Articles | Volume 22, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4593-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4593-2018
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2018

How good are hydrological models for gap-filling streamflow data?

Yongqiang Zhang and David Post

Related authors

Integration of the Vegetation Phenology Module Improves Ecohydrological Simulation by the SWAT-Carbon Model
Mingwei Li, Shouzhi Chen, Fanghua Hao, Nan Wang, Zhaofei Wu, Yue Xu, Jing Zhang, Yongqiang Zhang, and Yongshuo H. Fu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-75,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-75, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Understanding meteorological and physio-geographical controls of variability of flood event classes in China
Yongyong Zhang, Yongqiang Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhai, Jun Xia, Qiuhong Tang, Wei Wang, Jian Wu, Xiaoyu Niu, and Bing Han
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-126,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-126, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
A daily and 500 m coupled evapotranspiration and gross primary production product across China during 2000–2020
Shaoyang He, Yongqiang Zhang, Ning Ma, Jing Tian, Dongdong Kong, and Changming Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5463–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5463-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5463-2022, 2022
Short summary
A 1 km daily surface soil moisture dataset of enhanced coverage under all-weather conditions over China in 2003–2019
Peilin Song, Yongqiang Zhang, Jianping Guo, Jiancheng Shi, Tianjie Zhao, and Bing Tong
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2613–2637, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2613-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2613-2022, 2022
Short summary
Low and contrasting impacts of vegetation CO2 fertilization on global terrestrial runoff over 1982–2010: accounting for aboveground and belowground vegetation–CO2 effects
Yuting Yang, Tim R. McVicar, Dawen Yang, Yongqiang Zhang, Shilong Piao, Shushi Peng, and Hylke E. Beck
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3411–3427, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3411-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3411-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Nicole Bäuerle, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Widespread flooding dynamics under climate change: characterising floods using grid-based hydrological modelling and regional climate projections
Adam Griffin, Alison L. Kay, Paul Sayers, Victoria Bell, Elizabeth Stewart, and Sam Carr
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2635–2650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: The sword of Damocles of the impossible flood
Alberto Montanari, Bruno Merz, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2603–2615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
Metamorphic testing of machine learning and conceptual hydrologic models
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2505–2529, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, 2024
Short summary
The influence of human activities on streamflow reductions during the megadrought in central Chile
Nicolás Álamos, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Ariel Muñoz, and Álvaro González-Reyes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Roo, A., Miralles, D. G., McVicar, T. R., Schellekens, J., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3599–3622, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr018247, 2016. 
Burn, D. H. and Elnur, M. A. H.: Detection of hydrologic trends and variability, J. Hydrol., 255, 107–122, 2002. 
Chiew, F. H. S., Peel, M. C., and Western, A. W.: Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD, in: Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, edited by: Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K., Water resources Publication, Littleton, Colorado, USA, 335–367, 2002. 
Chiew, F. H. S., Teng, J., Vaze, J., Post, D. A., Perraud, J. M., Kirono, D. G. C., and Viney N. R.: Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method, Water Resour. Res.. 45, W10414, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007338, 2009. 
Chiew, F. H. S., Kirono, D. G. C., Kent, D. M., Frost, A. J., Charles, S. P., Timbal, B., Nguyen, K. C., and Fu, G.: Comparison of runoff modelled using rainfall from different downscaling methods for historical and future climates, J. Hydrol., 387, 10–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.025, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
It is a critical step to gap-fill streamflow data for most hydrological studies, such as streamflow trend, flood, and drought analysis and predictions. However, quantitative evaluation of the gap-filled data accuracy is not available. Here we conducted the first comprehensive study, and found that when the missing data rate is less than 10 %, the gap-filled streamflow data using hydrological models are reliable for annual streamflow and its trend analysis.