Articles | Volume 26, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1357-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1357-2022
Research article
 | 
11 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 11 Mar 2022

A review of the applicability of the motivations and abilities (MOTA) framework for assessing the implementation success of water resources management plans and policies

John Conallin, Nathan Ning, Jennifer Bond, Nicholas Pawsey, Lee J. Baumgartner, Dwi Atminarso, Hannah McPherson, Wayne Robinson, and Garry Thorncraft

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Guiding community discussions on human–water challenges by serious gaming in the upper Ewaso Ngiro River basin, Kenya
Charles Nduhiu Wamucii, Pieter R. van Oel, Adriaan J. Teuling, Arend Ligtenberg, John Mwangi Gathenya, Gert Jan Hofstede, Meine van Noordwijk, and Erika N. Speelman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3495–3518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Levee system transformation in coevolution between humans and water systems along the Kiso River, Japan
Shinichiro Nakamura, Fuko Nakai, Yuichiro Ito, Ginga Okada, and Taikan Oki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2329–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2329-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2329-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reframing water demand management: a new co-governance framework coupling supply-side and demand-side solutions toward sustainability
Yueyi Liu, Hang Zheng, and Jianshi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2223–2238, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2223-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: The unsustainable use of groundwater conceals a “Day Zero”
Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Juan Pablo Boisier, René Garreaud, Javier González, Roberto Rondanelli, Eugenia Gayó, and Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1605–1616, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1605-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1605-2024, 2024
Short summary
Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area
Benjamin L. Ruddell and Richard Rushforth
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1089–1106, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ajzen, I.: From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior, in: Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, edited by: Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 11–39, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2, 1985. 
Ajzen, I.: The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organiz. Behav. Human Decis. Process., 50, 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T, 1991. 
Ananda, J.: Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning, Environ. Manage., 39, 534–544, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0031-2, 2007. 
Arora, G.: Bridging the gap between planning and implementation in strategic delta planning: Structuring implementation programming, MS thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 134 pp., https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T, 2018. 
Bagheri, A., Bondori, A., Allahyari, M. S., and Damalas, C. A.: Modeling farmers' intention to use pesticides: An expanded version of the theory of planned behavior, J. Environ., 248, 109291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109291, 2019. 
Download
Short summary
Implementation failure is well known to be a major barrier to the success of water resource plans and policies. The motivations and abilities (MOTA) approach attempts to address this barrier, by providing a multi-stakeholder, multilevel tool to assess triggers, motivations and abilities supporting the implementation feasibility of plans. We review existing MOTA applications in various water management contexts and propose several complementary add-in applications to complement the approach.