Articles | Volume 25, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
Technical note
 | 
08 Jul 2021
Technical note |  | 08 Jul 2021

Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages – a unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective

Paul C. Astagneau, Guillaume Thirel, Olivier Delaigue, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Juraj Parajka, Claudia C. Brauer, Alberto Viglione, Wouter Buytaert, and Keith J. Beven

Related authors

How well do hydrological models simulate streamflow extremes and drought-to-flood transitions?
Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, Bailey J. Anderson, Paul C. Astagneau, Daniel L. Swain, Pablo A. Mendoza, and Manuela I. Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-781,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-781, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Impact of bias adjustment strategy on ensemble projections of hydrological extremes
Paul C. Astagneau, Raul R. Wood, Mathieu Vrac, Sven Kotlarski, Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Bastien François, and Manuela I. Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3966,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3966, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Economic valuation of subsurface water contributions to watershed ecosystem services using a fully integrated groundwater–surface-water model
Tariq Aziz, Steven K. Frey, David R. Lapen, Susan Preston, Hazen A. J. Russell, Omar Khader, Andre R. Erler, and Edward A. Sudicky
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1549–1568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1549-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1549-2025, 2025
Short summary
Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1277–1294, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025, 2025
Short summary
CH-RUN: a deep-learning-based spatially contiguous runoff reconstruction for Switzerland
Basil Kraft, Michael Schirmer, William H. Aeberhard, Massimiliano Zappa, Sonia I. Seneviratne, and Lukas Gudmundsson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1061–1082, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1061-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1061-2025, 2025
Short summary
Runoff component quantification and future streamflow projection in a large mountainous basin based on a multidata-constrained cryospheric–hydrological model
Mengjiao Zhang, Yi Nan, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1033–1060, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1033-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1033-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring the potential processes controlling changes in precipitation–runoff relationships in non-stationary environments
Tian Lan, Tongfang Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jiefeng Wu, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, E. A.: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover, vol. 19, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, Silver Spring, US, 1976. a
Anderson, E. A.: Snow accumulation and ablation model SNOW-17, NOAA’s National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory NWSRFS user manual, 61 pp., Silver Spring, US, 2006. a, b
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Berthet, L., Le Moine, N., Lerat, J., Loumagne, C., Oudin, L., Mathevet, T., Ramos, M.-H., and Valéry, A.: HESS Opinions ”Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models”, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1757–1764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009, 2009. a
Andrews, F. T. and Guillaume, J. H.: hydromad: Hydrological Model Assessment and Development, available at: http://hydromad.catchment.org/ (last access: 6 July 2021), R package version 0.9-26, 2018. a, b, c, d
Andrews, F. T., Croke, B. F. W., and Jakeman, A. J.: An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development, Environ. Modell. Softw., 26, 1171–1185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.006, 2011. a, b
Download
Short summary
The R programming language has become an important tool for many applications in hydrology. In this study, we provide an analysis of some of the R tools providing hydrological models. In total, two aspects are uniformly investigated, namely the conceptualisation of the models and the practicality of their implementation for end-users. These comparisons aim at easing the choice of R tools for users and at improving their usability for hydrology modelling to support more transferable research.
Share