Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1299–1315, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1299–1315, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018

Research article 20 Feb 2018

Research article | 20 Feb 2018

Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model

Mehmet C. Demirel et al.

Related authors

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM DRIVES DISAGREEMENT AMONG BRAZILIAN VEGETATION MAPS AT A SAMPLE AREA OF THE SEMIARID CAATINGA
E. Bontempo, M. C. Demirel, C. Corsini, F. Martins, and D. Valeriano
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W12-2020, 201–206, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-201-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-201-2020, 2020
Selection of multi-model ensemble of general circulation models for the simulation of precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature based on spatial assessment metrics
Kamal Ahmed, Dhanapala A. Sachindra, Shamsuddin Shahid, Mehmet C. Demirel, and Eun-Sung Chung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4803–4824, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019, 2019
Short summary
The SPAtial EFficiency metric (SPAEF): multiple-component evaluation of spatial patterns for optimization of hydrological models
Julian Koch, Mehmet Cüneyd Demirel, and Simon Stisen
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1873–1886, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1873-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1873-2018, 2018
Short summary
The skill of seasonal ensemble low-flow forecasts in the Moselle River for three different hydrological models
M. C. Demirel, M. J. Booij, and A. Y. Hoekstra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 275–291, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-275-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-275-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
In-stream Escherichia coli modeling using high-temporal-resolution data with deep learning and process-based models
Ather Abbas, Sangsoo Baek, Norbert Silvera, Bounsamay Soulileuth, Yakov Pachepsky, Olivier Ribolzi, Laurie Boithias, and Kyung Hwa Cho
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6185–6202, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6185-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6185-2021, 2021
Short summary
Can we use precipitation isotope outputs of isotopic general circulation models to improve hydrological modeling in large mountainous catchments on the Tibetan Plateau?
Yi Nan, Zhihua He, Fuqiang Tian, Zhongwang Wei, and Lide Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6151–6172, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6151-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6151-2021, 2021
Short summary
Small-scale topography explains patterns and dynamics of dissolved organic carbon exports from the riparian zone of a temperate, forested catchment
Benedikt J. Werner, Oliver J. Lechtenfeld, Andreas Musolff, Gerrit H. de Rooij, Jie Yang, Ralf Gründling, Ulrike Werban, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6067–6086, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Effects of spatial resolution of terrain models on modelled discharge and soil loss in Oaxaca, Mexico
Sergio Naranjo, Francelino A. Rodrigues Jr., Georg Cadisch, Santiago Lopez-Ridaura, Mariela Fuentes Ponce, and Carsten Marohn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5561–5588, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5561-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5561-2021, 2021
Short summary
Benchmarking data-driven rainfall–runoff models in Great Britain: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models with four lumped conceptual models
Thomas Lees, Marcus Buechel, Bailey Anderson, Louise Slater, Steven Reece, Gemma Coxon, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5517–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, http://www.fao.org/docrep/x0490e/x0490e00.htm (last access: 16 February 2018), 1998.
Berezowski, T., Nossent, J., Chormański, J., and Batelaan, O.: Spatial sensitivity analysis of snow cover data in a distributed rainfall-runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1887–1904, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1887-2015, 2015.
Beven, K. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8, 2001.
Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., and Saltelli, A.: An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models, Environ. Model. Softw., 22, 1509–1518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004, 2007.
Chen, J. M., Chen, X., Ju, W., and Geng, X.: Distributed hydrological model for mapping evapotranspiration using remote sensing inputs, J. Hydrol., 305, 15–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.029, 2005.
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Satellite data offer great opportunities to improve spatial model predictions by means of spatially oriented model evaluations. In this study, satellite images are used to observe spatial patterns of evapotranspiration at the land surface. These spatial patterns are utilized in combination with streamflow observations in a model calibration framework including a novel spatial performance metric tailored to target the spatial pattern performance of a catchment-scale hydrological model.