Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018
Research article
 | 
03 May 2018
Research article |  | 03 May 2018

Drainage area characterization for evaluating green infrastructure using the Storm Water Management Model

Joong Gwang Lee, Christopher T. Nietch, and Srinivas Panguluri

Related subject area

Subject: Urban Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Combining statistical and hydrodynamic models to assess compound flood hazards from rainfall and storm surge: a case study of Shanghai
Hanqing Xu, Elisa Ragno, Sebastiaan N. Jonkman, Jun Wang, Jeremy D. Bricker, Zhan Tian, and Laixiang Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3919–3930, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3919-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3919-2024, 2024
Short summary
An optimized long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach applied to early warning and forecasting of ponding in the urban drainage system
Wen Zhu, Tao Tao, Hexiang Yan, Jieru Yan, Jiaying Wang, Shuping Li, and Kunlun Xin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2035–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2035-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2035-2023, 2023
Short summary
A deep-learning-technique-based data-driven model for accurate and rapid flood predictions in temporal and spatial dimensions
Qianqian Zhou, Shuai Teng, Zuxiang Situ, Xiaoting Liao, Junman Feng, Gongfa Chen, Jianliang Zhang, and Zonglei Lu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1791–1808, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1791-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1791-2023, 2023
Short summary
Impact of urban geology on model simulations of shallow groundwater levels and flow paths
Ane LaBianca, Mette H. Mortensen, Peter Sandersen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Karsten H. Jensen, and Jacob Kidmose
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1645–1666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: Modeling spatial fields of extreme precipitation – a hierarchical Bayesian approach
Bianca Rahill-Marier, Naresh Devineni, and Upmanu Lall
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5685–5695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Braden, J. B. and Johnston, D. M.: Downstream economic benefits from storm-water management, J. Water Res. Pl., 130, 498–505, 2004.
Debo, T. N. and Reese, A. J.: Municipal Stormwater Management. 2nd Edition. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, ISBN 9781566705844, 2002.
Dietz, M. E.: Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions, Water Air Soil Poll., 186, 351–363, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z, 2007.
ESRI: ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2., Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands, CA, USA, 2013.
Fletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., and Hamel, P.: Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters – A state of the art, Adv. Water Res., 51, 261–279, 2013.
Download
Short summary
This paper demonstrates an approach to spatial discretization for analyzing green infrastructure (GI) using SWMM. Besides DCIA, pervious buffers should be identified for GI modeling. Runoff contributions from different spatial components and flow pathways would impact GI performance. The presented approach can reduce the number of calibration parameters and apply scale–independently to a watershed scale. Hydrograph separation can add insights for developing GI scenarios.