Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1413–1422, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Predictions under change: water, earth, and biota in the anthropocene...
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1413–1422, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review article 11 Apr 2014
Review article | 11 Apr 2014
Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin
P. Gober and H. S. Wheater
Related authors
No articles found.
U. Nachshon, A. Ireson, G. van der Kamp, S. R. Davies, and H. S. Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1251–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1251-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1251-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Quantifying the impacts of compound extremes on agriculture
Comparison of published palaeoclimate records suitable for reconstructing annual to sub-decadal hydroclimatic variability in eastern Australia: implications for water resource management and planning
Unraveling intractable water conflicts: the entanglement of science and politics in decision-making on large hydraulic infrastructure
A Water-Energy-Food Nexus approach for conducting trade-off analysis: Morocco's phosphate industry in the Khouribga region
A watershed classification approach that looks beyond hydrology: application to a semi-arid, agricultural region in Canada
Role-play simulations as an aid to achieve complex learning outcomes in hydrological science
Using a coupled agent-based modeling approach to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions
Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging
Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience
Challenges to implementing bottom-up flood risk decision analysis frameworks: how strong are social networks of flooding professionals?
Socio-hydrological spaces in the Jamuna River floodplain in Bangladesh
An improved method for calculating the regional crop water footprint based on a hydrological process analysis
How downstream sub-basins depend on upstream inflows to avoid scarcity: typology and global analysis of transboundary rivers
An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: case study research
HESS Opinions: A conceptual framework for assessing socio-hydrological resilience under change
Socio-hydrological perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and groundwater in Cangzhou, North China Plain
Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research
Geoscience on television: a review of science communication literature in the context of geosciences
A "mental models" approach to the communication of subsurface hydrology and hazards
Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity
Socio-hydrological water balance for water allocation between human and environmental purposes in catchments
Long-term monitoring of nitrate transport to drainage from three agricultural clayey till fields
Complex network theory, streamflow, and hydrometric monitoring system design
Hydrological drought types in cold climates: quantitative analysis of causing factors and qualitative survey of impacts
Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities
Assessing blue and green water utilisation in wheat production of China from the perspectives of water footprint and total water use
A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods
Quantifying the human impact on water resources: a critical review of the water footprint concept
Endogenous change: on cooperation and water availability in two ancient societies
Relationships between environmental governance and water quality in a growing metropolitan area of the Pacific Northwest, USA
A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step – human agency, hydrological processes and time in socio-hydrology
Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji–Tire model
Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world
Evolving water science in the Anthropocene
Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
Reconstructing the duty of water: a study of emergent norms in socio-hydrology
Water consumption from hydropower plants – review of published estimates and an assessment of the concept
Water Accounting Plus (WA+) – a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements
Cyanobacterial and microcystins dynamics following the application of hydrogen peroxide to waste stabilisation ponds
A regional and multi-faceted approach to postgraduate water education – the WaterNet experience in Southern Africa
Reframing hydrology education to solve coupled human and environmental problems
Experiences from online and classroom education in hydroinformatics
Enhancing capacities of riparian professionals to address and resolve transboundary issues in international river basins: experiences from the Lower Mekong River Basin
Assessing ecological land use and water demand of river systems: a case study in Luanhe River, North China
Irrigania – a web-based game about sharing water resources
Competence formation and post-graduate education in the public water sector in Indonesia
A climate-flood link for the lower Mekong River
Experiences of using mobile technologies and virtual field tours in Physical Geography: implications for hydrology education
The Indus basin in the framework of current and future water resources management
Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest Region of North America
Iman Haqiqi, Danielle S. Grogan, Thomas W. Hertel, and Wolfram Schlenker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 551–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-551-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-551-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study combines a fine-scale weather product with outputs of a hydrological model to construct functional metrics of individual and compound hydroclimatic extremes for agriculture. Then, a yield response function is estimated with individual and compound metrics focusing on corn in the United States during the 1981–2015 period. The findings suggest that metrics of compound hydroclimatic extremes are better predictors of corn yield variations than metrics of individual extremes.
Anna L. Flack, Anthony S. Kiem, Tessa R. Vance, Carly R. Tozer, and Jason L. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5699–5712, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Palaeoclimate information was analysed for eastern Australia to determine when (and where) there was agreement about the timing of wet and dry epochs in the pre-instrumental period (1000–1899). The results show that instrumental records (~1900–present) underestimate the full range of rainfall variability that has occurred. When coupled with projected impacts of climate change and growing demands, these results highlight major challenges for water resource management and infrastructure.
Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Nora Van Cauwenbergh, and Pieter van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4903–4921, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our research studies whether science depoliticizes water conflicts or instead conflicts politicize science–policy processes. We analyze a water conflict due to the development of large infrastructure. We interviewed key actors in the conflict and replicated the results of water resources models developed to solve the conflict. We found that knowledge produced in isolation has no positive effect in transforming the conflict; instead, its potential could be enhanced if produced collaboratively.
Sang-Hyun Lee, Amjad T. Assi, Bassel Daher, Fatima E. Mengoub, and Rabi H. Mohtar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4727–4741, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Proper water availability for the right place and time in a changing climate requires analysis of complex scientific, technical, socioeconomic, regulatory, and political issues. A Water-Energy-Food Nexus Phosphate (WEF-P) Tool, based on integrating supply chain processes, transportation, and water–energy footprints could assess the various scenarios to offer an effective means of ensuring sustainable management of limited resources to both agricultural areas and the phosphate industry.
Jared D. Wolfe, Kevin R. Shook, Chris Spence, and Colin J. Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3945–3967, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Watershed classification can identify regions expected to respond similarly to disturbance. Methods should extend beyond hydrology to include other environmental questions, such as ecology and water quality. We developed a classification for the Canadian Prairie and identified seven classes defined by watershed characteristics, including elevation, climate, wetland density, and surficial geology. Results provide a basis for evaluating watershed response to land management and climate condition.
Arvid Bring and Steve W. Lyon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2369–2378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrology education strives to teach students both quantitative ability and complex professional skills. Our research shows that role-play simulations are useful to make students able to integrate various analytical skills in complicated settings while not interfering with traditional teaching that fosters their ability to solve mathematical problems. Despite this there are several potential challenging areas in using role-plays, and we therefore suggest ways around these potential roadblocks.
Jin-Young Hyun, Shih-Yu Huang, Yi-Chen Ethan Yang, Vincent Tidwell, and Jordan Macknick
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2261–2278, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study applies a two-way coupled agent-based model (ABM) with a river-reservoir management model (RiverWare) to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions using the Bayesian inference mapping joined with the cost–loss model. The calibration results capture the dynamics of historical irrigated area and streamflow changes and suggest that the proposed framework improves the representation of human decision-making processes compared to conventional rule-based ABMs.
Henning Lebrenz and András Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1633–1648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Many variables, e.g., in hydrology, geology, and social sciences, are only observed at a few distinct measurement locations, and their actual distribution in the entire space remains unknown. We introduce the new geostatistical interpolation method of
quantile kriging, providing an improved estimator and associated uncertainty. It can also host variables, which would not fulfill the implicit presumptions of the traditional geostatistical interpolation methods.
Gemma J. Venhuizen, Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Cathelijne R. Stoof, and Ionica Smeets
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Do experts attach the same meaning as laypeople to terms often used in hydrology such as "river", "flooding" and "downstream"? In this study a survey was completed by 34 experts and 119 laypeople to answer this question. We found that there are some profound differences between experts and laypeople: words like "river" and "river basin" turn out to have a different interpretation between the two groups. However, when using pictures there is much more agreement between the groups.
James O. Knighton, Osamu Tsuda, Rebecca Elliott, and M. Todd Walter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5657–5673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Decision-making for flood risk management is often the collective effort of professionals within government, NGOs, private practice, and advocacy groups. Our research investigates differences among flood experts within Tompkins County, New York (USA). We explore how they differ in their perceptions of flooding risk, desired project outcomes, and knowledge. We observe substantial differences among experts, and recommend formally acknowledging these perceptions when engaging in flood management.
Md Ruknul Ferdous, Anna Wesselink, Luigia Brandimarte, Kymo Slager, Margreet Zwarteveen, and Giuliano Di Baldassarre
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5159–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Socio-hydrological space (SHS) is a concept that enriches the study of socio-hydrology because it helps understand the detailed human–water interactions in a specific location. The concept suggests that the interactions between society and water are place-bound because of differences in social processes and river dynamics. This would be useful for developing interventions under disaster management, but also other development goals. SHS provides a new way of looking at socio-hydrological systems.
Xiao-Bo Luan, Ya-Li Yin, Pu-Te Wu, Shi-Kun Sun, Yu-Bao Wang, Xue-Rui Gao, and Jing Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5111–5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
At present, the water footprint calculated by the quantitative method of crop production water footprint is only a field-scale water footprint, which does not contain all the water consumption of the crop growth process, so its calculated crop production water footprint is incomplete. In this study, the hydrological model SWAT was used to analyze the real water consumption in the course of crop growth, so that the actual water consumption of the crops could be more accurately reflected.
Hafsa Ahmed Munia, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Naho Mirumachi, Yoshihide Wada, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2795–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
An analytical framework is developed drawing on ideas of regime shifts from resilience literature to understand the transition between cases where water scarcity is or is not experienced depending on whether water from upstream is or is not available. The analysis shows 386 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible stress and 306 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible shortage. This provides insights into implications for negotiations between sub-basins.
Erik Mostert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 317–329, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper argues for an alternative approach for socio‒hydrology: detailed case study research. Detailed case study research can increase understanding of how society interacts with hydrology, offers more levers for management than coupled modelling, and facilitates interdisciplinary cooperation. The paper presents a case study of the Dommel Basin in the Netherlands and Belgium and compares this with a published model of the Kissimmee Basin in Florida.
Feng Mao, Julian Clark, Timothy Karpouzoglou, Art Dewulf, Wouter Buytaert, and David Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3655–3670, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and analytical assessment of resilience in socio-hydrological contexts. We identify three framings of resilience for different human–water couplings, which have distinct application fields and are used for different water management challenges. To assess and improve socio-hydrological resilience in each type, we introduce a
resilience canvasas a heuristic tool to design bespoke management strategies.
Songjun Han, Fuqiang Tian, Ye Liu, and Xianhui Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3619–3633, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The history of the co-evolution of the coupled human–groundwater system in Cangzhou (a region with the most serious depression cone in the North China Plain) is analyzed with a particular focus on how the groundwater crisis unfolded and how people attempted to settle the crisis. The evolution of the system was substantially impacted by two droughts. Further restoration of groundwater environment could be anticipated, but the occurrence of drought still remains an undetermined external forcing.
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana and Maurits Willem Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.
Rolf Hut, Anne M. Land-Zandstra, Ionica Smeets, and Cathelijne R. Stoof
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2507–2518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
To help geo-scientists prepare for TV appearances, we review the scientific literature on effective science communication related to TV. We identify six main themes: scientist motivation, target audience, narratives and storytelling, jargon and information transfer, relationship between scientists and journalists, and stereotypes of scientists on TV. We provide a detailed case study as illustration for each theme.
Hazel Gibson, Iain S. Stewart, Sabine Pahl, and Alison Stokes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1737–1749, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides empirical evidence for the value of using a psychology-based approach to communication of hydrology and hazards. It demonstrates the use of the "mental models" approach to risk assessment used in a regional geoscience context to explore the conceptions of the geological subsurface between experts and non-experts, and how that impacts on communication.
J. F. Schyns, A. Y. Hoekstra, and M. J. Booij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4581–4608, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The paper draws attention to the fact that green water (soil moisture returning to the atmosphere through evaporation) is a scarce resource, because its availability is limited and there are competing demands for green water. Around 80 indicators of green water availability and scarcity are reviewed and classified based on their scope and purpose of measurement. This is useful in order to properly include limitations in green water availability in water scarcity assessments.
S. Zhou, Y. Huang, Y. Wei, and G. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3715–3726, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, 2015
V. Ernstsen, P. Olsen, and A. E. Rosenbom
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3475–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, 2015
M. J. Halverson and S. W. Fleming
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3301–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, 2015
A. F. Van Loon, S. W. Ploum, J. Parajka, A. K. Fleig, E. Garnier, G. Laaha, and H. A. J. Van Lanen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1993–2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological drought types in cold climates have complex causing factors and impacts. In Austria and Norway, a lack of snowmelt is mainly related to below-normal winter precipitation, and a lack of glaciermelt is mainly related to below-normal summer temperature. These and other hydrological drought types impacted hydropower production, water supply, and agriculture in Europe and the US in the recent and far past. For selected drought events in Norway impacts could be coupled to causing factors.
A. Fernald, S. Guldan, K. Boykin, A. Cibils, M. Gonzales, B. Hurd, S. Lopez, C. Ochoa, M. Ortiz, J. Rivera, S. Rodriguez, and C. Steele
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 293–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, 2015
X. C. Cao, P. T. Wu, Y. B. Wang, and X. N. Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3165–3178, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, 2014
K. Madani, M. Zarezadeh, and S. Morid
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3055–3068, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, 2014
J. Chenoweth, M. Hadjikakou, and C. Zoumides
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2325–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, 2014
S. Pande and M. Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1745–1760, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, 2014
H. Chang, P. Thiers, N. R. Netusil, J. A. Yeakley, G. Rollwagen-Bollens, S. M. Bollens, and S. Singh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1383–1395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, 2014
M. W. Ertsen, J. T. Murphy, L. E. Purdue, and T. Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1369–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, 2014
Y. Liu, F. Tian, H. Hu, and M. Sivapalan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289–1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, 2014
S. N. Lane
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014
H. H. G. Savenije, A. Y. Hoekstra, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 319–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, 2014
A. Wutich, A. C. White, D. D. White, K. L. Larson, A. Brewis, and C. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 109–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, 2014
J. L. Jr. Wescoat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4759–4768, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, 2013
T. H. Bakken, Å. Killingtveit, K. Engeland, K. Alfredsen, and A. Harby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3983–4000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, 2013
P. Karimi, W. G. M. Bastiaanssen, and D. Molden
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2459–2472, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2459-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2459-2013, 2013
D. J. Barrington, A. Ghadouani, and G. N. Ivey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2097–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2097-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2097-2013, 2013
L. Jonker, P. van der Zaag, B. Gumbo, J. Rockström, D. Love, and H. H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4225–4232, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4225-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4225-2012, 2012
E. G. King, F. C. O'Donnell, and K. K. Caylor
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4023–4031, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012, 2012
I. Popescu, A. Jonoski, and B. Bhattacharya
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3935–3944, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3935-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3935-2012, 2012
W. Douven, M. L. Mul, B. Fernández-Álvarez, S. Lam Hung, N. Bakker, G. Radosevich, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3183–3197, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3183-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3183-2012, 2012
D. H. Yan, G. Wang, H. Wang, and T. L. Qin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2469–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012, 2012
J. Seibert and M. J. P. Vis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2523–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2523-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2523-2012, 2012
J. M. Kaspersma, G. J. Alaerts, and J. H. Slinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2379–2392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2379-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2379-2012, 2012
J. M. Delgado, B. Merz, and H. Apel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1533–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1533-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1533-2012, 2012
D. G. Kingston, W. J. Eastwood, P. I. Jones, R. Johnson, S. Marshall, and D. M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1281–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012, 2012
A. N. Laghari, D. Vanham, and W. Rauch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1063–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1063-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1063-2012, 2012
A. F. Hamlet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011, 2011
Cited articles
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: An Overview of the Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food System, available at:http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1295963199087&lang=eng (last access: 3 April 2013), 2011.
Alberta Environment: Surface Water Quality Guidelines for Use in Alberta, available at: http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/5713.pdf (last access: 9 April 2013), 1999.
Alberta Environment: South Saskatchewan River Basin Water Management Plan Phase 2, Alberta Environment Publication No. 719, available at: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/water/regions/ssrb/pdf_phase2/Phase20Part120Results201020-2%20sided
Alberta Environment: Water for Life: Alberta's Strategy for Sustainability, available at: http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/6190.pdf (last access: 19 March 2013), 2003b.
Alberta Environment: Water for Life Progress Report: December 1, 2008–March 31, 2011, available at: http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/8437.pdf (last access: 19 March 2013), 2012.
Alberta Water Exchange: What we do, available at: http://www.alberta-water-exchange.com/what-we-do/ (last access: 3 April 2013), 2012.
Bonsal, B. R. and Prowse, T. D.: Trends and variability in spring and autumn 0 °C isotherm dates over Canada, Climatic Change, 57, 341–358, 2003.
Bonsal, B. R., Aider, R., Gachon, P., and Lapp, S.: An assessment of Canadian prairie drought: Past, present, and future, Clim. Dynam., 41, 510–516, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1422-0, 2012.
Brunner, R. D.: Adaptive governance as a reform strategy, Policy Sci., 43, 301–341, 2010.
Calgary Herald: Redford government considers insurance options, available at: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Redford+government+considers+flood+insurance+options/8991400/story.html (last access: 7 April 2014), 2013.
CBC News: Manitoba flood cost soars to $815 M, available at: www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/12/14/mb-flood-cost-rising-manitoba.html (last access: 20 March 2012), 14 December 2011.
CBC News: Premier estimates flood costs to top $5 billion, available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/premier-estimates-alberta-flood-costs-to-top-5b-1.1355419 (last access: 18 November 2013), 20 August 2013.
Centre for the Study of Living Standards: The Human Development Index in Canada: Estimates for Canadian Provinces and Territories, 2000–2011, available at: http://www.csls.ca/reports/csls2012-02.pdf (last access: 8 March 2013), 2012.
Cohen, B. L. and Wallsten, T. S.: The effect of constant outcome value on judgments and decision making given linguistic probabilities, J. Behav. Decis. Making., 5, 53–72, 1992.
Comeau, L. E. L., Pietroniro, A., and Demuth, M. N.: Glacier contribution to the North and South Saskatchewan Rivers, Hydrol. Process., 23, 2640–2653, 2009.
Demuth, M. N. and Pietroniro, A.: The impact of climate change on the glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountain eastern slopes and implications for water resource-related adaptation in the Canadian prairies, "Phase I" – Headwaters of the North Saskatchewan River Basin, Report to the Climate Change Action Fund – Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative, PARC. Project P55, Geological Survey of Canada Open File 4322, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 2003.
Diaz, H., Kulshreshtha, S., Matlock, B., Wheaton, E., and Whitlock, V.: Community case studies of vulnerability to climate change Cabri and Stewart Valley Saskatchewan, in: A Dry Oasis: Institutional Adaptation to Climate on the Canadian Plains, edited by: Marchildon, G. P., Canadian Plains Research Center Press, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 261–289, 2009.
Diaz, H. P. and Warren, J.: Defying Palliser: Stories from the Driest Region of the Canadian Prairies, University of Regina Press, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 2012.
Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan: Great Depression, available at: http://esask.uregina.ca/entry/great depression.html (last access: 7 March 2013), 2012.
Fang, X., Minke, A., Pomeroy, J., Brown, T., Westbrook, C., Guo, X., and Guangul, S. A.: Review of Canadian prairie hydrology: Principles, Modeling and Response to Land use and Drainage Change, University of Saskatchewan Centre for Hydrology Report #2, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 32 pp., 2007.
Feldman, D. L. and Ingram, H. M.: Making science useful to decision makers: Climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1452–1453, 2009.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J.: Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 30, 441–473, 2005.
Gober, P.: Getting outside the water box: The need for new approaches to water planning and policy, Water Resour. Manage., 27, 955–957, 2013.
Gober, P., Kirkwood, C., Balling Jr., R. C., Ellis, A. W., and Detrick, S.: Water planning under climatic uncertainty in Phoenix: Why we need a new paradigm, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 100, 357–372, 2010.
Gober, P., Strickert, G., Clark, D., Chun, S., Payton, D., and Bruce, K.: Divergent perspectives on water security: Bridging the policy debate, Prof. Geogr., https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.883960, in press, 2014.
Harder, P. and Pomeroy, J.: The impact of climate change and forest management on the hydrometeorology of a Canadian Rockies subalpine basin. Proc. Marmot Creek Research Basin workshop, Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, available at: http://www.usask.ca/hydrology/MarmotCrkWshop2013/PDFs/Harder.pdf (last access: 16 May 2013), 2013.
Health Canada.: Drinking Water and Wastewater, available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/promotion/public-publique/water-eau-eng.php#how_many (last access: 22 November 2013), 2013.
Hecker, M., Khim, J. S., Giesy, J. P., Li, S.-Q., and Ryu, J.-H.: Seasonal nutrient loading and Chlorophyll A in a northern prairies reservoir Saskatchewan Canada. J. Water Res. Protect., 4, 180–202, 2012.
Huitema, D. and Meijerink, S.: Realizing water transitions: the role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change, Ecol. Soc., 15, available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15 (last access: 30 January 2014), 2010.
Hulbert, M., Diaz, H., Corkal, D. R., and Warren, J.: Climate change and water governance in Saskatchewan, Canada, Int. J. Climate Change Strat. Manage., 1, 118–132, 2009.
Karl, T. R., Meehl, G. A., Miller, C. D., Hassol, S. J., Waple, A. M., and Murray, W. L. (Eds.): Why weather and climate extremes matter. Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate. Regions of Focus: North America, Hawaii, Caribbean, and U.S. Pacific Islands, Department of Commerce, NOAA's National Climatic Data Center, Washington, D.C., USA, 2008.
Khaliq, M. N., Sushama, L., Monette, A., and Wheater, H. S.: Seasonal and extreme precipitation characteristics for the watersheds of the Canadian Prairie Provinces as simulated by the NARCCAP multi-RCM ensemble, Clim. Dynam., in review, 2014.
Kling, H. J., Watson, S. B., McCullough, G. K., and Stainton, M. P.: Bloom development and phytoplankton succession in Lake Winnipeg: A comparison of historical records with recent data, Aqut. Ecosyst. Health Manage., 14, 219–224, 2011.
Lachapelle, E.,Borick, C. P., and Rabe, B.: Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the U.S. compared, Rev. Policy Res., 29, 334–355, 2012.
Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., and Banks, S. C.: Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-term Policy Analysis, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 209 pp., 2003.
Marchildon, G. P. (Ed.): Introduction, in: A Dry Oasis: Institutional Adaptation to Climate on the Canadian Plains, Canadian Plains Research Center Press, Regina, SK, Canada, vii–xiii, 2009.
Marshall, S. J., White, E. C., Demuth, M. N., Bolch, T., Wheate, R., Menounos, B., Beedle, M. J., and Shea, J. M.: Glacier water resources on the eastern slopes of the Canadian Rocky Mountains, Can. Water Resour. J., 36, 109–134, 2011.
Martz, L., Armstrong, R., and Pietroniro, E.: The South Saskatchewan River Basin: Physical Geography, in: Climate Change and Water: SSRB Final Technical Report, edited by: Martz, L., Bruneau, J., and Rolfe, J. T., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 2007.
Mearns, L. O., Aritt, R., Biner, S., Bukovsky, M. S., McGinnis, S., Sain, S., Caya, D., Correia Jr., J., Flory, D., Gutowski, W., Takle, E. S., Jones, R., Leung, R., Moufouma-Okia, W., McDaniel, L., Nunes, A. M. B., Qian, Y., Roads, J., Sloan, L., and Snyder, M.: The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1337–1362, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00223.1, 2012.
Moore, R. D., Fleming, S. W., Menounos, B., Wheate, R., Fountain, A., Stahl, K., Holm, K., and Jakob, M.: Glacier change in western North America: influences on hydrology, geomorphic hazards and water quality, Hydrol. Process., 23, 42–61, 2009.
Natural Resources Canada: The Atlas of Canada: Boreal Forest, available at: http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/learningresources/theme_modules/borealforest/index.html (last access: 20 March 2012), 2009.
Natural Resources Canada: Mountain Pine Beetle, available at: http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pages/49 (last access: 20 March 2012), 2012.
National Research Council: Evaluating Progress of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Methods and Preliminary Results, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2007.
Partners for the Saskatchewan River Basin: From the Mountains to the Sea: Summary of the State of the Saskatchewan River Basin, Partners for the Saskatchewan River Basin, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 2009.
Patrick, R. J.: Uneven access to safe drinking water for First Nations in Canada: Connecting health and place through source water protection, Health Place, 17, 386–389, 2011.
Peach, D. W.: Groundwater and Sustainability in Saskatchewan, Global Institute of Water Security Report, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2013.
Pomeroy, J. W., de Boer, D., and Martz, L. M.: Hydrology and Water Resources of Saskatchewan, University of Saskatchewan Centre for Hydrology Report #1, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2005.
Pomeroy, J. W., Fang, X., and Williams, B.: Impacts of Climate Change on Saskatchewan's Water Resources, University of Saskatchewan Centre for Hydrology Report #6, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2009.
Prairie Provinces Water Board: 1969 Master Agreement on Apportionment, available at: http://www.ppwb.ca/information/79/index.html (last access: 29 January 2014), 2009.
Quay, R.: Anticipatory governance: A tool for climate change adaptation, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 76, 496–511, 2010.
Reece, W. and Matthews, L.: Evidence and uncertainty in subjective prediction: Influences on optimistic judgment, Psychol. Rep., 72, 435–439, 1993.
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture: Irrigation: Lake Diefenbaker's Unfinished Business, available at: http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=227d43cb-139d-418d-a6a8-45d3bd02ce0e (last access: 12 March 2013), 2012.
Saskatchewan Water Security Agency: 25 Year Saskatchewan Water Security Plan, available at:
Saskatchewan Water Security Agency: Dams and Reservoirs: Lake Diefenbaker, available at: http://www.swa.ca/WaterManagement/DamsAndReservoirs.asp?type=LakeDiefenbaker, last access: 7 April 2014.
Schindler, D. and Donahue, W.: An impending water crisis in Canada's western prairie provinces, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 103, 7210–7216, 2006.
Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. G., and Blöschl, G.: Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1270–1276, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426, 2012.
Statistics Canada: Population and dwelling counts, for Canada, provinces and territories, 2011 and 2006 censuses, available at: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/hlt-fst/pd-pl/Table-Tableau.cfm?LANG=Eng&T=101&S=50&O=A (last access, 11 April 2013), 2013.
The Economist: Alberta's floods: A changing tide?, http://www.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2013/06/alberta-s-floods (last access: 18 November 2013), 26 June 2013.
Timmer, D. K., de Loe, R. C., and Kreutzwider, R. D.: Source water protection in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia: Lessons for building local capacity, Land Use Policy, 24, 187–198, 2007.
Toth, B., Corkal, D. R., Sauchyn, D., van der Kamp, G., and Pietroniro, E.: The Natural Characteristics of the South Saskatchewan River Basin: Climate, Geography and Hydrology, in: A Dry Oasis: Institutional Adaptation to Climate on the Canadian Plains, edited by: Marchildon, G. P., Canadian Plains Research Center Press, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 95–127, 2009.
Wandal, J., Young, G. and Smit, B.: The 2001–2002 drought: Vulnerability and adaptation in Alberta's special areas, in: A Dry Oasis: Institutional Adaptation to Climate on the Canadian Plains, edited by: Marchildon, G. P., Canadian Plains Research Center Press, Regina, SK, Canada, 211–234, 2009.
Wheater, H. S.: Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modeling, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A., 360, 1409–1431, 2002.
Wheater, H. S.: Water management for a changing climate; challenges and opportunities, Proceedings of the 18th Convocation of the International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences (CAETS2009), Calgary, Canada, 3–17 July 2009.
Wheaton, E., Kulshreshtha, S., Wittrock, V., and Koshida, G.: Dry times: hard lessons from the Canadian drought of 2001 and 2002, Can. Geogr., 52, 241–262, 2008.
Wilby, R. L. and Dessai, S.: Robust adaptation to climate change, Weather, 65, 180–185, 2010.
