Articles | Volume 27, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3351-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3351-2023
Research article
 | 
21 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 21 Sep 2023

Uncertainty in three dimensions: the challenges of communicating probabilistic flood forecast maps

Valérie Jean, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Anissa Frini, and Dominic Roussel

Related authors

Cold Climates, Complex Hydrology: Can A Land Surface Model Accurately Simulate Deep Percolation?
Alireza Amani, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Alexandre R. Cabral, Vincent Vionnet, and Étienne Gaborit
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1277,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1277, 2024
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting: blending climate predictions with AI models
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Large-scale snow data assimilation using a spatialized particle filter: recovering the spatial structure of the particles
Jean Odry, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Simon Lachance-Cloutier, Richard Turcotte, and Pierre-Yves St-Louis
The Cryosphere, 16, 3489–3506, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Exploring hydrologic post-processing of ensemble streamflow forecasts based on affine kernel dressing and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II
Jing Xu, François Anctil, and Marie-Amélie Boucher
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1001–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1001-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1001-2022, 2022
Short summary
Investigating ANN architectures and training to estimate snow water equivalent from snow depth
Konstantin F. F. Ntokas, Jean Odry, Marie-Amélie Boucher, and Camille Garnaud
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3017–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3017-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3017-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Guiding community discussions on human–water challenges by serious gaming in the upper Ewaso Ngiro River basin, Kenya
Charles Nduhiu Wamucii, Pieter R. van Oel, Adriaan J. Teuling, Arend Ligtenberg, John Mwangi Gathenya, Gert Jan Hofstede, Meine van Noordwijk, and Erika N. Speelman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3495–3518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Levee system transformation in coevolution between humans and water systems along the Kiso River, Japan
Shinichiro Nakamura, Fuko Nakai, Yuichiro Ito, Ginga Okada, and Taikan Oki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2329–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2329-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2329-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reframing water demand management: a new co-governance framework coupling supply-side and demand-side solutions toward sustainability
Yueyi Liu, Hang Zheng, and Jianshi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2223–2238, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2223-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: The unsustainable use of groundwater conceals a “Day Zero”
Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Juan Pablo Boisier, René Garreaud, Javier González, Roberto Rondanelli, Eugenia Gayó, and Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1605–1616, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1605-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1605-2024, 2024
Short summary
Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area
Benjamin L. Ruddell and Richard Rushforth
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1089–1106, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson-Berry, L., Achilles, T., Panduck, S., Mackie, B., Canterford, S., Leck, A., and Brid, D.: Sending a message : how signifiant events have influenced the warnings landscape in Australia, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 30, 50–17, 2018. a
Belin, P., Verrhiest-Leblanc, G., and Valantin, P.-Y.: Exploitation des outils d’anticipation des phénomènes pour l’aide à l’anticipation, La Houille Blanche, 3-4, 31–38, 2019. a
Beven, K.: Rainfall-runoff modelling: a primer, 2nd edn., Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 978-0-470-71459-1, 2012.  a
Carr, R., Montz, B., Maxfield, K., Hoekskstra, S., Semmens, K., and Goldman, E.: Effectively communicating risk and uncertainty to the public, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1649–1665, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Carr, R., Montz, B., Semmens, K., Maxfield, K., Connolly, S., Ahnert, P., Shedd, R., and Elliott, J.: Major risks, uncertain outcomes : making ensemble forecasts work for multiple audiences, Weather Forecast., 33, 1359–1373, 2018. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
Flood forecasts are only useful if they are understood correctly. They are also uncertain, and it is difficult to present all of the information about the forecast and its uncertainty on a map, as it is three dimensional (water depth and extent, in all directions). To overcome this, we interviewed 139 people to understand their preferences in terms of forecast visualization. We propose simple and effective ways of presenting flood forecast maps so that they can be understood and useful.