Articles | Volume 20, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016
Research article
 | 
10 Oct 2016
Research article |  | 10 Oct 2016

Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research

Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana and Maurits Willem Ertsen

Related authors

Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research
K. E. R. Pramana, M. W. Ertsen, and N. C. van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-9489-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-9489-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research
Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2301–2317, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022, 2022
Short summary
Power and empowerment in transdisciplinary research: a negotiated approach for peri-urban groundwater problems in the Ganges Delta
Leon M. Hermans, Vishal Narain, Remi Kempers, Sharlene L. Gomes, Poulomi Banerjee, Rezaul Hasan, Mashfiqus Salehin, Shah Alam Khan, A. T. M. Zakir Hossain, Kazi Faisal Islam, Sheikh Nazmul Huda, Partha Sarathi Banerjee, Binoy Majumder, Soma Majumder, and Wil A. H. Thissen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2201–2219, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2201-2022, 2022
Short summary
A socio-hydrological framework for understanding conflict and cooperation with respect to transboundary rivers
Yongping Wei, Jing Wei, Gen Li, Shuanglei Wu, David Yu, Mohammad Ghoreishi, You Lu, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Murugesu Sivapalan, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2131–2146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2131-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2131-2022, 2022
Short summary
A review of the applicability of the motivations and abilities (MOTA) framework for assessing the implementation success of water resources management plans and policies
John Conallin, Nathan Ning, Jennifer Bond, Nicholas Pawsey, Lee J. Baumgartner, Dwi Atminarso, Hannah McPherson, Wayne Robinson, and Garry Thorncraft
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1357–1370, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1357-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1357-2022, 2022
Short summary
Social dilemmas and poor water quality in household water systems
Gopal Penny, Diogo Bolster, and Marc F. Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1187–1202, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1187-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1187-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnstein, S. R.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation, J. Am. Inst. Plann., 35, 216–224, 1969.
Baiocchi, D. and Fox, D. S.: Surprise! From CEOs to Navy SEALs: How a Select Group of Professionals Prepare for and Respond to the Unexpected, Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR341.html, 2013.
Beratan, K. K.: Summary: addressing the interactional challenges of moving collaborative adaptive management from theory to practice, Ecol. Soc., 19, 46, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06399-190146, 2014.
Blume, T., Zehe, E., Reusser, D. E., Iroume, A., and Bronstert, A.: Investigation of runoff generation in a pristine, poorly gauged catchment in the Chilean Andes I: A multimethod experimental study, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3661–3675, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6971, 2008.
Choguill, M. B. G.: A Ladder of Community Participation for Underdeveloped Countries, Habitat Int., 20, 431–444, 1996.
Download
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.