Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3109–3128, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3109-2016

Special issue: Effective Science Communication and Education in Hydrology...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3109–3128, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3109-2016
Research article
02 Aug 2016
Research article | 02 Aug 2016

Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast: a risk-based decision-making game

Louise Arnal et al.

Related authors

Canadian historical Snow Water Equivalent dataset (CanSWE, 1928–2020)
Vincent Vionnet, Colleen Mortimer, Mike Brady, Louise Arnal, and Ross Brown
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4603–4619, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, 2021
Short summary
“Are we talking just a bit of water out of bank? Or is it Armageddon?” Front line perspectives on transitioning to probabilistic fluvial flood forecasts in England
Louise Arnal, Liz Anspoks, Susan Manson, Jessica Neumann, Tim Norton, Elisabeth Stephens, Louise Wolfenden, and Hannah Louise Cloke
Geosci. Commun., 3, 203–232, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-203-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-203-2020, 2020
Short summary
Can seasonal hydrological forecasts inform local decisions and actions? A decision-making activity
Jessica L. Neumann, Louise Arnal, Rebecca E. Emerton, Helen Griffith, Stuart Hyslop, Sofia Theofanidi, and Hannah L. Cloke
Geosci. Commun., 1, 35–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-35-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-35-2018, 2018
Short summary
Developing a global operational seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasting system: GloFAS-Seasonal v1.0
Rebecca Emerton, Ervin Zsoter, Louise Arnal, Hannah L. Cloke, Davide Muraro, Christel Prudhomme, Elisabeth M. Stephens, Peter Salamon, and Florian Pappenberger
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3327–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3327-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3327-2018, 2018
Short summary
Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?
Louise Arnal, Hannah L. Cloke, Elisabeth Stephens, Fredrik Wetterhall, Christel Prudhomme, Jessica Neumann, Blazej Krzeminski, and Florian Pappenberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Quantifying the uncertainty of precipitation forecasting using probabilistic deep learning
Lei Xu, Nengcheng Chen, Chao Yang, Hongchu Yu, and Zeqiang Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2923–2938, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2923-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2923-2022, 2022
Short summary
Unraveling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate change
Thibault Lemaitre-Basset, Ludovic Oudin, Guillaume Thirel, and Lila Collet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2147–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2147-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Exploring hydrologic post-processing of ensemble streamflow forecasts based on affine kernel dressing and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II
Jing Xu, François Anctil, and Marie-Amélie Boucher
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1001–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1001-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1001-2022, 2022
Short summary
Choosing between post-processing precipitation forecasts or chaining several uncertainty quantification tools in hydrological forecasting systems
Emixi Sthefany Valdez, François Anctil, and Maria-Helena Ramos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 197–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022, 2022
Short summary
Performance of the Global Forecast System's medium-range precipitation forecasts in the Niger river basin using multiple satellite-based products
Haowen Yue, Mekonnen Gebremichael, and Vahid Nourani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 167–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-167-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-167-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Anaman, K. A., Lellyett, S. C., Drake, L., Leigh, R. J., Henderson-Sellers, A., Noar, P. F., Sullivan, P. J., and Thampapillai, D. J.: Benefits of meteorological services: evidence from recent research in Australia, Meteorol. Appl., 5, 103–115, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482798000668, 1998.
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 525, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956, 2015.
Boucher, M. A., Tremblay, D., Delorme, L., Perreault, L., and Anctil, F.: Hydro-economic assessment of hydrological forecasting systems, J. Hydrol., 416-417, 133–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.042, 2012.
Breidert, C., Hahsler, M., and Reutterer, T.: A review of methods for measuring willingness-to-pay, Innovative Marketing, 2, 8–32, 2006.
Buizza, R.: The value of probabilistic prediction, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 9, 36–42, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.170, 2008.
Download
Short summary
Forecasts are produced as probabilities of occurrence of specific events, which is both an added value and a challenge for users. This paper presents a game on flood protection, "How much are you prepared to pay for a forecast?", which investigated how users perceive the value of forecasts and are willing to pay for them when making decisions. It shows that users are mainly influenced by the perceived quality of the forecasts, their need for the information and their degree of risk tolerance.