Articles | Volume 24, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3157-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3157-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
19 Jun 2020
Research article |
| 19 Jun 2020
| 19 Jun 2020
The accuracy of weather radar in heavy rain: a comparative study for Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden
Marc Schleiss
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dept. of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Jonas Olsson
Hydrology Research Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute SMHI, Norrkoping, Sweden
Peter Berg
Hydrology Research Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute SMHI, Norrkoping, Sweden
Tero Niemi
Dept. of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
Finnish Meteorological Institute FMI, Helsinki, Finland
Teemu Kokkonen
Dept. of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
Søren Thorndahl
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Rasmus Nielsen
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Jesper Ellerbæk Nielsen
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Denica Bozhinova
Hydrology Research Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute SMHI, Norrkoping, Sweden
Seppo Pulkkinen
Finnish Meteorological Institute FMI, Helsinki, Finland
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
Related authors
Marc Schleiss
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4789–4802, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research is conducted to identify special rainfall patterns in the Netherlands using multiple types of rainfall sensors. A total of eight potentially unique events are analyzed, considering both the number and size of raindrops. However, no clear evidence supporting the existence of a special rainfall regime could be found. The results highlight the challenges in experimentally confirming well-established theoretical ideas in the field of precipitation sciences.
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 235–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A common method to retrieve important information about the microphysical structure of rain (DSD retrievals) requires a constrained relationship between the drop size distribution parameters. The most widely accepted empirical relationship is between μ and Λ. The relationship shows variability across the different types of rainfall (convective or stratiform). The new proposed power-law model to represent the μ–Λ relation provides a better physical interpretation of the relationship coefficients.
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4951–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.
Anna Špačková, Vojtěch Bareš, Martin Fencl, Marc Schleiss, Joël Jaffrain, Alexis Berne, and Jörg Rieckermann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4219–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4219-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4219-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An original dataset of microwave signal attenuation and rainfall variables was collected during 1-year-long field campaign. The monitored 38 GHz dual-polarized commercial microwave link with a short sampling resolution (4 s) was accompanied by five disdrometers and three rain gauges along its path. Antenna radomes were temporarily shielded for approximately half of the campaign period to investigate antenna wetting impacts.
Didier de Villiers, Marc Schleiss, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Rolf Hut, and Nick van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5607–5623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based rainfall observations across the African continent are sparse. We present a new and inexpensive rainfall measuring instrument (the intervalometer) and use it to derive reasonably accurate rainfall rates. These are dependent on a fundamental assumption that is widely used in parameterisations of the rain drop size distribution. This assumption is tested and found to not apply for most raindrops but is still useful in deriving rainfall rates. The intervalometer shows good potential.
Marc Schleiss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3699–3723, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3699-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3699-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new way to downscale rainfall fields based on the notion of equal-volume areas (EVAs) is proposed. Experiments conducted on 100 rainfall events in the Netherlands show that the EVA method outperforms classical methods based on fixed grid cell sizes, producing fields with more realistic spatial structures. The main novelty of the method lies in its adaptive sampling strategy, which avoids many of the mathematical challenges associated with the presence of zero rainfall values.
Marc Schleiss
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 955–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-955-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-955-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The present study aims at explaining how intermittency (i.e., the alternation of dry and rainy periods) affects the rate at which precipitation extremes increase with temperature. Using high-resolution rainfall data from 99 stations in the United States, we show that at scales beyond a few hours, intermittency causes rainfall extremes to deviate substantially from Clausius–Clapeyron. A new model is proposed to better represent and predict these changes across scales.
Christian Bouwens, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Marc Schleiss, Xin Tian, and Jerôme Schepers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-751, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-751, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Urban drainage systems are challenged by both urbanization and climate change, intensifying flooding impacts by rainfall. We performed this study to better understand and predict this process. The paper provides an approach to analyze the functioning of an urban drainage system without the need to run hydrodynamic models. Rainfall thresholds for urban flood prediction were derived, which surprisingly are only approximately half of the theoretical drainage system design capacity.
Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis and Marc Schleiss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1991–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1991-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1991-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we analysed flow measurements from 17 watersheds in a (semi-)urban region, to characterise flow patterns according to basin features. Instead of sampling flows at fixed time intervals, we looked at how fast given amounts of flow were accumulated. By doing so, we could identify patterns of flow regulation in urban streams and quantify flashiness of hydrological response. We were able to show that in this region, higher urbanisation was clearly associated with lower basin flashiness.
M. Stähli, M. Sättele, C. Huggel, B. W. McArdell, P. Lehmann, A. Van Herwijnen, A. Berne, M. Schleiss, A. Ferrari, A. Kos, D. Or, and S. M. Springman
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 905–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-905-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-905-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
This review paper describes the state of the art in monitoring and predicting rapid mass movements for early warning. It further presents recent innovations in observation technologies and modelling to be used in future early warning systems (EWS). Finally, the paper proposes avenues towards successful implementation of next-generation EWS.
Peter Berg, Thomas Bosshard, Denica Bozhinova, Lars Bärring, Joakim Löw, Carolina Nilsson, Gustav Strandberg, Johan Södling, Johan Thuresson, Renate Wilcke, and Wei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8173–8179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
When bias adjusting climate model data using quantile mapping, one needs to prescribe what to do at the tails of the distribution, where a larger data range is likely encountered outside of the calibration period. The end result is highly dependent on the method used. We show that, to avoid discontinuities in the time series, one needs to exclude data in the calibration range to also activate the extrapolation functionality in that time period.
Miguel Aldana, Seppo Pulkkinen, Annakaisa von Lerber, Matthew R. Kumjian, and Dmitri Moisseev
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-155, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-155, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate KDP estimates are crucial in radar-based applications. We quantify the uncertainties of several publicly available KDP estimation methods for multiple rainfall intensities. We use C-band weather radar observations and employed a self-consistency KDP, estimated from reflectivity and differential reflectivity, as framework for the examination. Our study provides guidance in the performance, uncertainties and optimisation of the methods, focusing mainly on accuracy and robustness.
Jenna Ritvanen, Seppo Pulkkinen, Dmitri Moisseev, and Daniele Nerini
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-99, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-99, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Nowcasting models struggle with the rapid evolution of heavy rain, and common verification methods are unable to describe how accurately the models predict the growth and decay of heavy rainfall. We propose a framework to assess model performance. In the framework, convective cells are identified and tracked in the forecasts and observations, and then the model skill is evaluated by comparing differences between forecast and observed cells. We demonstrate the framework with 4 open-source models.
Marc Schleiss
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4789–4802, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research is conducted to identify special rainfall patterns in the Netherlands using multiple types of rainfall sensors. A total of eight potentially unique events are analyzed, considering both the number and size of raindrops. However, no clear evidence supporting the existence of a special rainfall regime could be found. The results highlight the challenges in experimentally confirming well-established theoretical ideas in the field of precipitation sciences.
Bent Harnist, Seppo Pulkkinen, and Terhi Mäkinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3839–3866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3839-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3839-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Probabilistic precipitation nowcasting (local forecasting for 0–6 h) is crucial for reducing damage from events like flash floods. For this goal, we propose the DEUCE neural-network-based model which uses data and model uncertainties to generate an ensemble of potential precipitation development scenarios for the next hour. Trained and evaluated with Finnish precipitation composites, DEUCE was found to produce more skillful and reliable nowcasts than established models.
Hideo Amaguchi, Jonas Olsson, Akira Kawamura, and Yoshiyuki Imamura
Proc. IAHS, 386, 133–140, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-133-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this research, event-based simulations were conducted using inputs from a regional climate model, providing a resolution of 5 km and updating every 10 min for both present and future climate scenarios. The findings suggest that future storms may lead to increased flooding in the watershed. This study highlights the importance of using high-resolution data to understand and prepare for the potential impacts of climate change on urban rivers.
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 235–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A common method to retrieve important information about the microphysical structure of rain (DSD retrievals) requires a constrained relationship between the drop size distribution parameters. The most widely accepted empirical relationship is between μ and Λ. The relationship shows variability across the different types of rainfall (convective or stratiform). The new proposed power-law model to represent the μ–Λ relation provides a better physical interpretation of the relationship coefficients.
Jafet C. M. Andersson, Jonas Olsson, Remco (C. Z.) van de Beek, and Jonas Hansryd
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5411–5426, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5411-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5411-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This article presents data from three types of sensors for rain measurement, i.e. commercial microwave links (CMLs), gauges, and weather radar. Access to CML data is typically restricted, which limits research and applications. We openly share a large CML database (364 CMLs at 10 s resolution with true coordinates), along with 11 gauges and one radar composite. This opens up new opportunities to study CMLs, to benchmark algorithms, and to investigate how multiple sensors can best be combined.
Eva Sebok, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, Ernesto Pastén-Zapata, Peter Berg, Guillaume Thirel, Anthony Lemoine, Andrea Lira-Loarca, Christiana Photiadou, Rafael Pimentel, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Erik Kjellström, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Jean Philippe Vidal, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Markus G. Donat, Giovanni Besio, María José Polo, Simon Stisen, Yvan Caballero, Ilias G. Pechlivanidis, Lars Troldborg, and Jens Christian Refsgaard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5605–5625, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models projecting the impact of changing climate carry a lot of uncertainty. Thus, these models usually have a multitude of simulations using different future climate data. This study used the subjective opinion of experts to assess which climate and hydrological models are the most likely to correctly predict climate impacts, thereby easing the computational burden. The experts could select more likely hydrological models, while the climate models were deemed equally probable.
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4951–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.
Peter Berg, Thomas Bosshard, Wei Yang, and Klaus Zimmermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6165–6180, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6165-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6165-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When performing impact analyses with climate models, one is often confronted with the issue that the models have significant bias. Commonly, the modelled climatological temperature deviates from the observed climate by a few degrees or it rains excessively in the model. MIdAS employs a novel statistical model to translate the model climatology toward that observed using novel methodologies and modern tools. The coding platform allows opportunities to develop methods for high-resolution models.
Erika Médus, Emma D. Thomassen, Danijel Belušić, Petter Lind, Peter Berg, Jens H. Christensen, Ole B. Christensen, Andreas Dobler, Erik Kjellström, Jonas Olsson, and Wei Yang
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 693–711, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-693-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-693-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate the skill of a regional climate model, HARMONIE-Climate, to capture the present-day characteristics of heavy precipitation in the Nordic region and investigate the added value provided by a convection-permitting model version. The higher model resolution improves the representation of hourly heavy- and extreme-precipitation events and their diurnal cycle. The results indicate the benefits of convection-permitting models for constructing climate change projections over the region.
Anna Špačková, Vojtěch Bareš, Martin Fencl, Marc Schleiss, Joël Jaffrain, Alexis Berne, and Jörg Rieckermann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4219–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4219-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4219-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An original dataset of microwave signal attenuation and rainfall variables was collected during 1-year-long field campaign. The monitored 38 GHz dual-polarized commercial microwave link with a short sampling resolution (4 s) was accompanied by five disdrometers and three rain gauges along its path. Antenna radomes were temporarily shielded for approximately half of the campaign period to investigate antenna wetting impacts.
Didier de Villiers, Marc Schleiss, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Rolf Hut, and Nick van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5607–5623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based rainfall observations across the African continent are sparse. We present a new and inexpensive rainfall measuring instrument (the intervalometer) and use it to derive reasonably accurate rainfall rates. These are dependent on a fundamental assumption that is widely used in parameterisations of the rain drop size distribution. This assumption is tested and found to not apply for most raindrops but is still useful in deriving rainfall rates. The intervalometer shows good potential.
Katja Weigel, Lisa Bock, Bettina K. Gier, Axel Lauer, Mattia Righi, Manuel Schlund, Kemisola Adeniyi, Bouwe Andela, Enrico Arnone, Peter Berg, Louis-Philippe Caron, Irene Cionni, Susanna Corti, Niels Drost, Alasdair Hunter, Llorenç Lledó, Christian Wilhelm Mohr, Aytaç Paçal, Núria Pérez-Zanón, Valeriu Predoi, Marit Sandstad, Jana Sillmann, Andreas Sterl, Javier Vegas-Regidor, Jost von Hardenberg, and Veronika Eyring
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3159–3184, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents new diagnostics for the Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 on the hydrological cycle, extreme events, impact assessment, regional evaluations, and ensemble member selection. The ESMValTool v2.0 diagnostics are developed by a large community of scientists aiming to facilitate the evaluation and comparison of Earth system models (ESMs) with a focus on the ESMs participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP).
Jonas Olsson, Peter Berg, and Remco van de Beek
Adv. Sci. Res., 18, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-59-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-59-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a tool to visualize rainfall observations, based on a combination of meteorological stations and weather radars, over Sweden in near real-time. By accumulating the rainfall in time (1–12 h) and space (hydrological basins), the tool is designed mainly for hydrological applications, e.g. to support flood forecasters and to facilitate post-event analyses. Despite evident uncertainties, different users have confirmed an added value of the tool in case studies.
Peter Berg, Fredrik Almén, and Denica Bozhinova
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1531–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1531-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1531-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
HydroGFD3.0 (Hydrological Global Forcing Data) is a data set of daily precipitation and temperature intended for use in hydrological modelling. The method uses different observational data sources to correct the variables from a model estimation of precipitation and temperature. An openly available data set covers the years 1979–2019, and times after this are available by request.
Torben Schmith, Peter Thejll, Peter Berg, Fredrik Boberg, Ole Bøssing Christensen, Bo Christiansen, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Marianne Sloth Madsen, and Christian Steger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 273–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-273-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-273-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
European extreme precipitation is expected to change in the future; this is based on climate model projections. But, since climate models have errors, projections are uncertain. We study this uncertainty in the projections by comparing results from an ensemble of 19 climate models. Results can be used to give improved estimates of future extreme precipitation for Europe.
Marc Schleiss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3699–3723, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3699-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3699-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A new way to downscale rainfall fields based on the notion of equal-volume areas (EVAs) is proposed. Experiments conducted on 100 rainfall events in the Netherlands show that the EVA method outperforms classical methods based on fixed grid cell sizes, producing fields with more realistic spatial structures. The main novelty of the method lies in its adaptive sampling strategy, which avoids many of the mathematical challenges associated with the presence of zero rainfall values.
Remco (C. Z.) van de Beek, Jonas Olsson, and Jafet Andersson
Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 79–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-79-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-79-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution precipitation observation based on signal attenuation in a Commercial Microwave Link (CML) network is an emerging technique that is becoming more and more used. Here a pragmatic method for estimating the optimal resolution is presented. The method is demonstrated using a CML network and a representative precpitation pattern in Stockholm, Sweden. One application would be feasibility investigations in cities considering starting CML-based precipitation observations.
Seppo Pulkkinen, Daniele Nerini, Andrés A. Pérez Hortal, Carlos Velasco-Forero, Alan Seed, Urs Germann, and Loris Foresti
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4185–4219, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4185-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4185-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable precipitation forecasts are vital for the society, as water-related hazards can cause economic losses and loss of lives. Pysteps is an open-source Python library for radar-based precipitation forecasting. It aims to be a well-documented platform for development of new methods as well as an easy-to-use tool for practitioners. The potential of the library is demonstrated by case studies and scientific experiments using radar data from Finland, Switzerland, the United States and Australia.
Peter Berg, Ole B. Christensen, Katharina Klehmet, Geert Lenderink, Jonas Olsson, Claas Teichmann, and Wei Yang
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 957–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-957-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-957-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A state-of-the-art regional climate model ensemble for Europe is investigated for extreme precipitation intensities. The models poorly reproduce short duration events of less than a few hours. Further, there is poor connection to some known hotspots for extreme cases. The model performance is much improved at 12 h durations. Projected future increases scale with seasonal mean temperature change, within a range from a few percent to over 10 percent per degree Celsius.
Marc Schleiss
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 955–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-955-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-955-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The present study aims at explaining how intermittency (i.e., the alternation of dry and rainy periods) affects the rate at which precipitation extremes increase with temperature. Using high-resolution rainfall data from 99 stations in the United States, we show that at scales beyond a few hours, intermittency causes rainfall extremes to deviate substantially from Clausius–Clapeyron. A new model is proposed to better represent and predict these changes across scales.
Stephen Blenkinsop, Hayley J. Fowler, Renaud Barbero, Steven C. Chan, Selma B. Guerreiro, Elizabeth Kendon, Geert Lenderink, Elizabeth Lewis, Xiao-Feng Li, Seth Westra, Lisa Alexander, Richard P. Allan, Peter Berg, Robert J. H. Dunn, Marie Ekström, Jason P. Evans, Greg Holland, Richard Jones, Erik Kjellström, Albert Klein-Tank, Dennis Lettenmaier, Vimal Mishra, Andreas F. Prein, Justin Sheffield, and Mari R. Tye
Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 117–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-117-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-117-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of sub-daily (e.g. hourly) rainfall totals are essential if we are to understand short, intense bursts of rainfall that cause flash floods. We might expect the intensity of such events to increase in a warming climate but these are poorly realised in projections of future climate change. The INTENSE project is collating a global dataset of hourly rainfall measurements and linking with new developments in climate models to understand the characteristics and causes of these events.
Kean Foster, Cintia Bertacchi Uvo, and Jonas Olsson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2953–2970, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2953-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2953-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Hydropower makes up nearly half of Sweden's electrical energy production. Careful reservoir management is required for optimal production throughout the year and accurate seasonal forecasts are essential for this. In this work we develop a seasonal forecast prototype and evaluate its ability to predict spring flood volumes, a critical variable, in northern Sweden. We show that the prototype is better than the operational system on average 65 % of the time and reduces the volume error by ~ 6 %.
Peter Berg, Chantal Donnelly, and David Gustafsson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 989–1000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-989-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-989-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A new product (Global Forcing Data, GFD) that provides bias-adjusted meteorological forcing data for impact models, such as hydrological models, is presented. The main novelty with the product is the near-real time updating of the data which allows more up-to-date impact modeling. This is performed by combining climatological data sets with climate monitoring data sets. The potential in using the data to initialize hydrological forecasts is further investigated.
Christian Bouwens, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Marc Schleiss, Xin Tian, and Jerôme Schepers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-751, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-751, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Urban drainage systems are challenged by both urbanization and climate change, intensifying flooding impacts by rainfall. We performed this study to better understand and predict this process. The paper provides an approach to analyze the functioning of an urban drainage system without the need to run hydrodynamic models. Rainfall thresholds for urban flood prediction were derived, which surprisingly are only approximately half of the theoretical drainage system design capacity.
Søren Thorndahl, Aske Korup Andersen, and Anders Badsberg Larsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4433–4448, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4433-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4433-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Time series of rainfall are developed in order to represent future climate conditions. These series can be used in design of, for example, drainage systems where future rainfall loads are important to account for. The climate projections are evaluated on a number of key statistical parameters of rainfall such as yearly and seasonal precipitation amounts, number of extreme events and rainfall intensities, specific duration, and return periods.
Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis and Marc Schleiss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1991–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1991-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1991-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we analysed flow measurements from 17 watersheds in a (semi-)urban region, to characterise flow patterns according to basin features. Instead of sampling flows at fixed time intervals, we looked at how fast given amounts of flow were accumulated. By doing so, we could identify patterns of flow regulation in urban streams and quantify flashiness of hydrological response. We were able to show that in this region, higher urbanisation was clearly associated with lower basin flashiness.
Søren Thorndahl, Thomas Einfalt, Patrick Willems, Jesper Ellerbæk Nielsen, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Michael R. Rasmussen, and Peter Molnar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1359–1380, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1359-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1359-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reviews how weather radar data can be used in urban hydrological applications. It focuses on three areas of research: (1) temporal and spatial resolution of rainfall data, (2) rainfall estimation, radar data adjustment and data quality, and (3) nowcasting of radar rainfall and real-time applications. Moreover, the paper provides examples of urban hydrological applications which can benefit from radar rainfall data in comparison to tradition rain gauge measurements of rainfall.
J. Olsson, C. B. Uvo, K. Foster, and W. Yang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 659–667, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-659-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-659-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
New approaches to spring-flood forecasting that reflect the latest developments with respect to analysis and modelling on seasonal timescales are presented and evaluated. Three main approaches, represented by specific methods, are evaluated in spring-flood hindcasts for three Swedish rivers over a 10-year period. When combining all forecasts in a weighted multi-model approach, a mean improvement over all locations and lead times of nearly 5 % was indicated, as compared with today's approach.
W. Yang, M. Gardelin, J. Olsson, and T. Bosshard
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2037–2057, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2037-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2037-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A distribution-based scaling approach was developed and proven useful as a post-process to correct systematic biases in climate modelling outputs (i.e. precipitation, temperature, relative humidity and wind speed) to facilitate the utilisation of climate projections in forest fire risk studies. The result showed reduction of bias in forcing data and an improved description of fire-risk-related indices. Concerning the future climate, southern Sweden is likely to become a more fire-prone region.
B. Eggert, P. Berg, J. O. Haerter, D. Jacob, and C. Moseley
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5957–5971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5957-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5957-2015, 2015
M. Stähli, M. Sättele, C. Huggel, B. W. McArdell, P. Lehmann, A. Van Herwijnen, A. Berne, M. Schleiss, A. Ferrari, A. Kos, D. Or, and S. M. Springman
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 905–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-905-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-905-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
This review paper describes the state of the art in monitoring and predicting rapid mass movements for early warning. It further presents recent innovations in observation technologies and modelling to be used in future early warning systems (EWS). Finally, the paper proposes avenues towards successful implementation of next-generation EWS.
P. Berg, R. Döscher, and T. Koenigk
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 849–859, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-849-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-849-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
On the visual detection of non-natural records in streamflow time series: challenges and impacts
Historical rainfall data in northern Italy predict larger meteorological drought hazard than climate projections
Daytime-only mean data enhance understanding of land–atmosphere coupling
Quantifying the uncertainty of precipitation forecasting using probabilistic deep learning
Unraveling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate change
Exploring hydrologic post-processing of ensemble streamflow forecasts based on affine kernel dressing and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II
Choosing between post-processing precipitation forecasts or chaining several uncertainty quantification tools in hydrological forecasting systems
Performance of the Global Forecast System's medium-range precipitation forecasts in the Niger river basin using multiple satellite-based products
Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
Bias-correcting input variables enhances forecasting of reference crop evapotranspiration
Uncertainty of gridded precipitation and temperature reference datasets in climate change impact studies
At which timescale does the complementary principle perform best in evaporation estimation?
Uncertainty in nonstationary frequency analysis of South Korea's daily rainfall peak over threshold excesses associated with covariates
Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability
A new uncertainty estimation approach with multiple datasets and implementation for various precipitation products
A crash-testing framework for predictive uncertainty assessment when forecasting high flows in an extrapolation context
Required sampling density of ground-based soil moisture and brightness temperature observations for calibration and validation of L-band satellite observations based on a virtual reality
Response of global evaporation to major climate modes in historical and future Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 simulations
Cross-validating precipitation datasets in the Indus River basin
Selection of multi-model ensemble of general circulation models for the simulation of precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature based on spatial assessment metrics
Assessment of spatial uncertainty of heavy rainfall at catchment scale using a dense gauge network
Influence of three phases of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on daily precipitation regimes in China
Dual-polarized quantitative precipitation estimation as a function of range
Reconstruction of droughts in India using multiple land-surface models (1951–2015)
Relative effects of statistical preprocessing and postprocessing on a regional hydrological ensemble prediction system
Exploratory studies into seasonal flow forecasting potential for large lakes
Evaluation of multiple forcing data sets for precipitation and shortwave radiation over major land areas of China
Verification of ECMWF System 4 for seasonal hydrological forecasting in a northern climate
Providing a non-deterministic representation of spatial variability of precipitation in the Everest region
Inter-comparison of daily precipitation products for large-scale hydro-climatic applications over Canada
Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones
Characteristics of rainfall events in regional climate model simulations for the Czech Republic
The rainfall erosivity factor in the Czech Republic and its uncertainty
Hierarchy of climate and hydrological uncertainties in transient low-flow projections
Willingness-to-pay for a probabilistic flood forecast: a risk-based decision-making game
Assessment of small-scale variability of rainfall and multi-satellite precipitation estimates using measurements from a dense rain gauge network in Southeast India
Comparing CFSR and conventional weather data for discharge and soil loss modelling with SWAT in small catchments in the Ethiopian Highlands
Uncertainties in calculating precipitation climatology in East Asia
Measurement and interpolation uncertainties in rainfall maps from cellular communication networks
Characterization of precipitation product errors across the United States using multiplicative triple collocation
Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework
Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
Multi-objective parameter optimization of common land model using adaptive surrogate modeling
Testing gridded land precipitation data and precipitation and runoff reanalyses (1982–2010) between 45° S and 45° N with normalised difference vegetation index data
Evaluation of high-resolution precipitation analyses using a dense station network
Prediction of extreme floods based on CMIP5 climate models: a case study in the Beijiang River basin, South China
Estimating the water needed to end the drought or reduce the drought severity in the Carpathian region
Alternative configurations of quantile regression for estimating predictive uncertainty in water level forecasts for the upper Severn River: a comparison
Comparison of drought indicators derived from multiple data sets over Africa
The potential of radar-based ensemble forecasts for flash-flood early warning in the southern Swiss Alps
Laurent Strohmenger, Eric Sauquet, Claire Bernard, Jérémie Bonneau, Flora Branger, Amélie Bresson, Pierre Brigode, Rémy Buzier, Olivier Delaigue, Alexandre Devers, Guillaume Evin, Maïté Fournier, Shu-Chen Hsu, Sandra Lanini, Alban de Lavenne, Thibault Lemaitre-Basset, Claire Magand, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Max Mentha, Simon Munier, Charles Perrin, Tristan Podechard, Léo Rouchy, Malak Sadki, Myriam Soutif-Bellenger, François Tilmant, Yves Tramblay, Anne-Lise Véron, Jean-Philippe Vidal, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3375–3391, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of a large visual inspection campaign of 674 streamflow time series in France. The objective was to detect non-natural records resulting from instrument failure or anthropogenic influences, such as hydroelectric power generation or reservoir management. We conclude that the identification of flaws in flow time series is highly dependent on the objectives and skills of individual evaluators, and we raise the need for better practices for data cleaning.
Rui Guo and Alberto Montanari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2847–2863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The present study refers to the region of Bologna, where the availability of a 209-year-long daily rainfall series allows us to make a unique assessment of global climate models' reliability and their predicted changes in rainfall and multiyear droughts. Our results suggest carefully considering the impact of uncertainty when designing climate change adaptation policies for droughts. Rigorous use and comprehensive interpretation of the available information are needed to avoid mismanagement.
Zun Yin, Kirsten L. Findell, Paul Dirmeyer, Elena Shevliakova, Sergey Malyshev, Khaled Ghannam, Nina Raoult, and Zhihong Tan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 861–872, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-861-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-861-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Land–atmosphere (L–A) interactions typically focus on daytime processes connecting the land state with the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. However, much prior L–A work used monthly or daily means due to the lack of daytime-only data products. Here we show that monthly smoothing can significantly obscure the L–A coupling signal, and including nighttime information can mute or mask the daytime processes of interest. We propose diagnosing L–A coupling within models or archiving subdaily data.
Lei Xu, Nengcheng Chen, Chao Yang, Hongchu Yu, and Zeqiang Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2923–2938, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2923-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2923-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation forecasting has potential uncertainty due to data and model uncertainties. Here, an integrated predictive uncertainty modeling framework is proposed by jointly considering data and model uncertainties through an uncertainty propagation theorem. The results indicate an effective predictive uncertainty estimation for precipitation forecasting, indicating the great potential for uncertainty quantification of numerous predictive applications.
Thibault Lemaitre-Basset, Ludovic Oudin, Guillaume Thirel, and Lila Collet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2147–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2147-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing temperature will impact evaporation and water resource management. Hydrological models are fed with an estimation of the evaporative demand of the atmosphere, called potential evapotranspiration (PE). The objectives of this study were (1) to compute the future PE anomaly over France and (2) to determine the impact of the choice of the method to estimate PE. Our results show that all methods present similar future trends. No method really stands out from the others.
Jing Xu, François Anctil, and Marie-Amélie Boucher
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1001–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1001-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1001-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The performance of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) is compared with a conventional post-processing method of affine kernel dressing. NSGA-II showed its superiority in improving the forecast skill and communicating trade-offs with end-users. It allows the enhancement of the forecast quality since it allows for setting multiple specific objectives from scratch. This flexibility should be considered as a reason to implement hydrologic ensemble prediction systems (H-EPSs).
Emixi Sthefany Valdez, François Anctil, and Maria-Helena Ramos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 197–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how a precipitation post-processor interacts with other tools for uncertainty quantification in a hydrometeorological forecasting chain. Four systems were implemented to generate 7 d ensemble streamflow forecasts, which vary from partial to total uncertainty estimation. Overall analysis showed that post-processing and initial condition estimation ensure the most skill improvements, in some cases even better than a system that considers all sources of uncertainty.
Haowen Yue, Mekonnen Gebremichael, and Vahid Nourani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 167–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-167-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-167-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The development of high-resolution global precipitation forecasts and the lack of reliable precipitation forecasts over Africa motivates this work to evaluate the precipitation forecasts from the Global Forecast System (GFS) over the Niger river basin in Africa. The GFS forecasts, at a 15 d accumulation timescale, have an acceptable performance; however, the forecasts are highly biased. It is recommended to apply bias correction to GFS forecasts before their application.
Hadush Meresa, Conor Murphy, Rowan Fealy, and Saeed Golian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5237–5257, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5237-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5237-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The assessment of future impacts of climate change is associated with a cascade of uncertainty linked to the modelling chain employed in assessing local-scale changes. Understanding and quantifying this cascade is essential for developing effective adaptation actions. We find that not only do the contributions of different sources of uncertainty vary by catchment, but that the dominant sources of uncertainty can be very different on a catchment-by-catchment basis.
Qichun Yang, Quan J. Wang, Kirsti Hakala, and Yating Tang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4773–4788, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4773-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4773-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts of water losses from land surface to the air are highly valuable for water resource management and planning. In this study, we aim to fill a critical knowledge gap in the forecasting of evaporative water loss. Model experiments across Australia clearly suggest the necessity of correcting errors in input variables for more reliable water loss forecasting. We anticipate that the strategy developed in our work will benefit future water loss forecasting and lead to more skillful forecasts.
Mostafa Tarek, François Brissette, and Richard Arsenault
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3331–3350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3331-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3331-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
It is not known how much uncertainty the choice of a reference data set may bring to impact studies. This study compares precipitation and temperature data sets to evaluate the uncertainty contribution to the results of climate change studies. Results show that all data sets provide good streamflow simulations over the reference period. The reference data sets also provided uncertainty that was equal to or larger than that related to general circulation models over most of the catchments.
Liming Wang, Songjun Han, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 375–386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-375-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-375-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
It remains unclear at which timescale the complementary principle performs best in estimating evaporation. In this study, evaporation estimation was assessed over 88 eddy covariance monitoring sites at multiple timescales. The results indicate that the generalized complementary functions perform best in estimating evaporation at the monthly scale. This study provides a reference for choosing a suitable time step for evaporation estimations in relevant studies.
Okjeong Lee, Jeonghyeon Choi, Jeongeun Won, and Sangdan Kim
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5077–5093, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5077-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5077-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The uncertainty of the model interpreting rainfall extremes with temperature is analyzed. The performance of the model focuses on the reliability of the output. It has been found that the selection of temperatures suitable for extreme levels plays an important role in improving model reliability. Based on this, a methodology is proposed to quantify the degree of uncertainty inherent in the change in rainfall extremes due to global warming.
Chao Gao, Martijn J. Booij, and Yue-Ping Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3251–3269, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies the impact of climate change on high and low flows and quantifies the contribution of uncertainty sources from representative concentration pathways (RCPs), global climate models (GCMs) and internal climate variability in extreme flows. Internal climate variability was reflected in a stochastic rainfall model. The results show the importance of internal climate variability and GCM uncertainty in high flows and GCM and RCP uncertainty in low flows especially for the far future.
Xudong Zhou, Jan Polcher, Tao Yang, and Ching-Sheng Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2061–2081, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2061-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2061-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This article proposes a new estimation approach for assessing the uncertainty with multiple datasets by fully considering all variations in temporal and spatial dimensions. Comparisons demonstrate that classical metrics may underestimate the uncertainties among datasets due to an averaging process in their algorithms. This new approach is particularly suitable for overall assessment of multiple climatic products, but can be easily applied to other spatiotemporal products in related fields.
Lionel Berthet, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Julie Viatgé, Renaud Marty, and Olivier Piotte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2017–2041, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2017-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2017-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
An increasing number of flood forecasting services assess and communicate the uncertainty associated with their forecasts. We present a crash-testing framework that evaluates the quality of hydrological forecasts in an extrapolation context. Overall, the results highlight the challenge of uncertainty quantification when forecasting high flows. They show a significant drop in reliability when forecasting high flows and considerable variability among catchments and across lead times.
Shaoning Lv, Bernd Schalge, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, and Clemens Simmer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1957–1973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1957-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1957-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Passive remote sensing of soil moisture has good potential to improve weather forecasting via data assimilation in theory. We use the virtual reality data set (VR01) to infer the impact of sampling density on soil moisture ground cal/val activity. It shows how the sampling error is growing with an increasing sampling distance for a SMOS–SMAP scale footprint in about 40 km, 9 km, and 3 km. The conclusion will help in understanding the passive remote sensing soil moisture products.
Thanh Le and Deg-Hyo Bae
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1131–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1131-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1131-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Here we investigate the response of global evaporation to main climate modes, including the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Our results indicate that ENSO is an important driver of evaporation for many regions, while the impacts of NAO and IOD are substantial. This study allows us to obtain insight about the predictability of evaporation and, hence, may help to improve the early-warning systems of climate extremes.
Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Michael Herzog, and Cameron A. Petrie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 427–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-427-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-427-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The amount of precipitation falling in the Indus River basin remains uncertain while its variability impacts 100 million inhabitants. A comparison of datasets from diverse sources (ground remote observations, model outputs) reduces this uncertainty significantly. Grounded observations offer the most reliable long-term variability but with important underestimation in winter over the mountains. By contrast, recent model outputs offer better estimations of total amount and short-term variability.
Kamal Ahmed, Dhanapala A. Sachindra, Shamsuddin Shahid, Mehmet C. Demirel, and Eun-Sung Chung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4803–4824, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the performance of 36 CMIP5 GCMs in simulating seasonal precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature over Pakistan using spatial metrics (SPAtial EFficiency, fractions skill score, Goodman–Kruskal's lambda, Cramer's V, Mapcurves, and Kling–Gupta efficiency) for the period 1961–2005. NorESM1-M, MIROC5, BCC-CSM1-1, and ACCESS1-3 were identified as the most suitable GCMs for simulating all three climate variables over Pakistan.
Sungmin O and Ulrich Foelsche
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2863–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2863-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2863-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We analyze heavy local rainfall to address questions regarding the spatial uncertainty due to the approximation of areal rainfall using point measurements. Ten years of rainfall data from a dense network of 150 rain gauges in southeastern Austria are employed, which permits robust examination of small-scale rainfall at various horizontal resolutions. Quantitative uncertainty information from the study can guide both data users and producers to estimate uncertainty in their own rainfall dataset.
Aifeng Lv, Bo Qu, Shaofeng Jia, and Wenbin Zhu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 883–896, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-883-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-883-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
ENSO-related changes in daily precipitation regimes are currently ignored by the scientific community. We analyzed the anomalies of daily precipitation and hydrological extremes caused by different phases of ENSO events, as well as the possible driving mechanisms, to reveal the influence of ENSO on China's daily precipitation regimes. Our results provide a valuable tool for daily precipitation prediction and enable the prioritization of adaptation efforts ahead of extreme events in China.
Micheal J. Simpson and Neil I. Fox
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3375–3389, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3375-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3375-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Many researchers have expressed that one of the main difficulties in modeling watershed hydrology is that of obtaining continuous, widespread weather input data, especially precipitation. The overarching objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive study of three weather radars as a function of range. We found that radar-estimated precipitation was best at ranges between 100 and 150 km from the radar, with different radar parameters being superior at varying distances from the radar.
Vimal Mishra, Reepal Shah, Syed Azhar, Harsh Shah, Parth Modi, and Rohini Kumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2269–2284, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2269-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2269-2018, 2018
Sanjib Sharma, Ridwan Siddique, Seann Reed, Peter Ahnert, Pablo Mendoza, and Alfonso Mejia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1831–1849, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1831-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1831-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the relative roles of statistical weather preprocessing and streamflow postprocessing in hydrological ensemble forecasting at short- to medium-range forecast lead times (day 1–7). For this purpose, we develop and implement a regional hydrologic ensemble prediction system (RHEPS). Overall analysis shows that implementing both preprocessing and postprocessing ensures the most skill improvements, but postprocessing alone can often be a competitive alternative.
Kevin Sene, Wlodek Tych, and Keith Beven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 127–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-127-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-127-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The theme of the paper is exploration of the potential for seasonal flow forecasting for large lakes using a range of stochastic transfer function techniques with additional insights gained from simple analytical approximations. The methods were evaluated using records for two of the largest lakes in the world. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relevance of the results to operational flow forecasting systems for other large lakes.
Fan Yang, Hui Lu, Kun Yang, Jie He, Wei Wang, Jonathon S. Wright, Chengwei Li, Menglei Han, and Yishan Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5805–5821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5805-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5805-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we show that CLDAS has the highest spatial and temporal resolution, and it performs best in terms of precipitation, while it overestimates the shortwave radiation. CMFD also has high resolution and its shortwave radiation data match well with the station data; its annual-mean precipitation is reliable but its monthly precipitation needs improvements. Both GLDAS and CN05.1 over mainland China need to be improved. The results can benefit researchers for forcing data selection.
Rachel Bazile, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Luc Perreault, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5747–5762, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5747-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5747-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Meteorological forecasting agencies constantly work on pushing the limit of predictability farther in time. However, some end users need proof that climate model outputs are ready to be implemented operationally. We show that bias correction is crucial for the use of ECMWF System4 forecasts for the studied area and there is a potential for the use of 1-month-ahead forecasts. Beyond this, forecast performance is equivalent to using past climatology series as inputs to the hydrological model.
Judith Eeckman, Pierre Chevallier, Aaron Boone, Luc Neppel, Anneke De Rouw, Francois Delclaux, and Devesh Koirala
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4879–4893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4879-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4879-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The central part of the Himalayan Range presents tremendous heterogeneity in terms of topography and climatology, but the representation of hydro-climatic processes for Himalayan catchments is limited due to a lack of knowledge in such poorly instrumented environments. The proposed approach is to characterize the effect of altitude on precipitation by considering ensembles of acceptable altitudinal factors. Ensembles of acceptable values for the components of the water cycle are then provided.
Jefferson S. Wong, Saman Razavi, Barrie R. Bonsal, Howard S. Wheater, and Zilefac E. Asong
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2163–2185, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This study was conducted to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of the errors associated with various gridded precipitation products in Canada. Overall, WFDEI [GPCC] and CaPA performed best with respect to different performance measures, followed by ANUSPLIN and WEDEI [CRU]. Princeton and NARR demonstrated the lowest quality. Comparing the climate model-simulated products, PCIC ensembles generally performed better than NA-CORDEX ensembles in terms of reliability in four seasons.
Danlu Guo, Seth Westra, and Holger R. Maier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2107–2126, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2107-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2107-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This study assessed the impact of baseline climate conditions on the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration (PET) to a large range of plausible changes in temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation and wind speed at 30 Australian locations. Around 2-fold greater PET changes were observed at cool and humid locations compared to others, indicating potential for elevated water loss in the future. These impacts can be useful to inform the selection of PET models under a changing climate.
Vojtěch Svoboda, Martin Hanel, Petr Máca, and Jan Kyselý
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 963–980, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-963-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-963-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The study presents validation of precipitation events as simulated by an ensemble of regional climate models for the Czech Republic. While the number of events per season, seasonal total precipitation due to heavy events and the distribution of rainfall depths are simulated relatively well, event maximum precipitation and event intensity are strongly underestimated. This underestimation cannot be explained by scale mismatch between point observations and area average (climate model simulations).
Martin Hanel, Petr Máca, Petr Bašta, Radek Vlnas, and Pavel Pech
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4307–4322, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4307-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4307-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The paper is focused on assessment of the contribution of various sources of uncertainty to the estimated rainfall erosivity factor. It is shown that the rainfall erosivity factor can be estimated with reasonable precision even from records shorter than recommended, provided good spatial coverage and reasonable explanatory variables are available. The research was done as an update of the R factor estimates for the Czech Republic, which were later used for climate change assessment.
Jean-Philippe Vidal, Benoît Hingray, Claire Magand, Eric Sauquet, and Agnès Ducharne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3651–3672, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3651-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3651-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Possible transient futures of winter and summer low flows for two snow-influenced catchments in the southern French Alps show a strong decrease signal. It is however largely masked by the year-to-year variability, which should be the main target for defining adaptation strategies. Responses of different hydrological models strongly diverge in the future, suggesting to carefully check the robustness of evapotranspiration and snowpack components under a changing climate.
Louise Arnal, Maria-Helena Ramos, Erin Coughlan de Perez, Hannah Louise Cloke, Elisabeth Stephens, Fredrik Wetterhall, Schalk Jan van Andel, and Florian Pappenberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3109–3128, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3109-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3109-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts are produced as probabilities of occurrence of specific events, which is both an added value and a challenge for users. This paper presents a game on flood protection, "How much are you prepared to pay for a forecast?", which investigated how users perceive the value of forecasts and are willing to pay for them when making decisions. It shows that users are mainly influenced by the perceived quality of the forecasts, their need for the information and their degree of risk tolerance.
K. Sunilkumar, T. Narayana Rao, and S. Satheeshkumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1719–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1719-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1719-2016, 2016
Vincent Roth and Tatenda Lemann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 921–934, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-921-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-921-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) suggests using the CFSR global rainfall data for modelling discharge and soil erosion in data-scarce parts of the world. These data are freely available and ready to use for SWAT modelling. However, simulations with the CFSR data in the Ethiopian Highlands were unable to represent the specific regional climates and showed high discrepancies. This article compares SWAT simulations with conventional rainfall data and with CFSR rainfall data.
J. Kim and S. K. Park
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 651–658, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-651-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-651-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study examined the uncertainty in climatological precipitation in East Asia, calculated from five gridded analysis data sets based on in situ rain gauge observations from 1980 to 2007. It is found that the regions of large uncertainties are typically lightly populated and are characterized by severe terrain and/or very high elevations. Thus, care must be taken in using long-term trends calculated from gridded precipitation analysis data for climate studies over such regions in East Asia.
M. F. Rios Gaona, A. Overeem, H. Leijnse, and R. Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3571–3584, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3571-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3571-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Commercial cellular networks are built for telecommunication purposes. These kinds of networks have lately been used to obtain rainfall maps at country-wide scales. From previous studies, we now quantify the uncertainties associated with such maps. To do so, we divided the sources or error into two categories: from microwave link measurements and from mapping. It was found that the former is the source that contributes the most to the overall error in rainfall maps from microwave link network.
S. H. Alemohammad, K. A. McColl, A. G. Konings, D. Entekhabi, and A. Stoffelen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3489–3503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3489-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3489-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces a new variant of the triple collocation technique with multiplicative error model. The method is applied, for the first time, to precipitation products across the central part of continental USA. Results show distinctive patterns of error variance in each product that are estimated without a priori assumption of any of the error distributions. The correlation coefficients between each product and the truth are also estimated, which provides another performance perspective.
M. S. Raleigh, J. D. Lundquist, and M. P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis is used to examine how error characteristics (type, distributions, and magnitudes) in meteorological forcing data impact outputs from a physics-based snow model in four climates. Bias and error magnitudes were key factors in model sensitivity and precipitation bias often dominated. However, the relative importance of forcings depended somewhat on the selected model output. Forcing uncertainty was comparable to model structural uncertainty as found in other studies.
S. Garrigues, A. Olioso, J. C. Calvet, E. Martin, S. Lafont, S. Moulin, A. Chanzy, O. Marloie, S. Buis, V. Desfonds, N. Bertrand, and D. Renard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3109–3131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3109-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3109-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration are assessed over a 12-year Mediterranean crop succession. Evapotranspiration mainly results from soil evaporation when it is simulated over a Mediterranean crop succession. This leads to a high sensitivity to the soil parameters. Errors on soil hydraulic properties can lead to a large bias in cumulative evapotranspiration over a long period of time. Accounting for uncertainties in soil properties is essential for land surface modelling.
W. Gong, Q. Duan, J. Li, C. Wang, Z. Di, Y. Dai, A. Ye, and C. Miao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2409-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2409-2015, 2015
S. O. Los
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1713–1725, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1713-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1713-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The study evaluates annual precipitation (largely rainfall) amounts for the tropics and subtropics; precipitation was obtained from ground observations, satellite observations and numerical weather forecasting models.
- Annual precipitation amounts from ground and satellite observations were the most realistic.
- Newer weather forecasting models better predicted annual precipitation than older models.
- Weather forecasting models predicted inaccurate precipitation amounts for Africa.
A. Kann, I. Meirold-Mautner, F. Schmid, G. Kirchengast, J. Fuchsberger, V. Meyer, L. Tüchler, and B. Bica
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1547–1559, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1547-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1547-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The paper introduces a high resolution precipitation analysis system which operates on 1 km x 1 km resolution with high frequency updates of 5 minutes. The ability of such a system to adequately assess the convective precipitation distribution is evaluated by means of an independant, high resolution station network. This dense station network allows for a thorough evaluation of the analyses under different convective situations and of the representativeness error of raingaue measurements.
C. H. Wu, G. R. Huang, and H. J. Yu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1385–1399, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1385-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1385-2015, 2015
T. Antofie, G. Naumann, J. Spinoni, and J. Vogt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 177–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-177-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-177-2015, 2015
P. López López, J. S. Verkade, A. H. Weerts, and D. P. Solomatine
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3411–3428, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3411-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3411-2014, 2014
G. Naumann, E. Dutra, P. Barbosa, F. Pappenberger, F. Wetterhall, and J. V. Vogt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1625–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1625-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1625-2014, 2014
K. Liechti, L. Panziera, U. Germann, and M. Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3853–3869, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3853-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3853-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Anagnostou, M. N., Kalogiros, J., Anagnostou, E. N., Tarolli, M., Papadopoulos,
A., and Borga, M.: Performance evaluation of high-resolution rainfall
estimation by X-band dual-polarization radar for flash flood applications in
mountainous basins, J. Hydrol., 394, 4–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.026, 2010. a
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., Usart-Sanchez, I., and Lavabre,
J.: Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the
parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 250, 206–223,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00437-1, 2001. a
Aronica, G., Freni, G., and Oliveri, E.: Uncertainty analysis of the influence
of rainfall time resolution in the modelling of urban drainage systems,
Hydrol. Process., 19, 1055–1071, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5645, 2005. a, b
Baeck, M. L. and Smith, J. A.: Rainfall Estimation by the WSR-88D for Heavy
Rainfall Events, Weather Forecast., 13, 416–436,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0416:REBTWF>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Bech, J., Codina, B., Lorente, J., and Bebbington, D.: The Sensitivity of
Single Polarization Weather Radar Beam Blockage Correction to Variability in
the Vertical Refractivity Gradient, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20,
845–855, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0845:TSOSPW>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Berg, P., Norin, L., and Olsson, J.: Creation of a high resolution
precipitation data set by merging gridded gauge data and radar observations
for Sweden, J. Hydrol., 541, 6–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.031,
2016. a, b
Berne, A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Radar for hydrology: Unfulfilled promise or
unrecognized potential?, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 357–366,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.005, 2013. a, b
Berne, A., Delrieu, G., Creutin, J.-D., and Obled, C.: Temporal and spatial
resolution of rainfall measurements required for urban hydrology, J. Hydrol.,
299, 166–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.002, 2004. a, b
Blenkinsop, S., Lewis, E., Chan, S. C., and Fowler, H. J.: Quality-control of
an hourly rainfall dataset and climatology of extremes for the UK, Int. J.
Climatol., 37, 722–740, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4735, 2017. a
Brandes, E. A., Ryzhkov, A. V., and Zrnic, D. S.: An evaluation of radar
rainfall estimates from specific differential phase, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 18, 363–375,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0363:AEORRE>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric doppler weather radar,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. a
Bruni, G., Reinoso, R., van de Giesen, N. C., Clemens, F. H. L. R., and ten Veldhuis, J. A. E.: On the sensitivity of urban hydrodynamic modelling to rainfall spatial and temporal resolution, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 691–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-691-2015, 2015. a, b, c
Chandrasekar, V., Keranen, R., Lim, S., and Moisseev, D.: Recent advances in
classification of observations from dual polarization weather radars, Atmos.
Res., 119, 97–111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.08.014, 2013. a
Chang, M. and Flannery, L. A.: Spherical gauges for improving the accuracy of
rainfall measurements, Hydrol. Process., 15, 643–654,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.181, 2001. a
Ciach, G. J.: Local random errors in tipping-bucket rain gauge measurements, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 752–759,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)20<752:LREITB>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Ciach, G. J. and Krajewski, W. F.: On the estimation of radar rainfall error
variance, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 585–595,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00043-8, 1999a. a, b, c
Ciach, G. J. and Krajewski, W. F.: Radar-Rain Gauge Comparisons under
Observational Uncertainties, J. Appl. Meteorol., 38, 1519–1525,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1519:RRGCUO>2.0.CO;2, 1999b. a
Collier, C. G.: Flash flood forecasting: What are the limits of
predictability?, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 3–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.29,
2007. a
Collier, C. G. and Knowles, J. M.: Accuracy of rainfall estimates by radar,
part III: application for short-term flood forecasting, J. Hydrol., 83,
237–249, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90154-X, 1986. a
Courty, L. G., Rico-Ramirez, M. A., and Pedrozo-Acuna, A.: The Significance of
the Spatial Variability of Rainfall on the Numerical Simulation of Urban
Floods, Water, 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020207, 2018. a, b
Cristiano, E., ten Veldhuis, M.-C., and van de Giesen, N.: Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and their effects on hydrological response in urban areas – a review, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3859–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3859-2017, 2017. a
Cunha, L. K., Mandapaka, P. V., Krajewski, W. F., Mantilla, R., and Bradley,
A. A.: Impact of radar-rainfall error structure on estimated flood magnitude
across scales: An investigation based on a parsimonious distributed
hydrological model, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10515,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012138, 2012. a
Cunha, L. K., Smith, J. A., Krajewski, W. F., Baeck, M. L., and Seo, B.-C.:
NEXRAD NWS Polarimetric Precipitation Product Evaluation for IFloodS, J.
Hydrometeorol., 16, 1676–1699, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0148.1, 2015. a, b
Dai, Q. and Han, D.: Exploration of discrepancy between radar and gauge
rainfall estimates driven by wind fields, Water Resour. Res., 50, 8571–8588,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015794, 2014. a, b
Delrieu, G., Nicol, J., Yates, E., Kirstetter, P.-E., Creutin, J.-D., Anquetin,
S., Obled, C., Saulnier, G.-M., Ducrocq, V., Gaume, E., Payrastre, O.,
Andrieu, H., Ayral, P.-A., Bouvier, C., Neppel, L., Livet, M., Lang, M.,
du Châtelet, J., Walpersdorf, A., and Wobrock, W.: The Catastrophic
Flash-Flood Event of 8-9 September 2002 in the Gard Region, France: A First
Case Study for the Cévennes-Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological
Observatory, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 34–52, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-400.1, 2005. a
Delrieu, G., Wijbrans, A., Boudevillain, B., Faure, D., Bonnifait, L., and
Kirstetter, P.-E.: Geostatistical radar-raingauge merging: A novel method
for the quantification of rain estimation accuracy, Adv. Water Resour., 71,
110–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.06.005, 2014. a, b
Dupasquier, B., Andrieu, H., Delrieu, G., Griffith, R. J., and Cluckie, I.:
Influence of the VRP on High Frequency Fluctuations Between Radar and
Raingage Data, Phys. Chem. Earth, 25, 1021–1025,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00146-5, 2000. a
Einfalt, T., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Golz, C., Jensen, N. E., Quirmbach, M.,
Vaes, G., and Vieux, B.: Towards a roadmap for use of radar rainfall data in
urban drainage, J. Hydrol., 299, 186–202,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.004, 2004. a
Fairman, J. G., Schultz, D. M., Kirshbaum, D. J., Gray, S. L., and Barrett,
A. I.: Climatology of Size, Shape, and Intensity of Precipitation Features
over Great Britain and Ireland, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 1595–1615,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0222.1, 2017. a
Goudenhoofdt, E. and Delobbe, L.: Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 195–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-195-2009, 2009. a
Goudenhoofdt, E., Delobbe, L., and Willems, P.: Regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfall in Belgium based on radar estimates, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5385–5399, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5385-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Gourley, J. J., Tabary, P., and Parent-du Chatelet, J.: Data quality of the
Meteo-France C-band polarimetric radar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 23,
1340–1356, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1912.1, 2006. a
Gourley, J. J., Tabary, P., and Parent-du Chatelet, J.: A fuzzy logic algorithm
for the separation of precipitating from nonprecipitating echoes using
polarimetric radar observations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 1439–1451,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2035.1, 2007. a
Gu, J.-Y., Ryzhkov, A., Zhang, P., Neilley, P., Knight, M., Wolf, B., and Lee,
D.-I.: Polarimetric Attenuation Correction in Heavy Rain at C Band, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 50, 39–58, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2258.1, 2011. a
He, X., Sonnenborg, T. O., Refsgaard, J. C., Vejen, F., and Jensen, K. H.:
Evaluation of the value of radar QPE data and rain gauge data for
hydrological modeling, Water Resour. Res., 49, 5989–6005,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20471, 2013. a, b
Holleman, I.: Bias adjustment and long-term verification of radar-based
precipitation estimates, Meteorol. Appl., 14, 195–203, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.22,
2007. a, b
Holleman, I. and Beekhuis, H.: Review of the KNMI clutter removal scheme, Tech.
Rep. TR-284, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute KNMI, available
at: https://www.knmi.nl/publications/fulltexts (last access: 15 June 2020), 2005. a
Holleman, I., Huuskonen, A., Kurri, M., and Beekhuis, H.: Operational
monitoring of weather radar receiving chain using the sun, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 159–166, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1213.1, 2010. a
Huuskonen, A., Saltikoff, E., and Holleman, I.: The Operational Weather Radar
Network in Europe, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 897–907,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00216.1, 2014. a
KNMI: Handbook for the Meteorological Observation, Tech. rep., Koninklijk
Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut, De Bilt, Netherlands, available at: http://projects.knmi.nl/hawa/pdf/Handbook_H01_H06.pdf (last access: 15 June 2020), 2000. a
Koistinen, J. and Pohjola, H.: Estimation of Ground-Level Reflectivity Factor
in Operational Weather Radar Networks Using VPR-Based Correction Ensembles,
J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 2394–2411, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0343.1, 2014. a
Krajewski, W. F.: Cokriging radar-rainfall and rain-gauge data, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 90, 9571–9580, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD08p09571, 1987. a
Krajewski, W. F. and Smith, J. A.: Radar hydrology: rainfall estimation, Adv.
Water Resour., 25, 1387–1394, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.018, 2002. a
Krajewski, W. F., Villarini, G., and Smith, J. A.: RADAR-Rainfall
Uncertainties: Where are we after Thirty Years of Effort?, B. Am.
Meteor. Soc., 91, 87–94, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2747.1, 2010. a, b, c
Lee, G.: Sources of errors in rainfall measurements by polarimetric radar:
variability of drop size distributions, observational noise, and variation of
relationships between R and polarimetric parameters, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 23, 1005–1028, 2006. a
Leinonen, J., Moisseev, D., Leskinen, M., and Petersen, W. A.: A Climatology
of Disdrometer Measurements of Rainfall in Finland over Five Years with
Implications for Global Radar Observations, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51,
392–404, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-056.1, 2012. a, b
Löwe, R., Thorndahl, S., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rasmussen, M. R., and Madsen,
H.: Probabilistic online runoff forecasting for urban catchments using inputs
from rain gauges as well as statically and dynamically adjusted weather
radar, J. Hydrol., 512, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.027, 2014. a, b
Madsen, H., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rosbjerg, D., and Harremoës, P.: Estimation
of regional intensity-duration-frequency curves for extreme precipitation,
Water Sci. Technol., 37, 29–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00313-8, 1998. a, b
Madsen, H., Gregersen, I. B., Rosbjerg, D., and Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K.: Regional
frequency analysis of short duration rainfall extremes using gridded daily
rainfall data as co-variate, Water Sci. Technol., 75, 1971–1981,
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.089, 2017. a, b
Matrosov, S. Y., Cifelli, R., Kennedy, P. C., Nesbitt, S. W., Rutledge, S. A.,
Bringi, V. N., and Martner, B. E.: A comparative study of rainfall
retrievals based on specific differential phase shifts at X- and S-band radar
frequencies, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 23, 952–963,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1887.1, 2006. a
Matrosov, S. Y., Clark, K. A., and Kingsmill, D. E.: A polarimetric radar
approach to identify rain, melting-layer, and snow regions for applying
corrections to vertical profiles of reflectivity, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46,
154–166, 2007. a
Michelson, D.: The Swedish weather radar production chain, in: Proceedings
of Fourth European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology (ERAD),
Barcelona, Spain, 382–385, 2006. a
Michelson, D., Henja, A., Ernes, S., Haase, G., Koistinen, J., Ośródka,
K., Peltonen, T., Szewczykowski, M., and Szturc, J.: BALTRAD Advanced
Weather Radar Networking, J. Open Res. Softw., 6, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.193, 2018. a, b
Nielsen, J. E., Thorndahl, S. L., and Rasmussen, M. R.: A Numerical Method to
Generate High Temporal Resolution Precipitation Time Series by Combining
Weather Radar Measurements with a Nowcast Model, Atmos. Res., 138, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.015, 2014. a
Niemi, T. J., Warsta, L., Taka, M., Hickman, B., Pulkkinen, S., Krebs, G.,
Moisseev, D. N., Koivusalo, H., and Kokkonen, T.: Applicability of open
rainfall data to event-scale urban rainfall-runoff modelling, J. Hydrol.,
547, 143–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.056, 2017. a
Norin, L., Devasthale, A., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Wood, N. B., and Smalley, M.: Intercomparison of snowfall estimates derived from the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and the ground-based weather radar network over Sweden, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5009–5021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5009-2015, 2015. a, b
Ntelekos, A. A., Smith, J. A., and Krajewski, W. F.: Climatological Analyses
of Thunderstorms and Flash Floods in the Baltimore Metropolitan Region, J.
Hydrometeorol., 8, 88–101, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM558.1, 2007. a
Nystuen, J. A.: Relative performance of automatic rain gauges under different
rainfall conditions, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16, 1025–1043,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1025:RPOARG>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b
Ochoa-Rodriguez, S., Wang, L.-P., Gires, A., Pina, R. D., Reinoso-Rondinel, R.,
Bruni, G., Ichiba, A., Gaitan, S., Cristiano, E., van Assel, J., Kroll, S.,
Damian Murlà-Tuyls, D., Tisserand, B., Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia,
I., Onof, C., Willems, P., and ten Veldhuis, M.-C.: Impact of spatial and
temporal resolution of rainfall inputs on urban hydrodynamic modelling
outputs: A multi-catchment investigation, J. Hydrol., 531, 389–407,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.035, 2015. a
Ogden, F. L. and Julien, P. Y.: Runoff model sensitivity to radar rainfall
resolution, J. Hydrol., 158, 1–18, 1994. a
Otto, T. and Russchenberg, H. W. J.: Estimation of specific differential phase
and differential backscatter phase from polarimetric weather radar
measurements of rain, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 8, 988–992,
https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2011.2145354, 2011. a
Overeem, A., Buishand, T. A., and Holleman, I.: Extreme rainfall analysis and
estimation of depth-duration-frequency curves using weather radar, Water
Resour. Res., 45, W10424, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007869, 2009a. a, b
Overeem, A., Buishand, T. A., Holleman, I., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Extreme value
modeling of areal rainfall from weather radar, Water Resour. Res., 46,
W09514, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008517, 2010. a
Peleg, N., Marra, F., Fatichi, S., Paschalis, A., Molnar, P., and Burlando, P.:
Spatial variability of extreme rainfall at radar subpixel scale, J. Hydrol.,
556, 922–933, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.033, 2018. a
Pollock, M. D., O'Donnell, G., Quinn, P., Dutton, M., Black, A., Wilkinson, M.,
Colli, M., Stagnaro, M., Lanza, L. G., Lewis, E., Kilsby, C. G., and
O'Connell, P. E.: Quantifying and Mitigating Wind-Induced Undercatch in
Rainfall Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 54, 3863–3875,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022421, 2018. a, b
Rafieeinasab, A., Norouzi, A., Kim, S., Habibi, H., Nazari, B., Seo, D.-J.,
Lee, H., Cosgrove, B., and Cui, Z.: Toward high-resolution flash flood
prediction in large urban areas – Analysis of sensitivity to spatiotemporal
resolution of rainfall input and hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 531,
370–388, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.045, 2015. a, b
Rickenbach, T. M., Nieto-Ferreira, R., Zarzar, C., and Nelson, B.: A seasonal
and diurnal climatology of precipitation organization in the southeastern
United States, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1938–1956,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2500, 2015. a
Rico-Ramirez, M. A., Liguori, S., and Schellart, A. N. A.: Quantifying
radar-rainfall uncertainties in urban drainage flow modelling, J. Hydrol.,
528, 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.057, 2015. a
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and Mejía, J. M.: On the transformation of point
rainfall to areal rainfall, Water Resour. Res., 10, 729–735,
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i004p00729, 1974. a
Rossa, A., Liechti, K., Zappa, M., Bruen, M., Germann, U., Haase, G., Keil, C.,
and Krahe, P.: The COST 731 Action: a review on uncertainty propagation in
advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems, Atmos. Res., 100, 150–167,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.11.016, 2011. a
Ruzanski, E., Chandrasekar, V., and Wang, Y. T.: The CASA nowcasting system,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 28, 640–655, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JTECHA1496.1,
2011. a
Ryzhkov, A. and Zrnic, D. S.: Assessment of rainfall measurement that uses
specific differential phase, J. Appl. Meteorol., 35, 2080–2090,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<2080:AORMTU>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Ryzhkov, A. V. and Zrnic, D. S.: Discrimination between rain and snow with a
polarimetric radar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 1228–1240, 1998. a
Saltikoff, E., Haase, G., Delobbe, L., Gaussiat, N., Martet, M., Idziorek, D.,
Leijnse, H., Novák, P., Lukach, M., and Stephan, K.: OPERA the Radar
Project, Atmosphere, 10, 1–13, 2019. a
Schilling, W.: Rainfall data for urban hydrology: what do we need?, Atmos.
Res., 27, 5–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(91)90003-F, 1991. a, b
Seo, B.-C., Dolan, B., Krajewski, W. F., Rutledge, S. A., and Petersen, W.:
Comparison of Single- and Dual-Polarization-Based Rainfall Estimates Using
NEXRAD Data for the NASA Iowa Flood Studies Project, J. Hydrometeorol., 16,
1658–1675, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0169.1, 2015. a, b
Sieck, L. C., Burges, S. J., and Steiner, M.: Challenges in obtaining reliable
measurements of point rainfall, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01420,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004519, 2007. a, b
Smith, J. A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Estimation of the Mean Field Bias of Radar
Rainfall Estimates, J. Appl. Meteorol., 30, 397–412,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0397:EOTMFB>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a, b
Smith, J. A., Seo, D. J., Baeck, M. L., and Hudlow, M. D.: An intercomparison
study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2035–2045,
https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00270, 1996. a
Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Meierdiercks, K. L., Miller, A. J., and Krajewski,
W. F.: Radar rainfall estimation for flash flood forecasting in small urban
watersheds, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 2087–2097,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.09.007, 2007. a
Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Villarini, G., Welty, C., Miller, A. J., and
Krajewski, W. F.: Analyses of a long-term, high-resolution radar rainfall
data set for the Baltimore metropolitan region, Water Resour. Res., 48,
W04504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010641, 2012. a, b
Stevenson, S. N. and Schumacher, R. S.: A 10-Year Survey of Extreme Rainfall
Events in the Central and Eastern United States Using Gridded Multisensor
Precipitation Analyses, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 3147–3162,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00345.1, 2014. a
Stransky, D., Bares, V., and Fatka, P.: The effect of rainfall measurement
uncertainties on rainfall-runoff processes modelling, Water Sci. Technol.,
55, 103–111, 2007. a
Thomsen, R. S. T.: Drift af Spildevandskomitéens
RegnmålersystemÅrsnotat 2015, Tech. rep., DMI, Copenhagen, available at: https://www.dmi.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Rapporter/TR/2016/DMI_Report_16_3.pdf (last
access: 13 December 2019), 2016. a
Thorndahl, S., Nielsen, J. E., and Rasmussen, M. R.: Bias adjustment and
advection interpolation of long-term high resolution radar rainfall series,
J. Hydrol., 508, 214–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.056,
2014a. a, b
Thorndahl, S., Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., and Krajewski, W. F.: Analyses of
the temporal and spatial structures of heavy rainfall from a catalog of
high-resolution radar rainfall fields, Atmos. Res., 144, 111–125,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.03.013, 2014b. a
Thorndahl, S., Nielsen, J. E., and Jensen, D. G.: Urban pluvial flood
prediction: a case study evaluating radar rainfall nowcasts and numerical
weather prediction models as model inputs, Water Sci. Technol., 74,
2599–2610, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.474, 2016. a
Thorndahl, S., Einfalt, T., Willems, P., Nielsen, J. E., ten Veldhuis, M.-C., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Rasmussen, M. R., and Molnar, P.: Weather radar rainfall data in urban hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1359–1380, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1359-2017, 2017. a
Thorndahl, S. L., Nielsen, J. E., and Rasmussen, M. R.: Estimation of Storm-Centred Areal Reduction Factors from Radar Rainfall for Design in Urban Hydrology, Water, 11, 1120, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061120, 2019. a, b
Tian, Y., Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Tang, L., Sapiano, M., Maggioni, V.,
and Wu, H.: Modeling errors in daily precipitation measurements: Additive or
multiplicative?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2060–2065,
https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50320, 2013. a
Vasiloff, S. V., Howard, K. W., and Zhang, J.: Difficulties with correcting
radar rainfall estimates based on rain gauge data: a case study of severe
weather in Montana on 16–17 June 2007, Weather Forecast., 24, 1334–1344,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222154.1, 2009. a, b
Vejen, F.: Teknisk rapport 06-15, Nyt SVK system, Sammenligning af
nedbørmålinger med nye og nuværende system, Tech. rep., DMI,
Copenhagen, available at: https://www.dmi.dk/fileadmin/Rapporter/TR/tr06-15.pdf (last access: 13 December 2019), 2006. a
Villarini, G., Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Sturdevant-Rees, P., and Krajewski,
W. F.: Radar analyses of extreme rainfall and flooding in urban drainage
basins, J. Hydrol., 381, 266–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.048, 2010. a
Wang, Y. and Chandrasekar, V.: Algorithm for Estimation of the Specific
Differential Phase, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2565–2578,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1358.1, 2009. a
Wang, Y. T. and Chandrasekar, V.: Quantitative precipitation estimation in the
CASA X-band dual-polarization radar network, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27,
1665–1676, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHA1419.1, 2010. a, b
Wessels, H. R. A. and Beekhuis, J. H.: Stepwise procedure for suppression of
anomalous ground clutter, in: Proc. COST-75, Weather Radar
Systems, International Seminar, Brussels, Belgium, 270–277, 1995. a
WMO: Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation,
WMO-No.8, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 7th ed. edn., 2008. a
Wójcik, O. P., Holt, J., Kjerulf, A., Müller, L., Ethelberg, S., and
Molbak, K.: Personal protective equipment, hygiene behaviours and
occupational risk of illness after July 2011 flood in Copenhagen, Denmark,
Epidemiol. Infect., 141, 1756–1763, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268812002038,
2013. a
Wood, S. J., Jones, D. A., and Moore, R. J.: Accuracy of rainfall measurement for scales of hydrological interest, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 531–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-531-2000, 2000. a
Wright, D. B., Smith, J. A., Villarini, G., and Baeck, M. L.: Hydroclimatology
of flash flooding in Atlanta, Water Resour. Res., 48, W04524,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011371, 2012. a
Wright, D. B., Smith, J. A., Villarini, G., and Baeck, M. L.: Long-Term
High-Resolution Radar Rainfall Fields for Urban Hydrology, J. Am. Water
Resour. As., 50, 713–734, https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12139, 2014. a, b
Yang, L., Smith, J., Baeck, M. L., Smith, B., Tian, F., and Niyogi, D.:
Structure and evolution of flash flood producing storms in a small urban
watershed, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3139–3152,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024478, 2016.
a
Yoo, C., Park, C., Yoon, J., and Kim, J.: Interpretation of mean-field bias
correction of radar rain rate using the concept of linear regression, Hydrol.
Process., 28, 5081–5092, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9972, 2014. a
Young, C. B., Bradley, A. A., Krajewski, W. F., Kruger, A., and Morrisey,
M. L.: Evaluating NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates for operational
hydrologic forecasting, J. Hydrometeorol., 1, 241–254, 2000. a
Zhou, Z., Smith, J. A., Yang, L., Baeck, M. L., Chaney, M., Ten Veldhuis,
M.-C., Deng, H., and Liu, S.: The complexities of urban flood response:
Flood frequency analyses for the Charlotte metropolitan region, Water
Resour. Res., 53, 7401–7425, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019997, 2017. a
Zrnic, D. S. and Ryzhkov, A. V.: Advantages of rain measurements using specific
differential phase, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 454–464,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0454:AORMUS>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a, b
Zrnic, D. S. and Ryzhkov, A. V.: Polarimetry for weather surveillance radars,
B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 80, 389–406, 1999. a
Short summary
A multinational assessment of radar's ability to capture heavy rain events is conducted. In total, six different radar products in Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden were considered. Results show a fair agreement, with radar underestimating by 17 %-44 % on average compared with gauges. Despite being adjusted for bias, five of six radar products still exhibited strong conditional biases with intensities of 1–2% per mm/h. Median peak intensity bias was significantly higher, reaching 44 %–67%.
A multinational assessment of radar's ability to capture heavy rain events is conducted. In...
