Articles | Volume 28, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
08 May 2024
Research article |
| 08 May 2024
| 08 May 2024
Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Marcus Buechel
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
Louise Slater
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
Simon Dadson
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
Related authors
No articles found.
Boen Zhang, Michel Wortmann, Yinxue Liu, Frederik Kratzert, Simon Moulds, and Louise Slater
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-279, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-279, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We created a new global hydro-environmental database to better describe how rivers are connected and how surrounding environments vary across space and time. Most existing databases simplify river networks, miss complex flow paths, and are largely based on older global datasets. Our database provides more than 300 attributes for 19.6 million km of rivers and streams. It supports more accurate study of water movement, environmental change, and climate impacts worldwide.
Haomei Lin, Peirong Lin, Fenghe Zhang, Louise Slater, Yuan Yang, Ming Pan, Qiming Qin, and Aizhong Hou
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1834, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1834, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate streamflow reconstruction is crucial for water resources assessment. Traditional models struggle with land-surface changes and human impacts. This study proposes a residual learning framework that leverages Google’s high-resolution satellite embeddings—compact Earth observation data—to improve hydrologic simulations. Our results show that this AI-driven spatial context enhances river modeling accuracy, offering a scalable solution for data-scarce regions.
Emma Ford, Manuela I. Brunner, Hannah Christensen, and Louise Slater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 2135–2160, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2135-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2135-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to improve prediction and understanding of extreme flood events in near-natural catchments across the United Kingdom. We develop a machine learning framework to assess the contribution of different features to flood magnitude estimation. We find weather patterns are weak predictors and stress the importance of evaluating model performance across and within catchments.
Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, Alexandre Dunant, Amy L. Johnson, Erin L. Harvey, Sihan Li, Katherine Arrell, Jeevan Baniya, Dipak Basnet, Gopi K. Basyal, Nyima Dorjee Bhotia, Simon J. Dadson, Alexander L. Densmore, Tek Bahadur Dong, Mark E. Kincey, Katie Oven, Anuradha Puri, and Nick J. Rosser
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1937–1942, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1937-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1937-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Mapping exposure to landslides is necessary to mitigate risk and reduce vulnerability. In this study, we show that there is a poor correlation between building damage and deaths from landslides, such that the deadliest landslides do not always destroy the most buildings and vice versa. This has important implications for our management of landslide risk.
Simon Moulds, Louise Slater, Louise Arnal, and Andrew W. Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2393–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonal streamflow forecasts are an important component of flood risk management. Here, we train and test a machine learning model to predict the monthly maximum daily streamflow up to 4 months ahead. We train the model on precipitation and temperature forecasts to produce probabilistic hindcasts for 579 stations across the UK for the period 2004–2016. We show skilful results up to 4 months ahead in many locations, although, in general, the skill declines with increasing lead time.
Alexandre Dunant, Tom R. Robinson, Alexander L. Densmore, Nick J. Rosser, Ragindra Man Rajbhandari, Mark Kincey, Sihan Li, Prem Raj Awasthi, Max Van Wyk de Vries, Ramesh Guragain, Erin Harvey, and Simon Dadson
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-267-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-267-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Natural hazards like earthquakes often trigger other disasters, such as landslides, creating complex chains of impacts. We developed a risk model using a mathematical approach called hypergraphs to efficiently measure the impact of interconnected hazards. We showed that it can predict broad patterns of damage to buildings and roads from the 2015 Nepal earthquake. The model's efficiency allows it to generate multiple disaster scenarios, even at a national scale, to support preparedness plans.
Rutong Liu, Jiabo Yin, Louise Slater, Shengyu Kang, Yuanhang Yang, Pan Liu, Jiali Guo, Xihui Gu, Xiang Zhang, and Aliaksandr Volchak
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3305–3326, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3305-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3305-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change accelerates the water cycle and alters the spatiotemporal distribution of hydrological variables, thus complicating the projection of future streamflow and hydrological droughts. We develop a cascade modeling chain to project future bivariate hydrological drought characteristics over China, using five bias-corrected global climate model outputs under three shared socioeconomic pathways, five hydrological models, and a deep-learning model.
Solomon H. Gebrechorkos, Julian Leyland, Simon J. Dadson, Sagy Cohen, Louise Slater, Michel Wortmann, Philip J. Ashworth, Georgina L. Bennett, Richard Boothroyd, Hannah Cloke, Pauline Delorme, Helen Griffith, Richard Hardy, Laurence Hawker, Stuart McLelland, Jeffrey Neal, Andrew Nicholas, Andrew J. Tatem, Ellie Vahidi, Yinxue Liu, Justin Sheffield, Daniel R. Parsons, and Stephen E. Darby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3099–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3099-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3099-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated six high-resolution global precipitation datasets for hydrological modelling. MSWEP and ERA5 showed better performance, but spatial variability was high. The findings highlight the importance of careful dataset selection for river discharge modelling due to the lack of a universally superior dataset. Further improvements in global precipitation data products are needed.
Moctar Dembélé, Mathieu Vrac, Natalie Ceperley, Sander J. Zwart, Josh Larsen, Simon J. Dadson, Grégoire Mariéthoz, and Bettina Schaefli
Proc. IAHS, 385, 121–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-121-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-121-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the impact of climate change on the timing, seasonality and magnitude of mean annual minimum (MAM) flows and annual maximum flows (AMF) in the Volta River basin (VRB). Several climate change projection data are use to simulate river flow under multiple greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Future projections show that AMF could increase with various magnitude but negligible shift in time across the VRB, while MAM could decrease with up to 14 days of delay in occurrence.
Bailey J. Anderson, Manuela I. Brunner, Louise J. Slater, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1567–1583, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Elasticityrefers to how much the amount of water in a river changes with precipitation. We usually calculate this using average streamflow values; however, the amount of water within rivers is also dependent on stored water sources. Here, we look at how elasticity varies across the streamflow distribution and show that not only do low and high streamflows respond differently to precipitation change, but also these differences vary with water storage availability.
Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, Sihan Li, Katherine Arrell, Jeevan Baniya, Dipak Basnet, Gopi K. Basyal, Nyima Dorjee Bhotia, Alexander L. Densmore, Tek Bahadur Dong, Alexandre Dunant, Erin L. Harvey, Ganesh K. Jimee, Mark E. Kincey, Katie Oven, Sarmila Paudyal, Dammar Singh Pujara, Anuradha Puri, Ram Shrestha, Nick J. Rosser, and Simon J. Dadson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-397, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-397, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on understanding soil moisture, a key factor for evaluating hillslope stability and landsliding. In Nepal, where landslides are common, we used a computer model to better understand how rapidly soil dries out after the monsoon season. We calibrated the model using field data and found that, by adjusting soil properties, we could predict moisture levels more accurately. This helps understand where landslides might occur, even where direct measurements are not possible.
Jiabo Yin, Louise J. Slater, Abdou Khouakhi, Le Yu, Pan Liu, Fupeng Li, Yadu Pokhrel, and Pierre Gentine
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5597–5615, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5597-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5597-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents long-term (i.e., 1940–2022) and high-resolution (i.e., 0.25°) monthly time series of TWS anomalies over the global land surface. The reconstruction is achieved by using a set of machine learning models with a large number of predictors, including climatic and hydrological variables, land use/land cover data, and vegetation indicators (e.g., leaf area index). Our proposed GTWS-MLrec performs overall as well as, or is more reliable than, previous TWS datasets.
Solomon H. Gebrechorkos, Jian Peng, Ellen Dyer, Diego G. Miralles, Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano, Chris Funk, Hylke E. Beck, Dagmawi T. Asfaw, Michael B. Singer, and Simon J. Dadson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5449–5466, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5449-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Drought is undeniably one of the most intricate and significant natural hazards with far-reaching consequences for the environment, economy, water resources, agriculture, and societies across the globe. In response to this challenge, we have devised high-resolution drought indices. These indices serve as invaluable indicators for assessing shifts in drought patterns and their associated impacts on a global, regional, and local level facilitating the development of tailored adaptation strategies.
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting systems combine data-driven methods with physics-based weather and climate models to improve the accuracy of predictions for meteorological and hydroclimatic events such as rainfall, temperature, streamflow, floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, or atmospheric rivers. We review recent developments in hybrid forecasting and outline key challenges and opportunities in the field.
Louise J. Slater, Chris Huntingford, Richard F. Pywell, John W. Redhead, and Elizabeth J. Kendon
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1377–1396, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1377-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1377-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work considers how wheat yields are affected by weather conditions during the three main wheat growth stages in the UK. Impacts are strongest in years with compound weather extremes across multiple growth stages. Future climate projections are beneficial for wheat yields, on average, but indicate a high risk of unseen weather conditions which farmers may struggle to adapt to and mitigate against.
Thomas Lees, Steven Reece, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Jens De Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Peter Greve, Louise Slater, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3079–3101, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3079-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3079-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Despite the accuracy of deep learning rainfall-runoff models, we are currently uncertain of what these models have learned. In this study we explore the internals of one deep learning architecture and demonstrate that the model learns about intermediate hydrological stores of soil moisture and snow water, despite never having seen data about these processes during training. Therefore, we find evidence that the deep learning approach learns a physically realistic mapping from inputs to outputs.
Moctar Dembélé, Mathieu Vrac, Natalie Ceperley, Sander J. Zwart, Josh Larsen, Simon J. Dadson, Grégoire Mariéthoz, and Bettina Schaefli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1481–1506, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1481-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1481-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change impacts on water resources in the Volta River basin are investigated under various global warming scenarios. Results reveal contrasting changes in future hydrological processes and water availability, depending on greenhouse gas emission scenarios, with implications for floods and drought occurrence over the 21st century. These findings provide insights for the elaboration of regional adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change.
Manuela I. Brunner and Louise J. Slater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 469–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing the rarity and magnitude of very extreme flood events occurring less than twice a century is challenging due to the lack of observations of such rare events. Here we develop a new approach, pooling reforecast ensemble members from the European Flood Awareness System to increase the sample size available to estimate the frequency of extreme flood events. We demonstrate that such ensemble pooling produces more robust estimates than observation-based estimates.
Thomas Lees, Marcus Buechel, Bailey Anderson, Louise Slater, Steven Reece, Gemma Coxon, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5517–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used deep learning (DL) models to simulate the amount of water moving through a river channel (discharge) based on the rainfall, temperature and potential evaporation in the previous days. We tested the DL models on catchments across Great Britain finding that the model can accurately simulate hydrological systems across a variety of catchment conditions. Ultimately, the model struggled most in areas where there is chalky bedrock and where human influence on the catchment is large.
Louise J. Slater, Bailey Anderson, Marcus Buechel, Simon Dadson, Shasha Han, Shaun Harrigan, Timo Kelder, Katie Kowal, Thomas Lees, Tom Matthews, Conor Murphy, and Robert L. Wilby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3897–3935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3897-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3897-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Weather and water extremes have devastating effects each year. One of the principal challenges for society is understanding how extremes are likely to evolve under the influence of changes in climate, land cover, and other human impacts. This paper provides a review of the methods and challenges associated with the detection, attribution, management, and projection of nonstationary weather and water extremes.
Cited articles
Alton, P., Fisher, R., Los, S., and Williams, M.: Simulations of global evapotranspiration using semiempirical and mechanistic schemes of plant hydrology, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003540, 2009.
Anderson, B. J., Slater, L. J., Dadson, S. J., Blum, A. G., and Prosdocimi, I.: Statistical Attribution of the Influence of Urban and Tree Cover Change on Streamflow: A Comparison of Large Sample Statistical Approaches, Water Resour. Res., 58, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030742, 2022.
Andréassian, V.: Waters and forests: From historical controversy to scientific debate, J. Hydrol., 291, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.015, 2004.
Bastin, J.-F., Finegold, Y., Garcia, C., Mollicone, D., Rezende, M., Routh, D., Zohner, C. M., and Crowther, T. W.: The global tree restoration potential, Science, 365, 76–79, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848, 2019.
Bathurst, J., Birkinshaw, S., Johnson, H., Kenny, A., Napier, A., Raven, S., Robinson, J., and Stroud, R.: Runoff, flood peaks and proportional response in a combined nested and paired forest plantation/peat grassland catchment, J. Hydrol., 564, 916–927, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.039, 2018.
Bathurst, J. C., Fahey, B., Iroumé, A., and Jones, J.: Forests and floods: Using field evidence to reconcile analysis methods, Hydrol. Process., 34, 3295–3310, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13802, 2020.
Beschta, R. L., Pyles, M. R., Skaugset, A. E., and Surfleet, C. G.: Peakflow responses to forest practices in the western cascades of Oregon, USA, J. Hydrol., 233, 102–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00231-6, 2000.
Best, M., Essery, R., and Cox, P.: JULES Technical Documentation MOSES 2.2 Technical Documentation, 36 pp., https://jules.jchmr.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/JULES-Technical-documentation-2.pdf (last access: 21 April 2024), 2009.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Betts, R. A., Boucher, O., Collins, M., Cox, P. M., Falloon, P. D., Gedney, N., Hemming, D. L., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D., Sexton, D. M. H., and Webb, M. J.: Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide, Nature, 448, 1037–1041, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06045, 2007.
Beven, K.: Changing ideas in hydrology – The case of physically-based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7, 1989.
Beven, K.: Towards integrated environmental models of everywhere: Uncertainty, data and modelling as a learning process, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 460–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-460-2007, 2007.
Beven, K. and Lane, S.: On (in)validating environmental models. 1. Principles for formulating a Turing-like Test for determining when a model is fit-for purpose, Hydrol. Process., 36, 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14704, 2022.
Beven, K., Smith, P. J., and Wood, A.: On the colour and spin of epistemic error (and what we might do about it), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3123–3133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3123-2011, 2011.
Beven, K. J.: On hypothesis testing in hydrology: Why falsification of models is still a really good idea, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Water, 5, e1278, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1278, 2018.
Beven, K. J. and Cloke, H. L.: Comment on “Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water” by Eric F. Wood et al., Water Resour. Res., 48, 2–4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr010982, 2012.
Birkinshaw, S. J., Bathurst, J. C., and Robinson, M.: 45 years of non-stationary hydrology over a forest plantation growth cycle, Coalburn catchment, Northern England, J. Hydrol., 519, 559–573, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.050, 2014.
Blair, G. S., Beven, K., Lamb, R., Bassett, R., Cauwenberghs, K., Hankin, B., Dean, G., Hunter, N., Edwards, L., Nundloll, V., Samreen, F., Simm, W., and Towe, R.: Models of everywhere revisited: A technological perspective, Environ. Model. Softw., 122, 104521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104521, 2019.
Blöschl, G., Ardoin-Bardin, S., Bonell, M., Dorninger, M., Goodrich, D., Gutknecht, D., Matamoros, D., Merz, B., Shand, P., and Szolgay, J.: At what scales do climate variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows?, Hydrol. Process., 21, 1241–1247, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6669, 2007.
Blyth, E. M., Martínez-de la Torre, A., and Robinson, E. L.: Trends in evapotranspiration and its drivers in Great Britain: 1961 to 2015, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 43, 666–693, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319841891, 2019.
Blyth, E. M., Arora, V. K., Clark, D. B., Dadson, S. J., De Kauwe, M. G., Lawrence, D. M., Melton, J. R., Pongratz, J., Turton, R. H., Yoshimura, K., and Yuan, H.: Advances in Land Surface Modelling, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 7, 45–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00171-5, 2021.
Bonan, G. B.: Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests, Science, 320, 1444–1449, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155121, 2008.
Bosch, J. M. and Hewlett, J. D.: A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration, J. Hydrol., 55, 3–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2, 1982.
Bradfer-Lawrence, T., Finch, T., Bradbury, R. B., Buchanan, G. M., and Field, R. H.: Mapping potential areas for woodland creation in the UK, 1–13, https://datastorre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/11667/179/2/Mapping potential areas for woodland creation.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2014.
Bradshaw, C. J. A., Sodhi, N. S., Peh, K. S.-H., and Brook, B. W.: Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 2379–2395, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01446.x, 2007.
Broadmeadow, S., Thomas, H., Nisbet, T., Valatin, G., Nisbet, T., and Valatin, G.: Valuing flood regulation services of existing forest cover to inform natural capital accounts, The Research Agency of the Forestry Commission, 28 pp., https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2019/02/final_report_valuing_flood_regulation_services_051218.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2018.
Brown, A. E., Western, A. W., McMahon, T. A., and Zhang, L.: Impact of forest cover changes on annual streamflow and flow duration curves, J. Hydrol., 483, 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.031, 2013.
Brunner, M. I., Slater, L., Tallaksen, L. M., and Clark, M.: Challenges in modeling and predicting floods and droughts: A review, WIREs Water, 8, 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1520, 2021.
Buechel, M.: Realistic afforestation scenarios in Great Britain at a 1 km scale to run with the land surface model JULES, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7957084, 2023.
Buechel, M., Slater, L., and Dadson, S.: Hydrological impact of widespread afforestation in Great Britain using a large ensemble of modelled scenarios, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00334-0, 2022.
Burke, T., Rowland, C., Whyatt, J. D., Blackburn, G. A., and Abbatt, J.: Achieving national scale targets for carbon sequestration through afforestation: Geospatial assessment of feasibility and policy implications, Environ. Sci. Policy, 124, 279–292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.06.023, 2021.
Carrick, J., Abdul Rahim, M. S. A. Bin, Adjei, C., Ashraa Kalee, H. H. H., Banks, S. J., Bolam, F. C., Campos Luna, I. M., Clark, B., Cowton, J., Domingos, I. F. N., Golicha, D. D., Gupta, G., Grainger, M., Hasanaliyeva, G., Hodgson, D. J., Lopez-Capel, E., Magistrali, A. J., Merrell, I. G., Oikeh, I., Othman, M. S., Ranathunga Mudiyanselage, T. K. R., Samuel, C. W. C., Sufar, E. K. H., Watson, P. A., Zakaria, N. N. A. B., and Stewart, G.: Is planting trees the solution to reducing flood risks?, J. Flood Risk Manage., 12, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12484, 2019.
Clark, D. B. and Gedney, N.: Representing the effects of subgrid variability of soil moisture on runoff generation in a land surface model, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D10111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008940, 2008.
Clark, D. B., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Jones, C. D., Gedney, N., Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Harding, R. J., Huntingford, C., and Cox, P. M.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 701–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011, 2011.
Clark, M. P., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., Peters, N. E., and Freer, J. E.: Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale, Hydrol. Process., 23, 311–319, 2009.
Clark, M. P., Kavetski, D., and Fenicia, F.: Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling, Water Resour. Res., 47, W09301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009827, 2011.
Clark, M. P., Zolfaghari, R., Green, K. R., Trim, S., Knoben, W. J. M., Bennett, A., Nijssen, B., Ireson, A., and Spiteri, R. J.: The numerical implementation of land models: Problem formulation and laugh tests, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 1627–1648, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0175.1, 2021.
Committee on Climate Change: Land use: Reducing emissions and preparing for climate change, 100, 2018.
Committee on Climate Change: Net Zero: The UK's contribution to stopping global warming, Comm. Clim. Change, 277 pp., https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Net-Zero-The-UKs-contribution-to-stopping-global-warming.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2019a.
Committee on Climate Change: Net Zero Technical Report, 269 pp., https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Net-Zero-Technical-report-CCC.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2019b.
Cook-Patton, S. C., Leavitt, S. M., Gibbs, D., Harris, N. L., Lister, K., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Briggs, R. D., Chazdon, R. L., Crowther, T. W., Ellis, P. W., Griscom, H. P., Herrmann, V., Holl, K. D., Houghton, R. A., Larrosa, C., Lomax, G., Lucas, R., Madsen, P., Malhi, Y., Paquette, A., Parker, J. D., Paul, K., Routh, D., Roxburgh, S., Saatchi, S., van den Hoogen, J., Walker, W. S., Wheeler, C. E., Wood, S. A., Xu, L., and Griscom, B. W.: Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth, Nature, 585, 545–550, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x, 2020.
Cooper, H. M., Bennett, E., Blake, J., Blyth, E., Boorman, D., Cooper, E., Evans, J., Fry, M., Jenkins, A., Morrison, R., Rylett, D., Stanley, S., Szczykulska, M., Trill, E., Antoniou, V., Askquith-Ellis, A., Ball, L., Brooks, M., Clarke, M. A., Cowan, N., Cumming, A., Farrand, P., Hitt, O., Lord, W., Scarlett, P., Swain, O., Thornton, J., Warwick, A., and Winterbourn, B.: COSMOS-UK: National soil moisture and hydrometeorology data for environmental science research, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1737–1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1737-2021, 2021a.
Cooper, M., Patil, S. D., Nisbet, T. R., Thomas, H., Smith, A. R., and McDonald, M. A.: Role of forested land for natural flood management in the UK: A review, WIREs Water, 8, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1541, 2021b.
Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C., and Harding, R. J.: A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme, J. Hydrol., 212–213, 79–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00203-0, 1998.
Crooks, S. M., Kay, A. L., Davies, H. N., and Bell, V. A.: From catchment to national scale rainfall-runoff modelling: Demonstration of a hydrological modelling framework, Hydrology, 1, 63–88, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology1010063, 2014.
Cui, J., Lian, X., Huntingford, C., Gimeno, L., Wang, T., Ding, J., He, M., Xu, H., Chen, A., Gentine, P., and Piao, S.: Global water availability boosted by vegetation-driven changes in atmospheric moisture transport, Nat. Geosci., 15, 982–988, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01061-7, 2022.
Cuntz, M., Mai, J., Samaniego, L., Clark, M., Wulfmeyer, V., Branch, O., Attinger, S., and Thober, S.: The impact of standard and hard-coded parameters on the hydrologic fluxes in the Noah-MP land surface model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 10676–10700, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025097, 2016.
Dadson, S. J.: Statistical Analysis of Geographical Data, John Wiley & Sons, 252 pp., ISBN 0470977043, 2017.
Dadson, S. J., Bell, V. A., and Jones, R. G.: Evaluation of a grid-based river flow model configured for use in a regional climate model, J. Hydrol., 411, 238–250, 2011.
Dadson, S. J., Hall, J. W., Murgatroyd, A., Acreman, M., Bates, P., Beven, K., Heathwaite, L., Holden, J., Holman, I. P., Lane, S. N., O'Connell, E., Penning-Rowsell, E., Reynard, N., Sear, D., Thorne, C., and Wilby, R.: A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based `natural' flood management in the UK, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 473, 20160706, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706, 2017.
Davies, H., Rameshwaran, P., and V, B.: Gridded (1 km) physical river characteristics for the UK, UK CEH, https://doi.org/10.5285/6da95899-f3b8-4089-b621-560818aa78ba, 2022.
Denissen, J. M. C., Teuling, A. J., Pitman, A. J., Koirala, S., Migliavacca, M., Li, W., Reichstein, M., Winkler, A. J., Zhan, C., and Orth, R.: Widespread shift from ecosystem energy to water limitation with climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 12, 677–684, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01403-8, 2022.
Dick, J., Miller, J. D., Carruthers-Jones, J., Dobel, A. J., Carver, S., Garbutt, A., Hester, A., Hails, R., Magreehan, V., and Quinn, M.: How are nature based solutions contributing to priority societal challenges surrounding human well-being in the United Kingdom: A systematic map protocol, Environ. Evid., 8, 37, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0180-4, 2019.
Do, H. X., Westra, S., and Leonard, M.: A global-scale investigation of trends in annual maximum streamflow, J. Hydrol., 552, 28–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.015, 2017.
Don, A., Rebmann, C., Kolle, O., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., and Schulze, E. D.: Impact of afforestation-associated management changes on the carbon balance of grassland, Global Change Biol., 15, 1990–2002, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01873.x, 2009.
Ellison, D., Futter, M. N., and Bishop, K.: On the forest cover-water yield debate: From demand- to supply-side thinking, Global Change Biol., 18, 806–820, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02589.x, 2012.
Environment Agency: Mapping the potential for Working with Natural Processes-technical report Mapping the potential for Working with Natural Processes-technical report SC150005, 85 pp., https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6036c659d3bf7f0ab2f070c1/Working_with_natural_processes_mapping_technical_report.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2018.
Farley, K. A., Jobbágy, E. G., and Jackson, R. B.: Effects of afforestation on water yield: A global synthesis with implications for policy, Global Change Biol., 11, 1565–1576, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01011.x, 2005.
Feeney, C. J., Cosby, B. J., Robinson, D. A., Thomas, A., Emmett, B. A., and Henrys, P.: Multiple soil map comparison highlights challenges for predicting topsoil organic carbon concentration at national scale, Sci. Rep., 12, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05476-5, 2022.
Fenner, R.: Spatial evaluation of multiple benefits to encourage multi-functional design of sustainable drainage in Blue-Green cities, Water, 9, 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120953, 2017.
Forest Research: Forestry Statistics 2021 – Chapter 1: Woodland Area and Planting, 60 pp., https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/statistics/forestry-statistics/forestry-statistics-2020/1-woodland-area-and-planting/ (last access: 30 April 2024), 2021a.
Forest Research: Provisional Woodland Statistics, 2021 Edition, 1–33, https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/statistics/statistics-by-topic/woodland-statistics/ (last access: 30 April 2024), 2021b.
Fosser, G., Kendon, E., Chan, S., Lock, A., Roberts, N., and Bush, M.: Optimal configuration and resolution for the first convection-permitting ensemble of climate projections over the United Kingdom, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 3585–3606, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6415, 2020.
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., Westra, S., Allan, R. P., Ban, N., Barbero, R., Berg, P., Blenkinsop, S., Do, H. X., Guerreiro, S., Haerter, J. O., Kendon, E. J., Lewis, E., Schaer, C., Sharma, A., Villarini, G., Wasko, C., and Zhang, X.: Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 2, 107–122, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6, 2021.
Friedlingstein, P., Allen, M., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Comment on “The global tree restoration potential,” Science, 366, 76–79, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8060, 2019.
Fuller, R., Smith, G., Sanderson, J., Hill, R. A., Thomson, A. G., Cox, R., Brown, N. J., Clarke, R. T., Rothery, P., and Gerard, F. F.: Land cover map 2000 – final report, UK CEH, https://doi.org/10.5285/f802edfc-86b7-4ab9-b8fa-87e9135237c9, 2002.
Gao, J., Kirkby, M., and Holden, J.: The effect of interactions between rainfall patterns and land-cover change on flood peaks in upland peatlands, J. Hydrol., 567, 546–559, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.039, 2018.
Gedney, N., Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Boucher, O., Huntingford, C., and Stott, P. A.: Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records, Nature, 439, 835–838, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04504, 2006.
Gedney, N., Huntingford, C., Weedon, G. P., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., and Cox, P. M.: Detection of solar dimming and brightening effects on Northern Hemisphere river flow, Nat. Geosci., 7, 796–800, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2263, 2014.
Grassi, G., House, J., Dentener, F., Federici, S., Den Elzen, M., and Penman, J.: The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 220–226, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3227, 2017.
Griffin, A., Vesuviano, G., and Stewart, E.: Have trends changed over time? A study of UK peak flow data and sensitivity to observation period, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2157–2167, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2157-2019, 2019.
Griffin, A., Kay, A., Stewart, L., and Spencer, P.: Climate change allowances, non-stationarity and flood frequency analyses, J. Flood Risk Manage., 15, e12783, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12783, 2022a.
Griffin, A., Kay, A., Sayers, P., Bell, V., Stewart, E., and Carr, S.: Widespread flooding dynamics changing under climate change: characterising floods using UKCP18, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-243, in review, 2022b.
Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J. V., Smith, P., Woodbury, P., Zganjar, C., Blackman, A., Campari, J., Conant, R. T., Delgado, C., Elias, P., Gopalakrishna, T., Hamsik, M. R., Herrero, M., Kiesecker, J., Landis, E., Laestadius, L., Leavitt, S. M., Minnemeyer, S., Polasky, S., Potapov, P., Putz, F. E., Sanderman, J., Silvius, M., Wollenberg, E., and Fargione, J.: Natural climate solutions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 11645–11650, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114, 2017.
Gudmundsson, L., Leonard, M., Do, H. X., Westra, S., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Observed Trends in Global Indicators of Mean and Extreme Streamflow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 756–766, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079725, 2019.
Gupta, H. V, Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Gush, M. B., Scott, D. F., Jewitt, G. P. W., Schulze, R. E., Hallowes, L. A., and Görgens, A. H. M.: A new approach to modelling streamflow reductions resulting from commercial afforestation in South Africa, S. Afr. Forest. J., 196, 27–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/20702620.2002.10434615, 2002.
Hannaford, J., Mastrantonas, N., Vesuviano, G., and Turner, S.: An updated national-scale assessment of trends in UK peak river flow data: How robust are observed increases in flooding?, Hydrol. Res., 52, 699–718, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.156, 2021.
Harding, R. J., Weedon, G. P., van Lanen, H. A. J., and Clark, D. B.: The future for global water assessment, J. Hydrol., 518, 186–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.014, 2014.
Harper, A. B., Cox, P. M., Friedlingstein, P., Wiltshire, A. J., Jones, C. D., Sitch, S., Mercado, L. M., Groenendijk, M., Robertson, E., Kattge, J., Bönisch, G., Atkin, O. K., Bahn, M., Cornelissen, J., Niinemets, Ü., Onipchenko, V., Peñuelas, J., Poorter, L., Reich, P. B., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., and Van Bodegom, P.: Improved representation of plant functional types and physiology in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES v4.2) using plant trait information, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2415–2440, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2415-2016, 2016.
Harper, A. B., Williams, K. E., Mcguire, P. C., Duran Rojas, M. C., Hemming, D., Verhoef, A., Huntingford, C., Rowland, L., Marthews, T., Breder Eller, C., Mathison, C., Nobrega, R. L. B., Gedney, N., Vidale, P. L., Otu-Larbi, F., Pandey, D., Garrigues, S., Wright, A., Slevin, D., De Kauwe, M. G., Blyth, E., Ardö;, J., Black, A., Bonal, D., Buchmann, N., Burban, B., Fuchs, K., De Grandcourt, A., Mammarella, I., Merbold, L., Montagnani, L., Nouvellon, Y., Restrepo-Coupe, N., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Improvement of modeling plant responses to low soil moisture in JULESvn4.9 and evaluation against flux tower measurements, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3269–3294, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3269-2021, 2021.
Harrigan, S., Hannaford, J., Muchan, K., and Marsh, T. J.: Designation and trend analysis of the updated UK Benchmark Network of river flow stations: The UKBN2 dataset, Hydrol. Res., 49, 552–567, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.058, 2018.
Hausfather, Z. and Peters, G. P.: Emissions – the `business as usual' story is misleading, Nature, 577, 618–620, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3, 2020.
Hawes, M.: Planting carbon storage, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 556–558, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0214-x, 2018.
Helsel, D. R., Hirsch, R. M., Ryberg, K. R., Archfield, S. A., and Gilroy, E. J.: Statistical methods in water resources: US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, USGS, 458 pp., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4A3, 2020.
Hoek van Dijke, A. J., Herold, M., Mallick, K., Benedict, I., Machwitz, M., Schlerf, M., Pranindita, A., Theeuwen, J. J. E., Bastin, J. F., and Teuling, A. J.: Shifts in regional water availability due to global tree restoration, Nat. Geosci., 15, 363–368, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00935-0, 2022.
Hrachowitz, M. and Clark, M. P.: HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3953–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017, 2017.
Hudson, J. A., Crane, S. B., and Robinson, M.: The impact of the growth of new plantation forestry on evaporation and streamflow in the Llanbrynmair catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 463–475, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-1-463-1997, 1997.
Hung, C.-L. J., James, L. A., Carbone, G. J., and Williams, J. M.: Impacts of combined land-use and climate change on streamflow in two nested catchments in the Southeastern United States, Ecol. Eng., 143, 105665, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105665, 2020.
Iacob, O., Brown, I., and Rowan, J.: Natural flood management, land use and climate change trade-offs: the case of Tarland catchment, Scotland, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 62, 1931–1948, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1366657, 2017.
IPPC: Climate Change and Land, An IPCC Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, 1542 pp., https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710644, 2019.
Jules-Lsm: Jules-Lsm.github.io, GitHub [code], https://github.com/jules-lsm/jules-lsm.github.io (last access: 21 April 2024), 2024.
Kay, A. L.: Simulation of river flow in Britain under climate change: Baseline performance and future seasonal changes, Hydrol. Process., 35, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14137, 2021.
Kay, A. L., Griffin, A., Rudd, A. C., Chapman, R. M., Bell, V. A., and Arnell, N. W.: Climate change effects on indicators of high and low river flow across Great Britain, Adv. Water Resour., 151, 103909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103909, 2021.
Kellner, E. and Hubbart, J. A.: Land use impacts on floodplain water table response to precipitation events, Ecohydrology, 11, e1913, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1913, 2018.
Kendon, E. J., Fischer, E. M., and Short, C. J.: Variability conceals emerging trend in 100 yr projections of UK local hourly rainfall extremes, Nat. Commun., 14, 1133, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36499-9, 2023.
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash-Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
Kundzewicz, Z. W.: Nonstationarity in water resources – Central European perspective, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 47, 550–562, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00549.x, 2011.
La Follette, P. T., Teuling, A. J., Addor, N., Clark, M., Jansen, K., and Melsen, L. A.: Numerical daemons of hydrological models are summoned by extreme precipitation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5425–5446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5425-2021, 2021.
Lane, R. A., Coxon, G., Freer, J. E., Wagener, T., Johnes, P. J., Bloomfield, J. P., Greene, S., Macleod, C. J. A., and Reaney, S. M.: Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4011–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019, 2019.
Lane, R. A. and Kay, A. L.: Climate Change Impact on the Magnitude and Timing of Hydrological Extremes Across Great Britain, Front. Water, 3, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.684982, 2021.
Lane, R. A., Freer, J. E., Coxon, G., and Wagener, T.: Incorporating Uncertainty Into Multiscale Parameter Regionalization to Evaluate the Performance of Nationally Consistent Parameter Fields for a Hydrological Model, Water Resour. Res., 57, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028393, 2021.
Lee, D., Min, S. K., Park, I. H., Ahn, J. B., Cha, D. H., Chang, E. C., and Byun, Y. H.: Enhanced Role of Convection in Future Hourly Rainfall Extremes Over South Korea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099727, 2022.
Lees, T., Buechel, M., Anderson, B., Slater, L., Reece, S., Coxon, G., and Dadson, S. J.: Benchmarking data-driven rainfall-runoff models in Great Britain: A comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models with four lumped conceptual models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5517–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021, 2021.
Leung, J. Y. S., Russell, B. D., and Connell, S. D.: Global Warming of 1.5 °C – Summary for Policymakers, Intergov. Panel Clim. Change, 1, 374–381, 2019.
Le Vine, N., Butler, A., McIntyre, N., and Jackson, C.: Diagnosing hydrological limitations of a land surface model: Application of JULES to a deep-groundwater chalk basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-143-2016, 2016.
Lewis, H. W. and Dadson, S. J.: A regional coupled approach to water cycle prediction during winter 2013/14 in the United Kingdom, Hydrol. Process., 35, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14438, 2021.
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A., and Koch, A.: Regenerate natural forests to store carbon, Nature, 568, 25–28, 2019.
Li, Y., Piao, S., Li, L. Z. X., Chen, A., Wang, X., Ciais, P., Huang, L., Lian, X., Peng, S., Zeng, Z., Wang, K., and Zhou, L.: Divergent hydrological response to large-scale afforestation and vegetation greening in China, Sci. Adv., 4, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar4182, 2018.
Lowe, J. A., Bernie, D., Bett, P., Bricheno, L., Brown, S., Calvert, D., Clark, R., Eagle, K., Edwards, T., Fosser, G., Fung, F., Gohar, L., Good, P., Gregory, J., Harris, G., Howard, T., Kaye, N., Kendon, E., Krijnen, J., Maisey, P., McDonald, R., McInnes, R., McSweeney, C., Mitchell, J. F. B., Murphy, J., Palmer, M., Roberts, C., Rostron, J., Sexton, D., Thornton, H., Tinker, J., Tucker, S., Yamazaki, K., and Belcher, S.: UKCP18 science overview report, Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, 1–73, https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Overview-report.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2018.
Mai, J., Craig, J. R., and Tolson, B. A.: Simultaneously determining global sensitivities of model parameters and model structure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5835–5858, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5835-2020, 2020.
Marc, V. and Robinson, M.: The long-term water balance (1972–2004) of upland forestry and grassland at Plynlimon, mid-Wales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 44–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-44-2007, 2007.
Martínez-de la Torre, A., Blyth, E. M., and Robinson, E. L.: Water, carbon and energy fluxes simulation for Great Britain using the JULES Land Surface Model and the Climate Hydrology and Ecology research Support System meteorology dataset (1961–2015) [CHESS-land], UK CEH, https://doi.org/10.5285/c76096d6-45d4-4a69-a310-4c67f8dcf096, 2018.
Martínez-de la Torre, A., Blyth, E. M., and Weedon, G. P.: Using observed river flow data to improve the hydrological functioning of the JULES land surface model (vn4.3) used for regional coupled modelling in Great Britain (UKC2), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 765–784, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-765-2019, 2019.
Mathison, C., Burke, E., Hartley, A. J., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C., Robertson, E., Gedney, N., Williams, K., Wiltshire, A., Ellis, R. J., Sellar, A. A., and Jones, C. D.: Description and evaluation of the JULES-ES set-up for ISIMIP2b, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4249–4264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, 2023.
Meier, R., Schwaab, J., Seneviratne, S. I., Sprenger, M., Lewis, E., and Davin, E. L.: Empirical estimate of forestation-induced precipitation changes in Europe, Nat. Geosci., 14, 473–478, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00773-6, 2021.
Met Office: UKCP18 Regional Projections on a 12 km grid over the UK for 1980–2080, https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/589211abeb844070a95d061c8cc7f604 (last access: 30 April 2024), 2018.
Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Climate change: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?, Science, 319, 573–574, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915, 2008.
Moore, R. J.: The PDM rainfall-runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 483–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-483-2007, 2007.
Murphy, J., Harris, G., Sexton, D., Kendon, E., Bett, P., Clark, R., Eagle, K., Fosser, G., Fung, F., Lowe, J., McDonald, R., McInnes, R., McSweeney, C., Mitchell, J., Rostron, J., Thornton, H., Tucker, S., and Yamazaki, K.: UKCP18 Land report, UKCP18 L. Proj. Sci. Rep. 2018, Met Office, https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Land-report.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2019.
Murphy, T. R., Hanley, M. E., Ellis, J. S., and Lunt, P. H.: Native woodland establishment improves soil hydrological functioning in UK upland pastoral catchments, Land Degrad. Dev., 32, 1034–1045, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3762, 2021.
Newson, M. D. and Calder, I. R.: Forests and water resources: problems of prediction on a regional scale, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 324, 283–298, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1989.0049, 1989.
Nisbet, T. and Thomas, H.: Trees, woodlands and flooding, Q. J. Forest., 115, 55–63, 2021.
Nisbet, T., Silgram, M., Shah, N., Morrow, K., and Broadmeadow, S.: Woodland for Water: Woodland measures for meeting Water Framework Directive objectives, Forest Research, 156 pp., https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2022/02/frmg004_woodland4water-2.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2011.
NOAA: Global Monitoring Laboratory – Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases: Trends in CO2, https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/mlo.html (last access: 31 October 2022), 2022.
O'Briain, R., Shephard, S., Matson, R., Gordon, P., and Kelly, F. L.: The efficacy of riparian tree cover as a climate change adaptation tool is affected by hydromorphological alterations, Hydrol. Process., 34, 2433–2449, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13739, 2020.
Oldfield, E. E., Warren, R. J., Felson, A. J., and Bradford, M. A.: FORUM: Challenges and future directions in urban afforestation, J. Appl. Ecol., 50, 1169–1177, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12124, 2013.
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Lerat, J., and Michel, C.: Has land cover a significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment using 1508 catchments, J. Hydrol., 357, 303–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.021, 2008.
Page, T., Chappell, N. A., Beven, K. J., Hankin, B., and Kretzschmar, A.: Assessing the significance of wet-canopy evaporation from forests during extreme rainfall events for flood mitigation in mountainous regions of the United Kingdom, Hydrol. Process., 34, 4740–4754, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13895, 2020.
Palmer, L.: How trees and forests reduce risks from climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 374–377, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01041-6, 2021.
Pattison, I. and Lane, S. N.: The link between land-use management and fluvial flood risk: A chaotic conception?, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 36, 72–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311425398, 2012.
Peng, J., Tanguy, M., Robinson, E. L., Pinnington, E., Evans, J., Ellis, R., Cooper, E., Hannaford, J., Blyth, E., and Dadson, S.: Estimation and evaluation of high-resolution soil moisture from merged model and Earth observation data in the Great Britain, Remote Sens. Environ., 264, 112610, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112610, 2021.
Peskett, L., MacDonald, A., Heal, K., McDonnell, J., Chambers, J., Uhlemann, S., Upton, K., and Black, A.: The impact of across-slope forest strips on hillslope subsurface hydrological dynamics, J. Hydrol., 581, 124427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124427, 2020.
Prudhomme, C., Parry, S., Hannaford, J., Clark, D. B., Hagemann, S., and Voss, F.: How well do large-scale models reproduce regional hydrological extremes: In Europe?, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 1181–1204, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1387.1, 2011.
Prudhomme, C., Dadson, S., Morris, D., Williamson, J., Goodsell, G., Crooks, S., Boelee, L., Davies, H., Buys, G., Lafon, T., and Watts, G.: Future flows climate: An ensemble of 1-km climate change projections for hydrological application in Great Britain, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 4, 143–148, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-4-143-2012, 2012.
Prudhomme, C., Giuntoli, I., Robinson, E. L., Clark, D. B., Arnell, N. W., Dankers, R., Fekete, B. M., Franssen, W., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N., Hagemann, S., Hannah, D. M., Kim, H., Masaki, Y., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Wada, Y., and Wisser, D.: Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3262–3267, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222473110, 2014.
Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O'Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Cuaresma, J. C., KC, S., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., Ebi, K., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Da Silva, L. A., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Bosetti, V., Eom, J., Gernaat, D., Masui, T., Rogelj, J., Strefler, J., Drouet, L., Krey, V., Luderer, G., Harmsen, M., Takahashi, K., Baumstark, L., Doelman, J. C., Kainuma, M., Klimont, Z., Marangoni, G., Lotze-Campen, H., Obersteiner, M., Tabeau, A., and Tavoni, M.: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview, Global Environ. Change, 42, 153–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009, 2017.
Ritchie, P. D. L., Harper, A. B., Smith, G. S., Kahana, R., Kendon, E. J., Lewis, H., Fezzi, C., Halleck-Vega, S., Boulton, C. A., Bateman, I. J., and Lenton, T. M.: Large changes in Great Britain's vegetation and agricultural land-use predicted under unmitigated climate change, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 114012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab492b, 2019.
Roberts, J. and Rosier, P.: The impact of broadleaved woodland on water resources in lowland UK: I. Soil water changes below beech woodland and grass on chalk sites in Hampshire, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 596–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-596-2005, 2005.
Robinson, E. L., Blyth, E. M., Clark, D. B., Comyn-Platt, E., Finch, J., and Rudd, A. C.: Climate hydrology and ecology research support system meteorology dataset for Great Britain (1961–2015) [CHESS-met] v1.2, NERC Environmental Information Data Centre [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/b745e7b1-626c-4ccc-ac27-56582e77b900, 2017a.
Robinson, E. L., Blyth, E. M., Clark, D. B., Finch, J., and Rudd, A. C.: Trends in atmospheric evaporative demand in Great Britain using high-resolution meteorological data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1189–1224, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1189-2017, 2017b.
Robinson, E. L., Huntingford, C., Semeena, V. S., and Bullock, J. M.: CHESS-SCAPE: Future projections of meteorological variables at 1 km resolution for the United Kingdom 1980–2080 derived from UK Climate Projections 2018, NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/8194b416cbee482b89e0dfbe17c5786c, 2022.
Roebroek, C. T. J., Melsen, L. A., Hoek van Dijke, A. J., Fan, Y., and Teuling, A. J.: Global distribution of hydrologic controls on forest growth, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4625–4639, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4625-2020, 2020.
Rogger, M., Agnoletti, M., Alaoui, A., Bathurst, J. C., Bodner, G., Borga, M., Chaplot, V., Gallart, F., Glatzel, G., Hall, J., Holden, J., Holko, L., Horn, R., Kiss, A., Kohnová, S., Leitinger, G., Lennartz, B., Parajka, J., Perdigão, R., Peth, S., Plavcová, L., Quinton, J. N., Robinson, M., Salinas, J. L., Santoro, A., Szolgay, J., Tron, S., van den Akker, J. J. H., Viglione, A., and Blöschl, G.: Land use change impacts on floods at the catchment scale: Challenges and opportunities for future research, Water Resour. Res., 53, 5209–5219, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020723, 2017.
ROSE: Rose Documentation, GitHub, https://metomi.github.io/rose/doc/html/index.html (last access: 21 April 2024), 2024.
Schwaab, J., Davin, E. L., Bebi, P., Duguay-Tetzlaff, A., Waser, L. T., Haeni, M., and Meier, R.: Increasing the broad-leaved tree fraction in European forests mitigates hot temperature extremes, Sci. Rep., 10, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71055-1, 2020.
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J. J., Smith, A., and Turner, B.: Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 375, 20190120, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120, 2020.
Seddon, N., Smith, A., Smith, P., Key, I., Chausson, A., Girardin, C., House, J., Srivastava, S., and Turner, B.: Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change, Global Change Biol., 27, 1518–1546, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15513, 2021.
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934, 1968.
Shuttleworth, E. L., Evans, M. G., Pilkington, M., Spencer, T., Walker, J., Milledge, D., and Allott, T. E. H.: Restoration of blanket peat moorland delays stormflow from hillslopes and reduces peak discharge, J. Hydrol. X, 2, 100006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2018.100006, 2019.
Sing, L. and Aitkenhead, M.: Analysis of land suitability for woodland expansion in Scotland: update 2020, Edinburgh Research Archive, https://doi.org/10.7488/era/494, 2020.
Slater, L. J., Anderson, B., Buechel, M., Dadson, S., Han, S., Harrigan, S., Kelder, T., Kowal, K., Lees, T., Matthews, T., Murphy, C., and Wilby, R. L.: Nonstationary weather and water extremes: a review of methods for their detection, attribution, and management, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3897–3935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3897-2021, 2021b.
Speich, M. J. R., Zappa, M., and Lischke, H.: Sensitivity of forest water balance and physiological drought predictions to soil and vegetation parameters – A model-based study, Environ. Model. Softw., 102, 213–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.016, 2018.
Stratford, C., Miller, J., House, A., Old, G., Acreman, M., Dueñas-Lopez, M. A., Nisbet, T., Newman, J., Burgess-Gamble, L., Chappell, N., Clarke, S., Leeson, L., Monbiot, G., Paterson, J., Robinson, M., Rogers, M., and Tickner, D.: Do Trees in the UK-Relevant River Catchments Influence Fluvial Flood Peaks?, 46 pp., https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/96704761.pdf (last access: 30 April 2024), 2017.
Teuling, A. J., Taylor, C. M., Meirink, J. F., Melsen, L. A., Miralles, D. G., van Heerwaarden, C. C., Vautard, R., Stegehuis, A. I., Nabuurs, G.-J., and de Arellano, J. V.-G.: Observational evidence for cloud cover enhancement over western European forests, Nat. Commun., 8, 14065, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14065, 2017.
Teuling, A. J., de Badts, E. A. G., Jansen, F. A., Fuchs, R., Buitink, J., Hoek van Dijke, A. J., and Sterling, S. M.: Climate change, reforestation/afforestation, and urbanization impacts on evapotranspiration and streamflow in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3631–3652, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3631-2019, 2019.
Theil, H.: A Rank-Invariant Method of Linear and Polynomial Regression Analysis, in: Indagationes mathematicae, vol. 12, Springer, 345–381, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20, 1992.
UKCEH: Climate hydrology and ecology research support system [CHESS], https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/documents/7de9790e-66a2-44b5-988e-283d764ef52f (last access: 21 April 2024), 2024.
Van den Hoof, C., Vidale, P. L., Verhoef, A., and Vincke, C.: Improved evaporative flux partitioning and carbon flux in the land surface model JULES: Impact on the simulation of land surface processes in temperate Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 181, 108–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.011, 2013.
van Genuchten, M. T.: A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x, 1980.
van Kempen, G., van der Wiel, K., and Melsen, L. A.: The impact of hydrological model structure on the simulation of extreme runoff events, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 961–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-961-2021, 2021.
Vereecken, H., Amelung, W., Bauke, S. L., Bogena, H., Brüggemann, N., Montzka, C., Vanderborght, J., Bechtold, M., Blöschl, G., Carminati, A., Javaux, M., Konings, A. G., Kusche, J., Neuweiler, I., Or, D., Steele-Dunne, S., Verhoef, A., Young, M., and Zhang, Y.: Soil hydrology in the Earth system, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 573–587, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00324-6, 2022.
Villarini, G. and Wasko, C.: Humans, climate and streamflow, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 725–726, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01137-z, 2021.
Vitolo, C., Fry, M., and Buytaert, W.: Rnrfa: An r package to retrieve, filter and visualize data from the uk national river flow archive, R J., 8, 102–116, https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2016-036, 2016.
Wagener, T., Gleeson, T., Coxon, G., Hartmann, A., Howden, N., Pianosi, F., Rahman, M., Rosolem, R., Stein, L., and Woods, R.: On doing hydrology with dragons: Realizing the value of perceptual models and knowledge accumulation, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Water, 8, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1550, 2021.
Wasko, C.: Review: Can temperature be used to inform changes to flood extremes with global warming?, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20190551, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0551, 2021.
Wasko, C., Sharma, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Increases in temperature do not translate to increased flooding, Nat. Commun., 10, 4–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13612-5, 2019.
Wasko, C., Nathan, R., Stein, L., and O'Shea, D.: Evidence of shorter more extreme rainfalls and increased flood variability under climate change, J. Hydrol., 603, 126994, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126994, 2021.
Welsh Government: Woodland Opportunity Map 2021|DataMapWales, https://datamap.gov.wales/maps/woodland-opportunity-map-2021/ (last access: 4 August 2022), 2022.
Wilby, R. L. and Quinn, N. W.: Reconstructing multi-decadal variations in fluvial flood risk using atmospheric circulation patterns, J. Hydrol., 487, 109–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.038, 2013.
Wilkes, M. A., Bennett, J., Burbi, S., Charlesworth, S., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Rayns, F., Schmutz, U., Smith, B., Tilzey, M., Trenchard, L., and van de Wiel, M.: Making way for trees? Changes in land-use, habitats and protected areas in Great Britain under “Global tree restoration potential”, Sustainability, 12, 5845, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145845, 2020.
Xu, R., Li, Y., Teuling, A. J., Zhao, L., Spracklen, D. V., Garcia-Carreras, L., Meier, R., Chen, L., Zheng, Y., Lin, H., and Fu, B.: Contrasting impacts of forests on cloud cover based on satellite observations, Nat. Commun., 13, 670, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28161-7, 2022.
Young, P. J., Harper, A. B., Huntingford, C., Paul, N. D., Morgenstern, O., Newman, P. A., Oman, L. D., Madronich, S., and Garcia, R. R.: The Montreal Protocol protects the terrestrial carbon sink, Nature, 596, 384–388, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03737-3, 2021.
Zhang, X., Jin, J., Zeng, X., Hawkins, C. P., Neto, A. A. M., and Niu, G.: The Compensatory CO2 Fertilization and Stomatal Closure Effects on Runoff Projection From 2016–2099 in the Western United States, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030046, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr030046, 2022.
Short summary
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large increases in the spatial extent of woodland are not fully understood. In this study, we use a land surface model to simulate hydrology across Great Britain with realistic afforestation scenarios and potential climate changes. Countrywide afforestation minimally influences hydrology, when compared to climate change, and reduces low streamflow whilst not lowering the highest flows.
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large...
