Articles | Volume 27, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-703-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-703-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
09 Feb 2023
Research article |
| 09 Feb 2023
| 09 Feb 2023
Deriving transmission losses in ephemeral rivers using satellite imagery and machine learning
Antoine Di Ciacca
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Environmental Research, Lincoln Agritech Ltd, Lincoln, New
Zealand
Scott Wilson
Environmental Research, Lincoln Agritech Ltd, Lincoln, New
Zealand
Jasmine Kang
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA),
Christchurch, New Zealand
Thomas Wöhling
Environmental Research, Lincoln Agritech Ltd, Lincoln, New
Zealand
Chair of Hydrology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany
Related authors
Scott R. Wilson, Jo Hoyle, Richard Measures, Antoine Di Ciacca, Leanne K. Morgan, Eddie W. Banks, Linda Robb, and Thomas Wöhling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2721–2743, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2721-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Braided rivers are complex and dynamic systems that are difficult to understand. Here, we proposes a new model of how braided rivers work in the subsurface based on field observations in three braided rivers in New Zealand. We suggest that braided rivers create their own shallow aquifers by moving bed sediments during flood flows. This new conceptualisation considers braided rivers as whole “river systems” consisting of channels and a gravel aquifer, which is distinct from the regional aquifer.
Raoul Alexander Collenteur, Ezra Haaf, Mark Bakker, Tanja Liesch, Andreas Wunsch, Jenny Soonthornrangsan, Jeremy White, Nick Martin, Rui Hugman, Michael Fienen, Ed de Sousa, Didier Vanden Berghe, Xinyang Fan, Tim Peterson, Janis Bikše, Antoine Di Ciacca, Xinyue Wang, Yang Zheng, Maximilian Nölscher, Julian Koch, Raphael Schneider, Nikolas Benavides Höglund, Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi, Abel Henriot, Nicolas Massei, Abderrahim Jardani, Max Gustav Rudolph, Amir Rouhani, Jaime Gómez-Hernández, Seifeddine Jomaa, Anna Pölz, Tim Franken, Morteza Behbooei, Jimmy Lin, Bryan Tolson, and Rojin Meysami
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-111, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-111, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of the 2022 groundwater modeling challenge, where 15 teams applied data-driven models to simulate hydraulic heads. 3 groups of models were identified: lumped models, machine learning models, and deep learning models. For all wells, reasonable performance was obtained by at least 1 team from group. There was not 1 team that performed best for all wells. In conclusion, the challenge was a successful initiative to compare different models and learn from each other.
Scott R. Wilson, Jo Hoyle, Richard Measures, Antoine Di Ciacca, Leanne K. Morgan, Eddie W. Banks, Linda Robb, and Thomas Wöhling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2721–2743, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2721-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Braided rivers are complex and dynamic systems that are difficult to understand. Here, we proposes a new model of how braided rivers work in the subsurface based on field observations in three braided rivers in New Zealand. We suggest that braided rivers create their own shallow aquifers by moving bed sediments during flood flows. This new conceptualisation considers braided rivers as whole “river systems” consisting of channels and a gravel aquifer, which is distinct from the regional aquifer.
Raoul Alexander Collenteur, Ezra Haaf, Mark Bakker, Tanja Liesch, Andreas Wunsch, Jenny Soonthornrangsan, Jeremy White, Nick Martin, Rui Hugman, Michael Fienen, Ed de Sousa, Didier Vanden Berghe, Xinyang Fan, Tim Peterson, Janis Bikše, Antoine Di Ciacca, Xinyue Wang, Yang Zheng, Maximilian Nölscher, Julian Koch, Raphael Schneider, Nikolas Benavides Höglund, Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi, Abel Henriot, Nicolas Massei, Abderrahim Jardani, Max Gustav Rudolph, Amir Rouhani, Jaime Gómez-Hernández, Seifeddine Jomaa, Anna Pölz, Tim Franken, Morteza Behbooei, Jimmy Lin, Bryan Tolson, and Rojin Meysami
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-111, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-111, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of the 2022 groundwater modeling challenge, where 15 teams applied data-driven models to simulate hydraulic heads. 3 groups of models were identified: lumped models, machine learning models, and deep learning models. For all wells, reasonable performance was obtained by at least 1 team from group. There was not 1 team that performed best for all wells. In conclusion, the challenge was a successful initiative to compare different models and learn from each other.
Diane von Gunten, Thomas Wöhling, Claus P. Haslauer, Daniel Merchán, Jesus Causapé, and Olaf A. Cirpka
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4159–4175, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4159-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4159-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We compare seven meteorological drought indices that are commonly used to predict future droughts. Our goal is to assess the reliability of these indices to predict hydrological impacts of droughts under changing climatic conditions, using an integrated hydrological model. Drought indices are able to identify the timing of hydrological impacts of droughts in present and future climate. However, these indices can not estimate the severity of hydrological impacts of droughts in future climate.
D. Lemke, R. González-Pinzón, Z. Liao, T. Wöhling, K. Osenbrück, R. Haggerty, and O. A. Cirpka
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3151–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3151-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3151-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject: Rivers and Lakes | Techniques and Approaches: Remote Sensing and GIS
High-resolution automated detection of headwater streambeds for large watersheds
Remote quantification of the trophic status of Chinese lakes
Hydrological regime of Sahelian small waterbodies from combined Sentinel-2 MSI and Sentinel-3 Synthetic Aperture Radar Altimeter data
Long-term water clarity patterns of lakes across China using Landsat series imagery from 1985 to 2020
Changes in glacial lakes in the Poiqu River basin in the central Himalayas
Assimilation of probabilistic flood maps from SAR data into a coupled hydrologic–hydraulic forecasting model: a proof of concept
A simple cloud-filling approach for remote sensing water cover assessments
Evaluation of historic and operational satellite radar altimetry missions for constructing consistent long-term lake water level records
Sentinel-3 radar altimetry for river monitoring – a catchment-scale evaluation of satellite water surface elevation from Sentinel-3A and Sentinel-3B
Assessing the capabilities of the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission for large lake water surface elevation monitoring under different wind conditions
Assimilation of wide-swath altimetry water elevation anomalies to correct large-scale river routing model parameters
Technical Note: Flow velocity and discharge measurement in rivers using terrestrial and unmanned-aerial-vehicle imagery
River-ice and water velocities using the Planet optical cubesat constellation
Exposure of tourism development to salt karst hazards along the Jordanian Dead Sea shore
A global lake and reservoir volume analysis using a surface water dataset and satellite altimetry
Surface water monitoring in small water bodies: potential and limits of multi-sensor Landsat time series
Technical note: Bathymetry observations of inland water bodies using a tethered single-beam sonar controlled by an unmanned aerial vehicle
Satellite-derived light extinction coefficient and its impact on thermal structure simulations in a 1-D lake model
Observing river stages using unmanned aerial vehicles
Quantification of the contribution of the Beauce groundwater aquifer to the discharge of the Loire River using thermal infrared satellite imaging
Swath-altimetry measurements of the main stem Amazon River: measurement errors and hydraulic implications
Satellite radar altimetry for monitoring small rivers and lakes in Indonesia
Quantifying river form variations in the Mississippi Basin using remotely sensed imagery
River ice flux and water velocities along a 600 km-long reach of Lena River, Siberia, from satellite stereo
Geometric dependency of Tibetan lakes on glacial runoff
Assessing the potential hydrological impact of the Gibe III Dam on Lake Turkana water level using multi-source satellite data
River monitoring from satellite radar altimetry in the Zambezi River basin
Flood occurrence mapping of the middle Mahakam lowland area using satellite radar
Satellite remote sensing of water turbidity in Alqueva reservoir and implications on lake modelling
Hydro-physical processes at the plunge point: an analysis using satellite and in situ data
Regional scale analysis of landform configuration with base-level (isobase) maps
Reconstructing the Tropical Storm Ketsana flood event in Marikina River, Philippines
Reading the bed morphology of a mountain stream: a geomorphometric study on high-resolution topographic data
Francis Lessard, Naïm Perreault, and Sylvain Jutras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1027–1040, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1027-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1027-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Headwaters streams, which are small streams at the top of a watershed, represent two-thirds of the total length of streams, yet their exact locations are still unknown. This article compares different techniques in order to remotely detect the position of these streams. Thus, a database of more than 464 km of headwaters was used to explain what drives their presence. A technique developed in this article makes it possible to detect headwater streams with more accuracy, despite the land uses.
Sijia Li, Shiqi Xu, Kaishan Song, Tiit Kutser, Zhidan Wen, Ge Liu, Yingxin Shang, Lili Lyu, Hui Tao, Xiang Wang, Lele Zhang, and Fangfang Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3581–3599, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3581-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3581-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
1. Blue/red and green/red Rrs(λ) are sensitive to lake TSI. 2. Machine learning algorithms reveal optimum performance of TSI retrieval. 3. An accurate TSI model was achieved by MSI imagery data and XGBoost. 4. Trophic status in five limnetic regions was qualified. 5. The 10m TSI products were first produced in 555 typical lakes in China.
Mathilde de Fleury, Laurent Kergoat, and Manuela Grippa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2189–2204, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2189-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2189-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study surveys small lakes and reservoirs, which are vital resources in the Sahel, through a multi-sensor satellite approach. Water height changes compared to evaporation losses in dry seasons highlight anthropogenic withdrawals and water supplies due to river and groundwater connections. Some reservoirs display weak withdrawals, suggesting low usage may be due to security issues. The
satellite-derived water balance thus proved effective in estimating water resources in semi-arid areas.
Xidong Chen, Liangyun Liu, Xiao Zhang, Junsheng Li, Shenglei Wang, Yuan Gao, and Jun Mi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3517–3536, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3517-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3517-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A 30 m LAke Water Secchi Depth (LAWSD30) dataset of China was first developed for 1985–2020, and national-scale water clarity estimations of lakes in China over the past 35 years were analyzed. Lake clarity in China exhibited a significant downward trend before the 21st century, but improved after 2000. The developed LAWSD30 dataset and the evaluation results can provide effective guidance for water preservation and restoration.
Pengcheng Su, Jingjing Liu, Yong Li, Wei Liu, Yang Wang, Chun Ma, and Qimin Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5879–5903, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5879-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5879-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We identified ± 150 glacial lakes in the Poiqu River basin (central Himalayas), and we explore the changes in five lakes over the last few decades based on remote sensing images, field surveys, and satellite photos. We reconstruct the lake basin topography, calculate the water capacity, and propose a water balance equation (WBE) to explain glacial lake evolution in response to local weather conditions. The WBE also provides a framework for the water balance in rivers from glacierized sources.
Concetta Di Mauro, Renaud Hostache, Patrick Matgen, Ramona Pelich, Marco Chini, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Nancy K. Nichols, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4081–4097, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4081-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4081-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates how the sequential assimilation of flood extent derived from synthetic aperture radar data can help improve flood forecasting. In particular, we carried out twin experiments based on a synthetically generated dataset with controlled uncertainty. Our empirical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed data assimilation framework, as forecasting errors are substantially reduced as a result of the assimilation.
Connor Mullen, Gopal Penny, and Marc F. Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2373–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2373-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2373-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The level of lake water is rapidly changing globally, and long-term, consistent observations of lake water extents are essential for ascertaining and attributing these changes. These data are rarely collected and challenging to obtain from satellite imagery. The proposed method addresses these challenges without any local data, and it was successfully validated against lakes with and without ground data. The algorithm is a valuable tool for the reliable historical water extent of changing lakes.
Song Shu, Hongxing Liu, Richard A. Beck, Frédéric Frappart, Johanna Korhonen, Minxuan Lan, Min Xu, Bo Yang, and Yan Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1643–1670, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1643-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1643-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study comprehensively evaluated 11 satellite radar altimetry missions (including their official retrackers) for lake water level retrieval and developed a strategy for constructing consistent long-term water level records for inland lakes. It is a two-step bias correction and normalization procedure. First, we use Jason-2 as the initial reference to form a consistent TOPEX/Poseidon–Jason series. Then, we use this as the reference to remove the biases with other radar altimetry missions.
Cecile M. M. Kittel, Liguang Jiang, Christian Tøttrup, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 333–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-333-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-333-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In poorly instrumented catchments, satellite altimetry offers a unique possibility to obtain water level observations. Improvements in instrument design have increased the capabilities of altimeters to observe inland water bodies, including rivers. In this study, we demonstrate how a dense Sentinel-3 water surface elevation monitoring network can be established at catchment scale using publicly accessible processing platforms. The network can serve as a useful supplement to ground observations.
Jean Bergeron, Gabriela Siles, Robert Leconte, Mélanie Trudel, Damien Desroches, and Daniel L. Peters
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5985–6000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5985-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5985-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We want to assess how well the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission will be able to provide information on lake surface water elevation and how much of an impact wind conditions (speed and direction) can have on these retrievals.
Charlotte Marie Emery, Sylvain Biancamaria, Aaron Boone, Sophie Ricci, Mélanie C. Rochoux, Vanessa Pedinotti, and Cédric H. David
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2207–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2207-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2207-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The flow of freshwater in rivers is commonly studied with computer programs known as hydrological models. An important component of those programs lies in the description of the river environment, such as the channel resistance to the flow, that is critical to accurately predict the river flow but is still not well known. Satellite data can be combined with models to enrich our knowledge of these features. Here, we show that the coming SWOT mission can help better know this channel resistance.
Anette Eltner, Hannes Sardemann, and Jens Grundmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1429–1445, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1429-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1429-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
An automatic workflow is introduced to measure surface flow velocities in rivers. The provided tool enables the measurement of spatially distributed surface flow velocities independently of the image acquisition perspective. Furthermore, the study illustrates how river discharge in previously ungauged and unmeasured regions can be retrieved, considering the image-based flow velocities and digital elevation models of the studied river reach reconstructed with UAV photogrammetry.
Andreas Kääb, Bas Altena, and Joseph Mascaro
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4233–4247, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4233-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4233-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Knowledge of water surface velocities in rivers is useful for understanding a wide range of processes and systems, but is difficult to measure over large reaches. Here, we present a novel method to exploit near-simultaneous imagery produced by the Planet cubesat constellation to track river ice floes and estimate water surface velocities. We demonstrate the method for a 60 km long reach of the Amur River and a 200 km long reach of the Yukon River.
Najib Abou Karaki, Simone Fiaschi, Killian Paenen, Mohammad Al-Awabdeh, and Damien Closson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2111–2127, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2111-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2111-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Dead Sea shore is a unique salt karst system. Development began in the 1960s, when the water resources that used to feed the Dead Sea were diverted. The water level is falling at more than 1 m yr−1, causing a hydrostatic disequilibrium between the underground fresh water and the base level. Despite these conditions, tourism development projects have flourished. Here, we show that a 10 km long strip of coast that encompasses several resorts is exposed to subsidence, sinkholes and landslides.
Tim Busker, Ad de Roo, Emiliano Gelati, Christian Schwatke, Marko Adamovic, Berny Bisselink, Jean-Francois Pekel, and Andrew Cottam
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 669–690, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-669-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-669-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper estimates lake and reservoir volume variations over all continents from 1984 to 2015 using remote sensing alone. This study improves on previous methodologies by using the Global Surface Water dataset developed by the Joint Research Centre, which allowed for volume calculations on a global scale, a high resolution (30 m) and back to 1984 using very detailed lake area dynamics. Using 18 in situ volume time series as validation, our volume estimates showed a high accuracy.
Andrew Ogilvie, Gilles Belaud, Sylvain Massuel, Mark Mulligan, Patrick Le Goulven, and Roger Calvez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4349–4380, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4349-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4349-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate monitoring of surface water extent is essential for hydrological investigation of small lakes (1–10 ha), which supports millions of smallholder farmers. Landsat monitoring of long-term surface water dynamics is shown to be suited to lakes over 3 ha based on extensive hydrometric data from seven field sites over 15 years. MNDWI water classification optimized here for the specificities of small water bodies reduced mean surface area errors by 57 % compared to published global datasets.
Filippo Bandini, Daniel Olesen, Jakob Jakobsen, Cecile Marie Margaretha Kittel, Sheng Wang, Monica Garcia, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4165–4181, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4165-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4165-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Water depth observations are essential data to forecast flood hazard, predict sediment transport, or monitor in-stream habitats. We retrieved bathymetry with a sonar wired to a drone. This system can improve the speed and spatial scale at which water depth observations are retrieved. Observations can be retrieved also in unnavigable or inaccessible rivers. Water depth observations showed an accuracy of ca. 2.1 % of actual depth, without being affected by water turbidity or bed material.
Kiana Zolfaghari, Claude R. Duguay, and Homa Kheyrollah Pour
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 377–391, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-377-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-377-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
A remotely-sensed water clarity value (Kd) was applied to improve FLake model simulations of Lake Erie thermal structure using a time-invariant (constant) annual value as well as monthly values of Kd. The sensitivity of FLake model to Kd values was studied. It was shown that the model is very sensitive to variations in Kd when the value is less than 0.5 m-1.
Tomasz Niedzielski, Matylda Witek, and Waldemar Spallek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3193–3205, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3193-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3193-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We study detectability of changes in water surface areas on orthophotomaps. We use unmanned aerial vehicles to acquire visible light photographs. We offer a new method for detecting changes in water surface areas and river stages. The approach is based on the application of the Student's t test, in asymptotic and bootstrapped versions. We test our approach on aerial photos taken during 3-year observational campaign. We detect transitions between all characteristic river stages using drone data.
E. Lalot, F. Curie, V. Wawrzyniak, F. Baratelli, S. Schomburgk, N. Flipo, H. Piegay, and F. Moatar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4479–4492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4479-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4479-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
This work shows that satellite thermal infrared images (LANDSAT) can be used to locate and quantify groundwater discharge into a large river (Loire River, France - 100 to 300 m wide). Groundwater discharge rate is found to be highly variable with time and space and maximum during flow recession periods and in winter. The main identified groundwater discharge area into the Loire River corresponds to a known discharge area of the Beauce aquifer.
M. D. Wilson, M. Durand, H. C. Jung, and D. Alsdorf
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1943–1959, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1943-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1943-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We use a virtual mission analysis on a ca. 260km reach of the central Amazon River to assess the hydraulic implications of potential measurement errors in swath-altimetry imagery from the forthcoming Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission. We estimated water surface slope from imagery of water heights and then derived channel discharge. Errors in estimated discharge were lowest when using longer reach lengths and channel cross-sectional averaging to estimate water slopes.
Y. B. Sulistioadi, K.-H. Tseng, C. K. Shum, H. Hidayat, M. Sumaryono, A. Suhardiman, F. Setiawan, and S. Sunarso
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 341–359, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-341-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-341-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the possibility of monitoring small water bodies through Envisat altimetry observation. A novel approach is introduced to identify qualified and non-qualified altimetry measurements by assessing the waveform shapes for each returned radar signal. This research indicates that small lakes (extent < 100 km2) and medium-sized rivers (e.g., 200--800 m in width) can be successfully monitored by satellite altimetry.
Z. F. Miller, T. M. Pavelsky, and G. H. Allen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4883–4895, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4883-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4883-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
Many previous studies have used stream gauge data to estimate patterns of river width and depth based on variations in river discharge. However, these relationships may not capture all of the actual variability in width and depth. We have instead mapped the widths of all of the rivers wider than 100 m (and many narrower) in the Mississippi Basin and then used them to also improve estimates of depth as well. Our results show width and depth variations not captured by power-law relationships.
A. Kääb, M. Lamare, and M. Abrams
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4671–4683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4671-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4671-2013, 2013
V. H. Phan, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. Menenti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4061–4077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4061-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4061-2013, 2013
N. M. Velpuri and G. B. Senay
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3561–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3561-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3561-2012, 2012
C. I. Michailovsky, S. McEnnis, P. A. M. Berry, R. Smith, and P. Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2181–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2181-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2181-2012, 2012
H. Hidayat, D. H. Hoekman, M. A. M. Vissers, and A. J. F. Hoitink
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1805–1816, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1805-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1805-2012, 2012
M. Potes, M. J. Costa, and R. Salgado
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1623–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1623-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1623-2012, 2012
A. T. Assireu, E. Alcântara, E. M. L. M. Novo, F. Roland, F. S. Pacheco, J. L. Stech, and J. A. Lorenzzetti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3689–3700, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3689-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3689-2011, 2011
C. H. Grohmann, C. Riccomini, and M. A. C. Chamani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1493–1504, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1493-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1493-2011, 2011
C. C. Abon, C. P. C. David, and N. E. B. Pellejera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1283–1289, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1283-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1283-2011, 2011
S. Trevisani, M. Cavalli, and L. Marchi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 393–405, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-393-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-393-2010, 2010
Cited articles
Anderson, E. I.: Modeling groundwater–surface water interactions using the
Dupuit approximation, Adv. Water Resour., 28, 315–327,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.11.007, 2005. a
Arscott, D. B., Larned, S., Scarsbrook, M. R., and Lambert, P.: Aquatic
invertebrate community structure along an intermittence gradient: Selwyn
River, New Zealand, J. N. Am. Benthol. Sc., 29,
530–545, https://doi.org/10.1899/08-124.1, 2010. a
Banks, E. W., Morgan, L. K., Sai Louie, A. J., Dempsey, D., and Wilson,
S. R.: Active distributed temperature sensing to assess surface
water–groundwater interaction and river loss in braided river systems,
J. Hydrol., 615, 128667,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128667, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f
Baudron, P., Alonso-Sarría, F., García-Aróstegui, J. L.,
Cánovas-García, F., Martínez-Vicente, D., and
Moreno-Brotóns, J.: Identifying the origin of groundwater samples in a
multi-layer aquifer system with Random Forest classification, J. Hydrol., 499, 303–315, 2013. a
Booker, D. J. and Woods, R. A.: Comparing and combining physically-based and
empirically-based approaches for estimating the hydrology of ungauged
catchments, J. Hydrol., 508, 227–239,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.007, 2014. a
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001. a
Brown, L. J., Dravid, P. N., Hudson, N. A., and Taylor, C. B.: Sustainable
groundwater resources, Heretaunga Plains, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand,
Hydrogeol. J., 7, 440–453, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050217, 1999. a
Burden, R. J.: Chemical zonation in groundwater of the Central Plains,
Canterbury, J. Hydrol., 23, 100–119, 1984. a
Callo, J. A. R.: Estimating specific leakage rates to alluvial gravel aquifers
using remote sensing data with a water balance – based approach in the
Omaka and Taylor ephemeral rivers, New Zealand, Master thesis, Technische
Universität Dresden, 2022. a
Coluccio, K. and Morgan, L. K.: A review of methods for measuring groundwater–surface water exchange in braided rivers, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4397–4417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4397-2019, 2019. a
Cook, P. G.: Quantifying river gain and loss at regional scales, J. Hydrol., 531, 749–758,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.052, 2015. a, b
Datry, T., Larned, S., and Scarsbrook, M. R.: Responses of hyporheic
invertebrate assemblages to large-scale variation in flow permanence and
surface–subsurface exchange, Freshwater Biol., 52, 1452–1462,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01775.x, 2007. a
Datry, T., Larned, S. T., and Tockner, K.: Intermittent Rivers: A Challenge
for Freshwater Ecology, BioScience, 64, 229–235,
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bit027, 2014. a
Desai, S. and Ouarda, T. B. M. J.: Regional hydrological frequency analysis at
ungauged sites with random forest regression, J. Hydrol., 594,
125861, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125861, 2021. a
Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A.: Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 913–921, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-913-2009, 2009. a
Di Ciacca, A., Leterme, B., Laloy, E., Jacques, D., and Vanderborght, J.:
Scale-dependent parameterization of groundwater–surface water interactions
in a regional hydrogeological model, J. Hydrol., 576, 494–507, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.072, 2019. a
Dravid, P. N. and Brown, L. J.: Heretaunga Plains groundwater study, Hawke's
Bay Regional Council, https://www.hbrc.govt.nz/assets/Document-Library/Projects/TANK/TANK-Key-Reports/Heretaunga-Plains-Groundwater-Study-1997.pdf (last access: August 2022), 1997. a
Fatichi, S., Vivoni, E. R., Ogden, F. L., Ivanov, V. Y., Mirus, B., Gochis, D.,
Downer, C. W., Camporese, M., Davison, J. H., and Ebel, B.: An overview of
current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed
process-based models in hydrology, J. Hydrol., 537, 45–60, 2016. a
Feyisa, G. L., Meilby, H., Fensholt, R., and Proud, S. R.: Automated Water
Extraction Index: A new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat
imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 23–35,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029, 2014. a
Fleckenstein, J. H., Krause, S., Hannah, D. M., and Boano, F.:
Groundwater-surface water interactions: New methods and models to improve
understanding of processes and dynamics, Adv. Water Resour., 33,
1291–1295, 2010. a
Fovet, O., Belemtougri, A., Boithias, L., Braud, I., Charlier, J.-B., Cottet,
M., Daudin, K., Dramais, G., Ducharne, A., Folton, N., Grippa, M., Hector,
B., Kuppel, S., Le Coz, J., Legal, L., Martin, P., Moatar, F.,
Molénat, J., Probst, A., Riotte, J., Vidal, J.-P., Vinatier, F., and
Datry, T.: Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Perspectives for
critical zone science and research on socio-ecosystems, WIREs Water, 8,
e1523, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1523, 2021. a
González-Pinzón, R., Ward, A. S., Hatch, C. E., Wlostowski, A. N.,
Singha, K., Gooseff, M. N., Haggerty, R., Harvey, J. W., Cirpka, O. A., and
Brock, J. T.: A field comparison of multiple techniques to quantify
groundwater–surface-water interactions, Freshw. Sci., 34, 139–160,
https://doi.org/10.1086/679738, 2015. a
Harbaugh, A. W.: MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water
model – the Ground-Water Flow Process. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and
Methods 6-A16, Tech. rep., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A16, 2005. a
Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G.: MODFLOW-2000,
the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model user guide to
modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process, Tech. rep.,
Denver, CO, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr200092, 2000. a
Hatch, C. E., Fisher, A. T., Revenaugh, J. S., Constantz, J., and Ruehl, C.:
Quantifying surface water–groundwater interactions using time series
analysis of streambed thermal records: Method development, Water Resour. Res., 42, W10410, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004787, 2006. a
Hoehn, E. and Von Gunten, H. R.: Radon in groundwater: A tool to assess
infiltration from surface waters to aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 25,
1795–1803, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i008p01795, 1989. a
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R.: An introduction to
statistical learning, vol. 112, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4614-7138-7, 2013. a
Jarihani, A. A., Larsen, J. R., Callow, J. N., McVicar, T. R., and Johansen,
K.: Where does all the water go? Partitioning water transmission losses in a
data-sparse, multi-channel and low-gradient dryland river system using
modelling and remote sensing, J. Hydrol., 529, 1511–1529,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2015.08.030, 2015. a
Kalbus, E., Reinstorf, F., and Schirmer, M.: Measuring methods for groundwater – surface water interactions: a review, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 873–887, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-873-2006, 2006. a
Knoll, L., Breuer, L., and Bach, M.: Large scale prediction of groundwater
nitrate concentrations from spatial data using machine learning, Sci. Total Environ., 668, 1317–1327, 2019. a
Koch, J., Stisen, S., Refsgaard, J. C., Ernstsen, V., Jakobsen, P. R., and
Højberg, A. L.: Modeling depth of the redox interface at high resolution
at national scale using random forest and residual gaussian simulation,
Water Resour. Res., 55, 1451–1469, 2019. a
Kuffour, B. N. O., Engdahl, N. B., Woodward, C. S., Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., and Maxwell, R. M.: Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1373–1397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020, 2020. a
Kuhn, M. and Wickham, H.: Tidymodels: a collection of packages for modeling
and machine learning using tidyverse principles.,
https://www.tidymodels.org (last access: August 2022), 2020. a
Lange, J.: Dynamics of transmission losses in a large arid stream channel,
J. Hydrol., 306, 112–126,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.016, 2005. a
Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J. D., Banta, E. R., Niswonger, R. G., Panday, S., and
Provost, A. M.: Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 groundwater flow model,
Tech. rep., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A55, 2017. a
Larned, S. T., Datry, T., and Robinson, C. T.: Invertebrate and microbial
responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: effects
of preceding dry periods, Aquatic Sci., 69, 554–567,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-007-0930-1, 2007. a
Larned, S. T., Arscott, D. B., Schmidt, J., and Diettrich, J. C.: A Framework
for Analyzing Longitudinal and Temporal Variation in River Flow and
Developing Flow-Ecology Relationships1,
J. Am. Water Resour. As., 46, 541–553,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00433.x, 2010. a, b
Larned, S. T., Schmidt, J., Datry, T., Konrad, C. P., Dumas, J. K., and
Diettrich, J. C.: Longitudinal river ecohydrology: flow variation down the
lengths of alluvial rivers, Ecohydrology, 4, 532–548,
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.126, 2011. a, b, c
Le Lay, H., Thomas, Z., Rouault, F., Pichelin, P., and Moatar, F.:
Characterization of Diffuse Groundwater Inflows into Stream Water (Part II:
Quantifying Groundwater Inflows by Coupling FO-DTS and Vertical Flow
Velocities), Water, 11, 2430, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122430, 2019. a
Lee, D. R.: A device for measuring seepage flux in lakes and estuaries,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 22, 140–147,
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0140, 1977. a
Lee, D. R. and Cherry, J. A.: A Field Exercise on Groundwater Flow Using
Seepage Meters and Mini-piezometers, J. Geol. Educ., 27,
6–10, https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-27.1.6, 1979. a
Lewandowski, J., Meinikmann, K., and Krause, S.: Groundwater-surface water
interactions: Recent advances and interdisciplinary challenges, Water, 12, 296, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010296, 2020. a
Massmann, G., Sültenfuß, J., and Pekdeger, A.: Analysis of long-term
dispersion in a river-recharged aquifer using tritium/helium data, Water
Resour. Res., 45, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006746, 2009. a
Maxar Team: Maxar – Archive search and discovery,
https://discover.content.maxar.com/, last access: August 2022. a
Maxwell, R. M., Kollet, S. J., Smith, S. G., Woodward, C. S., Falgout, R. D.,
Ferguson, I. M., Baldwin, C., Bosl, W. J., Hornung, R., and Ashby, S.:
ParFlow user's manual, International Ground Water Modeling Center Report
GWMI, 1, 129, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=39b05cb173b8cea706fa7179c9ce745ff5e319e3 (last access: August 2022), 2009. a
McDonald, A. K., Sheng, Z., Hart, C. R., and Wilcox, B. P.: Studies of a
regulated dryland river: surface–groundwater interactions, Hydrol.
Process., 27, 1819–1828, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9340, 2013. a
McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W.: A modular three-dimensional
finite-difference ground-water flow model, vol. 6, US Geological Survey
Reston, VA, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr83875, 1988. a
McKerchar, A. I. and Schmidt, J.: Decreases in low flows in the lower Selwyn
River?, J. Hydrol., 46, 63–72, 2007. a
McMahon, T. A. and Nathan, R. J.: Baseflow and transmission loss: A review,
WIREs Water, 8, 8:e1527, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1527, 2021. a, b, c
McMahon, T. A. and Peel, M. C.: Uncertainty in stage–discharge rating
curves: application to Australian Hydrologic Reference Stations data,
Hydrolog. Sci. J., 64, 255–275,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1577555, 2019. a
McMillan, H., Krueger, T., and Freer, J.: Benchmarking observational
uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality,
Hydrol. Process., 26, 4078–4111,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9384, 2012. a
Morel-Seytoux, H. J., Miller, C. D., Mehl, S., and Miracapillo, C.: Achilles'
heel of integrated hydrologic models: The stream-aquifer flow exchange, and
proposed alternative, J. Hydrol., 564, 900–908,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.010, 2018. a
Munasinghe, D., Cohen, S., Huang, Y.-F., Tsang, Y.-P., Zhang, J., and Fang, Z.:
Intercomparison of Satellite Remote Sensing-Based Flood Inundation Mapping
Techniques, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 54,
834–846, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12626, 2018. a
NIWA: Annual climate summary 2020, Tech. rep.,
https://niwa.co.nz/sites/niwa.co.nz/files/2020_Annual_Climate_Summary_Final.pdf (last access: August 2022),
2020. a
NIWA: Annual climate summary 2021,
https://niwa.co.nz/sites/niwa.co.nz/files/2021_Annual_Climate_Summary_NIWA11Jan2022.pdf (last access: August 2022),
2021. a
Papacharalampous, G. A. and Tyralis, H.: Evaluation of random forests and Prophet for daily streamflow forecasting, Adv. Geosci., 45, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-201-2018, 2018. a
Popp, A. L., Pardo-Álvarez, Á., Schilling, O. S., Scheidegger, A.,
Musy, S., Peel, M., Brunner, P., Purtschert, R., Hunkeler, D., and Kipfer,
R.: A Framework for Untangling Transient Groundwater Mixing and Travel
Times, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028362,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028362, 2021. a
Prickett, T. A. and Lonnquist, C. G.: Selected digital computer techniques for
groundwater resource evaluation, Tech. rep., https://www.isws.illinois.edu/pubdoc/B/ISWSB-55.pdf (last access: August 2022), 1971. a
Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Mendes, M. P., Garcia-Soldado, M. J., Chica-Olmo, M.,
and Ribeiro, L.: Predictive modeling of groundwater nitrate pollution using
Random Forest and multisource variables related to intrinsic and specific
vulnerability: A case study in an agricultural setting (Southern Spain),
Sci. Total Environ., 476, 189–206, 2014. a
Rosen, M. R. and White, P. A.: Groundwaters of New Zealand., New Zealand
Hydrological Society, ISBN 13 978-0-473-07816-4, 2001. a
Rosenberry, D. O., Duque, C., and Lee, D. R.: History and evolution of seepage
meters for quantifying flow between groundwater and surface water: Part
1–Freshwater settings, Earth-Sci. Rev., 204, 103167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103167, 2020. a
Rushton, K.: Representation in regional models of saturated river–aquifer
interaction for gaining/losing rivers, J. Hydrol., 334, 262–281,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.008, 2007. a
Rushton, K. R. and Tomlinson, L. M.: Possible mechanisms for leakage between
aquifers and rivers, J. Hydrol., 40, 49–65, 1979. a
Sagin, J., Sizo, A., Wheater, H., Jardine, T. D., and Lindenschmidt, K.-E.: A
water coverage extraction approach to track inundation in the Saskatchewan
River Delta, Canada, Int. J. Remote Sens., 36, 764–781,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.1001084, 2015. a
Schaper, J. L., Zarfl, C., Meinikmann, K., Banks, E. W., Baron, S., Cirpka,
O. A., and Lewandowski, J.: Spatial Variability of Radon Production Rates in
an Alluvial Aquifer Affects Travel Time Estimates of Groundwater Originating
From a Losing Stream, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030635,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030635, 2022. a
Shanafield, M. and Cook, P. G.: Transmission losses, infiltration and
groundwater recharge through ephemeral and intermittent streambeds: A review
of applied methods, J. Hydrol., 511, 518–529,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.068, 2014. a, b
Shanafield, M., Bourke, S. A., Zimmer, M. A., and Costigan, K. H.: An overview
of the hydrology of non-perennial rivers and streams, WIREs Water, 8, e1504,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1504, 2021. a
Shen, C., Chen, X., and Laloy, E.: Editorial: Broadening the Use of Machine
Learning in Hydrology, Front. Water, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.681023, 2021. a, b
Smith, W. and Montgomery, H.: Revolution or evolution? New Zealand agriculture
since 1984, GeoJ., 59, 107–118,
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000019969.38496.82, 2004. a
Solomatine, D. P. and Ostfeld, A.: Data-driven modelling: some past
experiences and new approaches, J. Hydroinform., 10, 3–22,
https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2008.015, 2008. a, b
Taylor, C. B., Wilson, D. D., Brown, L. J., Stewart, M. K., Burden, R. J., and
Brailsford, G. W.: Sources and flow of north Canterbury plains groundwater,
New Zealand, J. Hydrol., 106, 311–340,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90078-4, 1989. a, b
Therrien, R., McLaren, R. G., Sudicky, E. A., and Panday, S. M.: HydroGeoSphere: A three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport. Groundwater Simulations Group, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, 830, 2010. a
Tran, H., Leonarduzzi, E., Fuente, L., Hull, R., Bansal, V., Chennault, C.,
Gentine, P., Melchior, P., Condon, L., and Maxwell, R.: Development of a
Deep Learning Emulator for a Distributed Groundwater–Surface Water Model:
ParFlow-ML, Water, 13, 3393, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233393, 2021. a
Tyralis, H., Papacharalampous, G., and Langousis, A.: A Brief Review of Random
Forests for Water Scientists and Practitioners and Their Recent History in
Water Resources, Water, 11, 910, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050910, 2019. a
Villeneuve, S., Cook, P. G., Shanafield, M., Wood, C., and White, N.:
Groundwater recharge via infiltration through an ephemeral riverbed, central
Australia, J. Arid. Environ., 117, 47–58,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.009, 2015. a
Vincent, C. N.: Hydrogeology of the Upper Selwyn Catchment, Master thesis, https://doi.org/10.26021/2353, 2005. a, b
Walters, M. O.: Transmission Losses in Arid Region,
J. Hydraul. Eng., 116, 129–138, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(129),
1990. a
Wang, P., Pozdniakov, S. P., and Vasilevskiy, P. Y.: Estimating
groundwater-ephemeral stream exchange in hyper-arid environments: Field
experiments and numerical simulations, J. Hydrol., 555, 68–79,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.004, 2017. a
Wheater, H. S., Mathias, S. A., and Li, X.: Groundwater modelling in arid and
semi-arid areas, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760280, 2010. a
White, P. A.: Avon River springs catchment, Christchurch City, New Zealand,
Aust. J. Earth Sci., 56, 61–70,
https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090802542075, 2009.
a
White, P. A., Kovacova, E., Zemansky, G., Jebbour, N., and Moreau-Fournier, M.:
Groundwater-surface water interaction in the Waimakariri River, New Zealand,
and groundwater outflow from the river bed, J. Hydrol., 51, 1–23,
2012. a
Wilson, D. D.: The significance of geology in some current water resource
problems, Canterbury Plains, New Zealand, J. Hydrol., 12, 103–118,
1973. a
Wilson, S. R., Close, M. E., Abraham, P., Sarris, T. S., Banasiak, L., Stenger,
R., and Hadfield, J.: Achieving unbiased predictions of national-scale
groundwater redox conditions via data oversampling and statistical learning,
Sci. Total Environ., 705, 135877,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135877, 2020. a
Wöhling, T., Gosses, M. J., Wilson, S. R., and Davidson, P.: Quantifying
River‐Groundwater Interactions of New Zealand's Gravel‐Bed Rivers: The
Wairau Plain, Groundwater, 56, 647–666, 2018. a
Wöhling, T., Wilson, S., Wadsworth, V., and Davidson, P.: Detecting the
cause of change using uncertain data: Natural and anthropogenic factors
contributing to declining groundwater levels and flows of the Wairau Plain
aquifer, New Zealand, J. Hydrol., 31, 100715,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100715, 2020. a
Wright, M. N. and Ziegler, A.: ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests
for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R, J. Stat. Softw., 77,
1–17, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i01, 2017. a, b
Short summary
We present a novel framework to estimate how much water is lost by ephemeral rivers using satellite imagery and machine learning. This framework proved to be an efficient approach, requiring less fieldwork and generating more data than traditional methods, at a similar accuracy. Furthermore, applying this framework improved our understanding of the water transfer at our study site. Our framework is easily transferable to other ephemeral rivers and could be applied to long time series.
We present a novel framework to estimate how much water is lost by ephemeral rivers using...
