Articles | Volume 25, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
15 Nov 2021
Research article |
| 15 Nov 2021
| 15 Nov 2021
Evaluating different machine learning methods to simulate runoff from extensive green roofs
Elhadi Mohsen Hassan Abdalla
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7031, Norway
Vincent Pons
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7031, Norway
Virginia Stovin
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Simon De-Ville
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Elizabeth Fassman-Beck
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA
Knut Alfredsen
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7031, Norway
Tone Merete Muthanna
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7031, Norway
Related authors
No articles found.
Vincent Pons, Rasmus Benestad, Edvard Sivertsen, Tone Merete Muthanna, and Jean-Luc Bertrand-Krajewski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2855–2874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Different models were developed to increase the temporal resolution of precipitation time series to minutes. Their applicability under climate change and their suitability for producing input time series for green infrastructure (e.g. green roofs) modelling were evaluated. The robustness of the model was validated against a range of European climates in eight locations in France and Norway. The future hydrological performances of green roofs were evaluated in order to improve design practice.
Aynalem T. Tsegaw, Marie Pontoppidan, Erle Kristvik, Knut Alfredsen, and Tone M. Muthanna
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2133–2155, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2133-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2133-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological impacts of climate change are generally performed by following steps from global to regional climate modeling through data tailoring and hydrological modeling. Usually, the climate–hydrology chain primary focuses on medium to large catchments. To study impacts of climate change on small catchments, a high-resolution regional climate model and hydrological model are required. The results from high-resolution models help in proposing specific adaptation strategies for impacts.
Kuganesan Sivasubramaniam, Ashish Sharma, and Knut Alfredsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6533–6546, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6533-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6533-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the use of gauge precipitation and air temperature observations to ascertain radar precipitation in cold climates. The use of air temperature as an additional variable in a non-parametric model improved the estimation of radar precipitation significantly. Further, it was found that the temperature effects became insignificant when air temperature was above 10 °C. The findings from this study could be important for using radar precipitation for hydrological applications.
Knut Alfredsen, Christian Haas, Jeffrey A. Tuhtan, and Peggy Zinke
The Cryosphere, 12, 627–633, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-627-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-627-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The formation and breakup of ice on rivers in winter may have impacts on everything from built infrastructure to river ecology. Collecting data on river ice is challenging both technically and because since access to the ice may not always be safe. Here we use a low cost drone to map river ice using aerial imagery and a photogrammetry. Through this we can assess ice volumes, ice extent and ice formation and how ice can affect processes in the river and the utilisation of rivers in winter.
Kuganesan Sivasubramaniam, Ashish Sharma, and Knut Alfredsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-662, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-662, 2017
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
In cold climates, the form of precipitation (rain or snow) results in uncertainty in radar precipitation estimation. This study assesses the relevance of air temperature as an additional factor in deriving radar precipitation. The results show that radar precipitation depends on air temperature especially for cold regions, and that incorporating air temperature as an additional variable during conversion from reflectivity to rain rate improved the radar precipitation estimates significantly.
A. S. Gragne, A. Sharma, R. Mehrotra, and K. Alfredsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3695–3714, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3695-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3695-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We present a forecasting system comprising additively set-up conceptual and simple error model. Parameters of the conceptual model were left unaltered, as are in most operational set-ups, and the data-driven model was arranged to forecast the corrective measures the conceptual model needs. We demonstrate that the present procedure could effectively improve forecast accuracy over extended lead times with a reliability degree varying inter-annually and inter-seasonally.
S. Gebre, T. Boissy, and K. Alfredsen
The Cryosphere, 8, 1589–1605, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1589-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1589-2014, 2014
T. H. Bakken, Å. Killingtveit, K. Engeland, K. Alfredsen, and A. Harby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3983–4000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Urban Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Combining statistical and hydrodynamic models to assess compound flood hazards from rainfall and storm surge: a case study of Shanghai
An optimized long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach applied to early warning and forecasting of ponding in the urban drainage system
A deep-learning-technique-based data-driven model for accurate and rapid flood predictions in temporal and spatial dimensions
Impact of urban geology on model simulations of shallow groundwater levels and flow paths
Technical note: Modeling spatial fields of extreme precipitation – a hierarchical Bayesian approach
Intersecting near-real time fluvial and pluvial inundation estimates with sociodemographic vulnerability to quantify a household flood impact index
Forecasting green roof detention performance by temporal downscaling of precipitation time-series projections
Modeling and interpreting hydrological responses of sustainable urban drainage systems with explainable machine learning methods
The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood frequency over a small urban watershed: an approach coupling stochastic storm transposition and hydrologic modeling
Space variability impacts on hydrological responses of nature-based solutions and the resulting uncertainty: a case study of Guyancourt (France)
Urban surface water flood modelling – a comprehensive review of current models and future challenges
Resampling and ensemble techniques for improving ANN-based high-flow forecast accuracy
Event selection and two-stage approach for calibrating models of green urban drainage systems
Modeling the high-resolution dynamic exposure to flooding in a city region
Drainage area characterization for evaluating green infrastructure using the Storm Water Management Model
Critical scales to explain urban hydrological response: an application in Cranbrook, London
Increase in flood risk resulting from climate change in a developed urban watershed – the role of storm temporal patterns
Patterns and comparisons of human-induced changes in river flood impacts in cities
Scale effect challenges in urban hydrology highlighted with a distributed hydrological model
Comparison of the impacts of urban development and climate change on exposing European cities to pluvial flooding
Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and their effects on hydrological response in urban areas – a review
Hydrodynamics of pedestrians' instability in floodwaters
Formulating and testing a method for perturbing precipitation time series to reflect anticipated climatic changes
Using rainfall thresholds and ensemble precipitation forecasts to issue and improve urban inundation alerts
Enhancing the T-shaped learning profile when teaching hydrology using data, modeling, and visualization activities
On the sensitivity of urban hydrodynamic modelling to rainfall spatial and temporal resolution
Precipitation variability within an urban monitoring network via microcanonical cascade generators
Estimation of peak discharges of historical floods
Indirect downscaling of hourly precipitation based on atmospheric circulation and temperature
Assessing the hydrologic restoration of an urbanized area via an integrated distributed hydrological model
Using the Storm Water Management Model to predict urban headwater stream hydrological response to climate and land cover change
Evaluating scale and roughness effects in urban flood modelling using terrestrial LIDAR data
Contribution of directly connected and isolated impervious areas to urban drainage network hydrographs
Thermal management of an unconsolidated shallow urban groundwater body
Online multistep-ahead inundation depth forecasts by recurrent NARX networks
A statistical analysis of insurance damage claims related to rainfall extremes
Joint impact of rainfall and tidal level on flood risk in a coastal city with a complex river network: a case study of Fuzhou City, China
Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam
Multi-objective optimization for combined quality–quantity urban runoff control
Development of flood probability charts for urban drainage network in coastal areas through a simplified joint assessment approach
Auto-control of pumping operations in sewerage systems by rule-based fuzzy neural networks
Coupling urban event-based and catchment continuous modelling for combined sewer overflow river impact assessment
Dynamic neural networks for real-time water level predictions of sewerage systems-covering gauged and ungauged sites
Hanqing Xu, Elisa Ragno, Sebastiaan N. Jonkman, Jun Wang, Jeremy D. Bricker, Zhan Tian, and Laixiang Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3919–3930, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3919-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A coupled statistical–hydrodynamic model framework is employed to quantitatively evaluate the sensitivity of compound flood hazards to the relative timing of peak storm surges and rainfall. The findings reveal that the timing difference between these two factors significantly affects flood inundation depth and extent. The most severe inundation occurs when rainfall precedes the storm surge peak by 2 h.
Wen Zhu, Tao Tao, Hexiang Yan, Jieru Yan, Jiaying Wang, Shuping Li, and Kunlun Xin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2035–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2035-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2035-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To provide a possibility for early warning and forecasting of ponding in the urban drainage system, an optimized long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model is proposed in this paper. It has a remarkable improvement compared to the models based on LSTM and convolutional neural network (CNN) structures. The performance of the corrected model is reliable if the number of monitoring sites is over one per hectare. Increasing the number of monitoring points further has little impact on the performance.
Qianqian Zhou, Shuai Teng, Zuxiang Situ, Xiaoting Liao, Junman Feng, Gongfa Chen, Jianliang Zhang, and Zonglei Lu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1791–1808, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1791-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1791-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A deep-learning-based data-driven model for flood predictions in temporal and spatial dimensions, with the integration of a long short-term memory network, Bayesian optimization, and transfer learning is proposed. The model accurately predicts water depths and flood time series/dynamics for hyetograph inputs, with substantial improvements in computational time. With transfer learning, the model was well applied to a new case study and showed robust compatibility and generalization ability.
Ane LaBianca, Mette H. Mortensen, Peter Sandersen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Karsten H. Jensen, and Jacob Kidmose
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1645–1666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study explores the effect of Anthropocene geology and the computational grid size on the simulation of shallow urban groundwater. Many cities are facing challenges with high groundwater levels close to the surface, yet urban planning and development seldom consider its impact on the groundwater resource. This study illustrates that the urban subsurface infrastructure significantly affects the groundwater flow paths and the residence time of shallow urban groundwater.
Bianca Rahill-Marier, Naresh Devineni, and Upmanu Lall
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5685–5695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new approach to modeling extreme regional rainfall by considering the spatial structure of extreme events. The developed models allow a probabilistic exploration of how the regional drainage network may respond to extreme rainfall events and provide a foundation for how future risks may be better estimated.
Matthew Preisser, Paola Passalacqua, R. Patrick Bixler, and Julian Hofmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3941–3964, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
There is rising concern in numerous fields regarding the inequitable distribution of human risk to floods. The co-occurrence of river and surface flooding is largely excluded from leading flood hazard mapping services, therefore underestimating hazards. Using high-resolution elevation data and a region-specific social vulnerability index, we developed a method to estimate flood impacts at the household level in near-real time.
Vincent Pons, Rasmus Benestad, Edvard Sivertsen, Tone Merete Muthanna, and Jean-Luc Bertrand-Krajewski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2855–2874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Different models were developed to increase the temporal resolution of precipitation time series to minutes. Their applicability under climate change and their suitability for producing input time series for green infrastructure (e.g. green roofs) modelling were evaluated. The robustness of the model was validated against a range of European climates in eight locations in France and Norway. The future hydrological performances of green roofs were evaluated in order to improve design practice.
Yang Yang and Ting Fong May Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5839–5858, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses explainable machine learning methods to model and interpret the statistical correlations between rainfall and the discharge of urban catchments with sustainable urban drainage systems. The resulting models have good prediction accuracies. However, the right predictions may be made for the wrong reasons as the model cannot provide physically plausible explanations as to why a prediction is made.
Zhengzheng Zhou, James A. Smith, Mary Lynn Baeck, Daniel B. Wright, Brianne K. Smith, and Shuguang Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4701–4717, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The role of rainfall space–time structure in flood response is an important research issue in urban hydrology. This study contributes to this understanding in small urban watersheds. Combining stochastically based rainfall scenarios with a hydrological model, the results show the complexities of flood response for various return periods, implying the common assumptions of spatially uniform rainfall in urban flood frequency are problematic, even for relatively small basin scales.
Yangzi Qiu, Igor da Silva Rocha Paz, Feihu Chen, Pierre-Antoine Versini, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3137–3162, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3137-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3137-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Our original research objective is to investigate the uncertainties of the hydrological responses of nature-based solutions (NBSs) that result from the multiscale space variability in both the rainfall and the NBS distribution. Results show that the intersection effects of spatial variability in rainfall and the spatial arrangement of NBS can generate uncertainties of peak flow and total runoff volume estimations in NBS scenarios.
Kaihua Guo, Mingfu Guan, and Dapeng Yu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2843–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a comprehensive review of models and emerging approaches for predicting urban surface water flooding driven by intense rainfall. It explores the advantages and limitations of existing models and identifies major challenges. Issues of model complexities, scale effects, and computational efficiency are also analysed. The results will inform scientists, engineers, and decision-makers of the latest developments and guide the model selection based on desired objectives.
Everett Snieder, Karen Abogadil, and Usman T. Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2543–2566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2543-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2543-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Flow distributions are highly skewed, resulting in low prediction accuracy of high flows when using artificial neural networks for flood forecasting. We investigate the use of resampling and ensemble techniques to address the problem of skewed datasets to improve high flow prediction. The methods are implemented both independently and in combined, hybrid techniques. This research presents the first analysis of the effects of combining these methods on high flow prediction accuracy.
Ico Broekhuizen, Günther Leonhardt, Jiri Marsalek, and Maria Viklander
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 869–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-869-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-869-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Urban drainage models are usually calibrated using a few events so that they accurately represent a real-world site. This paper compares 14 single- and two-stage strategies for selecting these events and found significant variation between them in terms of model performance and the obtained values of model parameters. Calibrating parameters for green and impermeable areas in two separate stages improved model performance in the validation period while making calibration easier and faster.
Xuehong Zhu, Qiang Dai, Dawei Han, Lu Zhuo, Shaonan Zhu, and Shuliang Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3353–3372, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3353-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3353-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Urban flooding exposure is generally investigated with the assumption of stationary disasters and disaster-hit bodies during an event, and thus it cannot satisfy the increasingly elaborate modeling and management of urban floods. In this study, a comprehensive method was proposed to simulate dynamic exposure to urban flooding considering human mobility. Several scenarios, including diverse flooding types and various responses of residents to flooding, were considered.
Joong Gwang Lee, Christopher T. Nietch, and Srinivas Panguluri
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2615–2635, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper demonstrates an approach to spatial discretization for analyzing green infrastructure (GI) using SWMM. Besides DCIA, pervious buffers should be identified for GI modeling. Runoff contributions from different spatial components and flow pathways would impact GI performance. The presented approach can reduce the number of calibration parameters and apply scale–independently to a watershed scale. Hydrograph separation can add insights for developing GI scenarios.
Elena Cristiano, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Santiago Gaitan, Susana Ochoa Rodriguez, and Nick van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2425–2447, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2425-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2425-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we investigate the influence rainfall and catchment scales have on hydrological response. This problem is quite relevant in urban areas, where the response is fast due to the high degree of imperviousness. We presented a new approach to classify rainfall variability in space and time and use this classification to investigate rainfall aggregation effects on urban hydrological response. This classification allows the spatial extension of the main core of the storm to be identified.
Suresh Hettiarachchi, Conrad Wasko, and Ashish Sharma
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2041–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The study examines the impact of higher temperatures expected in a future climate on how rainfall varies with time during severe storm events. The results show that these impacts increase future flood risk in urban environments and that current design guidelines need to be adjusted so that effective adaptation measures can be implemented.
Stephanie Clark, Ashish Sharma, and Scott A. Sisson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1793–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1793-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates global patterns relating urban river flood impacts to socioeconomic development and changing hydrologic conditions, and comparisons are provided between 98 individual cities. This paper condenses and communicates large amounts of information to accelerate the understanding of relationships between local urban conditions and global processes, and to potentially motivate knowledge transfer between decision-makers facing similar circumstances.
Abdellah Ichiba, Auguste Gires, Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia, Daniel Schertzer, Philippe Bompard, and Marie-Claire Ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 331–350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-331-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-331-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper proposes a two-step investigation to illustrate the extent of scale effects in urban hydrology. First, fractal tools are used to highlight the scale dependency observed within GIS data inputted in urban hydrological models. Then an intensive multi-scale modelling work was carried out to confirm effects on model performances. The model was implemented at 17 spatial resolutions ranging from 100 to 5 m. Results allow the understanding of scale challenges in hydrology modelling.
Per Skougaard Kaspersen, Nanna Høegh Ravn, Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Henrik Madsen, and Martin Drews
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4131–4147, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017, 2017
Elena Cristiano, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, and Nick van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3859–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3859-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3859-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In the last decades, new instruments were developed to measure rainfall and hydrological processes at high resolution. Weather radars are used, for example, to measure how rainfall varies in space and time. At the same time, new models were proposed to reproduce and predict hydrological response, in order to prevent flooding in urban areas. This paper presents a review of our current knowledge of rainfall and hydrological processes in urban areas, focusing on their variability in time and space.
Chiara Arrighi, Hocine Oumeraci, and Fabio Castelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 515–531, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-515-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-515-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In developed countries, the majority of fatalities during floods occurs as a consequence of inappropriate high-risk behaviour such as walking or driving in floodwaters. This work addresses pedestrians' instability in floodwaters. It analyses both the contribution of flood and human physical characteristics in the loss of stability highlighting the key role of subject height (submergence) and flow regime. The method consists of a re-analysis of experiments and numerical modelling.
Hjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup, Stylianos Georgiadis, Ida Bülow Gregersen, and Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 345–355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-345-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-345-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we propose a methodology changing present-day precipitation time series to reflect future changed climate. Present-day time series have a much finer resolution than what is provided by climate models and thus have a much broader application range. The proposed methodology is able to replicate most expectations of climate change precipitation. These time series can be used to run fine-scale hydrological and hydraulic models and thereby assess the influence of climate change on them.
Tsun-Hua Yang, Gong-Do Hwang, Chin-Cheng Tsai, and Jui-Yi Ho
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4731–4745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4731-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4731-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Taiwan continues to suffer from floods. This study proposes the integration of rainfall thresholds and ensemble precipitation forecasts to provide probabilistic urban inundation forecasts. Utilization of ensemble precipitation forecasts can extend forecast lead times to 72 h, preceding peak flows and allowing response agencies to take necessary preparatory measures. This study also develops a hybrid of real-time observation and rainfall forecasts to improve the first 24 h inundation forecasts.
Christopher A. Sanchez, Benjamin L. Ruddell, Roy Schiesser, and Venkatesh Merwade
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1289–1299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The use of authentic learning activities is especially important for place-based geosciences like hydrology, where professional breadth and technical depth are critical for practicing hydrologists. The current study found that integrating computerized learning content into the learning experience, using only a simple spreadsheet tool and readily available hydrological data, can effectively bring the "real world" into the classroom and provide an enriching educational experience.
G. Bruni, R. Reinoso, N. C. van de Giesen, F. H. L. R. Clemens, and J. A. E. ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 691–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-691-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-691-2015, 2015
P. Licznar, C. De Michele, and W. Adamowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 485–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-485-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-485-2015, 2015
J. Herget, T. Roggenkamp, and M. Krell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4029–4037, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4029-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4029-2014, 2014
F. Beck and A. Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4851–4863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4851-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4851-2013, 2013
D. H. Trinh and T. F. M. Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4789–4801, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4789-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4789-2013, 2013
J. Y. Wu, J. R. Thompson, R. K. Kolka, K. J. Franz, and T. W. Stewart
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4743–4758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4743-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4743-2013, 2013
H. Ozdemir, C. C. Sampson, G. A. M. de Almeida, and P. D. Bates
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4015–4030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4015-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4015-2013, 2013
Y. Seo, N.-J. Choi, and A. R. Schmidt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3473–3483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3473-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3473-2013, 2013
J. Epting, F. Händel, and P. Huggenberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1851–1869, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1851-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1851-2013, 2013
H.-Y. Shen and L.-C. Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 935–945, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-935-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-935-2013, 2013
M. H. Spekkers, M. Kok, F. H. L. R. Clemens, and J. A. E. ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 913–922, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-913-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-913-2013, 2013
J. J. Lian, K. Xu, and C. Ma
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 679–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-679-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-679-2013, 2013
H. T. L. Huong and A. Pathirana
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 379–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013, 2013
S. Oraei Zare, B. Saghafian, and A. Shamsai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4531–4542, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4531-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4531-2012, 2012
R. Archetti, A. Bolognesi, A. Casadio, and M. Maglionico
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3115–3122, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3115-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3115-2011, 2011
Y.-M. Chiang, L.-C. Chang, M.-J. Tsai, Y.-F. Wang, and F.-J. Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 185–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-185-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-185-2011, 2011
I. Andrés-Doménech, J. C. Múnera, F. Francés, and J. B. Marco
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2057-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2057-2010, 2010
Yen-Ming Chiang, Li-Chiu Chang, Meng-Jung Tsai, Yi-Fung Wang, and Fi-John Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1309–1319, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1309-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1309-2010, 2010
Cited articles
Allaire J. J. and Cholle, F.: keras: R Interface to 'Keras', R package version 2.2.5.0, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=keras (last access: 10 November 2021), 2019. a
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., Smith, M.: Crop
evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO
Irrigation and drainage paper 56, Fao, Rome, 300, D05109, 1998. a
Almorox, J., Quej, V. H., and Martí, P.: Global performance ranking of
temperature-based approaches for evapotranspiration estimation considering
Köppen climate classes, J. Hydrol., 528, 514–522, 2015. a
Bengtsson, L., Grahn, L., and Olsson, J.: Hydrological function of a thin
extensive green roof in southern Sweden, Hydrol. Res., 36, 259–268,
2005. a
Berndtsson, J. C.: Green roof performance towards management of runoff water
quantity and quality: A review, Ecol. Eng., 36, 351–360, 2010. a
Berretta, C., Poë, S., and Stovin, V.: Reprint of “Moisture content
behaviour in extensive green roofs during dry periods: The influence of
vegetation and substrate characteristics”, J. Hydrol., 516,
37–49, 2014. a
Beygelzimer, A., Kakadet, S., Langford, J., Arya, S., Mount, D., Li, S., and
Li, M. S.: Package “FNN”, available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FNN/index.html, last access: 10 November 2021. a
Bhattacharya, B. and Solomatine, D. P.: Neural networks and M5 model trees in
modelling water level–discharge relationship, Neurocomputing, 63, 381–396,
2005. a
Bouzouidja, R., Séré, G., Claverie, R., Ouvrard, S., Nuttens, L., and
Lacroix, D.: Green roof aging: Quantifying the impact of substrate evolution
on hydraulic performances at the lab-scale, J. Hydrol., 564,
416–423, 2018. a
Breuning, J. and Yanders, A.: FLL guidelines for the planning, construction and
maintenance of green roofing, Green Roof Service LLC Baltimore, MD, USA, 2008. a
Carson, T., Marasco, D., Culligan, P., and McGillis, W.: Hydrological
performance of extensive green roofs in New York City: observations and
multi-year modeling of three full-scale systems, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 024036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024036, 2013. a
Cipolla, S. S., Maglionico, M., and Stojkov, I.: A long-term hydrological
modelling of an extensive green roof by means of SWMM, Ecol. Eng., 95, 876–887, 2016. a
Daniel, T.: Neural networks – Applications in hydrology and
water resources engineering, Proc., Int. Hydrology and Water Resources Symp., Vol. 3, 797–802, National Conference Publication 91/22, Institute of Engineers, Perth, Australia, 1991. a
DHI: MIKE URBAN Collection System. Modelling of Storm Water Drainage Networks
and Sewer Collection Systems. User Guide, Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI),
Hørsholm, Denmark, 2017. a
Dunnett, N. and Kingsbury, N.: Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls, Timber Press, Cambridge, 2004. a
Fassman, E. and Simcock, R.: Moisture measurements as performance criteria for
extensive living roof substrates, J. Environ. Eng., 138,
841–851, 2012. a
Fassman-Beck, E., Voyde, E., Simcock, R., and Hong, Y. S.: 4 Living roofs in 3
locations: Does configuration affect runoff mitigation?, J. Hydrol., 490, 11–20, 2013. a
Gharaei-Manesh, S., Fathzadeh, A., and Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R.: Comparison of
artificial neural network and decision tree models in estimating spatial
distribution of snow depth in a semi-arid region of Iran, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 122, 26–35, 2016. a
Goyal, M. K., Ojha, C., Singh, R., Swamee, P., Nema, R.: Application of
ANN, fuzzy logic and decision tree algorithms for the development of
reservoir operating rules, Water Resour. Manag., 27, 911–925,
2013a. a
Goyal, M. K., Ojha, C., Singh, R., Swamee, P.: Application of
artificial neural network, fuzzy logic and decision tree algorithms for
modelling of streamflow at Kasol in India, Water Sci. Technol., 68,
2521–2526, 2013b. a
Hernes, R. R., Gragne, A. S., Abdalla, E. M., Braskerud, B. C., Alfredsen, K.,
and Muthanna, T. M.: Assessing the effects of four SUDS scenarios on combined
sewer overflows in Oslo, Norway: evaluating the low-impact development module
of the Mike Urban model, Hydrol. Res., 51, 1437–1454, 2020. a
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory, Neural Comput.,
9, 1735–1780, 1997. a
Hsu, K.-l., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Artificial neural network
modeling of the rainfall-runoff process, Water Resour. Res., 31,
2517–2530, 1995. a
Hu, C., Wu, Q., Li, H., Jian, S., Li, N., and Lou, Z.: Deep learning with a
long short-term memory networks approach for rainfall-runoff simulation,
Water, 10, 1543, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111543, 2018. a
Jahanfar, A., Drake, J., Sleep, B., and Gharabaghi, B.: A modified FAO
evapotranspiration model for refined water budget analysis for Green Roof
systems, Ecol. Eng., 119, 45–53, 2018. a
Javan, K., Lialestani, M. R. F. H., and Nejadhossein, M.: A comparison of ANN
and HSPF models for runoff simulation in Gharehsoo River watershed, Iran,
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1, 1–13, 2015. a
Johannessen, B. G., Hanslin, H. M., and Muthanna, T. M.: Green roof performance
potential in cold and wet regions, Ecol. Eng., 106, 436–447,
2017. a
Johannessen, B. G., Hamouz, V., Gragne, A. S., and Muthanna, T. M.: The
transferability of SWMM model parameters between green roofs with similar
build-up, J. Hydrol., 569, 816–828, 2019. a
Karlsson, M. and Yakowitz, S.: Nearest-neighbor methods for nonparametric
rainfall-runoff forecasting, Water Resour. Res., 23, 1300–1308, 1987. a
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F.: World map of the
Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorol. Z., 15, 259–263, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130, 2006. a
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., and Herrnegger, M.: Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6005–6022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Shalev, G., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5089–5110, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019, 2019. a
Krebs, G., Kuoppamäki, K., Kokkonen, T., and Koivusalo, H.: Simulation of
green roof test bed runoff, Hydrol. Process., 30, 250–262, 2016. a
Kuhn, M., Weston, S., Keefer, C., and Coulter, N.: Cubist models for
regression, R package Vignette R package version 0.0, 18, available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Cubist/index.html (last access: 10 November 2021), 2012. a
Li, Y. and Babcock Jr., R. W.: Modeling hydrologic performance of a green roof
system with HYDRUS-2D, J. Environ. Eng., 141, 04015036, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000976, 2015. a
Liu, X. and Chui, T. F. M.: Evaluation of green roof performance in mitigating
the impact of extreme storms, Water, 11, 815, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040815, 2019. a
Modaresi, F., Araghinejad, S., and Ebrahimi, K.: A comparative assessment of
artificial neural network, generalized regression neural network,
least-square support vector regression, and K-nearest neighbor regression for
monthly streamflow forecasting in linear and nonlinear conditions, Water
Resour. Manage., 32, 243–258, 2018. a
Multiphysics, C.: User Guide Version 4.4, COMSOL Multiphysics, Stockholm,
Sweden, 2013. a
Palla, A., Gnecco, I., and Lanza, L. G.: Unsaturated 2D modelling of subsurface
water flow in the coarse-grained porous matrix of a green roof, J.
Hydrol., 379, 193–204, 2009. a
Peng, Z. and Stovin, V.: Independent validation of the SWMM green roof module,
J. Hydrol. Eng., 22, 04017037, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001558, 2017. a
Quinlan, J. R.: Combining instance-based and model-based learning, in:
Proceedings of the tenth international conference on machine learning, 236–243, Amherst, Massachusetts, 27–29 June 1993. a
Quinlan, J. R.: Learning with continuous classes, in: 5th Australian
joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 92, 343–348, World
Scientific, 1992. a
Radfar, A. and Rockaway, T. D.: Captured runoff prediction model by permeable
pavements using artificial neural networks, J. Infrastruct.
Syst., 22, 04016007, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000284, 2016. a, b
Rezaei, F., Jarrett, A., Berghage, R., and Beattie, D.: Evapotranspiration
rates from extensive green roof plant species, in: 2005 ASAE Annual Meeting,
p. 1, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.18942, 2005. a
Rosa, D. J., Clausen, J. C., and Dietz, M. E.: Calibration and verification of
SWMM for low impact development, J. Am. Water. Resour. As., 51, 746–757, 2015. a
Rossman, L. A.: Storm water management model user's manual, version 5.0., Cincinnati: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. a
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J.: Learning representations
by back-propagating errors, Nature, 323, 533–536, 1986. a
She, N. and Pang, J.: Physically based green roof model, J. Hydrol. Eng., 15, 458–464, 2010. a
Shen, C.: A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its
relevance for water resources scientists, Water Resour. Res., 54,
8558–8593, 2018. a
Sherrard Jr., J. A. and Jacobs, J. M.: Vegetated roof water-balance model:
experimental and model results, J. Hydrol. Eng., 17,
858–868, 2012. a
Shortridge, J. E., Guikema, S. D., and Zaitchik, B. F.: Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2611–2628, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2611-2016, 2016. a
Sims, A. W., Robinson, C. E., Smart, C. C., and O'Carroll, D. M.: Mechanisms
controlling green roof peak flow rate attenuation, J. Hydrol., 577,
123972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123972, 2019. a, b, c
Simunek, J., Vogel, T., and van Genuchten, M. T.: The SWMS_2D code for simulating water flow and solute transport in two-dimensional variably saturated media, US Salinity Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1994. a
Simunek, J., Van Genuchten, M. T., and Sejna, M.: The HYDRUS-1D software
package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and
multiple solutes in variably-saturated media, University of
California-Riverside Research Reports, 3, 1–240, Riverside, California, 2005. a
Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., and Adams, R. P.: Practical bayesian optimization of
machine learning algorithms, Adv. Neur. In., 25, arXiv [preprint], arXiv:1206.2944, 2012. a, b, c
Soulis, K. X., Valiantzas, J. D., Ntoulas, N., Kargas, G., and Nektarios,
P. A.: Simulation of green roof runoff under different substrate depths and
vegetation covers by coupling a simple conceptual and a physically based
hydrological model, J. Environ. Manage., 200, 434–445, 2017. a
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov,
R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929–1958, 2014. a
Stovin, V.: The potential of green roofs to manage urban stormwater, Water Environ. J., 24, 192–199, 2010. a
Tokar, A. S. and Johnson, P. A.: Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial
neural networks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 4, 232–239, 1999. a
Vesuviano, G. and Stovin, V.: A generic hydrological model for a green roof
drainage layer, Water Sci. Technol., 68, 769–775, 2013. a
Vesuviano, G., Sonnenwald, F., and Stovin, V.: A two-stage storage routing
model for green roof runoff detention, Water Sci. Technol., 69,
1191–1197, 2014. a
Wilson, S.: ParBayesianOptimization: Parallel Bayesian Optimization of
Hyperparameters,
available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ParBayesianOptimization (last access: 10 November 2021), r
package version 1.2.4, 2021. a
Wu, C., Chau, K. W., and Li, Y. S.: Predicting monthly streamflow using
data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques, Water
Resour. Res., 45, 2009. a
Yilmaz, A. G. and Muttil, N.: Runoff estimation by machine learning methods and
application to the Euphrates Basin in Turkey, J. Hydrol.
Eng., 19, 1015–1025, 2014. a
Yio, M. H., Stovin, V., Werdin, J., and Vesuviano, G.: Experimental analysis of
green roof substrate detention characteristics, Water Sci. Technol.,
68, 1477–1486, 2013. a
Young, C.-C., Liu, W.-C., and Wu, M.-C.: A physically based and machine
learning hybrid approach for accurate rainfall-runoff modeling during extreme
typhoon events, Appl. Soft. Comput., 53, 205–216, 2017. a
Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, M., and Yang, J.: Developing a Long
Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based model for predicting water table depth in
agricultural areas, J. Hydrol., 561, 918–929, 2018. a
Short summary
This study investigated the potential of using machine learning algorithms as hydrological models of green roofs across different climatic condition. The study provides comparison between conceptual and machine learning algorithms. Machine learning models were found to be accurate in simulating runoff from extensive green roofs.
This study investigated the potential of using machine learning algorithms as hydrological...
