Articles | Volume 22, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4593-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4593-2018
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2018

How good are hydrological models for gap-filling streamflow data?

Yongqiang Zhang and David Post

Related authors

Integration of the Vegetation Phenology Module Improves Ecohydrological Simulation by the SWAT-Carbon Model
Mingwei Li, Shouzhi Chen, Fanghua Hao, Nan Wang, Zhaofei Wu, Yue Xu, Jing Zhang, Yongqiang Zhang, and Yongshuo H. Fu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-75,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-75, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Understanding meteorological and physio-geographical controls of variability of flood event classes in China
Yongyong Zhang, Yongqiang Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhai, Jun Xia, Qiuhong Tang, Wei Wang, Jian Wu, Xiaoyu Niu, and Bing Han
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-126,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-126, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
A daily and 500 m coupled evapotranspiration and gross primary production product across China during 2000–2020
Shaoyang He, Yongqiang Zhang, Ning Ma, Jing Tian, Dongdong Kong, and Changming Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5463–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5463-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5463-2022, 2022
Short summary
A 1 km daily surface soil moisture dataset of enhanced coverage under all-weather conditions over China in 2003–2019
Peilin Song, Yongqiang Zhang, Jianping Guo, Jiancheng Shi, Tianjie Zhao, and Bing Tong
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2613–2637, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2613-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2613-2022, 2022
Short summary
Low and contrasting impacts of vegetation CO2 fertilization on global terrestrial runoff over 1982–2010: accounting for aboveground and belowground vegetation–CO2 effects
Yuting Yang, Tim R. McVicar, Dawen Yang, Yongqiang Zhang, Shilong Piao, Shushi Peng, and Hylke E. Beck
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3411–3427, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3411-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3411-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
On the use of streamflow transformations for hydrological model calibration
Guillaume Thirel, Léonard Santos, Olivier Delaigue, and Charles Perrin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4837–4860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4837-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4837-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulation-based inference for parameter estimation of complex watershed simulators
Robert Hull, Elena Leonarduzzi, Luis De La Fuente, Hoang Viet Tran, Andrew Bennett, Peter Melchior, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4685–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-scale soil moisture data and process-based modeling reveal the importance of lateral groundwater flow in a subarctic catchment
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Catchment response to climatic variability: implications for root zone storage and streamflow predictions
Nienke Tempel, Laurène Bouaziz, Riccardo Taormina, Ellis van Noppen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4577–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hybrid hydrological modeling for large alpine basins: a semi-distributed approach
Bu Li, Ting Sun, Fuqiang Tian, Mahmut Tudaji, Li Qin, and Guangheng Ni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4521–4538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Roo, A., Miralles, D. G., McVicar, T. R., Schellekens, J., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3599–3622, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr018247, 2016. 
Burn, D. H. and Elnur, M. A. H.: Detection of hydrologic trends and variability, J. Hydrol., 255, 107–122, 2002. 
Chiew, F. H. S., Peel, M. C., and Western, A. W.: Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD, in: Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, edited by: Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K., Water resources Publication, Littleton, Colorado, USA, 335–367, 2002. 
Chiew, F. H. S., Teng, J., Vaze, J., Post, D. A., Perraud, J. M., Kirono, D. G. C., and Viney N. R.: Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method, Water Resour. Res.. 45, W10414, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007338, 2009. 
Chiew, F. H. S., Kirono, D. G. C., Kent, D. M., Frost, A. J., Charles, S. P., Timbal, B., Nguyen, K. C., and Fu, G.: Comparison of runoff modelled using rainfall from different downscaling methods for historical and future climates, J. Hydrol., 387, 10–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.025, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
It is a critical step to gap-fill streamflow data for most hydrological studies, such as streamflow trend, flood, and drought analysis and predictions. However, quantitative evaluation of the gap-filled data accuracy is not available. Here we conducted the first comprehensive study, and found that when the missing data rate is less than 10 %, the gap-filled streamflow data using hydrological models are reliable for annual streamflow and its trend analysis.