Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 29, issue 20
Articles | Volume 29, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5371-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5371-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 29, issue 20
Opinion article
 | 
21 Oct 2025
Opinion article |  | 21 Oct 2025

HESS Opinions: Reflecting and acting on the social aspects of modeling

Janneke O. E. Remmers, Rozemarijn ter Horst, Ehsan Nabavi, Ulrike Proske, Adriaan J. Teuling, Jeroen Vos, and Lieke A. Melsen

Viewed

Total article views: 1,010 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
889 96 25 1,010 29 48
  • HTML: 889
  • PDF: 96
  • XML: 25
  • Total: 1,010
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,010 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,010 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Hydrological models are generally seen as neutral, despite acknowledged uncertainties. This notion has several, possibly harmful, consequences. In critical social sciences, non-neutrality in methods and results is an established topic of debate. We propose that in order to deal with it in hydrological modelling, the hydrological modelling network can learn from, and with, critical social sciences. The main lesson, from our perspective, is that responsible modelling is a shared responsibility.
Read more
Share
Special issue
HESS Opinions 2025