Articles | Volume 28, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024
Research article
 | 
02 Jan 2024
Research article |  | 02 Jan 2024

A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+

Salam A. Abbas, Ryan T. Bailey, Jeremy T. White, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao

Related authors

SWAT+MODFLOW: A New Hydrologic Model for Simulating Surface-Subsurface Flow in Managed Watersheds
Ryan Bailey, Salam Abbas, Jeffrey Arnold, and Michael White
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-300,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-300, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Long short-term memory networks for enhancing real-time flood forecasts: a case study for an underperforming hydrologic model
Sebastian Gegenleithner, Manuel Pirker, Clemens Dorfmann, Roman Kern, and Josef Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1939–1962, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1939-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1939-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing the value of high-resolution rainfall and streamflow data for hydrological modeling: an analysis based on 63 catchments in southeast China
Mahmut Tudaji, Yi Nan, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1919–1937, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1919-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1919-2025, 2025
Short summary
Catchments do not strictly follow Budyko curves over multiple decades, but deviations are minor and predictable
Muhammad Ibrahim, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Ruud van der Ent, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1703–1723, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1703-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Scale dependency in modeling nivo-glacial hydrological systems: the case of the Arolla basin, Switzerland
Anne-Laure Argentin, Pascal Horton, Bettina Schaefli, Jamal Shokory, Felix Pitscheider, Leona Repnik, Mattia Gianini, Simone Bizzi, Stuart N. Lane, and Francesco Comiti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1725–1748, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1725-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1725-2025, 2025
Short summary
Extended-range forecasting of stream water temperature with deep-learning models
Ryan S. Padrón, Massimiliano Zappa, Luzi Bernhard, and Konrad Bogner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1685–1702, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1685-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1685-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbas, S., Xuan, Y., and Bailey, R.: Assessing Climate Change Impact on Water Resources in Water Demand Scenarios Using SWAT-MODFLOW-WEAP, Hydrology, 9, 164, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9100164, 2022. 
Arnold, J., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R., and Williams, J.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34, 73–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1998. 
Arnold, J., Kiniry, J., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J., Haney, E., and Neitsch, S.: Soil & Water Assessment Tool: Input/output documentation, version 2012, 2013 TR-439, Texas Water Resources Institute, https://swat.tamu.edu/media/69296/swat-io-documentation-2012.pdf (last access: 16 June 2023), 2013. 
Arnold, J., White, M., Allen, P., Gassman, P., and Bieger, K.: Conceptual Framework of connectivity for a national agroecosystem model based on transport processes and management practices. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 57, 154–169, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12890, 2020. 
Bahremand, A. and De Smedt, F.: Predictive Analysis and Simulation Uncertainty of a Distributed Hydrological Model, Water Resour. Manage., 24, 2869–2880, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9584-1, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
Research highlights.

1. Implemented groundwater module (gwflow) into SWAT+ for four watersheds with different unique hydrologic features across the United States.

2. Presented methods for sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation for coupled models.

3. Sensitivity analysis for streamflow and groundwater head conducted using Morris method.

4. Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation performed using an iterative ensemble smoother within the PEST framework.

Share