Articles | Volume 28, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hydro-pedotransfer functions: a roadmap for future development
Tobias Karl David Weber
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Soil Science Section, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
Lutz Weihermüller
Institute Agrosphere IBG-3, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany
Attila Nemes
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
Division of Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway
Michel Bechtold
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Aurore Degré
TERRA, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, ULiège, Liège, Belgium
Efstathios Diamantopoulos
Chair of Soil Physics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
Simone Fatichi
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Vilim Filipović
Division for Agroecology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Future Regions Research Centre, Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering Research Group, Federation University, Gippsland, VIC 3841, Australia
Surya Gupta
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
Tobias L. Hohenbrink
Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Daniel R. Hirmas
Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
Conrad Jackisch
Interdisciplinary Environmental Research Centre, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany
Quirijn de Jong van Lier
CENA/University of São Paulo, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil
John Koestel
Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Soil Quality and Soil Use, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
Peter Lehmann
Physics of Soils and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Toby R. Marthews
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), Maclean Building, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
Budiman Minasny
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Holger Pagel
Soil Systems Modeling, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany
Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Martine van der Ploeg
Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Dept. Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh
Soil Science Section, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
Simon Fiil Svane
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Brigitta Szabó
Institute for Soil Sciences, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Herman Ottó út 15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Harry Vereecken
Institute Agrosphere IBG-3, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany
Anne Verhoef
Department of Geography and Environmental Science, The University of Reading, Reading, UK
Michael Young
Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Yijian Zeng
Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, the Netherlands
Yonggen Zhang
Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Sara Bonetti
Laboratory of Catchment Hydrology and Geomorphology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, Switzerland
Related authors
Wolfgang Aumer, Morten Möller, Carolyn-Monika Görres, Christian Eckhardt, Tobias Karl David Weber, Carolina Bilibio, Christian Bruns, Andreas Gattinger, Maria Renate Finckh, and Claudia Kammann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2862, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2862, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Arable soils emit or absorb greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane. This study compared two gas analysis techniques for determining greenhouse gas fluxes under field conditions using the closed chamber method. Fluxes were measured simultaneously using the widely applied gas chromatography (GC) and the emerging mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS) technique. Our results showed that LAS is a reliable alternative to GC, particularly for low flux rates.
Benjamin Guillaume, Hanane Aroui Boukbida, Gerben Bakker, Andrzej Bieganowski, Yves Brostaux, Wim Cornelis, Wolfgang Durner, Christian Hartmann, Bo V. Iversen, Mathieu Javaux, Joachim Ingwersen, Krzysztof Lamorski, Axel Lamparter, András Makó, Ana María Mingot Soriano, Ingmar Messing, Attila Nemes, Alexandre Pomes-Bordedebat, Martine van der Ploeg, Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Joost Wellens, and Aurore Degré
SOIL, 9, 365–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of soil water retention properties play an important role in a variety of societal issues that depend on soil water conditions. However, there is little concern about the consistency of these measurements between laboratories. We conducted an interlaboratory comparison to assess the reproducibility of the measurement of the soil water retention curve. Results highlight the need to harmonize and standardize procedures to improve the description of unsaturated processes in soils.
Florian Späth, Verena Rajtschan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Shehan Morandage, Diego Lange, Syed Saqlain Abbas, Andreas Behrendt, Joachim Ingwersen, Thilo Streck, and Volker Wulfmeyer
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 25–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Important topics in land–atmosphere feedback research are water and energy balances and heterogeneities of fluxes at the land surface and in the atmosphere. To target these questions, the Land–Atmosphere Feedback Observatory (LAFO) has been installed in Germany. The instrumentation allows for comprehensive measurements from the bedrock to the troposphere. The LAFO observation strategy aims for simultaneous measurements in all three compartments: atmosphere, soil and land surface, and vegetation.
Michelle Viswanathan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Sebastian Gayler, Juliane Mai, and Thilo Streck
Biogeosciences, 19, 2187–2209, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2187-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2187-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We analysed the evolution of model parameter uncertainty and prediction error as we updated parameters of a maize phenology model based on yearly observations, by sequentially applying Bayesian calibration. Although parameter uncertainty was reduced, prediction quality deteriorated when calibration and prediction data were from different maize ripening groups or temperature conditions. The study highlights that Bayesian methods should account for model limitations and inherent data structures.
Tobias K. D. Weber, Joachim Ingwersen, Petra Högy, Arne Poyda, Hans-Dieter Wizemann, Michael Scott Demyan, Kristina Bohm, Ravshan Eshonkulov, Sebastian Gayler, Pascal Kremer, Moritz Laub, Yvonne Funkiun Nkwain, Christian Troost, Irene Witte, Tim Reichenau, Thomas Berger, Georg Cadisch, Torsten Müller, Andreas Fangmeier, Volker Wulfmeyer, and Thilo Streck
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1153–1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Presented are measurement results from six agricultural fields operated by local farmers in southwestern Germany over 9 years. Six eddy-covariance stations measuring water, energy, and carbon fluxes between the vegetated soil surface and the atmosphere provided the backbone of the measurement sites and were supplemented by extensive soil and vegetation state monitoring. The dataset is ideal for testing process models characterizing fluxes at the vegetated soil surface and in the atmosphere.
Brigitta Szabó, Melanie Weynants, and Tobias K. D. Weber
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 151–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents updated European prediction algorithms (euptf2) to compute soil hydraulic parameters from easily available soil properties. The new algorithms lead to significantly better predictions and provide a built-in prediction uncertainty computation. The influence of predictor variables on predicted soil hydraulic properties is explored and practical guidance on how to use the derived PTFs is provided. A website and an R package facilitate easy application of the updated predictions.
Shiao Feng, Wenhong Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Zhongwang Wei, Jianzhi Dong, Lutz Weihermüller, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-410, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-410, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Soil moisture is key for weather, farming, and ecosystems, but global datasets have gaps and biases. We compared three products against 1,615 stations with more than 1.9 million measured moisture, finding ERA5-Land highly correlated but biased high, and SMAP-L4 accurate but short-term. Fusing them created an enhanced dataset, improving correlation by 5%, reducing errors by 20%, and enhancing overall fit by 15%. This seamless resource aids drought tracking, water planning, and climate adaptation.
Jordan Bates, Carsten Montzka, Harry Vereecken, and François Jonard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3919, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with advanced cameras and laser scanning to measure crop water use and detect early signs of plant stress. By combining 3D views of crop structure with surface temperature and reflectance data, we improved estimates of water loss, especially in dense crops like wheat. This approach can help farmers use water more efficiently, respond quickly to stress, and support sustainable agriculture in a changing climate.
Wolfgang Aumer, Morten Möller, Carolyn-Monika Görres, Christian Eckhardt, Tobias Karl David Weber, Carolina Bilibio, Christian Bruns, Andreas Gattinger, Maria Renate Finckh, and Claudia Kammann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2862, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2862, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Arable soils emit or absorb greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane. This study compared two gas analysis techniques for determining greenhouse gas fluxes under field conditions using the closed chamber method. Fluxes were measured simultaneously using the widely applied gas chromatography (GC) and the emerging mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS) technique. Our results showed that LAS is a reliable alternative to GC, particularly for low flux rates.
Yin-Chung Huang, José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, and Alex B. McBratney
SOIL, 11, 553–563, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-553-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-553-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainty quantification plays a crucial role in reporting machine learning models in soil spectroscopy. This study introduces Monte Carlo conformal prediction (MC-CP), a novel method for uncertainty quantification in deep-learning soil spectral models. MC-CP outperformed two established methods, providing the most reliable results. Its efficiency and robustness make it a practical choice for implementing soil spectral models in decision making.
Yue Zhu, Paolo Burlando, Puay Yok Tan, Christian Geiß, and Simone Fatichi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2271–2286, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2271-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2271-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the challenge of accurately predicting floods in regions with limited terrain data. By utilising a deep learning model, we developed a method that improves the resolution of digital elevation data by fusing low-resolution elevation data with high-resolution satellite imagery. This approach not only substantially enhances flood prediction accuracy, but also holds potential for broader applications in simulating natural hazards that require terrain information.
Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2550, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2550, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study estimates irrigation in the Po Valley using AquaCrop and Noah-MP models with sprinkler irrigation. Noah-MP shows higher annual rates than AquaCrop due to more water losses. After adjusting, both align with reported irrigation ranges (500–600 mm/yr). Soil moisture estimates from both models match satellite data, though both have limitations in vegetation and evapotranspiration modeling. The study emphasizes the need for observations to improve irrigation estimates.
Tomislav Hengl, Davide Consoli, Xuemeng Tian, Travis W. Nauman, Madlene Nussbaum, Mustafa Serkan Isik, Leandro Parente, Yu-Feng Ho, Rolf Simoes, Surya Gupta, Alessandro Samuel-Rosa, Taciara Zborowski Horst, José Lucas Safanelli, and Nancy Harris
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-336, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-336, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We used satellite data and thousands of soil samples to create detailed global maps showing how soil changes over time. These maps reveal important patterns in soil health, such as a significant global loss of soil carbon in the past 25 years. Our results help track land degradation and support better land restoration efforts. This work provides a new global tool for understanding and protecting soil, a key resource for food, water, and climate.
Shanti Shwarup Mahto, Simone Fatichi, and Stefano Galelli
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2693–2712, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2693-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2693-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The MSEA-Res database offers an open-access dataset tracking absolute water storage for 186 large reservoirs across Mainland Southeast Asia from 1985 to 2023. It provides valuable insights into how reservoir storage grew by 130 % between 2008 and 2017, driven by dams in key river basins. Our data also reveal how droughts, like the 2019–2020 event, significantly impacted water reservoirs. This resource can aid water management, drought planning, and research globally.
Heye Reemt Bogena, Frank Herrmann, Andreas Lücke, Thomas Pütz, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-185, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-185, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Wüstebach catchment in Germany’s TERENO network underwent partial deforestation in 2013 to support natural regrowth in Eifel National Park. This data paper presents 16 years (2010–2024) of estimated hourly stream-water flux data for nine macro- and micronutrients, dissolved ionic aluminum, and dissolved organic carbon, along with measured solute concentrations and discharge rates from two stations—one affected by clear-cutting and one unaffected.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, and Matthieu Lengaigne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Devon Dunmire, Michel Bechtold, Lucas Boeykens, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2306, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Snow is vital for society and the climate, yet estimates of snowpack remain uncertain due to observational and modeling limitations. Data assimilation (DA) helps by integrating observations with models. Here, we integrate snow depth retrievals into a physically-based snow model across the European Alps. This work offers advancements for snow data assimilation, such as incorporating a dynamic observational uncertainty, which is essential for forecasting and water resource management.
Qianqian Han, Yijian Zeng, Yunfei Wang, Fakhereh Sarah Alidoost, Francesco Nattino, Yang Liu, and Bob Su
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-183, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-183, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how land interacts with the atmosphere is crucial for studying climate change, yet global high-resolution data on energy, water, and carbon exchanges remain limited. This study introduces a new dataset that estimates these exchanges hourly from 2000 to 2020 by combining physical process model, field measurements, and machine learning with satellite and meteorological data. Our dataset provides valuable insights into how ecosystems respond to climate extremes worldwide.
Gerald Dicen, Floriane Guillevic, Surya Gupta, Pierre-Alexis Chaboche, Katrin Meusburger, Pierre Sabatier, Olivier Evrard, and Christine Alewell
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1529–1549, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1529-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Fallout radionuclides (FRNs) such as 137Cs and 239+240Pu are considered to be critical tools in various environmental research. Here, we compiled reference soil data on these FRNs from the literature to build a comprehensive database. Using this database, we determined the distribution and sources of 137Cs and 239+240Pu. We also demonstrated how the database can be used to identify the environmental factors that influence their distribution using a machine learning algorithm.
Marliana Tri Widyastuti, José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, Mathew Webb, Muh Taufik, and Darren Kidd
SOIL, 11, 287–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work aims to predict soil water content at a fine spatiotemporal resolution (80 m grids, daily) to support agricultural management in Tasmania. It proves that transfer learning can improve the accuracy of deep learning models to predict multilevel soil moisture. We address the challenge of mapping soil moisture at field-scale resolution and integrate the model into a near-real-time monitoring system.
Amelie Fees, Michael Lombardo, Alec van Herwijnen, Peter Lehmann, and Jürg Schweizer
The Cryosphere, 19, 1453–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1453-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1453-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Glide-snow avalanches release at the soil–snow interface due to a loss of friction, which is suspected to be linked to interfacial water. The importance of the interfacial water was investigated with a spatio-temporal monitoring setup for soil and local snow on an avalanche-prone slope. Seven glide-snow avalanches were released on the monitoring grid (winter seasons 2021/22 to 2023/24) and provided insights into the source, quantity, and spatial distribution of interfacial water before avalanche release.
Manuela S. Kaufmann, Anja Klotzsche, Jan van der Kruk, Anke Langen, Harry Vereecken, and Lutz Weihermüller
SOIL, 11, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-267-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-267-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To use fertilizers more effectively, non-invasive geophysical methods can be used to understand nutrient distributions in the soil. We utilize, in a long-term field study, geophysical techniques to study soil properties and conditions under different fertilizer treatments. We compared the geophysical response with soil samples and soil sensor data. In particular, electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography were effective in monitoring changes in nitrate levels over time.
Bamidele Oloruntoba, Stefan Kollet, Carsten Montzka, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1659–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1659-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1659-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how soil and weather data affect land model simulations over Africa. By combining soil data processed in different ways with weather data of varying time intervals, we found that weather inputs had a greater impact on water processes than soil data type. However, the way soil data were processed became crucial when paired with high-frequency weather inputs, showing that detailed weather data can improve local and regional predictions of how water moves and interacts with the land.
Mona Giraud, Ahmet Kürşad Sırcan, Thilo Streck, Daniel Leitner, Guillaume Lobet, Holger Pagel, and Andrea Schnepf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-572, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-572, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a multiscale simulation model that combines 3D plant architecture with carbon cycling in the rhizosphere and soil to understand how dry spells impact carbon and water flows, focusing on the activity of the soil microbes. We found that the microbial communities’ characteristics and dry spells’ start dates significantly affect rhizosphere CO2 emissions and carbon cycling. This model can help understand the effects of climate change on plant growth and soil organic matter dynamics.
Jordi Buckley Paules, Simone Fatichi, Bonnie Warring, and Athanasios Paschalis
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1287–1305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present and validate enhancements to the process-based T&C model aimed at improving its representation of crop growth and management practices. The updated model, T&C-CROP, enables applications such as analysing the hydrological and carbon storage impacts of land use transitions (e.g. conversions between crops, forests, and pastures) and optimizing irrigation and fertilization strategies in response to climate change.
Salar Saeed Dogar, Cosimo Brogi, Dave O'Leary, Ixchel Hernández-Ochoa, Marco Donat, Harry Vereecken, and Johan Alexander Huisman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-827, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-827, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Farmers need precise information about their fields to use water, fertilizers, and other resources efficiently. This study combines underground soil data and satellite images to create detailed field maps using advanced machine learning. By testing different ways of processing data, we ensured a balanced and accurate approach. The results help farmers manage their land more effectively, leading to better harvests and more sustainable farming practices.
Kachinga Silwimba, Alejandro N. Flores, Irene Cionni, Sharon A. Billings, Pamela L. Sullivan, Hoori Ajami, Daniel R. Hirmas, and Li Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-713, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-713, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the influence of soil hydraulic parameterizations on soil moisture simulations in CLM5 across the CONUS (1980–2010) using Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis. Results reveal significant regional discrepancies, particularly in the Great Plains, where parameter uncertainty drives biases in soil moisture variability. Comparisons with ERA5-Land highlight seasonal mismatches, underscoring the need for improved soil parameterization to enhance land surface model accuracy.
Michael Lombardo, Amelie Fees, Anders Kaestner, Alec van Herwijnen, Jürg Schweizer, and Peter Lehmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-304, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-304, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Water flow in snow is important for many applications including snow hydrology and avalanche forecasting. This work investigated the role of capillary forces at the soil-snow interface during capillary rise experiments using neutron radiography. The results showed that the properties of both the snow and the transitional layer below the snow affected the water flow. This work will allow for better representations of water flow across the soil-snow interface in snowpack models.
Lena Wang, Sharon Billings, Li Li, Daniel Hirmas, Keira Johnson, Devon Kerins, Julio Pachon, Curtis Beutler, Karla Jarecke, Vaishnavi Varikuti, Micah Unruh, Hoori Ajami, Holly Barnard, Alejandro Flores, Kenneth Williams, and Pamela Sullivan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-70, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-70, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study looked at how different forest types and conditions affected soil microbes, and soil carbon and stability. Aspen organic matter led to higher microbial activity, smaller soil aggregates, and more stable soil carbon, possibly reducing dissolved organic carbon movement from hillslopes to streams. This shows the importance of models like the Microbial Efficiency – Matrix Stabilization framework for predicting CO2 release, soil carbon stability, and carbon movement.
Paolo Nasta, Günter Blöschl, Heye R. Bogena, Steffen Zacharias, Roland Baatz, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Karsten H. Jensen, Salvatore Manfreda, Laurent Pfister, Ana M. Tarquis, Ilja van Meerveld, Marc Voltz, Yijian Zeng, William Kustas, Xin Li, Harry Vereecken, and Nunzio Romano
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 465–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Unsolved Problems in Hydrology (UPH) initiative has emphasized the need to establish networks of multi-decadal hydrological observatories to tackle catchment-scale challenges on a global scale. This opinion paper provocatively discusses two endmembers of possible future hydrological observatory (HO) networks for a given hypothesized community budget: a comprehensive set of moderately instrumented observatories or, alternatively, a small number of highly instrumented supersites.
Yiran Wang, Naika Meili, and Simone Fatichi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 381–396, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-381-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-381-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we use climate model simulations and process-based ecohydrological modeling to assess the effects of solar radiation changes on hydrological variables. Results show that direct changes in solar radiation without the land–atmosphere feedback primarily affects sensible heat with limited effects on hydrology and vegetation. However, including land–atmosphere feedbacks exacerbates the effects of radiation changes on evapotranspiration and modifies vegetation productivity.
Christian Poppe Terán, Bibi S. Naz, Harry Vereecken, Roland Baatz, Rosie A. Fisher, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 287–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon and water exchanges between the atmosphere and the land surface contribute to water resource availability and climate change mitigation. Land surface models, like the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5), simulate these. This study finds that CLM5 and other data sets underestimate the magnitudes of and variability in carbon and water exchanges for the most abundant plant functional types compared to observations. It provides essential insights for further research into these processes.
Benjamin Guillaume, Adrien Michez, and Aurore Degré
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3978, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3978, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Nature-based solutions (NbS) can mitigate floods and agricultural droughts by enhancing soil health and restoring hydrological cycles. This study highlights that leveraging soil diversity is key to optimizing NbS performance.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabrielle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974019, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974019, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study estimates irrigation in the Po Valley using AquaCrop and Noah-MP models with sprinkler irrigation. Noah-MP shows higher annual rates than AquaCrop due to more water losses. After adjusting, both align with reported irrigation ranges (500–600 mm/yr). Soil moisture estimates from both models match satellite data, though both have limitations in vegetation and evapotranspiration modeling. The study emphasizes the need for observations to improve irrigation estimates.
Zengjing Song, Yijian Zeng, Yunfei Wang, Enting Tang, Danyang Yu, Fakhereh Alidoost, Mingguo Ma, Xujun Han, Xuguang Tang, Zhongjing Zhu, Yao Xiao, Debing Kong, and Zhongbo Su
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2940, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The exchange of water and carbon between the plant and the atmosphere is affected under water stress conditions. In this study, a leaf-water-potential-based water stress factor is considered in the STEMMUS-SCOPE (hereafter STEMMUS-SCOPE-PHS), to replace the conventional soil-moisture-based water stress factor. The results show that leaf water potential reflects the plant water stress well, and the STEMMUS-SCOPE-PHS outperforms STEMMUS-SCOPE in the dynamics of the water, energy and carbon fluxes.
Amelie Fees, Alec van Herwijnen, Michael Lombardo, Jürg Schweizer, and Peter Lehmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3387–3400, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Glide-snow avalanches release at the ground–snow interface, and their release process is poorly understood. To investigate the influence of spatial variability (snowpack and basal friction) on avalanche release, we developed a 3D, mechanical, threshold-based model that reproduces an observed release area distribution. A sensitivity analysis showed that the distribution was mostly influenced by the basal friction uniformity, while the variations in snowpack properties had little influence.
Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6949–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The soil water potential (SWP) determines various soil water processes. Since remote sensing techniques cannot measure it directly, it is often deduced from volumetric water content (VWC) information. However, under dynamic field conditions, the relationship between SWP and VWC is highly ambiguous due to different factors that cannot be modeled with the classical approach. Applying a deep neural network with an autoencoder enables the prediction of the dynamic SWP.
Brigitta Szabó, Piroska Kassai, Svajunas Plunge, Attila Nemes, Péter Braun, Michael Strauch, Felix Witing, János Mészáros, and Natalja Čerkasova
SOIL, 10, 587–617, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-587-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-587-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research introduces methods and tools for obtaining soil input data in European case studies for environmental models like SWAT+. With various available soil datasets and prediction methods, determining the most suitable is challenging. The study aims to (i) catalogue open-access datasets and prediction methods for Europe, (ii) demonstrate and quantify differences between prediction approaches, and (iii) offer a comprehensive workflow with open-source R codes for deriving missing soil data.
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Gao et al. (2023) question the importance of soil in hydrology, sparking debate. We acknowledge some valid points but critique their broad, unsubstantiated views on soil's role. Our response highlights three key areas: (1) the false divide between ecosystem-centric and soil-centric approaches, (2) the vital yet varied impact of soil properties, and (3) the call for a scale-aware framework. We aim to unify these perspectives, enhancing hydrology's comprehensive understanding.
Marliana Tri Widyastuti, Budiman Minasny, José Padarian, Federico Maggi, Matt Aitkenhead, Amélie Beucher, John Connolly, Dian Fiantis, Darren Kidd, Yuxin Ma, Fraser Macfarlane, Ciaran Robb, Rudiyanto, Budi Indra Setiawan, and Muh Taufik
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-333, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-333, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
PEATGRIDS, the first dataset containing maps of global peat thickness and carbon stock at 1 km resolution. The dataset has been publicly available at Zenodo to support further analyses and modelling of peatlands across the globe. This work employed the random forest machine learning model to provide spatially explicit peat carbon stock at pixel basis.
Christian Lehr and Tobias Ludwig Hohenbrink
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-172, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-172, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
In hydrology, domain dependence (DD) of spatial Principal Component patterns is a rather unknown feature of the widely applied Principal Component Analysis. It easily leads to wrong hydrological interpretations. DD reference patterns enable to differentiate from the effect. Here, we (1) explore the DD effect, (2) present two methods to calculate DD reference patterns and (3) discuss considering DD. Scripts with an introduction to the DD effect and an implementation of both methods are provided.
Joschka Neumann, Nicolas Brüggemann, Patrick Chaumet, Normen Hermes, Jan Huwer, Peter Kirchner, Werner Lesmeister, Wilhelm August Mertens, Thomas Pütz, Jörg Wolters, Harry Vereecken, and Ghaleb Natour
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1598, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1598, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change in combination with a steadily growing world population and a simultaneous decrease in agricultural land is one of the greatest global challenges facing mankind. In this context, Forschungszentrum Jülich established an "agricultural simulator" (AgraSim), which enables research into the effects of climate change on agricultural ecosystems and the optimization of agricultural cultivation and management strategies with the aid of combined experimental and numerical simulation.
Danyang Gao, Albert S. Chen, Toby Richard Marthews, and Fayyaz Ali Memon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-166, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-166, 2024
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This work evaluated how runoff, flood and drought risks might change in China due to climate change. We found annual runoff is expected to increase notably under high emission scenario. Across most months, runoff is expected to increase, particularly during summer. Wetter summers and drier winters are expected in south China, while the opposite is expected in the north. Flood risks are expected to increase in the south, while drought risks are expected to rise in the south and centre.
Yunfei Wang, Yijian Zeng, Zengjing Song, Danyang Yu, Qianqian Han, Enting Tang, Henk de Bruin, and Zhongbo Su
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1321, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1321, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Various methods were proposed to estimate irrigation water requirements (IWR). However, the simulated IWR exhibits large differences. This study evaluates six potential evapotranspiration (PET) methods and proposes a practical approach to estimate IWR. The radiation-based methods show promise in approximating daily PET accurately, and the STEMMUS-SCOPE model can reliably estimate IWR. This research enhances our understanding of different PET methods and their implications for water management.
Frisa Irawan Ginting, Rudiyanto Rudiyanto, Fatchurahman, Ramisah Mohd Shah, Norhidayah Che Soh, Sunny Goh Eng Giap, Dian Fiantis, Budi Indra Setiawan, Sam Schiller, Aaron Davitt, and Budiman Minasny
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-90, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-90, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This study is the first to map rice cropping intensity and the harvested area across Southeast Asia at a spatial resolution of 10 m (SEA-Rice-Ci10). We have developed a geospatial inventory of paddy rice parcels and rice cropping intensity by integrating Sentinel-1 and 2 time-series data in a framework called LUCK-PALM, based on local phenological expert interpretation. According to our best knowledge, it is the finest-resolution and most accurate database of paddy rice in Southeast Asia.
Lukas Strebel, Heye Bogena, Harry Vereecken, Mie Andreasen, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1001–1026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1001-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1001-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present results from using soil water content measurements from 13 European forest sites in a state-of-the-art land surface model. We use data assimilation to perform a combination of observed and modeled soil water content and show the improvements in the representation of soil water content. However, we also look at the impact on evapotranspiration and see no corresponding improvements.
Enting Tang, Yijian Zeng, Yunfei Wang, Zengjing Song, Danyang Yu, Hongyue Wu, Chenglong Qiao, Christiaan van der Tol, Lingtong Du, and Zhongbo Su
Biogeosciences, 21, 893–909, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-893-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-893-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study shows that planting shrubs in a semiarid grassland reduced the soil moisture and increased plant water uptake and transpiration. Notably, the water used by the ecosystem exceeded the rainfall received during the growing seasons, indicating an imbalance in the water cycle. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the STEMMUS–SCOPE model as a tool to represent ecohydrological processes and highlight the need to consider energy and water budgets for future revegetation projects.
Louise J. Schreyers, Tim H. M. van Emmerik, Thanh-Khiet L. Bui, Khoa L. van Thi, Bart Vermeulen, Hong-Q. Nguyen, Nicholas Wallerstein, Remko Uijlenhoet, and Martine van der Ploeg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 589–610, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-589-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-589-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
River plastic emissions into the ocean are of global concern, but the transfer dynamics between fresh water and the marine environment remain poorly understood. We developed a simple Eulerian approach to estimate the net and total plastic transport in tidal rivers. Applied to the Saigon River, Vietnam, we found that net plastic transport amounted to less than one-third of total transport, highlighting the need to better integrate tidal dynamics in plastic transport and emission models.
Jonas Mortelmans, Anne Felsberg, Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, Sander Veraverbeke, Robert D. Field, Niels Andela, and Michel Bechtold
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 445–464, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-445-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
With global warming increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires in the boreal region, accurate risk assessments are becoming more crucial than ever before. The Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) is a renowned system, yet its effectiveness in peatlands, where hydrology plays a key role, is limited. By incorporating groundwater data from numerical models and satellite observations, our modified FWI improves the accuracy of fire danger predictions, especially over summer.
Gina Garland, John Koestel, Alice Johannes, Olivier Heller, Sebastian Doetterl, Dani Or, and Thomas Keller
SOIL, 10, 23–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-23-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-23-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The concept of soil aggregates is hotly debated, leading to confusion about their function or relevancy to soil processes. We propose that the use of conceptual figures showing detached and isolated aggregates can be misleading and has contributed to this skepticism. Here, we conceptually illustrate how aggregates can form and dissipate within the context of undisturbed soils, highlighting the fact that aggregates do not necessarily need to have distinct physical boundaries.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Denise Degen, Daniel Caviedes Voullième, Susanne Buiter, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Harry Vereecken, Ana González-Nicolás, and Florian Wellmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7375–7409, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In geosciences, we often use simulations based on physical laws. These simulations can be computationally expensive, which is a problem if simulations must be performed many times (e.g., to add error bounds). We show how a novel machine learning method helps to reduce simulation time. In comparison to other approaches, which typically only look at the output of a simulation, the method considers physical laws in the simulation itself. The method provides reliable results faster than standard.
Samuel Scherrer, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Zdenko Heyvaert, Michel Bechtold, Clement Albergel, Tarek S. El-Madany, and Wouter Dorigo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4087–4114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4087-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4087-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We explored different options for data assimilation (DA) of the remotely sensed leaf area index (LAI). We found strong biases between LAI predicted by Noah-MP and observations. LAI DA that does not take these biases into account can induce unphysical patterns in the resulting LAI and flux estimates and leads to large changes in the climatology of root zone soil moisture. We tested two bias-correction approaches and explored alternative solutions to treating bias in LAI DA.
Maria Eliza Turek, Attila Nemes, and Annelie Holzkämper
SOIL, 9, 545–560, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-545-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-545-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we systematically evaluated prospective crop transpiration benefits of sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC) under current and future climatic conditions based on the model SWAP. We found that adding at least 2% SOC down to at least 65 cm depth could increase transpiration annually by almost 40 mm, which can play a role in mitigating drought impacts in rain-fed cropping. Beyond this threshold, additional crop transpiration benefits of sequestering SOC are only marginal.
Qianqian Han, Yijian Zeng, Lijie Zhang, Calimanut-Ionut Cira, Egor Prikaziuk, Ting Duan, Chao Wang, Brigitta Szabó, Salvatore Manfreda, Ruodan Zhuang, and Bob Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5825–5845, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5825-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5825-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using machine learning, we estimated global surface soil moisture (SSM) to aid in understanding water, energy, and carbon exchange. Ensemble models outperformed individual algorithms in predicting SSM under different climates. The best-performing ensemble included K-neighbours Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. This is important for hydrological and climatological applications such as water cycle monitoring, irrigation management, and crop yield prediction.
Hao Chen, Tiejun Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Yun Bai, and Xi Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5685–5701, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Effectively assembling multiple models for approaching a benchmark solution remains a long-standing issue for various geoscience domains. We here propose an automated machine learning-assisted ensemble framework (AutoML-Ens) that attempts to resolve this challenge. Results demonstrate the great potential of AutoML-Ens for improving estimations due to its two unique features, i.e., assigning dynamic weights for candidate models and taking full advantage of AutoML-assisted workflow.
Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Conrad Jackisch, Wolfgang Durner, Kai Germer, Sascha C. Iden, Janis Kreiselmeier, Frederic Leuther, Johanna C. Metzger, Mahyar Naseri, and Andre Peters
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4417–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The article describes a collection of 572 data sets of soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data measured with state-of-the-art laboratory methods. Furthermore, the data collection contains basic soil properties such as soil texture and organic carbon content. We expect that the data will be useful for various important purposes, for example, the development of soil hydraulic property models and related pedotransfer functions.
Theresa Boas, Heye Reemt Bogena, Dongryeol Ryu, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3143–3167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we tested the utility and skill of a state-of-the-art forecasting product for the prediction of regional crop productivity using a land surface model. Our results illustrate the potential value and skill of combining seasonal forecasts with modelling applications to generate variables of interest for stakeholders, such as annual crop yield for specific cash crops and regions. In addition, this study provides useful insights for future technical model evaluations and improvements.
Guillaume Blanchy, Lukas Albrecht, Gilberto Bragato, Sarah Garré, Nicholas Jarvis, and John Koestel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2703–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2703-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2703-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We collated the Open Tension-disk Infiltrometer Meta-database (OTIM). We analysed topsoil hydraulic conductivities at supply tensions between 0 and 100 mm of 466 data entries. We found indications of different flow mechanisms at saturation and at tensions >20 mm. Climate factors were better correlated with near-saturated hydraulic conductivities than soil properties. Land use, tillage system, soil compaction and experimenter bias significantly influenced K to a similar degree to soil properties.
Kai-Gao Ouyang, Xiao-Wei Jiang, Gang Mei, Hong-Bin Yan, Ran Niu, Li Wan, and Yijian Zeng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2579–2590, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2579-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2579-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our knowledge on sources and dynamics of rock moisture is limited. By using frequency domain reflectometry (FDR), we monitored rock moisture in a cave. The results of an explainable deep learning model reveal that the direct source of rock moisture responsible for weathering in the studied cave is vapour, not infiltrating precipitation. A physics-informed deep learning model, which uses variables controlling vapor condensation as model inputs, leads to accurate rock water content predictions.
Benjamin Guillaume, Hanane Aroui Boukbida, Gerben Bakker, Andrzej Bieganowski, Yves Brostaux, Wim Cornelis, Wolfgang Durner, Christian Hartmann, Bo V. Iversen, Mathieu Javaux, Joachim Ingwersen, Krzysztof Lamorski, Axel Lamparter, András Makó, Ana María Mingot Soriano, Ingmar Messing, Attila Nemes, Alexandre Pomes-Bordedebat, Martine van der Ploeg, Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Joost Wellens, and Aurore Degré
SOIL, 9, 365–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of soil water retention properties play an important role in a variety of societal issues that depend on soil water conditions. However, there is little concern about the consistency of these measurements between laboratories. We conducted an interlaboratory comparison to assess the reproducibility of the measurement of the soil water retention curve. Results highlight the need to harmonize and standardize procedures to improve the description of unsaturated processes in soils.
Wartini Ng, Budiman Minasny, Alex McBratney, Patrice de Caritat, and John Wilford
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2465–2482, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
With a higher demand for lithium (Li), a better understanding of its concentration and spatial distribution is important to delineate potential anomalous areas. This study uses a framework that combines data from recent geochemical surveys and relevant environmental factors to predict and map Li content across Australia. The map shows high Li concentration around existing mines and other potentially anomalous Li areas. The same mapping principles can potentially be applied to other elements.
Lianyu Yu, Yijian Zeng, Huanjie Cai, Mengna Li, Yuanyuan Zha, Jicai Zeng, Hui Qian, and Zhongbo Su
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-221, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-221, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a coupled soil water-groundwater (SW-GW) model, which is verified as physically accurate and applicable in large-scale groundwater problems. The role of vadose zone processes, coupling approach, and spatiotemporal heterogeneity of SW-GW interactions were highlighted as essential to represent the SW-GW system. Given the relevant dataset, the developed SW-GW modeling framework has the potential to portray the processes "from bedrock to atmosphere" in a physically consistent manner.
Mercedes Román Dobarco, Alexandre M. J-C. Wadoux, Brendan Malone, Budiman Minasny, Alex B. McBratney, and Ross Searle
Biogeosciences, 20, 1559–1586, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1559-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1559-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is of a heterogeneous nature and varies in chemistry, stabilisation mechanisms, and persistence in soil. In this study we mapped the stocks of SOC fractions with different characteristics and turnover rates (presumably PyOC >= MAOC > POC) across Australia, combining spectroscopy and digital soil mapping. The SOC stocks (0–30 cm) were estimated as 13 Pg MAOC, 2 Pg POC, and 5 Pg PyOC.
Andre Peters, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Sascha C. Iden, Martinus Th. van Genuchten, and Wolfgang Durner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1565–1582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The soil hydraulic conductivity function is usually predicted from the water retention curve (WRC) with the requirement of at least one measured conductivity data point for scaling the function. We propose a new scheme of absolute hydraulic conductivity prediction from the WRC without the need of measured conductivity data. Testing the new prediction with independent data shows good results. This scheme can be used when insufficient or no conductivity data are available.
Guillaume Blanchy, Lukas Albrecht, John Koestel, and Sarah Garré
SOIL, 9, 155–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-155-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-155-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Adapting agricultural practices to future climatic conditions requires us to synthesize the effects of management practices on soil properties with respect to local soil and climate. We showcase different automated text-processing methods to identify topics, extract metadata for building a database and summarize findings from publication abstracts. While human intervention remains essential, these methods show great potential to support evidence synthesis from large numbers of publications.
Adrian Wicki, Peter Lehmann, Christian Hauck, and Manfred Stähli
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1059–1077, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1059-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1059-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Soil wetness measurements are used for shallow landslide prediction; however, existing sites are often located in flat terrain. Here, we assessed the ability of monitoring sites at flat locations to detect critically saturated conditions compared to if they were situated at a landslide-prone location. We found that differences exist but that both sites could equally well distinguish critical from non-critical conditions for shallow landslide triggering if relative changes are considered.
Florian Späth, Verena Rajtschan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Shehan Morandage, Diego Lange, Syed Saqlain Abbas, Andreas Behrendt, Joachim Ingwersen, Thilo Streck, and Volker Wulfmeyer
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 25–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Important topics in land–atmosphere feedback research are water and energy balances and heterogeneities of fluxes at the land surface and in the atmosphere. To target these questions, the Land–Atmosphere Feedback Observatory (LAFO) has been installed in Germany. The instrumentation allows for comprehensive measurements from the bedrock to the troposphere. The LAFO observation strategy aims for simultaneous measurements in all three compartments: atmosphere, soil and land surface, and vegetation.
Robert J. Parker, Chris Wilson, Edward Comyn-Platt, Garry Hayman, Toby R. Marthews, A. Anthony Bloom, Mark F. Lunt, Nicola Gedney, Simon J. Dadson, Joe McNorton, Neil Humpage, Hartmut Boesch, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Paul I. Palmer, and Dai Yamazaki
Biogeosciences, 19, 5779–5805, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane, one of the most important climate gases. The JULES land surface model simulates these emissions. We use satellite data to evaluate how well JULES reproduces the methane seasonal cycle over different tropical wetlands. It performs well for most regions; however, it struggles for some African wetlands influenced heavily by river flooding. We explain the reasons for these deficiencies and highlight how future development will improve these areas.
Pei Zhang, Donghai Zheng, Rogier van der Velde, Jun Wen, Yaoming Ma, Yijian Zeng, Xin Wang, Zuoliang Wang, Jiali Chen, and Zhongbo Su
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5513–5542, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5513-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5513-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil moisture and soil temperature (SMST) are important state variables for quantifying the heat–water exchange between land and atmosphere. Yet, long-term, regional-scale in situ SMST measurements at multiple depths are scarce on the Tibetan Plateau (TP). The presented dataset would be valuable for the evaluation and improvement of long-term satellite- and model-based SMST products on the TP, enhancing the understanding of TP hydrometeorological processes and their response to climate change.
Hong Zhao, Yijian Zeng, Jan G. Hofste, Ting Duan, Jun Wen, and Zhongbo Su
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-333, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-333, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This paper demonstrated the capability of our developed platform for simulating microwave emission and backscatter signals at multi-frequency. The results of associated investigations on impacts of vegetation water (VW) and temperature (T) imply the need to first disentangle the impact of T for the use of high-frequency signals as its variation is more due to dynamic T. Estimated vegetation optical depth is frequency-dependent, while its diurnal variation depends on that of VW despite frequency.
Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Michel Bechtold, Hans Lievens, Angelica Tarpanelli, Luca Brocca, Luca Zappa, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4685–4706, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4685-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4685-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Given the crucial impact of irrigation practices on the water cycle, this study aims at estimating irrigation through the development of an innovative data assimilation system able to ingest high-resolution Sentinel-1 radar observations into the Noah-MP land surface model. The developed methodology has important implications for global water resource management and the comprehension of human impacts on the water cycle and identifies main challenges and outlooks for future research.
Anne Felsberg, Jean Poesen, Michel Bechtold, Matthias Vanmaercke, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3063–3082, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3063-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3063-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we assessed global landslide susceptibility at the coarse 36 km spatial resolution of global satellite soil moisture observations to prepare for a subsequent combination of the two. Specifically, we focus therefore on the susceptibility of hydrologically triggered landslides. We introduce ensemble techniques, common in, for example, meteorology but not yet in the landslide community, to retrieve reliable estimates of the total prediction uncertainty.
Stefano Manzoni, Simone Fatichi, Xue Feng, Gabriel G. Katul, Danielle Way, and Giulia Vico
Biogeosciences, 19, 4387–4414, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) causes leaves to close their stomata (through which water evaporates) but also promotes leaf growth. Even if individual leaves save water, how much will be consumed by a whole plant with possibly more leaves? Using different mathematical models, we show that plant stands that are not very dense and can grow more leaves will benefit from higher CO2 by photosynthesizing more while adjusting their stomata to consume similar amounts of water.
Toby R. Marthews, Simon J. Dadson, Douglas B. Clark, Eleanor M. Blyth, Garry D. Hayman, Dai Yamazaki, Olivia R. E. Becher, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, Catherine Prigent, and Carlos Jiménez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3151–3175, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3151-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3151-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable data on global inundated areas remain uncertain. By matching a leading global data product on inundation extents (GIEMS) against predictions from a global hydrodynamic model (CaMa-Flood), we found small but consistent and non-random biases in well-known tropical wetlands (Sudd, Pantanal, Amazon and Congo). These result from known limitations in the data and the models used, which shows us how to improve our ability to make critical predictions of inundation events in the future.
Jordan Bates, Francois Jonard, Rajina Bajracharya, Harry Vereecken, and Carsten Montzka
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 23, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-23-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-23-2022, 2022
Wei Qu, Heye Bogena, Christoph Schüth, Harry Vereecken, Zongmei Li, and Stephan Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, 2022
Publication in GMD not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
We applied the global sensitivity analysis LH-OAT to the integrated hydrology model ParFlow-CLM to investigate the sensitivity of the 12 parameters for different scenarios. And we found that the general patterns of the parameter sensitivities were consistent, however, for some parameters a significantly larger span of the sensitivities was observed, especially for the higher slope and in subarctic climatic scenarios.
Stefan Fugger, Catriona L. Fyffe, Simone Fatichi, Evan Miles, Michael McCarthy, Thomas E. Shaw, Baohong Ding, Wei Yang, Patrick Wagnon, Walter Immerzeel, Qiao Liu, and Francesca Pellicciotti
The Cryosphere, 16, 1631–1652, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1631-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1631-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The monsoon is important for the shrinking and growing of glaciers in the Himalaya during summer. We calculate the melt of seven glaciers in the region using a complex glacier melt model and weather data. We find that monsoonal weather affects glaciers that are covered with a layer of rocky debris and glaciers without such a layer in different ways. It is important to take so-called turbulent fluxes into account. This knowledge is vital for predicting the future of the Himalayan glaciers.
Nicholas Jarvis, Jannis Groh, Elisabet Lewan, Katharina H. E. Meurer, Walter Durka, Cornelia Baessler, Thomas Pütz, Elvin Rufullayev, and Harry Vereecken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2277–2299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2277-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2277-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We apply an eco-hydrological model to data on soil water balance and grassland growth obtained at two sites with contrasting climates. Our results show that the grassland in the drier climate had adapted by developing deeper roots, which maintained water supply to the plants in the face of severe drought. Our study emphasizes the importance of considering such plastic responses of plant traits to environmental stress in the modelling of soil water balance and plant growth under climate change.
Michelle Viswanathan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Sebastian Gayler, Juliane Mai, and Thilo Streck
Biogeosciences, 19, 2187–2209, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2187-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2187-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We analysed the evolution of model parameter uncertainty and prediction error as we updated parameters of a maize phenology model based on yearly observations, by sequentially applying Bayesian calibration. Although parameter uncertainty was reduced, prediction quality deteriorated when calibration and prediction data were from different maize ripening groups or temperature conditions. The study highlights that Bayesian methods should account for model limitations and inherent data structures.
Tobias K. D. Weber, Joachim Ingwersen, Petra Högy, Arne Poyda, Hans-Dieter Wizemann, Michael Scott Demyan, Kristina Bohm, Ravshan Eshonkulov, Sebastian Gayler, Pascal Kremer, Moritz Laub, Yvonne Funkiun Nkwain, Christian Troost, Irene Witte, Tim Reichenau, Thomas Berger, Georg Cadisch, Torsten Müller, Andreas Fangmeier, Volker Wulfmeyer, and Thilo Streck
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1153–1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Presented are measurement results from six agricultural fields operated by local farmers in southwestern Germany over 9 years. Six eddy-covariance stations measuring water, energy, and carbon fluxes between the vegetated soil surface and the atmosphere provided the backbone of the measurement sites and were supplemented by extensive soil and vegetation state monitoring. The dataset is ideal for testing process models characterizing fluxes at the vegetated soil surface and in the atmosphere.
Heye Reemt Bogena, Martin Schrön, Jannis Jakobi, Patrizia Ney, Steffen Zacharias, Mie Andreasen, Roland Baatz, David Boorman, Mustafa Berk Duygu, Miguel Angel Eguibar-Galán, Benjamin Fersch, Till Franke, Josie Geris, María González Sanchis, Yann Kerr, Tobias Korf, Zalalem Mengistu, Arnaud Mialon, Paolo Nasta, Jerzy Nitychoruk, Vassilios Pisinaras, Daniel Rasche, Rafael Rosolem, Hami Said, Paul Schattan, Marek Zreda, Stefan Achleitner, Eduardo Albentosa-Hernández, Zuhal Akyürek, Theresa Blume, Antonio del Campo, Davide Canone, Katya Dimitrova-Petrova, John G. Evans, Stefano Ferraris, Félix Frances, Davide Gisolo, Andreas Güntner, Frank Herrmann, Joost Iwema, Karsten H. Jensen, Harald Kunstmann, Antonio Lidón, Majken Caroline Looms, Sascha Oswald, Andreas Panagopoulos, Amol Patil, Daniel Power, Corinna Rebmann, Nunzio Romano, Lena Scheiffele, Sonia Seneviratne, Georg Weltin, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1125–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Monitoring of increasingly frequent droughts is a prerequisite for climate adaptation strategies. This data paper presents long-term soil moisture measurements recorded by 66 cosmic-ray neutron sensors (CRNS) operated by 24 institutions and distributed across major climate zones in Europe. Data processing followed harmonized protocols and state-of-the-art methods to generate consistent and comparable soil moisture products and to facilitate continental-scale analysis of hydrological extremes.
Lukas Strebel, Heye R. Bogena, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 395–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present the technical coupling between a land surface model (CLM5) and the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework (PDAF). This coupling enables measurement data to update simulated model states and parameters in a statistically optimal way. We demonstrate the viability of the model framework using an application in a forested catchment where the inclusion of soil water measurements significantly improved the simulation quality.
Shaoning Lv, Clemens Simmer, Yijian Zeng, Jun Wen, Yuanyuan Guo, and Zhongbo Su
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-369, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-369, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
The freeze-thaw of the ground is an interesting topic to climatology, hydrology, and other earth sciences. The global freeze-thaw distribution is available by passive microwave remote sensing technique. However, the remote sensing technique indirectly detects freeze-thaw states by measuring the brightness temperature difference between frozen and unfrozen soil. Thus, we present different interprets of the brightness signals to the FT-state by using its sub-daily character.
Veronika Forstner, Jannis Groh, Matevz Vremec, Markus Herndl, Harry Vereecken, Horst H. Gerke, Steffen Birk, and Thomas Pütz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6087–6106, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6087-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6087-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Lysimeter-based manipulative and observational experiments were used to identify responses of water fluxes and aboveground biomass (AGB) to climatic change in permanent grassland. Under energy-limited conditions, elevated temperature actual evapotranspiration (ETa) increased, while seepage, dew, and AGB decreased. Elevated CO2 mitigated the effect on ETa. Under water limitation, elevated temperature resulted in reduced ETa, and AGB was negatively correlated with an increasing aridity.
Lianyu Yu, Yijian Zeng, and Zhongbo Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7345–7376, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7345-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7345-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an integrated soil–snow–atmosphere model (STEMMUS-UEB) dedicated to the physical description of snow and soil processes with various complexities. With STEMMUS-UEB, we demonstrated that the snowpack affects not only the soil surface moisture conditions (in the liquid and ice phase) and energy-related states (albedo, LE) but also the subsurface soil water and vapor transfer, which contributes to a better understanding of the hydrothermal implications of the snowpack in cold regions.
Yafei Huang, Jonas Weis, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-569, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-569, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Trends in agricultural droughts cannot be easily deduced from measurements. Here trends in agricultural droughts over 31 German and Dutch sites were calculated with model simulations and long-term observed meteorological data as input. We found that agricultural droughts are increasing although precipitation hardly decreases. The increase is driven by increase in evapotranspiration. The year 2018 was for half of the sites the year with the most extreme agricultural drought in the last 55 years.
Wouter Dorigo, Irene Himmelbauer, Daniel Aberer, Lukas Schremmer, Ivana Petrakovic, Luca Zappa, Wolfgang Preimesberger, Angelika Xaver, Frank Annor, Jonas Ardö, Dennis Baldocchi, Marco Bitelli, Günter Blöschl, Heye Bogena, Luca Brocca, Jean-Christophe Calvet, J. Julio Camarero, Giorgio Capello, Minha Choi, Michael C. Cosh, Nick van de Giesen, Istvan Hajdu, Jaakko Ikonen, Karsten H. Jensen, Kasturi Devi Kanniah, Ileen de Kat, Gottfried Kirchengast, Pankaj Kumar Rai, Jenni Kyrouac, Kristine Larson, Suxia Liu, Alexander Loew, Mahta Moghaddam, José Martínez Fernández, Cristian Mattar Bader, Renato Morbidelli, Jan P. Musial, Elise Osenga, Michael A. Palecki, Thierry Pellarin, George P. Petropoulos, Isabella Pfeil, Jarrett Powers, Alan Robock, Christoph Rüdiger, Udo Rummel, Michael Strobel, Zhongbo Su, Ryan Sullivan, Torbern Tagesson, Andrej Varlagin, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Jeffrey Walker, Jun Wen, Fred Wenger, Jean Pierre Wigneron, Mel Woods, Kun Yang, Yijian Zeng, Xiang Zhang, Marek Zreda, Stephan Dietrich, Alexander Gruber, Peter van Oevelen, Wolfgang Wagner, Klaus Scipal, Matthias Drusch, and Roberto Sabia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5749–5804, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5749-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5749-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) is a community-based open-access data portal for soil water measurements taken at the ground and is accessible at https://ismn.earth. Over 1000 scientific publications and thousands of users have made use of the ISMN. The scope of this paper is to inform readers about the data and functionality of the ISMN and to provide a review of the scientific progress facilitated through the ISMN with the scope to shape future research and operations.
Mengna Li, Yijian Zeng, Maciek W. Lubczynski, Jean Roy, Lianyu Yu, Hui Qian, Zhenyu Li, Jie Chen, Lei Han, Han Zheng, Tom Veldkamp, Jeroen M. Schoorl, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Kai Hou, Qiying Zhang, Panpan Xu, Fan Li, Kai Lu, Yulin Li, and Zhongbo Su
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4727–4757, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4727-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4727-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Tibetan Plateau is the source of most of Asia's major rivers and has been called the Asian Water Tower. Due to its remoteness and the harsh environment, there is a lack of field survey data to investigate its hydrogeology. Borehole core lithology analysis, an altitude survey, soil thickness measurement, hydrogeological surveys, and hydrogeophysical surveys were conducted in the Maqu catchment within the Yellow River source region to improve a full–picture understanding of the water cycle.
José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, Alex B. McBratney, and Pete Smith
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-73, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-73, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Soil organic carbon sequestration is considered an attractive technology to partially mitigate climate change. Here, we show how the SOC storage potential varies globally. The estimated additional SOC storage potential in the topsoil of global croplands (29–67 Pg C) equates to only 2 to 5 years of emissions offsetting and 32 % of agriculture's 92 Pg historical carbon debt. Since SOC is temperature-dependent, this potential is likely to reduce by 18 % by 2040 due to climate change.
Conrad Jackisch, Sibylle K. Hassler, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Theresa Blume, Hjalmar Laudon, Hilary McMillan, Patricia Saco, and Loes van Schaik
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5277–5285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, 2021
Bernd Schalge, Gabriele Baroni, Barbara Haese, Daniel Erdal, Gernot Geppert, Pablo Saavedra, Vincent Haefliger, Harry Vereecken, Sabine Attinger, Harald Kunstmann, Olaf A. Cirpka, Felix Ament, Stefan Kollet, Insa Neuweiler, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Clemens Simmer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4437–4464, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, a 9-year simulation of complete model output of a coupled atmosphere–land-surface–subsurface model on the catchment scale is discussed. We used the Neckar catchment in SW Germany as the basis of this simulation. Since the dataset includes the full model output, it is not only possible to investigate model behavior and interactions between the component models but also use it as a virtual truth for comparison of, for example, data assimilation experiments.
Jan Vanderborght, Valentin Couvreur, Felicien Meunier, Andrea Schnepf, Harry Vereecken, Martin Bouda, and Mathieu Javaux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4835–4860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4835-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4835-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Root water uptake is an important process in the terrestrial water cycle. How this process depends on soil water content, root distributions, and root properties is a soil–root hydraulic problem. We compare different approaches to implementing root hydraulics in macroscopic soil water flow and land surface models.
Adrian Wicki, Per-Erik Jansson, Peter Lehmann, Christian Hauck, and Manfred Stähli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4585–4610, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4585-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4585-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Soil moisture information was shown to be valuable for landslide prediction. Soil moisture was simulated at 133 sites in Switzerland, and the temporal variability was compared to the regional occurrence of landslides. We found that simulated soil moisture is a good predictor for landslides, and that the forecast goodness is similar to using in situ measurements. This encourages the use of models for complementing existing soil moisture monitoring networks for regional landslide early warning.
Hong-Yu Xie, Xiao-Wei Jiang, Shu-Cong Tan, Li Wan, Xu-Sheng Wang, Si-Hai Liang, and Yijian Zeng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4243–4257, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4243-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4243-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Freezing-induced groundwater migration and water table decline are widely observed, but quantitative understanding of these processes is lacking. By considering wintertime atmospheric conditions and occurrence of lateral groundwater inflow, a model coupling soil water and groundwater reproduced field observations of soil temperature, soil water content, and groundwater level well. The model results led to a clear understanding of the balance of the water budget during the freezing–thawing cycle.
Pei Zhang, Donghai Zheng, Rogier van der Velde, Jun Wen, Yijian Zeng, Xin Wang, Zuoliang Wang, Jiali Chen, and Zhongbo Su
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3075–3102, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3075-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3075-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reports on the status of the Tibet-Obs and presents a 10-year (2009–2019) surface soil moisture (SM) dataset produced based on in situ measurements taken at a depth of 5 cm collected from the Tibet-Obs. This surface SM dataset includes the original 15 min in situ measurements collected by multiple SM monitoring sites of three networks (i.e. the Maqu, Naqu, and Ngari networks) and the spatially upscaled SM records produced for the Maqu and Shiquanhe networks.
Youri Rothfuss, Maria Quade, Nicolas Brüggemann, Alexander Graf, Harry Vereecken, and Maren Dubbert
Biogeosciences, 18, 3701–3732, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3701-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3701-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The partitioning of evapotranspiration into evaporation from soil and transpiration from plants is crucial for a wide range of parties, from farmers to policymakers. In this work, we focus on a particular partitioning method, based on the stable isotopic analysis of water. In particular, we aim at highlighting the challenges that this method is currently facing and, in light of recent methodological developments, propose ways forward for the isotopic-partitioning community.
Anna B. Harper, Karina E. Williams, Patrick C. McGuire, Maria Carolina Duran Rojas, Debbie Hemming, Anne Verhoef, Chris Huntingford, Lucy Rowland, Toby Marthews, Cleiton Breder Eller, Camilla Mathison, Rodolfo L. B. Nobrega, Nicola Gedney, Pier Luigi Vidale, Fred Otu-Larbi, Divya Pandey, Sebastien Garrigues, Azin Wright, Darren Slevin, Martin G. De Kauwe, Eleanor Blyth, Jonas Ardö, Andrew Black, Damien Bonal, Nina Buchmann, Benoit Burban, Kathrin Fuchs, Agnès de Grandcourt, Ivan Mammarella, Lutz Merbold, Leonardo Montagnani, Yann Nouvellon, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, and Georg Wohlfahrt
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3269–3294, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated 10 representations of soil moisture stress in the JULES land surface model against site observations of GPP and latent heat flux. Increasing the soil depth and plant access to deep soil moisture improved many aspects of the simulations, and we recommend these settings in future work using JULES. In addition, using soil matric potential presents the opportunity to include parameters specific to plant functional type to further improve modeled fluxes.
Cosimo Brogi, Johan A. Huisman, Lutz Weihermüller, Michael Herbst, and Harry Vereecken
SOIL, 7, 125–143, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-125-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-125-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
There is a need in agriculture for detailed soil maps that carry quantitative information. Geophysics-based soil maps have the potential to deliver such products, but their added value has not been fully investigated yet. In this study, we compare the use of a geophysics-based soil map with the use of two commonly available maps as input for crop growth simulations. The geophysics-based product results in better simulations, with improvements that depend on precipitation, soil, and crop type.
Surya Gupta, Tomislav Hengl, Peter Lehmann, Sara Bonetti, and Dani Or
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1593–1612, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1593-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1593-2021, 2021
Martina Botter, Matthias Zeeman, Paolo Burlando, and Simone Fatichi
Biogeosciences, 18, 1917–1939, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1917-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1917-2021, 2021
Yunfei Wang, Yijian Zeng, Lianyu Yu, Peiqi Yang, Christiaan Van der Tol, Qiang Yu, Xiaoliang Lü, Huanjie Cai, and Zhongbo Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1379–1407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1379-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1379-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates photosynthesis and transfer of energy, mass, and momentum in the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum system, via a simplified 1D root growth model. The results indicated that the simulation of land surface fluxes was significantly improved by considering the root water uptake, especially when vegetation was experiencing severe water stress. This finding highlights the importance of enhanced soil heat and moisture transfer in simulating ecosystem functioning.
Simon J. Dadson, Eleanor Blyth, Douglas Clark, Helen Davies, Richard Ellis, Huw Lewis, Toby Marthews, and Ponnambalan Rameshwaran
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-60, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-60, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Flood prediction helps national and regional planning and real-time flood response. In this study we apply and test a new way to make wide area predictions of flooding which can be combined with weather forecasting and climate models to give faster predictions of flooded areas. By simplifying the detailed floodplain topography we can keep track of the fraction of land flooded for hazard mapping purposes. When tested this approach accurately reproduces benchmark datasets for England.
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we were able to significantly improve CLM5 model performance for European cropland sites by adding a winter wheat representation, specific plant parameterizations for important cash crops, and a cover-cropping and crop rotation subroutine to its crop module. Our modifications should be applied in future studies of CLM5 to improve regional yield predictions and to better understand large-scale impacts of agricultural management on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.
Brigitta Szabó, Melanie Weynants, and Tobias K. D. Weber
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 151–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents updated European prediction algorithms (euptf2) to compute soil hydraulic parameters from easily available soil properties. The new algorithms lead to significantly better predictions and provide a built-in prediction uncertainty computation. The influence of predictor variables on predicted soil hydraulic properties is explored and practical guidance on how to use the derived PTFs is provided. A website and an R package facilitate easy application of the updated predictions.
Lianyu Yu, Simone Fatichi, Yijian Zeng, and Zhongbo Su
The Cryosphere, 14, 4653–4673, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4653-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4653-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The role of soil water and heat transfer physics in portraying the function of a cold region ecosystem was investigated. We found that explicitly considering the frozen soil physics and coupled water and heat transfer is important in mimicking soil hydrothermal dynamics. The presence of soil ice can alter the vegetation leaf onset date and deep leakage. Different complexity in representing vadose zone physics does not considerably affect interannual energy, water, and carbon fluxes.
Joost Buitink, Anne M. Swank, Martine van der Ploeg, Naomi E. Smith, Harm-Jan F. Benninga, Frank van der Bolt, Coleen D. U. Carranza, Gerbrand Koren, Rogier van der Velde, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 6021–6031, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6021-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6021-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The amount of water stored in the soil is critical for the productivity of plants. Plant productivity is either limited by the available water or by the available energy. In this study, we infer this transition point by comparing local observations of water stored in the soil with satellite observations of vegetation productivity. We show that the transition point is not constant with soil depth, indicating that plants use water from deeper layers when the soil gets drier.
Conrad Jackisch, Samuel Knoblauch, Theresa Blume, Erwin Zehe, and Sibylle K. Hassler
Biogeosciences, 17, 5787–5808, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5787-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5787-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We developed software to calculate the root water uptake (RWU) of beech tree roots from soil moisture dynamics. We present our approach and compare RWU to measured sap flow in the tree stem. The study relates to two sites that are similar in topography and weather but with contrasting soils. While sap flow is very similar between the two sites, the RWU is different. This suggests that soil characteristics have substantial influence. Our easy-to-implement RWU estimate may help further studies.
Wartini Ng, Budiman Minasny, Wanderson de Sousa Mendes, and José Alexandre Melo Demattê
SOIL, 6, 565–578, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-565-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-565-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The number of samples utilised to create predictive models affected model performance. This research compares the number of samples needed by a deep learning model to outperform the traditional machine learning models using visible near-infrared spectroscopy data for soil properties predictions. The deep learning model was found to outperform machine learning models when the sample size was above 2000.
Lianyu Yu, Yijian Zeng, and Zhongbo Su
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4813–4830, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4813-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4813-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Soil mass and heat transfer processes were represented in three levels of model complexities to understand soil freeze–thaw mechanisms. Results indicate that coupled mass and heat transfer models considerably improved simulations of the soil hydrothermal regime. Vapor flow and thermal effects on water flow are the main mechanisms for the improvements. Given the explicit consideration of airflow, vapor flow and its effects on heat transfer were enhanced during the freeze–thaw transition period.
Cited articles
Abrosimov, K. N., Gerke, K. M., Fomin, D. S., Romanenko, K., and Korost, D. V.: Tomography in Soil Science: From the First Experiments to Modern Methods (A Review), Euras. Soil Sci., 54, 1385–1399, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321090027, 2021.
Acutis, M. and Donatelli, M.: SOILPAR 2.00: software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functions, Eur. J. Agron., 18, 373–377, 2003.
Apers, S., Lannoy, G. de, Baird, A. J., Cobb, A. R., Dargie, G. C., Del Aguila Pasquel, J., Gruber, A., Hastie, A., Hidayat, H., Hirano, T., Hoyt, A. M., Jovani-Sancho, A. J., Katimon, A., Kurnain, A., Koster, R. D., Lampela, M., Mahanama, S., Melling, L., Page, S. E., Reichle, R. H., Taufik, M., Vanderborght, J., and Bechtold, M.: Tropical Peatland Hydrology Simulated With a Global Land Surface Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 14, e2021MS002784, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002784, 2022.
Araya, S. N. and Ghezzehei, T. A.: Using machine learning for prediction of saturated hydraulic conductivity and its sensitivity to soil structural perturbations, Water Resour. Res., 55, 5715–5737, 2019.
Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R., Haney, E. B., and Neitsch, S. L.: SWAT 2012: Input/Output Documentation, Texas Water Resources Institute, https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/149194 (last access: 6 June 2024), 2013.
Ashby, S. F. and Falgout, R. D.: A parallel multigrid preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 124, 145–159, 1996.
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W., Hatfield, J. L., Ruane, A. C., Boote, K. J., Thorburn, P. J., Rötter, R. P., Cammarano, D., Brisson, N., Basso, B., Martre, P., Aggarwal, P. K., Angulo, C., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Challinor, A. J., Doltra, J., Gayler, S., Goldberg, R., Grant, R., Heng, L., Hooker, J., Hunt, L. A., Ingwersen, J., Izaurralde, R. C., Kersebaum, K. C., Müller, C., Naresh Kumar, S., Nendel, C., OLeary, G., Olesen, J. E., Osborne, T. M., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D., Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Steduto, P., Stöckle, C., Stratonovitch, P., Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Travasso, M., Waha, K., Wallach, D., White, J. W., Williams, J. R., and Wolf, J.: Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 827–832, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1916, 2013.
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Martre, P., Rötter, R. P., Lobell, D. B., Cammarano, D., Kimball, B. A., Ottman, M. J., Wall, G. W., White, J. W., Reynolds, M. P., Alderman, P. D., Prasad, P., Aggarwal, P. K., Anothai, J., Basso, B., Biernath, C., Challinor, A. J., Sanctis, G. de, Doltra, J., Fereres, E., Garcia-Vila, M., Gayler, S., Hoogenboom, G., Hunt, L. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Jabloun, M., Jones, C. D., Kersebaum, K. C., Koehler, A.-K., Müller, C., Naresh Kumar, S., Nendel, C., OLeary, G., Olesen, J. E., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Eyshi Rezaei, E., Ruane, A. C., Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Stockle, C., Stratonovitch, P., Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Thorburn, P. J., Waha, K., Wang, E., Wallach, D., Wolf, J., Zhao, Z., and Zhu, Y.: Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 143–147, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2470, 2015.
Assouline, S.: Infiltration into soils: Conceptual approaches and solutions, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1755–1772, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20155, 2013.
Assouline, S. and Or, D.: Conceptual and parametric representation of soil hydraulic properties: A review, Vadose Zone J., 12, vzj2013-07, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2013.07.0121, 2013.
Assouline, S. and Or, D.: The concept of field capacity revisited: Defining intrinsic static and dynamic criteria for soil internal drainage dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 50, 4787–4802, 2014.
Aubertin, M., Mbonimpa, M., Bussière, B., and Chapuis, R. P.: A model to predict the water retention curve from basic geotechnical properties, Can. Geotech. J., 40, 1104–1122, https://doi.org/10.1139/T03-054, 2003.
Bachmann, J., Woche, S. K., Goebel, M.-O., Kirkham, M. B., and Horton, R.: Extended methodology for determining wetting properties of porous media, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1353, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002143, 2003.
Bagnall, D. K., Jones, E. J., Balke, S., Morgan, C., and McBratney, A. B.: An in situ method for quantifying tillage effects on soil structure using multistripe laser triangulation, Geoderma, 380, 114642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114642, 2020.
Bakker, G., van der Ploeg, M., Visser, S., Degre, A., and Nemes, A.: Harmonization, innovation, and standardization of soil hydro-physics properties through international engagement (SOPHIE), Geophys. Res. Abstr., 21, 1–1, 2019.
Baroni, G., Zink, M., Kumar, R., Samaniego, L., and Attinger, S.: Effects of uncertainty in soil properties on simulated hydrological states and fluxes at different spatio-temporal scales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2301–2320, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2301-2017, 2017.
Barros, A., van de Jong Lier, Q., de Holanda Nunes Maia, A., and Vale Scarpare, F.: Pedotransfer functions to estimate water retention parameters of soils in Northeastern Brazil, Revista Brasileira de Cincia do Solo, 37, 379–391, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832013000200009, 2013.
Basile, A., Ciollaro, G., and Coppola, A.: Hysteresis in soil water characteristics as a key to interpreting comparisons of laboratory and field measured hydraulic properties, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1355, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002432, 2003.
Basso, B., Dumont, B., Maestrini, B., Shcherbak, I., Robertson, G. P., Porter, J. R., Smith, P., Paustian, K., Grace, P. R., Asseng, S., Bassu, S., Biernath, C., Boote, K. J., Cammarano, D., de Sanctis, G., Durand, J.-L., Ewert, F., Gayler, S., Hyndman, D. W., Kent, J., Martre, P., Nendel, C., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D., Ruane, A. C., Sharp, J., Thorburn, P. J., Hatfield, J. L., Jones, J. W., and Rosenzweig, C.: Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Feedbacks on Crop Yields under Climate Change, Agric. Environ. Lett., 3, 180026, https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2018.05.0026, 2018.
Bassu, S., Brisson, N., Durand, J.-L., Boote, K., Lizaso, J., Jones, J. W., Rosenzweig, C., Ruane, A. C., Adam, M., Baron, C., Basso, B., Biernath, C., Boogaard, H., Conijn, S., Corbeels, M., Deryng, D., Sanctis, G. de, Gayler, S., Grassini, P., Hatfield, J., Hoek, S., Izaurralde, C., Jongschaap, R., Kemanian, A. R., Kersebaum, K. C., Kim, S.-H., Kumar, N. S., Makowski, D., Müller, C., Nendel, C., Priesack, E., Pravia, M. V., Sau, F., Shcherbak, I., Tao, F., Teixeira, E., Timlin, D., and Waha, K.: How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 2301–2320, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12520, 2014.
Batjes, N. H., Ribeiro, E., and van Oostrum, A.: Standardised soil profile data to support global mapping and modelling (WoSIS snapshot 2019), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 299–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-299-2020, 2020.
Bear, J.: Dynamics of fluids in porous media, Courier Corporation, ISBN 978-0486656755, 1988.
Beare, M. H., Cabrera, M. L., Hendrix, P. F., and Coleman, D.: Aggregate protected and unprotected organic matter pools in conventional and no-tillage soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 787795, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030021x, 1994.
Bechtold, M., Lannoy, G. de, Koster, R. D., Reichle, R. H., Mahanama, S. P., Bleuten, W., Bourgault, M. A., Brmmer, C., Burdun, I., Desai, A. R., Devito, K., Grnwald, T., Grygoruk, M., Humphreys, E. R., Klatt, J., Kurbatova, J., Lohila, A., Munir, T. M., Nilsson, M. B., Price, J. S., Rhl, M., Schneider, A., and Tiemeyer, B.: PEAT-CLSM: A Specific Treatment of Peatland Hydrology in the NASA Catchment Land Surface Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 2130–2162, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001574, 2019.
Bellamy, P. H., Loveland, P. J., Bradley, R. I., Lark, R. M., and Kirk, G.: Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003, Nature, 437, 245–247, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04038, 2005.
Bens, O., Wahl, N. A., Fischer, H., and Hüttl, R. F.: Water infiltration and hydraulic conductivity in sandy cambisols: impacts of forest transformation on soil hydrological properties, Eur. J. Forest Res., 126, 101–109, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0133-7, 2007.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Beven, K.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007, 2006.
Bieganowski, A., Ryżk, M., Sochan, A., Barna, G., Hernádi, H., Beczek, M., Polakowski, C., and Makó, A.: Laser diffractometry in the measurements of soil and sediment particle size distribution, in: Advances in Agronomy, Elsevier, 215–279, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.04.003, 2018.
Blanchy, G., Albrecht, L., Bragato, G., Garré, S., Jarvis, N., and Koestel, J.: Impacts of soil management and climate on saturated and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity: analyses of the Open Tension-disk Infiltrometer Meta-database (OTIM), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2703–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2703-2023, 2023.
Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251–290, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090305, 1995.
Bodner, G., Scholl, P., and Loiskandl, W.and Kaul, H.-P.: Environmental and management influences on temporal variability of near saturated soil hydraulic properties, Geoderma, 204, 120–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.015, 2013.
Bonetti, S., Wei, Z., and Or, D.: A framework for quantifying hydrologic effects of soil structure across scales, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 107, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00180-0, 2021.
Bormann, H. and Klaassen, K.: Seasonal and land use dependent variability of soil hydraulic and soil hydrological properties of two Northern German soils, Geoderma, 145, 295–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.03.017, 2008.
Bottinelli, N., Zhou, H., Capowiez, Y., Zhang, Z. B., Qiu, J., Jouquet, P., and Peng, X. H.: Earthworm burrowing activity of two non-Lumbricidae earthworm species incubated in soils with contrasting organic carbon content (Vertisol vs. Ultisol), Biol. Fert. Soils, 53, 951–955, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1235-8, 2017.
Botula, Y.-D., Nemes, A., Mafuka, P., van Ranst, E., and Cornelis, W. M.: Prediction of Water Retention of Soils from the Humid Tropics by the Nonparametric k-Nearest Neighbor Approach, Vadose Zone J., 12, vzj2012.0123, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0123, 2013.
Bouma, J.: Effect of Soil Structure, Tillage, and Aggregation upon Soil Hydraulic Properties, CRC Press, ISBN 9781003070122, 2000.
Bowers, S. and Hanks, R.: Reflection of radiant energy form soil, Soil Sci., 100, 130–138, https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196508000-00009, 1965.
Brandhorst, N., Erdal, D., and Neuweiler, I.: Coupling saturated and unsaturated flow: comparing the iterative and the non-iterative approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4041–4059, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4041-2021, 2021.
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T.: Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrology Papers, Colorado State University, 3, 1–27, https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/10217/61288/HydrologyPapers_n3.pdf (last access: 10 June 2024), 1964.
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T.: Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow, J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 92, 61–88, 1966.
Brunetti, G., Šimùnek, J., Bogena, H., Baatz, R., Huisman, J. A., Dahlke, H., and Vereecken, H.: On the Information Content of Cosmic-Ray Neutron Data in the Inverse Estimation of Soil Hydraulic Properties, Vadose Zone J., 18, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.06.0123, 2019.
Buchter, B., Berli, M., and Weisskopf, P.: Interlaboratory comparison of soil physical parameters, Environment Agriscope Science, https://ira.agroscope.ch/en-US/publication/34807 (last access: 10 June 2024), 2015.
Cale, W. G., Oneill, R. V., and Gardner, R. H.: Aggregation Error in Non-Linear Ecological Models, J. Theor. Biol., 100, 539–550, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(83)90446-0, 1983.
Campbell, G. S.: A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data, Soil Sci., 117, 311–314, 1974.
Carsel, R. F. and Parrish, R. S.: Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics, Water Resour. Res., 24, 755–769, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i005p00755, 1988.
Chavez Rodriguez, L., González-Nicolás, A., Ingalls, B., Streck, T., Nowak, W., Xiao, S., and Pagel, H.: Optimal design of experiments to improve the characterisation of atrazine degradation pathways in soil, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 73, e13211, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13211, 2022.
Chen, K. and Chen, H.: Generalized hydraulic conductivity model for capillary and adsorbed film flow, Hydrogeol. J., 28, 2259–2274, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02175-1, 2020.
Chen, X., Ren, J., Wang, D., Lyu, Y., and Zhang, H.: A generalized strength reduction concept and its applications to geotechnical stability analysis, Geotech. Geol. Eng., 37, 2409–2424, 2019.
Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., Bierkens, M. F., Fogg, G. E., Maxwell, R. M., Hill, M. C., Hendricks Fransen, H.-J., Verhoef, A., van Loon, A. F., Sulis, M., and Abesser, C.: Global groundwater modeling and monitoring: Opportunities and challenges, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029500, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029500, 2021.
Constantin, J., Raynal, H., Casellas, E., Hoffmann, H., Bindi, M., Doro, L., Eckersten, H., Gaiser, T., Grosz, B., Haas, E., Kersebaum, K.-C., Klatt, S., Kuhnert, M., Lewan, E., Maharjan, G. R., Moriondo, M., Nendel, C., Roggero, P. P., Specka, X., Trombi, G., Villa, A., Wang, E., Weihermüller, L., Yeluripati, J., Zhao, Z., Ewert, F., and Bergez, J.-E.: Management and spatial resolution effects on yield and water balance at regional scale in crop models, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 275, 184–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.013, 2019.
Cornelis, W. M., Khlosi, M., Hartmann, R., van Meirvenne, M., and de Vos, B.: Comparison of Unimodal Analytical Expressions for the Soil-Water Retention Curve, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 1902–1911, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0238, 2005.
Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., and Ginn, T. R.: A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils, Water Resour. Res., 20, 683–690, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00682, 1984.
Cresswell, H. P., Green, T. W., and Mckenzie, N. J.: The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 41–49, https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ2006.0182, 2008.
Dai, Y., Shangguan, W., Wei, N., Xin, Q., Yuan, H., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Lu, X., Wang, D., and Yan, F.: A review of the global soil property maps for Earth system models, SOIL, 5, 137–158, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-137-2019, 2019.
Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C. (Eds.): Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4 – Physical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, ISBN 978-0-891-18893-3, 2002.
Dane, J. H. and Wierenga, P. J.: Effect of hysteresis on the prediction of infiltration, redistribution and drainage of water in a layered soil, J. Hydrol., 25, 229–242, 1975.
Deb, S. K. and Shukla, M. K.: Variability of hydraulic conductivity due to multiple factors, Am. J. Environ. Sci., 8, 489–502, https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2012.489.502, 2012.
Dexter, A. R., Czyż, E., Richard, G., and Reszkowska, A.: A user-friendly water retention function that takes account of the textural and structural pore spaces in soil, Geoderma, 143, 243–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.010, 2008.
Diamantopoulos, E. and Durner, W.: Dynamic Nonequilibrium of Water Flow in Porous Media: A Review, Vadose Zone J., 11, vzj2011.0197, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0197, 2012.
Diamantopoulos, E., Iden, S. C., and Durner, W.: Inverse modeling of dynamic nonequilibrium in water flow with an effective approach, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010717, 2012.
Diamantopoulos, E., Durner, W., Reszkowska, A., and Bachmann, J.: Effect of soil water repellency on soil hydraulic properties estimated under dynamic conditions, J. Hydrol., 486, 175–186, 2013.
Diamantopoulos, E., Durner, W., Iden, S. C., Weller, U., and Vogel, H.-J.: Modeling dynamic non-equilibrium water flow observations under various boundary conditions, J. Hydrol., 529, 1851–1858, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.032, 2015.
Diamantopoulos, E., Simunek, J., and Weber, T. K. D.: Implementation of the Brunswick model system into the Hydrus software suite, Vadose Zone J., https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20326, 2024.
Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., McClean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., and Lautenbach, S.: Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance, Ecography, 36, 27–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x, 2013.
Du, C.: Comparison of the performance of 22 models describing soil water retention curves from saturation to oven dryness, Vadose Zone J., 19, e20072, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20072, 2020.
Du, E., Di Vittorio, A., and Collins, W. D.: Evaluation of hydrologic components of community land model 4 and bias identification, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 48, 5–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.013, 2016.
Durand, J.-L., Delusca, K., Boote, K., Lizaso, J., Manderscheid, R., Weigel, H. J., Ruane, A. C., Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J., Ahuja, L., Anapalli, S., Basso, B., Baron, C., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Deryng, D., Ewert, F., Gaiser, T., Gayler, S., Heinlein, F., Kersebaum, K. C., Kim, S.-H., Müller, C., Nendel, C., Olioso, A., Priesack, E., Villegas, J. R., Ripoche, D., Rötter, R. P., Seidel, S. I., Srivastava, A., Tao, F., Timlin, D., Twine, T., Wang, E., Webber, H., and Zhao, Z.: How accurately do maize crop models simulate the interactions of atmospheric CO2 concentration levels with limited water supply on water use and yield?, Eur. J. Agron., 100, 67–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.01.002, 2018.
Durner, W.: Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure, Water Resour. Res., 30, 211–223, https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR0267, 1994.
Durner, W. and Iden, S. C.: The improved integral suspension pressure method (ISP+) for precise particle size analysis of soil and sedimentary materials, Soil Till. Res., 213, 105086, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105086, 2021.
Durner, W., Jansen, U., and Iden, S. C.: Effective hydraulic properties of layered soils at the lysimeter scale determined by inverse modelling, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 114–124, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00972.x, 2007.
Eck, D. V., Hirmas, D. R., and Gimenez, D.: Quantifying Soil Structure from Field Excavation Walls using Multistripe Laser Triangulation Scanning, Soil Sci. Soc. America J., 77, 1319–1328, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0421, 2013.
Eppes, M. C., Bierma, R., Vinson, D., and Pazzaglia, F.: A soil chronosequence study of the Reno valley, Italy: Insights into the relative role of climate versus anthropogenic forcing on hillslope processes during the mid-Holocene, Geoderma, 147, 97–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.07.011, 2008.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
Fan, L., Lehmann, P., Zheng, C., and Or, D.: Vegetation-Promoted Soil Structure Inhibits Hydrologic Landslide Triggering and Alters Carbon Fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100389, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100389, 2022.
Farkas, C., Gyuricza, C., and Birkás, M.: Seasonal changes of hydraulic properties of a Chromic Luvisol under different soil management, Biologia, 61, S344–S348, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0186-6, 2006.
Fatichi, S., Or, D., Walko, R., Vereecken, H., Young, M. H., Ghezzehei, T. A., Hengl, T., Kollet, S., Agam, N., and Avissar, R.: Soil structure is an important omission in Earth System Models, Nat. Commun., 11, 522, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14411-z, 2020.
Faybishenko, B. A.: Hydraulic behavior of quasi-saturated soils in the presence of entrapped air: Laboratory experiments, Water Resour. Res., 31, 2421–2435, https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR01654, 1995.
Finkel, M., Baur, A., Weber, T. K. D., Osenbrück, K., Rügner, H., Leven, C., Schwientek, M., Schlögl, J., Hahn, U., Streck, T., Cirpka, O. A., Walter, T., and Grathwohl, P.: Managing collaborative research data for integrated, interdisciplinary environmental research, Earth Sci. Inform., 13, 641–654, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00441-0, 2020.
Fisher, R. A. and Koven, C. D.: Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems, J. Adv. Model Earth Syst., 12, 641–654, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001453, 2020.
Fodor, N., Sándor, R., Orfanus, T., Lichner, L., and Rajkai, K.: Evaluation method dependency of measured saturated hydraulic conductivity, Geoderma, 165, 60–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.004, 2011.
Francos, N., Romano, N., Nasta, P., Zeng, Y., Szabó, B., Manfreda, S., Ciraolo, G., Mészáros, J., Zhuang, R., Su, B., and Ben-Dor, E.: Mapping water infiltration rate using ground and UAV hyperspectral data: A case study of Alento, Italy, Remote Sens., 13, 2606, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132606, 2021.
Fu, Z., Hu, W., Beare, M., Thomas, S., Carrick, S., Dando, J., Langer, S., Müller, K., Baird, D., and Lilburne, L.: Land use effects on soil hydraulic properties and the contribution of soil organic carbon, J. Hydrol., 602, 126741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126741, 2021.
Fuentes-Guevara, M. D., Armindo, R. A., Timm, L. C., and Nemes, A.: Data correlation structure controls pedotransfer function performance, J. Hydrol., 614, 128540, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128540, 2022.
Funk, M.: Hysteretic moisture properties of porous materials: Part I: Thermodynamics, J. Build. Phys., 38, 6–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/1744259113496367, 2014.
Funk, M.: Hysteretic moisture properties of porous materials: Part II. Condensation potentials, J. Build. Phys., 39, 207–241, https://doi.org/10.1177/1744259114527809, 2015.
Gackiewicz, B., Lamorski, K., and Slawinski, C.: Saturated water conductivity estimation based on X-ray CT images-evaluation of the impact of thresholding errors, Int. Agrophys., 33, 49–60, https://doi.org/10.31545/intagr/104376, 2019.
Gardner, W. R.: Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table, Soil Sci., 85, 228–232, 1958.
Gatzke, S. E., Beaudette, D. E., Ficklin, D. L., Luo, Y., and OGeen, A. T., and Zhang, M.: Aggregation strategies for SSURGO Data: Effects on SWAT soil inputs and hydrologic outputs, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 75, 1908–1921, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0418, 2011.
Gebauer, A., Ellinger, M., Brito Gomez, V. M., and Ließ, M.: Development of pedotransfer functions for water retention in tropical mountain soil landscapes: spotlight on parameter tuning in machine learning, SOIL, 6, 215–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-215-2020, 2020.
Gee, G. W., Ward, A. L., Zhang, Z. F., Campbell, G. S., and Mathison, J.: The influence of hydraulic nonequilibrium on pressure plate data, Vadose Zone J., 1, 172–178, https://doi.org/10.2113/1.1.172, 2002.
Gelman, A., Rubin, D. B., Carlin, J. B., and Stern, H. S.: Bayesian data analysis, in: 3rd Edn., Texts in statistical science, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, London, New York, etc., 667 pp., ISBN 1439840954, 2013.
Gerke, H. H. and van Genuchten, M. T.: A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media, Water Resour. Res., 29, 305–319, https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02339, 1993.
Gerke, H. H., Vogel, H.-J., Weber, T. K., van der Meij, W. M., and Scholten, T.: 3–4D soil model as challenge for future soil research: Quantitative soil modeling based on the solid phase, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 185, 720–744, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202200239, 2022.
Ghanbarian, B., Taslimitehrani, V., and Pachepsky, Y. A.: Accuracy of sample dimension-dependent pedotransfer functions in estimation of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, Catena, 149, 374–380, 2017.
Gharari, S., Shafiei, M., Hrachowitz, M., Kumar, R., Fenicia, F., Gupta, H. V., and Savenije, H. H. G.: A constraint-based search algorithm for parameter identification of environmental models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4861–4870, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4861-2014, 2014.
Gilding, B. H.: Mathematical Modelling Of Saturated And Unsaturated Groundwater Flow, in: Flow and Transport in Porous Media, 8–26 August 1988, Beijing, China, 1–166, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814368438_0001, 1992.
Gimbel, K. F., Puhlmann, H., and Weiler, M.: Does drought alter hydrological functions in forest soils?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1301–1317, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1301-2016, 2016.
Gonzalez-Sosa, E., Braud, I., Thony, J.-L., Vauclin, M., Bessemoulin, P., and Calvet, J.-C.: Modelling heat and water exchanges of fallow land covered with plant-residue mulch, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 97, 151–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00081-7, 1999.
Groh, J., Diamantopoulos, E., Duan, X., Ewert, F., Herbst, M., Holbak, M., Kamali, B., Kersebaum, K.-C., Kuhnert, M., Lischeid, G., Nendel, C., Priesack, E., Steidl, J., Sommer, M., Pütz, T., Vereecken, H., Wallor, E., Weber, T., Wegehenkel, M., Weihermüller, L., and Gerke, H. H.: Crop growth and soil water fluxes at erosion-affected arable sites: Using weighing lysimeter data for model intercomparison, Vadose Zone J., 19, e20058, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20058, 2020.
Groh, J., Diamantopoulos, E., Duan, X., Ewert, F., Heinlein, F., Herbst, M., Holbak, M., Kamali, B., Kersebaum, K.-C., Kuhnert, M., Nendel, C., Priesack, E., Steidl, J., Sommer, M., Pütz, T., Vanderborght, J., Vereecken, H., Wallor, E., Weber, T. K. D., Wegehenkel, M., Weihermüller, L., and Gerke, H. H.: Same soil, different climate: Crop model intercomparison on translocated lysimeters, Vadose Zone J., 21, e20202, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20202, 2022.
Grunwald, S., Chaikaew, P., Cao, B., Xiong, X., Vasques, G. M., Kim, J., Ross, C. W., Clingensmith, C. M., Xu, Y., and Gavilan, C.: The Meta Soil Model – An Integrative Framework to Model Soil Carbon Across Various Ecosystems and Scales, in: Digital Soil Mapping Across Paradigms, Scales and Boundaries, edited by: Zhang, G.-L., Brus, D., Liu, F., Song, X.-D., and Lagacherie, P., Springer Singapore, Singapore, 165–179, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0415-5_14, 2016.
Guber, A. K., Pachepsky, Y. A., Genuchten, M. T., Rawls, W. J., Simunek, J., Jacques, D., Nicholson, T. J., and Cady, R. E.: Field-Scale Water Flow Simulations Using Ensembles of Pedotransfer Functions for Soil Water Retention, Vadose Zone J., 5, 234–247, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0111, 2006.
Gubiani, P. I., Reichert, J. M., Campbell, C., Reinert, D. J., and Gelain, N. S.: Assessing Errors and Accuracy in Dew-Point Potentiometer and Pressure Plate Extractor Meaurements, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, 19–24, https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ2012.0024, 2013.
Gudmundsson, L. and Cuntz, M.: Soil Parameter Model Intercomparison Project (SP-MIP): Assessing the Influence of Soil Parameters on the Variability of Land Surface Models, edited by: Lal, R., Kimble, J., and Stewart, B. A., GEWEX-ISMC SoilWat workshop, Leipzig, 2016.
Guillaume, B., Aroui Boukbida, H., Bakker, G., Bieganowski, A., Brostaux, Y., Cornelis, W., Durner, W., Hartmann, C., Iversen, B. V., Javaux, M., Ingwersen, J., Lamorski, K., Lamparter, A., Makó, A., Mingot Soriano, A. M., Messing, I., Nemes, A., Pomes-Bordedebat, A., van der Ploeg, M., Weber, T. K. D., Weihermüller, L., Wellens, J., and Degré, A.: Reproducibility of the wet part of the soil water retention curve: a European interlaboratory comparison, SOIL, 9, 365–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, 2023.
Gunarathna, M., Sakai, K., Nakandakari, T., Momii, K., Kumari, M., and Amarasekara, M.: Pedotransfer functions to estimate hydraulic properties of tropical Sri Lankan soils, Soil Till. Res., 190, 109–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.02.009, 2019.
Gupta, S., Lehmann, P., Bonetti, S., Papritz, A., and Or, D.: Global Prediction of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Using Random Forest in a Covariate-Based GeoTransfer Function (CoGTF) Framework, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 13, e2020MS002242, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002242, 2021a.
Gupta, S., Hengl, T., Lehmann, P., Bonetti, S., and Or, D.: SoilKsatDB: global database of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity measurements for geoscience applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1593–1612, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1593-2021, 2021b.
Gupta, S., Papritz, A., Lehmann, P., Hengl, T., Bonetti, S., and Or, D.: Global Mapping of Soil Water Characteristics Parameters – Fusing Curated Data with Machine Learning and Environmental Covariates, Remote Sens., 14, 1947, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081947, 2022.
Gwo, J. P., Jardine, P. M., Wilson, G. V., and Yeh, G. T.: Using a Multiregion Model to Study the Effects of Advective and Diffusive Mass Transfer on Local Physical Nonequilibrium and Solute Mobility in a Structured Soil, Water Resour. Res., 32, 561–570, https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR03397, 1996.
Hadas, A.: Long-term Tillage Practice Effects on Soil Aggregation Modes and Strength, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 191–197, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100010040x, 1987.
Haines, W. B.: Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties, and the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith, J. Agricult. Sci., 20, 97–116, 1930.
Halbritter, A., Boeck, H. J. de, Eycott, A. E., Reinsch, S., Robinson, D. A., Vicca, S., Berauer, B., Christiansen, C. T., Estiarte, M., Grünzweig, J. M., Gya, R., Hansen, K., Jentsch, A., Lee, H., Linder, S., Marshall, J., Peñuelas, J., Kappel S.I., Stuart-Haëntjens, E., Wilfahrt, P., the ClimMani Working Group, and Vandvik, V.: The handbook for standardized field and laboratory measurements in terrestrial climate change experiments and observational studies (ClimEx), Meth. Ecol. Evol., 11, 22–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13331, 2020.
Hannes, M., Wollschläger, U., Wöhling, T., and Vogel, H.-J.: Revisiting hydraulic hysteresis based on long-term monitoring of hydraulic states in lysimeters, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3847–3865, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018319, 2016.
Hassanizadeh, S. M., Celia, M. A., and Dahle, H. K.: Dynamic Effect in the Capillary Pressure-Saturation Relationship and its Impacts on Unsaturated Flow, Vadose Zone J., 1, 38–57, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2002.3800, 2002.
Hedley, C. B., Yule, I. J., Eastwood, C. R., Shepherd, T. G., and Arnold, G.: Rapid identification of soil textural and management zones using electromagnetic induction sensing of soils, Soil Res., 42, 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR03149, 2004.
Heil, K. and Schmidhalter, U.: Characterisation of soil texture variability using the apparent soil electrical conductivity at a highly variable site, Comput. Geosci., 39, 98–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.06.017, 2012.
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotiæ, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and Kempen, B.: SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning, PLoS ONE, 12, e0169748, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017.
Hillel, D.: Environmental Soil Physics: Fundamentals, Applications, and Environmental Considerations, Elsevier professional, s.l., 771 pp., https://shop.elsevier.com/books/environmental-soil-physics/hillel/978-0-12-348525-0 (last access: 10 June 2024), 1998.
Hirmas, D. and Gimenez, D.: A Geometric Equation for Representing Morphological Field Information in Horizons with Compound Structure, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 81, 863–867, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.12.0396n, 2017.
Hirmas, D. R., Gimenez, D., Mome Filho, E. A., Patterson, M., Drager, K., Platt, B. F., and Eck, D. V.: Quantifying soil structure and porosity using three-dimensional laser scanning, in: Digital Soil Morphometrics, Progress in Soil Science, edited by: Hartemink, A. E. and Minasny, B., Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28295-4_2, 2016.
Hirmas, D. R., Gimnez, D., Nemes, A., Kerry, R., Brunsell, N. A., and Wilson, C. J.: Climate-induced changes in continental-scale soil macroporosity may intensify water cycle, Nature, 561, 100–103, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0463-x, 2018.
Hodde, W., Sesmero, J., Gramig, B., Vyn, T., and Doering, O.: The Predicted Effect of Projected Climate Change on the Economics of Conservation Tillage, Agron. J., 111, 3130–3139, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.01.0045, 2019.
Hodnett, M. G. and Tomasella, J.: Marked differences between van Genuchten soil water-retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: a new water-retention pedo-transfer functions developed for tropical soils, Geoderma, 108, 155–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00105-2, 2002.
Hopmans, J. W. and Dane, J. H.: Temperature dependence of soil water retention curves, Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 50, 562–567, https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ1986.03615995005000030004X, 1986.
Hopmans, J. W., Simunek, J., Romano, N., and Durner, W.: Inverse methods, in: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4, SSSA Book Series No. 5, SSA, Madison, WI, 963–1008, 2002.
Horn, R., Taubner, H., Wuttke, M., and Baumgartl, T.: Soil physical properties related to soil structure, Soil Till. Res., 30, 187–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(94)90005-1, 1994.
Huang, H.-C., Tan, Y.-C., Liu, C.-W., and Chen, C.-H.: A novel hysteresis model in unsaturated soil, Hydrol. Process., 19, 1653–1665, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5594, 2005.
Hutson, J. L. and Cass, A.: A retentivity function for use in soil–water simulation models, J. Soil Sci., 38, 105–113, 1987.
Iiyama, M., Neufeldt, H., Njenga, M., Derero, A., Ndegwa, G. M., Mukuralinda, A., Dobie, P., Jamnadass, R., and Mowo, J.: Conceptual analysis: the charcoal-agriculture nexus to understand the socio-ecological contexts underlying varied sustainability outcomes in African landscapes, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5, 31, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00031, 2017.
Ippisch, O., Vogel, H.-J., and Bastian, P.: Validity limits for the van Genuchten–Mualem model and implications for parameter estimation and numerical simulation, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 1780–1789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.12.011, 2006.
Ito, A. and Wagai, R.: Global distribution of clay-size minerals on land surface for biogeochemical and climatological studies, Scientific Data, 4, 1–11, 2017.
Jackisch, C., Hassler, S. K., Hohenbrink, T. L., Blume, T., Laudon, H., McMillan, H., Saco, P., and van Schaik, L.: Preface: Linking landscape organisation and hydrological functioning: from hypotheses and observations to concepts, models and understanding, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5277–5285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, 2021.
Jaenicke, J., Wösten, H., Budiman, A., and Siegert, F.: Planning hydrological restoration of peatlands in Indonesia to mitigate carbon https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9214-5, 2010.
Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Messing, I., Moeys, J., and Lindahl, A.: Influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5185–5195, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5185-2013, 2013.
Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., and Larsbo, M.: Understanding Preferential Flow in the Vadose Zone: Recent Advances and Future Prospects, Vadose Zone J., 15, vzj2016.09.0075, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.09.0075, 2016.
Jarvis, N., Larsbo, M., Lewan, E., and Garré, S.: Improved descriptions of soil hydrology in crop models: The elephant in the room?, Agricult. Syst., 202, 103477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103477, 2022.
Jarvis, N. J.: A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 523–546, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00915.x, 2007.
Javaux, M. and Vanclooster, M.: Three-dimensional structure characterisation and transient flow modelling of a variably saturated heterogeneous monolith, J. Hydrol., 327, 516–524, 2006.
Jenny, H.: Factors of soil formation: A system of quantitative pedology, McGraw Hill, New York, ISBN 978-0486681283, 1941.
Jha, A., Bonetti, S., Smith, A. P., Souza, R., and Calabrese, S.: Linking soil structure, hydraulic properties, and organic carbon dynamics: A holistic framework to study the impact of climate change and land management, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 128, e2023JG007389, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007389, 2023.
Jorda, H., Bechtold, M., Jarvis, N., and Koestel, J.: Using boosted regression trees to explore key factors controlling saturated and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 744–756, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12249, 2015.
Jülich, S., Kreiselmeier, J., Scheibler, S., Petzold, R., Schwärzel, K., and Feger, K. H.: Hydraulic Properties of Forest Soils with Stagnic Conditions, Forests, 12, 1113, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081113, 2021.
Keller, T. and Or, D.: Farm vehicles approaching weights of sauropods exceed safe mechanical limits for soil functioning, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, e2117699119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117699119, 2022.
Kimball, B. A., Boote, K. J., Hatfield, J. L., Ahuja, L. R., Stockle, C., Archontoulis, S., Baron, C., Basso, B., Bertuzzi, P., Constantin, J., Deryng, D., Dumont, B., Durand, J.-L., Ewert, F., Gaiser, T., Gayler, S., Hoffmann, M. P., Jiang, Q., Kim, S.-H., Lizaso, J., Moulin, S., Nendel, C., Parker, P., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Qi, Z., Srivastava, A., Stella, T., Tao, F., Thorp, K. R., Timlin, D., Twine, T. E., Webber, H., Willaume, M., and Williams, K.: Simulation of maize evapotranspiration: An inter-comparison among 29 maize models, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 271, 264–284, 2019.
Klute, A. and Dirksen, C.: Water retention: laboratory methods. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 – physical and mineralogical methods, (methodsofsoilan1), Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c26, 1986.
Koestel, J., Dathe, A., Skaggs, T. H., Klakegg, O., Ahmad, M. A., Babko, M., Giménez, D., Farkas, C., Nemes, A., and Jarvis, N.: Estimating the permeability of naturally structured soil from percolation theory and pore space characteristics imaged by X-ray, Water Resour. Res., 54, 9255–9263, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023609, 2018.
Koestel, J., Larsbo, M., and Jarvis, N.: Scale and REV analyses for porosity and pore connectivity measures in undisturbed soil, Geoderma, 366, 114206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114206, 2020.
Koestel, J., Fukumasu, J., Garland, G., Larsbo, M., and Svensson, D. N.: Approaches to delineate aggregates in intact soil using X-ray imaging, Geoderma, 402, 115360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115360, 2021.
Kool, J. B. and Parker, J. C.: Development and evaluation of closed-form expressions for hysteretic soil hydraulic properties, Water Resour. Res., 23, 105–114, 1987.
Koop, A. N., Hirmas, D. R., Sullivan, P. L., and Mohammed, A. K.: A generalizable index of soil development, Geoderma, 360, 113898, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113898, 2020.
Kroes, J. G., van Dam, J. C., Bartholomeus, R. P., Groenendijk, P., Heinen, M., Hendriks, R. F. A., Mulder, H. M., Supit, I., and van Walsum, P. E. V.: SWAP version 4, Wageningen Environmental Research report, No. 2780, Wageningen Environmental Research, https://doi.org/10.18174/416321, 2017.
Kuffour, B. N. O., Engdahl, N. B., Woodward, C. S., Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., and Maxwell, R. M.: Simulating coupled surface-subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities applications and ongoing development of an open-source massively parallel integrated hydrologic model, Geoscientific Model Development, 13, 1373–1397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020, 2020.
Lagacherie, P., Arrouays, D., Bourennane, H., Gomez, C., and Nkuba-Kasanda, L.: Analysing the impact of soil spatial sampling on the performances of Digital Soil Mapping models and their evaluation: A numerical experiment on Quantile Random Forest using clay contents obtained from Vis-NIR-SWIR hyperspectral imagery, Geoderma, 375, 114503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114503, 2020.
Lal, R. and Shukla, M. K.: Principles of soil physics, CRC Press, ISBN 978-0824753245, 2013.
Lassabatère, L., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Soria Ugalde, J. M., Cuenca, R., Braud, I., and Haverkamp, R.: Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer Parameters through Infiltration Experiments-BEST, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 521–532, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0026, 2006.
Lehmann, P., Assouline, S., and Or, D.: Characteristic lengths affecting evaporative drying of porous media, Phys. Rev. E, 77, 56309, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.056309, 2008.
Lehmann, P., Bickel, S., Wei, Z., and Or, D.: Physical Constraints for Improved Soil Hydraulic Parameter Estimation by Pedotransfer Functions, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025963, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025963, 2020.
Lehmann, P., Leshchinsky, B., Gupta, S., Mirus, B. B., Bickel, S., Lu, N., and Or, D.: Clays are not created equal: How clay mineral type affects soil parameterization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095311, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095311, 2021.
Leij, F. J.: The UNSODA unsaturated soil hydraulic database: user's manual, 96, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/30003HA3.PDF?Dockey=30003HA3.PDF (last access: 10 July 2024), 1996.
Letey, J.: The study of soil structure – Science or art, Soil Res., 29, 699–707, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910699, 1991.
Letts, M. G., Roulet, N. T., Comer, N. T., Skarupa, M. R., and Verseghy, D. L.: Parametrization of peatland hydraulic properties for the Canadian land surface scheme, Atmos.-Ocean, 38, 141–160, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2000.9649643, 2000.
Lim, H., Yang, H., Chun, K. W., and and Choi, H. T.: Development of pedo-transfer functions for the saturated hydraulic conductivity of forest soil in south Korea considering forest stand and site characteristics, Water, 12, 2217, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082217, 2020.
Lin, H.: Hydropedology: Bridging Disciplines, Scales, and Data, Vadose Zone J., 2, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2003.1000, 2003.
Lin, H. S., McInnes, K. J., Wilding, L. P., and Hallmark, C. T.: Effects of soil morphology on hydraulic properties: II. Hydraulic pedotransfer functions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 55–961, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.634955x, 1999.
Liu, H. and Lennartz, B.: Hydraulic properties of peat soils along a bulk density gradient – A meta study, Hydrol. Process., 33, 101–114, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13314, 2019.
Liu, H., Price, J., Rezanezhad, F., and Lennartz, B.: Centennial-Scale Shifts in Hydrophysical Properties of Peat Induced by Drainage, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027538, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027538, 2020.
Luckner, L.: Migration processes in the soil and groundwater zone (1991), CRC Press, ISBN 978-0873713023, 2017.
Malone, B. P., Jha, S. K., Minasny, B., and McBratney, A. B.: Comparing regression-based digital soil mapping and multiple-point geostatistics for the spatial extrapolation of soil data, Geoderma, 262, 243–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.037, 2016.
Marthews, T. R., Quesada, C. A., Galbraith, D. R., Malhi, Y., Mullins, C. E., Hodnett, M. G., and Dharssi, I.: High-resolution hydraulic parameter maps for surface soils in tropical South America, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 711–723, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-711-2014, 2014.
Mascaro, G., Vivoni, E. R., and Méndez-Barroso, L. A.: Hyperresolution hydrologic modeling in a regional watershed and its interpretation using empirical orthogonal functions, Adv. Water Resour., 83, 190–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.023, 2015.
McCarter, C. P., Ketcheson, S., Weber, T. K., Whittington, P., Scarlett, S., and Price, J.: Modified Technique for Measuring Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Sphagnum Moss and Peat, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 81, 747–757, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0006, 2017.
McCarter, C. P. R. and Price, J. S.: Ecohydrology of Sphagnum moss hummocks: mechanisms of capitula water supply and simulated effects of evaporation, Ecohydrology, 7, 33–44, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1313, 2012.
McNeill, S. J., Lilburne, L. R., Carrick, S., Webb, T. H., and Cuthill, T.: Pedotransfer functions for the soil water characteristics of New Zealand soils using S-map information, Geoderma, 326, 96–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.011, 2018.
Messing, I. and Jarvis, N. J.: Temporal variation in the hydraulic conductivity of a tilled clay soil as measured by tension infiltrometers, J. Soil Sci., 44, 11–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb00430.x, 1993.
Meurer, K., Barron, J., Chenu, C., Coucheney, E., Fielding, M., Hallett, P., Herrmann, A. M., Keller, T., Koestel, J., Larsbo, M., and Lewan, E.: A framework for modelling soil structure dynamics induced by biological activity, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 5382–5403, 2020a.
Meurer, K. H. E., Chenu, C., Coucheney, E., Herrmann, A. M., Keller, T., Kätterer, T., Nimblad Svensson, D., and Jarvis, N.: Modelling dynamic interactions between soil structure and the storage and turnover of soil organic matter, Biogeosciences, 17, 5025–5042, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5025-2020, 2020b.
Michael Mertens, F., Pätzold, S., and Welp, G.: Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and its mapping with apparent electrical conductivity, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 171, 146–154, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625130, 2008.
Miller, E. E. and Miller, R. D.: Physical Theory for Capillary Flow Phenomena, J. Appl. Phys., 27, 324–332, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722370, 1956.
Minasny, B. and Hartemink, A. E.: Predicting soil properties in the tropics, Earth-Sci. Rev., 106, 52–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.005, 2011.
Mohammed, A., Hirmas, D. R., Nemes, A., and Giménez, D.: Exogenous and endogenous controls on the development of soil structure, Geoderma, 357, 113945, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113945, 2020.
Mohammed, A. K., Hirmas, D. R., Gimenez, D., Mandel, R. D., and Miller, J. R.: A Digital Morphometric Approach for Quantifying Ped Shape, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 80, 1604–1618, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.06.0203, 2016.
Montaldo, N. and Albertson, J. D.: On the Use of the ForceRestore SVAT Model Formulation for Stratified Soils, J. Hydrometeorol., 2, 571–578, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0571:OTUOTF>2.0.CO, 2001.
Montzka, C., Herbst, M., Weihermüller, L., Verhoef, A., and Vereecken, H.: A global data set of soil hydraulic properties and sub-grid variability of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 529–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-529-2017, 2017.
Morris, P. J., Davies, M. L., Baird, A. J., Balliston, N., Bourgault, M.-A., Clymo, R. S., Fewster, R. E., Furukawa, A. K., Holden, J., Kessel, E., Ketcheson, S. J., Kløve, B., Larocque, M., Marttila, H., Menberu, M. W., Moore, P. A., Price, J. S., Ronkanen, A.-K., Rosa, E., Strack, M., Surridge, B. W. J., Waddington, J. M., Whittington, P., and Wilkinson, S. L.: Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Northern Peats Inferred From Other Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2022WR033181, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033181, 2022.
Mosquera, G. M., Marín, F., Feyen, J., Célleri, R., Breuer, L., Windhorst, D., and Crespo, P.: A field, laboratory, and literature review evaluation of the water retention curve of volcanic ash soils: How well do standard laboratory methods reflect field conditions?, Hydrol. Process., 35, e14011, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14011, 2021.
Mualem, Y.: A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 12, 513–522, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513, 1976.
Mualem, Y.: A modified dependent-domain theory of hysteresis, Soil Sci., 137, 283–291, 1984.
Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D., Barnett, D. N., Jones, G. S., Webb, M. J., Collins, M., and and Stainforth, D. A.: Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations, Nature, 430, 768–772, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02771, 2004.
Nasta, P., Szabó, B., and Romano, N.: Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for predicting soil hydraulic properties: A voyage from regional to field scales across Europe, J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud., 37, 100903, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100903, 2021.
Nemes, A. and Rawls, W. J.: Soil texture and particle-size distribution as input to estimate soil hydraulic properties, Dev. Soil Sci., 30, 47–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(04)30004-8, 2004.
Nemes, A., Wösten, J., Lilly, A., and Voshaar, J.: Evaluation of different procedures to interpolate particle-size distributions to achieve compatibility within soil databases, Geoderma, 90, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00014-2, 1999.
Nemes, A., Schaap, M., Leij, F., and Wösten, J.: Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0, J. Hydrol, 251, 151–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00465-6, 2001.
Nemes, A., Schaap, M. G., and Wösten, J. H.: Functional evaluation of pedotransfer functions derived from different scales of data collection, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, 1093–1102, 2003.
Nemes, A., Roberts, R. T., Rawls, W. J., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Van Genuchten, M. T.: Software to estimate− 33 and− 1500 kPa soil water retention using the non-parametric k-nearest neighbor technique, Environ. Modell. Softw., 23, 254–255, 2008).
Nemes, A., Timlin, D. J., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Rawls, W. J.: Evaluation of the Rawls et al. (1982) Pedotransfer Functions for their Applicability at the US National Scale, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 1638–1645, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0298, 2009.
Nemes, A., Rawls, W. J., Pachepsky, Y. A., and van Genuchten, M. T.: Sensitivity analysis of the nonparametric nearest neighbor technique to estimate soil water retention, Vadose Zone J., 5, 1222–1235, 2006a.
Nemes, A., Rawls, W. J., and Pachepsky, Y. A.: Use of the nonparametric nearest neighbor approach to estimate soil hydraulic properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 327–336, 2006b.
Ng, W., Minasny, B., Jeon, S. H., and McBratney, A.: Mid-infrared spectroscopy for accurate measurement of an extensive set of soil properties for assessing soil functions, Soil Secur., 6, 100043, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100043, 2022.
Nguyen, P. M., van Le, K., Botula, Y.-D., and Cornelis, W. M.: Evaluation of soil water retention pedotransfer functions for Vietnamese Mekong Delta soils, Agr. Water Manage., 158, 126–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.04.011, 2015.
Nimmo, J. R.: Comment on the treatment of residual water content in “A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface” by L. Luckner et al, Water Resour. Res., 27, 661–662, https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00165, 1991.
Nimmo, J. R.: Porosity And Pore-Size Distribuation, in: Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, Elsevier, 295–303, https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00404-5, 2005.
Nimmo, J. R. and Perkins, K. S.: Aggregate stability and size distribution, in: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4 – Physical Methods, edited by: Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 317–328, https://wwwrcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/uzf/abs_pubs/papers/mosa.ag.pdf (last access: 10 June 2024), 2002.
Oades, J. M. and Waters, A. G.: Aggregate hierarchy in soils, Aust. J. Soil Res., 29, 815828, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910815, 1991.
Oge, J. and Brunet, Y.: A forest floor model for heat and moisture including a litter layer, J. Hydrol., 255, 212–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00515-7, 2002.
Omuto, C., Nachtergaele, F., and Vargas Rojas, R.: State of the Art Report on Global and Regional Soil Information: Where are we? Where to go?, Report, Global Soil Partnership Technical Report, FAO, Rome, https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/GSP/docs/tor/Soil_information_Report.pdf.pdf (last access: 10 June 2024), 2013.
Oosterwoud, M., van der Ploeg, M., van der Schaaf, S., and van der Zee, S.: Variation in hydrologic connectivity as a result of microtopography explained by discharge to catchment size relationship, Hydrol. Process., 31, 2683–2699, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11164, 2017.
Or, D.: The tyranny of small scales – On representing soil processes in global land surface models, Water Resour. Res., 56, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024846, 2019.
Ottoni, M. V., Ottoni Filho, T. B., Schaap, M. G., Lopes-Assad, M., and Rotunno Filho, O. C.: Hydrophysical database for Brazilian soils (HYBRAS) and pedotransfer functions for water retention, Vadose Zone J., 17, 170095, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.05.0095, 2018.
Over, M. W., Wollschläger, U., Osorio-Murillo, C. A., and Rubin, Y.: Bayesian inversion of Mualem-van Genuchten parameters in a multilayer soil profile: A data-driven, assumption-free likelihood function, Water Resour. Res., 51, 861–884, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015252, 2015.
Pachepsky, Y. A. and Rawls, W. J.: Accuracy and reliability of pedotransfer functions as affected by grouping soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 1748–1756, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361748x, 1999.
Pachepsky, Y. A. and Rawls, W. J.: Soil structure and pedotransfer functions, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 54, 443–452, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00485.x, 2003.
Pachepsky, Y. A. and Rawls, W. J.: Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology, Developments in Soil Science, Elsevier, New York, ISBN 9780080530369, 2004.
Paschalis, A., Bonetti, S., Guo, Y., and Fatichi, S.: On the Uncertainty Induced by Pedotransfer Functions in Terrestrial Biosphere Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031871, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031871, 2022.
Patil, N. G. and Singh, S. K.: Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties: A Review, Pedosphere, 26, 417–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60054-6, 2016.
Pelletier, J. D., Broxton, P. D., Hazenberg, P., Zeng, X., Troch, P. A., Niu, G., Williams, Z. C., Brunke, M. A., and Gochis, D.: Global 1-km gridded thickness of soil, regolith, and sedimentary deposit layers, ORNL DAAC, https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1304, 2016.
Peters, A.: Simple consistent models for water retention and hydraulic conductivity in the complete moisture range, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6765–6780, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20548, 2013.
Pham, H. Q., Fredlund, D. G., and Barbour, S. L.: A study of hysteresis models for soil-water characteristic curves, Can. Geotech. J., 42, 1548–1568, 2005.
Philip, J. R.: Similarity hypothesis for capillary hysteresis in porous materials, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1553–1562, 1964.
Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J. W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D. B., and Wagener, T.: Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow, Environ. Modell. Softw., 79, 214–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008, 2016.
Pierce, L. L. and Running, S. W.: The Effects of Aggregating Subgrid Land-Surface Variation on Large-Scale Estimates of Net Primary Production, Landsc. Ecol., 10, 239–253, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129258, 1995.
Pinnington, E., Amezcua, J., Cooper, E., Dadson, S., Ellis, R., Peng, J., Robinson, E., Morrison, R., Osborne, S., and Quaife, T.: Improving soil moisture prediction of a high-resolution land surface model by parameterising pedotransfer functions through assimilation of SMAP satellite data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1617–1641, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1617-2021, 2021.
Pirastru, M., Castellini, M., Giadrossich, F., and Niedda, M.: Comparing the hydraulic properties of forested and grassed soils on an experimental hillslope in a Mediterranean environment, Proced. Environ. Sci., 19, 341–350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.039, 2013.
Pittaki-Chrysodonta, Z., Moldrup, P., Knadel, M., Iversen, B. V., Hermansen, C., Greve, M. H., and Jonge, L. W. de: Predicting the Campbell soil water retention function: Comparing visible-near-infrared spectroscopy with classical pedotransfer function, Vadose Zone J., 17, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.09.0169, 2018.
Poggio, L., Sousa, L. M. de, Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., and Rossiter, D.: SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, SOIL, 7, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021, 2021.
Poulovassilis, A.: Hysteresis of porte water, and application of the concept of independent domains, Soil Sci., 93, 405–412, https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196206000-00007, 1962.
Poulovassilis, A. and Childs, E. C.: The hysteresis of pore water: the non-independence of domains, Soil Sci., 112, 301–312, 1971.
Poulovassilis, A. and Kargas, G.: A note on calculating hysteretic behavior, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1947–1950, 2000.
Priesack, E.: Expert-N Dokumentation der Modellbibliothek: Zugl.: Göttingen, Univ., Habil.-Schr. 2006, FAM-Bericht 60, Hieronymus, München, 2006.
Pringle, M. J., Romano, N., Minasny, B., Chirico, G. B., and Lark, R. M.: Spatial evaluation of pedotransfer functions using wavelet analysis, J. Hydrol., 333, 182–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.007, 2007.
Puhlmann, H. and Wilpert, K. von: Pedotransfer functions for water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of forest soils, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 175, 221–235, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201100139, 2012.
Qiu, C., Zhu, D., Ciais, P., Guenet, B., Krinner, G., Peng, S., Aurela, M., Bernhofer, C., Brümmer, C., Bret-Harte, S., Chu, H., Chen, J., Desai, A. R., Dušek, J., Euskirchen, E. S., Fortuniak, K., Flanagan, L. B., Friborg, T., Grygoruk, M., Gogo, S., Grünwald, T., Hansen, B. U., Holl, D., Humphreys, E., Hurkuck, M., Kiely, G., Klatt, J., Kutzbach, L., Largeron, C., Laggoun-Défarge, F., Lund, M., Lafleur, P. M., Li, X., Mammarella, I., Merbold, L., Nilsson, M. B., Olejnik, J., Ottosson-Löfvenius, M., Oechel, W., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Peichl, M., Pirk, N., Peltola, O., Pawlak, W., Rasse, D., Rinne, J., Shaver, G., Schmid, H. P., Sottocornola, M., Steinbrecher, R., Sachs, T., Urbaniak, M., Zona, D., and Ziemblinska, K.: ORCHIDEE-PEAT (revision 4596), a model for northern peatland CO2, water, and energy fluxes on daily to annual scales, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 497–519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-497-2018, 2018.
Raats, P. A. C. and Knight, J. H.: The Contributions of Lewis Fry Richardson to Drainage Theory, Soil Physics, and the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum, Front. Environ. Sci., 6, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00013, 2018.
Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlüter, S., and Vogel, H.-J.: Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review, Geoderma, 314, 122–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009, 2018.
Rastetter, E. B., King, A. W., Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Oneill, R. V., and Hobbie, J. E.: Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems, Ecol. Appl., 2, 55–70, https://doi.org/10.2307/1941889, 1992.
Rawls, W. J., Nemes, A., and Pachepsky, Y.: Effect of soil organic carbon on soil hydraulic properties, Developments in Soil Science, Elsevier, New York, 95–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(04)30006-1, 2004.
Reeves, J. B.: Near- versus mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil analysis emphasizing carbon and laboratory versus on-site analysis: Where are we and what needs to be done?, Geoderma, 158, 3–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.04.005, 2010.
Reinhardt, N. and Herrmann, L.: Gamma-ray spectrometry as versatile tool in soil science: A critical review, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 182, 9–27, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201700447, 2019.
Ren, J. and Vanapalli, S. K.: Comparison of Soil-Freezing and Soil-Water Characteristic Curves of Two Canadian Soils, Vadose Zone J., 18, 180185, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.10.0185, 2019.
Renger, M., Bohne, K., Facklam, M., Harrach, T., Riek, W., Schäfer, W., Wessolek, G., and Zacharias, S.: Ergebnisse und Vorschläge der DBG-Arbeitsgruppe “Kennwerte des Bodengefüges” zur Schätzung bodenphysikalischer Kennwerte, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242459873_Ergebnisse_und_Vorschlage_der_DBG-Arbeitsgruppe_Kennwerte_des_Bodengefuges_zur_Schatzung_bodenphysikalischer_Kennwerte (last access: 10 June 2024), 2008.
Reynolds, W. D. and Topp, G. C.: Soil water desorption and imbibition: tension and pressure techniques, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 981–1005, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005271.CH72, 2008.
Rezaei, M., Saey, T., Seuntjens, P., Joris, I., Boënne, W., van Meirvenne, M., and Cornelis, W.: Predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity in a sandy grassland using proximally sensed apparent electrical conductivity, J. Appl. Geophys., 126, 35–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.01.010, 2016.
Riedel, T., Weber, T. K. D., and Bergmann, A.: Near constant groundwater recharge efficiency under global change in a central European catchment, Hydrol. Process., 37, e14805, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14805, 2023.
Roberts, D. R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M. S., Elith, J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., Warton, D. I., Wintle, B. A., Hartig, F., and Dormann, C. F.: Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure, Ecography, 40, 913–929, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02881, 2017.
Robinson, D. A., Jones, S. B., Lebron, I., Reinsch, S., Domnguez, M. T., Smith, A. R., Jones, D. L., Marshall, M. R., and Emmett, B. A.: Experimental evidence for drought induced alternative alternative stable states of soil moisture, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 20018, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20018, 2016.
Robinson, D. A., Nemes, A., Reinsch, S., Radbourne, A., Bentley, L., and Keith, A. M.: Global meta-analysis of soil hydraulic properties on the same soils with differing land use, Sci. Total Eviron., 852, 158506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158506, 2022.
Romano, N. and Nasta, P.: How effective is bimodal soil hydraulic characterization? Functional evaluations for predictions of soil water balance, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 67, 523–535, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12354, 2016.
Rustanto, A., Booij, M. J., Wösten, H., and Hoekstra, A. Y.: Application and recalibration of soil water retention pedotransfer functions in a tropical upstream catchment: case study in Bengawan Solo, Indonesia, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 65, 307–320, https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0020, 2017.
Roth, K.: Scaling of water flow through porous media and soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 125–130, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00986.x, 2008.
Sandin, M., Koestel, J., Jarvis, N., and Larsbo, M.: Post-tillage evolution of structural pore space and saturated and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity in a clay loam soil, Soil Till. Res., 165, 161–168, 2017.
Santra, P., Sahoo, R. N., Das, B. S., Samal, R. N., Pattanaik, A. K., and Gupta, V. K.: Estimation of soil hydraulic properties using proximal spectral reflectance in visible, near-infrared, and shortwave-infrared (VIS-NIR-SWIR) region, Geoderma, 152, 338–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.07.001, 2009.
Saxton, K. E. and Rawls, W. J.: Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 1569–1578, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117, 2006.
Scarfone, R., Wheeler, S. J., and Lloret-Cabot, M.: Conceptual Hydraulic Conductivity Model for Unsaturated Soils at Low Degree of Saturation and Its Application to the Study of Capillary Barrier Systems, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 146, 4020106, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002357, 2020.
Schaap, M. G. and Leij, F. J.: Improved prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with the Mualem‐van Genuchten model, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 843–851, 2000.
Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., and van Genuchten, M. T.: ROSETTA: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions, J. Hydrol., 251, 163–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8, 2001.
Schelle, H., Iden, S. C., Peters, A., and Durner, W.: Analysis of the agreement of soil hydraulic properties obtained from Multistep-Outflow and Evaporation methods, Vadose Zone J., 9, 1080–1091, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0050, 2010.
Schelle, H., Iden, S. C., Fank, J., and Durner, W.: Inverse Estimation of Soil Hydraulic and Root Distribution Parameters from Lysimeter Data, Vadose Zone J., 11, vzj2011.0169, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0169, 2012.
Schlüter, S., Albrecht, L., Schwärzel, K., and Kreiselmeier, J.: Long-term effects of conventional tillage and no-tillage on saturated and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity-Can their prediction be improved by pore metrics obtained with X-ray CT?, Geoderma, 361, 114082, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114082, 2020.
Schmäck, J., Weihermüller, L., Klotzsche, A., von Hebel, C., Pätzold, S., Welp, G., and Vereecken, H.: Large-scale detection and quantification of harmful soil compaction in a post-mining landscape using multi-configuration electromagnetic induction, Soil Use Manage., 38, 212–228, https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12763, 2022.
Schmidt, J. H., Junge, S., and Finckh, M. R.: Cover crops and compost prevent weed seed bank buildup in herbicide-free wheat-potato rotations under conservation tillage, Ecol. Evol., 9, 2715–2724, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4942, 2019.
Schofield, R. K.: The pF of the water in soil, in: International congress of soil science, Vol. 3, 37–48, International Society of Soil Science (ISSS), https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/97yx6/the-pf-of-the-water-in-soil (last access: 21 June 2024), 1935.
Scott, P. S.: Hysteretic effects on net infiltration, Adv. Infil., 11, 163–170, 1983.
Sharma, M. L. and Uehara, G.: Influence of soil structure on water relations in low humic latosols: I. Water retention, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 32, 765–770, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1968.03615995003200060021x, 1968.
Shokri, N. and Salvucci, G. D.: Evaporation from porous media in the presence of a water table, Vadose Zone J., 10, 1309–1318, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0027, 2011.
Šimùnek, J., van Genuchten, M. T., and Šejna, M.: Recent Developments and Applications of the HYDRUS Computer Software Packages, Vadose Zone J., 15, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033, 2016.
Sloat, L. L., Davis, S. J., Gerber, J. S., Moore, F. C., Ray, D., West, P. C., and Mueller, N. D.: Climate adaptation by crop migration, Nat. Commun., 11, 1243, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15076-4, 2020.
Sobieraj, J. A., Elsenbeer, H., and Vertessy, R. A.: Pedotransfer functions for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity: implications for modeling storm flow generation, J. Hydrol., 251, 202–220, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00469-3, 2001.
Soil Science Division Staff: Soil survey manual, edited by: Ditzler, C., Scheffe, K., and Monger, H. C., Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/The-Soil-Survey-Manual.pdf (last access: 21 June 2024), 2017.
Soil Survey Staff: Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th Edn., USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Keys-to-Soil-Taxonomy.pdf (last access: 21 June 2024), 2014.
Soriano-Disla, J. M., Janik, L. J., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Macdonald, L. M., and McLaughlin, M. J.: The Performance of Visible, Near-, and Mid-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for Prediction of Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 49, 139–186, https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2013.811081, 2014.
Späth, F., Rajtschan, V., Weber, T. K. D., Morandage, S., Lange, D., Abbas, S. S., Behrendt, A., Ingwersen, J., Streck, T., and Wulfmeyer, V.: The land–atmosphere feedback observatory: a new observational approach for characterizing land–atmosphere feedback, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 25–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, 2023.
Stewart, R. D., Abou Najm, M. R., Rupp, D. E., and Selker, J. S.: Modeling multidomain hydraulic properties of shrink-swell soils, Water Resour. Res., 52, 7911–7930, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019336, 2016.
Streck, T. and Weber, T. K.: Analytical expressions for noncapillary soil water retention based on popular capillary retention models, Vadose Zone J., 19, e20042, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20042, 2020.
Strudley, M. W., Green, T. R., and Ascough, J. C.: Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: State of the science, Soil Till. Res., 99, 4–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.01.007, 2008.
Sullivan, P. L., Billings, S. A., Hirmas, D., Li, L., Zhang, X., Ziegler, S., Murenbeeld, K., Ajami, H., Guthrie, A., Singha, K., Giménez, D., Duro, A., Moreno, V., Flores, A., Cueva, A., Koop, Aronson, E. L., Barnard, H. R., Banwart, S. A., Keen, R. M., Nemes, A., Nikolaidis, N. P., Nippert, J. B., Richter, D., Robinson, D. A., Sadayappan, K., de Souza, L. F. T., Unruh, M., and Wen, H.: Embracing the dynamic nature of soil structure: A paradigm illuminating the role of life in critical zones of the Anthropocene, Earth-Sci. Rev., 225, 103873, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103873, 2022.
Suwardji, P. and Eberbach, P. L.: Seasonal changes of physical properties of an Oxic Paleustalf (Red Kandosol) after 16 years of direct drilling or conventional cultivation, Soil Till. Res., 49, 65–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00149-4, 1998.
Szabó, B., Gyurkó, D., Weynants, M., and Weber, T. K. D.: Web interface for European hydraulic pedotransfer functions (euptfv2), https://ptfinterface.rissac.hu/ (last access: 13 June 2024), 2019.
Szabó, B., Weynants, M., and Weber, T. K. D.: Updated European hydraulic pedotransfer functions with communicated uncertainties in the predicted variables (euptfv2), Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 151–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-151-2021, 2021.
Tafasca, S., Ducharne, A., and Valentin, C.: Weak sensitivity of the terrestrial water budget to global soil texture maps in the ORCHIDEE land surface model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3753–3774, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3753-2020, 2020.
Teepe, R., Dilling, H., and Beese, F.: Estimating water retention curves of forest soils from soil texture and bulk density, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 166, 111–119 , https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200390001, 2003.
Terribile, F., Coppola, A., Langella, G., Martina, M., and Basile, A.: Potential and limitations of using soil mapping information to understand landscape hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3895–3933, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3895-2011, 2011.
Tóth, B., Weynants, M., Nemes, A., Makó, A., Bilas, G., and Tóth, G.: New generation of hydraulic pedotransfer functions for Europe, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 226–238, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12192, 2015.
Tóth, B., Weynants, M., Pásztor, L., and Hengl, T.: 3D soil hydraulic database of Europe at 250 m resolution, Hydrol. Process., 31, 2662–2666, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11203, 2017.
Tranter, G., Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., Rossel, R. V., and Murphy, B. W.: Comparing spectral soil inference systems and mid-infrared spectroscopic predictions of soil moisture retention, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1394–1400, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0188, 2008.
Tuller, M. and Or, D.: Hydraulic conductivity of variably saturated porous media: Film and corner flow in angular pore space, Water Resour. Res., 37, 1257–1276, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900328, 2001.
Tuller, M. and Or, D.: Water films and scaling of soil characteristic curves at low water contents, Water Resour. Res., 41, W09403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004142, 2005.
Twarakavi, N. K., Sakai, M., and Šimůnek, J.: An objective analysis of the dynamic nature of field capacity, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10410, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007944, 2009.
Vanclooster, M., Boesten, J. J. T. I., Trevisan, M., Brown, C. D., Capri, E., Eklo, O. M., Gottesburen, B., Gouy, V., and van der Linden, A. M. A.: A European test of pesticide-leaching models: methodology and major recommendations, Agr. Water Manage., 44, 1–19, 2000.
van Dam, J. C., Wösten, J. H., and Nemes, A.: Unsaturated soil water movement in hysteretic and water repellent field soils, J. Hydrol., 184, 153–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02996-6, 1996.
van Genuchten, M. T.: A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x, 1980.
van Looy, K., Bouma, J., Herbst, M., Koestel, J., Minasny, B., Mishra, U., Montzka, C., Nemes, A., Pachepsky, Y. A., Padarian, J., Schaap, M. G., Tóth, B., Verhoef, A., Vanderborght, J., van der Ploeg, M. J., Weihermüller, L., Zacharias, S., Zhang, Y., and Vereecken, H.: Pedotransfer Functions in Earth System Science: Challenges and Perspectives, Rev. Geophys., 55, 1199–1256, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000581, 2017.
Vereecken, H., Diels, J., van Orshoven, J., Feyen, J., and Bouma, J.: Functional Evaluation of Pedotransfer Functions for the Estimation of Soil Hydraulic Properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1371–1378, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600050007x, 1992.
Vereecken, H., Kasteel, R., Vanderborght, J., and Harter, T.: Upscaling Hydraulic Properties and Soil Water Flow Processes in Heterogeneous Soils: A Review, Vadose Zone J., 6, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0055, 2007.
Vereecken, H., Weynants, M., Javaux, M., Pachepsky, Y., Schaap, M. G., and van Genuchten, M.: Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: A review, Vadose Zone J., 9, 795–820, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0045, 2010.
Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., Vanderborght, J., Young, M., Amelung, W., Aitkenhead, M., Allison, S., Assouline, S., Baveye, P., Berli, M., Brüggemann, N., Finke, P., Flury, M., Gaiser, T., Govers, G., Ghezzehei, T., Hallett, P., Hendricks Franssen, H., Heppell, J., Horn, R., Huisman, J., Jacques, D., Jonard, F., Kollet, S., Lafolie, F., Lamorski, K., Leitner, D., McBratney, A., Minasny, B., Montzka, C., Nowak, W., Pachepsky, Y., Padarian, J., Romano, N., Roth, K., Rothfuss, Y., Rowe, E., Schwen, A., imunek, J., Tiktak, A., van Dam, J., van der Zee, S., Vogel, H., Vrugt, J., Wöhling, T., and Young, I.: Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives, Vadose Zone J., 15, 1–57, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.09.0131, 2016.
Vereecken, H., Weihermüller, L., Assouline, S., Šimùnek, J., Verhoef, A., Herbst, M., Archer, N., Mohanty, B., Montzka, C., Vanderborght, J., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, M., Boone, A., Chadburn, S., Cuntz, M., Decharme, B., Ducharne, A., Ek, M., Garrigues, S., Goergen, K., Ingwersen, J., Kollet, S., Lawrence, D. M., Li, Q., Or, D., Swenson, S., de Vrese, P., Walko, R., Wu, Y., and Xue, Y.: Infiltration from the Pedon to Global Grid Scales: An Overview and Outlook for Land Surface Modeling, Vadose Zone J., 18, 1–53, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.10.0191, 2019.
Vereecken, H., Amelung, W., Bauke, S. L., Bogena, H., Brüggemann, N., Montzka, C., Vanderborght, J., Bechtold, M., Blöschl, G., Carminati, A., Javaux, M., Konings, A. G., Kusche, J., Neuweiler, I., Or, D., Steele-Dunne, S., Verhoef, A., Young, M., and Zhang, Y.: Soil hydrology in the Earth system, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 573–587, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00324-6, 2022.
Vogel, H.-J.: Scale Issues in Soil Hydrology, Vadose Zone J., 18, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2019.01.0001, 2019.
Vogel, H.-J. and Roth, K.: Moving through scales of flow and transport in soil, J. Hydrol., 272, 95–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00257-3, 2003.
Vogel, H.-J., Bartke, S., Daedlow, K., Helming, K., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lang, B., Rabot, E., Russell, D., Stößel, B., Weller, U., Wiesmeier, M., and Wollschläger, U.: A systemic approach for modeling soil functions, SOIL, 4, 83–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-83-2018, 2018.
Volk, E., Iden, S. C., Furman, A., Durner, W., and Rosenzweig, R.: Biofilm effect on soil hydraulic properties: Experimental investigation using soil-grown real biofilm, Water Resour. Res., 52, 5813–5828, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018866, 2016.
Wallor, E., Rosskopf, N., and Zeitz, J.: Hydraulic properties of drained and cultivated fen soils part I – Horizon-based evaluation of van Genuchten parameters considering the state of moorsh-forming process, Geoderma, 313, 69–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.026, 2018.
Wang, Y., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, M., and Edmunds, W. M.: A new theoretical model accounting for film flow in unsaturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 49, 5021–5028, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20390, 2013.
Warrach-Sagi, K., Ingwersen, J., Schwitalla, T., Troost, C., Aurbacher, J., Jach, L., Berger, T., Streck, T., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Noah-MP With the Generic Crop Growth Model Gecros in the WRF Model: Effects of Dynamic Crop Growth on Land-Atmosphere Interaction, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036518, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036518, 2022.
Weber, T., Finkel, M., Da Conceição Gonçalves, M., Vereecken, H., and Diamantopoulos, E.: Pedotransfer Function for th Genuchten–Mualem Model, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026820, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026820, 2020.
Weber, T. K. D., Iden, S. C., and Durner, W.: A pore-size classification for peat bogs derived from unsaturated hydraulic properties, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6185–6200, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6185-2017, 2017a.
Weber, T. K. D., Iden, S. C., and Durner, W.: Unsaturated hydraulic properties of Sphagnum moss and peat reveal trimodal pore-size distributions, Water Resour. Res., 53, 415–434, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019707, 2017b.
Weber, T. K. D., Durner, W., Streck, T., and Diamantopoulos, E.: A modular framework for modelling unsaturated soil hydraulic properties over the full moisture range, Water Resour. Res., 4994–5011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024584, 2019.
Weihermüller, L., Lehmann, P., Herbst, M., Rahmati, M., Verhoef, A., Or, D., Jacques, D., and Vereecken, H.: Choice of pedotransfer functions matters when simulating soil water balance fluxes, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 13, e2020MS002404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002404, 2021.
Weller, U., Ippisch, O., Köhne, M., and Vogel, H.-J.: Direct measurement of unsaturated conductivity including hydraulic nonequilibrium and hysteresis, Vadose Zone J., 10, 654–661, 2011.
Weller, U., Albrecht, L., Schlüter, S., and Vogel, H.-J.: An open Soil Structure Library based on X-ray CT data, SOIL, 8, 507–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-507-2022, 2022.
Weynants, M. and Tóth, B.: The euptf package, The European soil portal, p. 5, http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu (last access: 10 July 2024), 2014.
Weynants, M., Vereecken, H., and Javaux, M.: Revisiting Vereecken Pedotransfer Functions: Introducing a Closed-Form Hydraulic Model, Vadose Zone J., 8, 86–95, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2008.0062, 2009.
Weynants, M., Montanarella, L., Toth, G., Strauss, P., Feichtinger, F., Cornelis, W., Javaux, M., Matula, S., Daroussin, J., Hennings, V., and Schindler, U.: European HYdropedological Data Inventory (EU-HYDI), EUR-Scientific and Technical Research Series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://doi.org/10.2788/5936, 2013.
Wöhling, T. and Vrugt, J. A.: Combining multiobjective optimization and Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles of soil hydraulic models, Water Resour. Res., 44, W12432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007154, 2008.
Wöhling, T. and Vrugt, J. A.: Multiresponse multilayer vadose zone model calibration using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and field water retention data, Water Resour. Res., 47, W04510, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009265, 2011.
Wöhling, T., Schütze, N., Heinrich, B., Šimùnek, J., and Barkle, G. F.: Three-Dimensional Modeling of Multiple Automated Equilibrium Tension Lysimeters to Measure Vadose Zone Fluxes, Vadose Zone J., 8, 1051–1063, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0040, 2009.
Wösten, J., Lilly, A., Nemes, A., and Le Bas, C.: Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils, Geoderma, 90, 169–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00132-3, 1999.
Wösten, J., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Rawls, W. J.: Pedotransfer functions: Bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics, J. Hydrol., 251, 123–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00464-4, 2001.
Wösten, J., Verzandvoort, S., Leenaars, J., Hoogland, T., and Wesseling, J. G.: Soil hydraulic information for river basin studies in semi-arid regions, Geoderma, 195-196, 79–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.11.021, 2013.
Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J., and Holden, J.: PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis, Catena, 160, 134–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010, 2018.
Young, M., McDonald, E. V., Caldwell, T. G., Benner, S. G., and Meadows, D. G.: Hydraulic properties of a desert soil chronosequence in the Mojave Desert, USA, Vadose Zone J., 3, 956–963, https://doi.org/10.2113/3.3.956, 2004.
Zagyvai-Kiss, K. A., Kalicz, P., Szilgyi, J., and Gribovszki, Z.: On the specific water holding capacity of litter for three forest ecosystems in the eastern foothills of the Alps, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 278, 107656, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107656, 2019.
Zeng, Y., Verhoef, A., Or, D., Cuntz, M., Gudmundsson, L., Weihermueller, L., Kollet, S., Vanderborght, J., and Vereecken, H.: GEWEX-ISMC SoilWat Project: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead, GEWEX Newsletter 2, https://researchgate.net/publication/355169233_GEWEX-ISMC_SoilWat_Project_Taking_Stock_and_Looking_Ahead (last access: 21 June 2024), 2021.
Zhang, Y. and Schaap, M. G.: Weighted recalibration of the Rosetta pedotransfer model with improved estimates of hydraulic parameter distributions and summary statistics (Rosetta3), J. Hydrol., 547, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.004, 2017.
Zhang, Y. and Schaap, M. G.: Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with pedotransfer functions: A review, J. Hydrol., 575, 1011–1030, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.058, 2019.
Zhang, Y., Schaap, M. G., Guadagnini, A., and Neuman, S. P.: Inverse Modeling of Unsaturated Flow Using Clusters of Soil Texture and Pedotransfer Functions, Water Resour. Res., 52, 7631–7644, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019016, 2016.
Zhang, Y., Weihermüller, L., Toth, B., Noman, M., and Vereecken, H.: Analyzing dual porosity in soil hydraulic properties using soil databases for pedotransfer function development, Vadose Zone J., 21, e20227, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20227, 2022.
Zhu, J. T. and Mohanty, B. P., Spatial Averaging of van Genuchten Hydraulic Parameters for Steady-State Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: A Numerical Study, Vadose Zone J., 1, 261272, https://doi.org/10.2113/1.2.261, 2002.
Executive editor
I think this paper may be worth highlighting because it provides a thorough description of a cross-disciplinary problem that has yet to be addressed in practice. The use of PTFs measured at small scales within global models represents a huge discrepancy. This paper challenges us to reconsider how we do things in this field.
I think this paper may be worth highlighting because it provides a thorough description of a...
Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to predict parameters of models describing the hydraulic properties of soils. The appropriateness of these predictions critically relies on the nature of the datasets for training the PTFs and the physical comprehensiveness of the models. This roadmap paper is addressed to PTF developers and users and critically reflects the utility and future of PTFs. To this end, we present a manifesto aiming at a paradigm shift in PTF research.
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to predict parameters of models describing the hydraulic...