Chen, L., Deng, J., Yang, W., and Chen, H.: Hydrological modelling of large-scale karst-dominated basin using a grid-based distributed karst hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 628, 130459, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130459, 2024.
Chen, X., Zhang, K., Luo, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhou, J., Fan, Y., Huang, P., Yao, C., Chao, L., and Bao, H.: A distributed hydrological model for semi-humid watersheds with a thick unsaturated zone under strong anthropogenic impacts: a case study in Haihe river basin, J. Hydrol., 623, 129765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129765, 2023.
Clark, M. P. and Kavetski, D.: Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Fidelity and efficiency of time stepping schemes, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10510, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008894, 2010.
Clark, M. P., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., Adam, J. C., Bolster, D., Gochis, D. J., Hooper, R. P., Kumar, M., Leung, L. R., Mackay, D. S., Maxwell, R. M., Shen, C., Swenson, S. C., and Zeng, X.: Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in earth system models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5929–5956, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017096, 2015.
Clark, M. P., Schaefli, B., Schymanski, S. J., Samaniego, L., Luce, C. H., Jackson, B. M., Freer, J. E., Arnold, J. R., Moore, R. D., Istanbulluoglu, E., and Ceola, S.: Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 52, 2350–2365, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017910, 2016.
Di Giammarco, P., Todini, E., and Lamberti, P.: A conservative finite elements approach to overland flow: the control volume finite element formulation, J. Hydrol., 175, 267–291, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80014-X, 1996.
Dongarra, J. and Keyes, D.: The co-evolution of computational physics and high-performance computing, Nat. Rev. Phys., 6, 621–627, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00750-z, 2024.
Fang, Y.-H., Zhang, X., Corbari, C., Mancini, M., Niu, G.-Y., and Zeng, W.: Improving the Xin'anjiang hydrological model based on mass–energy balance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3359–3375, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3359-2017, 2017.
Fatichi, S., Vivoni, E. R., Ogden, F. L., Ivanov, V. Y., Mirus, B., Gochis, D., Downer, C. W., Camporese, M., Davison, J. H., Ebel, B., Jones, N., Kim, J., Mascaro, G., Niswonger, R., Restrepo, P., Rigon, R., Shen, C., Sulis, M., and Tarboton, D.: An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology, J. Hydrol., 537, 45–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026, 2016.
Freeze, R. A. and Harlan, R. L.: Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model, J. Hydrol., 9, 237–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(69)90020-1, 1969.
Gong, W., Duan, Q., Li, J., Wang, C., Di, Z., Ye, A., Miao, C., and Dai, Y.: An intercomparison of sampling methods for uncertainty quantification of environmental dynamic models, J. Environ. Inform., 28, 11–24, https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201500310, 2015.
Gottardi, G. and Venutelli, M.: An accurate time integration method for simplified overland flow models, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 173–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.08.004, 2008.
Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., and Ye, M.: Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy, Water Resour. Res., 48, W08301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011044, 2012.
He, C., Valayamkunnath, P., Barlage, M., Chen, F., Gochis, D., Cabell, R., Schneider, T., Rasmussen, R., Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Niyogi, D., and Ek, M.: Modernizing the open-source community Noah with multi-parameterization options (Noah-MP) land surface model (version 5.0) with enhanced modularity, interoperability, and applicability, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5131–5151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5131-2023, 2023.
Hodson, T. O.: Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5481–5487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022, 2022.
Höge, M., Scheidegger, A., Baity-Jesi, M., Albert, C., and Fenicia, F.: Improving hydrologic models for predictions and process understanding using neural ODEs, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5085–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, 2022.
Hong, S. and Mostaghimi, S.: Comparison of 1-D and 2-D modeling of overland runoff and sediment transport, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 33, 1103–1116, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04128.x, 1997.
Jackson, E. K., Roberts, W., Nelsen, B., Williams, G. P., Nelson, E. J., and Ames, D. P.: Introductory overview: error metrics for hydrologic modelling – a review of common practices and an open source library to facilitate use and adoption, Environ. Modell. Softw., 119, 32–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.001, 2019.
Jain, M. K. and Singh, V. P.: DEM-based modelling of surface runoff using diffusion wave equation, J. Hydrol., 302, 107–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.042, 2005.
Kampf, S. K. and Burges, S. J.: A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 43, W05423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005370, 2007.
Kavetski, D. and Clark, M. P.: Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 2. Impact of time stepping schemes on model analysis and prediction, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10511, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008896, 2010.
Kazezyılmaz-Alhan, C. M. and Medina, M. A.: Kinematic and diffusion waves: analytical and numerical solutions to overland and channel flow, J. Hydraul. Eng., 133, 217–228, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:2(217), 2007.
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., Peel, M. C., Fowler, K. J. A., and Woods, R. A.: A brief analysis of conceptual model structure uncertainty using 36 models and 559 catchments, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025975, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025975, 2020.
Kollet, S., Sulis, M., Maxwell, R. M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., Bertoldi, G., Coon, E. T., Cordano, E., Endrizzi, S., Kikinzon, E., Mouche, E., Mügler, C., Park, Y., Refsgaard, J. C., Stisen, S., and Sudicky, E.: The integrated hydrologic model intercomparison project, IH-MIP2: a second set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 53, 867–890, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019191, 2017.
La Follette, P. T., Teuling, A. J., Addor, N., Clark, M., Jansen, K., and Melsen, L. A.: Numerical daemons of hydrological models are summoned by extreme precipitation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5425–5446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5425-2021, 2021.
Lam, S. K., Pitrou, A., and Seibert, S.: Numba: a LLVM-based Python JIT compiler, in: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC, Austin, Texas, 15 November 2015, 7, https://doi.org/10.1145/2833157.2833162, 2015.
Li, B., Sun, T., Tian, F., Tudaji, M., Qin, L., and Ni, G.: Hybrid hydrological modeling for large alpine basins: a semi-distributed approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4521–4538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024, 2024.
Liu, J., Chen, X., Zhang, J., and Flury, M.: Coupling the Xinanjiang model to a kinematic flow model based on digital drainage networks for flood forecasting, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1337–1348, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7255, 2009.
Liu, Q. Q., Chen, L., Li, J. C., and Singh, V. P.: Two-dimensional kinematic wave model of overland-flow, J. Hydrol., 291, 28–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.023, 2004.
Loritz, R., Hrachowitz, M., Neuper, M., and Zehe, E.: The role and value of distributed precipitation data in hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 147–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-147-2021, 2021.
Lu, M., Kioke, T., and Hayakawa, N.: Distributed XinAnJiang model using radar measured rainfall data, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Water Resources & Environmental Research: Towards the 21st Century, Kyoto, Japan, 29–31 October 1996, 29–36,
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571417125513518464 (last access: 11 August 2025), 1996.
MacCormack, R. W.: A numerical method for solving the equations of compressible viscous flow, AIAA J., 20, 1275–1281, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.51188, 1982.
Maxwell, R. M., Putti, M., Meyerhoff, S., Delfs, J. O., Ferguson, I. M., Ivanov, V., Kim, J., Kolditz, O., Kollet, S. J., Kumar, M., Lopez, S., Niu, J., Paniconi, C., Park, Y. J., Phanikumar, M. S., Shen, C., Sudicky, E. A., and Sulis, M.: Surface-subsurface model intercomparison: a first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 50, 1531–1549, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013725, 2014.
McGuire, K. J., Klaus, J., and Jackson, C. R.: Interflow, subsurface stormflow and throughflow: a synthesis of field work and modelling, Hydrol. Process., 38, e15263, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15263, 2024.
Nan, Y., Chen, C., Zhao, Y., Tian, F., and Mcdonnell, J.: A historical overview of experimental hydrology in China, Hydrol. Process., 38, e15233, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15233, 2024.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
National Geomatics Center of China (NGCC): GlobeLand30–30 m resolution global land cover dataset, National Catalogue Service For Geographic Information [data set],
https://www.webmap.cn/commres.do?method=globeIndex (last access: 9 August 2025), 2020.
National Meteorological Information Centre (NMIC): Daily surface climatological data for China (V3.0), China Meteorological Data Service Centre [data set],
http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_DAY_V3.0.html (last access: 13 February 2022), 2012.
Nippgen, F., Mcglynn, B. L., and Emanuel, R. E.: The spatial and temporal evolution of contributing areas, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4550–4573, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016719, 2015.
O'Callaghan, J. F. and Mark, D. M.: The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data, Comput Vision Graph., 28, 323–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0, 1984.
Ouyang, W., Ye, L., Chai, Y., Ma, H., Chu, J., Peng, Y., and Zhang, C.: A differentiable, physics-based hydrological model and its evaluation for data-limited basins, J. Hydrol., 649, 132471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132471, 2025.
Overton, D. E. and Brakensiek, D. L.: A kinematic model of surface runoff response, in: Proceedings of the Wellington Symposium, Wellington, New Zealand, 1–8 December 1970, 100–112,
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000012503 (last access: 11 August 2025), 1970.
Panday, S. and Huyakorn, P. S.: A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow, Adv. Water Resour., 27, 361–382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.02.016, 2004.
Paniconi, C. and Putti, M.: Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: survey and outlook, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7090–7129, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017780, 2015.
Perrini, P., Cea, L., Chiaravalloti, F., Gabriele, S., Manfreda, S., Fiorentino, M., Gioia, A., and Iacobellis, V.: A runoff-on-grid approach to embed hydrological processes in shallow water models, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR036421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036421, 2024.
Qu, Y. and Duffy, C. J.: A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation, Water Resour. Res., 43, W08419, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005752, 2007.
Reggiani, P., Sivapalan, M., and Majid Hassanizadeh, S.: A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 367–398, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00012-8, 1998.
Santos, L., Thirel, G., and Perrin, C.: Continuous state-space representation of a bucket-type rainfall-runoff model: a case study with the GR4 model using state-space GR4 (version 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1591–1605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1591-2018, 2018.
Schoups, G., Vrugt, J. A., Fenicia, F., and van de Giesen, N. C.: Corruption of accuracy and efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by inaccurate numerical implementation of conceptual hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10530, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008648, 2010.
Seibert, J. and Bergström, S.: A retrospective on hydrological catchment modelling based on half a century with the HBV model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1371–1388, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1371-2022, 2022.
Shaw, J., Kesserwani, G., Neal, J., Bates, P., and Sharifian, M. K.: LISFLOOD-FP 8.0: the new discontinuous Galerkin shallow-water solver for multi-core CPUs and GPUs, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3577–3602, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3577-2021, 2021.
Shen, C. and Phanikumar, M. S.: A process-based, distributed hydrologic model based on a large-scale method for surface–subsurface coupling, Adv. Water Resour., 33, 1524–1541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.09.002, 2010.
Shu, L., Ullrich, P. A., and Duffy, C. J.: Simulator for Hydrologic Unstructured Domains (SHUD v1.0): numerical modeling of watershed hydrology with the finite volume method, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2743–2762, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2743-2020, 2020.
Shu, L., Ullrich, P., Meng, X., Duffy, C., Chen, H., and Li, Z.: rSHUD v2.0: advancing the Simulator for Hydrologic Unstructured Domains and unstructured hydrological modeling in the R environment, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 497–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, 2024.
Song, Y., Knoben, W. J. M., Clark, M. P., Feng, D., Lawson, K., Sawadekar, K., and Shen, C.: When ancient numerical demons meet physics-informed machine learning: adjoint-based gradients for implicit differentiable modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3051–3077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, 2024.
Stacke, T. and Hagemann, S.: HydroPy (v1.0): a new global hydrology model written in Python, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7795–7816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021, 2021.
Su, B., Kazama, S., Lu, M., and Sawamoto, M.: Development of a distributed hydrological model and its application to soil erosion simulation in a forested catchment during storm period, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2811–2823, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1435, 2003.
Taheri, M., Ranjram, M., and Craig, J. R.: An upscaled model of fill-and-spill hydrological response, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR033494, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033494, 2023.
Todini, E.: A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1645–1659, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1645-2007, 2007.
Tong, B.: Fine-scale rainfall-runoff processes simulation using grid Xinanjiang (grid-XAJ) modell, PhD thesis, Hohai University, LW223611, Hohai University Library, Nanjing, 153 pp.,
https://thesis.chaoxing.com/back/thesis/downLoadFile?thesisId=196936&fid=24578&sign=790ad94f-3e9a-4255-a4ef-0a7ec7259dd1&type=1&thesisId=196936 (last access: 11 August 2025), 2022.
Tran, Q. Q., De Niel, J., and Willems, P.: Spatially distributed conceptual hydrological model building: a generic top-down approach starting from lumped models, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8064–8085, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023566, 2018.
Ul Hassan, Z., Jefferson, A. J., Avellaneda, P. M., and Bhaskar, A. S.: Assessment of hydrological parameter uncertainty versus climate projection spread on urban streamflow and floods, J. Hydrol., 638, 131546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131546, 2024.
Wang, J., Lu, Z., Han, D. W., Liu, Y., and Rico Ramirez, M. A.: Hydrological model adaptability to rainfall inputs of varied quality, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR032484, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032484, 2023.
Woldegiorgis, B. T., Baulch, H., Wheater, H., Crossman, J., Clark, M., Stadnyk, T., and Bajracharya, A.: Impacts of uncontrolled operator splitting methods on parameter identification, prediction uncertainty, and subsurface flux representation in conceptual hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR033250, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033250, 2023.
Wu, N., Zhang, K., Naghibi, A., Hashemi, H., Ning, Z., Zhang, Q., Yi, X., Wang, H., Liu, W., Gao, W., and Jarsjö, J.: Comparative Hydrological Modeling of Snow-Cover and Frozen Ground Impacts Under Topographically Complex Conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-324, in review, 2024.
Yao, C., Li, Z., Bao, H., and Yu, Z.: Application of a developed Grid-Xinanjiang model to Chinese watersheds for flood forecasting purpose, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14, 923–934, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000067, 2009.
Yao, C., Li, Z., Yu, Z., and Zhang, K.: A priori parameter estimates for a distributed, grid-based Xinanjiang model using geographically based information, J. Hydrol., 468–469, 47–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.025, 2012.
Zhang, Q., Zhang, K., Chao, L., Chen, X., and Wu, N.: A unified runoff generation scheme for applicability across different hydrometeorological zones, Environ. Modell. Softw., 180, 106138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106138, 2024.
Zhao, J.: Code for TDD-XAJ, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14227068, 2024a.
Zhao, J.: Data for TDD-XAJ, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14226969, 2024b.
Zhao, J., Duan, Y., Hu, Y., Li, B., and Liang, Z.: The numerical error of the Xinanjiang model, J. Hydrol., 619, 129324, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129324, 2023.
Zhao, R.: The Xinanjiang model applied in China, J. Hydrol., 135, 371–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90096-E, 1992.
Zhao, R. and Zhuang, Y.: Regional patterns of rainfall-runoff relationship, Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), S2, 53–68, 1963.
Zhao, R., Zhuang, Y., Fang, L., Liu, X., and Zhang, Q.: The Xinanjiang model, in: Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium, Oxford, England, 15–18 April 1980, 351–356,
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000043527 (last access: 11 August 2025), 1980.
Zhu, D., Ren, Q., Xuan, Y., Chen, Y., and Cluckie, I. D.: An effective depression filling algorithm for DEM-based 2-D surface flow modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 495–505, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-495-2013, 2013.
