Articles | Volume 27, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3565-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3565-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A Bayesian model for quantifying errors in citizen science data: application to rainfall observations from Nepal
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 701 S Nedderman Dr., Arlington, TX 76019, USA
Gerrit Schoups
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, Delft, 2628 CD, the Netherlands
Jeffrey C. Davids
College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico, 400 W 1st St, Chico, CA 95929, USA
Davids Engineering, 1095 Nelson Street, Chico, CA 95928, USA
Nick van de Giesen
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, Delft, 2628 CD, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Magali Ponds, Sarah Hanus, Harry Zekollari, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Gerrit Schoups, Roland Kaitna, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3545–3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines how future climate changes impact root zone storage, a key hydrological model parameter. Root zone storage – the soil water accessible to plants – adapts to climate but is often kept constant in models. We estimated climate-adapted storage in six Austrian Alps catchments. While storage increased, streamflow projections showed minimal change, which suggests that dynamic root zone representation is less critical in humid regions but warrants further study in arid areas.
Roya Mourad, Gerrit Schoups, Vinnarasi Rajendran, and Wim Bastiaanssen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3047, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3047, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Water balance data are affected by various errors (bias and noise). To reduce these errors, this study presents a water balance data fusion approach that combines multi-scale data (from satellites and in-situ sensors) for each water balance variable and jointly calibrates them, resulting in consistent, bias-corrected and noise-filtered, water balance estimates, along with uncertainty bands. These estimates are useful for constraining process-based models and informing water management decisions.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Jannis M. Hoch, Gemma Coxon, Nick C. van de Giesen, and Rolf W. Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5011–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For users of hydrological models, model suitability often hinges on how well simulated outputs match observed discharge. This study highlights the importance of including discharge observation uncertainty in hydrological model performance assessment. We highlight the need to account for this uncertainty in model comparisons and introduce a practical method suitable for any observational time series with available uncertainty estimates.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Henry M. Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa E. Banda, Petra Hulsman, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku A. Nyambe, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3633–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The fall and flushing of new leaves in the miombo woodlands co-occur in the dry season before the commencement of seasonal rainfall. The miombo species are also said to have access to soil moisture in deep soils, including groundwater in the dry season. Satellite-based evaporation estimates, temporal trends, and magnitudes differ the most in the dry season, most likely due to inadequate understanding and representation of the highlighted miombo species attributes in simulations.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Henry Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa Banda, Bart Schilperoort, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku Nyambe, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1695–1722, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1695-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1695-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Miombo woodland plants continue to lose water even during the driest part of the year. This appears to be facilitated by the adapted features such as deep rooting (beyond 5 m) with access to deep soil moisture, potentially even ground water. It appears the trend and amount of water that the plants lose is correlated more to the available energy. This loss of water in the dry season by miombo woodland plants appears to be incorrectly captured by satellite-based evaporation estimates.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Rolf W. Hut, Nick C. van de Giesen, Niels Drost, Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, and Pieter Hazenberg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4407–4430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years gridded hydrological modelling moved into the realm of hyper-resolution modelling (<10 km). In this study, we investigate the effect of varying grid-cell sizes for the wflow_sbm hydrological model. We used a large sample of basins from the CAMELS data set to test the effect that varying grid-cell sizes has on the simulation of streamflow at the basin outlet. Results show that there is no single best grid-cell size for modelling streamflow throughout the domain.
Rolf Hut, Niels Drost, Nick van de Giesen, Ben van Werkhoven, Banafsheh Abdollahi, Jerom Aerts, Thomas Albers, Fakhereh Alidoost, Bouwe Andela, Jaro Camphuijsen, Yifat Dzigan, Ronald van Haren, Eric Hutton, Peter Kalverla, Maarten van Meersbergen, Gijs van den Oord, Inti Pelupessy, Stef Smeets, Stefan Verhoeven, Martine de Vos, and Berend Weel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5371–5390, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
With the eWaterCycle platform, we are providing the hydrological community with a platform to conduct their research that is fully compatible with the principles of both open science and FAIR science. The eWatercyle platform gives easy access to well-known hydrological models, big datasets and example experiments. Using eWaterCycle hydrologists can easily compare the results from different models, couple models and do more complex hydrological computational research.
Henry Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa Banda, Petra Hulsman, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku Nyambe, and Hubert Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-114, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
We compare performance of evaporation models in the Luangwa Basin located in a semi-arid and complex Miombo ecosystem in Africa. Miombo plants changes colour, drop off leaves and acquire new leaves during the dry season. In addition, the plant roots go deep in the soil and appear to access groundwater. Results show that evaporation models with structure and process that do not capture this unique plant structure and behaviour appears to have difficulties to correctly estimating evaporation.
Paul C. Vermunt, Susan C. Steele-Dunne, Saeed Khabbazan, Jasmeet Judge, and Nick C. van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1223–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the use of hydrometeorological sensors to reconstruct variations in internal vegetation water content of corn and relates these variations to the sub-daily behaviour of polarimetric L-band backscatter. The results show significant sensitivity of backscatter to the daily cycles of vegetation water content and dew, particularly on dry days and for vertical and cross-polarizations, which demonstrates the potential for using radar for studies on vegetation water dynamics.
Punpim Puttaraksa Mapiam, Monton Methaprayun, Thom Bogaard, Gerrit Schoups, and Marie-Claire Ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 775–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-775-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-775-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The density of rain gauge networks plays an important role in radar rainfall bias correction. In this work, we aimed to assess the extent to which daily rainfall observations from a dense network of citizen scientists improve the accuracy of hourly radar rainfall estimates in the Tubma Basin, Thailand. Results show that citizen rain gauges significantly enhance the performance of radar rainfall bias adjustment up to a range of about 40 km from the center of the citizen rain gauge network.
Wouter Dorigo, Irene Himmelbauer, Daniel Aberer, Lukas Schremmer, Ivana Petrakovic, Luca Zappa, Wolfgang Preimesberger, Angelika Xaver, Frank Annor, Jonas Ardö, Dennis Baldocchi, Marco Bitelli, Günter Blöschl, Heye Bogena, Luca Brocca, Jean-Christophe Calvet, J. Julio Camarero, Giorgio Capello, Minha Choi, Michael C. Cosh, Nick van de Giesen, Istvan Hajdu, Jaakko Ikonen, Karsten H. Jensen, Kasturi Devi Kanniah, Ileen de Kat, Gottfried Kirchengast, Pankaj Kumar Rai, Jenni Kyrouac, Kristine Larson, Suxia Liu, Alexander Loew, Mahta Moghaddam, José Martínez Fernández, Cristian Mattar Bader, Renato Morbidelli, Jan P. Musial, Elise Osenga, Michael A. Palecki, Thierry Pellarin, George P. Petropoulos, Isabella Pfeil, Jarrett Powers, Alan Robock, Christoph Rüdiger, Udo Rummel, Michael Strobel, Zhongbo Su, Ryan Sullivan, Torbern Tagesson, Andrej Varlagin, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Jeffrey Walker, Jun Wen, Fred Wenger, Jean Pierre Wigneron, Mel Woods, Kun Yang, Yijian Zeng, Xiang Zhang, Marek Zreda, Stephan Dietrich, Alexander Gruber, Peter van Oevelen, Wolfgang Wagner, Klaus Scipal, Matthias Drusch, and Roberto Sabia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5749–5804, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5749-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5749-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) is a community-based open-access data portal for soil water measurements taken at the ground and is accessible at https://ismn.earth. Over 1000 scientific publications and thousands of users have made use of the ISMN. The scope of this paper is to inform readers about the data and functionality of the ISMN and to provide a review of the scientific progress facilitated through the ISMN with the scope to shape future research and operations.
Didier de Villiers, Marc Schleiss, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Rolf Hut, and Nick van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5607–5623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based rainfall observations across the African continent are sparse. We present a new and inexpensive rainfall measuring instrument (the intervalometer) and use it to derive reasonably accurate rainfall rates. These are dependent on a fundamental assumption that is widely used in parameterisations of the rain drop size distribution. This assumption is tested and found to not apply for most raindrops but is still useful in deriving rainfall rates. The intervalometer shows good potential.
Sarah Hanus, Markus Hrachowitz, Harry Zekollari, Gerrit Schoups, Miren Vizcaino, and Roland Kaitna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3429–3453, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the effects of climate change on runoff patterns in six Alpine catchments in Austria at the end of the 21st century. Our results indicate a substantial shift to earlier occurrences in annual maximum and minimum flows in high-elevation catchments. Magnitudes of annual extremes are projected to increase under a moderate emission scenario in all catchments. Changes are generally more pronounced for high-elevation catchments.
Cody C. Routson, Darrell S. Kaufman, Nicholas P. McKay, Michael P. Erb, Stéphanie H. Arcusa, Kendrick J. Brown, Matthew E. Kirby, Jeremiah P. Marsicek, R. Scott Anderson, Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno, Jessica R. Rodysill, Matthew S. Lachniet, Sherilyn C. Fritz, Joseph R. Bennett, Michelle F. Goman, Sarah E. Metcalfe, Jennifer M. Galloway, Gerrit Schoups, David B. Wahl, Jesse L. Morris, Francisca Staines-Urías, Andria Dawson, Bryan N. Shuman, Daniel G. Gavin, Jeffrey S. Munroe, and Brian F. Cumming
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1613–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1613-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1613-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a curated database of western North American Holocene paleoclimate records, which have been screened on length, resolution, and geochronology. The database gathers paleoclimate time series that reflect temperature, hydroclimate, or circulation features from terrestrial and marine sites, spanning a region from Mexico to Alaska. This publicly accessible collection will facilitate a broad range of paleoclimate inquiry.
Moctar Dembélé, Bettina Schaefli, Nick van de Giesen, and Grégoire Mariéthoz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5379–5406, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5379-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5379-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates 102 combinations of rainfall and temperature datasets from satellite and reanalysis sources as input to a fully distributed hydrological model. The model is recalibrated for each input dataset, and the outputs are evaluated with streamflow, evaporation, soil moisture and terrestrial water storage data. Results show that no single rainfall or temperature dataset consistently ranks first in reproducing the spatio-temporal variability of all hydrological processes.
Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Bart Schilperoort, Bas J. H. van de Wiel, Jonathan G. Izett, John S. Selker, Chad W. Higgins, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Nick C. van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5423–5439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5423-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5423-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we present experimental results of a novel actively heated fiber-optic (AHFO) observational wind-probing technique. We utilized a controlled wind-tunnel setup to assess both the accuracy and precision of AHFO under a range of operational conditions (wind speed, angles of attack and temperature differences). AHFO has the potential to provide high-resolution distributed observations of wind speeds, allowing for better spatial characterization of fine-scale processes.
Cited articles
Atkinson, G. M. and Wald, D. J.: “Did You Feel It?” intensity data: A
surprisingly good measure of earthquake ground motion, Seismol. Res.
Lett., 78, 362–368, 2007. a
Bird, T. J., Bates, A. E., Lefcheck, J. S., Hill, N. A., Thomson, R. J., Edgar,
G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Wotherspoon, S., Krkosek, M., Stuart-Smith,
J. F., Pecl, G. T., Barrett, N., and Frusher, S.: Statistical solutions for
error and bias in global citizen science datasets, Biol. Conserv.,
173, 144–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037, 2014. a, b, c, d
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg,
K. V., and Shirk, J.: Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for
Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy, BioScience,
59, 977–984, https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9, 2009. a
Bonter, D. N. and Cooper, C. B.: Data validation in citizen science: a case
study from Project FeederWatch, Front. Ecol. Environ.,
10, 305–307, https://doi.org/10.1890/110273, 2012. a
Brunsdon, C. and Comber, L.: Assessing the changing flowering date of the
common lilac in North America: a random coefficient model approach,
Geoinformatica, 16, 675–690, 2012. a
Budde, M., Schankin, A., Hoffmann, J., Danz, M., Riedel, T., and Beigl, M.:
Participatory Sensing or Participatory Nonsense?: Mitigating the
Effect of Human Error on Data Quality in Citizen Science,
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous
Technologies, 1, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1145/3131900, 2017. a
Butt, N., Slade, E., Thompson, J., Malhi, Y., and Riutta, T.: Quantifying the
sampling error in tree census measurements by volunteers and its effect on
carbon stock estimates, Ecol. Appl., 23, 936–943, 2013. a
Central Bureau of Statistics: National Population and Housing Census 2011: National report, vol. 1, Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission Secretariat, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/census/documents/Nepal/Nepal-Census-2011-Vol1.pdf (last access: 2 October 2023), 2012. a
Cox, T., Philippoff, J., Baumgartner, E., and Smith, C.: Expert variability
provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven
intertidal monitoring program, Ecol. Appl., 22, 1201–1212, 2012. a
Crall, A. W., Newman, G. J., Stohlgren, T. J., Holfelder, K. A., Graham, J.,
and Waller, D. M.: Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive
species case study: Assessing citizen science data quality, Conserv.
Lett., 4, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x, 2011. a, b, c, d
Davids, J. C., Devkota, N., Pandey, A., Prajapati, R., Ertis, B. A., Rutten,
M. M., Lyon, S. W., Bogaard, T. A., and van de Giesen, N.: Soda Bottle
Science–Citizen Science Monsoon Precipitation Monitoring in
Nepal, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 46, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00046,
2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p
Delaney, D. G., Sperling, C. D., Adams, C. S., and Leung, B.: Marine invasive
species: validation of citizen science and implications for national
monitoring networks, Biol. Invasions, 10, 117–128,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0, 2008. a, b, c, d
de Solla, S. R., Shirose, L. J., Fernie, K. J., Barrett, G. C., Brousseau,
C. S., and Bishop, C. A.: Effect of sampling effort and species detectability
on volunteer based anuran monitoring programs, Biol. Conserv., 121,
585–594, 2005. a
Eisma, J. A. and Schoups, G.: jaeisma08/CSNepal: Citizen Science Error Model, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8404002, 2023. a
Fink, D., Hochachka, W. M., Zuckerberg, B., Winkler, D. W., Shaby, B., Munson,
M. A., Hooker, G., Riedewald, M., Sheldon, D., and Kelling, S.:
Spatiotemporal exploratory models for broad-scale survey data, Ecol.
Appl., 20, 2131–2147, 2010. a
Habib, E., Krajewski, W. F., and Ciach, G. J.: Estimation of rainfall
interstation correlation, J. Hydrometeorol., 2, 621–629,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0621:EORIC>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Hunter, J., Alabri, A., and van Ingen, C.: Assessing the quality and
trustworthiness of citizen science data, Concurr. Comp.-Pract. E., 25, 454–466, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.2923, 2013. a, b
Kidd, C., Becker, A., Huffman, G. J., Muller, C. L., Joe, P.,
Skofronick-Jackson, G., and Kirschbaum, D. B.: So, How Much of the
Earth’s Surface Is Covered by Rain Gauges?, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 69–78,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00283.1, 2017. a
Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., and Simmons, B.: Assessing data quality
in citizen science, Front. Ecol. Environ., 14, 551–560,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436, 2016. a, b
Krapu, C. and Borsuk, M.: Probabilistic programming: A review for environmental
modellers, Environ. Modell. Softw., 114, 40–48, 2019. a
MacKay, D. J. C.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 10 0521642981, ISBN 13 978-0521642989, 2003. a
Miller, D. A., Nichols, J. D., McClintock, B. T., Grant, E. H. C., Bailey,
L. L., and Weir, L. A.: Improving occupancy estimation when two types of
observational error occur: Non-detection and species misidentification,
Ecology, 92, 1422–1428, 2011. a
Minka, T.: Bayesian linear regression, Tech. rep., Citeseer, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=929adb1693090be52b328dc0a36f81d35de65ee1
(last access: 30 May 2021), 2000. a
Minka, T.: Divergence measures and message passing, Technical Report
TR-2005-173, Microsoft Research, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=fb361fc576e1c70231126e6bbb7eedfb8a7b68f6
(last access: 22 October 2020), 2005. a
Minka, T.: Expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian inference, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.2294, 2013. a, b
Nayava, J. L.: Heavy monsoon rainfall in Nepal, Weather, 29, 443–450,
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1974.tb03299.x, 1974. a, b
Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., and Crowston, K.:
The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms,
Front. Ecol. Environ., 10, 298–304, https://doi.org/10.1890/110294,
2012. a
Nishihara, R., Minka, T., and Tarlow, D.: Detecting parameter symmetries in
probabilistic models, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.5386, 2013. a
Paul, J. D., Buytaert, W., Allen, S., Ballesteros-Cánovas, J. A., Bhusal, J., Cieslik, K., Clark, J., Dugar, S., Hannah, D. M. Stoffel, M., Dewulf, A., Dhital, M. R., Liu, W., Nayaval, J. L., Neupane, B., Schiller, A., Smith, P. J., and Supper, R.:
Citizen science for hydrological risk reduction and resilience building,
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5, e1262, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1262, 2018. a
Paul, J. D., Cieslik, K., Sah, N., Shakya, P., Parajuli, B. P., Paudel, S.,
Dewulf, A., and Buytaert, W.: Applying Citizen Science for Sustainable
Development: Rainfall Monitoring in Western Nepal, Frontiers in Water, 2, 62, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2020.581375,
2020. a, b
Riesch, H. and Potter, C.: Citizen science as seen by scientists:
Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions, Public
Underst. Sci., 23, 107–120, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513497324, 2014. a
Schoups, G. and Nasseri, M.: GRACEfully closing the water balance: A
data-driven probabilistic approach applied to river basins in Iran, Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029071, 2021. a
Seibert, J., Strobl, B., Etter, S., Hummer, P., and van Meerveld, H.: Virtual
staff gauges for crowd-based stream level observations, Front. Earth
Sci., 7, 70, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00070, 2019.
a, b
Sheppard, S. A. and Terveen, L.: Quality is a verb: the operationalization of
data quality in a citizen science community, in: Proceedings of the 7th
International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration – WikiSym '11, ACM Press, Mountain View, California, 3–5 October 2011, p. 29,
https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038565, 2011. a, b
Stampoulis, D. and Anagnostou, E. N.: Evaluation of global satellite rainfall
products over continental Europe, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 588–603,
2012. a
Strobl, B., Etter, S., van Meerveld, I., and Seibert, J.: The CrowdWater game:
A playful way to improve the accuracy of crowdsourced water level class data,
PLoS One, 14, e0222579, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222579, 2019. a
Thapa, B. R., Ishidaira, H., Pandey, V. P., and Shakya, N. M.: A multi-model
approach for analyzing water balance dynamics in Kathmandu Valley,
Nepal, J. Hydrol.-Regional Studies, 9, 149–162,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.12.080, 2017. a
Tipaldo, G. and Allamano, P.: Citizen science and community-based rain
monitoring initiatives: an interdisciplinary approach across sociology and
water science, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4, e1200, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1200, 2017. a
USAID Nepal: Nepal Total Annual Rainfall Distribution,
https://data.humdata.org/dataset/nepal-historical-annual-and-monthly-rainfall-distribution-for-monsoon-months
(last access: 15 April 2020), 2015. a
Venanzi, M., Guiver, J., Kazai, G., Kohli, P., and Shokouhi, M.:
Community-based bayesian aggregation models for crowdsourcing, in:
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web – WWW
'14, ACM Press, Seoul, Korea, 7–11 April 2014, 155–164, https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2567989,
2014. a, b, c, d, e
Wiggins, A., Newman, G., Stevenson, R. D., and Crowston, K.: Mechanisms for
Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science, in: 2011 IEEE
Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops,
IEEE, Stockholm, Sweden, 5—8 December 2011, 14–19, https://doi.org/10.1109/eScienceW.2011.27, 2011. a
Short summary
Citizen scientists often submit high-quality data, but a robust method for assessing data quality is needed. This study develops a semi-automated program that characterizes the mistakes made by citizen scientists by grouping them into communities of citizen scientists with similar mistake tendencies and flags potentially erroneous data for further review. This work may help citizen science programs assess the quality of their data and can inform training practices.
Citizen scientists often submit high-quality data, but a robust method for assessing data...