Articles | Volume 30, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1865-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1865-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
09 Apr 2026
Research article |
| 09 Apr 2026
| 09 Apr 2026
Streamflow elasticity as a function of aridity
Vazken Andréassian
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, HYCAR Research Unit, Antony, France
Guilherme M. Guimarães
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, HYCAR Research Unit, Antony, France
Julien Lerat
CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
Alban de Lavenne
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, HYCAR Research Unit, Antony, France
Related authors
Antoine Degenne, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, and Vazken Andréassian
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1197, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1197, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We tested whether a simple model combining basic water balance principles with artificial intelligence can predict yearly river flow across many regions and years. Using data from over 3,000 river basins in eight countries, we found that the model works well when predicting future years in the same basin, but is less accurate in new regions because estimating long-term average flow remains difficult. This highlights both the promise and limits of this approach for large-scale water management.
Vazken Andréassian, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Alban de Lavenne, and Julien Lerat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5477–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using 4122 catchments from four continents, we investigate how annual streamflow depends on climate variables (rainfall and potential evaporation) and on the season when precipitation occurs, using an index representing the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation. In all countries and under the main climates represented, synchronicity is, after precipitation, the second most important factor in explaining annual streamflow variations.
Taha-Abderrahman El Ouahabi, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, and Vazken Andréassian
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3586, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3586, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To improve hydrological uncertainty estimation, recent studies have explored machine learning (ML)-based post-processing approaches. Among these, quantile random forests (QRF) are increasingly used for their balance between interpretability and performance. We develop a hydrologically informed QRF trained in a multi-site setting. Our results show that the regional QRF approach is beneficial, particularly in catchments where local information is insufficient.
Olivier Delaigue, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Pierre Brigode, Benoît Génot, Charles Perrin, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Bruno Janet, Nans Addor, and Vazken Andréassian
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1461–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This dataset covers 654 rivers all flowing in France. The provided time series and catchment attributes will be of interest to those modelers wishing to analyze hydrological behavior and perform model assessments.
Léonard Santos, Vazken Andréassian, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Göran Lindström, Alban de Lavenne, Charles Perrin, Lila Collet, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 683–700, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work investigates how hydrological models are transferred to a period in which climate conditions are different to the ones of the period in which they were set up. The robustness assessment test built to detect dependencies between model error and climatic drivers was applied to three hydrological models in 352 catchments in Denmark, France and Sweden. Potential issues are seen in a significant number of catchments for the models, even though the catchments differ for each model.
Thibault Hallouin, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Maria-Helena Ramos, and Vazken Andréassian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4561–4578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evaluation of the quality of hydrological model outputs against streamflow observations is widespread in the hydrological literature. In order to improve on the reproducibility of published studies, a new evaluation tool dedicated to hydrological applications is presented. It is open source and usable in a variety of programming languages to make it as accessible as possible to the community. Thus, authors and readers alike can use the same tool to produce and reproduce the results.
Ralph Bathelemy, Pierre Brigode, Vazken Andréassian, Charles Perrin, Vincent Moron, Cédric Gaucherel, Emmanuel Tric, and Dominique Boisson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2073–2098, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2073-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2073-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of this work is to provide the first hydroclimatic database for Haiti, a Caribbean country particularly vulnerable to meteorological and hydrological hazards. The resulting database, named Simbi, provides hydroclimatic time series for around 150 stations and 24 catchment areas.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling framework tested.
Alban de Lavenne, Vazken Andréassian, Louise Crochemore, Göran Lindström, and Berit Arheimer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2715–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A watershed remembers the past to some extent, and this memory influences its behavior. This memory is defined by the ability to store past rainfall for several years. By releasing this water into the river or the atmosphere, it tends to forget. We describe how this memory fades over time in France and Sweden. A few watersheds show a multi-year memory. It increases with the influence of groundwater or dry conditions. After 3 or 4 years, they behave independently of the past.
Antoine Pelletier and Vazken Andréassian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2733–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A large part of the water cycle takes place underground. In many places, the soil stores water during the wet periods and can release it all year long, which is particularly visible when the river level is low. Modelling tools that are used to simulate and forecast the behaviour of the river struggle to represent this. We improved an existing model to take underground water into account using measurements of the soil water content. Results allow us make recommendations for model users.
Paul Royer-Gaspard, Vazken Andréassian, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5703–5716, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5703-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5703-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Most evaluation studies based on the differential split-sample test (DSST) endorse the consensus that rainfall–runoff models lack climatic robustness. In this technical note, we propose a new performance metric to evaluate model robustness without applying the DSST and which can be used with a single hydrological model calibration. Our work makes it possible to evaluate the temporal transferability of any hydrological model, including uncalibrated models, at a very low computational cost.
Pierre Nicolle, Vazken Andréassian, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Charles Perrin, Guillaume Thirel, Laurent Coron, and Léonard Santos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5013–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this note, a new method (RAT) is proposed to assess the robustness of hydrological models. The RAT method is particularly interesting because it does not require multiple calibrations (it is therefore applicable to uncalibrated models), and it can be used to determine whether a hydrological model may be safely used for climate change impact studies. Success at the robustness assessment test is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition of model robustness.
Antoine Degenne, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, and Vazken Andréassian
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1197, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1197, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We tested whether a simple model combining basic water balance principles with artificial intelligence can predict yearly river flow across many regions and years. Using data from over 3,000 river basins in eight countries, we found that the model works well when predicting future years in the same basin, but is less accurate in new regions because estimating long-term average flow remains difficult. This highlights both the promise and limits of this approach for large-scale water management.
Guilherme M. Guimarães, Maria-Helena Ramos, and Ilias Pechlivanidis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6333, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6333, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This article examines hydrological spells, ranging from successive floods to sub-seasonal alternations between high and low flows. To study these rare successions, we developed an original detection method using baseflow as a catchment recovery indicator. Applying this to 643 catchments in France, we characterize these spells, identifying distinct spatial variability. We found that rapid transitions from low to high flows are concentrated in the Rhone-Mediterranean and Rhine-Meuse basins.
Vazken Andréassian, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Alban de Lavenne, and Julien Lerat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5477–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using 4122 catchments from four continents, we investigate how annual streamflow depends on climate variables (rainfall and potential evaporation) and on the season when precipitation occurs, using an index representing the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation. In all countries and under the main climates represented, synchronicity is, after precipitation, the second most important factor in explaining annual streamflow variations.
Taha-Abderrahman El Ouahabi, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, and Vazken Andréassian
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3586, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3586, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To improve hydrological uncertainty estimation, recent studies have explored machine learning (ML)-based post-processing approaches. Among these, quantile random forests (QRF) are increasingly used for their balance between interpretability and performance. We develop a hydrologically informed QRF trained in a multi-site setting. Our results show that the regional QRF approach is beneficial, particularly in catchments where local information is insufficient.
Julien Lerat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2003–2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2003-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2003-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a method to solve a certain type of equation controlling the storage of water in hydrological models. This equation is often solved with complex numerical methods that may lead to slow runtimes. The method, called the Quadratic Solution of the Approximate Reservoir Equation (QuaSoARe), is both fast and applicable to any equation of this kind regardless of its complexity. The method reduces runtime by a factor of 10 to 50 depending on the model.
Olivier Delaigue, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Pierre Brigode, Benoît Génot, Charles Perrin, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Bruno Janet, Nans Addor, and Vazken Andréassian
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1461–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This dataset covers 654 rivers all flowing in France. The provided time series and catchment attributes will be of interest to those modelers wishing to analyze hydrological behavior and perform model assessments.
Léonard Santos, Vazken Andréassian, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Göran Lindström, Alban de Lavenne, Charles Perrin, Lila Collet, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 683–700, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work investigates how hydrological models are transferred to a period in which climate conditions are different to the ones of the period in which they were set up. The robustness assessment test built to detect dependencies between model error and climatic drivers was applied to three hydrological models in 352 catchments in Denmark, France and Sweden. Potential issues are seen in a significant number of catchments for the models, even though the catchments differ for each model.
Thibault Hallouin, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Maria-Helena Ramos, and Vazken Andréassian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4561–4578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evaluation of the quality of hydrological model outputs against streamflow observations is widespread in the hydrological literature. In order to improve on the reproducibility of published studies, a new evaluation tool dedicated to hydrological applications is presented. It is open source and usable in a variety of programming languages to make it as accessible as possible to the community. Thus, authors and readers alike can use the same tool to produce and reproduce the results.
Ralph Bathelemy, Pierre Brigode, Vazken Andréassian, Charles Perrin, Vincent Moron, Cédric Gaucherel, Emmanuel Tric, and Dominique Boisson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2073–2098, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2073-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2073-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of this work is to provide the first hydroclimatic database for Haiti, a Caribbean country particularly vulnerable to meteorological and hydrological hazards. The resulting database, named Simbi, provides hydroclimatic time series for around 150 stations and 24 catchment areas.
Tom Loree, Hervé Squividant, Josette Launay, Alban de Lavenne, and Christophe Cudennec
Proc. IAHS, 385, 85–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-85-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-85-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A scientific model to simulate river discharges in un-measured locations is made available via a service on the web for end-users. It is shown how this allows an increasing uptake by non-modelers, for the benefit of hydrological assessments and management.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling framework tested.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Laurent Strohmenger, Eric Sauquet, Claire Bernard, Jérémie Bonneau, Flora Branger, Amélie Bresson, Pierre Brigode, Rémy Buzier, Olivier Delaigue, Alexandre Devers, Guillaume Evin, Maïté Fournier, Shu-Chen Hsu, Sandra Lanini, Alban de Lavenne, Thibault Lemaitre-Basset, Claire Magand, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Max Mentha, Simon Munier, Charles Perrin, Tristan Podechard, Léo Rouchy, Malak Sadki, Myriam Soutif-Bellenger, François Tilmant, Yves Tramblay, Anne-Lise Véron, Jean-Philippe Vidal, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3375–3391, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of a large visual inspection campaign of 674 streamflow time series in France. The objective was to detect non-natural records resulting from instrument failure or anthropogenic influences, such as hydroelectric power generation or reservoir management. We conclude that the identification of flaws in flow time series is highly dependent on the objectives and skills of individual evaluators, and we raise the need for better practices for data cleaning.
Alban de Lavenne, Vazken Andréassian, Louise Crochemore, Göran Lindström, and Berit Arheimer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2715–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A watershed remembers the past to some extent, and this memory influences its behavior. This memory is defined by the ability to store past rainfall for several years. By releasing this water into the river or the atmosphere, it tends to forget. We describe how this memory fades over time in France and Sweden. A few watersheds show a multi-year memory. It increases with the influence of groundwater or dry conditions. After 3 or 4 years, they behave independently of the past.
Antoine Pelletier and Vazken Andréassian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2733–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2733-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A large part of the water cycle takes place underground. In many places, the soil stores water during the wet periods and can release it all year long, which is particularly visible when the river level is low. Modelling tools that are used to simulate and forecast the behaviour of the river struggle to represent this. We improved an existing model to take underground water into account using measurements of the soil water content. Results allow us make recommendations for model users.
Paul Royer-Gaspard, Vazken Andréassian, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5703–5716, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5703-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5703-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Most evaluation studies based on the differential split-sample test (DSST) endorse the consensus that rainfall–runoff models lack climatic robustness. In this technical note, we propose a new performance metric to evaluate model robustness without applying the DSST and which can be used with a single hydrological model calibration. Our work makes it possible to evaluate the temporal transferability of any hydrological model, including uncalibrated models, at a very low computational cost.
Pierre Nicolle, Vazken Andréassian, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Charles Perrin, Guillaume Thirel, Laurent Coron, and Léonard Santos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5013–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this note, a new method (RAT) is proposed to assess the robustness of hydrological models. The RAT method is particularly interesting because it does not require multiple calibrations (it is therefore applicable to uncalibrated models), and it can be used to determine whether a hydrological model may be safely used for climate change impact studies. Success at the robustness assessment test is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition of model robustness.
Cited articles
Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017.
Addor, N., Nearing, G., Prieto, C., Newman, A. J., Le Vine, N., and Clark, M. P.: A Ranking of Hydrological Signatures Based on Their Predictability in Space, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8792–8812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022606, 2018.
Almagro, A., Oliveira, P. T. S., Meira Neto, A. A., Roy, T., and Troch, P.: CABra: a novel large-sample dataset for Brazilian catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3105–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3105-2021, 2021.
Anderson, B. J., Brunner, M. I., Slater, L. J., and Dadson, S. J.: Elasticity curves describe streamflow sensitivity to precipitation across the entire flow distribution, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1567–1583, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024, 2024.
Andréassian, V.: On the (im)possible validation of hydrogeological models, C. R. Géosci., 355, 337–345, https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.142, 2023.
Andréassian, V. and Sari, T.: Technical Note: On the puzzling similarity of two water balance formulas – Turc–Mezentsev vs. Tixeront–Fu, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2339–2350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2339-2019, 2019.
Andréassian, V., Coron, L., Lerat, J., and Le Moine, N.: Climate elasticity of streamflow revisited – an elasticity index based on long-term hydrometeorological records, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4503–4524, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4503-2016, 2016.
Andréassian, V., Guimarães, G. M., de Lavenne, A., and Lerat, J.: Time shift between precipitation and evaporation has more impact on annual streamflow variability than the elasticity of potential evaporation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5477–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025, 2025.
Arora, V. K.: The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff, J. Hydrol., 265, 164–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00101-4, 2002.
Bagrov, N.: On long-term average of evapotranspiration from land surface, Meteorologia i Gidrologia, 10, 20–25, 1953 (in Russian).
Berghuijs, W. and Woods, R.: Correspondence: Space-time asymmetry undermines water yield assessment, Nat. Commun., 7, 11603, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11603, 2016.
Berghuijs, W. R., Larsen, J. R., van Emmerik, T. H. M., and Woods, R. A.: A global assessment of runoff sensitivity to changes in precipitation, potential evaporation, and other factors, Water Resour. Res., 53, 8475–8486, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021593, 2017.
Berghuijs, W. R., Gnann, S. J., and Woods, R. A.: Unanswered questions on the Budyko framework, Hydrol. Process., 34, 5699–5703 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13958, 2020.
Budyko, M. I.: Evaporation under natural conditions, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 130 pp., [1948] 1963.
Chiew, F. H. S.: Estimation of rainfall elasticity of streamflow in Australia, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 51, 613–625, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.4.613, 2006.
Coutagne, A. and de Martonne, E.: De l'eau qui tombe à l'eau qui coule – évaporation et déficit d'écoulement, IAHS Red Book series, 20, 97–128, 1934.
Coxon, G., Addor, N., Bloomfield, J. P., Freer, J., Fry, M., Hannaford, J., Howden, N. J. K., Lane, R., Lewis, M., Robinson, E. L., Wagener, T., and Woods, R.: CAMELS-GB: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 671 catchments in Great Britain, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2459–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020, 2020.
de Lavenne, A. and Andréassian, V.: Impact of climate seasonality on catchment yield: a parameterization for commonly-used water balance formulas, J. Hydrol., 558, 266–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.009, 2018.
de Lavenne, A., Andréassian, V., Crochemore, L., Lindström, G., and Arheimer, B.: Quantifying multi-year hydrological memory with Catchment Forgetting Curves, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2715–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2715-2022, 2022.
Delaigue, O., Guimarães, G. M., Brigode, P., Génot, B., Perrin, C., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Janet, B., Addor, N., and Andréassian, V.: CAMELS-FR dataset: a large-sample hydroclimatic dataset for France to explore hydrological diversity and support model benchmarking, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1461–1479, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025, 2025.
Dooge, J. C. I.: Sensitivity of runoff to climate change: A Hortonian approach, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73, 2013–2024, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<2013:SORTCC>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Dooge, J. C., Bruen, M., and Parmentier, B.: A simple model for estimating the sensitivity of runoff to long-term changes in precipitation without a change in vegetation, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00019-6, 1999.
Feng, X., Thompson, S. E., Woods, R., and Porporato, I.: Quantifying asynchronicity of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration in Mediterranean climates, Geophys. Res. Lett., https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085653, 2019.
Fowler, K. J. A., Zhang, Z., and Hou, X.: CAMELS-AUS v2: updated hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for an enlarged set of catchments in Australia, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4079–4095, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4079-2025, 2025.
Fu, B.: On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface, Atmospherica Sinica, 5, 23–31, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1981.01.03, 1981 (in Chinese).
Gnann, S., Anderson, B. J., and Weiler, M.: Uncertainty, temporal variability, and influencing factors of empirical streamflow sensitivities, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 779–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-779-2026, 2026.
Höge, M., Kauzlaric, M., Siber, R., Schönenberger, U., Horton, P., Schwanbeck, J., Floriancic, M. G., Viviroli, D., Wilhelm, S., Sikorska-Senoner, A. E., Addor, N., Brunner, M., Pool, S., Zappa, M., and Fenicia, F.: CAMELS-CH: hydro-meteorological time series and landscape attributes for 331 catchments in hydrologic Switzerland, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5755–5784, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023, 2023.
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J.: A simple framework for examining the interannual variability of land surface moisture fluxes, J. Climate, 12, 1911–1917, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1911:ASFFET>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Loritz, R., Dolich, A., Acuña Espinoza, E., Ebeling, P., Guse, B., Götte, J., Hassler, S. K., Hauffe, C., Heidbüchel, I., Kiesel, J., Mälicke, M., Müller-Thomy, H., Stölzle, M., and Tarasova, L.: CAMELS-DE: hydro-meteorological time series and attributes for 1582 catchments in Germany, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5625–5642, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024, 2024.
Liu, J., Koch, J., Stisen, S., Troldborg, L., Højberg, A. L., Thodsen, H., Hansen, M. F. T., and Schneider, R. J. M.: CAMELS-DK: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 3330 Danish catchments with streamflow observations from 304 gauged stations, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1551–1572, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1551-2025, 2025.
Mathevet, T., Michel, C., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C.: A bounded version of the Nash–Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins, IAHS Red Books Series, 307, 211–219, 2006.
Mezentsev, V.: Back to the computation of total evaporation, Meteorologia i Gidrologia, 5, 24–26, 1955 (in Russian).
Milly, P. C. D.: Climate, interseasonal storage of soil water, and the annual water balance, Adv. Water Resour., 17, 19–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(94)90020-5, 1994.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I – a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Oldekop, E.: Evaporation from the surface of river basins, Collection of the Works of Students of the Meteorological Observatory, University of Tartu (Jurjew, Dorpat), Tartu, Estonia, https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0022169416300270-mmc1.pdf (last access: 27 March 2026), 1911 (in Russian).
Oudin, L. and Lalonde, M.: Pitfalls of space-time trading when parametrizing a land use dependent hydrological model, C. R. Géosci., 355, 99–115, https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.146, 2023.
Oudin, L., Hervieu, F., Michel, C., Perrin, C., Andréassian, V., Anctil, F., and Loumagne, C.: Which potential evapotranspiration input for a rainfall-runoff model? Part 2’– Towards a simple and efficient PE model for rainfall-runoff modelling, J. Hydrol., 303, 290–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.026, 2005.
Pardé, M.: L'abondance des cours d'eau, Rev. Geogr. Alp., 21, 497–542, https://www.persee.fr/doc/rga_0035-1121_1933_num_21_3_5370 (last access: 27 March 2026), 1933.
Peel, M. C. and Blöschl, G.: Hydrological modelling in a changing world, Prog. Phys. Geog.: Earth Environ., 35, 249–261, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402550, 2011.
Pelletier, A. and Andréassian, V.: Caractérisation de la mémoire des bassins versants par approche croisée entre piézométrie et séparation d'hydrogramme, Houille Blanche, 3, 30–37, https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2020032, 2020.
Renner, M., Seppelt, R., and Bernhofer, C.: Evaluation of water-energy balance frameworks to predict the sensitivity of streamflow to climate change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1419–1433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1419-2012, 2012.
Roderick, M. L. and Farquhar, G. D.: A simple framework for relating variations in runoff to variations in climatic conditions and catchment properties, Water Resour. Res., 47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009826, 2011.
Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, R. M., and Limbrunner, J. F.: Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States, Water Resour. Res., 37, 1771–1781, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900330, 2001.
Schaake, J. and Liu, C.: Development and application of simple water balance models to understand the relationship between climate and water resources, New Directions for Surface Water Modeling, IAHS Red Book series, 181, 343–352, https://iahs.info/uploads/dms/7849.343-352-181-Schaake-Jr.pdf (last access: 27 March 2026), 1989.
Schreiber, P.: On the relationship between precipitation and river flow in central Europe (Über die Beziehungen zwischen dem Niederschlag und derWasserführung der Flüsse in Mitteleuropa), Zeitschrift für Meteorologie, 21, 441–452, 1904.
Singh, R., Wagener, T., van Werkhoven, K., Mann, M. E., and Crane, R.: A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate – accounting for changing watershed behavior, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3591–3603, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3591-2011, 2011.
Thornthwaite, C. W.: An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev., 38, 55–94, https://doi.org/10.2307/210739, 1948.
Tixeront, J.: Prediction of streamflow (Prévision des apports des cours d'eau), IAHS publication, 63, 118–126, 1964.
Turc, L.: The water balance of soils: relationship between precipitations, evaporation and flow (Le bilan d'eau des sols: relation entre les précipitations, l'évaporation et l'écoulement), Ann. Agron., 5, 491–595, 1954.
Yang, H., Yang, D., Lei, Z., and Sun, F.: New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03410, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135, 2008.
Yokoo, Y., Sivapalan, M., and Oki, T.: Investigating the role of climate seasonality and landscape characteristics on mean annual and monthly water balances, J. Hydrol., 357, 255–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.010, 2008.
Zhang, L. and Brutsaert, W: Blending the evaporation precipitation ratio with the complementary principle function for the prediction of evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029729, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029729, 2021.
Zhang, Y., Viglione, A., and Blöschl, G.: Temporal scaling of streamflow elasticity to precipitation: A global analysis, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030601, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030601, 2022.
Short summary
We study the variations in annual streamflow and explicit their dependence to climate variations, in order to understand their causes and to provide tools for a rapid assessment of the impact of climate change on water resources. By making explicit the dependency of streamflow elasticity to aridity, we are able to propose a regionalized elasticity formula with physically-realistic elasticity coefficients.
We study the variations in annual streamflow and explicit their dependence to climate...
