Articles | Volume 25, issue 7
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3937–3973, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3937–3973, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021

Technical note 08 Jul 2021

Technical note | 08 Jul 2021

Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages – a unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective

Paul C. Astagneau et al.

Related authors

Technical note: RAT – a robustness assessment test for calibrated and uncalibrated hydrological models
Pierre Nicolle, Vazken Andréassian, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Charles Perrin, Guillaume Thirel, Laurent Coron, and Léonard Santos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5013–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, 2021
Short summary
The effect of natural infrastructure on water erosion mitigation in the Andes
Veerle Vanacker, Armando Molina, Miluska Rosas-Barturen, Vivien Bonnesoeur, Francisco Román-Dañobeytia, Boris Ochoa-Tocachi, and Wouter Buytaert
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-76,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-76, 2021
Preprint under review for SOIL
Short summary
A climatological benchmark for operational radar rainfall bias reduction
Ruben Imhoff, Claudia Brauer, Klaas-Jan van Heeringen, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, Albrecht Weerts, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4061–4080, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4061-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4061-2021, 2021
Short summary
Unravelling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate change
Thibault Lemaitre-Basset, Ludovic Oudin, Guillaume Thirel, and Lila Collet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-361,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-361, 2021
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
The value of satellite soil moisture and snow cover data for the transfer of hydrological model parameters to ungauged sites
Rui Tong, Juraj Parajka, Borbála Széles, Isabella Pfeil, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Jürgen Komma, Peter Valent, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-189,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-189, 2021
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: RAT – a robustness assessment test for calibrated and uncalibrated hydrological models
Pierre Nicolle, Vazken Andréassian, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Charles Perrin, Guillaume Thirel, Laurent Coron, and Léonard Santos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5013–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Reduction of vegetation-accessible water storage capacity after deforestation affects catchment travel time distributions and increases young water fractions in a headwater catchment
Markus Hrachowitz, Michael Stockinger, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Ruud van der Ent, Heye Bogena, Andreas Lücke, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4887–4915, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, 2021
Short summary
Combining split-sample testing and hidden Markov modelling to assess the robustness of hydrological models
Etienne Guilpart, Vahid Espanmanesh, Amaury Tilmant, and François Anctil
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4611–4629, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4611-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4611-2021, 2021
Short summary
Hydrologically informed machine learning for rainfall–runoff modelling: towards distributed modelling
Herath Mudiyanselage Viraj Vidura Herath, Jayashree Chadalawada, and Vladan Babovic
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4373–4401, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4373-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4373-2021, 2021
Short summary
Development and evaluation of 0.05° terrestrial water storage estimates using Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) land surface model and assimilation of GRACE data
Natthachet Tangdamrongsub, Michael F. Jasinski, and Peter J. Shellito
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4185-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4185-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, E. A.: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover, vol. 19, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, Silver Spring, US, 1976. a
Anderson, E. A.: Snow accumulation and ablation model SNOW-17, NOAA’s National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory NWSRFS user manual, 61 pp., Silver Spring, US, 2006. a, b
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Berthet, L., Le Moine, N., Lerat, J., Loumagne, C., Oudin, L., Mathevet, T., Ramos, M.-H., and Valéry, A.: HESS Opinions ”Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models”, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1757–1764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009, 2009. a
Andrews, F. T. and Guillaume, J. H.: hydromad: Hydrological Model Assessment and Development, available at: http://hydromad.catchment.org/ (last access: 6 July 2021), R package version 0.9-26, 2018. a, b, c, d
Andrews, F. T., Croke, B. F. W., and Jakeman, A. J.: An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development, Environ. Modell. Softw., 26, 1171–1185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.006, 2011. a, b
Download
Short summary
The R programming language has become an important tool for many applications in hydrology. In this study, we provide an analysis of some of the R tools providing hydrological models. In total, two aspects are uniformly investigated, namely the conceptualisation of the models and the practicality of their implementation for end-users. These comparisons aim at easing the choice of R tools for users and at improving their usability for hydrology modelling to support more transferable research.