Articles | Volume 24, issue 6
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3251–3269, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3251–3269, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020

Research article 23 Jun 2020

Research article | 23 Jun 2020

Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability

Chao Gao et al.

Related authors

AI-based techniques for multi-step streamflow forecasts: application for multi-objective reservoir operation optimization and performance assessment
Yuxue Guo, Xinting Yu, Yue-Ping Xu, Hao Chen, Haiting Gu, and Jingkai Xie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5951–5979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021, 2021
Short summary
Historical simulation of maize water footprints with a new global gridded crop model ACEA
Oleksandr Mialyk, Joep F. Schyns, Martijn J. Booij, and Rick J. Hogeboom
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-329,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-329, 2021
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
A new fractal-theory-based criterion for hydrological model calibration
Zhixu Bai, Yao Wu, Di Ma, and Yue-Ping Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3675–3690, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3675-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3675-2021, 2021
Short summary
Potential application of hydrological ensemble prediction in forecasting floods and its components over the Yarlung Zangbo River basin, China
Li Liu, Yue Ping Xu, Su Li Pan, and Zhi Xu Bai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3335–3352, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3335-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3335-2019, 2019
Short summary
Performance of ensemble streamflow forecasts under varied hydrometeorological conditions
Harm-Jan F. Benninga, Martijn J. Booij, Renata J. Romanowicz, and Tom H. M. Rientjes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5273–5291, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5273-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5273-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
Hadush Meresa, Conor Murphy, Rowan Fealy, and Saeed Golian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5237–5257, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5237-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5237-2021, 2021
Short summary
Bias-correcting input variables enhances forecasting of reference crop evapotranspiration
Qichun Yang, Quan J. Wang, Kirsti Hakala, and Yating Tang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4773–4788, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4773-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4773-2021, 2021
Short summary
Choosing between post-processing precipitation forecasts or chaining several uncertainty quantification tools in hydrological forecasting systems
Emixi Sthefany Valdez, François Anctil, and Maria-Helena Ramos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-391,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-391, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Uncertainty of gridded precipitation and temperature reference datasets in climate change impact studies
Mostafa Tarek, François Brissette, and Richard Arsenault
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3331–3350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3331-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3331-2021, 2021
Short summary
At which timescale does the complementary principle perform best in evaporation estimation?
Liming Wang, Songjun Han, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 375–386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-375-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-375-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Addor, N., Rössler, O., Köplin, N., Huss, M., Weingartner, R., and Seibert, J.: Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7541–7562, 2014. 
Akhtar, M., Ahmad, N., and Booij, M. J.: Use of regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological models for the Hindukush-Karakorum-Himalaya region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1075–1089, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1075-2009, 2009. 
Bosshard, T., Carambia, M., Goergen, K., Kotlarski, S., Krahe, P., Zappa, M., and Schär, C.: Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1523–1536, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr011533, 2013. 
Bracegirdle, T. J., Turner, J., Hosking, J. S., and Phillips, T.: Sources of uncertainty in projections of twenty-first century westerly wind changes over the Amundsen Sea, West Antarctica, in CMIP5 climate models, Clim. Dynam., 43, 2093–2104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2032-1, 2014. 
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., Poulin, A., and Leconte, R.: Overall uncertainty study of the hydrological impacts of climate change for a Canadian watershed, Water Resour. Res., 47, W12509, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr010602, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
This paper studies the impact of climate change on high and low flows and quantifies the contribution of uncertainty sources from representative concentration pathways (RCPs), global climate models (GCMs) and internal climate variability in extreme flows. Internal climate variability was reflected in a stochastic rainfall model. The results show the importance of internal climate variability and GCM uncertainty in high flows and GCM and RCP uncertainty in low flows especially for the far future.