Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018
Research article
 | 
03 May 2018
Research article |  | 03 May 2018

Drainage area characterization for evaluating green infrastructure using the Storm Water Management Model

Joong Gwang Lee, Christopher T. Nietch, and Srinivas Panguluri

Related subject area

Subject: Urban Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: Modeling spatial fields of extreme precipitation – a hierarchical Bayesian approach
Bianca Rahill-Marier, Naresh Devineni, and Upmanu Lall
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5685–5695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intersecting near-real time fluvial and pluvial inundation estimates with sociodemographic vulnerability to quantify a household flood impact index
Matthew Preisser, Paola Passalacqua, R. Patrick Bixler, and Julian Hofmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3941–3964, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022, 2022
Short summary
Forecasting green roof detention performance by temporal downscaling of precipitation time-series projections
Vincent Pons, Rasmus Benestad, Edvard Sivertsen, Tone Merete Muthanna, and Jean-Luc Bertrand-Krajewski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2855–2874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating different machine learning methods to simulate runoff from extensive green roofs
Elhadi Mohsen Hassan Abdalla, Vincent Pons, Virginia Stovin, Simon De-Ville, Elizabeth Fassman-Beck, Knut Alfredsen, and Tone Merete Muthanna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5917–5935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021, 2021
Short summary
Modeling and interpreting hydrological responses of sustainable urban drainage systems with explainable machine learning methods
Yang Yang and Ting Fong May Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5839–5858, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Braden, J. B. and Johnston, D. M.: Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management, J. Water Res. Pl., 130, 498–505, 2004.
Debo, T. N. and Reese, A. J.: Municipal Stormwater Management. 2nd Edition. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, ISBN 9781566705844, 2002.
Dietz, M. E.: Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions, Water Air Soil Poll., 186, 351–363, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z, 2007.
ESRI: ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2., Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands, CA, USA, 2013.
Fletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., and Hamel, P.: Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters – A state of the art, Adv. Water Res., 51, 261–279, 2013.
Download
Short summary
This paper demonstrates an approach to spatial discretization for analyzing green infrastructure (GI) using SWMM. Besides DCIA, pervious buffers should be identified for GI modeling. Runoff contributions from different spatial components and flow pathways would impact GI performance. The presented approach can reduce the number of calibration parameters and apply scale–independently to a watershed scale. Hydrograph separation can add insights for developing GI scenarios.