Articles | Volume 28, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024
Research article
 | 
13 Jun 2024
Research article |  | 13 Jun 2024

Metamorphic testing of machine learning and conceptual hydrologic models

Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen

Related authors

A likelihood framework for deterministic hydrological models and the importance of non-stationary autocorrelation
Lorenz Ammann, Fabrizio Fenicia, and Peter Reichert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2147–2172, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2147-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2147-2019, 2019
Short summary
Improving uncertainty estimation in urban hydrological modeling by statistically describing bias
D. Del Giudice, M. Honti, A. Scheidegger, C. Albert, P. Reichert, and J. Rieckermann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4209–4225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4209-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4209-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1277–1294, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025, 2025
Short summary
CH-RUN: a deep-learning-based spatially contiguous runoff reconstruction for Switzerland
Basil Kraft, Michael Schirmer, William H. Aeberhard, Massimiliano Zappa, Sonia I. Seneviratne, and Lukas Gudmundsson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1061–1082, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1061-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1061-2025, 2025
Short summary
Runoff component quantification and future streamflow projection in a large mountainous basin based on a multidata-constrained cryospheric–hydrological model
Mengjiao Zhang, Yi Nan, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1033–1060, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1033-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1033-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring the potential processes controlling changes in precipitation–runoff relationships in non-stationary environments
Tian Lan, Tongfang Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jiefeng Wu, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, 2025
Short summary
A diversity-centric strategy for the selection of spatio-temporal training data for LSTM-based streamflow forecasting
Everett Snieder and Usman T. Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 785–798, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-785-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-785-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Alvarez-Garreton, C., Mendoza, P. A., Boisier, J. P., Addor, N., Galleguillos, M., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Lara, A., Puelma, C., Cortes, G., Garreaud, R., McPhee, J., and Ayala, A.: The CAMELS-CL dataset: catchment attributes and meteorology for large sample studies – Chile dataset, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5817–5846, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5817-2018, 2018. a
Bai, P., Liu, X., and Xie, J.: Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: A comparison of the long short-term memory network with two conceptual hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 592, 125779, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125779, 2021. a, b
Battjes, J. A. and Labeur, R. J.: Unsteady Flow in Open Channels, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, ISBN 978-1-107-15029-4, 2017. a, b
Bergström, S.: The HBV Model, Tech. rep., SMHI Reports Hydrology, Sweden, https://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.83589!/Menu/general/extGroup/attachmentColHold/mainCol1/file/RH_4.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 1992. a, b
Download
Short summary
We compared the predicted change in catchment outlet discharge to precipitation and temperature change for conceptual and machine learning hydrological models. We found that machine learning models, despite providing excellent fit and prediction capabilities, can be unreliable regarding the prediction of the effect of temperature change for low-elevation catchments. This indicates the need for caution when applying them for the prediction of the effect of climate change.
Share