Technical note
12 Dec 2014
Technical note | 12 Dec 2014
Technical Note: Reducing the spin-up time of integrated surface water–groundwater models
H. Ajami et al.
Related authors
On the non-stationarity of hydrological response in anthropogenically unaffected catchments: an Australian perspective
Hoori Ajami, Ashish Sharma, Lawrence E. Band, Jason P. Evans, Narendra K. Tuteja, Gnanathikkam E. Amirthanathan, and Mohammed A. Bari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 281–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-281-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-281-2017, 2017
Short summary
The INTENSE project: using observations and models to understand the past, present and future of sub-daily rainfall extremes
Stephen Blenkinsop, Hayley J. Fowler, Renaud Barbero, Steven C. Chan, Selma B. Guerreiro, Elizabeth Kendon, Geert Lenderink, Elizabeth Lewis, Xiao-Feng Li, Seth Westra, Lisa Alexander, Richard P. Allan, Peter Berg, Robert J. H. Dunn, Marie Ekström, Jason P. Evans, Greg Holland, Richard Jones, Erik Kjellström, Albert Klein-Tank, Dennis Lettenmaier, Vimal Mishra, Andreas F. Prein, Justin Sheffield, and Mari R. Tye
Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 117–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-117-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-117-2018, 2018
Short summary
Estimating grassland curing with remotely sensed data
Wasin Chaivaranont, Jason P. Evans, Yi Y. Liu, and Jason J. Sharples
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1535–1554, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1535-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1535-2018, 2018
Short summary
Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model
Mehmet C. Demirel, Juliane Mai, Gorka Mendiguren, Julian Koch, Luis Samaniego, and Simon Stisen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018, 2018
Short summary
Hydroclimatic variability and predictability: a survey of recent research
Randal D. Koster, Alan K. Betts, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Marc Bierkens, Katrina E. Bennett, Stephen J. Déry, Jason P. Evans, Rong Fu, Felipe Hernandez, L. Ruby Leung, Xu Liang, Muhammad Masood, Hubert Savenije, Guiling Wang, and Xing Yuan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3777–3798, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3777-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3777-2017, 2017
Short summary
On the non-stationarity of hydrological response in anthropogenically unaffected catchments: an Australian perspective
Hoori Ajami, Ashish Sharma, Lawrence E. Band, Jason P. Evans, Narendra K. Tuteja, Gnanathikkam E. Amirthanathan, and Mohammed A. Bari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 281–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-281-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-281-2017, 2017
Short summary
How does bias correction of regional climate model precipitation affect modelled runoff?
J. Teng, N. J. Potter, F. H. S. Chiew, L. Zhang, B. Wang, J. Vaze, and J. P. Evans
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 711–728, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-711-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-711-2015, 2015
Short summary
Implementation of a soil albedo scheme in the CABLEv1.4b land surface model and evaluation against MODIS estimates over Australia
J. Kala, J. P. Evans, A. J. Pitman, C. B. Schaaf, M. Decker, C. Carouge, D. Mocko, and Q. Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2121–2140, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2121-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2121-2014, 2014
Design of a regional climate modelling projection ensemble experiment – NARCliM
J. P. Evans, F. Ji, C. Lee, P. Smith, D. Argüeso, and L. Fita
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 621–629, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-621-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-621-2014, 2014
Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis
B. Mueller, M. Hirschi, C. Jimenez, P. Ciais, P. A. Dirmeyer, A. J. Dolman, J. B. Fisher, M. Jung, F. Ludwig, F. Maignan, D. G. Miralles, M. F. McCabe, M. Reichstein, J. Sheffield, K. Wang, E. F. Wood, Y. Zhang, and S. I. Seneviratne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3707–3720, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Hydrological evaluation of open-access precipitation data using SWAT at multiple temporal and spatial scales
Jianzhuang Pang, Huilan Zhang, Quanxi Xu, Yujie Wang, Yunqi Wang, Ouyang Zhang, and Jiaxin Hao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3603–3626, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3603-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3603-2020, 2020
Short summary
Understanding coastal wetland conditions and futures by closing their hydrologic balance: the case of the Gialova lagoon, Greece
Stefano Manzoni, Giorgos Maneas, Anna Scaini, Basil E. Psiloglou, Georgia Destouni, and Steve W. Lyon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3557–3571, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3557-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3557-2020, 2020
Short summary
Crossing hydrological and geochemical modeling to understand the spatiotemporal variability of water chemistry in a headwater catchment (Strengbach, France)
Julien Ackerer, Benjamin Jeannot, Frederick Delay, Sylvain Weill, Yann Lucas, Bertrand Fritz, Daniel Viville, and François Chabaux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3111–3133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3111-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3111-2020, 2020
On the shape of forward transit time distributions in low-order catchments
Ingo Heidbüchel, Jie Yang, Andreas Musolff, Peter Troch, Ty Ferré, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2895–2920, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2895-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2895-2020, 2020
Short summary
Multistep-ahead daily inflow forecasting using the ERA-Interim reanalysis data set based on gradient-boosting regression trees
Shengli Liao, Zhanwei Liu, Benxi Liu, Chuntian Cheng, Xinfeng Jin, and Zhipeng Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2343–2363, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2343-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2343-2020, 2020
Short summary
Dynamics of hydrological-model parameters: mechanisms, problems and solutions
Tian Lan, Kairong Lin, Chong-Yu Xu, Xuezhi Tan, and Xiaohong Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1347–1366, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1347-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1347-2020, 2020
On the configuration and initialization of a large-scale hydrological land surface model to represent permafrost
Mohamed E. Elshamy, Daniel Princz, Gonzalo Sapriza-Azuri, Mohamed S. Abdelhamed, Al Pietroniro, Howard S. Wheater, and Saman Razavi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 349–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-349-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-349-2020, 2020
Short summary
Future shifts in extreme flow regimes in Alpine regions
Manuela I. Brunner, Daniel Farinotti, Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4471–4489, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4471-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4471-2019, 2019
Short summary
Hydrodynamic simulation of the effects of stable in-channel large wood on the flood hydrographs of a low mountain range creek, Ore Mountains, Germany
Daniel Rasche, Christian Reinhardt-Imjela, Achim Schulte, and Robert Wenzel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4349–4365, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4349-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4349-2019, 2019
Short summary
Niger discharge from radar altimetry: bridging gaps between gauge and altimetry time series
Stefan Schröder, Anne Springer, Jürgen Kusche, Bernd Uebbing, Luciana Fenoglio-Marc, Bernd Diekkrüger, and Thomas Poméon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4113–4128, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4113-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4113-2019, 2019
Short summary
Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain
Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim E. Freer, Thorsten Wagener, Penny J. Johnes, John P. Bloomfield, Sheila Greene, Christopher J. A. Macleod, and Sim M. Reaney
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4011–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019, 2019
Short summary
Quantification of different flow components in a high-altitude glacierized catchment (Dudh Koshi, Himalaya): some cryospheric-related issues
Louise Mimeau, Michel Esteves, Isabella Zin, Hans-Werner Jacobi, Fanny Brun, Patrick Wagnon, Devesh Koirala, and Yves Arnaud
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3969–3996, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3969-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3969-2019, 2019
Short summary
Global sinusoidal seasonality in precipitation isotopes
Scott T. Allen, Scott Jasechko, Wouter R. Berghuijs, Jeffrey M. Welker, Gregory R. Goldsmith, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3423–3436, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3423-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3423-2019, 2019
Short summary
Improving hydrological projection performance under contrasting climatic conditions using spatial coherence through a hierarchical Bayesian regression framework
Zhengke Pan, Pan Liu, Shida Gao, Jun Xia, Jie Chen, and Lei Cheng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3405–3421, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3405-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3405-2019, 2019
Short summary
A multi-objective ensemble approach to hydrological modelling in the UK: an application to historic drought reconstruction
Katie A. Smith, Lucy J. Barker, Maliko Tanguy, Simon Parry, Shaun Harrigan, Tim P. Legg, Christel Prudhomme, and Jamie Hannaford
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3247–3268, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3247-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3247-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessing the added value of the Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research (ICAR) model for precipitation in complex topography
Johannes Horak, Marlis Hofer, Fabien Maussion, Ethan Gutmann, Alexander Gohm, and Mathias W. Rotach
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2715–2734, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2715-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2715-2019, 2019
Short summary
Distributive rainfall–runoff modelling to understand runoff-to-baseflow proportioning and its impact on the determination of reserve requirements of the Verlorenvlei estuarine lake, west coast, South Africa
Andrew Watson, Jodie Miller, Manfred Fink, Sven Kralisch, Melanie Fleischer, and Willem de Clercq
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2679–2697, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2679-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2679-2019, 2019
Short summary
Mapping soil hydraulic properties using random-forest-based pedotransfer functions and geostatistics
Brigitta Szabó, Gábor Szatmári, Katalin Takács, Annamária Laborczi, András Makó, Kálmán Rajkai, and László Pásztor
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2615–2635, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2615-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2615-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles
Ajami, H., McCabe, M. F., Evans, J. P., and Stisen, S.: Assessing the impact of model spin-up on surface water–groundwater interactions using an integrated hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2636–2656, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014258, 2014.
Ashby, S. F. and Falgout, R. D.: A parallel multigrid preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 124, 145–159, 1996.
Berthet, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Javelle, P.: How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 819–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-819-2009, 2009.
Cloke, H. L., Renaud, J. P., Claxton, A. J., McDonnell, J. J., Anderson, M. G., Blake, J. R., and Bates, P. D.: The effect of model configuration on modelled hillslope–riparian interactions, J. Hydrol., 279, 167–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00177-X, 2003.
Dai, Y., Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Baker, I., Bonan, G. B., Bosilovich, M. G., Denning, A. S., Dirmeyer, P. A., Houser, P. R., Niu, G., Oleson, K. W., Schlosser, C. A., and Yang, Z. L.: The Common Land Model, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, 2003.
Decker, M., Pitman, A. J., and Evans, J. P.: Groundwater constraints on simulated transpiration variability over southeastern Australian forests, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 543–559, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-058.1, 2012.
Ferguson, I. M. and Maxwell, R. M.: Role of groundwater in watershed response and land surface feedbacks under climate change, Water Resour. Res., 46, W00F02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008616, 2010.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., and Entekhabi, D.: Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model, Water Resour. Res., 40, W11102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003218, 2004.
Jones, J. E. and Woodward, C. S.: Newton–Krylov-multigrid solvers for large-scale, highly heterogeneous, variably saturated flow problems, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 763–774, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1708(00)00075-0, 2001.
Jones, J. P., Sudicky, E. A., and McLaren, R. G.: Application of a fully-integrated surface–subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: a case study, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005603, 2008.
Kim, C. P., Stricker, J. N. M., and Feddes, R. A.: Impact of soil heterogeneitoy on the water budget of the unsaturated zone, Water Resour. Res., 33, 991–999, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00364, 1997.
Kollet, S. J. and Maxwell, R. M.: Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 945–958, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006, 2006.
Kollet, S. J. and Maxwell, R. M.: Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W02402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006004, 2008.
Maxwell, R. M.: A terrain-following grid transform and preconditioner for parallel, large-scale, integrated hydrologic modeling, Adv. Water Resour., 53, 109–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.10.001, 2013.
Maxwell, R. M. and Miller, N. L.: Development of a coupled land surface and groundwater model, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 233–247, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM422.1, 2005.
Maxwell, R. M., Putti, M., Meyerhoff, S., Delfs, J., Ferguson, I. M., Ivanov, V., Kim, J., Kolditz, O., Kollet, S. J., Kumar, M., Lopez, S., Niu, J., Paniconi, C., Park, Y., Phanikumar, M. S., Shen, C., Sudicky, E. A., and Sulis, M.: Surface-subsurface model intercomparison: A first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 50, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013725, 2014.
Noto, L. V., Ivanov, V. Y., Bras, R. L., and Vivoni, E. R.: Effects of initialization on response of a fully-distributed hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 352, 107–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.12.031, 2008.
Refsgaard, J. C.: Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 198, 69–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03329-x, 1997.
Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Wood, E. F.: On hydrologic similarity: 2. A scaled model of storm runoff production, Water Resour. Res., 23, 2266–2278, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i012p02266, 1987.
Stisen, S., Sonnenborg, T. O., Hojberg, A. L., Troldborg, L., and Refsgaard, J. C.: Evaluation of climate input biases and water balance issues using a coupled surface–subsurface model, Vadose Zone J., 10, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0001, 2011.
Troch, P. A., Mancini, M., Paniconi, C., and Wood, E. F.: Evaluation of a distributed catchment scale water balance model, Water Resour. Res., 29, 1805–1817, https://doi.org/10.1029/93wr00398, 1993.
Weill, S., Altissimo, M., Cassiani, G., Deiana, R., Marani, M., and Putti, M.: Saturated area dynamics and streamflow generation from coupled surface–subsurface simulations and field observations, Adv. Water Resour., 59, 196–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.06.007, 2013.
