Articles | Volume 26, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A comparison of hydrological models with different level of complexity in Alpine regions in the context of climate change
Francesca Carletti
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Davos, Switzerland
Adrien Michel
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Davos, Switzerland
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Francesca Casale
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Alice Burri
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Davos, Switzerland
Daniele Bocchiola
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Mathias Bavay
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Davos, Switzerland
Michael Lehning
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Davos, Switzerland
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Related authors
Francesca Carletti, Carlo Marin, Chiara Ghielmini, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents the first high-resolution dataset of wet snow properties for satellite applications. With it, we validate links between Sentinel-1 backscattering and snowmelt stages, and investigate scattering mechanisms through a radiative transfer model. We disclose the influence of liquid water content and surface roughness at different melting stages and address future challenges, such as capturing large-scale scattering mechanisms and enhancing radiative transfer modules for wet snow.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research revisits a classic scientific technique, melting calorimetry, to measure snow liquid water content. This study shows with a novel uncertainty propagation framework that melting calorimetry, traditionally less trusted than freezing calorimetry, can produce accurate results. The study defines optimal experiment parameters and a robust field protocol. Melting calorimetry has the potential to become a valuable tool for validating other liquid water content measuring techniques.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry, traditionally confined to school labs, this paper demonstrates its application in the field for accurate measurement of liquid water content in snow. Dispelling misconceptions about measurement uncertainty, it provide a robust protocol and quantifies associated uncertainties. The findings endorse the broader adoption of melting calorimetry for quantification of snow liquid water content in operational context.
Mahdi Jafari and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3035, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3035, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how air moves within snow in Arctic regions and how this affects the snow's structure. Using a new method that links two computer models, we found that cold weather can trigger air movement inside the snow, creating vertical channels and changing the snow's density and temperature. These changes are not captured by traditional models, so our work helps improve how snow and climate processes are simulated in cold environments.
Francesca Carletti, Carlo Marin, Chiara Ghielmini, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-974, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents the first high-resolution dataset of wet snow properties for satellite applications. With it, we validate links between Sentinel-1 backscattering and snowmelt stages, and investigate scattering mechanisms through a radiative transfer model. We disclose the influence of liquid water content and surface roughness at different melting stages and address future challenges, such as capturing large-scale scattering mechanisms and enhancing radiative transfer modules for wet snow.
Christoph Marty, Adrien Michel, Tobias Jonas, Cynthia Steijn, Regula Muelchi, and Sven Kotlarski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-413, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-413, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents the first long-term (since 1962), daily, 1 km gridded dataset of snow depth and water storage for Switzerland. Its quality was assessed by comparing yearly, monthly, and weekly values to a higher-quality model and in-situ measurements. Results show good overall performance, though some limitations exist at low elevations and short timescales. Despite this, the dataset effectively captures trends, offering valuable insights for climate monitoring and elevation-based changes.
Elizaveta Sharaborova, Michael Lehning, Nander Wever, Marcia Phillips, and Hendrik Huwald
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4174, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4174, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global warming provokes permafrost to thaw, damaging landscapes and infrastructure. This study explores methods to slow this thawing at an alpine site. We investigate different methods based on passive and active cooling system. The best approach mixes both methods and manages heat flow, potentially allowing excess energy to be used locally.
Adrien Michel, Johannes Aschauer, Tobias Jonas, Stefanie Gubler, Sven Kotlarski, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8969–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a method to correct snow cover maps (represented in terms of snow water equivalent) to match better-quality maps. The correction can then be extended backwards and forwards in time for periods when better-quality maps are not available. The method is fast and gives good results. It is then applied to obtain a climatology of the snow cover in Switzerland over the past 60 years at a resolution of 1 d and 1 km. This is the first time that such a dataset has been produced.
Stephanie Mayer, Martin Hendrick, Adrien Michel, Bettina Richter, Jürg Schweizer, Heini Wernli, and Alec van Herwijnen
The Cryosphere, 18, 5495–5517, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the impact of climate change on snow avalanche activity is crucial for safeguarding lives and infrastructure. Here, we project changes in avalanche activity in the Swiss Alps throughout the 21st century. Our findings reveal elevation-dependent patterns of change, indicating a decrease in dry-snow avalanches alongside an increase in wet-snow avalanches at elevations above the current treeline. These results underscore the necessity to revisit measures for avalanche risk mitigation.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research revisits a classic scientific technique, melting calorimetry, to measure snow liquid water content. This study shows with a novel uncertainty propagation framework that melting calorimetry, traditionally less trusted than freezing calorimetry, can produce accurate results. The study defines optimal experiment parameters and a robust field protocol. Melting calorimetry has the potential to become a valuable tool for validating other liquid water content measuring techniques.
Hongxiang Yu, Michael Lehning, Guang Li, Benjamin Walter, Jianping Huang, and Ning Huang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2458, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2458, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Cornices are overhanging snow accumulations that form on mountain crests. Previous studies focused on how cornices collapse, little is known about why they form in the first place, specifically how snow particles adhere together to form the front end of the cornice. This study looked at the movement of snow particles around a developing cornice to understand how they gather, the speed and angle at which the snow particles hit the cornice surface, and how this affects the shape of the cornice.
Sonja Wahl, Benjamin Walter, Franziska Aemisegger, Luca Bianchi, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 18, 4493–4515, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind-driven airborne transport of snow is a frequent phenomenon in snow-covered regions and a process difficult to study in the field as it is unfolding over large distances. Thus, we use a ring wind tunnel with infinite fetch positioned in a cold laboratory to study the evolution of the shape and size of airborne snow. With the help of stable water isotope analyses, we identify the hitherto unobserved process of airborne snow metamorphism that leads to snow particle rounding and growth.
Dylan Reynolds, Louis Quéno, Michael Lehning, Mahdi Jafari, Justine Berg, Tobias Jonas, Michael Haugeneder, and Rebecca Mott
The Cryosphere, 18, 4315–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Information about atmospheric variables is needed to produce simulations of mountain snowpacks. We present a model that can represent processes that shape mountain snowpack, focusing on the accumulation of snow. Simulations show that this model can simulate the complex path that a snowflake takes towards the ground and that this leads to differences in the distribution of snow by the end of winter. Overall, this model shows promise with regard to improving forecasts of snow in mountains.
Gwendolyn Dasser, Valentin T. Bickel, Marius Rüetschi, Mylène Jacquemart, Mathias Bavay, Elisabeth D. Hafner, Alec van Herwijnen, and Andrea Manconi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1510, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding snowpack wetness is crucial for predicting wet snow avalanches, but detailed data is often limited to certain locations. Using satellite radar, we monitor snow wetness spatially continuously. By combining different radar tracks from Sentinel-1, we improved spatial resolution and tracked snow wetness over several seasons. Our results indicate higher snow wetness to correlate with increased wet snow avalanche activity, suggesting our method can help identify potential risk areas.
Benjamin Bouchard, Daniel F. Nadeau, Florent Domine, Nander Wever, Adrien Michel, Michael Lehning, and Pierre-Erik Isabelle
The Cryosphere, 18, 2783–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations over several winters at two boreal sites in eastern Canada show that rain-on-snow (ROS) events lead to the formation of melt–freeze layers and that preferential flow is an important water transport mechanism in the sub-canopy snowpack. Simulations with SNOWPACK generally show good agreement with observations, except for the reproduction of melt–freeze layers. This was improved by simulating intercepted snow microstructure evolution, which also modulates ROS-induced runoff.
Daniela Brito Melo, Armin Sigmund, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 18, 1287–1313, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1287-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1287-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow saltation – the transport of snow close to the surface – occurs when the wind blows over a snow-covered surface with sufficient strength. This phenomenon is represented in some climate models; however, with limited accuracy. By performing numerical simulations and a detailed analysis of previous works, we show that snow saltation is characterized by two regimes. This is not represented in climate models in a consistent way, which hinders the quantification of snow transport and sublimation.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry, traditionally confined to school labs, this paper demonstrates its application in the field for accurate measurement of liquid water content in snow. Dispelling misconceptions about measurement uncertainty, it provide a robust protocol and quantifies associated uncertainties. The findings endorse the broader adoption of melting calorimetry for quantification of snow liquid water content in operational context.
Dylan Reynolds, Ethan Gutmann, Bert Kruyt, Michael Haugeneder, Tobias Jonas, Franziska Gerber, Michael Lehning, and Rebecca Mott
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5049–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The challenge of running geophysical models is often compounded by the question of where to obtain appropriate data to give as input to a model. Here we present the HICAR model, a simplified atmospheric model capable of running at spatial resolutions of hectometers for long time series or over large domains. This makes physically consistent atmospheric data available at the spatial and temporal scales needed for some terrestrial modeling applications, for example seasonal snow forecasting.
Johannes Aschauer, Adrien Michel, Tobias Jonas, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4063–4081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent is the mass of water stored in a snowpack. Based on exponential settling functions, the empirical snow density model SWE2HS is presented to convert time series of daily snow water equivalent into snow depth. The model has been calibrated with data from Switzerland and validated with independent data from the European Alps. A reference implementation of SWE2HS is available as a Python package.
Hongxiang Yu, Guang Li, Benjamin Walter, Michael Lehning, Jie Zhang, and Ning Huang
The Cryosphere, 17, 639–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow cornices lead to the potential risk of causing snow avalanche hazards, which are still unknown so far. We carried out a wind tunnel experiment in a cold lab to investigate the environmental conditions for snow cornice accretion recorded by a camera. The length growth rate of the cornices reaches a maximum for wind speeds approximately 40 % higher than the threshold wind speed. Experimental results improve our understanding of the cornice formation process.
Varun Sharma, Franziska Gerber, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 719–749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most current generation climate and weather models have a relatively simplistic description of snow and snow–atmosphere interaction. One reason for this is the belief that including an advanced snow model would make the simulations too computationally demanding. In this study, we bring together two state-of-the-art models for atmosphere (WRF) and snow cover (SNOWPACK) and highlight both the feasibility and necessity of such coupled models to explore underexplored phenomena in the cryosphere.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an Eulerian–Lagrangian snow transport model implemented in the fluid dynamics software OpenFOAM, which we call snowBedFoam 1.0. We apply this model to reproduce snow deposition on a piece of ridged Arctic sea ice, which was produced during the MOSAiC expedition through scan measurements. The model appears to successfully reproduce the enhanced snow accumulation and deposition patterns, although some quantitative uncertainties were shown.
David N. Wagner, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher Cox, Ola G. Persson, Taneil Uttal, Markus M. Frey, Amélie Kirchgaessner, Martin Schneebeli, Matthias Jaggi, Amy R. Macfarlane, Polona Itkin, Stefanie Arndt, Stefan Hendricks, Daniela Krampe, Marcel Nicolaus, Robert Ricker, Julia Regnery, Nikolai Kolabutin, Egor Shimanshuck, Marc Oggier, Ian Raphael, Julienne Stroeve, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 16, 2373–2402, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Based on measurements of the snow cover over sea ice and atmospheric measurements, we estimate snowfall and snow accumulation for the MOSAiC ice floe, between November 2019 and May 2020. For this period, we estimate 98–114 mm of precipitation. We suggest that about 34 mm of snow water equivalent accumulated until the end of April 2020 and that at least about 50 % of the precipitated snow was eroded or sublimated. Further, we suggest explanations for potential snowfall overestimation.
Joel Fiddes, Kristoffer Aalstad, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1753–1768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1753-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1753-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study describes and evaluates a new downscaling scheme that addresses the need for hillslope-scale atmospheric forcing time series for modelling the local impact of regional climate change on the land surface in mountain areas. The method has a global scope and is able to generate all model forcing variables required for hydrological and land surface modelling. This is important, as impact models require high-resolution forcings such as those generated here to produce meaningful results.
Adrien Michel, Bettina Schaefli, Nander Wever, Harry Zekollari, Michael Lehning, and Hendrik Huwald
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1063–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents an extensive study of climate change impacts on river temperature in Switzerland. Results show that, even for low-emission scenarios, water temperature increase will lead to adverse effects for both ecosystems and socio-economic sectors throughout the 21st century. For high-emission scenarios, the effect will worsen. This study also shows that water seasonal warming will be different between the Alpine regions and the lowlands. Finally, efficiency of models is assessed.
Mathias Bavay, Michael Reisecker, Thomas Egger, and Daniela Korhammer
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 365–378, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most users struggle with the configuration of numerical models. This can be improved by relying on a GUI, but this requires a significant investment and a specific skill set and does not fit with the daily duties of model developers, leading to major maintenance burdens. Inishell generates a GUI on the fly based on an XML description of the required configuration elements, making maintenance very simple. This concept has been shown to work very well in our context.
Pirmin Philipp Ebner, Franziska Koch, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Florian Hanzer, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Hugues François, Daniel Günther, Fabiano Monti, Olivier Hargoaa, Ulrich Strasser, Samuel Morin, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 15, 3949–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A service to enable real-time optimization of grooming and snow-making at ski resorts was developed and evaluated using both GNSS-measured snow depth and spaceborne snow maps derived from Copernicus Sentinel-2. The correlation to the ground observation data was high. Potential sources for the overestimation of the snow depth by the simulations are mainly the impact of snow redistribution by skiers, compensation of uneven terrain, or spontaneous local adaptions of the snow management.
Marcel Haeberli, Daniel Baggenstos, Jochen Schmitt, Markus Grimmer, Adrien Michel, Thomas Kellerhals, and Hubertus Fischer
Clim. Past, 17, 843–867, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using the temperature-dependent solubility of noble gases in ocean water, we reconstruct global mean ocean temperature (MOT) over the last 700 kyr using noble gas ratios in air enclosed in polar ice cores. Our record shows that glacial MOT was about 3 °C cooler compared to the Holocene. Interglacials before 450 kyr ago were characterized by about 1.5 °C lower MOT than the Holocene. In addition, some interglacials show transient maxima in ocean temperature related to changes in ocean circulation.
Cited articles
Adda Consortium: Consorzio dell'Adda, https://www.addaconsorzio.it/ (last access: 6 May 2020), 2022. a
Aili, T., Soncini, A., Bianchi, A., Diolaiuti, G., D'Agata, C., and Bocchiola, D.: Assessing water resources under climate change in high-altitude catchments: a methodology and an application in the Italian Alps, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 135, 135–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2366-4, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Dutra, E., Day, J., Sandu, I., Boussetta, S., and
Haiden, T.: Impact of a Multi‐Layer Snow Scheme on Near‐Surface Weather
Forecasts, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 4687–4710, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001725, 2019. a
Bair, E. H., Rittger, K., Ahmad, J. A., and Chabot, D.: Comparison of modeled
snow properties in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan, The Cryosphere, 14,
331–347, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-331-2020, 2020. a
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a
warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005. a
Bavay, M., Lehning, M., Jonas, T., and Löwe, H.: Simulations of future snow
cover and discharge in Alpine headwater catchments, Hydrol. Process., 23, 95–108, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7195, 2009. a
Bavay, M., Grünewald, T., and Lehning, M.: Response of snow cover and runoff to climate change in high Alpine catchments of Eastern Switzerland, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 4–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.12.009, 2013. a
Bavera, D., Bavay, M., Jonas, T., Lehning, M., and De Michele, C.: A
comparison between two statistical and a physically-based model in snow water
equivalent mapping, Adv. Water Resour., 63, 167–178,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.11.011, 2014. a
Bellprat, O., Kotlarski, S., Lüthi, D., and Schär, C.: Physical constraints for temperature biases in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4042–4047, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50737, 2013. a
Beven, K.: Changing ideas in hydrology – The case of physically-based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7, 1989. a
Beven, K.: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological
modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 41–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E, 1993. a
Beven, K.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320,
18–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007, 2006. a
Boberg, F. and Christensen, J.: Overestimation of Mediterranean summer
temperature projections due to model deficiencies, Nat. Clim. Change, 2,
433–436, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1454, 2012. a
Bocchiola, D., Soncini, A., Senese, A., and Diolaiuti, G.: Modelling
Hydrological Components of the Rio Maipo of Chile, and Their Prospective
Evolution under Climate Change, Climate, 6, 57, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6030057, 2018. a, b
Bombelli, G. M., Tomiet, S., Bianchi, A., and Bocchiola, D.: Impact of
Prospective Climate Change Scenarios upon Hydropower Potential of Ethiopia in
GERD and GIBE Dams, Water, 13, 716, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050716, 2021. a
Bougamont, M., Bamber, J., Ridley, J., Gladstone, R., Grueull, W., Hanna, E.,
Payne, A., and Rutt, I.: Impact of model physics on estimating the surface
mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L17501,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030700, 2007. a
Brauchli, T., Trujillo, E., Huwald, H., and Lehning, M.: Influence of
Slope-Scale Snowmelt on Catchment Response Simulated With the Alpine3D
Model, Water Resour. Res., 53, 10723–10739, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021278, 2017. a
Casale, F., Bombelli, G. M., Monti, R., and Bocchiola, D.: Hydropower potential in the Kabul River under climate change scenarios in the XXI century, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 139, 1415–1434,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03052-y, 2020. a, b, c, d
Christensen, J., Boberg, F., Christensen, O., and Lucas-Picher, P.: On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035694, 2008. a
Côté, K., Madore, J.-B., and Langlois, A.: Evaluating The Potential Of Using Snowpack And Alpine3D Simulations In Three Candadian Mountain Climates, ISSW, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3463.9363, 2014. a
Criss, R. and Winston, W.: Do Nash Values Have Value? Discussion and Alternate Proposals, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2723–2725, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7072, 2008. a
Cronshey, R.: Urban hydrology for small watersheds, 2nd Edn., US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division,
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/24438 (last access: 20 June 2022), 1986. a
Déry, S. J., Stahl, K., Moore, R. D., Whitfield, P. H., Menounos, B., and
Burford, J. E.: Detection of runoff timing changes in pluvial, nival, and
glacial rivers of western Canada, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04426, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006975, 2009. a
Epting, J., Michel, A., Annette, A., and Peter, H.: Climate change effects on
groundwater recharge and temperatures in Swiss alluvial aquifers, J.
Hydrol. X, 11, 100071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100071, 2021. a
ESRI: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)/ArcGIS Release 10.8.1,
https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-desktop/overview (last access: 20 June 2020), 2012. a
European Environment Agency: CORINE Land Cover (CLC) 2006,
Version 17, Kopenhagen K, Denmark,
https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2006 (last access: 27 May 2021), 2013. a
Farinotti, D., Usselmann, S., Huss, M., Bauder, A., and Funk, M.: Runoff
evolution in the Swiss Alps: Projections for selected high-alpine catchments
based on ENSEMBLES scenarios, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1909–1924, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8276, 2012. a
Ficchi, A., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.: Impact of temporal
resolution of inputs on hydrological model performance: An analysis based on
2400 flood events, J. Hydrol., 538, 454–470, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.016, 2016. a
FOEN: Hydro-CH2018,
https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/en/home/topics/water/info-specialists/state-of-waterbodies/state-of-watercourses/water-flow-and-flow-regime-in-watercourses/climate-change-and-hydrology/hydro-ch2018.html
(last access: 14 January 2020), 2018. a
Gallice, A., Bavay, M., Brauchli, T., Comola, F., Lehning, M., and Huwald, H.: StreamFlow 1.0: an extension to the spatially distributed snow model Alpine3D for hydrological modelling and deterministic stream temperature prediction, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4491–4519,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4491-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Garrick, M., Cunnane, C., and Nash, J. E.: A criterion of efficiency for
rainfall-runoff models, J. Hydrol., 36, 375–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(78)90155-5, 1978. a
Giudici, F., Anghileri, D., Castelletti, A., and Burlando, P.: Descriptive or
normative: How does reservoir operations modeling influence hydrological
simulations under climate change?, J. Hydrol., 595, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125996, 2021. a, b
Gouttevin, I., Lehning, M., Jonas, T., Gustafsson, D., and Mölder, M.: A
two-layer canopy model with thermal inertia for an improved snowpack energy
balance below needleleaf forest (model SNOWPACK, version 3.2.1, revision 741), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2379–2398, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2379-2015, 2015. a
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of
the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009. a
Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional
climate predictions, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1095–1107, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1, 2009. a
Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change, Clim. Dynam., 37, 407–418,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6, 2011. a
Hirashima, H., Nishimura, K., Baba, E., Hachikubo, A., and Lehning, M.:
SNOWPACK model simulations for snow in Hokkaido, Japan, Ann. Glaciol., 38, 123–129, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781815121, 2004. a
Hock, R.: A distributed temperature-index ice- and snowmelt model including
potential direct solar radiation, J. Glaciol., 45, 101–111,
https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000003087, 1999. a, b, c
Hock, R.: Glacier melt: a review of processes and their modelling, Prog. in Phys. Geogr., 29, 362–391, https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp453ra, 2005. a
Huss, M., Farinotti, D., Bauder, A., and Funk, M.: Modelling runoff from highly glacierized alpine drainage basins in a changing climate, Hydrol.
Process., 22, 3888–3902, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7055, 2008. a
IDAWEB: MeteoSwiss, Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatolgy, https://gate.meteoswiss.ch/idaweb/login.do (last access: 28 September 2020), 2019. a
IMIS: WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research, SLF, IMIS measuring
network, https://www.slf.ch/en/avalanche-bulletin-and-snow-situation/measured-values/description-of-automated-stations.html (last access: 28 September 2020), 2019. a
Jacob, D., Petersen, J., Eggert, B., Alias, A., Christensen, O., Bouwer, L.,
Braun, A., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Georgievski, G., Georgopoulou, E., Gobiet, A., Menut, L., Nikulin, G., Haensler, A., Hempelmann, N., Jones, C., Keuler, K., Kovats, S., and Yiou, P.: EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research, Reg. Environ. Change, 14, 563–578, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2, 2014. a, b
Knoben, W. J., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent
benchmark or not? Comparing Nash-Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency
scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Kobierska, F., Jonas, T., Zappa, M., Bavay, M., Magnusson, J., and Bernasconi, S.: Future runoff from a partly glacierized watershed in Central
Switzerland: A two-model approach, Adv. Water Resour, 55, 204–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.024, 2013. a, b, c
Köhler, A., Fischer, J.-T., Scandroglio, R., Bavay, M., McElwaine, J., and Sovilla, B.: Cold-to-warm flow regime transition in snow avalanches, The
Cryosphere, 12, 3759–3774, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3759-2018, 2018. a
Kotlarski, S., Keuler, K., Christensen, O. B., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Jacob, D., Lüthi, D., van Meijgaard, E., Nikulin, G., Schär, C., Teichmann, C., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 7,
1297–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014, 2014. a, b
Legates, D. R. and McCabe, G. J.: Evaluating the use of `goodness-of-fit'
measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35, 233–241, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018, 1999. a, b
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., Russi, T., Stöckli, U., and Zimmerli, M.: SNOWPACK model calculations for avalanche warning based upon a network of
weather and snow stations, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 30, 145–157,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(99)00022-1, 1999. a, b
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., and Fierz, C.: A physical SNOWPACK model
for the Swiss avalanche warning Part III: Meteorological forcing, thin layer
formation and evaluation, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 169–184,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00072-1, 2002. a
Lehning, M., Völksch, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli,
M., and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: a detailed model of mountain surface processes
and its application to snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 20, 2111–2128, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6204, 2006. a, b, c, d
Magnusson, J., Jonas, T., López-Moreno, I., and Lehning, M.: Snow cover
response to climate change in a high alpine and haif-glacierized basin in
Switzerland, Hydrol. Res., 41, 230–240, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2010.115, 2010. a, b, c
Magnusson, J., Farinotti, D., Jonas, T., and Bavay, M.: Quantitative
evaluation of different hydrological modelling approaches in a partly glacierized Swiss watershed, Hydrol. Process., 25, 2071–2084,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7958, 2011. a, b, c, d
Maraun, D.: Nonstationarities of regional climate model biases in European seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051210, 2012. a
Martinec, J. and Rango, A.: Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrological models, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 25, 421–432, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1989.tb03079.x, 1989. a, b, c
Martinec, J. and Rango, A.: Indirect evaluation of snow reserves in
mountain basins, in: XX General Assembly IUGG, IAHS-IUFRO Symposium Snow, Hydrology and Forests in High Alpine Areas, Vienna, 111–119, 1991. a
Maruffi, L., Stucchi, L., Casale, F., and Bocchiola, D.: Soil erosion and
sediment transport under climate change for Mera River, in Italian Alps of
Valchiavenna, Sci. Total Environ., 806, 150651, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150651, 2022. a
Menard, C. B., Essery, R., Krinner, G., Arduini, G., Bartlett, P., Boone, A.,
Brutel-Vuilmet, C., Burke, E., Cuntz, M., Dai, Y., Decharme, B., Dutra, E.,
Fang, X., Fierz, C., Gusev, Y., Hagemann, S., Haverd, V., Kim, H., Lafaysse,
M., Marke, T., Nasonova, O., Nitta, T., Niwano, M., Pomeroy, J., Schädler, G., Semenov, V. A., Smirnova, T., Strasser, U., Swenson, S., Turkov, D., Wever, N., and Yuan, H.: Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E61–E79, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0329.1, 2021. a
MeteoSwiss: CH2011, Swiss Climate Change Scenarios, Technical Report, National Centre for Climate Services, Zurich, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006720559, 2011. a
MeteoSwiss: CH2018, Climate Scenarios for Switzerland, Technical Report,
National Centre for Climate Services, Zurich, https://doi.org/10.18751/Climate/Scenarios/CH2018/1.0, 2018. a, b
Michel, A., Sharma, V., Lehning, M., and Huwald, H.: Dataset for: Climate change scenarios at hourly time-step over Switzerland from an enhanced temporal downscaling approach, EnviDat [data set],
https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.201, 2021c. a
Michel, A., Schaefli, B., Wever, N., Zekollari, H., Lehning, M., and Huwald, H.: Future water temperature of rivers in Switzerland under climate change investigated with physics-based models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1063–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n
Morin, S., Horton, S., Techel, F., Bavay, M., Coléou, C., Fierz, C., Gobiet, A., Hagenmuller, P., Lafaysse, M., Lžar, M., Mitterer, C., Monti, F., Müller, K., Olefs, M., Snook, J. S., van Herwijnen, A., and Vionnet, V.: Application of physical snowpack models in support of operational avalanche hazard forecasting: A status report on current implementations and prospects for the future, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 170, 102910,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102910, 2020. a
Mortezapour, M., Menounos, B., Jackson, P., Erler, A., and Pelto, B.: The role of meteorological forcing and snow model complexity in winter glacier mass balance estimation, Columbia River basin, Canada, Hydrol. Process., 34,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13929, 2020. a
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970. a
Ohmura, A.: Physical Basis for the Temperature-Based Melt-Index Method, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 753–761, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0753:PBFTTB>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Omstedt, A.: A coupled one-dimensional sea ice–ocean model applied to a
semi-enclosed basin, Tellus A, 42, 568–582, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v42i5.11899, 1990. a
Rajczak, J., Kotlarski, S., Salzmann, N., and Schär, C.: Robust climate
scenarios for sites with sparse observations: A two-step bias correction
approach, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 1226–1243, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4417, 2016. a, b, c, d
Rasmus, S., Räisänen, J., and Lehning, M.: Estimating snow conditions in
Finland in the late 21st century using the SNOWPACK model with regional
climate scenario data as input, Ann. Glaciol., 38, 238–244,
https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814843, 2004. a
Richter, B., Schweizer, J., Rotach, M. W., and van Herwijnen, A.: Modeling
spatially distributed snow instability at a regional scale using Alpine3D,
J. Glaciol., 67, 1147–1162, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.61, 2021. a
Rosso, R.: Nash Model Relation to Horton Order Ratios, Water Resour. Res., 20, 914–920, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i007p00914, 1984. a
Sato, A., I. M. S. M. K. T. N. K. N. S. S. T. A. O. K. K. Y. S. and Iwamoto, K.: Construction of snow disaster forecasting system in Japan, Snow Engineering V, 235–238, ISBN 9058096343, 2004. a
Schaefli, B. and Gupta, H.: Do Nash values have value?, Hydrol. Process., 21, 2075–2080, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6825, 2007. a, b, c, d
Schlögl, S., Marty, C., Bavay, M., and Lehning, M.: Sensitivity of Alpine3D modeled snow cover to modifications in DEM resolution, station coverage and meteorological input quantities, Environ. Model. Softw., 83,
387–396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.017, 2016. a, b, c, d
Schlögl, S., Lehning, M., and Mott, R.: How Are Turbulent Sensible Heat Fluxes and Snow Melt Rates Affected by a Changing Snow Cover Fraction?, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 154, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00154, 2018. a
Shakoor, A., Burri, A., Bavay, M., Ejaz, N., Ghumman, A. R., Comola, F., and
Lehning, M.: Hydrological response of two high altitude Swiss catchments to
energy balance and temperature index melt schemes, Polar Sci., 17, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.06.007, 2018. a, b, c
SLF: MeteoIO, https://meteoio.slf.ch/ (last access: 27 June 2022), 2022a. a
SLF: SNOWPACK, https://snowpack.slf.ch/ (last access: 27 June 2022), 2022b. a
SLF: Alpine3D, https://alpine3d.slf.ch/ (last access: 27 June 2022), 2022c. a
SLF: StreamFlow, https://models.slf.ch/p/streamflow/ (last access: 27 June 2022), 2022d. a
Soncini, A., Bocchiola, D., Confortola, G., Minora, U., Vuillermoz, E.,
Salerno, F., Viviano, G., Shrestha, D., Senese, A., Smiraglia, C., and
Diolaiuti, G.: Future hydrological regimes and glacier cover in the Everest
region: The case study of the upper Dudh Koshi basin, Sci. Total Environ., 565, 1084–1101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.138, 2016. a
Stucchi, L., Bombelli, G. M., Bianchi, A., and Bocchiola, D.: Hydropower from
the Alpine Cryosphere in the Era of Climate Change: The Case of the Sabbione
Storage Plant in Italy, Water, 11, 1599, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081599, 2019. a, b
Swiss Federal Office for the Environment: Subdivision de la Suisse en
bassins versants (Bassins versants Suisse), ref: J417-0015,
https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/en/home/topics/water/state/maps/maps-and-evaluations/the-swiss-hydrographic-network.html, last access: 26 June 2020. a
Tarboton, D.: TauDEM, Utah State University, http://hydrology.usu.edu/taudem/taudem5/ (last access: 26 June 2020), 1997. a
Terzago, S., Andreoli, V., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Campo, L., Cassardo, C.,
Cremonese, E., Dolia, D., Gabellani, S., Hardenberg, J., Morra di Cella, U.,
Palazzi, E., Piazzi, G., Pogliotti, P., and Provenzale, A.: Sensitivity of
snow models to the accuracy of meteorological forcings in mountain
environments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4061–4090,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4061-2020, 2020.
a, b, c
Viviroli, D., Zappa, M., Gurtz, J., and Weingartner, R.: An introduction to the hydrological modelling system PREVAH and its pre- and post-processing-tools, Environ. Model. Softw., 24, 1209–1222,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.001, 2009. a
von Rütte, F., Kahl, A., Rohrer, J., and Lehning, M.: How Forward-Scattering Snow and Terrain Change the Alpine Radiation Balance With Application to Solar Panels, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034333, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034333, 2021. a
Wever, N., Comola, F., Bavay, M., and Lehning, M.: Simulating the influence of snow surface processes on soil moisture dynamics and streamflow generation in an alpine catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4053–4071,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4053-2017, 2017. a, b
Wever, N., Maksym, T., White, S., and Leonard, K. C.: Ice mass balance
data PS81/517 from Weddell Sea, Antarctica, 2013, PANGEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.933424, 2021. a
Würzer, S., Wever, N., Juras, R., Lehning, M., and Jonas, T.: Modelling
liquid water transport in snow under rain-on-snow conditions – considering
preferential flow, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1741–1756,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1741-2017, 2017. a
Yvon-Durocher, G., Allen, A. P., Montoya, J. M., Trimmer, M., and Woodward, G.: The Temperature Dependence of the Carbon Cycle in Aquatic Ecosystems, Adv. Ecol. Res., 43, 267–313, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385005-8.00007-1, 2010. a
Zappa, M., Pos, F., Strasser, U., Warmerdam, P., and Gurtz, J.: Seasonal water balance of an Alpine Catchment as Evaluated by different methods for
spatially distributed snowmelt modelling, Nord. Hydrol., 34, 179–202,
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2003.0003, 2003. a, b, c, d
Zekollari, H., Huss, M., and Farinotti, D.: Modelling the future evolution of
glaciers in the European Alps under the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, The
Cryosphere, 13, 1125–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1125-2019, 2019. a, b
Zhang, S., Ye, B., Liu, S., Zhang, X., and Hagemann, S.: A modified monthly
degree-day model for evaluating glacier runoff changes in China. Part I:
model development, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1686–1696, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8286, 2012. a
Short summary
High Alpine catchments are dominated by the melting of seasonal snow cover and glaciers, whose amount and seasonality are expected to be modified by climate change. This paper compares the performances of different types of models in reproducing discharge among two catchments under present conditions and climate change. Despite many advantages, the use of simpler models for climate change applications is controversial as they do not fully represent the physics of the involved processes.
High Alpine catchments are dominated by the melting of seasonal snow cover and glaciers, whose...