Articles | Volume 24, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5149-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5149-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 Nov 2020
Research article |
| 06 Nov 2020
| 06 Nov 2020
Importance of the informative content in the study area when regionalising rainfall-runoff model parameters: the role of nested catchments and gauging station density
DICAM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Juraj Parajka
Institute for Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Vienna
University of Technology, Austria
Elena Toth
DICAM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Related authors
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show that the differences between the forcing data included in three CAMELS datasets (US, BR, GB) and the forcing data included for the same catchments in the Caravan dataset affect model calibration considerably. The model performance dropped when the data from the Caravan dataset were used instead of the original data. Most of the model performance drop could be attributed to the differences in precipitation data. However, differences were largest for the potential evapotranspiration data.
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show that the differences between the forcing data included in three CAMELS datasets (US, BR, GB) and the forcing data included for the same catchments in the Caravan dataset affect model calibration considerably. The model performance dropped when the data from the Caravan dataset were used instead of the original data. Most of the model performance drop could be attributed to the differences in precipitation data. However, differences were largest for the potential evapotranspiration data.
Günter Blöschl, Andreas Buttinger-Kreuzhuber, Daniel Cornel, Julia Eisl, Michael Hofer, Markus Hollaus, Zsolt Horváth, Jürgen Komma, Artem Konev, Juraj Parajka, Norbert Pfeifer, Andreas Reithofer, José Salinas, Peter Valent, Roman Výleta, Jürgen Waser, Michael H. Wimmer, and Heinz Stiefelmeyer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2071–2091, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2071-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2071-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A methodology of regional flood hazard mapping is proposed, based on data in Austria, which combines automatic methods with manual interventions to maximise efficiency and to obtain estimation accuracy similar to that of local studies. Flood discharge records from 781 stations are used to estimate flood hazard patterns of a given return period at a resolution of 2 m over a total stream length of 38 000 km. The hazard maps are used for civil protection, risk awareness and insurance purposes.
Matteo Pesce, Alberto Viglione, Jost von Hardenberg, Larisa Tarasova, Stefano Basso, Ralf Merz, Juraj Parajka, and Rui Tong
Proc. IAHS, 385, 65–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-65-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-65-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The manuscript describes an application of PArameter Set Shuffling (PASS) approach in the Alpine region. A machine learning decision-tree algorithm is applied for the regional calibration of a conceptual semi-distributed hydrological model. Regional model efficiencies don't decrease significantly when moving in space from catchments used for the regional calibration (training) to catchments used for the procedure validation (test) and, in time, from the calibration to the verification period.
Veit Blauhut, Michael Stoelzle, Lauri Ahopelto, Manuela I. Brunner, Claudia Teutschbein, Doris E. Wendt, Vytautas Akstinas, Sigrid J. Bakke, Lucy J. Barker, Lenka Bartošová, Agrita Briede, Carmelo Cammalleri, Ksenija Cindrić Kalin, Lucia De Stefano, Miriam Fendeková, David C. Finger, Marijke Huysmans, Mirjana Ivanov, Jaak Jaagus, Jiří Jakubínský, Svitlana Krakovska, Gregor Laaha, Monika Lakatos, Kiril Manevski, Mathias Neumann Andersen, Nina Nikolova, Marzena Osuch, Pieter van Oel, Kalina Radeva, Renata J. Romanowicz, Elena Toth, Mirek Trnka, Marko Urošev, Julia Urquijo Reguera, Eric Sauquet, Aleksandra Stevkov, Lena M. Tallaksen, Iryna Trofimova, Anne F. Van Loon, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Niko Wanders, Micha Werner, Patrick Willems, and Nenad Živković
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2201–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recent drought events caused enormous damage in Europe. We therefore questioned the existence and effect of current drought management strategies on the actual impacts and how drought is perceived by relevant stakeholders. Over 700 participants from 28 European countries provided insights into drought hazard and impact perception and current management strategies. The study concludes with an urgent need to collectively combat drought risk via a European macro-level drought governance approach.
Rui Tong, Juraj Parajka, Borbála Széles, Isabella Greimeister-Pfeil, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Jürgen Komma, Peter Valent, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1779–1799, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The role and impact of using additional data (other than runoff) for the prediction of daily hydrographs in ungauged basins are not well understood. In this study, we assessed the model performance in terms of runoff, soil moisture, and snow cover predictions with the existing regionalization approaches. Results show that the best transfer methods are the similarity and the kriging approaches. The performance of the transfer methods differs between lowland and alpine catchments.
David Lun, Alberto Viglione, Miriam Bertola, Jürgen Komma, Juraj Parajka, Peter Valent, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5535–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5535-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5535-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate statistical properties of observed flood series on a European scale. There are pronounced regional patterns, for instance: regions with strong Atlantic influence show less year-to-year variability in the magnitude of observed floods when compared with more arid regions of Europe. The hydrological controls on the patterns are quantified and discussed. On the European scale, climate seems to be the dominant driver for the observed patterns.
Paul C. Astagneau, Guillaume Thirel, Olivier Delaigue, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Juraj Parajka, Claudia C. Brauer, Alberto Viglione, Wouter Buytaert, and Keith J. Beven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3937–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The R programming language has become an important tool for many applications in hydrology. In this study, we provide an analysis of some of the R tools providing hydrological models. In total, two aspects are uniformly investigated, namely the conceptualisation of the models and the practicality of their implementation for end-users. These comparisons aim at easing the choice of R tools for users and at improving their usability for hydrology modelling to support more transferable research.
Rui Tong, Juraj Parajka, Andreas Salentinig, Isabella Pfeil, Jürgen Komma, Borbála Széles, Martin Kubáň, Peter Valent, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Wolfgang Wagner, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1389–1410, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1389-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1389-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used a new and experimental version of the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) soil water index data set and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) C6 snow cover products for multiple objective calibrations of the TUWmodel in 213 catchments of Austria. Combined calibration to runoff, satellite soil moisture, and snow cover improves runoff (40 % catchments), soil moisture (80 % catchments), and snow (~ 100 % catchments) simulation compared to traditional calibration to runoff only.
Cited articles
Bao, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Fu, G., Wang, G., He, R., Yan, R., Jin, J., and
Liu, H.: Comparison of regionalization approaches based on regression and
similarity for predictions in ungauged catchments under multiple
hydro-climatic conditions, J. Hydrol., 466–467, 37–46,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.048, 2012.
Bergström, S.: Development and application of a conceptual runoff model
for Scandinavian catchments, Dept. of Water Resour. Engineering, Lund Inst
of Technol./Univ. of Lund, Bull. Ser. A, Lund, Sweden, No. 52, 1976.
Burn, D. H. and Boorman, D. B.: Catchment classification applied to the
estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, 143, 429–454, 1992.
Ceola, S., Arheimer, B., Baratti, E., Blöschl, G., Capell, R., Castellarin, A., Freer, J., Han, D., Hrachowitz, M., Hundecha, Y., Hutton, C., Lindström, G., Montanari, A., Nijzink, R., Parajka, J., Toth, E., Viglione, A., and Wagener, T.: Virtual laboratories: new opportunities for collaborative water science, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2101–2117, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2101-2015, 2015.
Cislaghi, A., Masseroni, D., Massari, C., Camici, S., and Brocca, L.: Combining a rainfall–runoff model and a
regionalization approach for flood and water resource assessment in the western Po Valley, Italy, Hydrolog.
Sci. J., 65, 348–370, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1690656, 2020.
Coron, L., Thirel, G., Delaigue, O., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.:
The Suite of Lumped GR Hydrological Models in an R package, Environ. Modell. Softw., 94, 166–171,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.05.002, 2017.
Coron, L., Delaigue, O., Thirel, G., Perrin, C., and Michel, C.: airGR: Suite of GR Hydrological Models for
Precipitation-Runoff Modelling. R package version 1.4.3.65, https://doi.org/10.15454/EX11NA, 2020.
Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Regions and Tourism, Republic of Austria:
Online database of daily discharge and precipitation: https://ehyd.gv.at/, last access: 26 October 2020.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J.,
Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret,
U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H. V., Hughes, D. A., Hut,
R. W., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P. A., Uhlenbrook, S.,
Wagener, T., Winsemius, H. C., Woods, R. A., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C.: A
decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a review, Hydrol. Sci. J.,
58, 1198–1255, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183, 2013.
He, Y., Bárdossy, A., and Zehe, E.: A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3539–3553, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3539-2011, 2011.
Kokkonen, T. S., Jakeman, A. J., Young, P. C., and Koivusalo, H. J.:
Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: Model regionalization from
catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina,
Hydrol. Process., 17, 2219–2238, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1329,
2003.
Lebecherel, L., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C.: On evaluating the
robustness of spatial-proximity-based regionalisation methods, J. Hydrol.,
539, 196–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.031, 2016
Li, H. and Zhang, Y.: Regionalising rainfall-runoff modelling for
predicting daily runoff: Comparing gridded spatial proximity and gridded
integrated similarity approaches against their lumped counterparts, J.
Hydrol., 550, 279–293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.015, 2017.
Lindström, G., Johansson, B., Persson, M., Gardelin, M., and
Bergström, S.: Development and test of the distributed HBV-96
hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 201, 272–288,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00041-3, 1997.
McIntyre, N. R., Lee, H., Wheater, H., Young, A., and Wagener, T.: Ensemble
predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments, Water Resour. Res., 41,
1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004289, 2005.
Merz, R. and Blöschl, G.: Regionalisation of catchment model
parameters, J. Hydrol., 287, 95–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028, 2004.
Merz, R., Blöschl, G., and Parajka, J.: Regionalization methods in rainfall-runoff modelling using large catchment samples, in: Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment—MOPEX, edited by: Andréassian, V., Hall, A., Chahinian, N., and Schaake, J., IAHS Publ., 307, 117–125, 2006.
Mészároš, I., Miklànek, P., and Parajka, J.: Solar energy
income modelling in mountainous areas, in: RB and NEFRIEND Proj.5 Conf.
Interdisciplinary Approaches in Small Catchment Hydrology: monitoring and
Research, edited by: Holko, L., Mikl'anek, P., Parajka, J.,
and Kostka, Z., Slovak NC IHP UNESCO/UH SAV, Bratislava, Slovakia, 127–135,
2002.
Moore, R. J.: The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at
point and basin scales, Hydrol. Sci. J., 30, 273–297,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509490989, 1985.
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Le Moine, N.:
Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A
comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments,
Water Resour. Res., 44, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006240,
2008.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Estimation of daily potential
evapotranspiration for regional water balance modeling in Austria, in: 11th
International Poster Day and Institute of Hydrology Open Day “Transport of
Water, Chemicals and Energy in the Soil – Crop Canopy – Atmosphere
System”, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, 299–306, 2003.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 157–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-157-2005, 2005.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Uncertainty and multiple objective
calibration in regional water balance modelling: case study in 320 Austrian
catchments, Hydrol. Process., 21, 435–446, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6253,
2007.
Parajka, J., Viglione, A., Rogger, M., Salinas, J. L., Sivapalan, M., and Blöschl, G.: Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1783–1795, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1783-2013, 2013.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., Skøien, J. O., and Viglione, A.: The role of
station density for predicting daily runoff by top-kriging interpolation in
Austria, J. Hydrol. Hydromechanics, 63, 228–234,
https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2015-0024, 2015.
Patil, S. and Stieglitz, M.: Controls on hydrologic similarity: role of nearby gauged catchments for prediction at an ungauged catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 551–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-551-2012, 2012.
Patil, S. and Stieglitz, M.: Comparing spatial and temporal transferability
of hydrological model parameters, J. Hydrol., 525, 409–417,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.003, 2015.
Peel, M. C. and Blöschl, G.: Hydrological modelling in a changing world,
Prog. Phys. Geogr., 35, 249–261,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402550, 2011.
Pushpalatha, R., Perrin, C., Le Moine, N., Mathevet, T., and
Andréassian, V.: A downward structural sensitivity analysis of
hydrological models to improve low-flow simulation, J. Hydrol., 411, 66–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.034, 2011.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 26 October 2020), 2018.
Razavi T. and Coulibaly, P.: Streamflow Prediction in Ungauged Basins:
Review of Regionalization Methods, J. Hydrol. Eng., 18, 958–975,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000690, 2013.
Reichl, J. P. C., Western, A. W., McIntyre, N. R., and Chiew, F. H. S.:
Optimization of a similarity measure for estimating ungauged streamflow,
Water Resour. Res., 45, W10423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007248, 2009.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., and Metcalfe, A.: Estimation of continuous
stremflows in Ontario ungauged basins: comparison of regionalization
methods, J. Hydrol. Eng., 16, 447–459,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000338, 2011.
Seibert, J.: Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff
model, Agr. For. Met., 98–99, 279–293, 1999.
Skøien, J. O., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Top-kriging – geostatistics on stream networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 277–287, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-277-2006, 2006.
Steinschneider, C., Yang, Y. E., and Brown, C.: Combining regression and
spatial proximity for catchment model regionalization: a comparative study,
Hydrol. Sci. J., 60, 1026–1043,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.899701, 2015.
Tolson B. A. and Shoemaker, C. A.: Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm
for computationally efficient watershed model calibration, Water Resour.
Res., 43, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004723, 2007.
Valéry, A., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C.: Regionalization of
precipitation and air temperature over high-altitude catchments – learning
from outliers, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 928–940,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.504676, 2010.
Valéry, A., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C.: “As simple as possible
but not simpler”: What is useful in a temperature-based snow-accounting
routine? Part 2 – Sensitivity analysis of the Cemaneige snow accounting
routine on 380 catchments, J. Hydrol., 517, 1176–1187,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.058, 2014.
Viglione, A. and Parajka, J.: TUWmodel: Lumped/Semi-Distributed Hydrological
Model for Education Purposes. R package version 1.1-0,
available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TUWmodel (last access: 26 October 2020), 2019.
Viglione, A., Parajka, J., Rogger, M., Salinas, J. L., Laaha, G., Sivapalan, M., and Blöschl, G.: Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2263–2279, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2263-2013, 2013.
Viviroli, D., Mittelbach, H., Gurtz, J., and Weingartner, R.: Continuous
simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of
Switzerland – Part II: parameter regionalisation and flood estimation
results, J. Hydrol., 377, 208–225,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.022, 2009.
Yang, X., Magnusson, J., Rizzi, J., and Xu, C.: Runoff prediction in
ungauged catchments in Norway: comparison of regionalization approaches,
Hydrol. Res., 49, 487–505, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.071, 2018.
Zelelew, M. B. and Alfredsen, K.: Transferability of hydrological model
parameter spaces in the estimation of runoff in ungauged catchments, Hydrol.
Sci. J., 59, 1470–1490, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.838003,
2014.
Short summary
One of the most informative ways to gain information on ungauged river sections is through the implementation of a rainfall-runoff model, exploiting the information collected in gauged catchments in the study area. This study analyses how the performances of different model regionalisation approaches are influenced by the informative content of the available regional data set, in order to identify the methods that are more suitable for the data availability in the region.
One of the most informative ways to gain information on ungauged river sections is through the...
