Articles | Volume 17, issue 8
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3279–3293, 2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Statistical methods for hydrological applications
21 Aug 2013
Research article | 21 Aug 2013
Assessing parameter importance of the Common Land Model based on qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis
J. Li et al.
W. Gong, Q. Duan, J. Li, C. Wang, Z. Di, Y. Dai, A. Ye, and C. Miao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2409–2425,
Jun Wang, John C. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, and Zhenhua Di
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss.,
Preprint under review for ESDShort summary
We examine how geoengineering using aerosols in the atmosphere might impact urban climate in the greater Beijing region containing over 50 million people. Climate models have too coarse resolutions to resolve regional variations well, so we compare two work arounds for this – an expensive physical model, and a cheaper statistical method. The statistical method generally gives a reasonable representation of climate, has limited resolution, and a different seasonality from the physical model.
Liren Wei, Duoying Ji, Chiyuan Miao, Helene Muri, and John C. Moore
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16033–16050,Short summary
We analyzed streamflow and flood frequency under the stratospheric aerosol geoengineering scenario simulated by climate models. Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering appears to reduce flood risk in most regions, but the overall effects are largely determined by the large-scale geographic pattern. Over the Amazon, stratospheric aerosol geoengineering ameliorates the drying trend here under a future warming climate.
Feng Ma, Lifeng Luo, Aizhong Ye, and Qingyun Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5697–5709,Short summary
Predicting meteorological droughts more than 2 months in advance became difficult due to low predictability, leading to weak skill for hydrological droughts in wet seasons. Hydrological drought forecasts showed skills up to 3–6 lead months due to the memory of initial hydrologic conditions in dry seasons. Human activities have increased hydrological predictability during wet seasons in the MHRB. This fills gaps in understanding drought and predictability predictions in endorheic and arid basins.
Xing Yuan, Feng Ma, Linying Wang, Ziyan Zheng, Zhuguo Ma, Aizhong Ye, and Shaoming Peng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2437–2451,Short summary
An experimental seasonal hydrological forecasting system is established over the Yellow River basin to provide adaptive support in a changing environment. The system consists of downscaled NMME climate prediction, hydrological models calibrated against naturalized streamflow along the mainstream, and a post-processor to account for the human interventions implicitly. As the first paper of a two-part series, this paper investigates the hydrological predictability by using reverse ESP simulations.
Y. Y. Zhang, Q. X. Shao, A. Z. Ye, H. T. Xing, and J. Xia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 529–553,Short summary
We developed an integrated water system model by coupling multiple water-related processes in hydrology, biogeochemistry, water quality and ecology, and considering the interference of human activities. The parameter sensitivity and autocalibration modules were also developed to improve the simulation efficiency. The proposed model was applied in the Shaying River catchment, which is a highly regulated and heavily polluted region in China.
W. Gong, Q. Duan, J. Li, C. Wang, Z. Di, Y. Dai, A. Ye, and C. Miao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2409–2425,
A. J. Newman, M. P. Clark, K. Sampson, A. Wood, L. E. Hay, A. Bock, R. J. Viger, D. Blodgett, L. Brekke, J. R. Arnold, T. Hopson, and Q. Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 209–223,Short summary
The focus of this paper is to (1) present a community data set of daily forcing and hydrologic response data for 671 unimpaired basins across the contiguous United States that spans a very wide range of hydroclimatic conditions, and (2) provide a calibrated model performance benchmark using a common conceptual snow and hydrologic modeling system. This benchmark provides a reference level of model performance across a very large basin sample and highlights regional variations in performance.
Y. Mao, A. Ye, J. Xu, F. Ma, X. Deng, C. Miao, W. Gong, and Z. Di
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Q. Zhang, A. J. Pitman, Y. P. Wang, Y. J. Dai, and P. J. Lawrence
Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 333–345,
Related subject area
Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysisQuantifying the uncertainty of precipitation forecasting using probabilistic deep learningUnraveling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate changeExploring hydrologic post-processing of ensemble streamflow forecasts based on affine kernel dressing and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm IIChoosing between post-processing precipitation forecasts or chaining several uncertainty quantification tools in hydrological forecasting systemsPerformance of the Global Forecast System's medium-range precipitation forecasts in the Niger river basin using multiple satellite-based productsUncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate changeBias-correcting input variables enhances forecasting of reference crop evapotranspirationUncertainty of gridded precipitation and temperature reference datasets in climate change impact studiesAt which timescale does the complementary principle perform best in evaporation estimation?Uncertainty in nonstationary frequency analysis of South Korea's daily rainfall peak over threshold excesses associated with covariatesAssessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variabilityThe accuracy of weather radar in heavy rain: a comparative study for Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and SwedenA new uncertainty estimation approach with multiple datasets and implementation for various precipitation productsA crash-testing framework for predictive uncertainty assessment when forecasting high flows in an extrapolation contextRequired sampling density of ground-based soil moisture and brightness temperature observations for calibration and validation of L-band satellite observations based on a virtual realityResponse of global evaporation to major climate modes in historical and future Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 simulationsCross-validating precipitation datasets in the Indus River basinSelection of multi-model ensemble of general circulation models for the simulation of precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature based on spatial assessment metricsAssessment of spatial uncertainty of heavy rainfall at catchment scale using a dense gauge networkInfluence of three phases of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on daily precipitation regimes in ChinaDual-polarized quantitative precipitation estimation as a function of rangeReconstruction of droughts in India using multiple land-surface models (1951–2015)Relative effects of statistical preprocessing and postprocessing on a regional hydrological ensemble prediction systemExploratory studies into seasonal flow forecasting potential for large lakesEvaluation of multiple forcing data sets for precipitation and shortwave radiation over major land areas of ChinaVerification of ECMWF System 4 for seasonal hydrological forecasting in a northern climateProviding a non-deterministic representation of spatial variability of precipitation in the Everest regionInter-comparison of daily precipitation products for large-scale hydro-climatic applications over CanadaSensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zonesCharacteristics of rainfall events in regional climate model simulations for the Czech RepublicThe rainfall erosivity factor in the Czech Republic and its uncertaintyHierarchy of climate and hydrological uncertainties in transient low-flow projectionsWillingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast: a risk-based decision-making gameAssessment of small-scale variability of rainfall and multi-satellite precipitation estimates using measurements from a dense rain gauge network in Southeast IndiaComparing CFSR and conventional weather data for discharge and soil loss modelling with SWAT in small catchments in the Ethiopian HighlandsUncertainties in calculating precipitation climatology in East AsiaMeasurement and interpolation uncertainties in rainfall maps from cellular communication networksCharacterization of precipitation product errors across the United States using multiplicative triple collocationExploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis frameworkEvaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation propertiesMulti-objective parameter optimization of common land model using adaptive surrogate modelingTesting gridded land precipitation data and precipitation and runoff reanalyses (1982–2010) between 45° S and 45° N with normalised difference vegetation index dataEvaluation of high-resolution precipitation analyses using a dense station networkPrediction of extreme floods based on CMIP5 climate models: a case study in the Beijiang River basin, South ChinaEstimating the water needed to end the drought or reduce the drought severity in the Carpathian regionAlternative configurations of quantile regression for estimating predictive uncertainty in water level forecasts for the upper Severn River: a comparisonComparison of drought indicators derived from multiple data sets over AfricaThe potential of radar-based ensemble forecasts for flash-flood early warning in the southern Swiss AlpsDo probabilistic forecasts lead to better decisions?Radar subpixel-scale rainfall variability and uncertainty: lessons learned from observations of a dense rain-gauge network
Lei Xu, Nengcheng Chen, Chao Yang, Hongchu Yu, and Zeqiang Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2923–2938,Short summary
Precipitation forecasting has potential uncertainty due to data and model uncertainties. Here, an integrated predictive uncertainty modeling framework is proposed by jointly considering data and model uncertainties through an uncertainty propagation theorem. The results indicate an effective predictive uncertainty estimation for precipitation forecasting, indicating the great potential for uncertainty quantification of numerous predictive applications.
Thibault Lemaitre-Basset, Ludovic Oudin, Guillaume Thirel, and Lila Collet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2147–2159,Short summary
Increasing temperature will impact evaporation and water resource management. Hydrological models are fed with an estimation of the evaporative demand of the atmosphere, called potential evapotranspiration (PE). The objectives of this study were (1) to compute the future PE anomaly over France and (2) to determine the impact of the choice of the method to estimate PE. Our results show that all methods present similar future trends. No method really stands out from the others.
Jing Xu, François Anctil, and Marie-Amélie Boucher
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1001–1017,Short summary
The performance of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is compared with a conventional post-processing method of affine kernel dressing. NSGA-II showed its superiority in improving the forecast skill and communicating trade-offs with end-users. It allows the enhancement of the forecast quality since it allows for setting multiple specific objectives from scratch. This flexibility should be considered as a reason to implement hydrologic ensemble prediction systems (H-EPSs).
Emixi Sthefany Valdez, François Anctil, and Maria-Helena Ramos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 197–220,Short summary
We investigated how a precipitation post-processor interacts with other tools for uncertainty quantification in a hydrometeorological forecasting chain. Four systems were implemented to generate 7 d ensemble streamflow forecasts, which vary from partial to total uncertainty estimation. Overall analysis showed that post-processing and initial condition estimation ensure the most skill improvements, in some cases even better than a system that considers all sources of uncertainty.
Haowen Yue, Mekonnen Gebremichael, and Vahid Nourani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 167–181,Short summary
The development of high-resolution global precipitation forecasts and the lack of reliable precipitation forecasts over Africa motivates this work to evaluate the precipitation forecasts from the Global Forecast System (GFS) over the Niger river basin in Africa. The GFS forecasts, at a 15 d accumulation timescale, have an acceptable performance; however, the forecasts are highly biased. It is recommended to apply bias correction to GFS forecasts before their application.
Hadush Meresa, Conor Murphy, Rowan Fealy, and Saeed Golian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5237–5257,Short summary
The assessment of future impacts of climate change is associated with a cascade of uncertainty linked to the modelling chain employed in assessing local-scale changes. Understanding and quantifying this cascade is essential for developing effective adaptation actions. We find that not only do the contributions of different sources of uncertainty vary by catchment, but that the dominant sources of uncertainty can be very different on a catchment-by-catchment basis.
Qichun Yang, Quan J. Wang, Kirsti Hakala, and Yating Tang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4773–4788,Short summary
Forecasts of water losses from land surface to the air are highly valuable for water resource management and planning. In this study, we aim to fill a critical knowledge gap in the forecasting of evaporative water loss. Model experiments across Australia clearly suggest the necessity of correcting errors in input variables for more reliable water loss forecasting. We anticipate that the strategy developed in our work will benefit future water loss forecasting and lead to more skillful forecasts.
Mostafa Tarek, François Brissette, and Richard Arsenault
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3331–3350,Short summary
It is not known how much uncertainty the choice of a reference data set may bring to impact studies. This study compares precipitation and temperature data sets to evaluate the uncertainty contribution to the results of climate change studies. Results show that all data sets provide good streamflow simulations over the reference period. The reference data sets also provided uncertainty that was equal to or larger than that related to general circulation models over most of the catchments.
Liming Wang, Songjun Han, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 375–386,Short summary
It remains unclear at which timescale the complementary principle performs best in estimating evaporation. In this study, evaporation estimation was assessed over 88 eddy covariance monitoring sites at multiple timescales. The results indicate that the generalized complementary functions perform best in estimating evaporation at the monthly scale. This study provides a reference for choosing a suitable time step for evaporation estimations in relevant studies.
Okjeong Lee, Jeonghyeon Choi, Jeongeun Won, and Sangdan Kim
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5077–5093,Short summary
The uncertainty of the model interpreting rainfall extremes with temperature is analyzed. The performance of the model focuses on the reliability of the output. It has been found that the selection of temperatures suitable for extreme levels plays an important role in improving model reliability. Based on this, a methodology is proposed to quantify the degree of uncertainty inherent in the change in rainfall extremes due to global warming.
Chao Gao, Martijn J. Booij, and Yue-Ping Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3251–3269,Short summary
This paper studies the impact of climate change on high and low flows and quantifies the contribution of uncertainty sources from representative concentration pathways (RCPs), global climate models (GCMs) and internal climate variability in extreme flows. Internal climate variability was reflected in a stochastic rainfall model. The results show the importance of internal climate variability and GCM uncertainty in high flows and GCM and RCP uncertainty in low flows especially for the far future.
Marc Schleiss, Jonas Olsson, Peter Berg, Tero Niemi, Teemu Kokkonen, Søren Thorndahl, Rasmus Nielsen, Jesper Ellerbæk Nielsen, Denica Bozhinova, and Seppo Pulkkinen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3157–3188,Short summary
A multinational assessment of radar's ability to capture heavy rain events is conducted. In total, six different radar products in Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden were considered. Results show a fair agreement, with radar underestimating by 17 %-44 % on average compared with gauges. Despite being adjusted for bias, five of six radar products still exhibited strong conditional biases with intensities of 1–2% per mm/h. Median peak intensity bias was significantly higher, reaching 44 %–67%.
Xudong Zhou, Jan Polcher, Tao Yang, and Ching-Sheng Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2061–2081,Short summary
This article proposes a new estimation approach for assessing the uncertainty with multiple datasets by fully considering all variations in temporal and spatial dimensions. Comparisons demonstrate that classical metrics may underestimate the uncertainties among datasets due to an averaging process in their algorithms. This new approach is particularly suitable for overall assessment of multiple climatic products, but can be easily applied to other spatiotemporal products in related fields.
Lionel Berthet, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Julie Viatgé, Renaud Marty, and Olivier Piotte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2017–2041,Short summary
An increasing number of flood forecasting services assess and communicate the uncertainty associated with their forecasts. We present a crash-testing framework that evaluates the quality of hydrological forecasts in an extrapolation context. Overall, the results highlight the challenge of uncertainty quantification when forecasting high flows. They show a significant drop in reliability when forecasting high flows and considerable variability among catchments and across lead times.
Shaoning Lv, Bernd Schalge, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, and Clemens Simmer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1957–1973,Short summary
Passive remote sensing of soil moisture has good potential to improve weather forecasting via data assimilation in theory. We use the virtual reality data set (VR01) to infer the impact of sampling density on soil moisture ground cal/val activity. It shows how the sampling error is growing with an increasing sampling distance for a SMOS–SMAP scale footprint in about 40 km, 9 km, and 3 km. The conclusion will help in understanding the passive remote sensing soil moisture products.
Thanh Le and Deg-Hyo Bae
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1131–1143,Short summary
Here we investigate the response of global evaporation to main climate modes, including the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Our results indicate that ENSO is an important driver of evaporation for many regions, while the impacts of NAO and IOD are substantial. This study allows us to obtain insight about the predictability of evaporation and, hence, may help to improve the early-warning systems of climate extremes.
Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Michael Herzog, and Cameron A. Petrie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 427–450,Short summary
The amount of precipitation falling in the Indus River basin remains uncertain while its variability impacts 100 million inhabitants. A comparison of datasets from diverse sources (ground remote observations, model outputs) reduces this uncertainty significantly. Grounded observations offer the most reliable long-term variability but with important underestimation in winter over the mountains. By contrast, recent model outputs offer better estimations of total amount and short-term variability.
Kamal Ahmed, Dhanapala A. Sachindra, Shamsuddin Shahid, Mehmet C. Demirel, and Eun-Sung Chung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4803–4824,Short summary
This study evaluated the performance of 36 CMIP5 GCMs in simulating seasonal precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature over Pakistan using spatial metrics (SPAtial EFficiency, fractions skill score, Goodman–Kruskal's lambda, Cramer's V, Mapcurves, and Kling–Gupta efficiency) for the period 1961–2005. NorESM1-M, MIROC5, BCC-CSM1-1, and ACCESS1-3 were identified as the most suitable GCMs for simulating all three climate variables over Pakistan.
Sungmin O and Ulrich Foelsche
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2863–2875,Short summary
We analyze heavy local rainfall to address questions regarding the spatial uncertainty due to the approximation of areal rainfall using point measurements. Ten years of rainfall data from a dense network of 150 rain gauges in southeastern Austria are employed, which permits robust examination of small-scale rainfall at various horizontal resolutions. Quantitative uncertainty information from the study can guide both data users and producers to estimate uncertainty in their own rainfall dataset.
Aifeng Lv, Bo Qu, Shaofeng Jia, and Wenbin Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 883–896,Short summary
ENSO-related changes in daily precipitation regimes are currently ignored by the scientific community. We analyzed the anomalies of daily precipitation and hydrological extremes caused by different phases of ENSO events, as well as the possible driving mechanisms, to reveal the influence of ENSO on China's daily precipitation regimes. Our results provide a valuable tool for daily precipitation prediction and enable the prioritization of adaptation efforts ahead of extreme events in China.
Micheal J. Simpson and Neil I. Fox
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3375–3389,Short summary
Many researchers have expressed that one of the main difficulties in modeling watershed hydrology is that of obtaining continuous, widespread weather input data, especially precipitation. The overarching objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive study of three weather radars as a function of range. We found that radar-estimated precipitation was best at ranges between 100 and 150 km from the radar, with different radar parameters being superior at varying distances from the radar.
Vimal Mishra, Reepal Shah, Syed Azhar, Harsh Shah, Parth Modi, and Rohini Kumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2269–2284,
Sanjib Sharma, Ridwan Siddique, Seann Reed, Peter Ahnert, Pablo Mendoza, and Alfonso Mejia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1831–1849,Short summary
We investigate the relative roles of statistical weather preprocessing and streamflow postprocessing in hydrological ensemble forecasting at short- to medium-range forecast lead times (day 1–7). For this purpose, we develop and implement a regional hydrologic ensemble prediction system (RHEPS). Overall analysis shows that implementing both preprocessing and postprocessing ensures the most skill improvements, but postprocessing alone can often be a competitive alternative.
Kevin Sene, Wlodek Tych, and Keith Beven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 127–141,Short summary
The theme of the paper is exploration of the potential for seasonal flow forecasting for large lakes using a range of stochastic transfer function techniques with additional insights gained from simple analytical approximations. The methods were evaluated using records for two of the largest lakes in the world. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relevance of the results to operational flow forecasting systems for other large lakes.
Fan Yang, Hui Lu, Kun Yang, Jie He, Wei Wang, Jonathon S. Wright, Chengwei Li, Menglei Han, and Yishan Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5805–5821,Short summary
In this paper, we show that CLDAS has the highest spatial and temporal resolution, and it performs best in terms of precipitation, while it overestimates the shortwave radiation. CMFD also has high resolution and its shortwave radiation data match well with the station data; its annual-mean precipitation is reliable but its monthly precipitation needs improvements. Both GLDAS and CN05.1 over mainland China need to be improved. The results can benefit researchers for forcing data selection.
Rachel Bazile, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Luc Perreault, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5747–5762,Short summary
Meteorological forecasting agencies constantly work on pushing the limit of predictability farther in time. However, some end users need proof that climate model outputs are ready to be implemented operationally. We show that bias correction is crucial for the use of ECMWF System4 forecasts for the studied area and there is a potential for the use of 1-month-ahead forecasts. Beyond this, forecast performance is equivalent to using past climatology series as inputs to the hydrological model.
Judith Eeckman, Pierre Chevallier, Aaron Boone, Luc Neppel, Anneke De Rouw, Francois Delclaux, and Devesh Koirala
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4879–4893,Short summary
The central part of the Himalayan Range presents tremendous heterogeneity in terms of topography and climatology, but the representation of hydro-climatic processes for Himalayan catchments is limited due to a lack of knowledge in such poorly instrumented environments. The proposed approach is to characterize the effect of altitude on precipitation by considering ensembles of acceptable altitudinal factors. Ensembles of acceptable values for the components of the water cycle are then provided.
Jefferson S. Wong, Saman Razavi, Barrie R. Bonsal, Howard S. Wheater, and Zilefac E. Asong
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2163–2185,Short summary
This study was conducted to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of the errors associated with various gridded precipitation products in Canada. Overall, WFDEI [GPCC] and CaPA performed best with respect to different performance measures, followed by ANUSPLIN and WEDEI [CRU]. Princeton and NARR demonstrated the lowest quality. Comparing the climate model-simulated products, PCIC ensembles generally performed better than NA-CORDEX ensembles in terms of reliability in four seasons.
Danlu Guo, Seth Westra, and Holger R. Maier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2107–2126,Short summary
This study assessed the impact of baseline climate conditions on the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration (PET) to a large range of plausible changes in temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation and wind speed at 30 Australian locations. Around 2-fold greater PET changes were observed at cool and humid locations compared to others, indicating potential for elevated water loss in the future. These impacts can be useful to inform the selection of PET models under a changing climate.
Vojtěch Svoboda, Martin Hanel, Petr Máca, and Jan Kyselý
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 963–980,Short summary
The study presents validation of precipitation events as simulated by an ensemble of regional climate models for the Czech Republic. While the number of events per season, seasonal total precipitation due to heavy events and the distribution of rainfall depths are simulated relatively well, event maximum precipitation and event intensity are strongly underestimated. This underestimation cannot be explained by scale mismatch between point observations and area average (climate model simulations).
Martin Hanel, Petr Máca, Petr Bašta, Radek Vlnas, and Pavel Pech
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4307–4322,Short summary
The paper is focused on assessment of the contribution of various sources of uncertainty to the estimated rainfall erosivity factor. It is shown that the rainfall erosivity factor can be estimated with reasonable precision even from records shorter than recommended, provided good spatial coverage and reasonable explanatory variables are available. The research was done as an update of the R factor estimates for the Czech Republic, which were later used for climate change assessment.
Jean-Philippe Vidal, Benoît Hingray, Claire Magand, Eric Sauquet, and Agnès Ducharne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3651–3672,Short summary
Possible transient futures of winter and summer low flows for two snow-influenced catchments in the southern French Alps show a strong decrease signal. It is however largely masked by the year-to-year variability, which should be the main target for defining adaptation strategies. Responses of different hydrological models strongly diverge in the future, suggesting to carefully check the robustness of evapotranspiration and snowpack components under a changing climate.
Louise Arnal, Maria-Helena Ramos, Erin Coughlan de Perez, Hannah Louise Cloke, Elisabeth Stephens, Fredrik Wetterhall, Schalk Jan van Andel, and Florian Pappenberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3109–3128,Short summary
Forecasts are produced as probabilities of occurrence of specific events, which is both an added value and a challenge for users. This paper presents a game on flood protection, "How much are you prepared to pay for a forecast?", which investigated how users perceive the value of forecasts and are willing to pay for them when making decisions. It shows that users are mainly influenced by the perceived quality of the forecasts, their need for the information and their degree of risk tolerance.
K. Sunilkumar, T. Narayana Rao, and S. Satheeshkumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1719–1735,
Vincent Roth and Tatenda Lemann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 921–934,Short summary
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) suggests using the CFSR global rainfall data for modelling discharge and soil erosion in data-scarce parts of the world. These data are freely available and ready to use for SWAT modelling. However, simulations with the CFSR data in the Ethiopian Highlands were unable to represent the specific regional climates and showed high discrepancies. This article compares SWAT simulations with conventional rainfall data and with CFSR rainfall data.
J. Kim and S. K. Park
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 651–658,Short summary
This study examined the uncertainty in climatological precipitation in East Asia, calculated from five gridded analysis data sets based on in situ rain gauge observations from 1980 to 2007. It is found that the regions of large uncertainties are typically lightly populated and are characterized by severe terrain and/or very high elevations. Thus, care must be taken in using long-term trends calculated from gridded precipitation analysis data for climate studies over such regions in East Asia.
M. F. Rios Gaona, A. Overeem, H. Leijnse, and R. Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3571–3584,Short summary
Commercial cellular networks are built for telecommunication purposes. These kinds of networks have lately been used to obtain rainfall maps at country-wide scales. From previous studies, we now quantify the uncertainties associated with such maps. To do so, we divided the sources or error into two categories: from microwave link measurements and from mapping. It was found that the former is the source that contributes the most to the overall error in rainfall maps from microwave link network.
S. H. Alemohammad, K. A. McColl, A. G. Konings, D. Entekhabi, and A. Stoffelen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3489–3503,Short summary
This paper introduces a new variant of the triple collocation technique with multiplicative error model. The method is applied, for the first time, to precipitation products across the central part of continental USA. Results show distinctive patterns of error variance in each product that are estimated without a priori assumption of any of the error distributions. The correlation coefficients between each product and the truth are also estimated, which provides another performance perspective.
M. S. Raleigh, J. D. Lundquist, and M. P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179,Short summary
A sensitivity analysis is used to examine how error characteristics (type, distributions, and magnitudes) in meteorological forcing data impact outputs from a physics-based snow model in four climates. Bias and error magnitudes were key factors in model sensitivity and precipitation bias often dominated. However, the relative importance of forcings depended somewhat on the selected model output. Forcing uncertainty was comparable to model structural uncertainty as found in other studies.
S. Garrigues, A. Olioso, J. C. Calvet, E. Martin, S. Lafont, S. Moulin, A. Chanzy, O. Marloie, S. Buis, V. Desfonds, N. Bertrand, and D. Renard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3109–3131,Short summary
Land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration are assessed over a 12-year Mediterranean crop succession. Evapotranspiration mainly results from soil evaporation when it is simulated over a Mediterranean crop succession. This leads to a high sensitivity to the soil parameters. Errors on soil hydraulic properties can lead to a large bias in cumulative evapotranspiration over a long period of time. Accounting for uncertainties in soil properties is essential for land surface modelling.
W. Gong, Q. Duan, J. Li, C. Wang, Z. Di, Y. Dai, A. Ye, and C. Miao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2409–2425,
S. O. Los
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1713–1725,Short summary
The study evaluates annual precipitation (largely rainfall) amounts for the tropics and subtropics; precipitation was obtained from ground observations, satellite observations and numerical weather forecasting models. - Annual precipitation amounts from ground and satellite observations were the most realistic. - Newer weather forecasting models better predicted annual precipitation than older models. - Weather forecasting models predicted inaccurate precipitation amounts for Africa.
A. Kann, I. Meirold-Mautner, F. Schmid, G. Kirchengast, J. Fuchsberger, V. Meyer, L. Tüchler, and B. Bica
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1547–1559,Short summary
The paper introduces a high resolution precipitation analysis system which operates on 1 km x 1 km resolution with high frequency updates of 5 minutes. The ability of such a system to adequately assess the convective precipitation distribution is evaluated by means of an independant, high resolution station network. This dense station network allows for a thorough evaluation of the analyses under different convective situations and of the representativeness error of raingaue measurements.
C. H. Wu, G. R. Huang, and H. J. Yu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1385–1399,
T. Antofie, G. Naumann, J. Spinoni, and J. Vogt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 177–193,
P. López López, J. S. Verkade, A. H. Weerts, and D. P. Solomatine
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3411–3428,
G. Naumann, E. Dutra, P. Barbosa, F. Pappenberger, F. Wetterhall, and J. V. Vogt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1625–1640,
K. Liechti, L. Panziera, U. Germann, and M. Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3853–3869,
M. H. Ramos, S. J. van Andel, and F. Pappenberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2219–2232,
N. Peleg, M. Ben-Asher, and E. Morin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2195–2208,
Anderson, E. A.: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover, NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS, 19, 1–150, 1976.
Bastidas, L. A., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Shuttleworth, W. J., and Yang, Z. L.: Sensitivity analysis of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19481–19490, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900155, 1999.
Bonan, G. B.: Land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description and user's guide, Technical note, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States), Clim. Global Dynam. Div., 159 pp., 1996.
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J., and Olshen, R. A.: Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Bota Raton, Florida, USA, 1984.
Campolongo, F. and Saltelli, A.: Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 57, 49–69, 1997.
Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., and Saltelli, A.: An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models, Environ. Modell. Softw., 22, 1509–1518, 2007.
Capaldo, K. P. and Pandis, S. N.: Dimethylsulfide chemistry in the remote marine atmosphere: evaluation and sensitivity analysis of available mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23251–23267, 1997.
Chipman, H. A., George, E. I., and McCulloch, R. E.: BART: Bayesian additive regression trees, Ann. Appl. Stat., 4, 266–298, 2010.
Clapp, R. B. and Hornberger, G. M.: Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties, Water Resour. Res., 14, 601–604, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i004p00601, 1978.
Collins, D. C. and Avissar, R.: An evaluation with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) of which land-surface parameters are of greatest importance in atmospheric modeling, J. Climate, 7, 681–703, 1994.
Confalonieri, R., Bellocchi, G., Bregaglio, S., Donatelli, M., and Acutis, M.: Comparison of sensitivity analysis techniques: a case study with the rice model WARM, Ecol. Modell., 221, 1897–1906, 2010.
Cosby, B., Hornberger, G., Clapp, R., and Ginn, T.: A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils, Water Resour. Res., 20, 682–690, 1984.
Dai, Y. and Zeng Q.: A land surface model (IAP94) for climate studies part I: formulation and validation in off-line experiments, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 14, 433–460, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-997-0063-4, 1997.
Dai, Y., Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Baker, I., Bonan, G. B., Bosilovich, M. G., Denning, A. S., Dirmeyer, P. A., Houser, P. R., and Niu, G.: The Common Land Model, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, 2003.
De Pauw, D. J. W., Steppe, K., and De Baets, B.: Unravelling the output uncertainty of a tree water flow and storage model using several global sensitivity analysis methods, Biosyst. Eng., 101, 87–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.05.011, 2008.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 6, 182–197, 2002.
Dickinson, R., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P.: Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1e as coupled to the NCAR community model, NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-387 + STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA, 72, 1993.
Dorman, J. and Sellers, P. J.: A global climatology of albedo, roughness length and stomatal resistance for atmospheric general circulation models as represented by the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB), J. Appl. Meteorol., 28, 833–855, 1989.
Duan, Q. Y., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S.: Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and effcient global minimization, J. Optimiz. Theory App., 76, 501–521, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939380, 1993.
Duan, Q., Schaake, J., and Koren, V.: A priori estimation of land surface model parameters, land surface hydrology, meteorology, and climate: observations and modeling, Water Sci. Appl., 3, 77–94, 2001.
Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R.: Calibration of Watershed Models, American Geophysical Union, Washington, USA, 345, 2003.
Duan, Q., Schaake, J., Andreassian, V., Franks, S., Goteti, G., Gupta, H. V., Gusev, Y. M., Habets, F., Hall, A., Hay, L., Hogue, T., Huang, M., Leavesley, G., Liang, X., Nasonova, O. N.,Noilhan, J., Oudin, L., Sorooshian, S., Wagener, T., and Wood, E. F.: Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): an overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops, J. Hydrol., 320, 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.031, 2006.
Eirola, E., Liiti'ainen, E., Lendasse, A., Corona, F., and Verleysen, M.: Using the delta test for variable selection, In: Proceedings of ESANN 2008/16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), 23–25 April 2008, 25–30, 2008.
Farouki, O. T.: Thermal properties of soils, Ser. Rock Soil Mech., 11, 1–136, 1986.
Franks, S. W. and Beven, K. J.: Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in land surface-atmosphere flux predictions, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23991–23999, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02011, 1997.
Friedman, J. H.: Multivariate adaptive regression splines, Ann. Stat., 19, 1–141, 1991.
Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA, USA, 1989.
Guillen, A., Sovilj, D., Lendasse, A., and Mateo, F.: Minimizing the delta test for variable selection in regression problems, Int. J. High Perform. Sys. Arch., 1, 269–281, 2008.
Gupta, H., Bastidas, L., Sorooshian, S., Shuttleworth, W., and Yang, Z.: Parameter estimation of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 491–503, 1999.
Hastings, W. K.: Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57, 97–109, 1970.
Henderson-Sellers, A.: Soil moisture: a critical focus for global change studies, Global Planet. Change, 13, 3–9, 1996.
Herman, J. D., Kollat, J. B., Reed, P. M., and Wagener, T.: Technical note: Method of Morris effectively reduces the computational demands of global sensitivity analysis for distributed watershed models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 10, 4275–4299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-4275-2013, 2013.
Homma, T. and Saltelli, A.: Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 52, 1–17, 1996.
Hou, Z., Huang, M., Leung, L. R., Lin, G., and Ricciuto, D. M.: Sensitivity of surface flux simulations to hydrologic parameters based on an uncertainty quantification framework applied to the Community Land Model, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D15108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017521, 2012.
Hu, Z. Y., Ma, M. G., Jin, R., Wang, W. Z., Huang, G. H., Zhang, Z. H., and Tan, J. L.: WATER: dataset of automatic meteorological observations at the A'rou freeze/thaw observation station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, https://doi.org/10.3972/water973.0279.db, 2008.
Jackson, C., Xia, Y., Sen, M. K., and Stoffa, P. L.: Optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation of a land surface model: a case study using data from Cabauw, Netherlands, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4583, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002991, 2003.
Ji, D. Y. and Dai, Y. J.: The Common Land Model (CoLM) technical guide, Technical Report of Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 2010.
Jordan, R.: A one-dimensional temperature model for a snow cover: technical documentation for SNTHERM, 89, DTIC Document, US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Rep., USA, 91–16, 1991.
Lettenmaier, D., Lohmann, D., Wood, E., and Liang, X.: PILPS-2c workshop report, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ, 1996.
Liu, Y., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Bastidas, L. A., and Shuttleworth, W. J.: Constraining land surface and atmospheric parameters of a locally coupled model using observational data, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 156–172, 2005.
Massmann, C. and Holzmann, H.: Analysis of the behavior of a rainfall–runoff model using three global sensitivity analysis methods evaluated at different temporal scales, J. Hydrol., 475, 97–110, 2012.
McKay, M., Beckman, R., and Conover, W.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 42, 55–61, 2000.
Morris, M. D.: Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments, Technometrics, 33, 161–174, 1991.
Neumann, M. B.: Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for pollutant degradation modelling: A case study from drinking water treatment, Sci. Total Environ., 433, 530–537, 2012.
Pappenberger, F., Beven, K. J., Ratto, M., and Matgen, P.: Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1–14, 2008.
Parada, L. M., Fram, J. P., and Liang, X.: Multi-resolution calibration methodology for hydrologic models: application to a sub-humid catchment, Water Sci. Appl., 6, 197–211, 2003.
Patil, S. R. and Frey, H. C.: Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods based on applications to a food safety risk assessment model, Risk Anal., 24, 573–585, 2004.
Pi, H. and Peterson, C.: Finding the embedding dimension and variable dependencies in time series, Neural Comput., 6, 509–520, 1994.
Ravalico, J. K., Maier, H. R., Dandy, G. C., Norton, J. P., and Croke, B. F. W.: A Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Complex Models for Environmental Management, Univ. Western Australia, Nedlands, 2005.
Rosolem, R., Gupta, H. V., Shuttleworth, W. J., Zeng, X., and de Gonçalves, L. G. G.: A fully multiple-criteria implementation of the Sobol' method for parameter sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D07103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016355, 2012.
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M.: Sensitivity Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2000.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., and Ratto, M.: Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: a Guide to Assessing Scientific Models, Wiley, New York, USA, 2004.
Shahsavani, D., Tarantola, S., and Ratto, M.: Evaluation of MARS modeling technique for sensitivity analysis of model output, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 7737–7738, 2010.
Sobol', I. M.: Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models, Math. Mod. Comput. Exp., 1, 407–414, 1993.
Sobol', I. M.: Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Math. Comput. Simulat., 55, 271–280, 2001.
Statnikov, R. B. and Matusov, J. B.: Multicriteria Analysis in Engineering: Using the PSI Method with MOVI 1.0, Springer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002.
Steinberg, D., Colla, P., and Martin, K.: MARS User Guide, Salford Systems, San Diego, CA, 1999.
Storlie, C. B., Swiler, L. P., Helton, J. C., and Sallaberry, C. J.: Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 94, 1735–1763, 2009.
Sun, X. Y., Newham, L. T. H., Croke, B. F. W., and Norton, J. P.: Three complementary methods for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model, Environ. Modell. Softw., 37, 19–29, 2012.
Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T., and van Werkhoven, K.: Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 793–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-793-2007, 2007.
Tong, C.: PSUADE User's Manual, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, LLNL-SM-407882, Livermore, CA, USA, 2005.
Tong, C. and Graziani, F.: A practical global sensitivity analysis methodology for multi-physics applications, in: Computational Methods in Transport: Verification and Validation, 62, 277–299, 2008.
Turányi, T.: Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications, J. Math. Chem., 5, 203–248, 1990.
Vrugt, J. A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., Clark, M. P., Hyman, J. M., and Robinson, B. A.: Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Water Resour. Res, 44, W00B09, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006720, 2008.
Yamwong, W. and Achalakul, T.: Yield improvement analysis with parameter-screening factorials, Appl. Soft Comput., 12, 1021–1040, 2011.
Yuan, X. and Liang, X. Z.: Evaluation of a Conjunctive Surface-Subsurface Process model (CSSP) over the contiguous United States at regional-local scales, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 579–599, 2011.
Zhang, C., Chu, J., and Fu, G.: Sobol's sensitivity analysis for a distributed hydrological model of Yichun River Basin, China, J. Hydrol., 480, 58–68, 2013.