Articles | Volume 25, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
Technical note
 | 
08 Jul 2021
Technical note |  | 08 Jul 2021

Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages – a unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective

Paul C. Astagneau, Guillaume Thirel, Olivier Delaigue, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Juraj Parajka, Claudia C. Brauer, Alberto Viglione, Wouter Buytaert, and Keith J. Beven

Viewed

Total article views: 156,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
80,342 75,851 80 156,273 76 81
  • HTML: 80,342
  • PDF: 75,851
  • XML: 80
  • Total: 156,273
  • BibTeX: 76
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 156,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 142,734 with geography defined and 13,539 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The R programming language has become an important tool for many applications in hydrology. In this study, we provide an analysis of some of the R tools providing hydrological models. In total, two aspects are uniformly investigated, namely the conceptualisation of the models and the practicality of their implementation for end-users. These comparisons aim at easing the choice of R tools for users and at improving their usability for hydrology modelling to support more transferable research.