Articles | Volume 25, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021
Technical note
 | 
08 Jul 2021
Technical note |  | 08 Jul 2021

Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages – a unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective

Paul C. Astagneau, Guillaume Thirel, Olivier Delaigue, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Juraj Parajka, Claudia C. Brauer, Alberto Viglione, Wouter Buytaert, and Keith J. Beven

Viewed

Total article views: 159,585 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
82,555 76,881 149 159,585 172 190
  • HTML: 82,555
  • PDF: 76,881
  • XML: 149
  • Total: 159,585
  • BibTeX: 172
  • EndNote: 190
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 159,585 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 146,000 with geography defined and 13,585 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 16 May 2026
Download
Short summary
The R programming language has become an important tool for many applications in hydrology. In this study, we provide an analysis of some of the R tools providing hydrological models. In total, two aspects are uniformly investigated, namely the conceptualisation of the models and the practicality of their implementation for end-users. These comparisons aim at easing the choice of R tools for users and at improving their usability for hydrology modelling to support more transferable research.
Share