Articles | Volume 28, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4903-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4903-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
18 Nov 2024
Research article |
| 18 Nov 2024
| 18 Nov 2024
Downscaling precipitation over High-mountain Asia using multi-fidelity Gaussian processes: improved estimates from ERA5
British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Andrew Orr
British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
Javier Hernandez-González
Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK
Scott Hosking
British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
Richard E. Turner
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Publisher's note: the paper was adjusted on 23 April 2025. The adjustments included the typo "chloropeth", the incorrect formatting of the matrix K, the text of the caption of table C2, as well as incorrect years given in the captions of tables 4, C1, and C2.
Related authors
No articles found.
Ella Gilbert, José Abraham Torres-Alavez, Marte G. Hofsteenge, Willem Jan van de Berg, Fredrik Boberg, Ole Bøssing Christensen, Christiaan Timo van Dalum, Xavier Fettweis, Siddharth Gumber, Nicolaj Hansen, Christoph Kittel, Clara Lambin, Damien Maure, Ruth Mottram, Martin Olesen, Andrew Orr, Tony Phillips, Maurice van Tiggelen, Kristiina Verro, and Priscilla A. Mooney
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4214, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4214, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present a new dataset – the PolarRES ensemble – of four state-of-the-art regional climate models, which capture the full complexity of Antarctica's climate. The ensemble out-performs other available tools, advancing our ability to explore Antarctic climate. While it still has limitations, the PolarRES ensemble offers a novel and exciting way of evaluating climate processes and features, and we encourage researchers to use the data, which are freely available.
Robin S. Smith, Tarkan A. Bilge, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Paul R. Holland, Till Kuhlbrodt, Charlotte Lang, Spencer Liddicoat, Tom Mitcham, Jane Mulcahy, Kaitlin A. Naughten, Andrew Orr, Julien Palmieri, Antony J. Payne, Steven Rumbold, Marc Stringer, Ranjini Swaminathan, Sarah Taylor, Jeremy Walton, and Colin Jones
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4476, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4476, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Short summary
There is a dangerous amount of uncertainty in our predictions of climate change in polar regions because some of feedbacks that might lead to changes that are too rapid for us to adapt to, or that cannot be reversed. We have run a set of simulations with a state-of-the-art Earth System Model that helps improve our understanding of how climate in these regions might change. Some of the aspects we investigate are reversible but many are not, especially those affecting ice sheets and sea level.
Sai Prabala Swetha Chittella, Andrew Orr, Pranab Deb, and Quentin Dalaiden
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4292, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4292, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation plays a vital role in regulating Antarctica's ice sheet mass balance and ice shelf stability, with much of it coming from extreme events that also drive variability. We examined trends in precipitation and extremes using advanced methods and found that the increases are primarily driven by human influence, with greenhouse gases identified as the dominant factor.
Hamish D. Pritchard, Edward C. King, David J. Goodger, Douglas Boyle, Daniel N. Goldberg, Beatriz Recinos, Andrew Orr, and Dhananjay Regmi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-519, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-519, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new and uniquely extensive dataset of glacier thickness from the Khumbu Himal around Mount Everest that stretches for 119 km, doubling the extent of thickness measurements in High Mountain Asia. Such measurements are key inputs for models that estimate how much ice is stored on the whole mountain range scale and for models that predict how this ice reserve will change in future, and what impact this will have on water supply for the large populations living downstream.
Marc Girona-Mata, Andrew Orr, Martin Widmann, Daniel Bannister, Ghulam Hussain Dars, Scott Hosking, Jesse Norris, David Ocio, Tony Phillips, Jakob Steiner, and Richard E. Turner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3073–3100, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3073-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3073-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a novel method for improving daily precipitation maps in mountain regions and pilot it across three basins in the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH). The approach leverages climate model and weather station data, along with statistical or machine learning techniques. Our results show that this approach outperforms traditional methods, especially in remote ungauged areas, suggesting that it could be used to improve precipitation maps across much of the HKH, as well as other mountain regions.
Ella Gilbert, Denis Pishniak, José Abraham Torres, Andrew Orr, Michelle Maclennan, Nander Wever, and Kristiina Verro
The Cryosphere, 19, 597–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-597-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use three sophisticated climate models to examine extreme precipitation in a critical region of West Antarctica. We found that rainfall probably occurred during the two cases we examined and that it was generated by the interaction of air with steep topography. Our results show that kilometre-scale models are useful tools for exploring extreme precipitation in this region and that more observations of rainfall are needed.
Xavier J. Levine, Ryan S. Williams, Gareth Marshall, Andrew Orr, Lise Seland Graff, Dörthe Handorf, Alexey Karpechko, Raphael Köhler, René R. Wijngaard, Nadine Johnston, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, and Priscilla A. Mooney
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1161–1177, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
While the most recent climate projections agree that the Arctic is warming, differences remain in how much and in other climate variables such as precipitation. This presents a challenge for stakeholders who need to develop mitigation and adaptation strategies. We tackle this problem by using the storyline approach to generate four plausible and actionable realisations of end-of-century climate change for the Arctic, spanning its most likely range of variability.
Nicolaj Hansen, Andrew Orr, Xun Zou, Fredrik Boberg, Thomas J. Bracegirdle, Ella Gilbert, Peter L. Langen, Matthew A. Lazzara, Ruth Mottram, Tony Phillips, Ruth Price, Sebastian B. Simonsen, and Stuart Webster
The Cryosphere, 18, 2897–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated a melt event over the Ross Ice Shelf. We use regional climate models and a firn model to simulate the melt and compare the results with satellite data. We find that the firn model aligned well with observed melt days in certain parts of the ice shelf. The firn model had challenges accurately simulating the melt extent in the western sector. We identified potential reasons for these discrepancies, pointing to limitations in the models related to representing the cloud properties.
Raghul Parthipan, Hannah M. Christensen, J. Scott Hosking, and Damon J. Wischik
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4501–4519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4501-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4501-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
How can we create better climate models? We tackle this by proposing a data-driven successor to the existing approach for capturing key temporal trends in climate models. We combine probability, allowing us to represent uncertainty, with machine learning, a technique to learn relationships from data which are undiscoverable to humans. Our model is often superior to existing baselines when tested in a simple atmospheric simulation.
Jeremy Carter, Amber Leeson, Andrew Orr, Christoph Kittel, and J. Melchior van Wessem
The Cryosphere, 16, 3815–3841, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3815-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models provide valuable information for studying processes such as the collapse of ice shelves over Antarctica which impact estimates of sea level rise. This paper examines variability across climate simulations over Antarctica for fields including snowfall, temperature and melt. Significant systematic differences between outputs are found, occurring at both large and fine spatial scales across Antarctica. Results are important for future impact assessments and model development.
Nicolaj Hansen, Sebastian B. Simonsen, Fredrik Boberg, Christoph Kittel, Andrew Orr, Niels Souverijns, J. Melchior van Wessem, and Ruth Mottram
The Cryosphere, 16, 711–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-711-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-711-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the impact of different ice masks when modelling surface mass balance over Antarctica. We used ice masks and data from five of the most used regional climate models and a common mask. We see large disagreement between the ice masks, which has a large impact on the surface mass balance, especially around the Antarctic Peninsula and some of the largest glaciers. We suggest a solution for creating a new, up-to-date, high-resolution ice mask that can be used in Antarctic modelling.
Anna Vaughan, Will Tebbutt, J. Scott Hosking, and Richard E. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 251–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-251-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-251-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new method for climate downscaling, i.e. transforming low-resolution climate model output to high-resolution projections, using a deep-learning model known as a convolutional conditional neural process. This model is shown to outperform an ensemble of baseline methods for downscaling daily maximum temperature and precipitation and provides a powerful new downscaling framework for climate impact studies.
Ruth Mottram, Nicolaj Hansen, Christoph Kittel, J. Melchior van Wessem, Cécile Agosta, Charles Amory, Fredrik Boberg, Willem Jan van de Berg, Xavier Fettweis, Alexandra Gossart, Nicole P. M. van Lipzig, Erik van Meijgaard, Andrew Orr, Tony Phillips, Stuart Webster, Sebastian B. Simonsen, and Niels Souverijns
The Cryosphere, 15, 3751–3784, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3751-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3751-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compare the calculated surface mass budget (SMB) of Antarctica in five different regional climate models. On average ~ 2000 Gt of snow accumulates annually, but different models vary by ~ 10 %, a difference equivalent to ± 0.5 mm of global sea level rise. All models reproduce observed weather, but there are large differences in regional patterns of snowfall, especially in areas with very few observations, giving greater uncertainty in Antarctic mass budget than previously identified.
Andrew Orr, Hua Lu, Patrick Martineau, Edwin P. Gerber, Gareth J. Marshall, and Thomas J. Bracegirdle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7451–7472, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7451-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7451-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Reanalysis datasets combine observations and weather forecast simulations to create our best estimate of the state of the atmosphere and are important for climate monitoring. Differences in the technical details of these products mean that they may give different results. This study therefore examined how changes associated with the so-called Antarctic ozone hole are represented, which is one of the most important climate changes in recent decades, and showed that they were broadly consistent.
Andrew Orr, J. Scott Hosking, Aymeric Delon, Lars Hoffmann, Reinhold Spang, Tracy Moffat-Griffin, James Keeble, Nathan Luke Abraham, and Peter Braesicke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12483–12497, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12483-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12483-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are clouds found in the Antarctic winter stratosphere and are implicated in the formation of the ozone hole. These clouds can sometimes be formed or enhanced by mountain waves, formed as air passes over hills or mountains. However, this important mechanism is missing in coarse-resolution climate models, limiting our ability to simulate ozone. This study examines an attempt to include the effects of mountain waves and their impact on PSCs and ozone.
Cited articles
Andermann, C., Bonnet, S., and Gloaguen, R.: Evaluation of precipitation data sets along the Himalayan front, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q07023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003513, 2011. a, b, c
Anders, A. M., Roe, G. H., Hallet, B., Montgomery, D. R., Finnegan, N. J., and Putkonen, J.: Spatial patterns of precipitation and topography in the Himalaya, Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, 398, 39–53, 2006. a
Andersson, T. R., Bruinsma, W. P., Markou, S., Requeima, J., Coca-Castro, A., Vaughan, A., Ellis, A.-L., Lazzara, M. A., Jones, D., Hosking, S., and Turner, R. E.: Environmental sensor placement with convolutional Gaussian neural processes, Environmental Data Science, 2, e32, https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2023.22, 2023. a, b
Bannister, D., Orr, A., Jain, S. K., Holman, I. P., Momblanch, A., Phillips, T., Adeloye, A. J., Snapir, B., Waine, T. W., Hosking, J. S., and Allen-Sader, C.: Bias correction of high-resolution regional climate model precipitation output gives the best estimates of precipitation in Himalayan catchments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 14220–14239, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030804, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Baño-Medina, J., Manzanas, R., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2109–2124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020, 2020. a
Bhardwaj, A., Ziegler, A. D., Wasson, R. J., and Chow, W. T.: Accuracy of rainfall estimates at high altitude in the Garhwal Himalaya (India): A comparison of secondary precipitation products and station rainfall measurements, Atmos. Res., 188, 30–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.01.005, 2017. a, b, c
Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Topography, relief, and TRMM-derived rainfall variations along the Himalaya, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026037, 2006. a
Bookhagen, B. and Burbank, D. W.: Toward a complete Himalayan hydrological budget: Spatiotemporal distribution of snowmelt and rainfall and their impact on river discharge, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 115, F03019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001426, 2010. a, b
Bui, T. D., Nguyen, C., and Turner, R. E.: Streaming sparse Gaussian process approximations, Adv. Neur. In., 30, 14220—4239, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.21293, 2017. a
Cannon, F., Carvalho, L. M., Jones, C., Hoell, A., Norris, J., Kiladis, G. N., and Tahir, A. A.: The influence of tropical forcing on extreme winter precipitation in the western Himalaya, Clim. Dynam., 48, 1213–1232, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3137-0, 2017. a
Chen, Y., Sharma, S., Zhou, X., Yang, K., Li, X., Niu, X., Hu, X., and Khadka, N.: Spatial performance of multiple reanalysis precipitation datasets on the southern slope of central Himalaya, Atmos. Res., 250, 105365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105365, 2021. a, b
Collier, E. and Immerzeel, W. W.: High-resolution modeling of atmospheric dynamics in the Nepalese Himalaya, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9882–9896, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023266, 2015. a
Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7, 2024. a
Cutajar, K., Pullin, M., Damianou, A., Lawrence, N., and González, J.: Deep gaussian processes for multi-fidelity modeling, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.07320, 2019. a
Dahri, Z. H., Ludwig, F., Moors, E., Ahmad, B., Khan, A., and Kabat, P.: An appraisal of precipitation distribution in the high-altitude catchments of the Indus basin, Sci. Total Environ., 548, 289–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.001, 2016. a, b, c, d
Dahri, Z. H., Ludwig, F., Moors, E., Ahmad, S., Ahmad, B., Ahmad, S., Riaz, M., and Kabat, P.: Climate change and hydrological regime of the high-altitude Indus basin under extreme climate scenarios, Sci. Total Environ., 768, 144467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144467, 2021a. a
Dahri, Z. H., Ludwig, F., Moors, E., Ahmad, S., Ahmad, B., Shoaib, M., Ali, I., Iqbal, M. S., Pomee, M. S., Mangrio, A. G., Ahmad, M. M., and Kabat, P.: Spatio-temporal evaluation of gridded precipitation products for the high-altitude Indus basin, Int. J. Climatol., 41, 4283–4306, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7073, 2021b. a
Danielson, J. J. and Gesch, D. B.: Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010), US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey [data set], https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073, 2011. a, b, c
Daulton, S., Balandat, M., and Bakshy, E.: Differentiable expected hypervolume improvement for parallel multi-objective Bayesian optimization, Adv. Neur. In., 33, 9851–9864, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.05078, 2020. a
Daulton, S., Balandat, M., and Bakshy, E.: Parallel bayesian optimization of multiple noisy objectives with expected hypervolume improvement, Adv. Neur. In., 34, 2187–2200, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.08195, 2021. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a
Dimri, A.: Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins, J. Water Clim. Change, 12, 1297–1309, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.119, 2021. a
Dimri, A., Niyogi, D., Barros, A., Ridley, J., Mohanty, U., Yasunari, T., and Sikka, D.: Western disturbances: a review, Rev. Geophys., 53, 225–246, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000460, 2015. a
Drucker, H., Burges, C. J., Kaufman, L., Smola, A., and Vapnik, V.: Support vector regression machines, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2–5 December 1996, Denver, CO, USA, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/1996/file/d38901788c533e8286cb6400b40b386d-Paper.pdf (last access: 11 November 2024), 1996. a
Duan, K., Xu, B., and Wu, G.: Snow accumulation variability at altitude of 7010 m a.s.l. in Muztag Ata Mountain in Pamir Plateau during 1958–2002, J. Hydrol., 531, 912–918, 2015. a
Duvenaud, D., Lloyd, J., Grosse, R., Tenenbaum, J., and Zoubin, G.: Structure discovery in nonparametric regression through compositional kernel search, in: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, 17–19 June 2013, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1166–1174, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.4922, 2013. a
Gerlitz, L., Conrad, O., and Böhner, J.: Large-scale atmospheric forcing and topographic modification of precipitation rates over High Asia – a neural-network-based approach, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 61–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-61-2015, 2015. a
Gordon, J., Bruinsma, W. P., Foong, A. Y., Requeima, J., Dubois, Y., and Turner, R. E.: Convolutional conditional neural processes, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.13556, 2019. a
Gutiérrez, J. M., Maraun, D., Widmann, M., Huth, R., Hertig, E., Benestad, R., Rössler, O., Wibig, J., Wilcke, R., Kotlarski, S., San Martín, D., Herrera, S., Bedia, J., Casanueva, A., Manzanas, R., Iturbide, M., Vrac, M., Dubrovsky, M., Ribalaygua, J., Pórtoles, J., Räty, O., Räisänen, J., Hingray, B., Raynaud, D., Casado, M. J., Ramos, P., Zerenner, T., Turco, M., Bosshard, T., Štěpánek, P., Bartholy, J., Pongracz, R., Keller, D. E., Fischer, A. M., Cardoso, R. M.,Soares, P. M. M., Czernecki, B., and Pagé, C.: An intercomparison of a large ensemble of statistical downscaling methods over Europe: Results from the VALUE perfect predictor cross-validation experiment, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3750–3785, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5462, 2019. a
Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., and Lister, D.: Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset, Scientific Data, 7, 109, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3, 2020. a
Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1095–1108, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1, 2009. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, Co., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a, b
Ho, T. K.: Random decision forests, in: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 1, IEEE, 14–16 August 1995, Montreal, QC, Canada, 278–282, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994, 1995. a
Hussain, S., Song, X., Ren, G., Hussain, I., Han, D., and Zaman, M.: Evaluation of gridded precipitation data in the Hindu Kush–Karakoram–Himalaya mountainous area, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 62, 2393–2405, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1384548, 2017. a, b
Immerzeel, W. W., Wanders, N., Lutz, A. F., Shea, J. M., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Reconciling high-altitude precipitation in the upper Indus basin with glacier mass balances and runoff, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4673–4687, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4673-2015, 2015. a, b
Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch, T., Hyde, S., Brumby, S., Davies, B., Elmore, A. C., Emmer, A., Feng, M., A Fernández, A., Haritashya, U. K., Kargel, J. S., Koppes, M. N., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Kulkarni, A. V., Mayewski, P. A., Nepal, S., Pacheco, P., Painter, T. H., Pellicciotti, F., Rajaram, H., Rupper, S. B., Sinisalo, A., Shrestha, A. B., Viviroli, D., Wada, Y., Xiao, C., Yao, T.-D., and Baillie, J. E. M.: Importance and vulnerability of the world's water towers, Nature, 577, 364–369, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y, 2020. a, b
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency: GPM Data Utilization Handbook, Tech. rep., Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/TRMM/documents/PR_algorithm_product_information/doc_pr_v8/GPM_data_util_handbook_V6_20181004_E.pdf, (last access: 27 August 2021), 2018. a
Ji, X., Li, Y., Luo, X., He, D., Guo, R., Wang, J., Bai, Y., Yue, C., and Liu, C.: Evaluation of bias correction methods for APHRODITE data to improve hydrologic simulation in a large Himalayan basin, Atmos. Res., 242, 104964, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104964, 2020. a, b, c
Karki, R., ul Hasson, S., Gerlitz, L., Schickhoff, U., Scholten, T., and Böhner, J.: Quantifying the added value of convection-permitting climate simulations in complex terrain: a systematic evaluation of WRF over the Himalayas, Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 507–528, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-507-2017, 2017. a
King, A. D., Alexander, L. V., and Donat, M. G.: The efficacy of using gridded data to examine extreme rainfall characteristics: a case study for Australia, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 2376–2387, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3588, 2013. a
Krishnan, R., Shrestha, A. B., Ren, G., Rajbhandari, R., Saeed, S., Sanjay, J., Syed, M. A., Vellore, R., Xu, Y., You, Q., and Ren, Y.: Unravelling climate change in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: rapid warming in the mountains and increasing extremes, The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: Mountains, climate change, sustainability and people, Springer, 57–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_3, 2019. a
Kumar, M., Hodnebrog, Ø., Daloz, A. S., Sen, S., Badiger, S., and Krishnaswamy, J.: Measuring precipitation in Eastern Himalaya: Ground validation of eleven satellite, model and gauge interpolated gridded products, J. Hydrol., 599, 126252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126252, 2021. a, b
Lalchand, V., Tazi, K., Cheema, T. M., Turner, R. E., and Hosking, S.: Kernel Learning for Explainable Climate Science, in: 16th Bayesian Modelling Applications Workshop at UAI, 5 August 2022, Eidhoven, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.04947, 2022. a
Leander, R. and Buishand, T. A.: Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows, J. Hydrol., 332, 487–496, 2007. a
Lederer, A., Conejo, A. J. O., Maier, K. A., Xiao, W., Umlauft, J., and Hirche, S.: Gaussian process-based real-time learning for safety critical applications, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 18–24 July 2021, online, 6055–6064, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.09446, 2021. a
Le Gratiet, L. and Garnier, J.: Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity, Int. J. Uncertain. Quan., 4, 365–386, https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2014006914, 2014. a
Li, L., Gochis, D. J., Sobolowski, S., and Mesquita, M. D.: Evaluating the present annual water budget of a Himalayan headwater river basin using a high-resolution atmosphere-hydrology model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4786–4807, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026279, 2017. a
Libertino, A., Allamano, P., Laio, F., and Claps, P.: Regional-scale analysis of extreme precipitation from short and fragmented records, Adv. Water Resour., 112, 147–159, https://doi.org/0.1016/j.advwatres.2017.12.015, 2018. a
Liu, H., Ong, Y.-S., Shen, X., and Cai, J.: When Gaussian process meets big data: A review of scalable GPs, IEEE T. Neur. Net. Lear., 31, 4405–4423, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2957109, 2020. a
Lund, J., Forster, R. R., Rupper, S. B., Deeb, E. J., Marshall, H., Hashmi, M. Z., and Burgess, E.: Mapping snowmelt progression in the Upper Indus Basin with synthetic aperture radar, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 318, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00318, 2020. a
Lyu, Y. and Yong, B.: A novel double machine learning strategy for producing high-precision multi-source merging precipitation estimates over the Tibetan Plateau, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR035643, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035643, 2024. a
MacKay, D. J. C.: Bayesian non-linear modelling for the prediction competition, ASHRAE Tran., 100, 1053–1062, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8729-7_18, 1994. a
Maraun, D. and Widmann, M.: Statistical downscaling and bias correction for climate research, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107588783, 2017. a
Maussion, F., Scherer, D., Mölg, T., Collier, E., Curio, J., and Finkelnburg, R.: Precipitation seasonality and variability over the Tibetan Plateau as resolved by the High Asia Reanalysis, J. Climate, 27, 1910–1927, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00282.1, 2014. a, b
Mei, Y., Maggioni, V., Houser, P., Xue, Y., and Rouf, T.: A nonparametric statistical technique for spatial downscaling of precipitation over High Mountain Asia, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027472, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027472, 2020. a, b
Meng, J., Li, L., Hao, Z., Wang, J., and Shao, Q.: Suitability of TRMM satellite rainfall in driving a distributed hydrological model in the source region of Yellow River, J. Hydrol., 509, 320–332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.049, 2014. a, b
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021. a
Ning, C., Wang, Y., Nan, Z., Chen, H., and Liu, C.: Study on correction of daily precipitation data of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau with machine learning models, in: 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), IEEE, 10–15 July 2016, Beijing, China, 517–520, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729128, 2016. a, b
Norris, J., Carvalho, L. M., Jones, C., Cannon, F., Bookhagen, B., Palazzi, E., and Tahir, A. A.: The spatiotemporal variability of precipitation over the Himalaya: evaluation of one-year WRF model simulation, Clim. Dynam., 49, 2179–2204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3414-y, 2017. a, b
Norris, J., Carvalho, L. M., Jones, C., and Cannon, F.: Deciphering the contrasting climatic trends between the central Himalaya and Karakoram with 36 years of WRF simulations, Clim. Dynam., 52, 159–180, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4133-3, 2019. a, b
Norris, J., Carvalho, L. M., Jones, C., and Cannon, F.: Warming and drying over the central Himalaya caused by an amplification of local mountain circulation, Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 3, 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0105-5, 2020. a
Orr, A., Listowski, C., Couttet, M., Collier, E., Immerzeel, W., Deb, P., and Bannister, D.: Sensitivity of simulated summer monsoonal precipitation in Langtang Valley, Himalaya, to cloud microphysics schemes in WRF, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 6298–6318, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025801, 2017. a, b, c
Orr, A., Ahmad, B., Alam, U., Appadurai, A., Bharucha, Z. P., Biemans, H., Bolch, T., Chaulagain, N. P., Dhaubanjar, S., Dimri, A., P., Dixon, H., Fowler, H. J., Gioli, G., Halvorson, S. J., Hussain, A., Jeelani, G., Kamal, S., Khalid, I. S., Liu, S., Lutz, A., Mehra, M. K., Miles, E., Momblanch, A., Muccione, V., Mukherji, A., Mustafa, D., Najmuddin, O., Nasimi, M. N., Nüsser, M., Pandey, V. P., Parveen, S., Pellicciotti, F., Pollino, C., Potter, E., Qazizada, M. R., Ray, S., Romshoo, S., Sarkar, S. K., Sawas, A., Sen, S., Shah, A., Shah, M. A. A., Shea, J. M., Sheikh, A. T., Shrestha, A. B., Tayal, S., Tigala, S., Virk, Z. T., Wester, Ph., and Wescoat Jr., J. L.: Knowledge priorities on climate change and water in the Upper Indus Basin: A horizon scanning exercise to identify the top 100 research questions in social and natural sciences, Earths Future, 10, e2021EF002619, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002619, 2022. a, b
Palazzi, E., Von Hardenberg, J., and Provenzale, A.: Precipitation in the Hindu-Kush Karakoram Himalaya: observations and future scenarios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 85–100, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018697, 2013. a, b, c
Panday, P. K., Thibeault, J., and Frey, K. E.: Changing temperature and precipitation extremes in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region: An analysis of CMIP3 and CMIP5 simulations and projections, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 3058–3077, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4192, 2015. a
Perdikaris, P., Raissi, M., Damianou, A., Lawrence, N. D., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 473, 20160751, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0751, 2017. a
Potter, E., Fyffe, C., Orr, A., Quincey, D., Ross, A. N., Rangecroft, S., Medina, K., Burns, H., Llacza, A., Jacome, G., Hellström, R., Castro, J., Hosking, J. S., Cochachin, A., Klein, C., Loarte, E., and Pellicciotti, F.: Projected increases in climate extremes and temperature-induced drought over the Peruvian Andes, 1980–2100, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-9576, hhttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-9576, 2022. a
Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K.: Gaussian processes for machine learning, vol. 1, MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001, 2006. a, b, c, d
Remesan, R. and Holman, I. P.: Effect of baseline meteorological data selection on hydrological modelling of climate change scenarios, J. Hydrol., 528, 631–642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.026, 2015. a
Salzmann, N., Huggel, C., Rohrer, M., and Stoffel, M.: Data and knowledge gaps in glacier, snow and related runoff research – A climate change adaptation perspective, J. Hydrol., 518, 225–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.058, 2014. a
Sanjay, J., Krishnan, R., Shrestha, A. B., Rajbhandari, R., and Ren, G.-Y.: Downscaled climate change projections for the Hindu Kush Himalayan region using CORDEX South Asia regional climate models, Advances in Climate Change Research, 8, 185–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.08.003, 2017. a, b
Schreiner-McGraw, A. P. and Ajami, H.: Combined impacts of uncertainty in precipitation and air temperature on simulated mountain system recharge from an integrated hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1145–1164, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1145-2022, 2022. a
Shukla, A. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Singh, R. P., Pal, L., and Fu, D.: Evaluation of TRMM precipitation dataset over Himalayan catchment: the upper Ganga basin, India, Water, 11, 613, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030613, 2019. a, b
Sigdel, M. and Ma, Y.: Variability and trends in daily precipitation extremes on the northern and southern slopes of the central Himalaya, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 130, 571–581, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1916-5, 2017. a
Singh, D., Sharma, V., and Juyal, V.: Observed linear trend in few surface weather elements over the Northwest Himalayas (NWH) during winter season, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 124, 553–565, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0560-2, 2015. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR technical note 475, NCAR, Boulder, CO, USA, 113 pp. https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH, 2008. a
Sun, H., Yao, T., Su, F., He, Z., Tang, G., Li, N., Zheng, B., Huang, J., Meng, F., Ou, T., and Chen, D.: Corrected ERA5 precipitation by machine learning significantly improved flow simulations for the third pole basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 23, 1663–1679, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-22-0015.1, 2022. a, b, c
Tazi, K.: Downscaled ERA5 monthly precipitation data using Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Processes between 1980 and 2012 for the Upper Beas and Sutlej Basins, Himalayas, NERC EDS UK Polar Data Centre [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/b2099787-b57c-44ae-bf42-0d46d9ec87cc, 2023. a, b
Tazi, K.: Code for `Downscaling precipitation over High-mountain Asia using multi-fidelity Gaussian processes: improved estimates from ERA5', Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14106487, 2024. a
Tazi, K., Lin, J. A., Viljoen, R., Gardner, A., John, S., Ge, H., and Turner, R. E.: Beyond Intuition, a Framework for Applying GPs to Real-World Data, in: ICML Workshop on Structured Probabilistic Inference and Generative Modeling, 22 July 2023, Honolulu, HI, USA, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03093, 2023. a, b
Titsias, M.: Variational learning of inducing variables in sparse Gaussian processes, in: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 16–18 April 2009, PMLR, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA, 567–574, http://proceedings.mlr.press/v5/titsias09a/titsias09a.pdf (last access: 11 November 2024), 2009. a
Tresp, V.: A Bayesian committee machine, Neural Comput., 12, 2719–2741, https://doi.org/10.1162/089976600300014908, 2000. a
VALUE: VALUE ECA&D local observations, VALUE [data set], http://www.value-cost.eu/data (last access: 13 November 2024), 2024. a
Vaughan, A., Tebbutt, W., Hosking, J. S., and Turner, R. E.: Convolutional conditional neural processes for local climate downscaling, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 251–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-251-2022, 2022. a, b
Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A., and Shrestha, A. B.: The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: mountains, climate change, sustainability and people, Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1, 2019. a
Wilson, A. and Nickisch, H.: Kernel interpolation for scalable structured Gaussian processes (KISS-GP), in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 7–9 July 2015, Lille, France, 1775–1784, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.01057, 2015. a
Winiger, M., Gumpert, M., and Yamout, H.: Karakorum–Hindukush–western Himalaya: assessing high-altitude water resources, Hydrol. Process., 19, 2329–2338, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5887, 2005. a
Wulf, H., Bookhagen, B., and Scherler, D.: Differentiating between rain, snow, and glacier contributions to river discharge in the western Himalaya using remote-sensing data and distributed hydrological modeling, Adv. Water Resour., 88, 152–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.12.004, 2016. a, b, c
Xiang, Y., Zeng, C., Zhang, F., and Wang, L.: Effects of climate change on runoff in a representative Himalayan basin assessed through optimal integration of multi-source precipitation data, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 53, 101828, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101828, 2024. a, b, c
Yadav, B. C., Thayyen, R. J., Jain, K., and Dimri, A. P.: Himalayan Re-gridded and Observational Experiment (HiROX): Part I–Development, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 133, 22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02217-8, 2024. a
Yan, Y., Wang, H., Li, G., Xia, J., Ge, F., Zeng, Q., Ren, X., and Tan, L.: Projection of future extreme precipitation in China based on the CMIP6 from a machine learning perspective, Remote Sens.-Basel, 14, 4033, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164033, 2022. a
Yatagai, A., Kamiguchi, K., Arakawa, O., Hamada, A., Yasutomi, N., and Kitoh, A.: APHRODITE: Constructing a long-term daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1401–1415, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00122.1, 2012. a, b
Yin, Z.-Y., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Colella, M., and Chen, X.: An assessment of the biases of satellite rainfall estimates over the Tibetan Plateau and correction methods based on topographic analysis, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 301–326, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM903.1, 2008. a, b, c
Zhang, L., Li, X., Zheng, D., Zhang, K., Ma, Q., Zhao, Y., and Ge, Y.: Merging multiple satellite-based precipitation products and gauge observations using a novel double machine learning approach, J. Hydrol., 594, 125969, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125969, 2021. a
Download
Please read the editorial note first before accessing the article.
- Article
(3726 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
This work aims to improve the understanding of precipitation patterns in High-mountain Asia, a crucial water source for around 1.9 billion people. Through a novel machine learning method, we generate high-resolution precipitation predictions, including the likelihoods of floods and droughts. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our method is simpler to implement and more suitable for small datasets. The method also shows accuracy comparable to or better than existing benchmark datasets.
This work aims to improve the understanding of precipitation patterns in High-mountain Asia, a...
