Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
Download
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.
Articles | Volume 20, issue 10
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4093–4115, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4093-2016

Research article 10 Oct 2016

Research article | 10 Oct 2016

Towards systematic planning of small-scale hydrological intervention-based research

Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana and Maurits Willem Ertsen

Viewed

Total article views: 1,436 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
820 563 53 1,436 53 57
  • HTML: 820
  • PDF: 563
  • XML: 53
  • Total: 1,436
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 57
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Apr 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Apr 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 20 Jan 2021
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The effects of human actions in small-scale water development initiatives and the associated hydrological research activities are basically unspecified. We argue that more explicit attention helps to design more appropriate answers to the challenges faced in field studies. A more systematic approach is proposed that would be useful when designing field projects: two sets of questions on (1) dealing with surprises and (2) cost–benefits of data gathering.
Citation