Articles | Volume 20, issue 10
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article 10 Oct 2016
Research article | 10 Oct 2016
Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana and Maurits Willem Ertsen
Related authors
K. E. R. Pramana, M. W. Ertsen, and N. C. van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-9489-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-9489-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted
Dimitrios Bouziotas and Maurits Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-107, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-107, 2017
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Based on a review of key concepts in agent-based modeling, this study presents a proof of concept of an agent-based model based on the existing real setting of the Irrigation Management Game. The proposed template offers a bottom-up approach to socio-hydrological modeling design, as individual agent behavior explicitly co-shapes the response of the whole system, thus allowing the discovery of emergent dynamics and the exploration of suitable cooperation strategies in irrigation networks.
K. E. R. Pramana, M. W. Ertsen, and N. C. van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-9489-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-9489-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted
S. Pande, M. Ertsen, and M. Sivapalan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3239–3258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3239-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3239-2014, 2014
S. Pande and M. Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1745–1760, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, 2014
M. W. Ertsen, J. T. Murphy, L. E. Purdue, and T. Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1369–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Quantifying the impacts of compound extremes on agriculture
Comparison of published palaeoclimate records suitable for reconstructing annual to sub-decadal hydroclimatic variability in eastern Australia: implications for water resource management and planning
Unraveling intractable water conflicts: the entanglement of science and politics in decision-making on large hydraulic infrastructure
A Water-Energy-Food Nexus approach for conducting trade-off analysis: Morocco's phosphate industry in the Khouribga region
A watershed classification approach that looks beyond hydrology: application to a semi-arid, agricultural region in Canada
Role-play simulations as an aid to achieve complex learning outcomes in hydrological science
Using a coupled agent-based modeling approach to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions
Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging
Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience
Challenges to implementing bottom-up flood risk decision analysis frameworks: how strong are social networks of flooding professionals?
Socio-hydrological spaces in the Jamuna River floodplain in Bangladesh
An improved method for calculating the regional crop water footprint based on a hydrological process analysis
How downstream sub-basins depend on upstream inflows to avoid scarcity: typology and global analysis of transboundary rivers
An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: case study research
HESS Opinions: A conceptual framework for assessing socio-hydrological resilience under change
Socio-hydrological perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and groundwater in Cangzhou, North China Plain
Geoscience on television: a review of science communication literature in the context of geosciences
A "mental models" approach to the communication of subsurface hydrology and hazards
Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity
Socio-hydrological water balance for water allocation between human and environmental purposes in catchments
Long-term monitoring of nitrate transport to drainage from three agricultural clayey till fields
Complex network theory, streamflow, and hydrometric monitoring system design
Hydrological drought types in cold climates: quantitative analysis of causing factors and qualitative survey of impacts
Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities
Assessing blue and green water utilisation in wheat production of China from the perspectives of water footprint and total water use
A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods
Quantifying the human impact on water resources: a critical review of the water footprint concept
Endogenous change: on cooperation and water availability in two ancient societies
Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin
Relationships between environmental governance and water quality in a growing metropolitan area of the Pacific Northwest, USA
A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step – human agency, hydrological processes and time in socio-hydrology
Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji–Tire model
Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world
Evolving water science in the Anthropocene
Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
Reconstructing the duty of water: a study of emergent norms in socio-hydrology
Water consumption from hydropower plants – review of published estimates and an assessment of the concept
Water Accounting Plus (WA+) – a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements
Cyanobacterial and microcystins dynamics following the application of hydrogen peroxide to waste stabilisation ponds
A regional and multi-faceted approach to postgraduate water education – the WaterNet experience in Southern Africa
Reframing hydrology education to solve coupled human and environmental problems
Experiences from online and classroom education in hydroinformatics
Enhancing capacities of riparian professionals to address and resolve transboundary issues in international river basins: experiences from the Lower Mekong River Basin
Assessing ecological land use and water demand of river systems: a case study in Luanhe River, North China
Irrigania – a web-based game about sharing water resources
Competence formation and post-graduate education in the public water sector in Indonesia
A climate-flood link for the lower Mekong River
Experiences of using mobile technologies and virtual field tours in Physical Geography: implications for hydrology education
The Indus basin in the framework of current and future water resources management
Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest Region of North America
Iman Haqiqi, Danielle S. Grogan, Thomas W. Hertel, and Wolfram Schlenker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 551–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-551-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-551-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study combines a fine-scale weather product with outputs of a hydrological model to construct functional metrics of individual and compound hydroclimatic extremes for agriculture. Then, a yield response function is estimated with individual and compound metrics focusing on corn in the United States during the 1981–2015 period. The findings suggest that metrics of compound hydroclimatic extremes are better predictors of corn yield variations than metrics of individual extremes.
Anna L. Flack, Anthony S. Kiem, Tessa R. Vance, Carly R. Tozer, and Jason L. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5699–5712, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Palaeoclimate information was analysed for eastern Australia to determine when (and where) there was agreement about the timing of wet and dry epochs in the pre-instrumental period (1000–1899). The results show that instrumental records (~1900–present) underestimate the full range of rainfall variability that has occurred. When coupled with projected impacts of climate change and growing demands, these results highlight major challenges for water resource management and infrastructure.
Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Nora Van Cauwenbergh, and Pieter van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4903–4921, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4903-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Our research studies whether science depoliticizes water conflicts or instead conflicts politicize science–policy processes. We analyze a water conflict due to the development of large infrastructure. We interviewed key actors in the conflict and replicated the results of water resources models developed to solve the conflict. We found that knowledge produced in isolation has no positive effect in transforming the conflict; instead, its potential could be enhanced if produced collaboratively.
Sang-Hyun Lee, Amjad T. Assi, Bassel Daher, Fatima E. Mengoub, and Rabi H. Mohtar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4727–4741, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4727-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Proper water availability for the right place and time in a changing climate requires analysis of complex scientific, technical, socioeconomic, regulatory, and political issues. A Water-Energy-Food Nexus Phosphate (WEF-P) Tool, based on integrating supply chain processes, transportation, and water–energy footprints could assess the various scenarios to offer an effective means of ensuring sustainable management of limited resources to both agricultural areas and the phosphate industry.
Jared D. Wolfe, Kevin R. Shook, Chris Spence, and Colin J. Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3945–3967, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3945-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Watershed classification can identify regions expected to respond similarly to disturbance. Methods should extend beyond hydrology to include other environmental questions, such as ecology and water quality. We developed a classification for the Canadian Prairie and identified seven classes defined by watershed characteristics, including elevation, climate, wetland density, and surficial geology. Results provide a basis for evaluating watershed response to land management and climate condition.
Arvid Bring and Steve W. Lyon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2369–2378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2369-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrology education strives to teach students both quantitative ability and complex professional skills. Our research shows that role-play simulations are useful to make students able to integrate various analytical skills in complicated settings while not interfering with traditional teaching that fosters their ability to solve mathematical problems. Despite this there are several potential challenging areas in using role-plays, and we therefore suggest ways around these potential roadblocks.
Jin-Young Hyun, Shih-Yu Huang, Yi-Chen Ethan Yang, Vincent Tidwell, and Jordan Macknick
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2261–2278, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2261-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study applies a two-way coupled agent-based model (ABM) with a river-reservoir management model (RiverWare) to analyze the role of risk perception in water management decisions using the Bayesian inference mapping joined with the cost–loss model. The calibration results capture the dynamics of historical irrigated area and streamflow changes and suggest that the proposed framework improves the representation of human decision-making processes compared to conventional rule-based ABMs.
Henning Lebrenz and András Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1633–1648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Many variables, e.g., in hydrology, geology, and social sciences, are only observed at a few distinct measurement locations, and their actual distribution in the entire space remains unknown. We introduce the new geostatistical interpolation method of
quantile kriging, providing an improved estimator and associated uncertainty. It can also host variables, which would not fulfill the implicit presumptions of the traditional geostatistical interpolation methods.
Gemma J. Venhuizen, Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Cathelijne R. Stoof, and Ionica Smeets
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Do experts attach the same meaning as laypeople to terms often used in hydrology such as "river", "flooding" and "downstream"? In this study a survey was completed by 34 experts and 119 laypeople to answer this question. We found that there are some profound differences between experts and laypeople: words like "river" and "river basin" turn out to have a different interpretation between the two groups. However, when using pictures there is much more agreement between the groups.
James O. Knighton, Osamu Tsuda, Rebecca Elliott, and M. Todd Walter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5657–5673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Decision-making for flood risk management is often the collective effort of professionals within government, NGOs, private practice, and advocacy groups. Our research investigates differences among flood experts within Tompkins County, New York (USA). We explore how they differ in their perceptions of flooding risk, desired project outcomes, and knowledge. We observe substantial differences among experts, and recommend formally acknowledging these perceptions when engaging in flood management.
Md Ruknul Ferdous, Anna Wesselink, Luigia Brandimarte, Kymo Slager, Margreet Zwarteveen, and Giuliano Di Baldassarre
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5159–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5159-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Socio-hydrological space (SHS) is a concept that enriches the study of socio-hydrology because it helps understand the detailed human–water interactions in a specific location. The concept suggests that the interactions between society and water are place-bound because of differences in social processes and river dynamics. This would be useful for developing interventions under disaster management, but also other development goals. SHS provides a new way of looking at socio-hydrological systems.
Xiao-Bo Luan, Ya-Li Yin, Pu-Te Wu, Shi-Kun Sun, Yu-Bao Wang, Xue-Rui Gao, and Jing Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5111–5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5111-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
At present, the water footprint calculated by the quantitative method of crop production water footprint is only a field-scale water footprint, which does not contain all the water consumption of the crop growth process, so its calculated crop production water footprint is incomplete. In this study, the hydrological model SWAT was used to analyze the real water consumption in the course of crop growth, so that the actual water consumption of the crops could be more accurately reflected.
Hafsa Ahmed Munia, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Naho Mirumachi, Yoshihide Wada, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2795–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2795-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
An analytical framework is developed drawing on ideas of regime shifts from resilience literature to understand the transition between cases where water scarcity is or is not experienced depending on whether water from upstream is or is not available. The analysis shows 386 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible stress and 306 million people dependent on upstream water to avoid possible shortage. This provides insights into implications for negotiations between sub-basins.
Erik Mostert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 317–329, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-317-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper argues for an alternative approach for socio‒hydrology: detailed case study research. Detailed case study research can increase understanding of how society interacts with hydrology, offers more levers for management than coupled modelling, and facilitates interdisciplinary cooperation. The paper presents a case study of the Dommel Basin in the Netherlands and Belgium and compares this with a published model of the Kissimmee Basin in Florida.
Feng Mao, Julian Clark, Timothy Karpouzoglou, Art Dewulf, Wouter Buytaert, and David Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3655–3670, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper aims to propose a conceptual framework that supports nuanced understanding and analytical assessment of resilience in socio-hydrological contexts. We identify three framings of resilience for different human–water couplings, which have distinct application fields and are used for different water management challenges. To assess and improve socio-hydrological resilience in each type, we introduce a
resilience canvasas a heuristic tool to design bespoke management strategies.
Songjun Han, Fuqiang Tian, Ye Liu, and Xianhui Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3619–3633, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3619-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The history of the co-evolution of the coupled human–groundwater system in Cangzhou (a region with the most serious depression cone in the North China Plain) is analyzed with a particular focus on how the groundwater crisis unfolded and how people attempted to settle the crisis. The evolution of the system was substantially impacted by two droughts. Further restoration of groundwater environment could be anticipated, but the occurrence of drought still remains an undetermined external forcing.
Rolf Hut, Anne M. Land-Zandstra, Ionica Smeets, and Cathelijne R. Stoof
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2507–2518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2507-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
To help geo-scientists prepare for TV appearances, we review the scientific literature on effective science communication related to TV. We identify six main themes: scientist motivation, target audience, narratives and storytelling, jargon and information transfer, relationship between scientists and journalists, and stereotypes of scientists on TV. We provide a detailed case study as illustration for each theme.
Hazel Gibson, Iain S. Stewart, Sabine Pahl, and Alison Stokes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1737–1749, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1737-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides empirical evidence for the value of using a psychology-based approach to communication of hydrology and hazards. It demonstrates the use of the "mental models" approach to risk assessment used in a regional geoscience context to explore the conceptions of the geological subsurface between experts and non-experts, and how that impacts on communication.
J. F. Schyns, A. Y. Hoekstra, and M. J. Booij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4581–4608, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4581-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The paper draws attention to the fact that green water (soil moisture returning to the atmosphere through evaporation) is a scarce resource, because its availability is limited and there are competing demands for green water. Around 80 indicators of green water availability and scarcity are reviewed and classified based on their scope and purpose of measurement. This is useful in order to properly include limitations in green water availability in water scarcity assessments.
S. Zhou, Y. Huang, Y. Wei, and G. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3715–3726, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3715-2015, 2015
V. Ernstsen, P. Olsen, and A. E. Rosenbom
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3475–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3475-2015, 2015
M. J. Halverson and S. W. Fleming
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3301–3318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015, 2015
A. F. Van Loon, S. W. Ploum, J. Parajka, A. K. Fleig, E. Garnier, G. Laaha, and H. A. J. Van Lanen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1993–2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1993-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological drought types in cold climates have complex causing factors and impacts. In Austria and Norway, a lack of snowmelt is mainly related to below-normal winter precipitation, and a lack of glaciermelt is mainly related to below-normal summer temperature. These and other hydrological drought types impacted hydropower production, water supply, and agriculture in Europe and the US in the recent and far past. For selected drought events in Norway impacts could be coupled to causing factors.
A. Fernald, S. Guldan, K. Boykin, A. Cibils, M. Gonzales, B. Hurd, S. Lopez, C. Ochoa, M. Ortiz, J. Rivera, S. Rodriguez, and C. Steele
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 293–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, 2015
X. C. Cao, P. T. Wu, Y. B. Wang, and X. N. Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3165–3178, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014, 2014
K. Madani, M. Zarezadeh, and S. Morid
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3055–3068, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014, 2014
J. Chenoweth, M. Hadjikakou, and C. Zoumides
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2325–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2325-2014, 2014
S. Pande and M. Ertsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1745–1760, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1745-2014, 2014
P. Gober and H. S. Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1413–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, 2014
H. Chang, P. Thiers, N. R. Netusil, J. A. Yeakley, G. Rollwagen-Bollens, S. M. Bollens, and S. Singh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1383–1395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1383-2014, 2014
M. W. Ertsen, J. T. Murphy, L. E. Purdue, and T. Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1369–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, 2014
Y. Liu, F. Tian, H. Hu, and M. Sivapalan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289–1303, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, 2014
S. N. Lane
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014
H. H. G. Savenije, A. Y. Hoekstra, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 319–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, 2014
A. Wutich, A. C. White, D. D. White, K. L. Larson, A. Brewis, and C. Roberts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 109–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-109-2014, 2014
J. L. Jr. Wescoat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4759–4768, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4759-2013, 2013
T. H. Bakken, Å. Killingtveit, K. Engeland, K. Alfredsen, and A. Harby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3983–4000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013, 2013
P. Karimi, W. G. M. Bastiaanssen, and D. Molden
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2459–2472, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2459-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2459-2013, 2013
D. J. Barrington, A. Ghadouani, and G. N. Ivey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2097–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2097-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2097-2013, 2013
L. Jonker, P. van der Zaag, B. Gumbo, J. Rockström, D. Love, and H. H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4225–4232, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4225-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4225-2012, 2012
E. G. King, F. C. O'Donnell, and K. K. Caylor
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4023–4031, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012, 2012
I. Popescu, A. Jonoski, and B. Bhattacharya
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3935–3944, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3935-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3935-2012, 2012
W. Douven, M. L. Mul, B. Fernández-Álvarez, S. Lam Hung, N. Bakker, G. Radosevich, and P. van der Zaag
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3183–3197, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3183-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3183-2012, 2012
D. H. Yan, G. Wang, H. Wang, and T. L. Qin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2469–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012, 2012
J. Seibert and M. J. P. Vis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2523–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2523-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2523-2012, 2012
J. M. Kaspersma, G. J. Alaerts, and J. H. Slinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2379–2392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2379-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2379-2012, 2012
J. M. Delgado, B. Merz, and H. Apel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1533–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1533-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1533-2012, 2012
D. G. Kingston, W. J. Eastwood, P. I. Jones, R. Johnson, S. Marshall, and D. M. Hannah
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1281–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012, 2012
A. N. Laghari, D. Vanham, and W. Rauch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1063–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1063-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1063-2012, 2012
A. F. Hamlet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1427–1443, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011, 2011
Cited articles
Arnstein, S. R.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation, J. Am. Inst. Plann., 35, 216–224, 1969.
Baiocchi, D. and Fox, D. S.: Surprise! From CEOs to Navy SEALs: How a Select Group of Professionals Prepare for and Respond to the Unexpected, Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR341.html, 2013.
Beratan, K. K.: Summary: addressing the interactional challenges of moving collaborative adaptive management from theory to practice, Ecol. Soc., 19, 46, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06399-190146, 2014.
Blume, T., Zehe, E., Reusser, D. E., Iroume, A., and Bronstert, A.: Investigation of runoff generation in a pristine, poorly gauged catchment in the Chilean Andes I: A multimethod experimental study, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3661–3675, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6971, 2008.
Choguill, M. B. G.: A Ladder of Community Participation for Underdeveloped Countries, Habitat Int., 20, 431–444, 1996.
Cleaver, F.: Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development, J. Int. Develop., 11, p. 597, 1999.
Daniell, K. A., White, I., Ferrand, N., Ribarova, I. S., Coad, P., Rougier, J.-E., Hare, M., Jones, N. A., Popova, A., Rollin, D., Perez, P., and Burn, S.: Co-engineering participatory water management processes: theory and insights from Australian and Bulgarian interventions, Ecol. Soc., 15, 11, available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art11/ (last access: 20 May 2014), 2010.
Dewar. J. A: Assumption-based Planning, A Tool for Reducing Avoidable Surprises, RAND, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 248 pp., 2002.
Dewar, J. A., Builder, C. H., Hix, W. M., and Levin, M. H.: Assumption-based planning; A Planning Tool for Very Uncertain Times, RAND CORP Santa Monica, CA, 78 pp., 1993.
Doty, R. D.: Soil water distribution on a contour-trenched area, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Research Note INT-163, 6 pp., 1972.
ECSP: Water Stories: Expanding Opportunities in Small-scale water and sanitation projects, Report from the Navigating Peace Initiative of the Environmental Change and Security Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, 89 pp., 2006.
Ertsen, M. W.: The technical and the social in engineering education, in: Design and the social sciences, Making connections, edited by: Frascara J., Taylor and Francis, London, 146–157, 2002.
Ertsen, M. W. and Hut, R.: Two waterfalls do not hear each other. Sand-storage dams, science and sustainable development in Kenya, Phys. Chem.-Earth, 34, 14–22, 2009.
Ertsen, M. W., Biesbrouck, B., Postma, L., and van Westerop, M.: Participatory design of sand storage dams, edited by: Goessling, T., Jansen, R. J. G., and Oerlemans, L. A. G., 2005 Coalitions and Collisions, Wolf Publishers, Nijmegen, 175–185, 2005.
Fabricius, C. and Cundill, G.:. Learning in adaptive management: insights from published practice. Ecol. Soc., 19, 29, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06263-190129, 2014.
Falkenmark, M., Fox, P., Persson, G., and Rockström, J.: Water harvesting for upgrading of rainfed agriculture, Problem analysis and research needs, Stockholm International Water Institute, 87 pp., 2001.
Farrington, J, Turton, C., and James, A. J.: Participatory watershed development, Challenges for the twenty-first century, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 382 pp., 1999.
Garnett, S. T., Sayer, J., and Du Toit, J.: Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework. Ecol. Soc., 12, 2, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art2/ (last access: 20 May 2014), 2007.
Gomani. M. C., Mahay, F., Mbilinyi, B., Dietrich, O., and Lischeid, G.: Establishment of a hydrological monitoring system through a participatory approach in a small tropical catchment in Tanzania: Learning hydrology from the local people. Proceedings of the Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, 6–8 October 2009, University of Hamburg, 4 pp., 2009.
Govardhan Das, S. V. and Rao, P. S.: Participatory Hydrological Monitoring (PHM) – An effective tool for community managed groundwater systems, in: Proceedings of the National conference on land resource management for food, employment and environmental security, Soil Conservation Society of India, 557–565, 2000.
Govardhan Das, S. V.: Judicious Management of Groundwater through Participatory Hydrological Monitoring: A Manual, Arcadis EuroConsult, Arnhem, the Netherlands, available at: http://www.groundwatermanagement.org/documents/manualpcphydrologicalmonitoring.pdf (last access: 30 June 2014), 2003.
Hagen, D. and Evju, M.: Using short-term monitoring data to achieve goals in a large-scale restoration. Ecol. Soc., 18, 29, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05769-180329, 2013.
Hamilton S.: Completing the loop: from data to decisions and back to data,. Hydrol. Process., 21, 3105–3106, 2007.
Hrachowitz, M., Bohte, R., Mul, M. L., Bogaard, T. A., Savenije, H. H. G., and Uhlenbrook, S.: On the value of combined event runoff and tracer analysis to improve understanding of catchment functioning in a data-scarce semi-arid area, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2007–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2007-2011, 2011.
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H. V., Hughes, D. A., Hut, R. W., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P. A., Uhlenbrook, S., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H. C., Woods, R. A., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C.: A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1198–1255, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183, 2013.
Karjalainen, T. P., Rossi, P. M., Ala-aho, P., Eskelinen, R., Reinikainen, K., Kløve, B., Pulido-Velazquez, M., and Yang, H.: A decision analysis framework for stakeholder involvement and learning in groundwater management, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5141–5153, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5141-2013, 2013.
Kongo, V. M., Kosgei, J. R., Jewitt, G. P. W., and Lorentz, S. A.: Establishment of a catchment monitoring network through a participatory approach in a rural community in South Africa, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2507–2525, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2507-2010, 2010.
Lane, S. N.: Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014.
Lasage, R., Aerts, J., Mutiso, G.-C., and De Vries, A.: Potential for community based adaptations to droughts: sand dams in Kitui, Kenya, Phys. Chem. Earth, 33, 67–73, 2008.
Leahy, J. E. and Anderson, D. H.: Trust factors in community–water resource management agency relationships, Landsc. Urban Plan., 87, 100–107, 2008.
Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (Eds.): The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 3–12, 1975.
Mackenzie, J., Tan, P.-L., Hoverman, S., and Baldwin, C.: The Value and Limitations of Participatory Action Research Methodology, J. Hydrol., 474, 11–12, 2012.
McGuire, K. and McDonnell, J.: Stable Isotope Tracers in Watershed Hydrology, in: Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science, Second Edition, edited by: Michener, R. and Lajtha, K., Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, 334–365, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470691854.ch11, 2007.
Merz, B., Vorogushyn, S., Lall, U., Viglione, A., and Bloeschl, G.: Charting unknown waters – On the role of surprise in flood risk assessment and management, Water Resour. Res., 51, 6399–6416, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017464, 2015.
Mul, M. L., Savenije, H. H. G., and Uhlenbrook, S.: Spatial rainfall variability and runoff response during an extreme event in a semi-arid catchment in the South Pare Mountains, Tanzania, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1659–1670, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1659-2009, 2009.
Phalla, C. and Paradis, S.: Use of Hydrological Knowledge and Community Participation for Improving Decision-making on Irrigation Water Allocation, Working Paper Series No. 49, A CDRI Publication, 2011.
Poolman M. I.: Present & Future: Visualising ideas of water infrastructure design. PhD Thesis Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2011.
Porchet, M. and Laferrere, H.: Détermination des caractéristiques hydrodynamiques des sols en place. Mémoire et notes techniques. Annales du Ministère de l'Agriculture, France, 64, 5–68, 1935.
Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., and Stringer, L. C.: What is social learning?, Ecol. Soc., 15, r1, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/, 2010.
Rodela, R., Cundill, G., and Wals, A. E. J.: An analysis of the methodological underpinnings of social learning research in natural resource management, Ecol. Econ., 77, 16–26, 2012.
Rodgers, P., Soulsby, C., Waldron, S., and Tetzlaff, D.: Using stable isotope tracers to assess hydrological flow paths, residence times and landscape influences in a nested mesoscale catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 9, 139–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-139-2005, 2005.
Sassone, P. G.: Cost-Benefit Analysis – A Handbook, Academic Press, New York, USA, 190 pp., 1978.
Scheer, S. H.: Communication between irrigation engineers and farmers: the case of project design in North Senegal, PhD thesis, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, 1996.
Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M. T., and Šejna, M.: Development and Applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes, Vadose Zone J., 7, 587–600, 2008.
Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S. W., Gupta, V. K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., McDonnell, J. J., Mendiondo, E. M., O'Connell, P. E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS Decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 857–880, 2003.
Sivapalan, M., Konar, M., Srinivasan, V., Chhatre, A., Wutich, A., Scott, C. A., Wescoat, J. L., and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I.: Socio-hydrology: Use-inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene, Earth. Future, 2, 225–230, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000164, 2014.
Soulsby, C., Neal, C., Laudon, H., Burns, D. A., Merot, P., Bonell, M., Dunn, S. M., and Tetzlaff, D.: Catchment data for process conceptualization: simply not enough?, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2057–2061, 2008.
Srinivasan, L.: Tools for Communication Participation: A Manual for Training Trainers in Participatory Techniques: PROWESS/UNDP-World Bank Water and Sanitation Program, 167 pp., 1990.
Srinivasan, V., Thompson, S., Madhyastha, K., Penny, G., Jeremiah, K., and Lele, S.: Why is the Arkavathy River drying? A multiple-hypothesis approach in a data-scarce region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1905–1917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1905-2015, 2015.
Thompson, S. E., Sivapalan, M., Harman, C. J., Srinivasan, V., Hipsey, M. R., Reed, P., Montanari, A., and Blöschl, G.: Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5013–5039, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5013-2013, 2013.
Van Koppen, B.: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Infrastructure for Growth and Development, International Water Management Institute, Southern Africa Regional Program, Pretoria, South Africa, 12 pp., 2009.
Verbist, K., Cornelis, W. M., Gabriels, D., Alaerts, K., and Soto, G.: Using an inverse modelling approach to evaluate the water retention in a simple water harvesting technique, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1979–1992, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1979-2009, 2009.
Vincent, L. F.: Towards a smallholder hydrology for equitable and sustainable water management, Natural Resources Forum, 27, 108–116, https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00046, 2003.
Von Korff, Y., Daniell, K. A., Moellenkamp, S., Bots, P., and Bijlsma, R. M.: Implementing participatory water management: recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation, Ecol. Soc., 17, 30, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04733-170130, 2012.
Warner, D. B. and Abate, C. G.: Guidelines for the Development of Small-Scale Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Projects in East Africa, Catholic Relief Services, Nairobi, Kenya, 51 pp., 2005.
Winsemius, H.: Interactive comment on "HESS Opinions "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"" by P. van der Zaag et al., Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, C342–C345, 2009.
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated...
