proposed to explain the significantly seasonal variation in interaction between groundwater and surface water.
Bing Zhang, Jing Zhang, and Takafumi Yoshida
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3417–3425,Short summary
Since groundwater is the linkage between climate changes and fresh submarine groundwater discharge, the variations of and relationships among monthly groundwater table, rainfall, snowfall, and climate change events from 1985 to 2015 were analyzed by wavelet coherence to discuss the implications for climate changes. The results show the increase in precipitation and the groundwater table, indicating that fresh submarine groundwater discharge flux may increase under climate change.
Koen Gerardus Zuurbier and Pieter Jan Stuyfzand
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1173–1188,Short summary
The subsurface is increasingly perforated for exploitation of water and energy. This has increased the risk of leakage between originally separated aquifers. It is shown how this leakage can have a very negative impact on the recovery of freshwater during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in brackish-saline aquifers. Deep interception of intruding brackish-saline water can mitigate the negative effects and buoyancy of freshwater to some extent, but not completely.
Ulrike Unterbruner, Sylke Hilberg, and Iris Schiffl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2251–2266,Short summary
Studies show that young people have difficulties with correctly understanding groundwater. We designed a multimedia learning program about groundwater and tested its learning efficacy with pupils and teacher-training students. A novelty is the theory-guided designing of the program on the basis of hydrogeology and science education. The pupils and students greatly benefited from working through the multimedia learning program.
Kosta Urumović and Kosta Urumović Sr.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1669–1680,Short summary
Calculation of hydraulic conductivity of porous materials is crucial for further use in hydrogeological modeling. The Kozeny–Carman model is theoretically impeccable but has not been properly used in recent scientific and expert literature. In this paper, proper use of the Kozeny-Carman formula is given through presentation of geometric mean grain size in the drilled-core sample as the referential mean grain size. Also, procedures for identification of real effective porosity of porous media are presented.
C.-S. Huang, J.-J. Chen, and H.-D. Yeh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 55–71,Short summary
Existing solutions for the problem of pumping at a radial collector well (RCW) in unconfined aquifers either require laborious calculation or predict divergent results at a middle period of pumping. This study relaxes the above two limitations to develop a new analytical solution for the problem. The application of the solution is convenient for those who are not familiar with numerical methods. New findings regarding the responses of flow to pumping at RCW are addressed.
R. A. Crane, M. O. Cuthbert, and W. Timms
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3991–4000,Short summary
We present an interrupted-flow centrifugation technique to characterise the vertical hydraulic properties of dual porosity, low permeability media. Use of large core samples (100mm diameter) enables hydraulic-conductivity-scale issues in dual porosity media to be overcome. Elevated centrifugal force also enables simulating in situ total stress conditions. The methodology is an important tool to assess the ability of dual porosity aquitards to protect underlying aquifer systems.
B. L. Kurylyk, K. T. B. MacQuarrie, D. Caissie, and J. M. McKenzie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2469–2489,Short summary
Changes in climate and land cover are known to warm streams by altering surface heat fluxes. However, the influence of these disturbances on shallow groundwater temperature are not as well understood. In small streams, groundwater discharge may also exert a control on stream temperature, and thus groundwater warming may eventually produce additional stream warming not considered in most existing models. This study investigates these processes and suggests stream temperature model improvements.
S. Luoma, J. Okkonen, K. Korkka-Niemi, N. Hendriksson, and B. Backman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1353–1370,
N. P. Unland, I. Cartwright, D. I. Cendón, and R. Chisari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5109–5124,Short summary
Periodic flooding of rivers should result in increased groundwater recharge near rivers and thus - younger and fresher groundwater near rivers. This study found the age and salinity of shallow groundwater to increase with proximity to the Tambo River in South East Australia. This appears to be due to the upwelling of older, regional groundwater closer the river. Other chemical parameters are consistent with this. This is a process that may be occurring in other similar river systems.
A. P. Atkinson, I. Cartwright, B. S. Gilfedder, D. I. Cendón, N. P. Unland, and H. Hofmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4951–4964,Short summary
This research article uses of radiogenic isotopes, stable isotopes and groundwater geochemistry to study groundwater age and recharge processes in the Gellibrand Valley, a relatively unstudied catchment and potential groundwater resource. The valley is found to contain both "old", regionally recharged groundwater (300-10,000 years) in the near-river environment, and modern groundwater (0-100 years old) further back on the floodplain. There is no recharge of the groundwater by high river flows.
U. Lauber, P. Kotyla, D. Morche, and N. Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4437–4452,
M. Huebsch, O. Fenton, B. Horan, D. Hennessy, K. G. Richards, P. Jordan, N. Goldscheider, C. Butscher, and P. Blum
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4423–4435,
S. Hergarten, G. Winkler, and S. Birk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4277–4288,
M. Attwa and T. Günther
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4079–4094,
C. Schmidt, A. Musolff, N. Trauth, M. Vieweg, and J. H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3689–3697,
G. H. de Rooij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 649–669,
B. Hubinger and S. Birk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3715–3729,
E. Joigneaux, P. Albéric, H. Pauwels, C. Pagé, L. Terray, and A. Bruand
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2459–2470,
P.-R. Tsou, Z.-Y. Feng, H.-D. Yeh, and C.-S. Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1477–1485,
Y.-C. Chang, D.-S. Jeng, and H.-D. Yeh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1341–1351,
Alley, W. M., Healy, R. W., LaBaugh, J. W., and Reilly, T. E.: Flow and storage in groundwater systems, Science, 296, 1985–1990, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067123, 2002.
Bahr, J: O brave new world: geoscientists in an emerging green economy, GSA Today, 20, 12–14, 2009.
Banks, D., Younger, P. L., Arnesen, R.-T., Iversen, E. R., and Banks, S. B.: Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly, Environ. Geol., 32, 157–174, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050204, 1997.
Blanchard, F. N.: An electric analog model demonstrates ground-water flow, J. Geol. Educ., 12, 104–105, 1964.
Brice, J. C. and Levin, H. L.: Porosity and permeability experiments for general geology labratory, J. Geol. Educ., 10, 81–90, 1962.
Coontz, R.: Hydrogeologists tap into demand for an irreplaceable resource, Science, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.a0800120, 2008.
Davis, S. N. and DeWiest, R. J. M.: Hydrogeology, Wiley, New York, 1966.
Day-Lewis, F. D., Gray, M. B., Garfield, R. L., and Day-Lewis, A. D.: An on-campus well field for hydrogeophysics education and undergraduate research, Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 480–486, 2006.
Domenico, P. A. and Schwartz, F. W.: Physical and chemical hydrogeology, Wiley, New York, 1998.
Dunnivant, F. M., Danowski, D., and Newman, M.: Teaching pollutant fate and transport concepts to undergraduate non-science majors, environmental scientists, and hydrogeologists using Enviroland, Journal of Geoscience Education, 50, 553–558, 2002.
Fetter, C. W.: Applied hydrogeology Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
Fletcher, F. W.: A hydrologic field laboratory for undergraduate instruction and research, J. Geol. Educ., 42, 491–493, 1994.
Foster, S. S. D. and Chilton, P. J.: Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 358, 1957–1972, 2003.
Freeze, R. A. and Cherry, J. A.: Groundwater Prentice-Hall Inc., Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.
Fryar, A. E., Thompson, K. E., Hendricks, S. P. and White, D. S.: Incorporating a Watershed-Based Summary Field Exercise into an Introductory Hydrogeology Course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 214–220, 2010.
Giordano, M.: Global groundwater? Issues and solutions, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 34, 153–178, 2009.
Gleeson, T., VanderSteen, J., Sophocleous, M. A., Taniguchi, M., Alley, W. M., Allen, D. M., and Zhou, Y.: Groundwater sustainability strategies, Nat. Geosci., 3, 378–379, 2010.
Green, T. R., Taniguchi, M., Kooi, H., Gurdak, J. J., Allen, D. M., Hiscock, K. M., Treidel, H., and Aureli, A.: Beneath the surface of global change: Impacts of climate change on groundwater, J. Hydrol., 405, 532–560, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.002, 2011.
Haitjema, H.: The Role of Hand Calculations in Ground Water Flow Modeling, Ground Water, 44, 786–791, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00189.x, 2006.
Halsor, S. P., Orem, B. F., and Rudenko, D.: A multi-media field laboratory and the development of an undergraduate methods course in subsurface hydrogeology, Geological Association of America, Abstracts with Programs 30, 307 pp., 1998.
Hiscock, K. M.: Hydrogeology: principles and practice, Blackwell, 2005.
Horner, T. C., Cornwell, K., and Kusnick, J.: Use of active learning modules in water quality and stream flow to enhance understanding of the scientific method, Geological Association of America, Abstracts with Programs 30, 1998.
Hudak, P. F.: Visualizing ground-water-flow fields and contaminant plumes in an undergraduate hydrogeology course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 46, 132–36, 1998.
Kolb, D. A.: Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1984.
Laton, W. R.: Building Groundwater Monitoring Wells on Campus A Case Study and Primer, Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 50–53, 2006.
Lee, M.-K.: Hands-on laboratory exercises for an undergraduate hydrogeology course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 46, 433–438, 1998.
Lehr, J. H.: Ground-water flow models simulating subsurface conditions, Journal of Geological Education, 11, 124–132, 1963.
Macfarlane, P. A., Bohling, G., Thompson, K. W., and Townsend, M.: Helping Students Make the Transition from Novice Learner of Ground-water Concepts to Expert Using the Plume Busters Software, Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 610–619, 2006.
Mays, D. C.: One-Week Module on Stochastic Groundwater Modeling, Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 101–109, 2010.
McCray, J. E. and Thyne, G. D.: Joint Sustainability of Petroleum Energy Production and Water Resources, Ground Water, 47, p. 611, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00540.x, 2009.
McKay, L. D. and Kammer, T. W.: Incorporating hydrogeology in a mapping-based geology field camp, Journal of Geoscience Education, 47, 124–130, 1999.
Neuman, S. P.: Comment on "Siegel, D.: Reductionist hydrogeology: ten fundamental principles. Hydrol. Process., 22, 4967–4970, 2008", Hydrol. Process., 23, 1676–1677, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7280, 2009.
Neupauer, R. M.: Integrating Topics in an Introductory Hydrogeology Course through a Semester-long Hydraulic Containment Design Project, Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 225–234, 2008.
Ngambeki, I., Thompson, S. E., Troch, P. A., Sivapalan, M., and Evangelou, D.: Engaging the students of today and preparing the catchment hydrologists of tomorrow: student-centered approaches in hydrology education, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 707–740, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-707-2012, 2012.
Pathirana, A., Gersonius, B., and Radhakrishnan, M.: Web 2.0 collaboration tools to support student research in hydrology – an opinion, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 2541–2567, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-2541-2012, 2012.
Pederson, D.: Education and employment in hydrogeology, J. Geol. Educ., 35, 16–21, 1987.
Renshaw, C. E., Taylor, H. A., and Reynolds, C. H.: Impact of computer-assisted instruction in hydrogeolgy on critical-thinking skills, Journal of Geoscience Education, 46, 274–279, 1998.
Rimal, N. N. and Stieglitz, R. D.: Using available resources to enhance the teaching of hydrogeology, Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 508–513, 2000.
Rodhe, A.: Physical models for class-room teaching in hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 4135–4160, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-4135-2012, 2012.
Rojstaczer, S.: The limitations of groundwater models, J. Geol. Educ., 42, 362–368, 1994.
Sanders, L. L.: Teaching hydrogeology to undergraduate and graduate students, Geological Association of America, Abstracts with Programs 30, 305 pp., 1998.
Santi, P. M. and Higgins, J. D.: Preparing Geologists for Careers in Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 512–521, 2005.
Schwartz, F. W. and Zhang, H.: Fundamentals of Ground Water, Wiley, New York, 2003.
Siegel, D: Reductionist hydrogeology: ten fundamental principles, Hydrol. Process., 22, 4967–4970, 2008.
Siegel, D. and McKenzie, J. M.: Contamination in Orangetown: A Mock Trial and Site Investigation Exercise, Journal of Geoscience Education, 52, 266–273, 2004.
Singha, K.: An Active Learning Exercise for Introducing Ground-Water Extraction from Confined Aquifers, Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 131–135, 2008.
Sophocleous, M: Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science, Hydrogeol. J., 10, 52–67, 2002.
Tinker, J. R. J.: Technical writing in hydrogeology, J. Geol. Educ., 34, 25–27, 1986.
Tinker, J. R. J.: Undergraduate education in hydrogeology, J. Geol. Educ., 37, 20–23, 1989.
Todd, D. K.: Groundwater hydrology, Wiley, New York, 1980.
Trop, J. M., Krockover, G. H., and Ridgway, K. D.: Integration of field observations with laboratory modeling for undergraduate hydrologic processes in an undergraduate earth-science course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 514–520, 2000.
Wagener, T., Kelleher, C., Weiler, M., McGlynn, B., Gooseff, M., Marshall, L., Meixner, T., McGuire, K., Gregg, S., Sharma, P., and Zappe, S.: It takes a community to raise a hydrologist: the Modular Curriculum for Hydrologic Advancement (MOCHA), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 2321–2356, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-2321-2012, 2012.
Younger, P. L.: Groundwater in the environment, Blackwell, 2007.