Articles | Volume 29, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5371-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5371-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Opinion article
| 
21 Oct 2025
Opinion article |
| 21 Oct 2025
| 21 Oct 2025
HESS Opinions: Reflecting and acting on the social aspects of modeling
Janneke O. E. Remmers
Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Rozemarijn ter Horst
Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Ehsan Nabavi
Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Ulrike Proske
Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Jeroen Vos
Water Resources Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Ulrike Proske and Martin Staab
Geosci. Commun., 9, 239–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-239-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-239-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are not just physics translated into code, but they influence and are influenced by humans. Thus modelers need to learn not only the physical basis, but also the underlying motivations and uncertainties of the modeling approach. We develop a course at Bachelor level that aims to teach such interdisciplinary perspectives and show that it proves itself in practice. We share the material as inspiration to include more interdisciplinary content and reflection into modeling courses.
Roel Dijksma, Adriaan J. Teuling, Lieke A. Melsen, Victor F. Bense, and Martine J. van der Ploeg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2489, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2489, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).
Short summary
Short summary
Scientific field work is an expensive and time consuming teaching method is the scientific community. A survey among former participants of a hydrological Master excursion to Iceland, organized by Wageningen University (the Netherlands) showed that real excursions have a long lasting impact on the scientific development of students, in contrast to virtual excursions. As quoted by one of the participants: ‘You can learn a lot in a classroom, but an excursion makes you remember’.
Ulrike Proske, John Hillier, Stefan Gaillard, Theresa Blume, Eduardo Queiroz Alves, Susanne Buiter, Ken S. Carslaw, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, Tim H. M. van Emmerik, Barbara Ervens, Rolf Hut, Sam Illingworth, Daniel Klotz, and Jonas Pyschik
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-987, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-987, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We explain a new article type that is being introduced in participating EGU publications. "LESSONS" articles describe the Limitations, Errors, Surprises, Shortcomings and Opportunities for New Science emerging from the scientific process. The publication of non-positive results and associated learnings aims to complete an unbiased record of the research effort, contributes to open and transparent science, allows the authors and others to learn, and may open opportunities for new science.
Patricio Yeste, Lieke A. Melsen, João Paulo L. F. Brêda, Nicolás Tacoronte, Andrea Saltelli, Giulia Vannucci, Roberta Siciliano, and Axel Bronstert
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1787, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding which factors most influence streamflow is key for accurate hydrologic modelling. This study shows that machine learning methods, like random forests and neural networks, can efficiently identify the most important model inputs, producing results similar to traditional sensitivity analysis but with far less computation. This approach helps scientists explore complex models faster and more reliably, improving insights into how catchments respond to changing conditions.
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren R. Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4651–4667, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4651-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4651-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
A major challenge in climate science is reducing projection uncertainty despite advances in models and observational constraints. Perturbed parameter ensembles (PPEs) offer a powerful tool to explore and reduce uncertainty by revealing model weaknesses and guiding development. PPEs are now widely applied across climate systems and scales. We argue they should be prioritized alongside complexity and resolution in model resource planning.
Hans Segura, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Philipp Weiss, Sebastian K. Müller, Thomas Rackow, Junhong Lee, Edgar Dolores-Tesillos, Imme Benedict, Matthias Aengenheyster, Razvan Aguridan, Gabriele Arduini, Alexander J. Baker, Jiawei Bao, Swantje Bastin, Eulàlia Baulenas, Tobias Becker, Sebastian Beyer, Hendryk Bockelmann, Nils Brüggemann, Lukas Brunner, Suvarchal K. Cheedela, Sushant Das, Jasper Denissen, Ian Dragaud, Piotr Dziekan, Madeleine Ekblom, Jan Frederik Engels, Monika Esch, Richard Forbes, Claudia Frauen, Lilli Freischem, Diego García-Maroto, Philipp Geier, Paul Gierz, Álvaro González-Cervera, Katherine Grayson, Matthew Griffith, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Ioan Hadade, Kerstin Haslehner, Shabeh ul Hasson, Jan Hegewald, Lukas Kluft, Aleksei Koldunov, Nikolay Koldunov, Tobias Kölling, Shunya Koseki, Sergey Kosukhin, Josh Kousal, Peter Kuma, Arjun U. Kumar, Rumeng Li, Nicolas Maury, Maximilian Meindl, Sebastian Milinski, Kristian Mogensen, Bimochan Niraula, Jakub Nowak, Divya Sri Praturi, Ulrike Proske, Dian Putrasahan, René Redler, David Santuy, Domokos Sármány, Reiner Schnur, Patrick Scholz, Dmitry Sidorenko, Dorian Spät, Birgit Sützl, Daisuke Takasuka, Adrian Tompkins, Alejandro Uribe, Mirco Valentini, Menno Veerman, Aiko Voigt, Sarah Warnau, Fabian Wachsmann, Marta Wacławczyk, Nils Wedi, Karl-Hermann Wieners, Jonathan Wille, Marius Winkler, Yuting Wu, Florian Ziemen, Janos Zimmermann, Frida A.-M. Bender, Dragana Bojovic, Sandrine Bony, Simona Bordoni, Patrice Brehmer, Marcus Dengler, Emanuel Dutra, Saliou Faye, Erich Fischer, Chiel van Heerwaarden, Cathy Hohenegger, Heikki Järvinen, Markus Jochum, Thomas Jung, Johann H. Jungclaus, Noel S. Keenlyside, Daniel Klocke, Heike Konow, Martina Klose, Szymon Malinowski, Olivia Martius, Thorsten Mauritsen, Juan Pedro Mellado, Theresa Mieslinger, Elsa Mohino, Hanna Pawłowska, Karsten Peters-von Gehlen, Abdoulaye Sarré, Pajam Sobhani, Philip Stier, Lauri Tuppi, Pier Luigi Vidale, Irina Sandu, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7735–7761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7735-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Next Generation of Earth Modeling Systems project (nextGEMS) developed two Earth system models that use horizontal grid spacing of 10 km and finer, giving more fidelity to the representation of local phenomena, globally. In its fourth cycle, nextGEMS simulated the Earth System climate over the 2020–2049 period under the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Here, we provide an overview of nextGEMS, insights into the model development, and the realism of multi-decadal, kilometer-scale simulations.
Luis A. Ladino, Karin Ardon-Dryer, Diana L. Pereira, Ulrike Proske, Zyanya Ramirez-Diaz, Antonia Velicu, and Zamin A. Kanji
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4499, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4499, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A survey and literature metadata analysis from the cloud physics community are used to investigate the state of diversity, equity and inclusion in the cloud physics research community. We show the evolution of gender contributions to cloud physics and the inclusion of scientists from the Global South. The publication analysis reveals the rate of men and women dropping out of the field is not different, however, gender balance was better achieved when women led publications compared to men.
Devi Purnamasari, Adriaan J. Teuling, and Albrecht H. Weerts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1483–1503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1483-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1483-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces a method to identify irrigated areas by combining hydrology models with satellite temperature data. Our method was tested in the Rhine basin and aligns well with official statistics. It performs best in regions with large farms and less well in areas with small farms. Observed differences to existing data are influenced by data resolution and methods.
Sarra Kchouk, Louise Cavalcante, Lieke A. Melsen, David W. Walker, Germano Ribeiro Neto, Rubens Gondim, Wouter J. Smolenaars, and Pieter R. van Oel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 893–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-893-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-893-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Droughts impact water and people, yet monitoring often overlooks impacts on people. In northeastern Brazil, we compare official data to local experiences, finding data mismatches and blind spots. Mismatches occur due to the data's broad scope missing finer details. Blind spots arise from ignoring diverse community responses and vulnerabilities to droughts. We suggest enhanced monitoring by technical extension officers for both severe and mild droughts.
Ulrike Proske, Michael P. Adams, Grace C. E. Porter, Mark A. Holden, Jaana Bäck, and Benjamin J. Murray
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 979–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-979-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-979-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ice-nucleating particles (INPs) aid the freezing of water droplets in clouds and thus modify cloud properties. In a campaign in a Finnish boreal forest, biological INPs were observed, despite many of their potential biological sources being snow-covered. We sampled tree-dwelling lichens that were not covered in snow and tested their ice nucleation ability in the laboratory. We found that the lichen harbours INPs, which may be important in similar snowy environments.
Ulrike Proske, Nils Brüggemann, Jan P. Gärtner, Oliver Gutjahr, Helmuth Haak, Dian Putrasahan, and Karl-Hermann Wieners
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3493, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3493, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models contain coding mistakes, which may look mundane, but can affect the results of interconnected and complex models in unforeseen ways. We describe a sea ice bug in the coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice model ICON, giving an example of visual and concise bug communication. This bug represents a novel species of resolution-dependent bugs. The case illustrates the value of open documentation of bugs in climate models and to encourage our community to adopt a similar approach.
Franziska Vogel, Michael P. Adams, Larissa Lacher, Polly B. Foster, Grace C. E. Porter, Barbara Bertozzi, Kristina Höhler, Julia Schneider, Tobias Schorr, Nsikanabasi S. Umo, Jens Nadolny, Zoé Brasseur, Paavo Heikkilä, Erik S. Thomson, Nicole Büttner, Martin I. Daily, Romy Fösig, Alexander D. Harrison, Jorma Keskinen, Ulrike Proske, Jonathan Duplissy, Markku Kulmala, Tuukka Petäjä, Ottmar Möhler, and Benjamin J. Murray
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11737–11757, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11737-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11737-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Primary ice formation in clouds strongly influences their properties; hence, it is important to understand the sources of ice-nucleating particles (INPs) and their variability. We present 2 months of INP measurements in a Finnish boreal forest using a new semi-autonomous INP counting device based on gas expansion. These results show strong variability in INP concentrations, and we present a case that the INPs we observe are, at least some of the time, of biological origin.
Rozemarijn ter Horst, Rossella Alba, Jeroen Vos, Maria Rusca, Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Lucie V. Babel, Gert Jan Veldwisch, Jean-Philippe Venot, Bruno Bonté, David W. Walker, and Tobias Krueger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4157–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exact power of models often remains hidden, especially when neutrality is claimed. Our review of 61 scientific articles shows that in the scientific literature little attention is given to the power of water models to influence development processes and outcomes. However, there is a lot to learn from those who are openly reflexive. Based on lessons from the review, we call for power-sensitive modelling, which means that people are critical about how models are made and with what effects.
Adriaan J. Teuling, Belle Holthuis, and Jasper F. D. Lammers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3799–3806, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3799-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3799-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The understanding of spatio-temporal variability of evapotranspiration (ET) is currently limited by a lack of measurement techniques that are low cost and that can be applied anywhere at any time. Here we show that evapotranspiration can be estimated accurately using observations made by smartphone sensors, suggesting that smartphone-based ET monitoring could provide a realistic and low-cost alternative for real-time ET estimation in the field.
Charles Nduhiu Wamucii, Pieter R. van Oel, Adriaan J. Teuling, Arend Ligtenberg, John Mwangi Gathenya, Gert Jan Hofstede, Meine van Noordwijk, and Erika N. Speelman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3495–3518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The study explored the role of serious gaming in strengthening stakeholder engagement in addressing human–water challenges. The gaming approach guided community discussions toward implementable decisions. The results showed increased active participation, knowledge gain, and use of plural pronouns. We observed decreased individual interests and conflicts among game participants. The study presents important implications for creating a collective basis for water resources management.
Jasper M. C. Denissen, Adriaan J. Teuling, Sujan Koirala, Markus Reichstein, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Martha M. Vogel, Xin Yu, and René Orth
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 717–734, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-717-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-717-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Heat extremes have severe implications for human health and ecosystems. Heat extremes are mostly introduced by large-scale atmospheric circulation but can be modulated by vegetation. Vegetation with access to water uses solar energy to evaporate water into the atmosphere. Under dry conditions, water may not be available, suppressing evaporation and heating the atmosphere. Using climate projections, we show that regionally less water is available for vegetation, intensifying future heat extremes.
Ulrike Proske, Sylvaine Ferrachat, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5907–5933, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5907-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5907-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models include treatment of aerosol particles because these influence clouds and radiation. Over time their representation has grown increasingly detailed. This complexity may hinder our understanding of model behaviour. Thus here we simplify the aerosol representation of our climate model by prescribing mean concentrations, which saves run time and helps to discover unexpected model behaviour. We conclude that simplifications provide a new perspective for model study and development.
Zane Dedekind, Ulrike Proske, Sylvaine Ferrachat, Ulrike Lohmann, and David Neubauer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5389–5404, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5389-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5389-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ice particles precipitating into lower clouds from an upper cloud, the seeder–feeder process, can enhance precipitation. A numerical modeling study conducted in the Swiss Alps found that 48 % of observed clouds were overlapping, with the seeder–feeder process occurring in 10 % of these clouds. Inhibiting the seeder–feeder process reduced the surface precipitation and ice particle growth rates, which were further reduced when additional ice multiplication processes were included in the model.
Germano G. Ribeiro Neto, Sarra Kchouk, Lieke A. Melsen, Louise Cavalcante, David W. Walker, Art Dewulf, Alexandre C. Costa, Eduardo S. P. R. Martins, and Pieter R. van Oel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4217–4225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
People induce and modify droughts. However, we do not know exactly how relevant human and natural processes interact nor how to evaluate the co-evolution of people and water. Prospect theory can help us to explain the emergence of drought impacts leading to failed welfare expectations (“prospects”) due to water shortage. Our approach helps to explain socio-hydrological phenomena, such as reservoir effects, and can contribute to integrated drought management considering the local context.
Awad M. Ali, Lieke A. Melsen, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4057–4086, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4057-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4057-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using a new approach based on a combination of modeling and Earth observation, useful information about the filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam can be obtained with limited data and proper rainfall selection. While the monthly streamflow into Sudan has decreased significantly (1.2 × 109–5 × 109 m3) with respect to the non-dam scenario, the negative impact has been masked due to higher-than-average rainfall. We reveal that the dam will need 3–5 more years to complete filling.
Marleen R. Lam, Alessia Matanó, Anne F. Van Loon, Rhoda A. Odongo, Aklilu D. Teklesadik, Charles N. Wamucii, Marc J. C. van den Homberg, Shamton Waruru, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2915–2936, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
There is still no full understanding of the relation between drought impacts and drought indices in the Horn of Africa where water scarcity and arid regions are also present. This study assesses their relation in Kenya. A random forest model reveals that each region, aggregated by aridity, has its own set of predictors for every impact category. Water scarcity was not found to be related to aridity. Understanding these relations contributes to the development of drought early warning systems.
Adrià Fontrodona-Bach, Bettina Schaefli, Ross Woods, Adriaan J. Teuling, and Joshua R. Larsen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2577–2599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2577-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2577-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a dataset of snow water equivalent, the depth of liquid water that results from melting a given depth of snow. The dataset contains 11 071 sites over the Northern Hemisphere, spans the period 1950–2022, and is based on daily observations of snow depth on the ground and a model. The dataset fills a lack of accessible historical ground snow data, and it can be used for a variety of applications such as the impact of climate change on global and regional snow and water resources.
Luuk D. van der Valk, Adriaan J. Teuling, Luc Girod, Norbert Pirk, Robin Stoffer, and Chiel C. van Heerwaarden
The Cryosphere, 16, 4319–4341, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4319-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most large-scale hydrological and climate models struggle to capture the spatially highly variable wind-driven melt of patchy snow cover. In the field, we find that 60 %–80 % of the total melt is wind driven at the upwind edge of a snow patch, while it does not contribute at the downwind edge. Our idealized simulations show that the variation is due to a patch-size-independent air-temperature reduction over snow patches and also allow us to study the role of wind-driven snowmelt on larger scales.
Alessandro Montemagno, Christophe Hissler, Victor Bense, Adriaan J. Teuling, Johanna Ziebel, and Laurent Pfister
Biogeosciences, 19, 3111–3129, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3111-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3111-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the biogeochemical processes that dominate the release and retention of elements (nutrients and potentially toxic elements) during litter degradation. Our results show that toxic elements are retained in the litter, while nutrients are released in solution during the first stages of degradation. This seems linked to the capability of trees to distribute the elements between degradation-resistant and non-degradation-resistant compounds of leaves according to their chemical nature.
Linqi Zhang, Yi Liu, Liliang Ren, Adriaan J. Teuling, Ye Zhu, Linyong Wei, Linyan Zhang, Shanhu Jiang, Xiaoli Yang, Xiuqin Fang, and Hang Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3241–3261, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3241-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3241-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, three machine learning methods displayed a good detection capacity of flash droughts. The RF model was recommended to estimate the depletion rate of soil moisture and simulate flash drought by considering the multiple meteorological variable anomalies in the adjacent time to drought onset. The anomalies of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration exhibited a stronger synergistic but asymmetrical effect on flash droughts compared to slowly developing droughts.
Femke A. Jansen, Remko Uijlenhoet, Cor M. J. Jacobs, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2875–2898, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2875-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2875-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the controls on open water evaporation with a focus on Lake IJssel, the Netherlands, by analysing eddy covariance observations over two summer periods at two locations at the borders of the lake. Wind speed and the vertical vapour pressure gradient can explain most of the variation in observed evaporation, which is in agreement with Dalton's model. We argue that the distinct characteristics of inland waterbodies need to be taken into account when parameterizing their evaporation.
Zoé Brasseur, Dimitri Castarède, Erik S. Thomson, Michael P. Adams, Saskia Drossaart van Dusseldorp, Paavo Heikkilä, Kimmo Korhonen, Janne Lampilahti, Mikhail Paramonov, Julia Schneider, Franziska Vogel, Yusheng Wu, Jonathan P. D. Abbatt, Nina S. Atanasova, Dennis H. Bamford, Barbara Bertozzi, Matthew Boyer, David Brus, Martin I. Daily, Romy Fösig, Ellen Gute, Alexander D. Harrison, Paula Hietala, Kristina Höhler, Zamin A. Kanji, Jorma Keskinen, Larissa Lacher, Markus Lampimäki, Janne Levula, Antti Manninen, Jens Nadolny, Maija Peltola, Grace C. E. Porter, Pyry Poutanen, Ulrike Proske, Tobias Schorr, Nsikanabasi Silas Umo, János Stenszky, Annele Virtanen, Dmitri Moisseev, Markku Kulmala, Benjamin J. Murray, Tuukka Petäjä, Ottmar Möhler, and Jonathan Duplissy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5117–5145, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5117-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5117-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The present measurement report introduces the ice nucleation campaign organized in Hyytiälä, Finland, in 2018 (HyICE-2018). We provide an overview of the campaign settings, and we describe the measurement infrastructure and operating procedures used. In addition, we use results from ice nucleation instrument inter-comparison to show that the suite of these instruments deployed during the campaign reports consistent results.
Ulrike Proske, Sylvaine Ferrachat, David Neubauer, Martin Staab, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4737–4762, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4737-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4737-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud microphysical processes shape cloud properties and are therefore important to represent in climate models. Their parameterization has grown more complex, making the model results more difficult to interpret. Using sensitivity analysis we test how the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM-HAM reacts to changes to these parameterizations. The model is sensitive to the parameterization of ice crystal autoconversion but not to, e.g., self-collection, suggesting that it may be simplified.
Sarra Kchouk, Lieke A. Melsen, David W. Walker, and Pieter R. van Oel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 323–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-323-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-323-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of our study was to question the validity of the assumed direct linkage between drivers of drought and its impacts on water and food securities, mainly found in the frameworks of drought early warning systems (DEWSs). We analysed more than 5000 scientific studies leading us to the conclusion that the local context can contribute to drought drivers resulting in these drought impacts. Our research aims to increase the relevance and utility of the information provided by DEWSs.
Charles Nduhiu Wamucii, Pieter R. van Oel, Arend Ligtenberg, John Mwangi Gathenya, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5641–5665, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5641-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5641-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
East African water towers (WTs) are under pressure from human influences within and without, but the water yield (WY) is more sensitive to climate changes from within. Land use changes have greater impacts on WY in the surrounding lowlands. The WTs have seen a strong shift towards wetter conditions while, at the same time, the potential evapotranspiration is gradually increasing. The WTs were identified as non-resilient, and future WY may experience more extreme variations.
Peter T. La Follette, Adriaan J. Teuling, Nans Addor, Martyn Clark, Koen Jansen, and Lieke A. Melsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5425–5446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5425-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5425-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models are useful tools that allow us to predict distributions and movement of water. A variety of numerical methods are used by these models. We demonstrate which numerical methods yield large errors when subject to extreme precipitation. As the climate is changing such that extreme precipitation is more common, we find that some numerical methods are better suited for use in hydrological models. Also, we find that many current hydrological models use relatively inaccurate methods.
Cited articles
Addor, N. and Melsen, L.: Legacy, rather than adequacy, drives the selection of hydrological models, Water Resources Research, 55, 378–390, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022958, 2019. a
Agrawal, T., Pompoes, R., Verzijl, A., Srinivasan, V., Nair, J., Huijbens, E., Kannadhasan, K., Chokkalingam, K., and Murugan, V.: Creating Kaveri Delta beneath our feet: An experiment in grounding socio-hydrology in Tamil Nadu, India, Journal of Hydrology, 644, 131896, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131896, 2024. a
Alba, R., Krueger, T., Melsen, L., and Venot, J.: Modelling water worlds, Water Alternatives, 18, 214–239, 2025a. a
Alba, R., ter Horst, R., Tran, B., Klein, A., Godinez-Madrigal, J., Unverzagt, K., Verzijl, A., Rusca, M., Vos, J., Venot, J., Zwarteveen, M., and Krueger, T.: Situating hydrological modelling: a proposal for engaging with the power of models, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 12, e70030, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.70030, 2025b. a, b, c
Babel, L., Vinck, D., and Karssenberg, D.: Decision-making in model construction: unveiling habits, Environmental Modelling & Software, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.07.015, 2019. a
Baldissera Pacchetti, M., Jebeile, J., and Thompson, E.: For a Pluralism of Climate Modeling Strategies, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 105, E1350–E1364, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0169.1, 2024. a, b
Beck, M. and Krueger, T.: The epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of uncertainty in integrated assessment modeling, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 627–645, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.415, 2016. a
Beven, K.: Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61, 1652–1665, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761, 2016. a
Beven, K. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, Journal of hydrology, 249, 11–29, 2001. a
Beven, K., Lane, S., Page, T., Kretzschmar, A., Hankin, B., Smith, P., and Chappell, N.: On (in)validating environmental models. 2. Implementation of a Turing-like test to modelling hydrological processes, Hydrological processes, 36, e14703, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14703, 2022. a
Blackett, P., Le Heron, E., Awatere, S., Le Heron, R., Logie, J., Hyslop, J., Ellis, J., Stephenson, F., and Hewitt, J.: Navigating Choppy Waters: why are we always arguing about risk and uncertainty in marine multi-use environments and what can we do about it?, Policy Quarterly, 20, 62–68, https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v20i3.9560, 2024. a
Blaikie, P.: The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN 9781138638853, 1985. a
Burt, T. P. and McDonnell, J. J.: Whither field hydrology? The need for discovery science and outrageous hydrological hypotheses, Water Resources Research, 51, 5919–5928, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016839, 2015. a
Butts, M. B., Payne, J. T., Kristensen, M., and Madsen, H.: An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation, Journal of Hydrology, 298, 242–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.042, 2004. a
Cole, S.: The hierarchy of the sciences?, American Journal of Sociology, 89, 111–139, https://doi.org/10.1086/227835, 1983. a
Comte, A.: The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte, C. Blanchard, translated by: Martineau, H., Batoche Books, Kitchener, 1855. a
Deitrick, A. R., Torhan, S. A., and Grady, C. A.: Investigating the influence of ethical and epistemic values on decisions in the watershed modeling process, Water Resources Research, 57, e2021WR030481, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.023, 2021. a, b
Doorn, N.: Resilience indicators: Opportunities for including distributive justice concerns in disaster management, Journal of Risk Research, 20, 711–731, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1100662, 2017. a, b
Doorn, N.: Artificial intelligence in the water domain: Opportunities for responsible use, Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142561, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142561, 2021. a
Eitzel, M.: Autoethnographic assessment of a manifesto for more trustworthy, relevant, and just models, Environmental Modelling & Software, 164, 105690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105690, 2023. a
Fanelli, D.: “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences, PloS one, 5, e10068, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068, 2010. a
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R.: Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 739–755, 1993. a
Hamilton, S. H., Pollino, C. A., Stratford, D. S., Fu, B., and Jakeman, A. J.: Fit-for-purpose environmental modeling: Targeting the intersection of usability, reliability and feasibility, Environmental Modelling & Software, 148, 105 278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105278, 2022. a
Haraway, D.: Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective 1, in: Women, science, and technology, 455–472, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066, 2013. a
Holmes, D. and Gary, A.: Researcher Positionality – A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research – A New Researcher Guide, Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232, 2020. a
Horton, P., Schaefli, B., and Kauzlaric, M.: Why do we have so many different hydrological models? A review based on the case of Switzerland, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 9, e1574, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1574, 2022. a
Irani, M., Naderi, M. M., Bavani, A. R. M., Hassanzadeh, E., and Moftakhari, H.: A framework for coastal flood hazard assessment under sea level rise: Application to the Persian Gulf, Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119502, 2024. a
Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., and Norton, J. P.: Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models, Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, 602–614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004, 2006. a
Jakeman, A. J., Elsawah, S., Wang, H.-H., Hamilton, S. H., Melsen, L., and Grimm, V.: Towards normalizing good practice across the whole modeling cycle: its instrumentation and future research topics, Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling, 6, 18755–18755, https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.18755, 2024. a, b
Khatami, S., Peel, M., Peterson, T., and Western, A.: Equifinality and Flux Mapping: A New Approach to Model Evaluation and Process Representation Under Uncertainty, Water Resources Research, 55, 8922–8941, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023750, 2019. a
Klein, A., Unverzagt, K., Alba, R., Donges, J. F., Hertz, T., Krueger, T., Lindkvist, E., Martin, R., Niewöhner, J., Prawitz, H., Schlüter, M., Schwarz, L., and Wijermans, N.: From situated knowledges to situated modelling: a relational framework for simulation modelling, Ecosystems and People, 20, 2361706, https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2361706, 2024. a, b, c, d, e
Kopp, R. E., Gilmore, E. A., Little, C. M., Lorenzo-Trueba, J., Ramenzoni, V. C., and Sweet, W. V.: Usable science for managing the risks of sea-level rise, Earth's future, 7, 1235–1269, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001145, 2019. a
Kroepsch, A.: Groundwater Modeling and Governance: Contesting and Building (Sub)Surface Worlds in Colorado’s Northern San Juan Basin, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 4, 43–66, https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.208, 2018. a
Krueger, T. and Alba, R.: Ontological and epistemological commitments in interdisciplinary water research: Uncertainty as an entry point for reflexion, Frontiers in Water, 4, 1038322, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.1038322, 2022. a, b
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., and Hiscock, K.: The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling, Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 4–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011, 2012. a, b, c
Krueger, T., Maynard, C., Carr, G., Bruns, A., Mueller, E. N., and Lane, S.: A transdisciplinary account of water research, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3, 369–389, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1132, 2016. a, b
Lahtinen, T. J., Guillaume, J. H., and Hämäläinen, R. P.: Why pay attention to paths in the practice of environmental modelling?, Environmental Modelling & Software, 92, 74–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.019, 2017. a
Lam, M. R., Bos-Burgering, L. M., Coenders-Gerrits, M. A., Bartholomeus, R. P., Hellegers, P. J., Melsen, L. A., Teuling, A. J., and van Oel, P. R.: The role of decision support tools in drought management: Insights from the Netherlands, Environmental Science & Policy, 168, 104065, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104065, 2025. a
Lane, S. N.: Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014. a
Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., Chang, H., Mantovani, A., McFall-Ngai, M., Rovelli, C., Sober, E., and Pradeu, T.: Why science needs philosophy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 3948–3952, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900357116, 2019. a, b
Latour, B.: Technology is society made durable, The sociological review, 38, 103–131, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x, 1990. a
Law, J.: After method: Mess in social science research, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141, 2004. a
Lenhard, J. and Winsberg, E.: Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 41, 253–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001, 2010. a
Levine, J. R. and Wilson, W. J.: Poverty, Politics, and a “Circle of Promise”: Holistic Education Policy in Boston and the Challenge of Institutional Entrenchment, Journal of urban affairs, 35, 7–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12001, 2013. a
Lim, T. C., Glynn, P. D., Shenk, G. W., Bitterman, P., Guillaume, J. H., Little, J. C., and Webster, D.: Recognizing political influences in participatory social-ecological systems modeling, Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling, 5, 18509–18509, https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.18509, 2023. a
Lin, A. M.: Researcher positionality, Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide, 21–32, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118340349.ch3, 2015. a
Maier, H. R., Taghikhah, F. R., Nabavi, E., Razavi, S., Gupta, H., Wu, W., Radford, D. A., and Huang, J.: How much X is in XAI: Responsible use of “Explainable” artificial intelligence in hydrology and water resources, Journal of Hydrology X, 25, 100185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100185, 2024. a
Malterud, K.: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines, The Lancet, 358, 483–488, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6, 2001. a
Mayer, L. A., Loa, K., Cwik, B., Tuana, N., Keller, K., Gonnerman, C., Parker, A. M., and Lempert, R. J.: Understanding scientists’ computational modeling decisions about climate risk management strategies using values-informed mental models, Global Environmental Change, 42, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.007, 2017. a
McMillan, H., Araki, R., Gnann, S., Woods, R., and Wagener, T.: How do hydrologists perceive watersheds? A survey and analysis of perceptual model figures for experimental watersheds, Hydrological Processes, 37, e14845, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14845, 2023. a
Melsen, L., Puy, A., Torfs, P., and Saltelli, A.: The rise of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency in hydrology, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 70, 1248–1259, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2475105, 2025. a
Melsen, L. A., Vos, J., and Boelens, R.: What is the role of the model in socio-hydrology? Discussion of “Prediction in a socio-hydrological world”, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63, 1435–1443, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1499025, 2018. a, b, c
Mendelsohn, E.: The social construction of scientific knowledge, in: The social production of scientific knowledge, 3–26, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1186-0, 1977. a
Micheletti, T., Wimmler, M.-C., Berger, U., Grimm, V., and McIntire, E. J.: Beyond guides, protocols and acronyms: Adoption of good modelling practices depends on challenging academia's status quo in ecology, Ecological Modelling, 496, 110829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110829, 2024. a
Molle, F.: Water, politics and river basin governance: Repoliticizing approaches to river basin management, Water International, 34, 62–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060802677846, 2009. a
Moon, K. and Blackman, D.: A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists, Conservation Biology, 28, 1167–1177, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326, 2014. a
Nabavi, E.: Failed policies, falling aquifers: Unpacking groundwater overabstraction in Iran, Water Alternatives, 11, 699–724, 2018. a
Nabavi, E.: Computing and Modeling After COVID-19: More Responsible, Less Technical, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 3, 252–261, https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2022.3218738, 2022. a, b, c
Nabavi, E.: Modelling as intervention technology: Science, politics, and water conflicts, Water Alternatives, 18, 330–354, 2025. a
Nabavi, E. and Browne, C.: Leverage zones in Responsible AI: towards a systems thinking conceptualization, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 10, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01579-0, 2023. a
Nabavi, E., Nicholls, R., and Roussos, G.: Locating Responsibility in the Future of Human–AI Interactions, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5, 58–60, https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3386247, 2024. a
Njeri, S.: Race, positionality and the researcher, The companion to peace and conflict fieldwork, 381–394, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46433-2_26, 2021. a
NOS Nieuws: OM onderzoekt mogelijk gesjoemel bij berekening stikstofuitstoot Lelystad Airport, https://nos.nl/artikel/2435719-om-onderzoekt-mogelijk-gesjoemel-bij-berekening-stikstofuitstoot-lelystad-airport (last access: 17 October 2025), 2022. a
Oldfield, M.: Towards pedagogy supporting ethics in modelling, Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 12, 128–159, https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.XVSP3245, 2022. a
OMF: The Open Modeling Foundation, SA. a
Petersen, A. C., Cath, A., Hage, M., Kunseler, E., and van der Sluijs, J. P.: Post-normal science in practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36, 362–388, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910385797, 2011. a
Pulkkinen, K., Undorf, S., Bender, F., Wikman-Svahn, P., Doblas-Reyes, F., Flynn, C., Hegerl, G. C., Jönsson, A., Leung, G.-K., Roussos, J., et al.: The value of values in climate science, Nature Climate Change, 12, 4–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01238-9, 2022. a
Puy, A., Massimi, M., Lankford, B., and Saltelli, A.: Irrigation modelling needs better epistemology, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4, 427–428, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00459-0, 2023. a
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., and Stringer, L. C.: Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001, 2009. a
Refsgaard, J. C.: Terminology, Modelling Protocol And Classification of Hydrological Model Codes, 17–39, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-94-009-0257-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0257-2_2, 1996. a, b
Remmers, J., Teuling, A., and Melsen, L.: A modeller’s fingerprint on hydrodynamic decision support modelling, Environmental Modelling & Software, 181, 106167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106167, 2024. a, b, c, d
Riaux, J., Kuper, M., Massuel, S., and Mekki, I.: Riding the waves of discomforts: Reflecting on the dialogue of hydrologists with society, Journal of Hydrology, 626, 130189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130189, 2023. a
Rödder, S., Heymann, M., and Stevens, B.: Historical, philosophical, and sociological perspectives on earth system modeling, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2020MS002139, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002139, 2020. a
Ross, A. and Chang, H.: Socio-hydrology with hydrosocial theory: two sides of the same coin?, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65, 1443–1457, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1761023, 2020. a, b
Saltelli, A. and Di Fiore, M.: The politics of modelling: Numbers between science and policy, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872412.001.0001, 2023. a, b, c
Saltelli, A., Bammer, G., Bruno, I., Charters, E., Di Fiore, M., Didier, E., Nelson Espeland, W., Kay, J., Lo Piano, S., Mayo, D., Pielke Jr, R., Portaluri, T., Porter, T., Puy, A., Rafols, I., Ravetz, J., Reinert, E., Sarewitz, D., Stark, P., Stirling, A., van der Sluijs, J., and Vineis, P.: Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto, Nature, 582, 482–484, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9, 2020. a, b
Sanz, D., Vos, J., Rambags, F., Hoogesteger, J., Cassiraga, E., and Gómez-Alday, J. J.: The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35, 808–829, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1495619, 2019. a, b
Savenije, H. H. G.: HESS Opinions “The art of hydrology”, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 157–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-157-2009, 2009. a, b, c, d
Simonton, D. K.: Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory, Review of General Psychology, 10, 98–112, https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.98, 2006. a
Sismondo, S.: An introduction to science and technology studies, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1-4051-8765-7, 2011. a
Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H., Blöschl, G.: Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water, Hydrol. Process, 26, 1270–1276, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426, 2012. a
Skinner, C., Thompson, E., Lewis, E., Hut, R., Illingworth, S., and Enright, J.: Adventures in Model Land Framework, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15148953, 2024. a
Soedirgo, J. and Glas, A.: Toward active reflexivity: Positionality and practice in the production of knowledge, PS: Political Science & Politics, 53, 527–531, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519002233, 2020. a, b
Somogyvári, M., Roggero, M., and Krueger, T.: Social Hydrology: interdisciplinary research as part of higher education, EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria, 27 Apr–2 May 2025, EGU25-11346, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu25-11346, 2025. a
Star, S. and Strauss, A.: Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8, 9–30, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359, 1999. a
Stefanidou, C., Skordoulis, C., et al.: Subjectivity and objectivity in science: An educational approach, Advances in historical studies, 3, 183, https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2014.34016, 2014. a
Supreme Court of New South Wales: Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater v Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 206 (8 September 2021), https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2021/206.html (last access: 13 February 2024), 2021. a
ter Horst, A.: Of models and men: Unravelling the influence of water models and exploring how to engage, Phd thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.18174/681490, 2025. a, b
ter Horst, R., Michailovsky, C. I., Salvadore, E., and KS, C.: Does data lead to cooperation? Lessons from Water Accounting Plus in the Cauvery basin, India, Water International, 48, 1025–1045, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2024.2303783, 2023. a
ter Horst, R., Alba, R., Vos, J., Rusca, M., Godinez-Madrigal, J., Babel, L. V., Veldwisch, G. J., Venot, J.-P., Bonté, B., Walker, D. W., and Krueger, T.: Making a case for power-sensitive water modelling: a literature review, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4157–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024, 2024. a, b
Teuling, A. J., De Badts, E. A., Jansen, F. A., Fuchs, R., Buitink, J., Hoek van Dijke, A. J., and Sterling, S. M.: Climate change, reforestation/afforestation, and urbanization impacts on evapotranspiration and streamflow in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3631–3652, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3631-2019, 2019. a
Thaler, T.: Social justice in socio-hydrology – how we can integrate the two different perspectives, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66, 1503–1512, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1950916, 2021. a
Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., and Louder, E.: The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation, Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 42, 15–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009, 2020. a
van der Sluijs, J. P.: A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment, Futures, 34, 133–146, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00051-9, 2002. a
Venot, J.-P., Zwarteveen, M., Kuper, M., Boesveld, H., Bossenbroek, L., Kooij, S. V. D., Wanvoeke, J., Benouniche, M., Errahj, M., Fraiture, C. D., et al.: Beyond the promises of technology: A review of the discourses and actors who make drip irrigation, Irrigation and drainage, 63, 186–194, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1839, 2014. a
Venot, J.-P., Vos, J., Molle, F., Zwarteveen, M., Veldwisch, G. J., Kuper, M., Mdee, A., Ertsen, M., Boelens, R., Cleaver, F., Lankford, B., Swatuk, L., Linton, J., Harris, L. M., Kemerink-Seyoum, J., Kooy, M., and Schwarts, K.: A bridge over troubled waters, Nature Sustainability, 5, 92–92, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00835-y, 2022. a
Wamucii, C. N., van Oel, P. R., Ligtenberg, A., Gathenya, J. M., and Teuling, A. J.: Land use and climate change effects on water yield from East African forested water towers, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5641–5665, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5641-2021, 2021. a
Ward, Z. B.: On value-laden science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 85, 54–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.006, 2021. a
Watts, L. and Hodgson, D.: Critical Social Science and Critical Theory, pp. 97–116, Springer Singapore, Singapore, ISBN 978-981-13-3621-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3621-8_6, 2019. a
Winsberg, E.: Values and uncertainties in the predictions of global climate models, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22, 111–137, https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2012.0008, 2012. a
Xu, L., Gober, P., Wheater, H. S., and Kajikawa, Y.: Reframing socio-hydrological research to include a social science perspective, Journal of hydrology, 563, 76–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.061, 2018. a, b
Zwarteveen, M.: Hydrocracies, Engineers and Power: Questioning Masculinities in Water, Engineering Studies, 9, 78–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2017.1358730, 2017. a
Short summary
Hydrological models are generally seen as neutral, despite acknowledged uncertainties. This notion has several, possibly harmful, consequences. In critical social sciences, non-neutrality in methods and results is an established topic of debate. We propose that in order to deal with it in hydrological modelling, the hydrological modelling network can learn from, and with, critical social sciences. The main lesson, from our perspective, is that responsible modelling is a shared responsibility.
Hydrological models are generally seen as neutral, despite acknowledged uncertainties. This...
Special issue