Articles | Volume 21, issue 8
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3953–3973, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017

Special issue: HESS Opinions 2017

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3953–3973, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017

Opinion article 01 Aug 2017

Opinion article | 01 Aug 2017

HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology

Markus Hrachowitz and Martyn P. Clark

Related authors

Reduction of vegetation-accessible water storage capacity after deforestation affects catchment travel time distributions and increases young water fractions in a headwater catchment
Markus Hrachowitz, Michael Stockinger, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Ruud van der Ent, Heye Bogena, Andreas Lücke, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4887–4915, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, 2021
Short summary
Integration of observed and model derived groundwater levels in landslide threshold models in Rwanda
Judith Uwihirwe, Markus Hrachowitz, and Thom Bogaard
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-222,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-222, 2021
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Climate-controlled root zone parameters show potential to improve water flux simulations by land surface models
Fransje van Oorschot, Ruud J. van der Ent, Markus Hrachowitz, and Andrea Alessandri
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 725–743, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-725-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Future changes in annual, seasonal and monthly runoff signatures in contrasting Alpine catchments in Austria
Sarah Hanus, Markus Hrachowitz, Harry Zekollari, Gerrit Schoups, Miren Vizcaino, and Roland Kaitna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3429–3453, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Applying Non-Parametric Bayesian Network to estimate monthly maximum river discharge: potential and challenges
Elisa Ragno, Markus Hrachowitz, and Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-229,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-229, 2021
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Effects of spatial resolution of terrain models on modelled discharge and soil loss in Oaxaca, Mexico
Sergio Naranjo, Francelino A. Rodrigues Jr., Georg Cadisch, Santiago Lopez-Ridaura, Mariela Fuentes Ponce, and Carsten Marohn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5561–5588, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5561-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5561-2021, 2021
Short summary
Benchmarking data-driven rainfall–runoff models in Great Britain: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models with four lumped conceptual models
Thomas Lees, Marcus Buechel, Bailey Anderson, Louise Slater, Steven Reece, Gemma Coxon, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5517–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, 2021
Short summary
Numerical daemons of hydrological models are summoned by extreme precipitation
Peter T. La Follette, Adriaan J. Teuling, Nans Addor, Martyn Clark, Koen Jansen, and Lieke A. Melsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5425–5446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5425-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5425-2021, 2021
Short summary
How is Baseflow Index (BFI) impacted by water resource management practices?
John P. Bloomfield, Mengyi Gong, Benjamin P. Marchant, Gemma Coxon, and Nans Addor
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5355–5379, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5355-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Technical note: RAT – a robustness assessment test for calibrated and uncalibrated hydrological models
Pierre Nicolle, Vazken Andréassian, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Charles Perrin, Guillaume Thirel, Laurent Coron, and Léonard Santos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5013–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Ajami, N. K., Gupta, H., Wagener, T., and Sorooshian, S.: Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system, J. Hydrol., 298, 112–135, 2004.
Andersen, H. and Hepburn, B.: Scientific Method, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by: Zalta, E. N., Stanford, 2016.
Andréassian, V. and Perrin, C.: On the ambiguous interpretation of the Turc-Budyko nondimensional graph, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10601, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012532, 2012.
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Berthet, L., Le Moine, N., Lerat, J., Loumagne, C., Oudin, L., Mathevet, T., Ramos, M.-H., and Valéry, A.: HESS Opinions Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1757–1764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009, 2009.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73–89, 1998.
Special issue
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Physically based and conceptual models in hydrology are the two endpoints in the spectrum of modelling strategies, mostly differing in their degree of detail in resolving the model domain. Given the limitations both modelling strategies face, we believe that to achieve progress in hydrological modelling, a convergence of these methods is necessary. This would allow us to exploit the respective advantages of the bottom-up and top-down models while limiting their respective uncertainties.