Articles | Volume 27, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2499-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2499-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note
| 
10 Jul 2023
Technical note |
| 10 Jul 2023
| 10 Jul 2023
Technical note: Statistical generation of climate-perturbed flow duration curves
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Robert Milton
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Solomon Brown
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Charles Rougé
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Related authors
No articles found.
Charles Rougé, Patrick M. Reed, Danielle S. Grogan, Shan Zuidema, Alexander Prusevich, Stanley Glidden, Jonathan R. Lamontagne, and Richard B. Lammers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1365–1388, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1365-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1365-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Amid growing interest in using large-scale hydrological models for flood and drought monitoring and forecasting, it is important to evaluate common assumptions these models make. We investigated the representation of reservoirs as separate (non-coordinated) infrastructure. We found that not appropriately representing coordination and control processes can lead a hydrological model to simulate flood and drought events that would not occur given the coordinated emergency response in the basin.
Related subject area
Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Floods and droughts: a multivariate perspective
Deep learning methods for flood mapping: a review of existing applications and future research directions
Extreme floods in Europe: going beyond observations using reforecast ensemble pooling
Hydroinformatics education – the Water Informatics in Science and Engineering (WISE) Centre for Doctoral Training
Wetropolis extreme rainfall and flood demonstrator: from mathematical design to outreach
Technical note: The beneficial role of a natural permeable layer in slope stabilization by drainage trenches
Assessing the impacts of reservoirs on downstream flood frequency by coupling the effect of scheduling-related multivariate rainfall with an indicator of reservoir effects
Observation operators for assimilation of satellite observations in fluvial inundation forecasting
Contribution of potential evaporation forecasts to 10-day streamflow forecast skill for the Rhine River
Inundation mapping based on reach-scale effective geometry
Effects of variability in probable maximum precipitation patterns on flood losses
The challenge of forecasting impacts of flash floods: test of a simplified hydraulic approach and validation based on insurance claim data
A comparison of the discrete cosine and wavelet transforms for hydrologic model input data reduction
Hydrological modeling of the Peruvian–Ecuadorian Amazon Basin using GPM-IMERG satellite-based precipitation dataset
Technical note: Design flood under hydrological uncertainty
Topography- and nightlight-based national flood risk assessment in Canada
Regime shifts in annual maximum rainfall across Australia – implications for intensity–frequency–duration (IFD) relationships
Performance evaluation of groundwater model hydrostratigraphy from airborne electromagnetic data and lithological borehole logs
A continuous rainfall model based on vine copulas
Estimates of global dew collection potential on artificial surfaces
Climate changes of hydrometeorological and hydrological extremes in the Paute basin, Ecuadorean Andes
An assessment of the ability of Bartlett–Lewis type of rainfall models to reproduce drought statistics
Modeling root reinforcement using a root-failure Weibull survival function
Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions
Application of a model-based rainfall-runoff database as efficient tool for flood risk management
Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis
HydroViz: design and evaluation of a Web-based tool for improving hydrology education
Web 2.0 collaboration tool to support student research in hydrology – an opinion
SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds – the two-CN system approach
Discharge estimation combining flow routing and occasional measurements of velocity
Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - Part 2: Application
Comment on "A praxis-oriented perspective of streamflow inference from stage observations – the method of Dottori et al. (2009) and the alternative of the Jones Formula, with the kinematic wave celerity computed on the looped rating curve" by Koussis (2009)
An evaluation of the Canadian global meteorological ensemble prediction system for short-term hydrological forecasting
Manuela Irene Brunner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2479–2497, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2479-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2479-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
I discuss different types of multivariate hydrological extremes and their dependencies, including regional extremes affecting multiple locations, such as spatially connected flood events; consecutive extremes occurring in close temporal succession, such as successive droughts; extremes characterized by multiple characteristics, such as floods with jointly high peak discharge and flood volume; and transitions between different types of extremes, such as drought-to-flood transitions.
Roberto Bentivoglio, Elvin Isufi, Sebastian Nicolaas Jonkman, and Riccardo Taormina
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4345–4378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4345-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4345-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Deep learning methods have been increasingly used in flood management to improve traditional techniques. While promising results have been obtained, our review shows significant challenges in building deep learning models that can (i) generalize across multiple scenarios, (ii) account for complex interactions, and (iii) perform probabilistic predictions. We argue that these shortcomings could be addressed by transferring recent fundamental advancements in deep learning to flood mapping.
Manuela I. Brunner and Louise J. Slater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 469–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing the rarity and magnitude of very extreme flood events occurring less than twice a century is challenging due to the lack of observations of such rare events. Here we develop a new approach, pooling reforecast ensemble members from the European Flood Awareness System to increase the sample size available to estimate the frequency of extreme flood events. We demonstrate that such ensemble pooling produces more robust estimates than observation-based estimates.
Thorsten Wagener, Dragan Savic, David Butler, Reza Ahmadian, Tom Arnot, Jonathan Dawes, Slobodan Djordjevic, Roger Falconer, Raziyeh Farmani, Debbie Ford, Jan Hofman, Zoran Kapelan, Shunqi Pan, and Ross Woods
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2721–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
How can we effectively train PhD candidates both (i) across different knowledge domains in water science and engineering and (ii) in computer science? To address this issue, the Water Informatics in Science and Engineering Centre for Doctoral Training (WISE CDT) offers a postgraduate programme that fosters enhanced levels of innovation and collaboration by training a cohort of engineers and scientists at the boundary of water informatics, science and engineering.
Onno Bokhove, Tiffany Hicks, Wout Zweers, and Thomas Kent
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2483-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2483-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Wetropolis is a
table-topdemonstration model with extreme rainfall and flooding, including random rainfall, river flow, flood plains, an upland reservoir, a porous moor, and a city which can flood. It lets the viewer experience extreme rainfall and flood events in a physical model on reduced spatial and temporal scales with an event return period of 6.06 min rather than, say, 200 years. We disseminate its mathematical design and how it has been shown most prominently to over 500 flood victims.
Gianfranco Urciuoli, Luca Comegna, Marianna Pirone, and Luciano Picarelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1669–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1669-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1669-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate, through a numerical approach, that the presence of soil layers of higher permeability, a not unlikely condition in some deep landslides in clay, may be exploited to improve the efficiency of systems of drainage trenches for slope stabilization. The problem has been examined for the case that a unique pervious layer, parallel to the ground surface, is present at an elevation higher than the bottom of the trenches.
Bin Xiong, Lihua Xiong, Jun Xia, Chong-Yu Xu, Cong Jiang, and Tao Du
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4453–4470, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4453-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4453-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new indicator of reservoir effects, called the rainfall–reservoir composite index (RRCI). RRCI, coupled with the effects of static reservoir capacity and scheduling-related multivariate rainfall, has a better performance than the previous indicator in terms of explaining the variation in the downstream floods affected by reservoir operation. A covariate-based flood frequency analysis using RRCI can provide more reliable downstream flood risk estimation.
Elizabeth S. Cooper, Sarah L. Dance, Javier García-Pintado, Nancy K. Nichols, and Polly J. Smith
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2541–2559, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2541-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2541-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Flooding from rivers is a huge and costly problem worldwide. Computer simulations can help to warn people if and when they are likely to be affected by river floodwater, but such predictions are not always accurate or reliable. Information about flood extent from satellites can help to keep these forecasts on track. Here we investigate different ways of using information from satellite images and look at the effect on computer predictions. This will help to develop flood warning systems.
Bart van Osnabrugge, Remko Uijlenhoet, and Albrecht Weerts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1453–1467, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A correct estimate of the amount of future precipitation is the most important factor in making a good streamflow forecast, but evaporation is also an important component that determines the discharge of a river. However, in this study for the Rhine River we found that evaporation forecasts only give an almost negligible improvement compared to methods that use statistical information on climatology for a 10-day streamflow forecast. This is important to guide research on low flow forecasts.
Cédric Rebolho, Vazken Andréassian, and Nicolas Le Moine
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5967–5985, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5967-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5967-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Inundation models are useful for hazard management and prevention. They are traditionally based on hydraulic partial differential equations (with satisfying results but large data and computational requirements). This study presents a simplified approach combining reach-scale geometric properties with steady uniform flow equations. The model shows promising results overall, although difficulties persist in the most complex urbanised reaches.
Andreas Paul Zischg, Guido Felder, Rolf Weingartner, Niall Quinn, Gemma Coxon, Jeffrey Neal, Jim Freer, and Paul Bates
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2759–2773, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2759-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2759-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a model experiment and distributed different rainfall patterns over a mountain river basin. For each rainfall scenario, we computed the flood losses with a model chain. The experiment shows that flood losses vary considerably within the river basin and depend on the timing of the flood peaks from the basin's sub-catchments. Basin-specific characteristics such as the location of the main settlements within the floodplains play an additional important role in determining flood losses.
Guillaume Le Bihan, Olivier Payrastre, Eric Gaume, David Moncoulon, and Frédéric Pons
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5911–5928, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5911-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5911-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper illustrates how an integrated flash flood monitoring (or forecasting) system may be designed to directly provide information on possibly flooded areas and associated impacts on a very detailed river network and over large territories. The approach is extensively tested in the regions of Alès and Draguignan, located in south-eastern France. Validation results are presented in terms of accuracy of the estimated flood extents and related impacts (based on insurance claim data).
Ashley Wright, Jeffrey P. Walker, David E. Robertson, and Valentijn R. N. Pauwels
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3827–3838, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3827-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3827-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The accurate reduction of hydrologic model input data is an impediment towards understanding input uncertainty and model structural errors. This paper compares the ability of two transforms to reduce rainfall input data. The resultant transforms are compressed to varying extents and reconstructed before being evaluated with standard simulation performance summary metrics and descriptive statistics. It is concluded the discrete wavelet transform is most capable of preserving rainfall time series.
Ricardo Zubieta, Augusto Getirana, Jhan Carlo Espinoza, Waldo Lavado-Casimiro, and Luis Aragon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3543–3555, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3543-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3543-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper indicates that precipitation data derived from GPM-IMERG correspond more closely to TMPA V7 than TMPA RT datasets, but both GPM-IMERG and TMPA V7 precipitation data tend to overestimate, in comparison to observed rainfall (by 11.1 % and 15.7 %, respectively). Statistical analysis indicates that GPM-IMERG is as useful as TMPA V7 or TMPA RT datasets for estimating observed streamflows in Andean–Amazonian regions (Ucayali Basin, southern regions of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Ecuador).
Anna Botto, Daniele Ganora, Pierluigi Claps, and Francesco Laio
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3353–3358, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3353-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3353-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper provides an easy-to-use implementation of the UNCODE framework, which allows one to estimate the design flood value by directly accounting for sample uncertainty. Other than a design tool, this methodology is also a practical way to quantify the value of data in the design process.
Amin Elshorbagy, Raja Bharath, Anchit Lakhanpal, Serena Ceola, Alberto Montanari, and Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2219–2232, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2219-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2219-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Flood mapping is one of Canada's major national interests. This work presents a simple and effective method for large-scale flood hazard and risk mapping, applied in this study to Canada. Readily available data, such as remote sensing night-light data, topography, and stream network were used to create the maps.
D. C. Verdon-Kidd and A. S. Kiem
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4735–4746, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4735-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4735-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Rainfall intensity-frequency-duration (IFD) relationships are required for the design and planning of water supply and management systems around the world. Currently IFD information is based on the "stationary climate assumption". However, this paper provides evidence of regime shifts in annual maxima rainfall time series using 96 daily rainfall stations and 66 sub-daily rainfall stations across Australia. Importantly, current IFD relationships may under- or overestimate the design rainfall.
P. A. Marker, N. Foged, X. He, A. V. Christiansen, J. C. Refsgaard, E. Auken, and P. Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3875–3890, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3875-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3875-2015, 2015
H. Vernieuwe, S. Vandenberghe, B. De Baets, and N. E. C. Verhoest
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2685–2699, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2685-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2685-2015, 2015
H. Vuollekoski, M. Vogt, V. A. Sinclair, J. Duplissy, H. Järvinen, E.-M. Kyrö, R. Makkonen, T. Petäjä, N. L. Prisle, P. Räisänen, M. Sipilä, J. Ylhäisi, and M. Kulmala
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 601–613, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-601-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-601-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The global potential for collecting usable water from dew on an
artificial collector sheet was investigated by utilising 34 years of
meteorological reanalysis data as input to a dew formation model. Continental dew formation was found to be frequent and common, but daily yields were
mostly below 0.1mm.
D. E. Mora, L. Campozano, F. Cisneros, G. Wyseure, and P. Willems
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 631–648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-631-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-631-2014, 2014
M. T. Pham, W. J. Vanhaute, S. Vandenberghe, B. De Baets, and N. E. C. Verhoest
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5167–5183, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5167-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5167-2013, 2013
M. Schwarz, F. Giadrossich, and D. Cohen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4367–4377, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4367-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4367-2013, 2013
G. Di Baldassarre, A. Viglione, G. Carr, L. Kuil, J. L. Salinas, and G. Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3295–3303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013, 2013
L. Brocca, S. Liersch, F. Melone, T. Moramarco, and M. Volk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3159–3169, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3159-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3159-2013, 2013
T. A. McMahon, M. C. Peel, L. Lowe, R. Srikanthan, and T. R. McVicar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1331–1363, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013, 2013
E. Habib, Y. Ma, D. Williams, H. O. Sharif, and F. Hossain
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3767–3781, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3767-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3767-2012, 2012
A. Pathirana, B. Gersonius, and M. Radhakrishnan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2499–2509, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2499-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2499-2012, 2012
K. X. Soulis and J. D. Valiantzas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1001–1015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012, 2012
G. Corato, T. Moramarco, and T. Tucciarelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2979–2994, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2979-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2979-2011, 2011
A. Elshorbagy, G. Corzo, S. Srinivasulu, and D. P. Solomatine
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1943–1961, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1943-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1943-2010, 2010
A. D. Koussis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1093–1097, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1093-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1093-2010, 2010
J. A. Velázquez, T. Petit, A. Lavoie, M.-A. Boucher, R. Turcotte, V. Fortin, and F. Anctil
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2221–2231, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2221-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2221-2009, 2009
Cited articles
Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., Savenije, H., and
Viglione, A.: Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: synthesis across
processes, places and scales, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235761, 2013. a
Boscarello, L., Ravazzani, G., Cislaghi, A., and Mancini, M.: Regionalization
of flow-duration curves through catchment classification with streamflow
signatures and physiographic–climate indices, J. Hydrol.
Eng., 21, 05015027, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001307, 2016. a
Brown, A. E., Western, A. W., McMahon, T. A., and Zhang, L.: Impact of forest
cover changes on annual streamflow and flow duration curves, J.
Hydrol., 483, 39–50, 2013. a
Brown, C., Ghile, Y., Laverty, M., and Li, K.: Decision scaling: Linking
bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water
sector, Water Resour. Res., 48, W09537, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011212, 2012. a, b
Bryant, B. P. and Lempert, R. J.: Thinking inside the box: A participatory,
computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 77, 34–49, 2010. a
Castellarin, A., Botter, G., Hughes, D., Liu, S., Ouarda, T., Parajka, J.,
Post, D., Sivapalan, M., Spence, C., Viglione, A., Castellarin, A., Botter, G., Hughes, D., Liu, S., Ouarda, T., Parajka, J., Post, D., Sivapalan, M., Spence, C., Viglione, A., and Vogel, R. M.: Prediction of flow
duration curves in ungauged basins, Runoff prediction in ungauged basins:
Synthesis across processes, places and scales, 135–162, https://sites.tufts.edu/richardvogel/files/2019/04/2013_predictionFlowDurationCurves.pdf
(last access: 4 July 2023), 2013. a
Chen, C., Kalra, A., and Ahmad, S.: Hydrologic responses to climate change
using downscaled GCM data on a watershed scale, J. Water Clim. Change, 10, 63–77, 2019. a
Demircan, M., Gürkan, H., Eskioğlu, O., Arabaci, H., and
Coşkun, M.: Climate change projections for Turkey: three models and two
scenarios, Türkiye Su Bilimleri ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 1, 22–43, 2017. a
Duan, Q., Schaake, J., Andréassian, V., Franks, S., Goteti, G., Gupta, H., Gusev, Y., Habets, F., Hall, A., Hay, L., Hogue, T., Huang, M.,
Leavesley, G., Liang, X., Nasonova, O., Noilhan, J., Oudin, L., Sorooshian, S., Wagener, T., and Wood, E.: Model Parameter Estimation
Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from
the second and third workshops, J. Hydrol., 320, 3–17, 2006. a, b
Ficklin, D. L., Null, S. E., Abatzoglou, J. T., Novick, K. A., and Myers,
D. T.: Hydrological Intensification Will Increase the Complexity of Water
Resource Management, Earth's Future, 10, e2021EF002487,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002487, 2022. a
Fowler, K., Knoben, W., Peel, M., Peterson, T., Ryu, D., Saft, M., Seo, K.-W.,
and Western, A.: Many commonly used rainfall-runoff models lack long, slow
dynamics: Implications for runoff projections, Water Resour. Res., 56,
e2019WR025286, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025286, 2020. a
Giorgi, F. and Lionello, P.: Climate change projections for the Mediterranean
region, Global Planet. Change, 63, 90–104, 2008. a
Hamarat, C., Kwakkel, J. H., and Pruyt, E.: Adaptive robust design under deep
uncertainty, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 80, 408–418, 2013. a
Herman, J. D., Zeff, H. B., Reed, P. M., and Characklis, G. W.: Beyond
optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water
portfolio planning under deep uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 50,
7692–7713, 2014. a
Herman, J. D., Reed, P. M., Zeff, H. B., and Characklis, G. W.: How should
robustness be defined for water systems planning under change?, J.
Water Res. Plan. Man., 141, 04015012, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000509, 2015. a
Kasprzyk, J. R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P. M., and Lempert, R. J.: Many objective
robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 42, 55–71, 2013. a
Kosugi, K.: Three-parameter lognormal distribution model for soil water
retention, Water Resour. Res., 30, 891–901, 1994. a
Lempert, R. J.: A new decision sciences for complex systems, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 7309–7313, 2002. a
Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., Groves, D. G., Kalra, N., Fischbach, J. R., Bankes, S. C., Bryant, B. P., Collins, M. T., Keller, K., Hackbarth, A., Dixon, L., LaTourrette, T., Reville, R. T., Hall, J. W., Mijere, C., and McInerney, D. J.: Making good decisions without predictions: Robust decision making for
planning under deep uncertainty, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, https://doi.org/10.7249/RB9701, 2013. a
Leong, C. and Yokoo, Y.: A step toward global-scale applicability and
transferability of flow duration curve studies: A flow duration curve review
(2000–2020), J. Hydrol., 603, 126984, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126984, 2021. a
Marchau, V. A., Walker, W. E., Bloemen, P. J., and Popper, S. W.: Decision
making under deep uncertainty: from theory to practice, Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2,
2019. a
McCluskey, A. and Lalkhen, A. G.: Statistics II: Central tendency and spread of
data, Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, 7,
127–130, 2007. a
Nazemi, A., Wheater, H. S., Chun, K. P., and Elshorbagy, A.: A stochastic
reconstruction framework for analysis of water resource system vulnerability
to climate-induced changes in river flow regime, Water Resour. Res.,
49, 291–305, 2013. a
Pendergrass, A. G., Knutti, R., Lehner, F., Deser, C., and Sanderson, B. M.:
Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate, Sci. Rep.,
7, 17966, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17966-y, 2017. a
Pumo, D., Caracciolo, D., Viola, F., and Noto, L. V.: Climate change effects on
the hydrological regime of small non-perennial river basins, Sci.
Total Environ., 542, 76–92, 2016. a
Quinn, J. D., Reed, P. M., Giuliani, M., Castelletti, A., Oyler, J. W., and
Nicholas, R. E.: Exploring how changing monsoonal dynamics and human
pressures challenge multireservoir management for flood protection,
hydropower production, and agricultural water supply, Water Resour.
Res., 54, 4638–4662, 2018. a, b
Ruijsch, J., Verstegen, J. A., Sutanudjaja, E. H., and Karssenberg, D.:
Systemic change in the Rhine-Meuse basin: Quantifying and explaining
parameters trends in the PCR-GLOBWB global hydrological model, Adv.
Water Resour., 155, 104013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104013, 2021. a
Saft, M., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., Perraud, J.-M., and Zhang, L.: Bias in
streamflow projections due to climate-induced shifts in catchment response,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1574–1581, 2016. a
Seibert, J. and van Meerveld, H. J.: Hydrological change modeling: challenges
and opportunities, Hydrol. Process., 30, 4966–4971, 2016. a
Singh, R., Reed, P. M., and Keller, K.: Many-objective robust decision making
for managing an ecosystem with a deeply uncertain threshold response, Ecol.
Soc., 20, 12, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07687-200312, 2015. a
Singh, V. P.: Hydrologic modeling: progress and future directions, Geosci.
Lett., 5, 1–18, 2018. a
Stagge, J. and Moglen, G.: A nonparametric stochastic method for generating
daily climate-adjusted streamflows, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6179–6193,
2013. a
SYGM: Climate change impacts on water resources, Final Report,
General Directorate Of Water Management, Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry, Turkey,
https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/iklim de% C4% 9Fi% C5% 9Fikli% C4% 9Finin su kaynaklar% C4% B1na etkisi/Iklim_NihaiRapor.pdf
(last access: 19 December 2022),
2016 (in Turkish).
a
Tramblay, Y., Rutkowska, A., Sauquet, E., Sefton, C., Laaha, G., Osuch, M., Albuquerque, T., Alves, M. H., Banasik, K., Beaufort, A.,
Brocca, L., Camici, S., Csabai, Z., Dakhlaoui, H., DeGirolamo, A. M., Dörflinger, G., Gallart, F., Gauster, T., Hanich, L., Kohnová,
S., Mediero, L., Plamen, N., Parry, S., Quintana-Seguí, P., Tzoraki, O., and Datry, T.: Trends in
flow intermittence for European rivers, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 66,
37–49, 2021. a
Turkes, M., Turp, M. T., An, N., Ozturk, T., and Kurnaz, M. L.: Impacts of
climate change on precipitation climatology and variability in Turkey, in:
Water resources of Turkey, Springer, 467–491, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11729-0_14, 2020. a
Van Genuchten, M. T.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
44, 892–898, 1980. a
Vogel, R. M. and Fennessey, N.: Flow duration curves I: new interpretation and
confidence intervals, J. Water Res. Plan. Man.,
120, 485–504, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:4(485), 1994. a
Vrugt, J. A. and Sadegh, M.: Toward diagnostic model calibration and
evaluation: Approximate Bayesian computation, Water Resour. Res., 49,
4335–4345, 2013. a
Wang, D. and Hejazi, M.: Quantifying the relative contribution of the climate
and direct human impacts on mean annual streamflow in the contiguous United
States, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00J12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010283, 2011. a
Weisberg, H.: Central tendency and variability, 83, Sage,
ISBN 0-8039-4007-6, 1992. a
Ye, L., Gu, X., Wang, D., and Vogel, R. M.: An unbiased estimator of
coefficient of variation of streamflow, J. Hydrol., 594, 125954,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125954, 2021. a, b
Yildiz, V.: Yildiz/ClimatePerturbed_FDCs: V1.0.2 (v1.0.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7662679, 2023. a, b
Yildiz, V., Hatipoglu, M. A., and Kumcu, S. Y.: Climate Change Impacts on Water
Resources, Water and Wastewater Management: Global Problems and Measures,
p. 17, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95288-4_2, 2022. a
Yilmaz, K. K., Gupta, H. V., and Wagener, T.: A process-based diagnostic
approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic
model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09417, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006716, 2008. a
Zarrin, A. and Dadashi-Roudbari, A.: Projection of future extreme precipitation
in Iran based on CMIP6 multi-model ensemble, Theor. Appl.
Climatol., 144, 643–660, 2021. a
Short summary
The proposed approach is based on the parameterisation of flow duration curves (FDCs) to generate hypothetical streamflow futures. (1) We sample a broad range of future climates with modified values of three key streamflow statistics. (2) We generate an FDC for each hydro-climate future. (3) The resulting ensemble is ready to support robustness assessments in a changing climate. Our approach seamlessly represents a large range of futures with increased frequencies of both high and low flows.
The proposed approach is based on the parameterisation of flow duration curves (FDCs) to...
