Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2205–2227, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2205–2227, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011

Research article 14 Jul 2011

Research article | 14 Jul 2011

Calibration of hydrological models using flow-duration curves

I. K. Westerberg et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Key challenges facing the application of the conductivity mass balance method: a case study of the Mississippi River basin
Hang Lyu, Chenxi Xia, Jinghan Zhang, and Bo Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 6075–6090, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6075-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6075-2020, 2020
Short summary
Coupled machine learning and the limits of acceptability approach applied in parameter identification for a distributed hydrological model
Aynom T. Teweldebrhan, Thomas V. Schuler, John F. Burkhart, and Morten Hjorth-Jensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4641–4658, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4641-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4641-2020, 2020
A systematic assessment of uncertainties in large-scale soil loss estimation from different representations of USLE input factors – a case study for Kenya and Uganda
Christoph Schürz, Bano Mehdi, Jens Kiesel, Karsten Schulz, and Mathew Herrnegger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4463–4489, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4463-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4463-2020, 2020
Short summary
Technical note: Uncertainty in multi-source partitioning using large tracer data sets
Alicia Correa, Diego Ochoa-Tocachi, and Christian Birkel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5059–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5059-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5059-2019, 2019
Short summary
Assessment of climate change impact and difference on the river runoff in four basins in China under 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming
Hongmei Xu, Lüliu Liu, Yong Wang, Sheng Wang, Ying Hao, Jingjin Ma, and Tong Jiang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4219–4231, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4219-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4219-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO, 300 p., 1998.
Ambroise, B., Freer, J., and Beven, K.: Application of a generalized TOPMODEL to the small Ringelbach catchment, Vosges, France, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2147–2159, 1996.
Aronica, G. T., Candela, A., Viola, F., and Cannarozzo, M.: Influence of rating curve uncertainty on daily rainfall-runoff model predictions., in: Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Promise and Progress, edited by: Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., Uhlenbrook, S., Liang, X., Lakshmi, V., Kumar, P., Zehe, E., and Tachikawa, Y., IAHS Publ 303, 116–124, 2006.
Bell, V. A. and Moore, R. J.: The sensitivity of catchment runoff models to rainfall data at different spatial scales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 653–667, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-653-2000, 2000.
Beven, K. J.: Changing Ideas in Hydrology - the Case of Physically-Based Models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157–172, 1989.
Download