Articles | Volume 22, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4329-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4329-2018
Research article
 | 
16 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 16 Aug 2018

Evaluation of Doppler radar and GTS data assimilation for NWP rainfall prediction of an extreme summer storm in northern China: from the hydrological perspective

Jia Liu, Jiyang Tian, Denghua Yan, Chuanzhe Li, Fuliang Yu, and Feifei Shen

Related authors

A coupled atmospheric–hydrologic modeling system with variable grid sizes for rainfall–runoff simulation in semi-humid and semi-arid watersheds: how does the coupling scale affects the results?
Jiyang Tian, Jia Liu, Yang Wang, Wei Wang, Chuanzhe Li, and Chunqi Hu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3933–3949, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3933-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3933-2020, 2020
Short summary
The use of an integrated variable fuzzy sets in water resources management
Qingtai Qiu, Jia Liu, Chuanzhe Li, Xinzhe Yu, and Yang Wang
Proc. IAHS, 379, 249–253, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-249-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-249-2018, 2018
Numerical rainfall simulation with different spatial and temporal evenness by using a WRF multiphysics ensemble
Jiyang Tian, Jia Liu, Denghua Yan, Chuanzhe Li, and Fuliang Yu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 563–579, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-563-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-563-2017, 2017
Short summary
On selection of the optimal data time interval for real-time hydrological forecasting
J. Liu and D. Han
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3639–3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3639-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3639-2013, 2013
A study on WRF radar data assimilation for hydrological rainfall prediction
J. Liu, M. Bray, and D. Han
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3095–3110, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3095-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3095-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
The role of land–atmosphere coupling in subseasonal surface air temperature prediction across the contiguous United States
Yuna Lim, Andrea M. Molod, Randal D. Koster, and Joseph A. Santanello
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3435–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3435-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3435-2025, 2025
Short summary
Barriers to urban hydrometeorological simulation: a review
Xuan Chen, Job Augustijn van der Werf, Arjan Droste, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3447–3480, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3447-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3447-2025, 2025
Short summary
Global catalog of soil moisture droughts over the past four decades
Jan Řehoř, Rudolf Brázdil, Oldřich Rakovec, Martin Hanel, Milan Fischer, Rohini Kumar, Jan Balek, Markéta Poděbradská, Vojtěch Moravec, Luis Samaniego, Yannis Markonis, and Miroslav Trnka
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3341–3358, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3341-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3341-2025, 2025
Short summary
Probabilistic precipitation downscaling for ungauged mountain sites: a pilot study for the Hindu Kush Himalaya
Marc Girona-Mata, Andrew Orr, Martin Widmann, Daniel Bannister, Ghulam Hussain Dars, Scott Hosking, Jesse Norris, David Ocio, Tony Phillips, Jakob Steiner, and Richard E. Turner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3073–3100, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3073-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3073-2025, 2025
Short summary
Implementation of global soil databases in the Noah-MP model and the effects on simulated mean and extreme soil hydrothermal changes
Kazeem Abiodun Ishola, Gerald Mills, Ankur Prabhat Sati, Benjamin Obe, Matthias Demuzere, Deepak Upreti, Gourav Misra, Paul Lewis, Daire Walsh, Tim McCarthy, and Rowan Fealy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2551–2582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2551-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2551-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdalla, S. and Cavaleri, L.: Effect of wind variability and variable air density on wave modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 17-1–17-17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000639, 2002. 
Abhilash, S., Sahai, A. K., Mohankumar, K., George, J. P., and Das, S.: Assimilation of doppler weather radar radial velocity and reflectivity observations in WRF-3DVAR system for short-range forecasting of convective storms, Pure Appl. Geophys., 169, 2047–2070, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0462-z, 2012. 
Aligo, E. A., Gallus, W. A., and Segal, M.: On the impact of WRF model vertical grid resolution on Midwest summer rainfall forecasts, Weather Forecast., 24, 575–594, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2007101.1, 2009. 
Barker, D. M., Huang, W., Guo, Y. R., Bourgeois, A., and Xiao, Q. N.: A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for MM5: implementation and initial results, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 897–914, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0897:ATVDAS>2.0.CO;2, 2004. 
Bauer, H. S., Schwitalla, T., Wulfmeyer, V., Bakhshall, A., Ehret, U., Neuper, M., and Caumont, O.: Quantitative precipitation estimation based on high-resolution numerical weather prediction and data assimilation with WRF – a performance test, Tellus A, 67, 25047, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v67.25047, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
Both radar reflectivity and GTS data are good choices for assimilation in improving high-resolution rainfall of the NWP systems, which always fails in providing satisfactory rainfall products for hydrological use. Simultaneously assimilating GTS and radar data always performs better than assimilating radar data alone. The assimilation efficiency of the GTS data is higher than both radar reflectivity and radial velocity considering the number of data assimilated and its effect.
Share