62 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Improved Land Evapotranspiration Simulation of the Community Land Model Using a Surrogate-Based Automatic Parameter Optimization Method C. Zhang et al. 10.3390/w12040943
2. Screening and Optimizing the Sensitive Parameters of BTOPMC Model Based on UQ-PyL Software: Case Study of a Flood Event in the Fuji River Basin, Japan L. Liu et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001970
3. Evaluation of Land Surface Subprocesses and Their Impacts on Model Performance With Global Flux Data J. Li et al. 10.1029/2018MS001606
4. Global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional problems: How to objectively group factors and measure robustness and convergence while reducing computational cost R. Sheikholeslami et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.002
5. Evaluation of parameter interaction effect of hydrological models using the sparse polynomial chaos (SPC) method H. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104612
6. Assessing WRF model parameter sensitivity: A case study with 5 day summer precipitation forecasting in the Greater Beijing Area Z. Di et al. 10.1002/2014GL061623
7. Distributed Evaluation of Local Sensitivity Analysis (DELSA), with application to hydrologic models O. Rakovec et al. 10.1002/2013WR014063
8. Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework M. Raleigh et al. 10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015
9. Quantifying Contributions of Uncertainties in Physical Parameterization Schemes and Model Parameters to Overall Errors in Noah‐MP Dynamic Vegetation Modeling J. Li et al. 10.1029/2019MS001914
10. Spatial Pattern Oriented Multicriteria Sensitivity Analysis of a Distributed Hydrologic Model M. Demirel et al. 10.3390/w10091188
11. An adaptive surrogate modeling-based sampling strategy for parameter optimization and distribution estimation (ASMO-PODE) W. Gong & Q. Duan 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.05.005
12. The impact of standard and hard‐coded parameters on the hydrologic fluxes in the Noah‐MP land surface model M. Cuntz et al. 10.1002/2016JD025097
13. Partitioning Global Surface Energy and Their Controlling Factors Based on Machine Learning X. Yuan et al. 10.3390/rs12223712
14. Sensitivity Analysis‐Based Automatic Parameter Calibration of the VIC Model for Streamflow Simulations Over China J. Gou et al. 10.1029/2019WR025968
15. Assessing the sensitivity of land-atmosphere coupling strength to boundary and surface layer parameters in the WRF model over Amazon C. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104738
16. An evaluation of parametric sensitivities of different meteorological variables simulated by the WRF model J. Quan et al. 10.1002/qj.2885
17. Uncertainty Quantification of WRF Model for Rainfall Prediction over the Sichuan Basin, China Y. Du et al. 10.3390/atmos13050838
18. Quantification and attribution of errors in the simulated annual gross primary production and latent heat fluxes by two global land surface models J. Li et al. 10.1002/2015MS000583
19. Reprint of: Active subspaces for sensitivity analysis and dimension reduction of an integrated hydrologic model J. Jefferson et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.11.002
20. Parametric Sensitivity and Uncertainty Quantification in the Version 1 of E3SM Atmosphere Model Based on Short Perturbed Parameter Ensemble Simulations Y. Qian et al. 10.1029/2018JD028927
21. A Combined Optimization‐Assimilation Framework to Enhance the Predictive Skill of Community Land Model C. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2021WR029879
22. Hydrological Modeling in the Upper Lancang-Mekong River Basin Using Global and Regional Gridded Meteorological Re-Analyses S. Zhang et al. 10.3390/w15122209
23. Mitigating El Niño impacts on hydro-energy vulnerability through identifying resilient run-of-river small hydropower sites C. Thakur et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101622
24. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Microwave Emissivity and Brightness Temperature Sensitivities to Soil Parameters Using Qualitative and Quantitative Sensitivity Analyses C. Ma et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2618903
25. Variance Based Sensitivity Analysis of FLake Lake Model for Global Land Surface Modeling A. Bernus et al. 10.1029/2019JD031928
26. Multi-objective parameter optimization of common land model using adaptive surrogate modeling W. Gong et al. 10.5194/hess-19-2409-2015
27. Process refinement contributed more than parameter optimization to improve the CoLM's performance in simulating the carbon and water fluxes in a grassland Y. Li et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108067
28. Assessment of WRF Model Parameter Sensitivity for High‐Intensity Precipitation Events During the Indian Summer Monsoon S. Chinta et al. 10.1029/2020EA001471
29. Coupling the Common Land Model to ECHAM5 Atmospheric General Circulation Model Y. Xin et al. 10.1007/s13351-019-8117-y
30. A new approach to identify the sensitivity and importance of physical parameters combination within numerical models using the Lund–Potsdam–Jena (LPJ) model as an example G. Sun & M. Mu 10.1007/s00704-015-1690-9
31. Synergistic Effects of High‐Resolution Factors for Improving Soil Moisture Simulations Over China P. Ji et al. 10.1029/2023WR035513
32. Assessing Parameter Importance of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Based On Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods D. Ji et al. 10.1002/2017JD027348
33. Comprehensive evaluation of parameter importance and optimization based on the integrated sensitivity analysis system: A case study of the BTOP model in the upper Min River Basin, China L. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127819
34. An automatic and effective parameter optimization method for model tuning T. Zhang et al. 10.5194/gmd-8-3579-2015
35. Spatial heterogeneity effects on land surface modeling of water and energy partitioning L. Li et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5489-2022
36. Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications X. Song et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.013
37. Analysis of parameter sensitivity on surface heat exchange in the Noah land surface model at a temperate desert steppe site in China G. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s13351-017-7050-1
38. Bayesian framework of parameter sensitivity, uncertainty, and identifiability analysis in complex water quality models H. Jia et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.001
39. Effect of sensitivity analysis on parameter optimization: Case study based on streamflow simulations using the SWAT model in China M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126896
40. A New Sensitivity Analysis Approach Using Conditional Nonlinear Optimal Perturbations and Its Preliminary Application Q. Ren et al. 10.1007/s00376-022-1445-3
41. Automatic Model Calibration: A New Way to Improve Numerical Weather Forecasting Y. Gan et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00104.1
42. Uncertainty quantification based cloud parameterization sensitivity analysis in the NCAR community atmosphere model R. Pathak et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-74441-x
43. Assessing the weighted multi-objective adaptive surrogate model optimization to derive large-scale reservoir operating rules with sensitivity analysis J. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.008
44. Model Variable Augmentation (MVA) for Diagnostic Assessment of Sensitivity Analysis Results J. Mai & B. Tolson 10.1029/2018WR023382
45. Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Computationally Intensive Spatially Distributed Dynamical Environmental Systems Models X. Huo et al. 10.1029/2018MS001573
46. Insights on geologic and vegetative controls over hydrologic behavior of a large complex basin – Global Sensitivity Analysis of an integrated parallel hydrologic model V. Srivastava et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.020
47. Identifying Sensitive Model Parameter Combinations for Uncertainties in Land Surface Process Simulations over the Tibetan Plateau F. Peng & G. Sun 10.3390/w11081724
48. Active subspaces for sensitivity analysis and dimension reduction of an integrated hydrologic model J. Jefferson et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.07.001
49. Impacts of Land Cover and Soil Texture Uncertainty on Land Model Simulations Over the Central Tibetan Plateau J. Li et al. 10.1029/2018MS001377
50. Assimilating multi-source data into land surface model to simultaneously improve estimations of soil moisture, soil temperature, and surface turbulent fluxes in irrigated fields C. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.013
51. Integrating partitioned evapotranspiration data into hydrologic models: Vegetation parameterization and uncertainty quantification of simulated plant water use A. Schreiner‐McGraw et al. 10.1002/hyp.14580
52. Stepwise sensitivity analysis from qualitative to quantitative: Application to the terrestrial hydrological modeling of a Conjunctive Surface‐Subsurface Process (CSSP) land surface model Y. Gan et al. 10.1002/2014MS000406
53. Uncertainty assessment and sensitivity analysis of soil moisture based on model parameter errors – Results from four regions in China G. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.059
54. Sensitivity analysis-based variable screening and reliability optimisation for composite fuselage frame crashworthiness design B. Gao et al. 10.1080/13588265.2018.1454289
55. A GUI platform for uncertainty quantification of complex dynamical models C. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.004
56. Multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling‐based optimization for parameter estimation of large, complex geophysical models W. Gong et al. 10.1002/2015WR018230
57. Evaluations of Uncertainty and Sensitivity in Soil Moisture Modeling on the Tibetan Plateau F. Peng et al. 10.1080/16000870.2019.1704963
58. Sensitivity analysis of the convective‐scale AROME model to physical and dynamical parameters M. Wimmer et al. 10.1002/qj.4239
59. Design Optimization with Variable Screening by Interval-Based Sensitivity Analysis Q. Chang et al. 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1266
60. Exploring the Sensitivity of Photosynthesis and Stomatal Resistance Parameters in a Land Surface Model J. Jefferson et al. 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0053.1
61. Practical Use of Computationally Frugal Model Analysis Methods M. Hill et al. 10.1111/gwat.12330
62. Uncertainty Quantification and Bayesian Inference of Cloud Parameterization in the NCAR Single Column Community Atmosphere Model (SCAM6) R. Pathak et al. 10.3389/fclim.2021.670740