Articles | Volume 28, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
01 Mar 2024
Research article |
| 01 Mar 2024
| 01 Mar 2024
Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area
Benjamin L. Ruddell
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Richard Rushforth
School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
Related authors
Elnaz Azmi, Uwe Ehret, Steven V. Weijs, Benjamin L. Ruddell, and Rui A. P. Perdigão
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1103–1115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models should be as simple as possible but not simpler. Simplicity refers to the length of the model and the effort it takes the model to generate its output. Here we present a practical technique for measuring the latter by the number of memory visits during model execution by
Strace, a troubleshooting and monitoring program. The advantage of this approach is that it can be applied to any computer-based model, which facilitates model intercomparison.
Benjamin L. Ruddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5551–5558, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5551-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5551-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We now lack sufficient empirical observations of consumptive use of water by humans and their economy, so it is worth considering what we can do with the withdrawal-based water use data we already possess. Fortunately, a wide range of applied water management and policy questions can be addressed using currently available withdrawal data. This discussion identifies important data collection problems and argues that the withdrawal data we already possess are adequate for some important purposes.
Richard R. Rushforth and Benjamin L. Ruddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3007–3032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3007-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3007-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The National Water Economy Database is a new data resource to better understand the human economy's water use impact on the hydrosphere. NWED quantifies and maps a spatially detailed and economically complete blue water footprint for the United States, utilizing several datasets: US Geological Survey, the US Department of Agriculture, the US Energy Information Administration, the US Department of Transportation, the US Department of Energy, and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Christopher A. Sanchez, Benjamin L. Ruddell, Roy Schiesser, and Venkatesh Merwade
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1289–1299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The use of authentic learning activities is especially important for place-based geosciences like hydrology, where professional breadth and technical depth are critical for practicing hydrologists. The current study found that integrating computerized learning content into the learning experience, using only a simple spreadsheet tool and readily available hydrological data, can effectively bring the "real world" into the classroom and provide an enriching educational experience.
Elnaz Azmi, Uwe Ehret, Steven V. Weijs, Benjamin L. Ruddell, and Rui A. P. Perdigão
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1103–1115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models should be as simple as possible but not simpler. Simplicity refers to the length of the model and the effort it takes the model to generate its output. Here we present a practical technique for measuring the latter by the number of memory visits during model execution by
Strace, a troubleshooting and monitoring program. The advantage of this approach is that it can be applied to any computer-based model, which facilitates model intercomparison.
Benjamin L. Ruddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5551–5558, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5551-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5551-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We now lack sufficient empirical observations of consumptive use of water by humans and their economy, so it is worth considering what we can do with the withdrawal-based water use data we already possess. Fortunately, a wide range of applied water management and policy questions can be addressed using currently available withdrawal data. This discussion identifies important data collection problems and argues that the withdrawal data we already possess are adequate for some important purposes.
Richard R. Rushforth and Benjamin L. Ruddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3007–3032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3007-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3007-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The National Water Economy Database is a new data resource to better understand the human economy's water use impact on the hydrosphere. NWED quantifies and maps a spatially detailed and economically complete blue water footprint for the United States, utilizing several datasets: US Geological Survey, the US Department of Agriculture, the US Energy Information Administration, the US Department of Transportation, the US Department of Energy, and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Christopher A. Sanchez, Benjamin L. Ruddell, Roy Schiesser, and Venkatesh Merwade
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1289–1299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The use of authentic learning activities is especially important for place-based geosciences like hydrology, where professional breadth and technical depth are critical for practicing hydrologists. The current study found that integrating computerized learning content into the learning experience, using only a simple spreadsheet tool and readily available hydrological data, can effectively bring the "real world" into the classroom and provide an enriching educational experience.
Related subject area
Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
HESS Opinions: Drought impacts as failed prospects
HESS Opinions: The unsustainable use of groundwater conceals a “Day Zero”
Drought intensity–duration–frequency curves based on deficit in precipitation and streamflow for water resources management
Uncertainty in three dimensions: the challenges of communicating probabilistic flood forecast maps
To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research
Power and empowerment in transdisciplinary research: a negotiated approach for peri-urban groundwater problems in the Ganges Delta
A socio-hydrological framework for understanding conflict and cooperation with respect to transboundary rivers
A review of the applicability of the motivations and abilities (MOTA) framework for assessing the implementation success of water resources management plans and policies
Social dilemmas and poor water quality in household water systems
The limits to large-scale supply augmentation: exploring the crossroads of conflicting urban water system development pathways
Structural gaps of water resources knowledge in global river basins
Water sharing policies conditioned on hydrologic variability to inform reservoir operations
Characteristics of droughts in Argentina's core crop region
Quantifying the impacts of compound extremes on agriculture
Comparison of published palaeoclimate records suitable for reconstructing annual to sub-decadal hydroclimatic variability in eastern Australia: implications for water resource management and planning
Unraveling intractable water conflicts: the entanglement of science and politics in decision-making on large hydraulic infrastructure
A Water-Energy-Food Nexus approach for conducting trade-off analysis: Morocco's phosphate industry in the Khouribga region
A watershed classification approach that looks beyond hydrology: application to a semi-arid, agricultural region in Canada
Role-play simulations as an aid to achieve complex learning outcomes in hydrological science
Using a coupled agent-based modeling approach to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions
Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging
Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience
Challenges to implementing bottom-up flood risk decision analysis frameworks: how strong are social networks of flooding professionals?
Socio-hydrological spaces in the Jamuna River floodplain in Bangladesh
An improved method for calculating the regional crop water footprint based on a hydrological process analysis
How downstream sub-basins depend on upstream inflows to avoid scarcity: typology and global analysis of transboundary rivers
An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: case study research
HESS Opinions: A conceptual framework for assessing socio-hydrological resilience under change
Socio-hydrological perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and groundwater in Cangzhou, North China Plain
Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research
Geoscience on television: a review of science communication literature in the context of geosciences
A "mental models" approach to the communication of subsurface hydrology and hazards
Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity
Socio-hydrological water balance for water allocation between human and environmental purposes in catchments
Long-term monitoring of nitrate transport to drainage from three agricultural clayey till fields
Complex network theory, streamflow, and hydrometric monitoring system design
Hydrological drought types in cold climates: quantitative analysis of causing factors and qualitative survey of impacts
Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities
Assessing blue and green water utilisation in wheat production of China from the perspectives of water footprint and total water use
A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods
Quantifying the human impact on water resources: a critical review of the water footprint concept
Endogenous change: on cooperation and water availability in two ancient societies
Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin
Relationships between environmental governance and water quality in a growing metropolitan area of the Pacific Northwest, USA
A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step – human agency, hydrological processes and time in socio-hydrology
Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji–Tire model
Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world
Evolving water science in the Anthropocene
Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
Reconstructing the duty of water: a study of emergent norms in socio-hydrology
Germano G. Ribeiro Neto, Sarra Kchouk, Lieke A. Melsen, Louise Cavalcante, David W. Walker, Art Dewulf, Alexandre C. Costa, Eduardo S. P. R. Martins, and Pieter R. van Oel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4217–4225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4217-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
People induce and modify droughts. However, we do not know exactly how relevant human and natural processes interact nor how to evaluate the co-evolution of people and water. Prospect theory can help us to explain the emergence of drought impacts leading to failed welfare expectations (“prospects”) due to water shortage. Our approach helps to explain socio-hydrological phenomena, such as reservoir effects, and can contribute to integrated drought management considering the local context.
Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Juan Pablo Boisier, Rene Garreaud, Javier González, Roberto Rondanelli, Eugenia Gayó, and Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-245, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-245, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This opinion paper reflects on the risks of overusing groundwater savings to supply permanent water use requirements. Using data from Chile, we reveal how groundwater is being overused, causing ecological and socio-economic impacts and concealing a 'Day Zero' scenario. Our argument underscores the need for reformed water allocation rules and sustainable management, shifting from a perception of groundwater as an unlimited source to a finite and vital one.
Yonca Cavus, Kerstin Stahl, and Hafzullah Aksoy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3427–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
With intensified extremes under climate change, water demand increases. Every drop of water is more valuable than before when drought is experienced particularly. We developed drought intensity–duration–frequency curves using physical indicators, the deficit in precipitation and streamflow, for a more straightforward interpretation. Tests with the observed major droughts in two climatologically different catchments confirmed the practical applicability of the curves under drought conditions.
Valérie Jean, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Anissa Frini, and Dominic Roussel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3351–3373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3351-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3351-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Flood forecasts are only useful if they are understood correctly. They are also uncertain, and it is difficult to present all of the information about the forecast and its uncertainty on a map, as it is three dimensional (water depth and extent, in all directions). To overcome this, we interviewed 139 people to understand their preferences in terms of forecast visualization. We propose simple and effective ways of presenting flood forecast maps so that they can be understood and useful.
Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2301–2317, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We conducted a systematic literature review of socio-hydrological studies applied to natural hazards and disaster research. Results indicate that there is a wide range of understanding of what
socialmeans in socio-hydrology, and monodisciplinary studies prevail. We expect to encourage socio-hydrologists to investigate different disasters using a more integrative approach that combines natural and social sciences tools by involving stakeholders and broadening the use of mixed methods.
Leon M. Hermans, Vishal Narain, Remi Kempers, Sharlene L. Gomes, Poulomi Banerjee, Rezaul Hasan, Mashfiqus Salehin, Shah Alam Khan, A. T. M. Zakir Hossain, Kazi Faisal Islam, Sheikh Nazmul Huda, Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Binoy Majumder, Soma Majumder, and Wil A. H. Thissen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2201–2219, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Transdisciplinary water research involves the co-creation of knowledge between various stakeholders to advance science and resolve complex societal problems. In this paper, we describe challenges and responses to address power and politics as part of transdisciplinary research. This is done based on a project that combined known principles for transdisciplinary research with a negotiated approach to support groundwater management in peri-urban villages in India and Bangladesh.
Yongping Wei, Jing Wei, Gen Li, Shuanglei Wu, David Yu, Mohammad Ghoreishi, You Lu, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Murugesu Sivapalan, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2131–2146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2131-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2131-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
There is increasing tension among the riparian countries of transboundary rivers. This article proposes a socio-hydrological framework that incorporates the slow and less visible societal processes into existing hydro-economic models, revealing the slow and hidden feedbacks between societal and hydrological processes. This framework will contribute to process-based understanding of the complex mechanism that drives conflict and cooperation in transboundary river management.
John Conallin, Nathan Ning, Jennifer Bond, Nicholas Pawsey, Lee J. Baumgartner, Dwi Atminarso, Hannah McPherson, Wayne Robinson, and Garry Thorncraft
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1357–1370, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1357-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1357-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Implementation failure is well known to be a major barrier to the success of water resource plans and policies. The motivations and abilities (MOTA) approach attempts to address this barrier, by providing a multi-stakeholder, multilevel tool to assess triggers, motivations and abilities supporting the implementation feasibility of plans. We review existing MOTA applications in various water management contexts and propose several complementary add-in applications to complement the approach.
Gopal Penny, Diogo Bolster, and Marc F. Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1187–1202, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1187-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1187-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In residential areas with a high housing density, septic contamination of private wells raises multiple health concerns. Often, few regulations exist to ensure good water quality in such systems, and water quality is often left to the homeowner. To address the potential obstacles to effective management, we identify situations where misplaced economic incentives hinder effective policy to support water quality in such systems.
Jonatan Godinez Madrigal, Nora Van Cauwenbergh, Jaime Hoogesteger, Pamela Claure Gutierrez, and Pieter van der
Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 885–902, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-885-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-885-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Urban water systems are facing an increasing pressure on their water resources to guarantee safe and sufficient water access. Water managers often use tried and tested strategies like large supply augmentation infrastructure to address water problems. However, these projects do not address key problems and cause water conflicts. We conducted transdisciplinary research to show how water conflicts can change the development pathway of urban water systems by implementing alternative solutions.
Shuanglei Wu, Yongping Wei, and Xuemei Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5381–5398, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5381-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5381-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using publications indexed in the Web of Science, we investigated water resources knowledge development at the river basin scale since 1900 and found that legacy-driven knowledge structures, increasingly homogenized management issues, and largely static cross-disciplinary collaborations dominated highly researched river basins. A structural shift of water resources knowledge development to cope with the rapidly changing hydrological systems and associated management issues is urgently needed.
Guang Yang and Paul Block
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3617–3634, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3617-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3617-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
There is a clear trade-off between reservoir hydropower generation and the variability in reservoir water release, which can be used to derive water-sharing policies and provide critical insights during riparian negotiations regarding downstream flows supplementing during drought conditions. This type of water-sharing policy can effectively mitigate the water use conflicts between upstream and downstream countries, especially during drought periods.
Leandro Carlos Sgroi, Miguel Angel Lovino, Ernesto Hugo Berbery, and Gabriela Viviana Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2475–2490, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2475-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2475-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study advances the understanding and impacts of drought on wheat, corn, and soybean yields over Argentina's main crop region, where crop production is more intense and represents the main contribution to the country's gross domestic product. Our analysis focuses on drought properties, including the magnitude, frequency at different timescales, duration, and severity. This new approach can be helpful for regional decision-making and planning by water managers and in agricultural contexts.
Iman Haqiqi, Danielle S. Grogan, Thomas W. Hertel, and Wolfram Schlenker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 551–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-551-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-551-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study combines a fine-scale weather product with outputs of a hydrological model to construct functional metrics of individual and compound hydroclimatic extremes for agriculture. Then, a yield response function is estimated with individual and compound metrics focusing on corn in the United States during the 1981–2015 period. The findings suggest that metrics of compound hydroclimatic extremes are better predictors of corn yield variations than metrics of individual extremes.
Anna L. Flack, Anthony S. Kiem, Tessa R. Vance, Carly R. Tozer, and Jason L. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5699–5712, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Palaeoclimate information was analysed for eastern Australia to determine when (and where) there was agreement about the timing of wet and dry epochs in the pre-instrumental period (1000–1899). The results show that instrumental records (~1900–present) underestimate the full range of rainfall variability that has occurred. When coupled with projected impacts of climate change and growing demands, these results highlight major challenges for water resource management and infrastructure.
Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Nora Van Cauwenbergh, and Pieter van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4903–4921, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our research studies whether science depoliticizes water conflicts or instead conflicts politicize science–policy processes. We analyze a water conflict due to the development of large infrastructure. We interviewed key actors in the conflict and replicated the results of water resources models developed to solve the conflict. We found that knowledge produced in isolation has no positive effect in transforming the conflict; instead, its potential could be enhanced if produced collaboratively.
Sang-Hyun Lee, Amjad T. Assi, Bassel Daher, Fatima E. Mengoub, and Rabi H. Mohtar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4727–4741, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Proper water availability for the right place and time in a changing climate requires analysis of complex scientific, technical, socioeconomic, regulatory, and political issues. A Water-Energy-Food Nexus Phosphate (WEF-P) Tool, based on integrating supply chain processes, transportation, and water–energy footprints could assess the various scenarios to offer an effective means of ensuring sustainable management of limited resources to both agricultural areas and the phosphate industry.
Jared D. Wolfe, Kevin R. Shook, Chris Spence, and Colin J. Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3945–3967, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Watershed classification can identify regions expected to respond similarly to disturbance. Methods should extend beyond hydrology to include other environmental questions, such as ecology and water quality. We developed a classification for the Canadian Prairie and identified seven classes defined by watershed characteristics, including elevation, climate, wetland density, and surficial geology. Results provide a basis for evaluating watershed response to land management and climate condition.
Arvid Bring and Steve W. Lyon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2369–2378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrology education strives to teach students both quantitative ability and complex professional skills. Our research shows that role-play simulations are useful to make students able to integrate various analytical skills in complicated settings while not interfering with traditional teaching that fosters their ability to solve mathematical problems. Despite this there are several potential challenging areas in using role-plays, and we therefore suggest ways around these potential roadblocks.
Jin-Young Hyun, Shih-Yu Huang, Yi-Chen Ethan Yang, Vincent Tidwell, and Jordan Macknick
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2261–2278, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study applies a two-way coupled agent-based model (ABM) with a river-reservoir management model (RiverWare) to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions using the Bayesian inference mapping joined with the cost–loss model. The calibration results capture the dynamics of historical irrigated area and streamflow changes and suggest that the proposed framework improves the representation of human decision-making processes compared to conventional rule-based ABMs.
Henning Lebrenz and András Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1633–1648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Many variables, e.g., in hydrology, geology, and social sciences, are only observed at a few distinct measurement locations, and their actual distribution in the entire space remains unknown. We introduce the new geostatistical interpolation method of
quantile kriging, providing an improved estimator and associated uncertainty. It can also host variables, which would not fulfill the implicit presumptions of the traditional geostatistical interpolation methods.
Gemma J. Venhuizen, Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Cathelijne R. Stoof, and Ionica Smeets
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Do experts attach the same meaning as laypeople to terms often used in hydrology such as "river", "flooding" and "downstream"? In this study a survey was completed by 34 experts and 119 laypeople to answer this question. We found that there are some profound differences between experts and laypeople: words like "river" and "river basin" turn out to have a different interpretation between the two groups. However, when using pictures there is much more agreement between the groups.
James O. Knighton, Osamu Tsuda, Rebecca Elliott, and M. Todd Walter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5657–5673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Decision-making for flood risk management is often the collective effort of professionals within government, NGOs, private practice, and advocacy groups. Our research investigates differences among flood experts within Tompkins County, New York (USA). We explore how they differ in their perceptions of flooding risk, desired project outcomes, and knowledge. We observe substantial differences among experts, and recommend formally acknowledging these perceptions when engaging in flood management.
Md Ruknul Ferdous, Anna Wesselink, Luigia Brandimarte, Kymo Slager, Margreet Zwarteveen, and Giuliano Di Baldassarre
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5159–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Socio-hydrological space (SHS) is a concept that enriches the study of socio-hydrology because it helps understand the detailed human–water interactions in a specific location. The concept suggests that the interactions between society and water are place-bound because of differences in social processes and river dynamics. This would be useful for developing interventions under disaster management, but also other development goals. SHS provides a new way of looking at socio-hydrological systems.
Xiao-Bo Luan, Ya-Li Yin, Pu-Te Wu, Shi-Kun Sun, Yu-Bao Wang, Xue-Rui Gao, and Jing Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5111–5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
At present, the water footprint calculated by the quantitative method of crop production water footprint is only a field-scale water footprint, which does not contain all the water consumption of the crop growth process, so its calculated crop production water footprint is incomplete. In this study, the hydrological model SWAT was used to analyze the real water consumption in the course of crop growth, so that the actual water consumption of the crops could be more accurately reflected.
Hafsa Ahmed Munia, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Naho Mirumachi, Yoshihide Wada, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2795–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
An analytical framework is developed drawing on ideas of regime shifts from resilience literature to understand the transition between cases where water scarcity is or is not experienced depending on whether water from upstream is or is not available. The analysis shows 386 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible stress and 306 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible shortage. This provides insights into implications for negotiations between sub-basins.
Erik Mostert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 317–329, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper argues for an alternative approach for socio‒hydrology: detailed case study research. Detailed case study research can increase understanding of how society interacts with hydrology, offers more levers for management than coupled modelling, and facilitates interdisciplinary cooperation. The paper presents a case study of the Dommel Basin in the Netherlands and Belgium and compares this with a published model of the Kissimmee Basin in Florida.
Feng Mao, Julian Clark, Timothy Karpouzoglou, Art Dewulf, Wouter Buytaert, and David Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3655–3670, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and analytical assessment of resilience in socio-hydrological contexts. We identify three framings of resilience for different human–water couplings, which have distinct application fields and are used for different water management challenges. To assess and improve socio-hydrological resilience in each type, we introduce a
resilience canvasas a heuristic tool to design bespoke management strategies.
Songjun Han, Fuqiang Tian, Ye Liu, and Xianhui Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3619–3633, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The history of the co-evolution of the coupled human–groundwater system in Cangzhou (a region with the most serious depression cone in the North China Plain) is analyzed with a particular focus on how the groundwater crisis unfolded and how people attempted to settle the crisis. The evolution of the system was substantially impacted by two droughts. Further restoration of groundwater environment could be anticipated, but the occurrence of drought still remains an undetermined external forcing.
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana and Maurits Willem Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.
Rolf Hut, Anne M. Land-Zandstra, Ionica Smeets, and Cathelijne R. Stoof
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2507–2518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
To help geo-scientists prepare for TV appearances, we review the scientific literature on effective science communication related to TV. We identify six main themes: scientist motivation, target audience, narratives and storytelling, jargon and information transfer, relationship between scientists and journalists, and stereotypes of scientists on TV. We provide a detailed case study as illustration for each theme.
Hazel Gibson, Iain S. Stewart, Sabine Pahl, and Alison Stokes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1737–1749, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides empirical evidence for the value of using a psychology-based approach to communication of hydrology and hazards. It demonstrates the use of the "mental models" approach to risk assessment used in a regional geoscience context to explore the conceptions of the geological subsurface between experts and non-experts, and how that impacts on communication.
J. F. Schyns, A. Y. Hoekstra, and M. J. Booij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4581–4608, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The paper draws attention to the fact that green water (soil moisture returning to the atmosphere through evaporation) is a scarce resource, because its availability is limited and there are competing demands for green water. Around 80 indicators of green water availability and scarcity are reviewed and classified based on their scope and purpose of measurement. This is useful in order to properly include limitations in green water availability in water scarcity assessments.
S. Zhou, Y. Huang, Y. Wei, and G. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3715–3726, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, 2015
V. Ernstsen, P. Olsen, and A. E. Rosenbom
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3475–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, 2015
M. J. Halverson and S. W. Fleming
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3301–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, 2015
A. F. Van Loon, S. W. Ploum, J. Parajka, A. K. Fleig, E. Garnier, G. Laaha, and H. A. J. Van Lanen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1993–2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological drought types in cold climates have complex causing factors and impacts. In Austria and Norway, a lack of snowmelt is mainly related to below-normal winter precipitation, and a lack of glaciermelt is mainly related to below-normal summer temperature. These and other hydrological drought types impacted hydropower production, water supply, and agriculture in Europe and the US in the recent and far past. For selected drought events in Norway impacts could be coupled to causing factors.
A. Fernald, S. Guldan, K. Boykin, A. Cibils, M. Gonzales, B. Hurd, S. Lopez, C. Ochoa, M. Ortiz, J. Rivera, S. Rodriguez, and C. Steele
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 293–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, 2015
X. C. Cao, P. T. Wu, Y. B. Wang, and X. N. Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3165–3178, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, 2014
K. Madani, M. Zarezadeh, and S. Morid
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3055–3068, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, 2014
J. Chenoweth, M. Hadjikakou, and C. Zoumides
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2325–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, 2014
S. Pande and M. Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1745–1760, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, 2014
P. Gober and H. S. Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1413–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, 2014
H. Chang, P. Thiers, N. R. Netusil, J. A. Yeakley, G. Rollwagen-Bollens, S. M. Bollens, and S. Singh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1383–1395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, 2014
M. W. Ertsen, J. T. Murphy, L. E. Purdue, and T. Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1369–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, 2014
Y. Liu, F. Tian, H. Hu, and M. Sivapalan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289–1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, 2014
S. N. Lane
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014
H. H. G. Savenije, A. Y. Hoekstra, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 319–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, 2014
A. Wutich, A. C. White, D. D. White, K. L. Larson, A. Brewis, and C. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 109–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, 2014
J. L. Jr. Wescoat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4759–4768, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for Arizona Water Company – Apache Junction, Report Number: 56-002000.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011a.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Second Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for City of Avondale, Report Number: 56-002003.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011b.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for Town of Buckeye, Report Number: 56-002006.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011c.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for City of Chandler, Report Number: 56-002009.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011d.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for Town of Gilbert, Report Number: 56-002017.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011e.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for City of Glendale, Report Number: 56-002018.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011f.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for City of Goodyear, Report Number: 56-002019.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011g.
Arizona Department Of Water Resources: Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages. Notification for City of Mesa, Report Number: 56-002023.00, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011h.
Arizona Department of Water Resources: Second Notification of 2009 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) and Lost and Unaccounted (LandU) for Water Percentages, Notification for City of Peoria, Report Number: 56-002029.000, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, AZ, 2011i.
Arnold, C. A.: Is Wet Growth Smarter than Smart Growth?: The Fragmentation and Integration of Land Use and Water, ELR, 35, 10152–10178, 2005.
Bae, J. and Dall'Erba, S.: Crop production, export of virtual water and water-saving strategies in Arizona, Ecol. Econ., 146, 148–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.018, 2018.
Bates, S.: Bridging the Governance Gap: Emerging Strategies to Integrate Water and Land Use Planning, Nat. Resour. J., 61, 52, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol52/iss1/3 (last access: 23 January 2013), 2012.
Berg, S.: Water Utility Benchmarking: Measurement, Methodologies and Performance Incentives, London, IWA Publishing, ISBN 9781780401690, https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780401690, 2010.
Blackhurst, B. Y. M., Hendrickson, C., and Vidal, J. S. I.: Direct and indirect water withdrawals for U.S. industrial sectors, J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 2126–2130, https://doi.org/10.1021/es903147k, 2010.
Borrego-Marín, M. M., Gutiérrez-Martín, C., and Berbel, J.: Estimation of cost recovery ratio for water services based on the system of environmental-economic accounting for water, Water Resour. Manag., 30, 767–783, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1189-2, 2016.
City of Chandler: Annual Budget 2008–09, http://www.chandlz.gov/content/2008_09AnnualReport.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2008.
City of Chandler: Arizona General Plan, http://www.chandlz.gov/gov/ChandlerGenlPlan.pdf (last access: 10 September 2012), 2009.
City of Glendale: Schedule 5: Expenditure Limitation and Property Tax Rate, http://www.glendaleaz.com/budget/AnnualBudgetBooks.cfm (last access: 12 August 2012), 2008.
City of Goodyear: 2007–2008 Annual Budget, http://www.goodyearaz.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/4267 (last access: 12 August 2012), 2007.
City of Mesa: Final Budget for Fiscal Year Ending 2008, http://www.mesaaz.gov/budget/Documents/FY_03_09/Reso_9002_Budget_07_08.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2008.
City of Peoria: Annual Program Budget – Fiscal Year 2007, http://www.peoriaaz.gov/uploadedFiles/Peoriaaz/Departments/Budget/Historical_Budget_Books/FY2007AnnualProgramBook.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2007.
City of Phoenix: Arizona Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Financial Year 2007, http://phoenix.gov/webcms/groups/internet/@inter/@gov/@fin/@plan/documents/web_content/080342.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2007.
City of Scottsdale: Arizona Adopted Financial Year 2007/08 Budget, http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/Assets/Public+Website/finance/Archive/FY+2007-08/FY+2007-08+Volume+1+Budget+Summary.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2008.
City of Tempe Annual Budget – 1 July 2007 through 30 June 2008: http://www.tempe.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=631 (last access: 12 August 2012), 2007.
Devineni, N., Lall, U., Etienne, E., Shi, D., and Xi, C.: “America's water risk: Current demand and climate variability”, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2285–2293, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063487, 2015.
Evenson, E. J., Jones, S. A., Barber, N. L., Barlow, P. M., Blodgett, D. L., Bruce, B. W., Douglas-Mankin, K., Farmer, W. H., Fischer, J. M., Hughes, W. B., Kennen, J. G., Kiang, J. E., Maupin, M. A., Reeves, H. W., Senay, G. B., Stanton, J. S., Wagner, C. R., and Wilson, J. T.: Continuing progress toward a national assessment of water availability and use, Circ. U. S. Geol. Surv., 1440, 64, 36–37, https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1440, 2018.
Gleick, P. H. and Palaniappan, M.: Peak water limits to freshwater withdrawal and use, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11155–11162, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004812107, 2010.
Gober, P., Kirkwood, C. W., Balling Jr., R. C., Ellis, A. W., and Deitrick, S.: Water planning under climatic uncertainty in Phoenix: Why we need a new paradigm, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 100, 356–372, https://doi.org/10.1080/00045601003595420, 2010.
Gober, P., Larson, K. L., Quay, R., Polsky, C., Chang, H., and Shandas, V.: Why Land Planners and Water Managers Don't Talk to One Another and Why They Should!, Soc. Nat. Resour., 26, 356–364, https://https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.713448, 2013.
Haider, H., Sadiq, R., and Tesfamariam, S.: Inter-Utility Performance Benchmarking Model for Small-to-Medium-Sized Water Utilities: Aggregated Performance Indices, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., 142, 04015039, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000552, 2016.
Hamdy, A., Ragab, R., and Scarascia-Mugnozza, E., Coping with water scarcity: water saving and increasing water productivity, Irrig. Drain., 52, 3–20, 2003.
Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., and Mekonnen, M. M.: The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard, London, Earthscan, ISBN 978-1-84971-279-8, 2011.
Hoekstra, A. Y.: Sustainable, efficient, and equitable water use: The three pillars under wise freshwater allocation, Wires Rev. Water, 1, 31–40, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1000, 2014.
Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., and Zhang, G.: Water footprints and sustainable water allocation, Sustainability, 8, 20, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010020, 2015.
Holway, J. M.: Urban growth and water supply, in: Arizona water policy, Routledge, 157–172, ISBN 1933115343, 2007.
Howe, C. W. and Goemans, C.: The simple analytics of demand hardening, J. Am. Water Work. Assoc., 99, 24–25, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2007.tb08052.x, 2007.
Hubler, D. K., Baygents, J. C., Mackay, C., and Megdal, S. B.: Evaluating economic effects of semiconductor manufacturing in water-limited regions, J. Am. Water Work. Assoc., 104, E100–E106, https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0024, 2012.
Jacobs, K. and Megdal, S.: Water management in the active management areas, Arizona's Water Future: Challenges and Opportunities Background Report, 71–94, https://aztownhall.org/resources/Documents/85 Arizona's Water Future - Challenges and Opportunities Final Report.pdf (last access: 8 February 2024), 2004.
Kijne, J. W., Barker, R., and Molden, D.: Improving water productivity in agriculture: editors’ overview, in: Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement, edited by: Kijne, J. W., Barker, R., and Molden, D., Wallingford, UK, CABI, Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 1, xi–xix, https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65268, 2003.
Kumar, M. D. (Ed.): Conceptual issues in water use efficiency and water productivity, Water Productivity and Food Security: Global Trends and Regional Patterns, 49–61, Netherlands, Elsevier Science, ISBN 9780323914512, 2021.
Larson, K. L., Polsky, C., Gober, P., Chang, H. and Shandas, V.: Vulnerability of Water Systems to the Effects of Climate Change and Urbanization: A Comparison of Phoenix, Arizona and Portland, Oregon (USA), Environ. Manage., 52, 179–195, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0072-2, 2013.
Li, E., Li, S., and Endter-Wada, J.: Water-smart growth planning: linking water and land in the arid urbanizing American West, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 60, 1056–1072, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1197106, 2016.
Maricopa County: Tax Levy and rates https://www.maricopa.gov/5160/Tax-Levy-and-Rates (last access: 11 August 2012), 2009.
Marston, L. and Cai, X.: An overview of water reallocation and the barriers to its implementation, Wires Rev. Water, 3, 658–677, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1159, 2016.
Marston, L., Ao, Y., Konar, M., Mekonnen, M. M., and Hoekstra, A. Y.: High-resolution water footprints of production of the United States, Water Resour. Res., 54, 2288–2316, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021923, 2018.
Marston, L. T., Lamsal, G., Ancona, Z. H., Caldwell, P., Richter, B. D., Ruddell, B. L., Rushforth, R. R., and Davis, K. F.: Reducing water scarcity by improving water productivity in the United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 094033, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9d39, 2020.
Maupin, M. A., Kenny, J. F., Hutson, S. S., Lovelace, J. K., Barber, N. L., and Linsey, K. S.: Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2010, Circular 1405, USGS Circular 1405, http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1405/ (last access: 8 February 2024), 2014.
Mayer, A., Mubako, S., and Ruddell, B. L.: Developing the greatest Blue Economy: Water productivity, freshwater depletion, and virtual water trade in the Great Lakes basin, Earth's Future, 4, 282–297, 2016.
Paterson, W. Rushforth, R., Ruddell, B. L., Ikechukwu, C., Gironás, J., Konar, M., Mijic, A., and Mejia, A.: Water Footprint of Cities: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research, Sustainability, 7, 8461–8490, https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078461, 2015.
Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C., and Ehrlich, P. R.: Human appropriation of renewable fresh water, Science, 271, 785–787, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5250.785, 1996.
Richter, B. D., Benoit, K., Dugan, J., Getacho, G., LaRoe, N., Moro, B., Rynne, T., Tahamtani, M., and Townsend, A.: Decoupling Urban Water Use and Growth in Response to Water Scarcity, Water, 12, 2868, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102868, 2020.
Ruddell, B. L.: HESS Opinions: How should a future water census address consumptive use? (And where can we substitute withdrawal data while we wait?), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5551–5558, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5551-2018, 2018.
Ruddell, B. L., Adams, E. A., Rushforth, R., and Tidwell, V. C.: Embedded resource accounting for coupled natural-human systems: An application to water resource impacts of the western US electrical energy trade, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7957–7972, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014531, 2014.
Rushforth, R. R., Adams, E. A., and Ruddell, B. L.: Generalizing ecological, water and carbon footprint methods and their worldview assumptions using Embedded Resource Accounting, Water Resour. Ind., 1, 77–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2013.05.001, 2013.
Rushforth, R. R. and Ruddell, B. L.: The hydro-economic interdependency of cities: Virtual water connections of the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area, Sustainability, 7, 8522–8547, https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078522, 2015.
Rushforth, R. R. and Ruddell, B. L.: The vulnerability and resilience of a city's water footprint: The case of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, Water Resour. Res., 52, 2698–2714, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018006S, 2016.
Rushforth, R. R. and Ruddell, B. L.: A spatially detailed blue water footprint of the United States economy, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3007–3032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3007-2018, 2018.
Rushforth, R. R., Messerschmidt, M., and Ruddell, B. L.: A Systems Approach to Municipal Water Portfolio Security: A Case Study of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area, Water, 12, 1663, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061663, 2020.
Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M., Colón-González, F. J., Gosling, S. N., Kim, H., Liu, X., Masaki, Y., Portmann, F. T., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Tang, Q., Wada, Y., Wisser, D., Albrecht, T., Frieler, K., Piontek, F., Warszawski, L., and Kabat, P.: Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 111, 3245–3250, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110S, 2014.
Scott, C. A. and Pasqualetti, M. J.: Energy and water resources scarcity: Critical infrastructure for growth and economic development in Arizona and Sonora, Nat. Resour. J., 50, 645–682, 2010.
Solley, W. B., Chase, E. B., and Mann IV, W. B.: Estimated use of water in the United States in 1980, USGS Circular 1001, https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1001, 1983.
Town of Avondale: Annual Budget and Financial Plan – Fiscal Year 2010–2011, http://www.avondale.org/documents/22/54/56/Avondale Budget Document INet.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2010.
Town of Buckeye: Arizona Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2007/08, http://www.buckeyeaz.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/490 (last access: 12 August 2012), 2007.
Town of Gilbert: Summary Schedule of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures/Expenses, Fiscal Year 2007–08, http://www.gilbertaz.gov/budget/pdf/schedule/FY08 Gilbert Official CandT Budget Schedule A.pdf (last access: 12 August 2012), 2008.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis: https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gdp-county-metro-and-other-areas (last access: 8 February 2024), 2019.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, All sectors: Geographic Area Series: Economy-Wide Key Statistics, http://factfinder2.census.gov (last access: 11 August 2012, now: Economic Census 2017, 2012, 2007, 2002, https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/economic-census.2007.html (last access: 8 February 2024), 2007.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, Selected Economic Characteristics: 2005–2009, https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.2009.html#list-tab-1806015614 (last access: 11 August 2012), 2009a.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, Selected Housing Characteristics: 2005–2009, https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.2009.html#list-tab-1806015614 (last access: 11 August 2012), 2009b.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates: 2005–2009, https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.2009.html#list-tab-1806015614 (last access: 11 August 2012), 2009c.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, Mean Income in the Past 12 Months (In 2009 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars), https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.2009.html#list-tab-1806015614 (last access: 11 August 2012), 2009d.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, Median Income in the Past 12 Months (In 2009 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars), https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.2009.html#list-tab-1806015614 (last access: 12 August 2012), 2009e.
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey, Financial Characteristics, https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.2009.html#list-tab-1806015614 (last access: 12 August 2012), 2009f.
U.S. Census Bureau: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/pop-estimates-county-metro.html (last access: 8 February 2024), 2020.
Vardon, M., Martinez-Lagunes, R., Gan, H., and Nagy, M.: The system of environmental-economic accounting for water: development, implementation, and use, Water Accounting, International Approaches to Policy and Decision Making, 32–57, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849807500.00010, 2012.
Vörösmarty, C. J.: Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth, Science, 289, 284–288, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.284, 2000.
Wildman Jr., R. A. and Forde, N. A.: Management of water shortage in the Colorado river basin: Evaluating current policy and the viability of interstate water trading, JAWRA, 48, 411–422, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00665.x, 2012.
Xu, Z., Chen, X., Wu, S. R., Gong, M., Du, Y., Wang, J., Li, Y. and Liu, J.: Spatial-temporal assessment of water footprint, water scarcity and crop water productivity in a major crop production region, J. Clean. Prod., 224, 375–383, 2019.
Short summary
This study finds that bedroom cities show higher water productivity based on the standard efficiency benchmark of gallons per capita, but core cities that host large businesses show higher water productivity using a basket of economic values like taxes, payroll, and business revenues. Using a broader basket of water productivity benchmarks that consider more of the community’s socio-economic values and goals could inform more balanced and equitable water allocation decisions by policymakers.
This study finds that bedroom cities show higher water productivity based on the standard...
