Articles | Volume 29, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-127-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-127-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Jan 2025
Research article |
| 14 Jan 2025
| 14 Jan 2025
Improving the hydrological consistency of a process-based solute-transport model by simultaneous calibration of streamflow and stream concentrations
Jordy Salmon-Monviola
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
UMR SAS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Rennes, France
Ophélie Fovet
UMR SAS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Rennes, France
Markus Hrachowitz
Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Hatice Türk, Christine Stumpp, Markus Hrachowitz, Karsten Schulz, Peter Strauss, Günter Blöschl, and Michael Stockinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3935–3956, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3935-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3935-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using advances in transit time estimation and tracer data, we tested if fast-flow transit times are controlled solely by soil moisture or if they are also controlled by precipitation intensity. We used soil-moisture-dependent and precipitation-intensity-conditional transfer functions. We showed that a significant portion of event water bypasses the soil matrix through fast flow paths (overland flow, tile drains, preferential-flow paths) in dry soil conditions for both low- and high-intensity precipitation.
Magali Ponds, Sarah Hanus, Harry Zekollari, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Gerrit Schoups, Roland Kaitna, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3545–3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines how future climate changes impact root zone storage, a key hydrological model parameter. Root zone storage – the soil water accessible to plants – adapts to climate but is often kept constant in models. We estimated climate-adapted storage in six Austrian Alps catchments. While storage increased, streamflow projections showed minimal change, which suggests that dynamic root zone representation is less critical in humid regions but warrants further study in arid areas.
Hatice Türk, Christine Stumpp, Markus Hrachowitz, Peter Strauss, Günter Blöschl, and Michael Stockinger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2597, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that stream flow isotope data (δ2H) were inadequate for distinguishing preferential groundwater flow. Large passive groundwater storage dampened δ2H variations, obscuring signals of fast groundwater flow and complicating the estimation of older water fractions in the streams. Further, weekly-resolution δ2H sampling yielded deceptively high model performance, highlighting the need for complementary and groundwater-level data to improve catchment-scale transit-time estimates.
Nicolai Brekenfeld, Solenn Cotel, Mikael Faucheux, Colin Fourtet, Yannick Hamon, Patrice Petitjean, Arnaud Blanchouin, Celine Bouillis, Marie-Claire Pierret, Hocine Henine, Anne-Catherine Pierson-Wickmann, Sophie Guillon, Paul Floury, and Ophelie Fovet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2615–2631, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2615-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2615-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In the last decade, the development of on-site field laboratories to measure water chemistry at sub-hourly measurement intervals has drastically advanced, while there is no literature that provides detailed technical, organisational and operational guidelines in running such equipment. Based on our experiences of running three French field laboratories over 7 years, we share the main stages in the deployment of this tool in the field, the difficulties encountered and the proposed solutions.
Nathalie Rombeek, Markus Hrachowitz, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1502, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1502, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
On 29 October 2024 Valencia (Spain) was struck by torrential rainfall, triggering devastating floods in this area. In this study, we quantify and describe the spatial and temporal structure of this rainfall event using personal weather stations (PWSs). These PWSs provide near real-time observations at a temporal resolution of ~5 min. This study shows the potential of PWSs for real-time rainfall monitoring and potentially flood early warning systems by complementing dedicated rain gauge networks.
Muhammad Ibrahim, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Ruud van der Ent, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1703–1723, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The quantification of precipitation into evaporation and runoff is vital for water resources management. The Budyko framework, based on aridity and evaporative indices of a catchment, can be an ideal tool for that. However, recent research highlights deviations of catchments from the expected evaporative index, casting doubt on its reliability. This study quantifies deviations of 2387 catchments, finding them minor and predictable. Integrating these into predictions upholds the framework's efficacy.
Wouter R. Berghuijs, Ross A. Woods, Bailey J. Anderson, Anna Luisa Hemshorn de Sánchez, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1319–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1319-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1319-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Water balances of catchments will often strongly depend on their state in the recent past, but such memory effects may persist at annual timescales. We use global data sets to show that annual memory is typically absent in precipitation but strong in terrestrial water stores and also present in evaporation and streamflow (including low flows and floods). Our experiments show that hysteretic models provide behaviour that is consistent with these observed memory behaviours.
Thiago Victor Medeiros do Nascimento, Julia Rudlang, Sebastian Gnann, Jan Seibert, Markus Hrachowitz, and Fabrizio Fenicia
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-739, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-739, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Large-sample hydrological studies often overlook the importance of detailed landscape data in explaining river flow variability. Analyzing over 4,000 European catchments, we found that geology becomes a dominant factor—especially for baseflow—when using detailed regional maps. This highlights the need for high-resolution geological data to improve river flow regionalization, particularly in non-monitored areas.
Nathalie Rombeek, Markus Hrachowitz, Arjan Droste, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3207, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3207, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Rain gauge networks from personal weather stations (PWSs) have a network density 100 times higher than dedicated rain gauge networks in the Netherlands. However, PWSs are prone to several sources of error, as they are generally not installed and maintained according to international guidelines. This study systematically quantifies and describes the uncertainties arising from PWS rainfall estimates. In particular, the focus is on the highest rainfall accumulations.
Nienke Tempel, Laurène Bouaziz, Riccardo Taormina, Ellis van Noppen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4577–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the impact of climatic variability on root zone water storage capacities and, thus, on hydrological predictions. Analysing data from 286 areas in Europe and the US, we found that, despite some variations in root zone storage capacity due to changing climatic conditions over multiple decades, these changes are generally minor and have a limited effect on water storage and river flow predictions.
Hongkai Gao, Markus Hrachowitz, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Fabrizio Fenicia, Qiaojuan Xi, Jianyang Xia, Wei Shao, Ge Sun, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4477–4499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The concept of the root zone is widely used but lacks a precise definition. Its importance in Earth system science is not well elaborated upon. Here, we clarified its definition with several similar terms to bridge the multi-disciplinary gap. We underscore the key role of the root zone in the Earth system, which links the biosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, atmosphere, and anthroposphere. To better represent the root zone, we advocate for a paradigm shift towards ecosystem-centred modelling.
Nicolai Brekenfeld, Solenn Cotel, Mikaël Faucheux, Paul Floury, Colin Fourtet, Jérôme Gaillardet, Sophie Guillon, Yannick Hamon, Hocine Henine, Patrice Petitjean, Anne-Catherine Pierson-Wickmann, Marie-Claire Pierret, and Ophélie Fovet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4309–4329, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4309-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4309-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The proposed methodology consists of simultaneously analysing the concentration variation of solute pairs during a storm event by plotting the concentration variation of one solute against the variation of another solute. This can reveal whether two or more end-members contribute to streamflow during a storm event. Furthermore, the variation of the solute ratios during the events can indicate which catchment processes are dominant and which are negligible.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Fransje van Oorschot, Ruud J. van der Ent, Andrea Alessandri, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2313–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2313-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2313-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation plays a crucial role in regulating the water cycle by transporting water from the subsurface to the atmosphere via roots; this transport depends on the extent of the root system. In this study, we quantified the effect of irrigation on roots at a global scale. Our results emphasize the importance of accounting for irrigation in estimating the vegetation root extent, which is essential to adequately represent the water cycle in hydrological and climate models.
Fransje van Oorschot, Ruud J. van der Ent, Markus Hrachowitz, Emanuele Di Carlo, Franco Catalano, Souhail Boussetta, Gianpaolo Balsamo, and Andrea Alessandri
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1239–1259, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1239-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1239-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation largely controls land hydrology by transporting water from the subsurface to the atmosphere through roots and is highly variable in space and time. However, current land surface models have limitations in capturing this variability at a global scale, limiting accurate modeling of land hydrology. We found that satellite-based vegetation variability considerably improved modeled land hydrology and therefore has potential to improve climate predictions of, for example, droughts.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Baibaswata Bhaduri, Ophelie Fovet, Sekhar Muddu, and Laurent Ruiz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-112, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-112, 2023
Publication in HESS not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
Lumped conceptual groundwater transit time models are widely used for their computational simplicity. But their parameters being empirical, these models are often criticized for their calibration reliance. This study mathematically links lumped conceptual parameters to measurable hydrodynamic properties of a groundwater catchment. This kind of direct parameterization gives lumped models a forward modelling potential, and also improves the choice of parameter constraints in calibration exercises.
Pau Wiersma, Jerom Aerts, Harry Zekollari, Markus Hrachowitz, Niels Drost, Matthias Huss, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5971–5986, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We test whether coupling a global glacier model (GloGEM) with a global hydrological model (PCR-GLOBWB 2) leads to a more realistic glacier representation and to improved basin runoff simulations across 25 large-scale basins. The coupling does lead to improved glacier representation, mainly by accounting for glacier flow and net glacier mass loss, and to improved basin runoff simulations, mostly in strongly glacier-influenced basins, which is where the coupling has the most impact.
Judith Uwihirwe, Alessia Riveros, Hellen Wanjala, Jaap Schellekens, Frederiek Sperna Weiland, Markus Hrachowitz, and Thom A. Bogaard
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3641–3661, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study compared gauge-based and satellite-based precipitation products. Similarly, satellite- and hydrological model-derived soil moisture was compared to in situ soil moisture and used in landslide hazard assessment and warning. The results reveal the cumulative 3 d rainfall from the NASA-GPM to be the most effective landslide trigger. The modelled antecedent soil moisture in the root zone was the most informative hydrological variable for landslide hazard assessment and warning in Rwanda.
Judith Uwihirwe, Markus Hrachowitz, and Thom Bogaard
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1723–1742, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1723-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1723-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This research tested the value of regional groundwater level information to improve landslide predictions with empirical models based on the concept of threshold levels. In contrast to precipitation-based thresholds, the results indicated that relying on threshold models exclusively defined using hydrological variables such as groundwater levels can lead to improved landslide predictions due to their implicit consideration of long-term antecedent conditions until the day of landslide occurrence.
Elisa Ragno, Markus Hrachowitz, and Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1695–1711, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1695-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1695-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We explore the ability of non-parametric Bayesian networks to reproduce maximum daily discharge in a given month in a catchment when the remaining hydro-meteorological and catchment attributes are known. We show that a saturated network evaluated in an individual catchment can reproduce statistical characteristics of discharge in about ~ 40 % of the cases, while challenges remain when a saturated network considering all the catchments together is evaluated.
Nataline Simon, Olivier Bour, Mikaël Faucheux, Nicolas Lavenant, Hugo Le Lay, Ophélie Fovet, Zahra Thomas, and Laurent Longuevergne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1459–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1459-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1459-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater discharge into streams plays a major role in the preservation of stream ecosystems. There were two complementary methods, both based on the use of the distributed temperature sensing technology, applied in a headwater catchment. Measurements allowed us to characterize the spatial and temporal patterns of groundwater discharge and quantify groundwater inflows into the stream, opening very promising perspectives for a novel characterization of the groundwater–stream interface.
Laurène J. E. Bouaziz, Emma E. Aalbers, Albrecht H. Weerts, Mark Hegnauer, Hendrik Buiteveld, Rita Lammersen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1295–1318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1295-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1295-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assuming stationarity of hydrological systems is no longer appropriate when considering land use and climate change. We tested the sensitivity of hydrological predictions to changes in model parameters that reflect ecosystem adaptation to climate and potential land use change. We estimated a 34 % increase in the root zone storage parameter under +2 K global warming, resulting in up to 15 % less streamflow in autumn, due to 14 % higher summer evaporation, compared to a stationary system.
Markus Hrachowitz, Michael Stockinger, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Ruud van der Ent, Heye Bogena, Andreas Lücke, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4887–4915, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Deforestation affects how catchments store and release water. Here we found that deforestation in the study catchment led to a 20 % increase in mean runoff, while reducing the vegetation-accessible water storage from about 258 to 101 mm. As a consequence, fractions of young water in the stream increased by up to 25 % during wet periods. This implies that water and solutes are more rapidly routed to the stream, which can, after contamination, lead to increased contaminant peak concentrations.
Fransje van Oorschot, Ruud J. van der Ent, Markus Hrachowitz, and Andrea Alessandri
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 725–743, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-725-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The roots of vegetation largely control the Earth's water cycle by transporting water from the subsurface to the atmosphere but are not adequately represented in land surface models, causing uncertainties in modeled water fluxes. We replaced the root parameters in an existing model with more realistic ones that account for a climate control on root development and found improved timing of modeled river discharge. Further extension of our approach could improve modeled water fluxes globally.
Sarah Hanus, Markus Hrachowitz, Harry Zekollari, Gerrit Schoups, Miren Vizcaino, and Roland Kaitna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3429–3453, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the effects of climate change on runoff patterns in six Alpine catchments in Austria at the end of the 21st century. Our results indicate a substantial shift to earlier occurrences in annual maximum and minimum flows in high-elevation catchments. Magnitudes of annual extremes are projected to increase under a moderate emission scenario in all catchments. Changes are generally more pronounced for high-elevation catchments.
Stella Guillemot, Ophelie Fovet, Chantal Gascuel-Odoux, Gérard Gruau, Antoine Casquin, Florence Curie, Camille Minaudo, Laurent Strohmenger, and Florentina Moatar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2491–2511, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2491-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2491-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the drivers of spatial variations in stream water quality in poorly studied headwater catchments and includes multiple elements involved in major water quality issues, such as eutrophication. We used a regional public dataset of monthly stream water concentrations monitored for 10 years over 185 agricultural catchments. We found a spatial and seasonal opposition between carbon and nitrogen concentrations, while phosphorus concentrations showed another spatial pattern.
Artemis Roodari, Markus Hrachowitz, Farzad Hassanpour, and Mostafa Yaghoobzadeh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1943–1967, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1943-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1943-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In a combined data analysis and modeling study in the transboundary Helmand River basin, we analyzed spatial patterns of drought and changes therein based on the drought indices as well as on absolute water deficits. Overall the results illustrate that flow deficits and the associated droughts clearly reflect the dynamic interplay between temporally varying regional differences in hydro-meteorological variables together with subtle and temporally varying effects linked to human intervention.
Laurène J. E. Bouaziz, Fabrizio Fenicia, Guillaume Thirel, Tanja de Boer-Euser, Joost Buitink, Claudia C. Brauer, Jan De Niel, Benjamin J. Dewals, Gilles Drogue, Benjamin Grelier, Lieke A. Melsen, Sotirios Moustakas, Jiri Nossent, Fernando Pereira, Eric Sprokkereef, Jasper Stam, Albrecht H. Weerts, Patrick Willems, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1069–1095, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1069-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1069-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify the differences in internal states and fluxes of 12 process-based models with similar streamflow performance and assess their plausibility using remotely sensed estimates of evaporation, snow cover, soil moisture and total storage anomalies. The dissimilarities in internal process representation imply that these models cannot all simultaneously be close to reality. Therefore, we invite modelers to evaluate their models using multiple variables and to rely on multi-model studies.
Petra Hulsman, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 957–982, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-957-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-957-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite observations have increasingly been used for model calibration, while model structural developments largely rely on discharge data. For large river basins, this often results in poor representations of system internal processes. This study explores the combined use of satellite-based evaporation and total water storage data for model structural improvement and spatial–temporal model calibration for a large, semi-arid and data-scarce river system.
Ralf Loritz, Markus Hrachowitz, Malte Neuper, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 147–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-147-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-147-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the role and value of distributed rainfall in the runoff generation of a mesoscale catchment. We compare the performance of different hydrological models at different periods and show that a distributed model driven by distributed rainfall yields improved performances only during certain periods. We then step beyond this finding and develop a spatially adaptive model that is capable of dynamically adjusting its spatial model structure in time.
Cited articles
Adeyeri, O. E., Laux, P., Arnault, J., Lawin, A. E., and Kunstmann, H.: Conceptual hydrological model calibration using multi-objective optimization techniques over the transboundary Komadugu-Yobe basin, Lake Chad Area, West Africa, J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud., 27, 100655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100655, 2020.
Anderson, T. R., Groffman, P. M., Kaushal, S. S., and Walter, M. T.: Shallow Groundwater Denitrification in Riparian Zones of a Headwater Agricultural Landscape, J. Environ. Qual., 43, 732–744, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.07.0303, 2014.
Aubert, A. H., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Gruau, G., Akkal, N., Faucheux, M., Fauvel, Y., Grimaldi, C., Hamon, Y., Jaffrézic, A., Lecoz-Boutnik, M., Molénat, J., Petitjean, P., Ruiz, L., and Merot, P.: Solute transport dynamics in small, shallow groundwater-dominated agricultural catchments: insights from a high-frequency, multisolute 10 yr-long monitoring study, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1379–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1379-2013, 2013.
Barton, L., McLay, C. D. A., Schipper, L. A., and Smith, C. T.: Annual denitrification rates in agricultural and forest soils: a review, Aust. J. Soil Res., 37, 1073–1073, 1999.
Basu, N. B., Destouni, G., Jawitz, J. W., Thompson, S. E., Loukinova, N. V., Darracq, A., Zanardo, S., Yaeger, M., Sivapalan, M., Rinaldo, A., and Rao, P. S. C.: Nutrient loads exported from managed catchments reveal emergent biogeochemical stationarity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L23404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045168, 2010.
Benettin, P., van der Velde, Y., van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., Rinaldo, A., and Botter, G.: Chloride circulation in a lowland catchment and the formulation of transport by travel time distributions, Water Resour. Res., 49, 4619–4632, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20309, 2013.
Benettin, P., Rodriguez, N. B., Sprenger, M., Kim, M., Klaus, J., Harman, C. J., van der Velde, Y., Hrachowitz, M., Botter, G., McGuire, K. J., Kirchner, J. W., Rinaldo, A., and McDonnell, J. J.: Transit Time Estimation in Catchments: Recent Developments and Future Directions, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2022WR033096, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033096, 2022.
Bennett, K. E., Cherry, J. E., Balk, B., and Lindsey, S.: Using MODIS estimates of fractional snow cover area to improve streamflow forecasts in interior Alaska, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2439–2459, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2439-2019, 2019.
Benoit, M. and Veysset, P.: Calcul des Unités Gros Bétails: proposition d'une méthode basée sur les besoins énergétiques pour affiner l'étude des systèmes d'élevage, INRAE Productions Animales, 34, 139–160, https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2021.34.2.4855, 2021.
Beven, K.: On hypothesis testing in hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 15, 1655–1657, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.436, 2001.
Beven, K.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007, 2006.
Beven, K.: So how much of your error is epistemic? Lessons from Japan and Italy, Hydrol. Process., 27, 1677–1680, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9648, 2013.
Beven, K. and Westerberg, I.: On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference, Hydrol. Process., 25, 1676–1680, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7963, 2011.
Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer, in: 2nd Edn., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, Hoboken, NJ, 457 pp., ISBN 80470714591, 2012.
Bieroza, M. Z., Heathwaite, A. L., Bechmann, M., Kyllmar, K., and Jordan, P.: The concentration-discharge slope as a tool for water quality management, Sci. Total Environ., 630, 738–749, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.256, 2018.
Birkel, C. and Soulsby, C.: Linking tracers, water age and conceptual models to identify dominant runoff processes in a sparsely monitored humid tropical catchment, Hydrol. Process., 30, 4477–4493, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10941, 2016.
Birkel, C., Tetzlaff, D., Dunn, S. M., and Soulsby, C.: Using time domain and geographic source tracers to conceptualize streamflow generation processes in lumped rainfall-runoff models: Dual-Tracer Conceptualized Streamflow Generation, Water Resour. Res., 47, W02515, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009547, 2011.
Birkel, C., Soulsby, C., and Tetzlaff, D.: Integrating parsimonious models of hydrological connectivity and soil biogeochemistry to simulate stream DOC dynamics: Parsimonious Coupled DOC Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 1030–1047, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002551, 2014.
Birkel, C., Soulsby, C., and Tetzlaff, D.: Conceptual modelling to assess how the interplay of hydrological connectivity, catchment storage and tracer dynamics controls nonstationary water age estimates, Hydrol. Process., 29, 2956–2969, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10414, 2015.
Birkel, C., Broder, T., and Biester, H.: Nonlinear and threshold-dominated runoff generation controls DOC export in a small peat catchment: Nonlinear Flow Paths Control DOC Export, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 498–513, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003621, 2017.
Birkel, C., Duvert, C., Correa, A., Munksgaard, N. C., Maher, D. T., and Hutley, L. B.: Tracer-Aided Modeling in the Low-Relief, Wet-Dry Tropics Suggests Water Ages and DOC Export Are Driven by Seasonal Wetlands and Deep Groundwater, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026175, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026175, 2020.
Blazkova, S., Beven, K. J., and Kulasova, A.: On constraining TOPMODEL hydrograph simulations using partial saturated area information, Hydrol. Process., 16, 441–458, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.331, 2002.
Blöschl, G.: Scaling in hydrology: Invited Commentary, Hydrol. Process., 15, 709–711, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.432, 2001.
Böhlke, J. K., Antweiler, R. C., Harvey, J. W., Laursen, A. E., Smith, L. K., Smith, R. L., and Voytek, M. A.: Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA, Biogeochemistry, 93, 117–141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9282-8, 2009.
Botter, G., Bertuzzo, E., and Rinaldo, A.: Catchment residence and travel time distributions: The master equation: Catchment Residence Times, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L11403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047666, 2011.
Bouaziz, L., Weerts, A., Schellekens, J., Sprokkereef, E., Stam, J., Savenije, H., and Hrachowitz, M.: Redressing the balance: quantifying net intercatchment groundwater flows, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6415–6434, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6415-2018, 2018.
Bouaziz, L. J. E., Fenicia, F., Thirel, G., de Boer-Euser, T., Buitink, J., Brauer, C. C., De Niel, J., Dewals, B. J., Drogue, G., Grelier, B., Melsen, L. A., Moustakas, S., Nossent, J., Pereira, F., Sprokkereef, E., Stam, J., Weerts, A. H., Willems, P., Savenije, H. H. G., and Hrachowitz, M.: Behind the scenes of streamflow model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1069–1095, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1069-2021, 2021.
Brocca, L., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., Wagner, W., and Hasenauer, S.: ASCAT soil wetness index validation through in situ and modeled soil moisture data in central Italy, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 2745–2755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.06.009, 2010.
Capell, R., Tetzlaff, D., and Soulsby, C.: Can time domain and source area tracers reduce uncertainty in rainfall-runoff models in larger heterogeneous catchments?, Water Resour. Res., 48, 2011WR011543, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011543, 2012.
Carluer, N.: Vers une modélisation hydrologique adaptée à l'évaluation des pollutions diffuses: prise en compte du réseau anthropique. Adaptation au bassin versant de Naizin (Morbihan), PhD thesis, Doctorat Sciences de la terre, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, https://hal.inrae.fr/tel-02577946v1 (last access: 19 December 2024), 1998.
Casal, L.: Evaluation de scénarios de gestion paysagère de l'azote par modélisation en bassins versants agricoles, These de doctorat, Rennes, Agrocampus Ouest, https://theses.fr/2018NSARD085 (last access: 19 December 2024), 2018.
Casal, L., Durand, P., Akkal-Corfini, N., Benhamou, C., Laurent, F., Salmon-Monviola, J., and Vertès, F.: Optimal location of set-aside areas to reduce nitrogen pollution: a modelling study, J. Agricult. Sci., 156, 1090–1102, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618001144, 2018.
Casal, L., Durand, P., Akkal-Corfini, N., Benhamou, C., Laurent, F., Salmon-Monviola, J., Ferrant, S., Probst, A., Probst, J.-L., and Vertès, F.: Reduction of stream nitrate concentrations by land management in contrasted landscapes, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 114, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09985-0, 2019.
Clark, M. P., Kavetski, D., and Fenicia, F.: Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling: Hypothesis Testing In Hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 47, W09301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009827, 2011.
Clark, M. P., Schaefli, B., Schymanski, S. J., Samaniego, L., Luce, C. H., Jackson, B. M., Freer, J. E., Arnold, J. R., Moore, R. D., Istanbulluoglu, E., and Ceola, S.: Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 52, 2350–2365, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017910, 2016.
Creed, I. F., McKnight, D. M., Pellerin, B. A., Green, M. B., Bergamaschi, B. A., Aiken, G. R., Burns, D. A., Findlay, S. E. G., Shanley, J. B., Striegl, R. G., Aulenbach, B. T., Clow, D. W., Laudon, H., McGlynn, B. L., McGuire, K. J., Smith, R. A., and Stackpoole, S. M.: The river as a chemostat: fresh perspectives on dissolved organic matter flowing down the river continuum, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 72, 1272–1285, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0400, 2015.
Criss, R. E. and Winston, W. E.: Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2723–2725, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7072, 2008.
Dalzell, B. J., Filley, T. R., and Harbor, J. M.: The role of hydrology in annual organic carbon loads and terrestrial organic matter export from a midwestern agricultural watershed, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 1448–1462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.12.009, 2007.
Delannoy, D., Maury, O., and Décome, J.: CLIMATIK: système d'information pour les données du réseau agroclimatique INRAE, V1, Recherche Data Gouv [data set], https://doi.org/10.57745/AJNXEN, 2022.
Demirel, M. C., Mai, J., Mendiguren, G., Koch, J., Samaniego, L., and Stisen, S.: Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018, 2018.
Di Grazia, F., Garcia, X., Acuña, V., Llanos-Paez, O., Galgani, L., Gumiero, B., and Loiselle, S. A.: Modeling dissolved and particulate organic carbon dynamics at basin and sub-basin scales, Sci. Total Environ., 884, 163840, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163840, 2023.
Dimitrova-Petrova, K., Geris, J., Wilkinson, M. E., Rosolem, R., Verrot, L., Lilly, A., and Soulsby, C.: Opportunities and challenges in using catchment-scale storage estimates from cosmic ray neutron sensors for rainfall-runoff modelling, J. Hydrol., 586, 124878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124878, 2020.
Duethmann, D., Smith, A., Soulsby, C., Kleine, L., Wagner, W., Hahn, S., and Tetzlaff, D.: Evaluating satellite-derived soil moisture data for improving the internal consistency of process-based ecohydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 614, 128462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128462, 2022.
Dupas, R., Ehrhardt, S., Musolff, A., Fovet, O., and Durand, P.: Long-term nitrogen retention and transit time distribution in agricultural catchments in western France, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 115011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbe47, 2020.
Eder, A., Weigelhofer, G., Pucher, M., Tiefenbacher, A., Strauss, P., Brandl, M., and Blöschl, G.: Pathways and composition of dissolved organic carbon in a small agricultural catchment during base flow conditions, Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 22, 96–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2021.07.012, 2022.
Efstratiadis, A. and Koutsoyiannis, D.: Fitting Hydrological Models on Multiple Responses Using the Multiobjective Evolutionary Annealing-Simplex Approach, in: Practical Hydroinformatics: Computational Intelligence and Technological Developments in Water Applications, edited by: Abrahart, R. J., See, L. M., and Solomatine, D. P., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 259–273, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_19, 2008.
Efstratiadis, A. and Koutsoyiannis, D.: One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 58–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660903526292, 2010.
Euser, T., Winsemius, H. C., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., Uhlenbrook, S., and Savenije, H. H. G.: A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1893–1912, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013, 2013.
Euser, T., Hrachowitz, M., Winsemius, H. C., and Savenije, H. H. G.: The effect of forcing and landscape distribution on performance and consistency of model structures: Distribution Of Forcing And Model Structures, Hydrol. Process., 29, 3727–3743, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10445, 2015.
Fenicia, F., Savenije, H. H. G., Matgen, P., and Pfister, L.: Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement: Catchment Behavior Through Stepwise Model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005563, 2008.
Fenicia, F., Kavetski, D., Reichert, P., and Albert, C.: Signature-Domain Calibration of Hydrological Models Using Approximate Bayesian Computation: Empirical Analysis of Fundamental Properties, Water Resour. Res., 54, 3958–3987, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021616, 2018.
Fovet, O., Ruiz, L., Hrachowitz, M., Faucheux, M., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: Hydrological hysteresis and its value for assessing process consistency in catchment conceptual models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 105–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-105-2015, 2015a.
Fovet, O., Ruiz, L., Faucheux, M., Molénat, J., Sekhar, M., Vertès, F., Aquilina, L., Gascuel-Odoux, C., and Durand, P.: Using long time series of agricultural-derived nitrates for estimating catchment transit times, J. Hydrol., 522, 603–617, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.030, 2015b.
Fovet, O., Ruiz, L., Gruau, G., Akkal, N., Aquilina, L., Busnot, S., Dupas, R., Durand, P., Faucheux, M., Fauvel, Y., Fléchard, C., Gilliet, N., Grimaldi, C., Hamon, Y., Jaffrezic, A., Jeanneau, L., Labasque, T., Le Henaff, G., Mérot, P., Molénat, J., Petitjean, P., Pierson-Wickmann, A., Squividant, H., Viaud, V., Walter, C., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: AgrHyS: An Observatory of Response Times in Agro-Hydro Systems, Vadose Zone J., 17, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.04.0066 2018.
Fovet, O., Cooper, D. M., Jones, D. L., Jones, T. G., and Evans, C. D.: Dynamics of dissolved organic matter in headwaters: comparison of headwater streams with contrasting DOM and nutrient composition, Aquat. Sci., 82, 29, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-0704-6, 2020.
Franks, S. W., Gineste, P., Beven, K. J., and Merot, P.: On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: The incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process, Water Resour. Res., 34, 787–797, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR03041, 1998.
Freer, J. E., McMillan, H., McDonnell, J. J., and Beven, K. J.: Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures, J. Hydrol., 291, 254–277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.037, 2004.
Gao, H., Ding, Y., Zhao, Q., Hrachowitz, M., and Savenije, H. H. G.: The importance of aspect for modelling the hydrological response in a glacier catchment in Central Asia, Hydrol. Process., 31, 2842–2859, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11224, 2017.
Gharari, S., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., Gao, H., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Using expert knowledge to increase realism in environmental system models can dramatically reduce the need for calibration, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4839–4859, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4839-2014, 2014.
Giustolisi, O. and Simeone, V.: Optimal design of artificial neural networks by a multi-objective strategy: groundwater level predictions, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 51, 502–523, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.3.502, 2006.
Godsey, S. E., Kirchner, J. W., and Clow, D. W.: Concentration–discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US catchments, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1844–1864, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7315, 2009.
Gomis-Cebolla, J., Garcia-Arias, A., Perpinyà-Vallès, M., and Francés, F.: Evaluation of Sentinel-1, SMAP and SMOS surface soil moisture products for distributed eco-hydrological modelling in Mediterranean forest basins, J. Hydrol., 608, 127569, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127569, 2022.
Guillaume, J. H. A., Jakeman, J. D., Marsili-Libelli, S., Asher, M., Brunner, P., Croke, B., Hill, M. C., Jakeman, A. J., Keesman, K. J., Razavi, S., and Stigter, J. D.: Introductory overview of identifiability analysis: A guide to evaluating whether you have the right type of data for your modeling purpose, Environ. Model. Softw., 119, 418–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.07.007, 2019.
Güntner, A., Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J., and Leibundgut, C.: Multi-criterial validation of TOPMODEL in a mountainous catchment, Hydrol. Process., 13, 1603–1620, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990815)13:11<1603::AID-HYP830>3.0.CO;2-K, 1999.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., and Ye, M.: Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy: Assessment Of Model Structural Adequacy, Water Resour. Res., 48, W08301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011044, 2012.
Hartmann, A., Wagener, T., Rimmer, A., Lange, J., Brielmann, H., and Weiler, M.: Testing the realism of model structures to identify karst system processes using water quality and quantity signatures: Karst System Identification, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3345–3358, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20229, 2013.
Hartmann, G. and Bárdossy, A.: Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration, Adv. Geosci., 5, 83–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-83-2005, 2005.
Heinen, M.: Simplified denitrification models: Overview and properties, Geoderma, 133, 444–463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.06.010, 2006.
Houska, T., Kraft, P., Chamorro-Chavez, A., and Breuer, L.: SPOTting Model Parameters Using a Ready-Made Python Package, PLoS ONE, 10, e0145180, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145180, 2015.
Hrachowitz, M. and Clark, M. P.: HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3953–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017, 2017.
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H., Bogaard, T. A., Tetzlaff, D., and Soulsby, C.: What can flux tracking teach us about water age distribution patterns and their temporal dynamics?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 533–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-533-2013, 2013.
Hrachowitz, M., Fovet, O., Ruiz, L., Euser, T., Gharari, S., Nijzink, R., Freer, J., Savenije, H. H. G., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: Process consistency in models: The importance of system signatures, expert knowledge, and process complexity, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7445–7469, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015484, 2014.
Hrachowitz, M., Fovet, O., Ruiz, L., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Transit time distributions, legacy contamination and variability in biogeochemical
Hrachowitz, M., Benettin, P., van Breukelen, B. M., Fovet, O., Howden, N. J. K., Ruiz, L., van der Velde, Y., and Wade, A. J.: Transit times-the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale: Linking hydrology and transit times, WIREs Water, 3, 629–657, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1155, 2016.
Hrachowitz, M., Stockinger, M., Coenders-Gerrits, M., van der Ent, R., Bogena, H., Lücke, A., and Stumpp, C.: Reduction of vegetation-accessible water storage capacity after deforestation affects catchment travel time distributions and increases young water fractions in a headwater catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4887–4915, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, 2021.
Huang, Y. and Bardossy, A.: Impacts of Data Quantity and Quality on Model Calibration: Implications for Model Parameterization in Data-Scarce Catchments, Water, 12, 2352, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092352, 2020.
Hulsman, P., Winsemius, H. C., Michailovsky, C. I., Savenije, H. H. G., and Hrachowitz, M.: Using altimetry observations combined with GRACE to select parameter sets of a hydrological model in a data-scarce region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3331–3359, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3331-2020, 2020.
Humbert, G., Jaffrezic, A., Fovet, O., Gruau, G., and Durand, P.: Dry-season length and runoff control annual variability in stream DOC dynamics in a small, shallow groundwater-dominated agricultural watershed, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7860–7877, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017336, 2015.
Inamdar, S. P. and Mitchell, M. J.: Hydrologic and topographic controls on storm-event exports of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrate across catchment scales, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004212, 2006.
INRAE-AgrHyS: AgrHyS Observatory, https://agrhys.rennes.hub.inrae.fr/ (last access: 23 December 2024), 2024.
ISO 10304: Water Quality – Determination of Dissolved Anions by Liquid Chromatography of Ions – Part 1: Determination of Bromide, Chloride, Fluoride, Nitrate, Nitrite, Phosphate and Sulfate, 15 pp., https://www.iso.org/standard/46004.html (last access: 19 December 2024), 2007.
Jothityangkoon, C., Sivapalan, M., and Farmer, D. L.: Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development, J. Hydrol., 254, 174–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00496-6, 2001.
Kalbitz, K. and Kaiser, K.: Contribution of dissolved organic matter to carbon storage in forest mineral soils, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 171, 52–60, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200700043, 2008.
Kavetski, D., Fenicia, F., Reichert, P., and Albert, C.: Signature-Domain Calibration of Hydrological Models Using Approximate Bayesian Computation: Theory and Comparison to Existing Applications, Water Resour. Res., 54, 4059–4083, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020528, 2018.
Kirchner, J. W.: Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology: Getting The Right Answers For The Right Reasons, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004362, 2006.
Kirchner, J. W., Feng, X., and Neal, C.: Catchment-scale advection and dispersion as a mechanism for fractal scaling in stream tracer concentrations, J. Hydrol., 254, 82–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00487-5, 2001.
Kirchner, J. W., Tetzlaff, D., and Soulsby, C.: Comparing chloride and water isotopes as hydrological tracers in two Scottish catchments, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1631–1645, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7676, 2010.
Knapp, J. L. A., von Freyberg, J., Studer, B., Kiewiet, L., and Kirchner, J. W.: Concentration–discharge relationships vary among hydrological events, reflecting differences in event characteristics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2561–2576, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2561-2020, 2020.
Koch, J. C., Runkel, R. L., Striegl, R., and McKnight, D. M.: Hydrologic controls on the transport and cycling of carbon and nitrogen in a boreal catchment underlain by continuous permafrost, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 698–712, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20058, 2013.
Köhler, S., Buffam, I., Jonsson, A., and Bishop, K.: Photochemical and microbial processing of stream and soil water dissolved organic matter in a boreal forested catchment in northern Sweden, Aquat. Sci., 64, 269–281, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-002-8071-z, 2002.
Kreye, P., Gelleszun, M., and Meon, G.: Parameter identification in hydrological models using groundwater-level measurements and satellite-based soil moisture, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 64, 633–652, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1599120, 2019.
Kunnath-Poovakka, A., Ryu, D., Renzullo, L. J., and George, B.: The efficacy of calibrating hydrologic model using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and soil moisture for streamflow prediction, J. Hydrol., 535, 509–524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.018, 2016.
Kuppel, S., Tetzlaff, D., Maneta, M. P., and Soulsby, C.: EcH2O-iso 1.0: water isotopes and age tracking in a process-based, distributed ecohydrological model, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3045–3069, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3045-2018, 2018a.
Kuppel, S., Tetzlaff, D., Maneta, M. P., and Soulsby, C.: What can we learn from multi-data calibration of a process-based ecohydrological model?, Environ. Model. Softw., 101, 301–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.001, 2018b.
Lambert, T., Pierson-Wickmann, A.-C., Gruau, G., Jaffrezic, A., Petitjean, P., Thibault, J.-N., and Jeanneau, L.: Hydrologically driven seasonal changes in the sources and production mechanisms of dissolved organic carbon in a small lowland catchment, Water Resour. Res., 49, 5792–5803, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20466, 2013.
Lambert, T., Pierson-Wickmann, A.-C., Gruau, G., Jaffrezic, A., Petitjean, P., Thibault, J. N., and Jeanneau, L.: DOC sources and DOC transport pathways in a small headwater catchment as revealed by carbon isotope fluctuation during storm events, Biogeosciences, 11, 3043–3056, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3043-2014, 2014.
Lan, T., Lin, K., Xu, C.-Y., Tan, X., and Chen, X.: Dynamics of hydrological-model parameters: mechanisms, problems and solutions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1347–1366, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1347-2020, 2020.
Le Moine, N., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Michel, C.: How can rainfall-runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study based on 1040 French catchments, Water Resour. Res., 43, W06428, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005608, 2007.
López López, P., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Schellekens, J., Sterk, G., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Calibration of a large-scale hydrological model using satellite-based soil moisture and evapotranspiration products, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3125–3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3125-2017, 2017.
Matos-Moreira, M., Lemercier, B., Dupas, R., Michot, D., Viaud, V., Akkal-Corfini, N., Louis, B., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: High-resolution mapping of soil phosphorus concentration in agricultural landscapes with readily available or detailed survey data, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 68, 281–294, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12420, 2017.
McMillan, H., Tetzlaff, D., Clark, M., and Soulsby, C.: Do time-variable tracers aid the evaluation of hydrological model structure? A multimodel approach, Water Resour. Res., 48, W05501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011688, 2012.
Medici, C., Wade, A. J., and Francés, F.: Does increased hydrochemical model complexity decrease robustness?, J. Hydrol., 440–441, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.047, 2012.
Minville, M., Cartier, D., Guay, C., Leclaire, L.-A., Audet, C., Le Digabel, S., and Merleau, J.: Improving process representation in conceptual hydrological model calibration using climate simulations, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5044–5073, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013857, 2014.
Moazenzadeh, R. and Izady, A.: A hybrid calibration method for improving hydrological systems using ground-based and remotely-sensed observations, J. Hydrol., 615, 128688, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128688, 2022.
Molenat, J., Gascuel, C., Davy, P., and Durand, P.: How to model shallow water-table depth variations: the case of the Kervidy-Naizin catchment – France, Hydrol. Process., 19, 901–920, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5546, 2005.
Molenat, J., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Ruiz, L., and Gruau, G.: Role of water table dynamics on stream nitrate export and concentration in agricultural headwater catchment (France), J. Hydrol., 348, 363–378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.005, 2008.
Monteil, C., Zaoui, F., Le Moine, N., and Hendrickx, F.: Multi-objective calibration by combination of stochastic and gradient-like parameter generation rules – the caRamel algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3189–3209, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3189-2020, 2020.
Morel, B., Durand, P., Jaffrezic, A., Gruau, G., and Molenat, J.: Sources of dissolved organic carbon during stormflow in a headwater agricultural catchment, Hydrol. Process., 23, 2888–2901, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7379, 2009.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, T. ASABE, 50, 885–900, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153, 2007.
Mostafaie, A., Forootan, E., Safari, A., and Schumacher, M.: Comparing multi-objective optimization techniques to calibrate a conceptual hydrological model using in situ runoff and daily GRACE data, Comput. Geosci., 22, 789–814, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9726-8, 2018.
Moussa, R., Chahinian, N., and Bocquillon, C.: Distributed hydrological modelling of a Mediterranean mountainous catchment – Model construction and multi-site validation, J. Hydrol., 337, 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.028, 2007.
Musolff, A., Fleckenstein, J. H., Rao, P. S. C., and Jawitz, J. W.: Emergent archetype patterns of coupled hydrologic and biogeochemical responses in catchments: Emergence of Archetype C–Q Patterns, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 4143–4151, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072630, 2017.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Nijzink, R. C., Almeida, S., Pechlivanidis, I. G., Capell, R., Gustafssons, D., Arheimer, B., Parajka, J., Freer, J., Han, D., Wagener, T., van Nooijen, R. R. P., Savenije, H. H. G., and Hrachowitz, M.: Constraining Conceptual Hydrological Models With Multiple Information Sources, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8332–8362, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021895, 2018.
Nossent, J., Elsen, P., and Bauwens, W.: Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1515–1525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010, 2011.
OZCAR: AgrHys Observatory, https://www.ozcar-ri.org/agrhys-observatory/ (last access: 23 December 2024), 2024.
Pelletier, A. and Andréassian, V.: On constraining a lumped hydrological model with both piezometry and streamflow: results of a large sample evaluation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2733–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, 2022.
Penman, H. L.: Estimating evaporation, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 37, 43–50, https://doi.org/10.1029/TR037i001p00043, 1956.
Pesántez, J., Birkel, C., Mosquera, G. M., Célleri, R., Contreras, P., Cárdenas, I., and Crespo, P.: Bridging the gap from hydrological to biogeochemical processes using tracer-aided hydrological models in a tropical montane ecosystem, J. Hydrol., 619, 129328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129328, 2023.
Pettersson, A., Arheimer, B., and Johansson, B.: Nitrogen Concentrations Simulated with HBV-N: New Response Function and Calibration Strategy, Hydrol. Res., 32, 227–248, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2001.0014, 2001.
Piovano, T. I., Tetzlaff, D., Carey, S. K., Shatilla, N. J., Smith, A., and Soulsby, C.: Spatially distributed tracer-aided runoff modelling and dynamics of storage and water ages in a permafrost-influenced catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2507–2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2507-2019, 2019.
Rajat and Athira, P.: Calibration of hydrological models considering process interdependence: A case study of SWAT model, Environ. Model. Softw., 144, 105131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105131, 2021.
Rajib, M. A., Merwade, V., and Yu, Z.: Multi-objective calibration of a hydrologic model using spatially distributed remotely sensed/in-situ soil moisture, J. Hydrol., 536, 192–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.037, 2016.
Rakovec, O., Kumar, R., Mai, J., Cuntz, M., Thober, S., Zink, M., Attinger, S., Schäfer, D., Schrön, M., and Samaniego, L.: Multiscale and Multivariate Evaluation of Water Fluxes and States over European River Basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 287–307, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0054.1, 2016.
Raymond, P. A. and Saiers, J. E.: Event controlled DOC export from forested watersheds, Biogeochemistry, 100, 197–209, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9416-7, 2010.
Reed, P. and Devireddy, V.: Groundwater monitoring design: a case study combining epsilon dominance archiving and automatic parameterization for the nsga-ii, in: Applications of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms, Volume 1, World Scientific, 79–100, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812567796_0004, 2004.
Reusser, D. E., Buytaert, W., and Zehe, E.: Temporal dynamics of model parameter sensitivity for computationally expensive models with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test: Temporal Dynamics Of Model Parameter Sensitivity, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07551, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009947, 2011.
Riboust, P., Thirel, G., Moine, N. L., and Ribstein, P.: Revisiting a Simple Degree-Day Model for Integrating Satellite Data: Implementation of Swe-Sca Hystereses, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 67, 70–81, https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2018-0004, 2019.
Rinaldo, A., Benettin, P., Harman, C. J., Hrachowitz, M., McGuire, K. J., van der Velde, Y., Bertuzzo, E., and Botter, G.: Storage selection functions: A coherent framework for quantifying how catchments store and release water and solutes: On Storage Selection Functions, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4840–4847, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017273, 2015.
Salmon-Monviola, J., Moreau, P., Benhamou, C., Durand, P., Merot, P., Oehler, F., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: Effect of climate change and increased atmospheric CO2 on hydrological and nitrogen cycling in an intensive agricultural headwater catchment in western France, Climatic Change, 120, 433–447, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0828-y, 2013.
Salmon-Monviola, J., Fovet, O., and Hrachowitz, M.: Modeling water, and nitrate and dissolved organic carbon concentrations dynamics in an agricultural headwater catchment, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10161243, 2023.
Saltelli, A.: Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, Comput. Phys. Commun., 145, 280–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00280-1, 2002.
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M.: Sensitivity Analysis, 504 pp., ISBN 978-0-470-74382-9, https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Sensitivity+Analysis-p-9780470743829 (last access: 19 December 2024), 2009.
Saltelli, A. and Annoni, P.: How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis, Environ. Model. Softw., 25, 1508–1517, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.012, 2010.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Chan, K. P.-S.: A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, Technometrics, 41, 39–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594, 1999.
Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., and Carrillo, G.: Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2895–2911, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011, 2011.
Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 215–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000, 2000.
Seibert, J., Rodhe, A., and Bishop, K.: Simulating interactions between saturated and unsaturated storage in a conceptual runoff model, Hydrol. Process., 17, 379–390, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1130, 2003.
Seibert, J., Grabs, T., Köhler, S., Laudon, H., Winterdahl, M., and Bishop, K.: Linking soil- and stream-water chemistry based on a Riparian Flow-Concentration Integration Model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2287–2297, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2287-2009, 2009.
Shah, S., Duan, Z., Song, X., Li, R., Mao, H., Liu, J., Ma, T., and Wang, M.: Evaluating the added value of multi-variable calibration of SWAT with remotely sensed evapotranspiration data for improving hydrological modeling, J. Hydrol., 603, 127046, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127046, 2021.
Shang, P., Lu, Y., Du, Y., Jaffé, R., Findlay, R. H., and Wynn, A.: Climatic and watershed controls of dissolved organic matter variation in streams across a gradient of agricultural land use, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 1442–1453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.322, 2018.
Shin, M.-J. and Kim, C.-S.: Assessment of the suitability of rainfall–runoff models by coupling performance statistics and sensitivity analysis, Hydrol. Res., 48, 1192–1213, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.129, 2017.
Silvestro, F., Gabellani, S., Rudari, R., Delogu, F., Laiolo, P., and Boni, G.: Uncertainty reduction and parameter estimation of a distributed hydrological model with ground and remote-sensing data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1727–1751, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1727-2015, 2015.
Song, X., Zhang, J., Zhan, C., Xuan, Y., Ye, M., and Xu, C.: Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications, J. Hydrol., 523, 739–757, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.013, 2015.
Sorel, L., Viaud, V., Durand, P., and Walter, C.: Modeling spatio-temporal crop allocation patterns by a stochastic decision tree method, considering agronomic driving factors, Agricult. Syst., 103, 647–655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.003, 2010.
Stadnyk, T. A. and Holmes, T. L.: Large scale hydrologic and tracer aided modelling: A review, J. Hydrol., 618, 129177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129177, 2023.
Strohmenger, L., Fovet, O., Akkal-Corfini, N., Dupas, R., Durand, P., Faucheux, M., Gruau, G., Hamon, Y., Jaffrezic, A., Minaudo, C., Petitjean, P., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: Multitemporal Relationships Between the Hydroclimate and Exports of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in a Small Agricultural Watershed, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026323, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026323, 2020.
Strohmenger, L., Fovet, O., Hrachowitz, M., Salmon-Monviola, J., and Gascuel-Odoux, C.: Is a simple model based on two mixing reservoirs able to reproduce the intra-annual dynamics of DOC and NO3 stream concentrations in an agricultural headwater catchment?, Sci. Total Environ., 794, 148715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148715, 2021.
Sun, X., Croke, B., Jakeman, A., and Roberts, S.: Benchmarking Active Subspace methods of global sensitivity analysis against variance-based Sobol' and Morris methods with established test functions, Environ. Model. Softw., 149, 105310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105310, 2022.
Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, L. P. H., de Jong, S. M., van Geer, F. C., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Calibrating a large-extent high-resolution coupled groundwater-land surface model using soil moisture and discharge data: Calibrating Groundwater-Land Surface Model, Water Resour. Res., 50, 687–705, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013807, 2014.
Taylor, P. G. and Townsend, A. R.: Stoichiometric control of organic carbon–nitrate relationships from soils to the sea, Nature, 464, 1178–1181, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08985, 2010.
Thomas, Z., Abbott, B. W., Troccaz, O., Baudry, J., and Pinay, G.: Proximate and ultimate controls on carbon and nutrient dynamics of small agricultural catchments, Biogeosciences, 13, 1863–1875, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1863-2016, 2016.
Tong, R., Parajka, J., Salentinig, A., Pfeil, I., Komma, J., Széles, B., Kubáò, M., Valent, P., Vreugdenhil, M., Wagner, W., and Blöschl, G.: The value of ASCAT soil moisture and MODIS snow cover data for calibrating a conceptual hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1389–1410, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1389-2021, 2021.
Viaud, V., Santillàn-Carvantes, P., Akkal-Corfini, N., Le Guillou, C., Prévost-Bouré, N. C., Ranjard, L., and Menasseri-Aubry, S.: Landscape-scale analysis of cropping system effects on soil quality in a context of crop-livestock farming, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 265, 166–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.018, 2018.
Wang, A. and Solomatine, D. P.: Practical Experience of Sensitivity Analysis: Comparing Six Methods, on Three Hydrological Models, with Three Performance Criteria, Water, 11, 1062, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051062, 2019.
Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Sun, G., Strauss, P., Guo, J., Tang, Y., and Yao, A.: Multi-site calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE SHE Model for a large watershed in northern China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4621–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4621-2012, 2012.
Werth, S. and Güntner, A.: Calibration analysis for water storage variability of the global hydrological model WGHM, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 59–78, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-59-2010, 2010.
Winter, C., Lutz, S. R., Musolff, A., Kumar, R., Weber, M., and Fleckenstein, J. H.: Disentangling the Impact of Catchment Heterogeneity on Nitrate Export Dynamics From Event to Long-Term Time Scales, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR027992, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027992, 2021.
Woodward, S. J. R., Stenger, R., and Bidwell, V. J.: Dynamic analysis of stream flow and water chemistry to infer subsurface water and nitrate fluxes in a lowland dairying catchment, J. Hydrol., 505, 299–311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.07.044, 2013.
Woodward, S. J. R., Wöhling, T., Rode, M., and Stenger, R.: Predicting nitrate discharge dynamics in mesoscale catchments using the lumped StreamGEM model and Bayesian parameter inference, J. Hydrology, 552, 684–703, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.021, 2017.
WRB: World reference base for soil resources, World soil resources reports, 103, 1–128, https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/images/resources/pdf_documents/wrb2007_red.pdf (last access: 19 December 2024), 2006.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H.: Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1756–1774, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.01.005, 2007.
Yang, H., Choi, H., and Lim, H.: Applicability Assessment of Estimation Methods for Baseflow Recession Constants in Small Forest Catchments, Water, 10, 1074, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081074, 2018.
Yassin, F., Razavi, S., Wheater, H., Sapriza-Azuri, G., Davison, B., and Pietroniro, A.: Enhanced identification of a hydrologic model using streamflow and satellite water storage data: A multicriteria sensitivity analysis and optimization approach, Hydrol. Process., 31, 3320–3333, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11267, 2017.
Yen, H., Bailey, R. T., Arabi, M., Ahmadi, M., White, M. J., and Arnold, J. G.: The Role of Interior Watershed Processes in Improving Parameter Estimation and Performance of Watershed Models, J. Environ. Qual., 43, 1601–1613, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.03.0110, 2014.
Yeste, P., Melsen, L. A., García-Valdecasas Ojeda, M., Gámiz-Fortis, S. R., Castro-Díez, Y., and Esteban-Parra, M. J.: A Pareto-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Multiobjective Calibration Approach for Integrating Streamflow and Evaporation Data, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR033235, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033235, 2023.
Short summary
To increase the predictive power of hydrological models, it is necessary to improve their consistency, i.e. their physical realism, which is measured by the ability of the model to reproduce observed system dynamics. Using a model to represent the dynamics of water and nitrate and dissolved organic carbon concentrations in an agricultural catchment, we showed that using solute-concentration data for calibration is useful to improve the hydrological consistency of the model.
To increase the predictive power of hydrological models, it is necessary to improve their...
