Articles | Volume 29, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5371-2025
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5371-2025
Opinion article
 | 
21 Oct 2025
Opinion article |  | 21 Oct 2025

HESS Opinions: Reflecting and acting on the social aspects of modeling

Janneke O. E. Remmers, Rozemarijn ter Horst, Ehsan Nabavi, Ulrike Proske, Adriaan J. Teuling, Jeroen Vos, and Lieke A. Melsen

Viewed

Total article views: 4,869 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,194 514 161 4,869 150 202
  • HTML: 4,194
  • PDF: 514
  • XML: 161
  • Total: 4,869
  • BibTeX: 150
  • EndNote: 202
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,869 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,823 with geography defined and 46 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 19 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Hydrological models are generally seen as neutral, despite acknowledged uncertainties. This notion has several, possibly harmful, consequences. In critical social sciences, non-neutrality in methods and results is an established topic of debate. We propose that in order to deal with it in hydrological modelling, the hydrological modelling network can learn from, and with, critical social sciences. The main lesson, from our perspective, is that responsible modelling is a shared responsibility.
Share
Special issue