Articles | Volume 29, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-983-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-983-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
25 Feb 2025
Research article |
| 25 Feb 2025
| 25 Feb 2025
Quantifying spatiotemporal and elevational precipitation gauge network uncertainty in the Canadian Rockies
André Bertoncini
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, 200 – 50 Lincoln Park, Canmore, AB T1W 3E9, Canada
John W. Pomeroy
Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, 200 – 50 Lincoln Park, Canmore, AB T1W 3E9, Canada
Related authors
Julie M. Thériault, Stephen J. Déry, John W. Pomeroy, Hilary M. Smith, Juris Almonte, André Bertoncini, Robert W. Crawford, Aurélie Desroches-Lapointe, Mathieu Lachapelle, Zen Mariani, Selina Mitchell, Jeremy E. Morris, Charlie Hébert-Pinard, Peter Rodriguez, and Hadleigh D. Thompson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1233–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1233-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1233-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article discusses the data that were collected during the Storms and Precipitation Across the continental Divide (SPADE) field campaign in spring 2019 in the Canadian Rockies, along the Alberta and British Columbia border. Various instruments were installed at five field sites to gather information about atmospheric conditions focussing on precipitation. Details about the field sites, the instrumentation used, the variables collected, and the collection methods and intervals are presented.
Kevin R. Shook, Paul H. Whitfield, Christopher Spence, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5173–5192, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies suggest that the velocities of water running off landscapes in the Canadian Prairies may be much smaller than generally assumed. Analyses of historical flows for 23 basins in central Alberta show that many of the rivers responded more slowly and that the flows are much slower than would be estimated from equations developed elsewhere. The effects of slow flow velocities on the development of hydrological models of the region are discussed, as are the possible causes.
Phillip Harder, Warren D. Helgason, and John W. Pomeroy
The Cryosphere, 18, 3277–3295, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3277-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Remote sensing the amount of water in snow (SWE) at high spatial resolutions is an unresolved challenge. In this work, we tested a drone-mounted passive gamma spectrometer to quantify SWE. We found that the gamma observations could resolve the average and spatial variability of SWE down to 22.5 m resolutions. Further, by combining drone gamma SWE and lidar snow depth we could estimate SWE at sub-metre resolutions which is a new opportunity to improve the measurement of shallow snowpacks.
Mazda Kompanizare, Diogo Costa, Merrin L. Macrae, John W. Pomeroy, and Richard M. Petrone
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2785–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new agricultural tile drainage module was developed in the Cold Region Hydrological Model platform. Tile flow and water levels are simulated by considering the effect of capillary fringe thickness, drainable water and seasonal regional groundwater dynamics. The model was applied to a small well-instrumented farm in southern Ontario, Canada, where there are concerns about the impacts of agricultural drainage into Lake Erie.
Zhihua He, Kevin Shook, Christopher Spence, John W. Pomeroy, and Colin Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3525–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the impacts of climate change on snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow over the Canadian Prairies. The entire prairie region was divided into seven basin types. We found strong variations of hydrological sensitivity to precipitation and temperature changes in different land covers and basins, which suggests that different water management and adaptation methods are needed to address enhanced water stress due to expected climate change in different regions of the prairies.
Marcos R. C. Cordeiro, Kang Liang, Henry F. Wilson, Jason Vanrobaeys, David A. Lobb, Xing Fang, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5917–5931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5917-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5917-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the issue of increasing interest in the hydrological impacts of converting cropland to perennial forage cover in the Canadian Prairies. By developing customized models using the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling (CRHM) platform, this long-term (1992–2013) modelling study is expected to provide stakeholders with science-based information regarding the hydrological impacts of land use conversion from annual crop to perennial forage cover in the Canadian Prairies.
Christopher Spence, Zhihua He, Kevin R. Shook, John W. Pomeroy, Colin J. Whitfield, and Jared D. Wolfe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5555–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5555-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5555-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We learnt how streamflow from small creeks could be altered by wetland removal in the Canadian Prairies, where this practice is pervasive. Every creek basin in the region was placed into one of seven groups. We selected one of these groups and used its traits to simulate streamflow. The model worked well enough so that we could trust the results even if we removed the wetlands. Wetland removal did not change low flow amounts very much, but it doubled high flow and tripled average flow.
Dhiraj Pradhananga and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2605–2616, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2605-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2605-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study considers the combined impacts of climate and glacier changes due to recession on the hydrology and water balance of two high-elevation glaciers. Peyto and Athabasca glacier basins in the Canadian Rockies have undergone continuous glacier loss over the last 3 to 5 decades, leading to an increase in ice exposure and changes to the elevation and slope of the glacier surfaces. Streamflow from these glaciers continues to increase more due to climate warming than glacier recession.
Christopher Spence, Zhihua He, Kevin R. Shook, Balew A. Mekonnen, John W. Pomeroy, Colin J. Whitfield, and Jared D. Wolfe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1801–1819, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We determined how snow and flow in small creeks change with temperature and precipitation in the Canadian Prairie, a region where water resources are often under stress. We tried something new. Every watershed in the region was placed in one of seven groups based on their landscape traits. We selected one of these groups and used its traits to build a model of snow and streamflow. It worked well, and by the 2040s there may be 20 %–40 % less snow and 30 % less streamflow than the 1980s.
Dhiraj Pradhananga, John W. Pomeroy, Caroline Aubry-Wake, D. Scott Munro, Joseph Shea, Michael N. Demuth, Nammy Hang Kirat, Brian Menounos, and Kriti Mukherjee
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2875–2894, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2875-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2875-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents hydrological, meteorological, glaciological and geospatial data of Peyto Glacier Basin in the Canadian Rockies. They include high-resolution DEMs derived from air photos and lidar surveys and long-term hydrological and glaciological model forcing datasets derived from bias-corrected reanalysis products. These data are crucial for studying climate change and variability in the basin and understanding the hydrological responses of the basin to both glacier and climate change.
Paul H. Whitfield, Philip D. A. Kraaijenbrink, Kevin R. Shook, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2513–2541, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2513-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2513-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using only warm season streamflow records, regime and change classifications were produced for ~ 400 watersheds in the Nelson and Mackenzie River basins, and trends in water storage and vegetation were detected from satellite imagery. Three areas show consistent changes: north of 60° (increased streamflow and basin greenness), in the western Boreal Plains (decreased streamflow and basin greenness), and across the Prairies (three different patterns of increased streamflow and basin wetness).
Chris M. DeBeer, Howard S. Wheater, John W. Pomeroy, Alan G. Barr, Jennifer L. Baltzer, Jill F. Johnstone, Merritt R. Turetsky, Ronald E. Stewart, Masaki Hayashi, Garth van der Kamp, Shawn Marshall, Elizabeth Campbell, Philip Marsh, Sean K. Carey, William L. Quinton, Yanping Li, Saman Razavi, Aaron Berg, Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Christopher Spence, Warren D. Helgason, Andrew M. Ireson, T. Andrew Black, Mohamed Elshamy, Fuad Yassin, Bruce Davison, Allan Howard, Julie M. Thériault, Kevin Shook, Michael N. Demuth, and Alain Pietroniro
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1849–1882, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1849-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1849-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article examines future changes in land cover and hydrological cycling across the interior of western Canada under climate conditions projected for the 21st century. Key insights into the mechanisms and interactions of Earth system and hydrological process responses are presented, and this understanding is used together with model application to provide a synthesis of future change. This has allowed more scientifically informed projections than have hitherto been available.
Julie M. Thériault, Stephen J. Déry, John W. Pomeroy, Hilary M. Smith, Juris Almonte, André Bertoncini, Robert W. Crawford, Aurélie Desroches-Lapointe, Mathieu Lachapelle, Zen Mariani, Selina Mitchell, Jeremy E. Morris, Charlie Hébert-Pinard, Peter Rodriguez, and Hadleigh D. Thompson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1233–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1233-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1233-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This article discusses the data that were collected during the Storms and Precipitation Across the continental Divide (SPADE) field campaign in spring 2019 in the Canadian Rockies, along the Alberta and British Columbia border. Various instruments were installed at five field sites to gather information about atmospheric conditions focussing on precipitation. Details about the field sites, the instrumentation used, the variables collected, and the collection methods and intervals are presented.
Vincent Vionnet, Christopher B. Marsh, Brian Menounos, Simon Gascoin, Nicholas E. Wayand, Joseph Shea, Kriti Mukherjee, and John W. Pomeroy
The Cryosphere, 15, 743–769, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-743-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-743-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snow cover provides critical supplies of fresh water to downstream users. Its accurate prediction requires inclusion of often-ignored processes. A multi-scale modelling strategy is presented that efficiently accounts for snow redistribution. Model accuracy is assessed via airborne lidar and optical satellite imagery. With redistribution the model captures the elevation–snow depth relation. Redistribution processes are required to reproduce spatial variability, such as around ridges.
Richard Essery, Hyungjun Kim, Libo Wang, Paul Bartlett, Aaron Boone, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Eleanor Burke, Matthias Cuntz, Bertrand Decharme, Emanuel Dutra, Xing Fang, Yeugeniy Gusev, Stefan Hagemann, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Kontu, Gerhard Krinner, Matthieu Lafaysse, Yves Lejeune, Thomas Marke, Danny Marks, Christoph Marty, Cecile B. Menard, Olga Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, John Pomeroy, Gerd Schädler, Vladimir Semenov, Tatiana Smirnova, Sean Swenson, Dmitry Turkov, Nander Wever, and Hua Yuan
The Cryosphere, 14, 4687–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are uncertain in predicting how warming changes snow cover. This paper compares 22 snow models with the same meteorological inputs. Predicted trends agree with observations at four snow research sites: winter snow cover does not start later, but snow now melts earlier in spring than in the 1980s at two of the sites. Cold regions where snow can last until late summer are predicted to be particularly sensitive to warming because the snow then melts faster at warmer times of year.
Cited articles
Asong, Z. E., Razavi, S., Wheater, H. S., and Wong, J. S.: Evaluation of Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) over Southern Canada against Ground Precipitation Observations: A Preliminary Assessment, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 1033–1050, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0187.1, 2017.
Avanzi, F., Ercolani, G., Gabellani, S., Cremonese, E., Pogliotti, P., Filippa, G., Morra di Cella, U., Ratto, S., Stevenin, H., Cauduro, M., and Juglair, S.: Learning about precipitation lapse rates from snow course data improves water balance modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2109–2131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2109-2021, 2021.
Barros, A. P. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Dynamic modeling of orographically induced precipitation, Rev. Geophys., 32, 265–284, https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG00625, 1994.
Bertoncini, A. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Daily Precipitation University of Saskatchewan Data and Uncertainty Estimation Code for the Canadian Rockies, Zenodo [data set] and [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14854262, 2025.
Biemans, H., Hutjes, R. W. A., Kabat, P., Strengers, B. J., Gerten, D., and Rost, S.: Effects of precipitation uncertainty on discharge calculations for main river basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 1011–1025, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1067.1, 2009.
Bonsal, B. and Regier, M.: Historical comparison of the 2001/2002 drought in the Canadian Prairies, Clim. Res., 33, 229–242, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr033229, 2007.
Brasnett, B.: A global analysis of snow depth for numerical weather prediction, J. Appl. Meteorol., 38, 726–740, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0726:AGAOSD>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Brunet, D. and Milbrandt, J. A.: Optimal Design of a Surface Precipitation Network in Canada, J. Hydrometeorol., 24, 727–742, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0085.1, 2023.
Cai, X., Wang, X., Jain, P., and Flannigan, M. D.: Evaluation of Gridded Precipitation Data and Interpolation Methods for Forest Fire Danger Rating in Alberta, Canada, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028754, 2019.
Cecinati, F., Wani, O., and Rico-Ramirez, M. A.: Comparing Approaches to Deal With Non-Gaussianity of Rainfall Data in Kriging-Based Radar-Gauge Rainfall Merging, Water Resour. Res., 53, 8999–9018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020330, 2017.
Chacon-Hurtado, J. C., Alfonso, L., and Solomatine, D. P.: Rainfall and streamflow sensor network design: a review of applications, classification, and a proposed framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3071–3091, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3071-2017, 2017.
Chegwidden, O. S., Rupp, D. E., and Nijssen, B.: Climate change alters flood magnitudes and mechanisms in climatically-diverse headwaters across the northwestern United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 094048, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab986f, 2020.
Contractor, S., Donat, M. G., Alexander, L. V., Ziese, M., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Schneider, U., Rustemeier, E., Becker, A., Durre, I., and Vose, R. S.: Rainfall Estimates on a Gridded Network (REGEN) – a global land-based gridded dataset of daily precipitation from 1950 to 2016, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 919–943, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-919-2020, 2020.
Coulibaly, P., Samuel, J., Pietroniro, A., and Harvey, D.: Evaluation of Canadian national hydrometric network density based on WMO 2008 standards, Can. Water Resour. J., 38, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2013.787181, 2012.
Daly, C., Gibson, W. P., Taylor, G. H., Doggett, M. K., and Smith, J. I.: Observer bias in daily precipitation measurements at United States Cooperative Network Stations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 899–912, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-6-899, 2007.
Daly, C., Halbleib, M., Smith, J. I., Gibson, W. P., Doggett, M. K., Taylor, G. H., Curtis, J., and Pasteris, P. P.: Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 2031–2064, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1688, 2008.
Daly, C., Slater, M. E., Roberti, J. A., Laseter, S. H., and Swift, L. W.: High-resolution precipitation mapping in a mountainous watershed: ground truth for evaluating uncertainty in a national precipitation dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 124–137, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4986, 2017.
Daly, C., Doggett, M. K., Smith, J. I., Olson, K. V., Halbleib, M. D., Dimcovic, Z., Keon, D., Loiselle, R. A., Steinberg, B., Ryan, A. D., Pancake, C. M., and Kaspar, E. M.: Challenges in Observation-Based Mapping of Daily Precipitation across the Conterminous United States, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 38, 1979–1992, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0054.1, 2021.
Dura, V., Evin, G., Favre, A.-C., and Penot, D.: Spatial variability in the seasonal precipitation lapse rates in complex topographical regions – application in France, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2579–2601, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2579-2024, 2024.
Ehlers, L. B., Sonnenborg, T. O., and Refsgaard, J. C.: Observational and predictive uncertainties for multiple variables in a spatially distributed hydrological model, Hydrol. Process., 33, 833–848, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13367, 2019.
Fang, X., Pomeroy, J. W., DeBeer, C. M., Harder, P., and Siemens, E.: Hydrometeorological data from Marmot Creek Research Basin, Canadian Rockies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 455–471, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-455-2019, 2019.
Gasset, N., Fortin, V., Dimitrijevic, M., Carrera, M., Bilodeau, B., Muncaster, R., Gaborit, É., Roy, G., Pentcheva, N., Bulat, M., Wang, X., Pavlovic, R., Lespinas, F., Khedhaouiria, D., and Mai, J.: A 10 km North American precipitation and land-surface reanalysis based on the GEM atmospheric model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4917–4945, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4917-2021, 2021.
Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics in soil science: State-of-the-art and perspectives, Geoderma, 89, 1–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00078-0, 1999.
Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall, J. Hydrol., 228, 113–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00144-X, 2000.
Harder, P. and Pomeroy, J.: Estimating precipitation phase using a psychrometric energy balance method, Hydrol. Process., 27, 1901–1914, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9799, 2013.
He, Z., Pomeroy, J. W., Fang, X., and Peterson, A.: Sensitivity analysis of hydrological processes to perturbed climate in a southern boreal forest basin, J. Hydrol., 601, 126706, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126706, 2021.
Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., and Rossiter, D. G.: About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies, Comput. Geosci., 33, 1301–1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001, 2007.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D., Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., and Iguchi, T.: The global precipitation measurement mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 701–722, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1, 2014.
Houze, R. A.: Orographic effects on precipitating clouds, Rev. Geophys., 50, 1–47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000365, 2012.
Houze, R. A. and Medina, S.: Turbulence as a mechanism for orographic precipitation enhancement, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3599–3623, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3555.1, 2005.
Jiang, Q. and Smith, R. B.: Cloud Timescales and Orographic Precipitation, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1543–1559, https://doi.org/10.1175/2995.1, 2003.
Jing, X., Geerts, B., Wang, Y., and Liu, C.: Evaluating seasonal orographic precipitation in the interior western United States using gauge data, gridded precipitation estimates, and a regional climate simulation, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 2541–2558, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0056.1, 2017.
Jing, X., Geerts, B., Wang, Y., and Liu, C.: Ambient factors controlling the wintertime precipitation distribution across mountain ranges in the interior western United States. Part II: Changes in orographic precipitation distribution in a pseudo-global warming simulation, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 695–715, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0173.1, 2019.
Kabir, T., Pokhrel, Y., and Felfelani, F.: On the Precipitation-Induced Uncertainties in Process-Based Hydrological Modeling in the Mekong River Basin, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030828, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030828, 2022.
Kidd, C., Becker, A., Huffman, G. J., Muller, C. L., Joe, P., Skofronick-Jackson, G., and Kirschbaum, D. B.: So, how much of the Earth's surface is covered by rain gauges?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 69–78, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00283.1, 2017.
Kochendorfer, J., Nitu, R., Wolff, M., Mekis, E., Rasmussen, R., Baker, B., Earle, M. E., Reverdin, A., Wong, K., Smith, C. D., Yang, D., Roulet, Y.-A., Buisan, S., Laine, T., Lee, G., Aceituno, J. L. C., Alastrué, J., Isaksen, K., Meyers, T., Brækkan, R., Landolt, S., Jachcik, A., and Poikonen, A.: Analysis of single-Alter-shielded and unshielded measurements of mixed and solid precipitation from WMO-SPICE, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3525–3542, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3525-2017, 2017.
Krajewski, W. F. and Smith, J. A.: Radar hydrology: Rainfall estimation, Adv. Water Resour., 25, 1387–1394, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00062-3, 2002.
Kyriakidis, P. C., Kim, J., and Miller, N. L.: Geostatistical mapping of precipitation from rain gauge data using atmospheric and terrain characteristics, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1855–1877, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1855:GMOPFR>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Lebrenz, H. and Bárdossy, A.: Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1633–1648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, 2019.
Lehning, M., Löwe, H., Ryser, M., and Raderschall, N.: Inhomogeneous precipitation distribution and snow transport in steep terrain, Water Resour. Res., 44, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006545, 2008.
Lespinas, F., Fortin, V., Roy, G., Rasmussen, P., and Stadnyk, T.: Performance Evaluation of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA), J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 2045–2064, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0191.1, 2015.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Alsdorf, D., Dozier, J., Huffman, G. J., Pan, M., and Wood, E. F.: Inroads of remote sensing into hydrologic science during the WRR era, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7309–7342, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017616, 2015.
Li, Y., Szeto, K., Stewart, R. E., Thériault, J. M., Chena, L., Kochtubajda, B., Liu, A., Boodoo, S., Goodson, R., Mooney, C., and Kurkute, S.: A numerical study of the June 2013 flood-producing extreme rainstorm over Southern Alberta, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 2057–2078, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0176.1, 2017.
Li, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Kurkute, S., Scaff, L., and Pan, X.: High-resolution regional climate modeling and projection over western Canada using a weather research forecasting model with a pseudo-global warming approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4635–4659, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4635-2019, 2019.
Liston, G. E. and Elder, K.: A Meteorological Distribution System for High-Resolution Terrestrial Modeling (MicroMet), J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 217–234, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM486.1, 2006.
Lucas-Picher, P., Argüeso, D., Brisson, E., Tramblay, Y., Berg, P., Lemonsu, A., Kotlarski, S., and Caillaud, C.: Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps, WIRes Clim. Change, 12, 1–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.731, 2021.
Lundquist, J., Hughes, M., Gutmann, E., and Kapnick, S.: Our skill in modeling mountain rain and snow is bypassing the skill of our observational networks, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 2473–2490, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1, 2019.
Ly, S., Charles, C., and Degré, A.: Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: the use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2259–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011, 2011.
Madole, R. F., Bradley, W. C., Loewenherz, D. S., Ritter, D. F., Rutter, N. W., and Thorn, C. E.: Rocky Mountains, in: Geomorphic systems of North America, edited by: Graf, W. L., Geological Society of America, 211–257, ISBN 0813753023, 1987.
Masson, D. and Frei, C.: Spatial analysis of precipitation in a high-mountain region: exploring methods with multi-scale topographic predictors and circulation types, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4543–4563, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4543-2014, 2014.
Medina, S. and Houze, R. A.: Air motions and precipitation growth in Alpine storms, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 345–371, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.13, 2003.
Mekis, E., Donaldson, N., Reid, J., Zucconi, A., Hoover, J., Li, Q., Nitu, R., and Melo, S.: An Overview of Surface-Based Precipitation Observations at Environment and Climate Change Canada, Atmos. Ocean, 56, 71–95, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2018.1433627, 2018.
Milbrandt, J. A., Bélair, S., Faucher, M., Vallée, M., Carrera, M. L., and Glazer, A.: The pan-canadian high resolution (2.5 km) deterministic prediction system, Weather Forecast., 31, 1791–1816, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0035.1, 2016.
Milrad, S. M., Lombardo, K., Atallah, E. H., and Gyakum, J. R.: Numerical simulations of the 2013 Alberta flood: Dynamics, thermodynamics, and the role of orography, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 3049–3072, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0336.1, 2017.
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021.
Napoli, A., Crespi, A., Ragone, F., Maugeri, M., and Pasquero, C.: Variability of orographic enhancement of precipitation in the Alpine region, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49974-5, 2019.
NWS: Snow Measurement Guidelines for National Weather Service Surface Observing Programs, Technical report, National Weather Service, 1–14, 2013.
Pan, X., Yang, D., Li, Y., Barr, A., Helgason, W., Hayashi, M., Marsh, P., Pomeroy, J., and Janowicz, R. J.: Bias corrections of precipitation measurements across experimental sites in different ecoclimatic regions of western Canada, The Cryosphere, 10, 2347–2360, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2347-2016, 2016.
Pan, X., Helgason, W., Ireson, A., and Wheater, H.: Field-scale water balance closure in seasonally frozen conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5401–5413, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5401-2017, 2017.
Pebesma, E. J.: Multivariable geostatistics in S: The gstat package, Comput. Geosci., 30, 683–691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012, 2004.
Peli, R., Menafoglio, A., Cervino, M., Dovera, L., and Secchi, P.: Physics-based Residual Kriging for dynamically evolving functional random fields, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 36, 3063–3080, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02180-8, 2022.
Phillips, D. L., Dolph, J., and Marks, D.: A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation in mountainous terrain, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 58, 119–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(92)90114-J, 1992.
Pomeroy, J. W., Fang, X., and Marks, D. G.: The cold rain-on-snow event of June 2013 in the Canadian Rockies – characteristics and diagnosis, Hydrol. Process., 30, 2899–2914, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10905, 2016.
Qi, W., Liu, J., Xia, J., and Chen, D.: Divergent sensitivity of surface water and energy variables to precipitation product uncertainty in the Tibetan Plateau, J. Hydrol., 581, 124338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124338, 2020.
Queen, L. E., Mote, P. W., Rupp, D. E., Chegwidden, O., and Nijssen, B.: Ubiquitous increases in flood magnitude in the Columbia River basin under climate change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 257–272, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-257-2021, 2021.
Rasouli, K., Pomeroy, J. W., Janowicz, J. R., Carey, S. K., and Williams, T. J.: Hydrological sensitivity of a northern mountain basin to climate change, Hydrol. Process., 28, 4191–4208, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10244, 2014.
Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., and Jarvis, A.: An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 21, 983–1008, https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601169899, 2007.
Ross, A., Smith, C. D., and Barr, A.: An improved post-processing technique for automatic precipitation gauge time series, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2979–2994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2979-2020, 2020.
Schreiner-McGraw, A. P. and Ajami, H.: Impact of Uncertainty in Precipitation Forcing Data Sets on the Hydrologic Budget of an Integrated Hydrologic Model in Mountainous Terrain, Water Resour. Res., 56, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027639, 2020.
Schuurmans, J. M., Bierkens, M. F. P., Pebesma, E. J., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Automatic prediction of high-resolution daily rainfall fields for multiple extents: The potential of operational radar, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 1204–1224, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM792.1, 2007.
Sha, Y., Gagne, D. J., West, G., and Stull, R.: Deep-learning-based precipitation observation quality control, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 38, 1075–1091, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0081.1, 2021.
Shepard, D.: A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data, Proc. 1968 23rd ACM Natl. Conf. ACM 1968, New York, 27–29 August 1968, 517–524, https://doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616, 1968.
Sideris, I. V., Gabella, M., Erdin, R., and Germann, U.: Real-time radar-rain-gauge merging using spatio-temporal co-kriging with external drift in the alpine terrain of Switzerland, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1097–1111, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2188, 2014.
Skofronick-Jackson, G., Kulie, M., Milani, L., Munchak, S. J., Wood, N. B., and Levizzani, V.: Satellite estimation of falling snow: A global precipitation measurement (GPM) core observatory perspective, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 1429–1448, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0124.1, 2019.
Smith, C. D.: Correcting the wind bias in snowfall measurements made with a Geonor T-200B precipitation gauge and Alter wind shield, in: Proceedings of the 14th SMOI, San Antonio, 15–18 January 2007, 6, 2007.
Smith, R. B. and Barstad, I.: A Linear Theory of Orographic Precipitation, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1377–1391, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1377:ALTOOP>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Michael, S., Ma, Z., and Hong, Y.: Have satellite precipitation products improved over last two decades? A comprehensive comparison of GPM IMERG with nine satellite and reanalysis datasets, Remote Sens. Environ., 240, 111697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111697, 2020.
Thériault, J. M., Hung, I., Vaquer, P., Stewart, R. E., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Precipitation characteristics and associated weather conditions on the eastern slopes of the Canadian Rockies during March–April 2015, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4491–4512, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4491-2018, 2018.
Thériault, J. M., Leroux, N. R., Stewart, R. E., Bertoncini, A., Déry, S. J., Pomeroy, J. W., Thompson, H. D., Smith, H., Mariani, Z., Desroches-Lapointe, A., Mitchell, S., and Almonte, J.: Storms and Precipitation Across the Continental Divide Experiment (SPADE), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, 2628–2649, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-21-0146.1, 2022.
Thiessen, A. H.: Precipitation Averages for Large Areas, Mon. Weather Rev., 39, 1082–1089, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1911)39<1082b:PAFLA>2.0.CO;2, 1911.
Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., and White, M. A.: Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain, J. Hydrol., 190, 214–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03128-9, 1997.
van Hyfte, S., Le Moigne, P., Bazile, E., Verrelle, A., and Boone, A.: High-Resolution Reanalysis of Daily Precipitation using AROME Model Over France, Tellus A, 75, 27–49, https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusa.95, 2023.
Vanella, D., Longo-Minnolo, G., Belfiore, O. R., Ramírez-Cuesta, J. M., Pappalardo, S., Consoli, S., D'Urso, G., Chirico, G. B., Coppola, A., Comegna, A., Toscano, A., Quarta, R., Provenzano, G., Ippolito, M., Castagna, A., and Gandolfi, C.: Comparing the use of ERA5 reanalysis dataset and ground-based agrometeorological data under different climates and topography in Italy, J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 42, 101182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101182, 2022.
Viviroli, D., Kummu, M., Meybeck, M., Kallio, M., and Wada, Y.: Increasing dependence of lowland populations on mountain water resources, Nat. Sustain., 3, 917–928, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0559-9, 2020.
Wheaton, E., Kulshreshtha, S., Wittrock, V., and Koshida, G.: Dry times: Hard lessons from the Canadian drought of 2001 and 2002, Can. Geogr., 52, 241–262, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2008.00211.x, 2008.
WMO: Guide to Hydrological Practices. Vol. I: Hydrology – From Measurement to Hydrological Information, 296 pp., ISBN 978-92-63-30168-0, 2008.
Yang, D., Goodison, B. E., Ishida, S., and Benson, C. S.: Adjustment of daily precipitation data at 10 climate stations in Alaska: Application of World Meteorological Organization intercomparison results, Water Resour. Res., 34, 241–256, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR02681, 1998.
Zoccatelli, D., Borga, M., Chirico, G. B., and Nikolopoulos, E. I.: The relative role of hillslope and river network routing in the hydrologic response to spatially variable rainfall fields, J. Hydrol., 531, 349–359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.014, 2015.
Short summary
Rainfall and snowfall spatial estimation for hydrological purposes is often compromised in cold mountain regions due to inaccessibility, creating sparse gauge networks with few high-elevation gauges. This study developed a framework for quantifying gauge network uncertainty, considering elevation to aid in future gauge placement in mountain regions. Results show that gauge placement above 2000 m is the most cost-effective measure to decrease gauge network uncertainty in the Canadian Rockies.
Rainfall and snowfall spatial estimation for hydrological purposes is often compromised in cold...
