Articles | Volume 26, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3497-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note: Analyzing river network dynamics and the active length–discharge relationship using water presence sensors
Related authors
Cited articles
Acuna, V. and Tockner, K.: The effects of alterations in temperature and flow regime on organic carbon dynamics in Mediterranean river networks, Global
Change Biol., 16, 2638–2650, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02170.x, 2010. a
Acuna, V., Datry, T., Marshall, J., Barcelò, D., Dahm, C. N., and Ginebreda, A. E. A.: Why should we care about temporary waterways?, Science, 343, 1080–1081, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246666, 2014. a
Adams, E. A., Monroe, S. A., Springer, A. E., Blasch, K. W., and Bills, D. J.: Electrical resistance sensors record spring flow timing, Grand Canyon,
Arizona, Ground Water, 44, 630–641, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00223.x, 2006. a
Assendelft, R. S. and vanMeerveld, H. J. I.: A low-cost, multi-sensor system
to monitor temporary stream dynamics in mountainous headwater catchments,
Sensors, 19, 4645, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214645, 2019. a, b
Bhamjee, R. and Lindsay, J. B.: Ephemeral stream sensor design using state loggers, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1009–1021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1009-2011, 2011. a