Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1473-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1473-2018
Review article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
28 Feb 2018
Review article | Highlight paper |  | 28 Feb 2018

Citizen observations contributing to flood modelling: opportunities and challenges

Thaine H. Assumpção, Ioana Popescu, Andreja Jonoski, and Dimitri P. Solomatine

Related authors

Probabilistic Hierarchical Interpolation and Interpretable Configuration for Flood Prediction
Mostafa Saberian, Vidya Samadi, and Ioana Popescu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-261,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-261, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Robust multi-objective optimization under multiple uncertainties using the CM-ROPAR approach: case study of water resources allocation in the Huaihe River basin
Jitao Zhang, Dimitri Solomatine, and Zengchuan Dong
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3739–3753, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surface-subsurface interaction analysis and the influence of precipitation spatial variability on a lowland mesoscale catchment
Faisal Sardar, Muhammad Haris Ali, Ioana Popescu, Andreja Jonoski, Schalk Jan van Andel, and Claudia Bertini
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-276,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-276, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Multivariate regression trees as an “explainable machine learning” approach to explore relationships between hydroclimatic characteristics and agricultural and hydrological drought severity: case of study Cesar River basin
Ana Paez-Trujilo, Jeffer Cañon, Beatriz Hernandez, Gerald Corzo, and Dimitri Solomatine
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3863–3883, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3863-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3863-2023, 2023
Short summary
An integrated modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of nature-based solutions of flood mitigation across a small watershed in the southeast United States
Betina I. Guido, Ioana Popescu, Vidya Samadi, and Biswa Bhattacharya
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2663–2681, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2663-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2663-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Rivers and Lakes | Techniques and Approaches: Instruments and observation techniques
Hydrological, meteorological, and watershed controls on the water balance of thermokarst lakes between Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk, Northwest Territories, Canada
Evan J. Wilcox, Brent B. Wolfe, and Philip Marsh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2173–2188, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2173-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Influence of vegetation maintenance on flow and mixing: case study comparing fully cut with high-coverage conditions
Monika Barbara Kalinowska, Kaisa Västilä, Michael Nones, Adam Kiczko, Emilia Karamuz, Andrzej Brandyk, Adam Kozioł, and Marcin Krukowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 953–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-953-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Assessing the influence of lake and watershed attributes on snowmelt bypass at thermokarst lakes
Evan J. Wilcox, Brent B. Wolfe, and Philip Marsh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6185–6205, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6185-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6185-2022, 2022
Short summary
Technical note: Analyzing river network dynamics and the active length–discharge relationship using water presence sensors
Francesca Zanetti, Nicola Durighetto, Filippo Vingiani, and Gianluca Botter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3497–3516, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3497-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3497-2022, 2022
Short summary
Technical note: Efficient imaging of hydrological units below lakes and fjords with a floating, transient electromagnetic (FloaTEM) system
Pradip Kumar Maurya, Frederik Ersted Christensen, Masson Andy Kass, Jesper B. Pedersen, Rasmus R. Frederiksen, Nikolaj Foged, Anders Vest Christiansen, and Esben Auken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2813–2827, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2813-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2813-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Albrecht, F., Zussner, M., Perger, C., Durauer, M., See, L., McCallum, I., Fritz, S., and Kainz, W.: Using student volunteers to crowdsource land cover information, in: GI_Forum 2014. Geospatial Innovation for Society – Conference Proceedings, edited by: Vogler, R., Car, A., Strobl, J., and Griesebner, G., Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna, Austria, 314–317, 2014. 
Alfonso, L., Lobbrecht, A., and Price, R.: Using mobile phones to validate models of extreme events, in: 9th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Tianjin, China, 1447–1454, 2010. 
Alfonso, L., Chacón, J. C., and Peña-Castellanos, G.: Allowing citizens to effortlessly become rainfall sensors, in: E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress, The Hague, the Netherlands, 28 June–3 July, 2015. 
Aspuru, I., García, I., Herranz, K., and Santander, A.: CITI-SENSE: methods and tools for empowering citizens to observe acoustic comfort in outdoor public spaces, Noise Mappin, 3, 37–48, https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2016-0003, 2016. 
Aulov, O., Price, A., and Halem, M.: AsonMaps: a platform for aggregation visualization and analysis of disaster related human sensor network observations, in: ISCRAM 2014 Proceedings – 11th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Pennsylvania, USA, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Citizens can contribute to science by providing data, analysing them and as such contributing to decision-making processes. For example, citizens have collected water levels from gauges, which are important when simulating/forecasting floods, where data are usually scarce. This study reviewed such contributions and concluded that integration of citizen data may not be easy due to their spatio-temporal characteristics but that citizen data still proved valuable and can be used in flood modelling.